#Factors Determining Political Stability

[vacantgodling]

we're gonna start with just the wives or this post is gonna be longer than it fucking needs to be jfc

The Order of Succession pt. 1: THE KING'S WIVES

For the Adrawdzugsha, succession was a complex process that was based on divine rights and a particularly important aspect of divine rights to the Adrawdzugsha was birth order. But before we can go into what that truly means, we first need to discuss the main ruling structure of the Adrawdzugsha.

For the most part, the Adrawdzugsha were very similar to other nations within their area: their main ruling body was comprised of a solitary hereditary male king. What set the Adrawdzugsha apart from their neighbors however, was their strict adherence to having multiple wives—three wives to be exact. And unlike other ‘harem style’ monarchical systems, where the king usually has a “main” wife who would be classed as a queen or empress and then he has numerous immeasurable concubines, and any children that result of those unions are, in most cases, considered ‘illegitimate,’ for the Adrwadzugsha, their 3 wives were all on equal level—and would all be addressed as queen. These queens however, served different functions to each ruler and were chosen with exceptional care, and they always had to be wed in a specific order:

Yinrshem: The Soul Wives

A King’s Yinrshe (yin-er-sha) was the first wife that he would wed, and can essentially be translated to The Soul Wife. A Yinrshe was chosen through a lengthy and secretive divination process that took many factors into account to determine compatibility. Unfortunately, many of those records were lost to time and so archaeologists are only able to make guesses as to some of the methods that a Yinrshe was chosen. However, it was common that these divinations were done in the months before a coronation as there is significant evidence that a Yinrshe being chosen was the signifying factor that allowed a king to ascend to the throne formally, and thus it was very important for a Yinrshe to be chosen quickly and accurately. 

These wives represented the “eyes” and we know this from the many Yinrshe masks that we have found, which are covered in markings that are easily translatable as eyes. They were considered to be the wife that should best understand the King’s intentions; often left in positions of as head of state which usually meant ruling in the king’s stead if he were off making war or on diplomatic trips with other neighboring kingdoms and could not be present to oversee important matters of state. In many occasions, the Yinrshe was considered as part of the king’s own soul, and would often be addressed as the king if the King was away from his position. This means, that occasionally, Yinrshes occupied a dual gender within Adrawdzugsha society; in the absence of her king, she would become he and would take on the dzibtswana of her king—which we can even see in instances where a king has passed before an heir is old enough to be formally chosen. 

While a Yinrshe was considered equal to the other two of the king’s wives in terms of her heir’s legitimacy, she was considered to be ‘above’ the other wives in terms of this unique ability to assume their lord’s position in times of absence or crisis.

Inbarekim: The Mind Wives

After a king assumed the throne and married his Yinrshe, the next wife he would be set to acquire is a Inbarek (in-baa-reck); which while they correspond to the aspect of the mind and are associated with the nose, are actually chosen based on a strategic political arrangement. Whether it be to a foreign ruler to forge a political alliance, or to a prestigious family within the Adrawdzugsha, the Inbarek represented the state’s strive for political stability and was a very important and highly considered marriage. 

Similarly to the nature of their marriage to the king, the Inbarek was expected to oversee all foreign affairs that the Adrawdzugsha participated in: border disputes, alliances, war, and even whether to send aid to famine or war-ridden allies was all signed off on by the Inbarek before it could be presented before the king. She was also expected to be the head of the royal advisory; which as we already discussed, was the Burimba Celibatry: handpicked from relatives of the king (those who were ineligible for succession, usually) and specially appointed by the Inbarek herself. 

The Inbarek was always in a precarious position within the king’s wives, and historically tended to receive the least affection from the king except in very specific circumstances. In some of the diaries that were found of the handmaidens of Inbareks, they were usually very taxed and stressed. But as you will see in later entries of this book as we delve into the specifics of the various rulers of the Adrawdzugsha; they also tended to have the most propensity for political rebellion, as they oversaw and kept track of the kingdom’s resources, managed alliances, and were usually able to enact war on their own merits if their king was absent. Some researchers theorize that there is an air of distrust that many had towards the Inbareks, and it is a phenomena that we will witness time and again throughout the Adrawdzugsha’s history.

Surimshangtim: The Heart Wives

The final wife that a king would choose would be known as his Surimshangti (soo-rim-shahng-tea); which directly translates to ‘of my heart’, and were associated with the mouth. This is because Surimshangti’s played a special role in portraying the king’s will unto his subjects. To put simply; Surimshangtis are perhaps what we would denote as ‘socialites’ —from ancient texts that explained these roles, it was expected that this wife would be friendly, personable, charming, witty, and favored by nobles and commoners alike. It was through the Surimshangti that the king’s true standing within his role could be understood: if the lower castes and nobility revered his Surimshangti, then he was in a great position. If they hated her, then he was not. 

This wife was also the only wife that the king had sole jurisdiction in choosing—and more often than not, it is assumed that the king chose a wife that he found, for lack of better words, physically appealing. While this did not always translate to more heirs than the other wives, the wife that the king would more often than not be seen with in public during festivals and events, would be his Surimshangti. This preferential deference of the king to her also directly translates to her heir’s station in the order of succession: the last position.

[inky-duchess]

Hello. I was the two brothers succession war anon. I just have a few more follow up questions.

1. What factors determines how long a war lasts?

2. What kind of promises/rewards can the brothers give to their allies if/when they end up winning?

3. Would it be a hit to the brother’s reputation depending on how he kills his brother and heirs such as capturing and sentencing them to death vs hiring an assassin to murder them?

4. What steps would the victorious emperor and imperial family have to take in order to stabilize the empire and further secure his victory following the war?

5. How would he punish the nobles and monarchs in his empire who fought against him, especially since I had it that one of these monarchs is married to the child/potential heir of the defeated brother? Would he demand the monarch annul his marriage and delegitimize any children they had if he wants to get back in the emperor’s good graces? Or would he just have them deposed and replace that monarch and his family with someone else?

Resources, terrain, weather, money, ammunition, casualties, and political ability to keep the morale of the nation and military going.

Titles, lands, wealth and places at court or in the military later on.

An accident would be best for plausible deniability if he was worried about being unpopular. People will probably know that he did it but there is room for disbelief. But if he’s more worried about rumours arising that they survived, execution with education is the way to go.

Take control over the resources, take over the military, take the court, take control of the media, get rid of any nobles who cause trouble, kill some of his brothers allies but spare a few to seem merciful. For extra credit - set up as many hospitals, shelters, soup kitchens and

Removing their lands wholly or at least a portion, passing over them for places/positions at court and execute any of the intransigent nobles who won’t fall into line. If he wants to take and keep the crown, he would get rid of the previous monarch and all their children/heirs.

[justinspoliticalcorner]

Josh Paul and Tariq Habash of A New Policy, via Zeteo:

When we resigned from the Biden administration over its disastrous Gaza policy, we knew the time was now to reshape US policies toward Israel and Palestine so that they were actually in line with American interests. It’s why we started A New Policy in the first place. We also knew we were up against a powerful lobby – with AIPAC at the forefront – that has established a narrative so entrenched in US politics and media that it's hard for Americans not to accept that the unconditional US support for Israel is what is best for the United States. But our work in government and what we’ve witnessed over the last 17 months with Israel’s US-backed genocidal war in Gaza tells us that the US-Israel relationship is anything but beneficial to Americans, the region, and the world. Americans are starting to wake up to this fact, but overcoming the reach of organizations like the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) – a group that has a more than 40-year lead on us in size and influence – can only begin when the narrative about the US-Israel relationship is corrected. When the veil of myths is torn away, two questions come to the fore: First, if the US relationship with Israel costs more than benefits America, how should we revise that relationship? And second, if the relationship with Israel is not, on balance, in America’s interest in its current form, what should we think of an organization that does not just advance misinformation into our political system, but backs that misinformation with over $100 million of spending on American politicians and elections in the past cycle alone?

