#Six ASEAN Member Nations
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Thailand Visa Exemptions
Thailand, a Southeast Asian nation renowned for its vibrant culture, stunning landscapes, and bustling cities, has long been a popular destination for tourists, business travelers, and expatriates. One of the key factors contributing to its accessibility is the country’s visa exemption policy, which allows nationals of certain countries to enter Thailand without a visa for a limited period. While the concept of visa exemptions may seem straightforward, the intricacies of Thailand’s policies, eligibility criteria, and recent updates warrant a deeper exploration.
Understanding Visa Exemptions
Visa exemptions are agreements between countries that permit their citizens to enter each other’s territories without obtaining a visa beforehand. For Thailand, this means that travelers from eligible countries can enter the country for tourism or certain business purposes without applying for a visa at a Thai embassy or consulate. Instead, they are granted a stay permit upon arrival, typically ranging from 14 to 90 days, depending on their nationality and the purpose of their visit.
It is important to distinguish visa exemptions from visa-on-arrival (VOA) programs. While both allow travelers to enter Thailand without a pre-arranged visa, VOA requires an application process at the port of entry, including payment of a fee and submission of supporting documents. Visa exemptions, on the other hand, are more streamlined, as eligible travelers are automatically granted entry without additional paperwork or fees.
Eligible Countries and Stay Durations
Thailand’s visa exemption policy is not universal; it applies only to citizens of specific countries. As of October 2023, nationals of over 60 countries are eligible for visa-free entry, including the United States, Canada, most European Union member states, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, South Korea, and several ASEAN nations. The duration of stay permitted under the visa exemption scheme varies by nationality:
30-Day Exemption: Most eligible countries, including the United States, Canada, and EU member states, are granted a 30-day stay upon arrival.
90-Day Exemption: A select group of countries, such as Argentina, Brazil, Chile, South Korea, and Peru, enjoy a longer 90-day visa exemption.
It is crucial for travelers to verify their eligibility and the specific duration of stay applicable to their nationality before traveling, as these policies are subject to change.
Entry Requirements for Visa-Exempt Travelers
While visa-exempt travelers are not required to obtain a visa, they must still meet certain entry requirements set by Thai immigration authorities. These include:
Valid Passport: Travelers must possess a passport with at least six months of validity remaining from the date of entry. Some nationalities may be subject to stricter requirements, such as a minimum number of blank pages.
Proof of Onward Travel: Immigration officials may request evidence of a return ticket or an onward journey to another country within the permitted stay period. This is to ensure that travelers do not overstay their visa exemption.
Proof of Sufficient Funds: Travelers may be asked to demonstrate that they have adequate financial means to support themselves during their stay. The required amount is typically 10,000 THB (approximately $300) per person or 20,000 THB per family.
Accommodation Details: While not always enforced, travelers may be asked to provide proof of accommodation, such as a hotel reservation or an invitation letter from a host.
Immigration Screening: Upon arrival, travelers must pass through immigration screening, where officers may ask questions about the purpose of the visit, duration of stay, and other relevant details.
Recent Changes and Updates
Thailand’s visa exemption policies are periodically reviewed and updated to reflect changing diplomatic relations, economic considerations, and security concerns. In recent years, several notable changes have been implemented:
Extension of Stay for Tourism: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Thailand temporarily allowed visa-exempt travelers to extend their stay beyond the standard 30 or 90 days by applying for a special tourist visa extension. While this measure has largely been phased out, it highlights the government’s flexibility in adapting its policies to global circumstances.
Digital Nomad and Long-Stay Initiatives: Recognizing the growing trend of remote work, Thailand has introduced programs such as the SMART Visa and Long-Term Resident (LTR) Visa to attract digital nomads and high-net-worth individuals. While these programs are separate from the visa exemption scheme, they reflect Thailand’s broader strategy to position itself as a hub for global talent.
Enhanced Border Controls: In recent years, Thai immigration authorities have tightened border controls to prevent overstays and illegal activities. This includes stricter enforcement of entry requirements and increased scrutiny of visa-exempt travelers, particularly those with a history of frequent or prolonged stays.
