quick doodles i made a few days back
he is so not normal about those spacebuns (how can anyone be normal about mari's spacebuns?)
451 notes
·
View notes
you constantly try to present yourself as someone worthy of existence, yet the fake mess behind it all show through. your hands reach for the ring on your boney fingers and remain there, toying with it constantly. you pretend you are a person but the eyes that watch can see the way your hands are twitching like a broken toy. you know shoving them out of sight will never truly help. yet you do it anyway
150 notes
·
View notes
You know, thinking about it, Marinette and Alya take really different approaches to figuring out who did something, whether they're guilty, etc. And I'm not just talking about with Lila, this was established with Chloe back in Despair Bear.
Denis Damocles: So, some smart aleck had the bright idea of calling the fire department. (the students gasp shocked) Somebody amongst us thought it would be funny to waste the fire captain's valuable time.
Fireman: Yes, in fact, if you wouldn't mind I...
Denis Damocles Hold on! I want the guilty party to apologize to you.
Marinette: (whispers to Alya) I'm sure it was Chloé. I saw her on her phone right before the alarm went off!
Alya: You seeing her make a phone call isn't solid proof.
Marinette: (sighs)
Alya does not like Chloe. She does not think Chloe is a good person. She believes that this is the sort of thing that Chloe would do. But she still isn't going to make the leap that Chloe's definitely guilty, at least when it would involve an actual public confrontation. As Alya pointed out, seeing Chloe on the phone right before ISN'T solid proof. It's evidence, but it's not enough.
And then with Lila, Alya also wants some actual solid evidence before leaping to the conclusion that she's bad or publicly accusing her. While Alya's willing to take positive statements from others at face value or may leap to conclusions if those conclusions aren't too harmful to the person they're about, for anything that would result in an actual accusation, she really wants solid evidence, the kind of thing that you could actually argue in court and not be laughed out for.
Marinette, meanwhile, relies more on prior experience and vibes to determine whether someone is guilty of something. She knows that Chloe's a troublemaker and bully, so if something's gone wrong, she'll immediately conclude that Chloe did it. She knows that Lila's a liar, so she concludes that she's lying about everything (such as her various disabilities and injuries) whether she has evidence of Lila actually lying about that or not. And she knew that Chloe's was a jerk and that her only "friend" Sabrina was an accomplice, so when Chloe spoke positively about her friend and then that friend showed up and appeared to be doing something with gum on her chair, she didn't believe that he was taking the gum off.
It's the two basic methods of determining whodunnit that I see used generally in everyday life. Do you rely on reputation to determine who probably did something, or do you have to wait and try to gather solid evidence that'll hold up better? What's the consequences if you're wrong? And if you're relying on reputation to determine who the culprit is, then you're screwed if someone else has had different experiences with that person than you have, because that's the basis of your argument for them being the culprit.
106 notes
·
View notes
a little appreciation post for mini bunnix, cuz SHE'S GONNA BE IN NEXT SPECIAL
imagine bein average teenage girlie until you get some magic family heirloom stuff from your dad, and then get TIMETRAVEL SUPERPOWER AND ONE YOUR QUESTS IS SAVING THE MOST POWERFUL SUPERHERO OF ALL TIME AND YOUR FUTURE BOSS, who is suddenly YOUR CLASSMATE, AND SHE LOST TWO OF MOST IMPORTANT MIRACULOUS...dang bunnix SLAY
+hc her adult version likes to make fun of her
78 notes
·
View notes
SHE
Juleka my darling!
This was a work in progress for a while but I'm glad I finally got it done!
68 notes
·
View notes