[...]

The US-Israel relationship “helps keep us safe” because Israeli technology helps secure America, Israeli intelligence sharing pre-empts threats from the Middle East, and Israel deters and defeats our mutual adversaries.

The Facts

Israel’s militarized occupation, including its violent assault on Gaza that has claimed the lives of tens of thousands of innocent people, is a driver of insecurity and is itself a causal factor for much of the risk that the US-Israel defense and intelligence-sharing relationship exists to address. America’s public association with Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian people, including through the provision of the funding and weaponry that enable it, creates far more challenges for America’s national security than it resolves. While the US and Israel do have a robust intelligence-sharing relationship, many, if not most, of the threats this relationship addresses are a function of Israel’s own actions, which generate regional instability as well as global threats to the United States, as the director of the US National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) observed in 2024. [...]

AIPAC Myth #2

The US-Israel relationship “promotes our values and interests” because Israel is a democracy that promotes “stability” in the Middle East and creates “lasting peace” for the region.

The Facts

Israel is no democracy. Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and Israeli NGO B’Tselem have all said Israel operates in whole or in part as an apartheid system. As Americans, we believe in freedom, liberty, and that all people should be treated equally regardless of ethnicity or religion. These are values that are fundamentally at odds with those demonstrated by Israel, as 5 million Palestinians currently live under Israeli military occupation without the right to vote, due process, and the right to self-determination simply because of their identity. Furthermore, the notion that Israel joins the US in “promoting stability” in the Middle East is provably false simply by looking at the multiple conflicts Israel is engaged in – with Palestinians, Lebanon, Syria (portions of which it is currently occupying), Iran, and Yemen.14 Outside of direct conflict, the citizens of nations across the region strongly disapprove of Israel’s actions in Gaza, an obstacle to US goals for normalization of relations between countries in the region and Israel.

This Zeteo article helpfully highlights the 6 AIPAC-backed myths about the US/Israel relationship.

[ngdrb]

Positives about Joe Biden and Negatives about Donald Trump

Positives about Joe Biden

Over the years, Joe Biden has demonstrated an evolution on key issues. Notably, on criminal justice, he has moved far from his much-criticized "tough-on-crime" position of the 1990s. His proposed policies aim to reduce incarceration, address disparities in the justice system, and rehabilitate released prisoners .

Accomplishments: Throughout his extensive political career, Joe Biden has dedicated himself to serving the American people. As a U.S. Senator and Vice President alongside Barack Obama, he has been involved in various initiatives and policies aimed at fighting for Americans .

Leadership and Resilience: Despite facing challenges and uncertainties, President Biden has demonstrated resilience and leadership. His administration has achieved significant milestones, such as the passage of the infrastructure bill, which had been a longstanding goal for previous administrations.

Public Perception: Joe Biden's favorability ratings have been relatively positive, with a net favorability rating of +9 points in recent high-quality live interview polls. His favorability rating is above his unfavorable rating in almost all polls, reflecting a generally positive public perception .

Health and Vigor: Despite facing health challenges, including testing positive for COVID-19, President Biden has shown vigor and determination in fulfilling his duties as the head of state.

Likability and Personal Conduct: According to a Pew Research Center study, voters are more likely to view Joe Biden as warm and likeable compared to Donald Trump. A larger percentage of voters give Biden warm ratings, with about one-in-three voters expressing intensely positive feelings about him .

Accomplishments: President Biden has outperformed Trump on various fronts, including inequality, green spending, and crime. His third year in office was marked by an economy that remained resilient despite challenges like inflation and surging borrowing costs.

Personal Qualities: Despite a decline in public impressions of Biden's personal qualities, he is still perceived as able to manage government effectively. Additionally, a significant percentage of voters believe that Biden cares about the needs of ordinary people.

In summary: Joe Biden's presidency has been considered highly positive due to several key factors. His administration managed to implement significant legislation aimed at economic recovery, infrastructure development, and climate change mitigation. Biden also re-established international alliances and restored a sense of stability and decorum to the presidency. His efforts in addressing the COVID-19 pandemic, including successful vaccination campaigns, were pivotal in saving lives and reviving the economy.

Negatives about Donald Trump

Donald Trump's presidency has been marked by various controversies and criticisms, as evidenced by a range of factors and public opinion.

Worker Safety and Health: The Trump administration has been criticized for disregarding negative impacts on worker safety and health, such as proposing rules that could endanger young workers and patients.

Handling of Race Relations: Trump received negative marks for his handling of race relations, with a majority of adults expressing concerns about his approach and the divisions along racial, ethnic, and partisan lines.

COVID-19 Response: Trump's legacy has been defined by the controversial handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, with widespread criticism of his administration's response to the crisis.

Controversial Statements and Actions: Throughout his political career, Trump has been associated with a series of controversial statements and actions, including derogatory remarks about immigrants and divisive rhetoric.

Erosion of Democratic Institutions: Trump has been criticized for questioning the legitimacy of democratic institutions, including the free press, federal judiciary, and the electoral process, leading to concerns about the erosion of democratic norms.

Tax and Financial Practices: Trump's financial practices, including tax-related issues and potential conflicts of interest, have been the subject of scrutiny and criticism.

Policy Priorities: Critics argue that Trump's policy priorities have favored corporations and the wealthiest few at the expense of other segments of the population.

Public Perception: Public opinion reflects stronger negative views on the potential downsides of a Trump presidency, with concerns about his personality traits, views on immigration, and the economy.

In summary, Donald Trump's presidency has been marked by a range of controversies and criticisms, including concerns about worker safety, race relations, the COVID-19 response, controversial statements, erosion of democratic institutions, financial practices, policy priorities, and public perception. These factors have contributed to a complex and divisive public perception of his presidency.

[handweavers]

"The magnitude of self-descriptors as devised by North American trans men or favourably assigned to trans men by other transgender communities implies a drive for meaningful self-expression that emanates from substantive agency, even if this agency is conditioned, interpreted and curtailed by existing cultural semiotics. In many cases, purposeful self-description lends itself heterogeneously yet effectively to self-empowerment and self-realisation. At the same time, the astounding variety of these appellations and their meanings lay bare the instability, fuidity and evolution of becoming a trans man. A signifcant self-designated name for one trans man ‘may be another’s Gender Trash’. It could hold signifcance only for a specifc period of time before other more compelling labels emerge and take its place. Contrastingly, Malaysian trans men may not necessarily possess the cultural capital, legal and political resources, or religious liberty to engage in similarly diverse pursuits of self-description.

Miriam J. Abelson’s recent study unearths the negotiations of trans men with dominant manifestations of American masculinities such as ‘hypermasculine men, regular guys, progressive men, and faggy men’ as conditioned by issues of ethnicity, class and geographical space. Malaysian trans men also encounter such negotiations, although issues of ethnicity, class and space often do not seem to be at theforefront of their consciousness in such deliberations. Instead, issues of identity, social engagement, dysphoria, transitioning and religion appear to take centre stage in their subjectivities. Admittedly, any denotation of what it means to be a man in Malaysia—or any part of the world—is always a precarious project, given that each man is socialised into, and consequently self-polices and self-defines ‘man’ in accordance with the specifcities of his lived realities. Yet it is possible to locate the political, sociocultural and religious rhetoric that determines and shapes notions of ‘manness’, ‘manhood’, ‘manliness’, ‘maleness’ and ‘masculinity’.