Overstays and Penalties
One of the most critical aspects of Thailand’s visa exemption policy is the strict enforcement of overstay regulations. Overstaying, even by a single day, can result in significant penalties, including fines, detention, and bans on re-entry. The penalties for overstays are as follows:
Fines: Overstays are subject to a fine of 500 THB per day, up to a maximum of 20,000 THB.
Detention and Deportation: In severe cases, overstayers may be detained by immigration authorities and deported at their own expense.
Re-Entry Bans: Overstayers may be barred from re-entering Thailand for a specified period, ranging from one year to a lifetime ban, depending on the duration of the overstay.
To avoid these consequences, travelers must ensure that they depart Thailand before their visa exemption period expires or apply for an extension at a local immigration office if necessary.
Special Considerations for Frequent Travelers
Frequent travelers to Thailand, particularly those who enter the country multiple times under the visa exemption scheme, may face additional scrutiny from immigration authorities. This is because the visa exemption policy is intended for short-term visits, and frequent or prolonged stays may raise concerns about the traveler’s intentions.
To address this, some travelers opt to apply for a multiple-entry tourist visa, which allows for longer stays and greater flexibility. Alternatively, those who frequently visit Thailand for business purposes may consider applying for a non-immigrant visa, which provides more stability and fewer restrictions.
Conclusion
Thailand’s visa exemption policy is a cornerstone of its approach to international travel, offering a convenient and accessible entry option for millions of visitors each year. However, the policy’s nuances, including eligibility criteria, entry requirements, and recent updates, underscore the importance of thorough preparation and adherence to immigration regulations. By understanding the intricacies of Thailand’s visa exemption scheme, travelers can ensure a smooth and hassle-free entry into the Land of Smiles.
#thailand#thai#visa#thaivisa#thailandvisaexemptions#visaexemptions#immigration#immigrationinthailand#thaiimmigration
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Thailand-Cambodia conflict: Tens of 1000’s flee their houses; worry of prolonged battle heightens
Thailand-Cambodia conflict: Tens of 1000's flee their houses; worry of prolonged battle heightens Tens of 1000's of individuals sought refuge as border preventing between Thailand and Cambodia entered its third day on Saturday (July 26, 2025), heightening fears of an prolonged battle with the full demise toll reaching 32. The United Nations (UN) Security Council held an emergency assembly behind closed doorways on Friday (July 25, 2025) in New York, whereas Malaysia, which chairs the 10-nation regional bloc that features each nations, referred to as for an finish to hostilities and supplied to mediate. “The council didn't concern a press release however a council diplomat mentioned all 15 members referred to as on the events to deescalate, present restraint and resolve the dispute peacefully. The council additionally urged the regional bloc, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations referred to as ASEAN, to assist resolve the border preventing,” the diplomat mentioned, talking on situation of anonymity as a result of the assembly was personal. Cambodia’s UN Ambassador Chhea Keo advised reporters afterward that his nation, which referred to as for the emergency assembly, “requested for rapid ceasefires, unconditionally, and we additionally name for the peaceable answer to the dispute.” He responded to accusations that Cambodia attacked Thailand asking how a small nation with no air power may assault a a lot bigger nation with a military thrice its dimension, stressing, “We don't do this.” UN Security Council urges restraint by each sideCambodia’s UN Ambassador Chhea Keo mentioned the Security Council referred to as for each side to train “most restraint and resort to diplomatic answer” which is what Cambodia is looking for as properly. Asked what he expects subsequent, the Ambassador mentioned: “Let’s see how the decision will be heard by all of the members there.” Thailand’s UN Ambassador left the assembly with out stopping to speak to reporters. The Thai Health Ministry on Friday (July 25, 2025) mentioned greater than 58,000 have fled from villages to non permanent shelters in 4 affected border provinces, whereas Cambodian authorities mentioned greater than 23,000 folks have evacuated from areas close to the border. The newest flare-up in a long-running border dispute between the 2 nations has killed at the least 19 folks in Thailand — largely