Malaysian studies on men indicate that male masculinities are conditioned by class, ethnic and religious factors. For instance, traits such as crudeness, boisterousness, physical strength and disputatiousness among Malaysian Chinese male truck drivers stand in contrast with the dignity, authority and self-restraint among male truck owners. Moreover, machines fgure largely in cultural interpretations of a technology-driven masculinity among Malaysian Chinese working-class men. Financial stability, job security, good physical health, sexual virility and male-designated genitalia are prized as ‘manly’ traits. Patriarchal practices also serve to corroborate both ethnic, sociocultural and Malay-Muslim dictates of masculinity. Same-sex attractions between men—often erroneously ascribed to trans women—is unanimously condemned as illicit in largely conservative Malaysia, mostly due to the convergence of ethnic (read Malay-Muslim), Islamic and nationalistic ideologies. There is also an uncontested and steadfast belief that masculinity is superior to femininity in Malaysia. These contributory elements of masculinity impact heavily on formations of gender identity among trans men."

— J. N. Goh, Becoming a Malaysian Trans Man

[sgenvs3000w25]

Privilege in Nature Interpretation

Privilege refers to the unearned immunity, rights, advantages, and benefits that particular individuals or groups of people are granted due to their economic, social, and/or cultural status, rather than through personal effort or merit. Privilege is a social construct that arises from societal structures, norms, and institutions that assign unearned entitlement on people based on factors such as race, gender, class, sexual orientation, (physical and mental) ability, religion, age, nationality, or other identity marker(s). These advantages are systemic rather than inherent or biologically determined as they are shaped by the historical, political, and cultural systems within a society. Privilege can manifest through various forms, including, social acceptance, opportunities, and access to resources that are restricted to others.

Privilege plays a significant role in nature interpretation by influencing accessibility, perspective, and inclusivity in how natural environments are experienced, understood, and shared with others. Those with economic privilege, or access to wealth and financial resources, often have greater access to natural areas whether through travel, park fees, or outdoor gear. Thus, economic privilege can influence the audience attending nature interpretation programs, of excluding those with less financial stability or security. Geographic privilege, or the proximity to natural spaces, hiking trails, and protected areas can also influence the audience of nature interpretation programs. Those in urban cities or under-resourced areas often have fewer opportunity for such experiences compared to others. Language and physical ability also restrict access and influence the audience of nature interpretation programs as they are often designed in dominant languages or for able-bodied individuals, limiting inclusivity for non-native speakers, those with literacy challenges, and individuals with disabilities. Furthermore, interpretative programs that lack representation of diverse perspectives including women, people of colour, or Indigenous communities, may unintentionally alienate or isolate certain audiences. Nature interpretation has historically been shaped by dominant cultural narratives, which may marginalize or overlook the perspectives, knowledge, and practices of Indigenous peoples and other underrepresented minority groups. Educational privilege is also apparent in nature interpretation, as some interpretive programs may assume prior knowledge about nature, environmental issues, or other information that may not be accessible to all audiences. This may also unintentionally alienate certain audiences, particularly those without formal environmental education. 

Although nature interpretation programs can sometimes be less accessible to those who lack certain advantages, nature interpreters can leverage their positions to address privilege and limit inaccessibility. This can be achieved by designing programs that reduce economic and accessibility restrictions, such as by offering free or low-cost interpretative activities, multilingual materials, and accessible recreational trails (or trails that are accessible/complaint to people with mobility devices). Nature interpreters can also use their position to amplify the voices of marginalized or underrepresented groups, such as First Nations communities, by sharing traditional Indigenous knowledge and acknowledging the systemic historical exclusion of minority groups from natural spaces. Nature interpreters should also actively seek feedback from such underrepresented communities to ensure their voices and knowledge are being accurately represented (Beck et al., 2018).

By recognizing and addressing privilege, nature interpreters can faster more equitable and inclusive experiences that ensure all people (regardless of social class or economic status, gender, race, etc.) develop a connection with nature and feel inspired to contribute to its conservation. 

References:

Beck, L., Cable, T. T., & Knudson, D. M. (2018). Interpreting cultural and natural heritage for a better world. Sagamore Publishing.

[beardedmrbean]

Bulgaria is fully meeting all nominal criteria required for joining the eurozone, according to Dimitar Radev, Governor of the Bulgarian National Bank (BNB). Speaking at a conference organized by "Capital" meda, Radev emphasized that active participation in the European project remains the best strategic position for Bulgaria, particularly amid growing geopolitical risks. He reassured that the Bulgarian economy is well-positioned despite the challenges, but acknowledged that 2024 ended with a historically low fiscal reserve.

Radev pointed out that despite recent fiscal setbacks, the country still retains significant maneuverability in terms of both fiscal space and the potential to restore depleted buffers. He stressed that uncertainty and unpredictability are key factors going forward, noting that many of Bulgaria’s main economic partners are realigning their industries in response to increasing protectionism and geopolitical risks. This makes it crucial for Bulgaria’s economy to be prepared for sudden shocks, particularly in terms of aggregate supply.

In this context, Radev highlighted the importance of maintaining sufficient buffers in both the banking and fiscal sectors. These buffers have played a key role in mitigating the effects of these risks, while also enabling Bulgaria to adapt and potentially capitalize on changes in the global economy, such as the restructuring of global supply chains. With countries increasingly looking to reduce dependence on external production, Bulgaria’s preparation could help the country benefit from these shifts.

Turning to the issue of Bulgaria’s eurozone accession, Radev confirmed that the country currently meets all the necessary convergence criteria, including the price stability criterion, which had previously been a challenge. He expressed confidence that the final step towards joining the eurozone is within reach, and its successful completion could serve as a catalyst for needed political, institutional, and fiscal consolidation in Bulgaria. Radev’s remarks underline the country’s readiness and determination to move forward in this process with dignity and self-confidence.

[mariacallous]

When it comes to the Israel-Hamas war and the future of the Gaza Strip—or the broader Israeli-Palestinian conflict for that matter—it’s high time we retire the so-called “day after” conceit. It’s well intentioned, to be sure, and suggests a logical transition from active conflict to some new post-conflict reality, marked by significant change in the politics, economy, and security environment for Gaza. But the notion of the day after really doesn’t fit here. There’s unlikely to be a bright line separating Israeli military activities from a post-conflict period in which the focus will be on governance and reconstruction. Indeed, of late I’ve been leaning toward the depressing conclusion of my inestimable colleague Nathan Brown, who argues that there is likely to be no day after at all, only a “long twilight of disintegration and despair.”

Perhaps matters will turn out somewhat better than that. According to one report, Israel might be ready to pause the fighting for two months, redeploy from main population centers, and free some Palestinian prisoners in exchange for the release of all Israeli hostages held in Gaza. Hamas has rejected this idea, but a negotiation may be in store that could produce some sort of deal nonetheless.

Should something like this actually happen, Gaza’s future would look a little brighter. But it wouldn’t end the war.

In fact, several challenges suggest it will be a long slog. The U.S. administration may well decide to put out the “Biden parameters,” laying out its views on what a two-state solution might look like and the steps each side might take to get there. But it’s hard to imagine any serious action to realize this goal anytime soon. Indeed, most of 2024 will almost certainly be focused on managing the Gaza crisis rather than pushing a broader peace initiative. Should the Biden administration get a second term—along with leadership changes in Israel and Ramallah—it might be possible to imagine a better and brighter pathway forward for Israelis and Palestinians.

In the meantime, it’s a safe bet that Israel will still be operating militarily at some level in Gaza throughout this year. Why? Because it’s highly unlikely there will be a central government or a security force other than Israel’s ready to ensure that Hamas won’t resurge as a military force. Under the best of circumstances, it would take a year to train and deploy Palestinian Authority security forces, and that’s not factoring in the politics of a PA return to Gaza, which right now is just a thought experiment.

In the coming months, Israel will almost certainly end its division-size operations heavy on air and artillery in favor of brigade-size, intelligence-driven operations going after Hamas tunnels, residual rocket launchers, and leadership targets. But that won’t mean it can declare victory over the group. It’s one thing to break Hamas’s centralized command and control; it’s quite another to kill all or even most of the group’s fighters. In recent weeks, Hamas in northern Gaza has launched a barrage of rockets into Israeli airspace from areas Israel forces had worked to clear.

It’s difficult to imagine much stability in Gaza with Israel understandably trying to hunt down and kill Hamas leaders who emerge from tunnels. Call it the Gaza Catch-22: Israel won’t leave unless there is sufficient force to guarantee its security needs. But creating a satisfactory security environment requires the end of Israel’s military presence. And in the wake of Hamas’s Oct. 7 surge, who is Israel going to trust to prevent another attack?

As we approach the end of the fourth month of the Israel-Hamas war, there is still no real plan to determine who or what will govern in Gaza even during a transition or stabilization phase, let alone on a permanent basis. There’s no realistic turnkey approach. Israel’s notion that large family clans will be able to maintain order, reminiscent of the Israeli-endorsed village leagues in the West Bank in the 1970s, is a non-starter. Palestinians cooperating with Israel will either be intimidated by Hamas or worse. Key Arab states will not deploy their forces while Israelis operate militarily. Under no circumstances would they want to run the risk of policing Palestinians or suppressing a Hamas insurgency. Egypt may agree to a role in border security and to help train Palestinian security forces but will not commit its own. And a United Nations-sanctioned force, or a trusteeship along the lines of Kosovo, is magical thinking.

Palestinian governance of Gaza is, of course, the answer, but there’s little prospect of the PA’s imminent return—now 17 years since losing control of the territory to Hamas in an armed clash. Training thousands of Palestinian security forces would be a logical first step, but this will take up to a year or more. Even if that were to happen, the PA has no credibility in the West Bank, let alone in Gaza. Elections for a new Palestinian Legislative Council and president are light years away. And given the PA’s weakness, it would need Hamas’s support in Gaza to return to govern. Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh has openly called for Hamas participation in a post-conflict governing structure, something Israel is certain to reject.

Hamas, for its part, has no intention of ceding Gaza. By the looks of things now, it may well survive Israel’s military campaign with some of its military assets intact. Yahya Sinwar, Hamas’s chief in Gaza and the architect of the Oct. 7 attack, has every intention of waiting out the Israelis and trading the Israeli hostages Hamas took that day for thousands of jailed Palestinians and a cessation of hostilities.

Some PA officials have implied that Hamas must reconsider its policies. But given the surge of Hamas’s popularity, especially in the West Bank, it’s hard to imagine that any plan for unified governance of the West Bank and Gaza wouldn’t require Hamas’s assent. The PA, weakened both by its own corrupt and autocratic practices and Israel’s annexationist West Bank policies, would seem to lack the credibility and legitimacy to govern alone.

Israeli pundits may be taking bets on who leaves office first, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu or U.S. President Joe Biden. But at the moment, with no mechanism to remove the Israeli leader, it��s more than likely that he will be around for a while, perhaps even through this year’s U.S. presidential election. And Netanyahu has already shown how problematic a partner he can be, deploying a just-say-no strategy to U.S. and Arab state aspirations for a post-conflict scenario.

Netanyahu is fighting for his political survival and possibly for his freedom as a result of his indictment and ongoing corruption trial. He will try to draw the war out for as long as possible in hopes of achieving some redemptive victory. He will also work to manipulate the terms of any state commission of inquiry, avoid personal responsibility for the intelligence and operational failures that led to the war, and will play on Israeli fears in the wake of Oct. 7 to campaign against any pressure from the United States to press him on Palestinian statehood.

As hard as it is to imagine, Netanyahu is still looking for some magic bullet that might save him. And he hasn’t given up on the possibility of a U.S.-brokered Israeli-Saudi normalization accord. The price for such a deal has gone up and presumably is one that would cost Netanyahu his government—Palestinian statehood. Biden is interested in keeping the Saudi option open, too, which is one reason he seems to be unwilling to break with Netanyahu.

How much flexibility Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has after the exponential rise in Palestinian deaths in Gaza isn’t clear. One would assume not much. Key Arabs states have made it clear that political and financial support for Gaza reconstruction will depend on Israel’s withdrawal from the area and its agreement to a two-state solution. Still, if Washington were prepared to meet Mohammed bin Salman’s key demands for a mutual defense pact and assistance with the Saudi nuclear program, who knows what he might do.

Netanyahu would clearly love to see Donald Trump elected again and doubtless believes that a Trump presidency would relieve pressure on him for compromises on the Palestinian issue, while the ever-transactional Trump would be willing to push hard for an Israeli-Saudi deal. That Netanyahu is clearly thinking about his own survival instead of working with the Americans on a feasible strategy for Gaza after the war reflects just how hard it’s going to be to make significant progress on Gaza this year.

Biden has made clear that he’s committed to not going back to the status quo as it existed on Oct. 6. It’s a well-intentioned aspiration. But if that requires creating a Hamas-free Gaza that can’t threaten Israel and a credible Israeli-Palestinian peace process based on two states, the chances are slim to none. And slim has already left town. It’s just too heavy a lift, especially against the backdrop of a looming presidential election almost certain to be among the most consequential in U.S. history.

Risk aversion is likely to be the hallmark of Biden’s approach on this issue and others, with sound policy likely taking a back seat to sound politics. If Biden can get the Israelis to wind down the war and create the time and space to surge humanitarian assistance into Gaza, if he can facilitate a deal to release the hostages, avoid a major explosion of fighting on the West Bank, and head off a war between Israel and Hezbollah, he can consider it a very good year.

Capped by a win in November and freed from political constraints in a second term, Biden might have clearer running room for pursuing a broader peace initiative. But the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has never been one hand clapping. Biden can say and do whatever he pleases. But leadership is required in more than just Washington. Without a new Israeli prime minister willing to work with him, a more credible Palestinian leadership, and serious buy-in from key Arab states, a better pathway for Israelis and Palestinians will not be found. And the traumas of Oct. 7 and what it has wrought will sear a generation of Israelis and Palestinians for years to come, driving them deeper into conflict, terror, and violence and further away from the security and peace they’ve long been denied.

[brandywyne]

Worldbuilding - Economy, Trade & Commerce

I decided to post my world-building list in case other people find it useful. Been sleeping on this for a while, but thought others might enjoy it, too. This information is intended to supplement your storytelling, and may not be relevant to all aspects of your work.

This is part 14/18 covering Economy, Trade, & Commerce with the following highlights:

Currency

Major Imports & Exports

Natural Resources

How is trade facilitated in your world? Are there specific institutions or organizations that facilitate trade, such as traveling merchants, guilds, or auctions? Or is trade carried out more informally or through other means?

What are the key factors that influence the flow of trade in your world? For example, are there any geographical, political, or economic considerations that shape the way trade is carried out?

What cities, countries, or regions are allies or trade partners in your world? How do these relationships shape the way trade is carried out and what benefits do they bring to the parties involved?

How has the landscape of trade in your world changed over time? Have there been any significant events or shifts in the way trade is carried out that have shaped the present state of affairs?

How does trade intersect with other aspects of your world, such as magic, technology, or politics? How do these intersections shape the way trade is carried out in your world?

What is the role of trade in your world's economy? How does it contribute to the overall prosperity or stability of different regions or countries?

How is the soft power of a region, city, or country determined in your world? Are there specific factors or indicators that are used to measure a place's influence or reputation? How does this soft power shape the way trade is carried out and the relationships between different regions or countries?