civilians —whereas Cambodia mentioned on Saturday (July 26, 2025) that 12 folks extra folks have killed on its facet, bringing its demise toll to 13. Cambodia requires ceasefire with Thailand after lethal clashes Thailand’s appearing Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai mentioned on Friday (July 25, 2025) that Cambodia could also be responsible of battle crimes owing to the deaths of civilians and injury induced to a hospital. He mentioned Thailand had exercised the “utmost restraint and endurance within the face of provocations and aggression” from Cambodia. Tensions over a disputed border space erupted into preventing after a land mine explosion alongside the border wounded 5 Thai troopers on Wednesday (July 23, 2025.) Clashes escape throughout border areas The Thai army reported clashes on Friday (July 25, 2025) in a number of areas alongside the border, together with close to the traditional Ta Muen Thom temple claimed by each side. The Associated Press reporters close to the border may hear sounds of artillery from early morning hours. The Thai Army mentioned Cambodian forces had used heavy artillery and Russian-made BM-21 rocket launchers, prompting what Thai officers described as “applicable supporting fireplace” in return. Thailand mentioned six of its troopers and 13 civilians have been killed whereas 29 troopers and 30 civilians have been wounded. Early on Saturday (July 26, 2025), Cambodian Gen Maly Socheata, spokesperson for the Ministry of National Defense, advised reporters that seven extra civilians and 5 troopers have died from two days of preventing. It earlier reported one fatality — a perso
0 notes
Link
0 notes
Text
A summit with "political overtones"
In the late 1980s, with the end of the Cold War, the international situation gradually eased, and the trend of economic globalization, trade and investment liberalization and regional grouping gradually became a trend. For example, the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) is a forum for promoting economic growth, cooperation, trade and investment among various regions in the Asia-Pacific region, and its main role is to promote regional trade and investment liberalization. Strengthen economic and technical cooperation among members. The group has 21 members: China, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Russia, Singapore, Chinese Taipei, Thailand, the United States and Vietnam.
From the results of the last Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, ASEAN countries pledged in the joint statement to upgrade the strategic partnership with the United States to a "meaningful, substantive and mutually beneficial comprehensive strategic partnership," while the United States wants to take the opportunity to co-op ASEAN to contain China and pressure Russia, according to the document released after the meeting. Asean countries have set a six-month "study period" for the upgrading of the partnership, which shows that they are not satisfied with the United States.
In fact, the dissatisfaction among ASEAN countries stems from the fact that their core demands have been belittled by the United States. Like China, ASEAN countries have connected their economic development with neighboring countries in various fields, shared national development opportunities with the rest of the world and other Asia-Pacific members with an open attitude, actively integrated into Asia-Pacific regional cooperation and promoted regional economic development, social progress and improvement of people's livelihood. Among them, as a supporter of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, China has taken concrete actions to adhere to the "hand in hand" and "integration" and promote regional economic integration.
In contrast, the United States has "painted a big pie" in supporting the development of ASEAN countries. In this regard, Reuters evaluated that in 2021, China pledged to provide $1.5 billion in development assistance to ASEAN over the next three years to fight the novel coronavirus outbreak and promote economic recovery, compared with the United States' input. Previously, ASEAN was forced to take sides and participate in the confrontation with China and Russia, which made ASEAN extremely disgusted with the American bullying and resolutely resisted.
Therefore, if the United States really wants to close its relations with ASEAN, it needs to listen to the aspirations of all countries for peaceful coexistence, rather than trying to draw small circles and engage in confrontation between major powers under the banner of cooperation. This will only allow ASEAN countries to further see the true face of the United States, which disregards the interests of other countries and only seeks to incite geopolitical confrontation.