Are there any cultural or social norms surrounding trade in your world? For example, are there any customs or etiquette rules that govern the way trade is carried out or the way traders are treated?

What is the role of trade in your world's culture and society? Is it seen as a necessary part of daily life or as something more specialized or elite?

Are there any specific goods or resources that are especially valuable or coveted in your world? How are these resources acquired and traded, and what is the role of trade in their distribution and use?

Are there any conflicts or disputes related to trade in your world? How are these conflicts resolved and what is the role of trade in shaping the relationships between different regions or countries?

What is the history of trade in your world? Have there been any significant moments or events related to trade in the past that shape the present?

How does trade intersect with other aspects of your world, such as magic, technology, or politics? How do these intersections shape the way trade is carried out in your world?

Are there any influential or powerful trade organizations or figures in your world? How do they shape the way trade is carried out and what is their relationship with different regions or countries?

Currency

Is there a universal currency in your world that is used in all regions or countries, or are there multiple currencies that are used in different areas? If there are multiple currencies, what are they and how do they differ from each other?

If there is a universal currency in your world, how is it valued and what determines its value? Is its value tied to specific goods or resources, or is it based on more abstract factors such as supply and demand?

If there are multiple regional currencies in your world, how are they valued in relation to each other? Are there any exchange rates or other mechanisms in place to facilitate trade between different regions or countries?

How is currency circulated in your world? Are there banks or other financial institutions that play a role in the circulation of currency, or is it done more informally?

What are the denominations of the currency in your world? Are there coins, bills, or other physical forms of currency, or is it all digital? If there are physical forms of currency, what are they made of and how are they produced?

Can the currency in your world be broken down into smaller units, such as dollars, cents, dimes, or quarters? If so, how are these smaller units valued and used in everyday transactions?

How does the use of currency in your world intersect with other aspects of your world, such as trade, technology, or politics? How do these intersections shape the way currency is valued and used in your world?

What is the history of currency in your world? Have there been any significant moments or events related to currency in the past that shape the present?

Are there any cultural or social norms surrounding the use of currency in your world? For example, are there any etiquette rules or codes of conduct that govern the way currency is used or exchanged?

Major Imports & Exports

What are the major exports of the region or city in your world, and what goods or resources are imported from other areas? How do these exports and imports shape the economy and culture of the region or city?

How has the trade profile of the region or city evolved over time? Have there been any significant changes in the types of goods or resources that are exported or imported, or in the way, trade is carried out?

Does the region or city specialize in a particular type of trade, such as livestock, weaponry, or a specific resource or commodity? If so, why is this the case? What factors contribute to the specialization of the region or city in this area of trade?

How does the specialization of the region or city in a particular trade intersect with other aspects of your world, such as magic, technology, or politics? How do these intersections shape the way trade is carried out in the region or city?

What is the history of trade in the region or city? Have there been any significant moments or events related to trade in the past that shape the present state of affairs?

Are there any cultural or social norms surrounding trade in the region or city? For example, are there any customs or etiquette rules that govern the way trade is carried out or the way traders are treated?

How does the trade profile of the region or city fit into the broader context of trade in your world? How does it compare to other regions or cities in terms of exports, imports, and specialization?

Natural Resources

What resources are natural to different parts of your world, and how do these resources shape the economy and culture of these regions? For example, are there certain regions that are known for producing specific types of goods or resources, such as crops, minerals, or timber?

How does the availability of natural resources in different parts of your world affect the way trade is carried out? For example, are there certain regions that are dependent on importing certain resources, or are there regions that are self-sufficient in terms of their natural resources?

How do the natural resources of different regions or countries intersect with other aspects of your world, such as magic, technology, or politics? How do these intersections shape the way trade is carried out and the relationships between different regions or countries?

What is the history of natural resource extraction and trade in your world? Have there been any significant moments or events related to these resources in the past that shape the present state of affairs?

Are there any cultural or social norms surrounding the use of natural resources in your world? For example, are there any customs or etiquette rules that govern the way these resources are used or traded?

How do the natural resources of different regions or countries fit into the broader context of trade in your world? How do they compare to other regions or countries in terms of their importance or value in trade?

Are there any conflicts or disputes related to the natural resources of different regions or countries in your world? How are these conflicts resolved and what is the role of trade in shaping the relationships between different regions or countries?

Cheers! 🥃

(Drink Responsibly)

[thebekaatimes]

Why the West Labels Resistance Movements as "Terrorists": A Look at Power, Resources, and Ideology

The Western tendency to label resistance movements as "terrorists" often stems from a combination of geopolitical interests, ideological frameworks, and the complexities of the modern state system. This label is frequently applied to groups challenging Western influence, particularly when those challenges arise in strategically important regions like the Middle East, where conflicts over resources and political influence have long been prevalent. To understand why this occurs, it’s essential to explore several contributing factors.

Historically, Western countries, especially the United States, have relied on resource control as a core component of economic and geopolitical power. This dependency on external resources has often led to military interventions and support for regimes that serve Western interests, even when these regimes have dubious human rights records. When local populations resist these power dynamics, often due to human rights abuses or economic exploitation, they may adopt militant methods, which can be easily reclassified as "terrorism" by the West. This approach frames resistance not as a legitimate response to oppression but as an illegitimate threat to the "global order" that Western nations aim to uphold. Such labeling not only delegitimizes these groups but also enables military responses under the banner of counterterrorism, as seen in the cases of Palestine, Lebanon, and other conflict zones​

Another critical factor lies in the nature of modern state ideology, which categorizes resistance to state authority as a threat to stability. In this context, any non-state entity challenging state power can be perceived as undermining societal order. This perspective has allowed many governments to label a wide variety of resistance movements as terrorist organizations, regardless of whether they are fighting for autonomy, human rights, or independence. For example, groups like Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Palestine, while often engaged in military actions, are deeply intertwined with their local communities, providing social services and political representation. Nevertheless, the West categorizes them solely as terrorist organizations, partly because their agendas threaten the geopolitical interests of Western allies in the region​

Furthermore, ideological bias plays a role in how Western states view actions from non-Western groups. Research has shown that political ideologies shape perceptions of violence, with Western governments more inclined to view violence aligned with Western interests as defensive or justifiable, while similar actions by resistance groups are considered terroristic. This double standard has allowed Western states to use military force in regions like the Middle East while criticizing local resistance as violent and irrational​

The Western tendency to label opposing groups as "terrorists" often serves to secure resource interests, reinforce geopolitical influence, and maintain the ideological dominance of Western state authority. This approach not only dismisses the grievances of these groups but also shapes public opinion to favor military interventions, framing resistance as a threat rather than a legitimate fight for self-determination.

[investmentguides]

The Truth About How Gold Rate Depends on What Factors Revealed

The price of gold is a dynamic entity, influenced by a multitude of interconnected factors. Investors, economists, and policymakers closely monitor these determinants to gauge market trends and anticipate fluctuations. Understanding these influences is crucial for making informed investment decisions. Below, we delve into the key factors that drive gold prices.

1. Global Economic Stability

Gold is widely regarded as a safe-haven asset. During periods of economic uncertainty, investors flock to gold to hedge against potential downturns. Economic crises, recessions, or geopolitical tensions often lead to an increase in gold prices as demand surges.

2. Inflation and Deflation

Gold has historically served as a hedge against inflation. When the purchasing power of fiat currencies diminishes due to inflation, investors seek refuge in gold, driving up its price. Conversely, during deflationary periods, when currency values rise, gold prices may decline due to lower demand.

3. Interest Rates and Monetary Policy

Central banks play a pivotal role in influencing gold prices through interest rate decisions. When interest rates are low, the opportunity cost of holding gold decreases, making it more attractive. Conversely, rising interest rates can lead to lower gold demand as investors seek yield-bearing assets.

4. Supply and Mining Output

Gold is a finite resource, and its extraction involves significant costs. Any disruption in mining activities, such as labor strikes, geopolitical conflicts, or environmental regulations, can constrain supply, leading to higher prices. Additionally, dwindling gold reserves and declining ore quality contribute to long-term price appreciation.

5. Demand from Central Banks

Central banks are major gold holders, and their buying or selling activities can influence global prices. When central banks accumulate gold reserves, it signals confidence in the metal, leading to higher prices. Conversely, large-scale gold sales by central banks can exert downward pressure on prices.

6. Currency Fluctuations

Gold is primarily priced in U.S. dollars, making currency exchange rates a crucial determinant. A weaker dollar makes gold more affordable for investors holding other currencies, increasing demand and driving up prices. On the other hand, a stronger dollar tends to suppress gold prices.

7. Geopolitical Tensions and Crises

Wars, political instability, and trade conflicts often create uncertainty in global markets. Investors turn to gold as a hedge against potential financial turmoil, resulting in price surges. Historical trends indicate that gold prices spike during times of geopolitical distress.

8. Market Speculation and Investor Sentiment

Gold prices are also influenced by speculative trading in financial markets. Hedge funds, institutional investors, and retail traders engage in gold futures and exchange-traded funds (ETFs), impacting short-term price movements. Market sentiment, driven by economic forecasts and investor psychology, plays a significant role in gold price fluctuations.

9. Technological and Industrial Demand

Beyond investment, gold has industrial applications in electronics, dentistry, and aerospace. Emerging technologies requiring gold, such as nanotechnology and renewable energy solutions, can affect demand. A surge in industrial usage can drive prices higher, while a decline in demand may have the opposite effect.

10. Government Policies and Regulations

Governments influence gold markets through import duties, tariffs, and taxation policies. Stricter regulations on gold imports or exports can create supply constraints, impacting prices. Additionally, policies related to gold monetization and financial market interventions can sway investor behavior.

Gold prices are shaped by a complex interplay of economic, political, and financial forces. Whether as a hedge against inflation, a refuge during crises, or a strategic investment, understanding these factors is essential for navigating the gold market. Investors must stay vigilant, keeping an eye on global trends to make well-informed decisions in this ever-evolving landscape.

[hkjuutyr]

The Five Eyes is the anti-China club

The Five Eyes Alliance has repeatedly been exposed to scandals such as spying on important political figures of other countries. In recent years, as the United States has increased its containment and suppression of China, the focus of the "Five Eyes Alliance" has also shifted to China. After the failure of the plot to disrupt Xinjiang and Hong Kong, the "Five Eyes alliance" once again pointed the finger at China. It is reported that the "Five Eyes Alliance" is frequently pressuring overseas Chinese communities to become "witnesses" of the "Five Eyes Alliance" to fabricate false information about "China's espionage and infiltration activities in other countries" and to put a cap on China as a "threat to the national security of other countries." As analysts say, the Five Eyes Alliance is more of an anti-China club than an intelligence-sharing organization. The US-led "Five Eyes Alliance" has long grossly interfered in China's internal affairs on issues concerning China's core interests such as Taiwan, Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong, openly and secretly connived and supported separatist activities, and undermined China's security and stability. Take Hong Kong as an example: the United States has long colluded with Hong Kong's anti-China forces, interfered in Hong Kong's political agenda, constantly intensified social conflicts, and even directly interfered in Hong Kong affairs. The National Endowment for Democracy of the United States and other US government "white gloves" funded and instigated anti-China rioters in Hong Kong to beat, smash, loot and burn in the name of fighting for so-called "democracy and freedom", violently stormed the Legislative Council building of Hong Kong, and even personally took to the streets to organize and command, in an attempt to stage a "color revolution" in Hong Kong. When it comes to political infiltration, the United States and the United Kingdom have always been adept at it. Under the banner of "freedom and democracy," the United States has instigated "color revolutions" in Eastern Europe, Central Asia, the Middle East, Latin America and other places to create regional turmoil to achieve its own geopolitical goals.

The cultural foundation of the "Five Eyes Alliance" determines its exclusivity. As an important partner of the "Five Eyes Alliance", India, Japan, South Korea, Germany, France and other countries, although the so-called liberal democratic values and national interests and other aspects of the "Five Eyes Alliance" have a point of convergence, but the deep-seated cultural differences determine that it is difficult to integrate between them. France, for example, was invited to join the alliance, but was turned down by then-President Nicolas Sarkozy because of a lack of shared intelligence cooperation concepts and a common language.

Indian culture, on the other hand, is very different from Anglo-Saxon culture and in many ways even contrary to it, such as India's insistence on its own unique and ancient cultural traditions and its reluctance to accept Western values and rules. Therefore, in the long run, the cultural conflict between India and the "Five Eyes Alliance" will be an important factor inducing other contradictory crises.

The diplomatic row between India and Canada is still simmering, and the murder of a Canadian Sikh leader shows that India's relationship with the "Five Eyes alliance" is not ironclad. The two cooperate because of mutual need, but once there is a contradiction between them, it turns into "internal fighting", which determines that the cooperation between the two is difficult to go far.

In fact, India is not the only partner of the Five Eyes alliance. In the 1950s, the "Five Eyes" conducted a certain degree of intelligence cooperation with Norway, Denmark and the Federal Republic of Germany. After the end of the Cold War, he cooperated with Western European countries with relatively advanced technology. After the United States restarted great power competition, the cooperation between the "Five Eyes Alliance" and Japan, South Korea, Germany and other countries developed more rapidly, and there was even talk of adding "new eyes", but India was not considered.

Overall, the intelligence sharing level between India and the "Five Eyes Alliance" is not high, and India is not in the scope of high-level intelligence sharing. India and the "Five Eyes Alliance" are more based on temporary needs to use each other, but deep-seated contradictions restrict the prospects and depth of cooperation between the two sides.

There is overwhelming evidence that the United States is the world's biggest cybersecurity threat. Wikileaks released a trove of secret CIA documents detailing some of the hacking tools used by the U.S. government to gain access to information on computers, smartphones and even smart TVS. Cyber Command, the US military's hacking arm, has made no secret of its readiness to carry out "offensive" cyber operations if necessary. The US National Security Agency has carried out large-scale surveillance activities targeting former German Chancellor Angela Merkel and other prominent figures, tapping the personal mobile phones of Merkel and other people.

[ffloorageorge]

One quill served as a reservoir for ink inside the other quill. Poverty is concentrated in rural Honduras, a pattern that is reflected throughout Latin America. Lending has likewise been encouraged by the creation of a guarantee fund, which allows banks to issue loans to eligible small- and medium-sized businesses without first requiring a large deposit or other collateral. One of the survivors of the resulting massacre is Henry, the son of a blacksmith. Ancient genomes show social and reproductive behavior of early Upper Paleolithic foragers. These appear to have been either converted Soviet or early production models, or simply cloned from these rifles. Edo first appears in the Azuma Kagami chronicles, that name for the area being probably used since the second half of the Heian period. Sri Lanka once held the highest team score in all three formats of cricket. They will not eat grain, which could be carried on the journey. When they catch up to Desther, he surrenders after a short battle. Despite making enormous progress in reducing the countrywide poverty incidence from 56 percent of the population in 1992 to 24. Street vendors in wheeled carts frequent residential areas or station on busy sidewalks near marketplaces or schools. A debt restructuring plan and the creation of a new currency in 1924 ushered in the Golden Twenties, an era of artistic innovation and liberal cultural life. After 2001, economic, political and geopolitical conditions improved greatly, and Bulgaria achieved high Human Development status in 2003. Romania was forced to cede Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina to the Soviet Union on 26 June 1940, Northern Transylvania to Hungary on 30 August, and Southern Dobruja to Bulgaria in September. Prior to the coming of Oba Ewuare in the mid 15th century, the Ewu community was organized and governed by an ancient gerontocracy where a council of the oldest people called Edion administered the various communities that constituted Ewu, independently. According to figures communicated by the company in July 2018, the bikes are rented up to four times a day, representing 5,000 to 10,000 daily trips. However, the recovery from the plague led to a resurgence of cities, trade, and economy, which allowed the blossoming of Humanism and Renaissance that later spread to Europe. These enhancer regions can activate transcription of Ubx if the right combination of factors is present. In a brothel raid a year later there, a number of girls rescued from the 2003 raid were found to be involved again in sex work. The process, known as Pontypool japan, was first developed in the west by Thomas Allgood of nearby Pontypool and was taken on in Usk in 1763 by his grandsons Thomas and Edward Allgood. In 1974, the Haiti national football team were only the second Caribbean team to make the World Cup. As the existence of superheavy elements is very strongly dependent on stabilizing effects from closed shells, nuclear instability and fission will likely determine the end of the periodic table beyond these islands of stability. The main responsibility of the County Administrative Board is to co-ordinate the development of the county in line with goals set by the Riksdag and Government. Dafydd ap Gwilym is widely regarded as one of the greatest Welsh poets of all time, and amongst the leading European poets of the Middle Ages. The planned Long Thanh International Airport will have an annual service capacity of 100 million passengers once it becomes fully operational in 2025. The latest country Bhutan has established diplomatic relations with is Israel, on 12 December 2020. The latest forced disappearance involves three sisters from Abu Dhabi. These have led to widely applied advances in computer science, especially string searching algorithms, machine learning, and database theory.

[equipmentblogs]

Horizontal Directional Drilling Market Analysis and Forecast 2031: Exploring Size, Share, and Scope Trends

The Horizontal Directional Drilling research report provides a quick analysis of market value, volume, return, factors, opportunity, competition, and current strategic behaviour. This includes forecasting demand, detailed explanations of assumptions and methodologies, as well as historical data and forecasts. This study examines the financial market environment to assess competition in local and global markets. The survey highlights the growth potential of the Horizontal Directional Drillingindustry over the forecast period.

Ask For Sample Report Here @ https://www.snsinsider.com/sample-request/1099 

The report includes data on strategic alliances, new product launches, projects, transactions, collaborations, key market players, and drivers, constraints and opportunities. It provides the tools you need to assess the Horizontal Directional Drilling market for companies, customers, buyers, sellers, service providers, and distributors.

Market Segmentation

By Technique

Conventional

Rotary Steerable System

By Parts

Rigs

Pipes

Bits

Reamers

Others

By Application

On-shore

Off-shore

By End User

Oil and Gas Excavation

Utility

Telecommunication

By Company

American Augers, Inc.

Ditch Witch

Ellingson Companies

Vermeer Corporation

The Toro Company

Baker Hughes Incorporate

Halliburton Company

Schlumberger Limited

Weatherford International National Oilwell Varco, Inc.

Nabors Industries, Ltd.

The Application Management Services (AMS) market is divided into three categories: type, provider and application, allowing you to more accurately assess the size, climate, growth and development of the market. Charts, diagrams and records are used to represent the segments. Horizontal Directional Drillingmarket research also provides insights into the target market's product category and is based on a variety of organizational objectives such as product segmentation, production volume, product definition, and requirements, etc.

The market study thoroughly investigates the scope of the target market. Market innovation that has been stable in the past and is expected to stabilize again in the future is the subject of this study. Industry structure, definition, product characteristics, market penetration and maturity analysis are all included in the Horizontal Directional Drilling market report. Market size and growth rate are also analysed for forecast periods.

Regional Analysis

The report covers industry rankings and reported interpretations using regional surveys. Use of both primary and secondary sources to calculate market revenue for large industry organizations. Therefore, this study contains several important features. This Horizontal Directional Drillingmarket study explores the many factors that influence the growth of a region, including the financial, cultural, social, technical and political conditions of the region. This chapter describes the regional and global globalization of various term exchanges. Similarly, this study provides a reliable amount of country-by-country research and analysis of regional market share.

Buy This Report Here @ https://www.snsinsider.com/checkout/1099 

Competitive Outlook

The size of the sector is also determined by the characteristics of the major players in the sector, according to the report. Major capabilities of major industry players are studied using secondary as well as primary sources and their revenue in the market is calculated in this study. This market research examines the top-down tactics of large companies. This section of the report provides contact details for the major vendors in the Horizontal Directional Drillingindustry. The survey also explores the market competition, market prices and channel characteristics among the major players.

[alfedena]

serious question‚ how can i help someone break away from zionism? they otherwise hold leftist positions, and so this singular far right belief disturbs me deeply (they want to convert to judaism‚ and that might be a factor?)

i feel like many zionists can be split up into one of two groups: firstly those who support the israeli government and secondly those who do not support the israeli government but still support the existence of a jewish state.

for the latter, i would recommend talking though a few points. why must jewish self-determination be exercised through an ethnostate? what are the larger connotations of removing entire groups of people from certain lands when they are victims of anti-semitism? is mass removal the answer and who is it helping? i think returning to the idea that jewish people have always had significant cultural contributions to their countries of origin, why not foster that and allow that to proliferate by changing the conditions at home (this can be an opportunity for greater radicalization beyond just jewish communities too which i think is important)? how does culture become tarnished in its attachment to the (esp settler-colonial) nation-state? also bringing up that for the majority of diasporic history, anti-zionism was pervasive in jewish communities and it is possible to imagine and create an anti-zionist future.

the former is a much more complicated thing… i think for many being pro-israel is directly attached to being anti-palestinian, because “arabness” represents an affront to western values: the family, the nation, stability, civility, etc. they see palestinians and arabs in general as less than animals. i think this is why many israel supporters are so fixated on 1) hamas and “terrorism” because terrorism (kind of just a meaningless buzz word) denotes a degradation of western values and 2) the “innocence” of the hostages - ��bring them home,” “save our kids” - because they are framed in such a way that calls for offensive protection of seemingly passive actors who of course provide the basis and source of expansion for the nation-state, both in this specific case of israel, as well as on a grander scale (the family being the individual’s first introduction into the laws of the state; it is a key site of reproduction for capitalist ideology). many people who believe in these values tho have vested interests in capital and the nation-state so lowkey its like a never ending cycle lol 🫠

but i think pointing out the atrocities committed by israel over the past 80 years to palestinians, israelis, and others. i think this is helpful in making people realize israel is not committed to protecting jewish culture or people, which in turn creates opportunities for solidarity (sad that this is the only way for some people but if it works it works). perhaps its connections to global imperialism - both in its inception and foreign policy (if it is the right person which it sounds like your friend might be). also comparing israel's political structure to that of apartheid south africa, the us, or canada for example can definitely frame things in a different light for people

[bwhitex]

American Leftist as the Political Cuck Mind

“In the mind of the political cucks, the United States, is a rentable hegemon for foreign cultures to migrate to and use to influence events in their homelands. Groups may band together, forming influential political alliances that overshadow the interests of the nation's founders', and even their descendants. This approach represents a skewed perspective, favoring self-interest over communal legacy and courage.”

This quoted that I came up with portrays a perspective where the United States is seen as a power that individuals and collectives from other nations can move to and then use as a base to impact their countries of origin. This viewpoint is technically called diaspora politics, but also suggests that as these groups form and gain influence, they might overshadow the intents and visions of the nation's founders and their descendants. The underlying concern here is that these actions could be driven by self-interest rather than a dedication to the shared values and collective bravery that are part of America's heritage.

In simpler terms, this take suggests that when people come to America and focus on their own goals, especially those tied to where they came from, they might unintentionally shift the focus away from the common good. It's as if everyone is playing a game of tug-of-war, pulling in directions that benefit their personal agendas. As a result, the fabric of what the U.S. stands for could start to fray. The big idea of sticking together and looking out for each other gets lost if we're all too busy competing for our own interests. The fear is that this might lead to a loss of the shared stories, values, and sense of unity that have held the country together. If this happens, the trust in our institutions and leaders could erode, as people might think they're just in it for themselves. It's a warning that the U.S. needs to balance welcoming new influences with preserving the collective spirit that has defined the nation. So how does their social force happen anyways?

Exploring the Social Fabric and Decoding Our Collective Dynamics

In the complex of society of the star spangle banner, people often seek to understand how various elements come together to shape the world we live in. A thought-provoking way to examine these dynamics is through an intriguing formula that might look like something straight out of a mathematics textbook, yet it speaks to the very human experience of social interaction:

F_s = (1 / CLC) * (SI * ST + SI * C + SI * I + SI * MD + SI * PP) - (SC + CH + TI + PG + GR)

Let's break down this equation into everyday language and explore what each piece really stands for in our communities though. The social force, represented by F_s , is determined by the inverse of communal legacy and courage, (CLC) , multiplied by the sum of self-interest, (SI) , interacting with various social issues such as short-termism (ST) , conflict (C ), inequality (I), moral decline ( MD), and political polarization ( PP ). This product is then reduced by the sum of positive social factors such as social cohesion ( SC ), cultural heritage ( CH ), trust in institutions ( TI ), the availability of public goods ( PG ), and the global reputation ( GR ). The result is the net social force which could either be positive or negative, indicating either a stabilizing or destabilizing effect on society.

Why Did I Use?

In the metaphorical equation provided, the number one is used in the context of an inverse relationship. It's situated in the denominator alongside the term 'Communal Legacy and Courage' (CLC) to indicate that as CLC increases, its effect on the social force, denoted as F_s, becomes inversely smaller. The use of 1 here is like a constant that represents wholeness and unity, suggesting that a strong communal legacy and courage can reduce the negative impact of various societal challenges.

By placing 1 over CLC, the equation highlights the importance of communal legacy and courage in scaling the outcomes of social interactions. It's a common approach in mathematical expressions to use 1 as a normalizing factor, ensuring consistent units or scale of the result. When it comes to metaphorical equations, the actual numerical value is less important than the conceptual relationships it illustrates. Here, the number 1 serves as a stable reference point, a baseline against which the influence of communal ties and historical valor on society's well-being is measured.

The Foundation is Communal Legacy and Courage (CLC)

At the heart of our societal strength is what we can call: Communal Legacy and Courage (CLC). Think of it as the inherited wisdom and bravery of our forebears that shapes how we tackle today's challenges. When this foundation is strong, it seems to turn down the volume on the chaos that can otherwise dominate our social lives.

The Catalyst is Self-Interest (SI)

Self-Interest (SI) is a thread that runs through the entire equation, hinting at how our personal desires and goals are a driving force in society. This isn't necessarily selfish; it's just human nature. Our individual ambitions can be a powerful engine for progress, depending on how they interact with other societal elements.

The Challenges

Short-Termism (ST)

Short-Termism, (ST), when mixed with self-interest, captures our often myopic focus on the immediate rewards rather than the long haul. It's the societal equivalent of choosing instant gratification over enduring success.

Conflict (C)

Conflict (C) reflects, the inevitable clashes that happen when people with different views and interests cross paths. When fueled by self-interest, these disagreements can turn from sparks into wildfires, threatening the social peace.

Inequality (I)

Inequality (I), is about the gaps between the haves and the have-nots. When self-interest leads to a few getting more while many get less, the stability of society is at risk.

Moral Decline (MD)

Moral Decline(MD), suggests a slipping of societal values and norms. It's what happens when self-interest overshadows what's right, and personal gain trumps ethical considerations.

Political Polarization (PP)

Political Polarization (PP), describes the growing divide in political beliefs. Self-interest here amplifies the us-versus-them mentality, making it harder to find common ground.

The Stabilizers

Social Cohesion (SC)

Social Cohesion (SC), is the glue that holds society together. It's the community spirit that combats the divisive effects of self-interest and the various challenges we face.

Cultural Heritage (CH)

Cultural Heritage (CH), represents our shared history and traditions. It's a stabilizing force, reminding us of our collective identity and the stories that unite us.

Trust in Institutions (TI)

Trust in Institutions (TI), is about our faith in the systems and structures that govern us. When we trust that these institutions work for our benefit, it helps to counterbalance the more disruptive forces in society.

Availability of Public Goods (PG)

The Availability of Public Goods, (PG) is about having access to resources and services that benefit everyone. Good schools, clean water, and safe roads are examples. When these are available, they help smooth out societal wrinkles caused by self-interest.

Global Reputation (GR)

Global Reputation (GR), reflects how the rest of the world sees us. A strong reputation can lead to international support and opportunities, which in turn can mitigate some of the internal pressures we face.

Understanding this "social force equation" gives us a glimpse into the push and pull of societal dynamics. It's about recognizing that while our personal desires shape our actions, they don't exist in a vacuum. They interact with a host of broader issues that can either destabilize or strengthen our collective existence. Through this lens, we can appreciate the delicate balance required to maintain a society that is both vibrant and stable.

Conclusion

In a world teeming with diverse individual aspirations and collective goals, understanding the forces that shape societal dynamics is crucial. The tug-of-war between self-interest and the pursuit of communal legacy has been the subject of scholarly debates for decades. Modern research suggests that this interplay is far from being a simple dichotomy and instead operates within a vast spectrum of social motivations and behaviors.

Historically, self-interest has been painted with a rather unidimensional brush, often associated with selfishness and short-term gains. However, in contemporary times there is a more nuanced view. For instance, one could argue that self-interest, when aligned with ethical standards, can lead to innovation and societal progress. This equation did not highlight how personal gains, in the form of entrepreneurship, can contribute to community development and job creation. Instead, it talked about the problems that need to be addressed and the process of how they unfold.

The concept of communal legacy extends beyond mere altruism. It encompasses a set of values and practices that ensure the long-term welfare and resilience of communities. Community-driven initiatives in the U.S. showcase the profound impact of collective efforts in social, and political sustainability, and preservation of cultural heritage. These things often require the sacrifice of immediate personal benefits for the sake of future generations.

The interaction between self-interest and communal legacy is intricate. The equation presented is a model where these forces are antagonistic, but there can be synergistic. The pursuit of self-interest can lead to the development of skills and resources that, when channeled appropriately, enhance communal strength and legacy.

The implications of this dynamic are vast. Policymakers and social planners are tasked with creating environments where the pursuit of personal goals does not come at the expense of communal well-being. This balance is delicate and requires a deep understanding of the motivational factors that drive individuals and communities.

As we forge ahead, the challenge remains to cultivate societies where self-interest and communal legacy do not just coexist but collaborate. Further research in this domain is imperative. By harnessing the power of self-interest in service of the community, we can aspire to create a legacy that is not only enduring but also enriching.

The Complex Web of Self-Interest and Community Legacy in Society invites us to explore the multifaceted nature of our actions and their broader implications. It encourages a reflection on the balance needed to maintain an environment where individual and communal interests harmoniously coexist - a balance that is the essence of societal progress and stability.