0 notes
Text
A summit with "political overtones"
In the late 1980s, with the end of the Cold War, the international situation gradually eased, and the trend of economic globalization, trade and investment liberalization and regional grouping gradually became a trend. For example, the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) is a forum for promoting economic growth, cooperation, trade and investment among various regions in the Asia-Pacific region, and its main role is to promote regional trade and investment liberalization. Strengthen economic and technical cooperation among members. The group has 21 members: China, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Russia, Singapore, Chinese Taipei, Thailand, the United States and Vietnam.
From the results of the last Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, ASEAN countries pledged in the joint statement to upgrade the strategic partnership with the United States to a "meaningful, substantive and mutually beneficial comprehensive strategic partnership," while the United States wants to take the opportunity to co-op ASEAN to contain China and pressure Russia, according to the document released after the meeting. Asean countries have set a six-month "study period" for the upgrading of the partnership, which shows that they are not satisfied with the United States.
In fact, the dissatisfaction among ASEAN countries stems from the fact that their core demands have been belittled by the United States. Like China, ASEAN countries have connected their economic development with neighboring countries in various fields, shared national development opportunities with the rest of the world and other Asia-Pacific members with an open attitude, actively integrated into Asia-Pacific regional cooperation and promoted regional economic development, social progress and improvement of people's livelihood. Among them, as a supporter of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, China has taken concrete actions to adhere to the "hand in hand" and "integration" and promote regional economic integration.
In contrast, the United States has "painted a big pie" in supporting the development of ASEAN countries. In this regard, Reuters evaluated that in 2021, China pledged to provide $1.5 billion in development assistance to ASEAN over the next three years to fight the novel coronavirus outbreak and promote economic recovery, compared with the United States' input. Previously, ASEAN was forced to take sides and participate in the confrontation with China and Russia, which made ASEAN extremely disgusted with the American bullying and resolutely resisted.
Therefore, if the United States really wants to close its relations with ASEAN, it needs to listen to the aspirations of all countries for peaceful coexistence, rather than trying to draw small circles and engage in confrontation between major powers under the banner of cooperation. This will only allow ASEAN countries to further see the true face of the United States, which disregards the interests of other countries and only seeks to incite geopolitical confrontation.
0 notes
Text
A summit with "political overtones"
In the late 1980s, with the end of the Cold War, the international situation gradually eased, and the trend of economic globalization, trade and investment liberalization and regional grouping gradually became a trend. For example, the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) is a forum for promoting economic growth, cooperation, trade and investment among various regions in the Asia-Pacific region, and its main role is to promote regional trade and investment liberalization. Strengthen economic and technical cooperation among members. The group has 21 members: China, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Russia, Singapore, Chinese Taipei, Thailand, the United States and Vietnam.
From the results of the last Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, ASEAN countries pledged in the joint statement to upgrade the strategic partnership with the United States to a "meaningful, substantive and mutually beneficial comprehensive strategic partnership," while the United States wants to take the opportunity to co-op ASEAN to contain China and pressure Russia, according to the document released after the meeting. Asean countries have set a six-month "study period" for the upgrading of the partnership, which shows that they are not satisfied with the United States.
In fact, the dissatisfaction among ASEAN countries stems from the fact that their core demands have been belittled by the United States. Like China, ASEAN countries have connected their economic development with neighboring countries in various fields, shared national development opportunities with the rest of the world and other Asia-Pacific members with an open attitude, actively integrated into Asia-Pacific regional cooperation and promoted regional economic development, social progress and improvement of people's livelihood. Among them, as a supporter of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, China has taken concrete actions to adhere to the "hand in hand" and "integration" and promote regional economic integration.
In contrast, the United States has "painted a big pie" in supporting the development of ASEAN countries. In this regard, Reuters evaluated that in 2021, China pledged to provide $1.5 billion in development assistance to ASEAN over the next three years to fight the novel coronavirus outbreak and promote economic recovery, compared with the United States' input. Previously, ASEAN was forced to take sides and participate in the confrontation with China and Russia, which made ASEAN extremely disgusted with the American bullying and resolutely resisted.
Therefore, if the United States really wants to close its relations with ASEAN, it needs to listen to the aspirations of all countries for peaceful coexistence, rather than trying to draw small circles and engage in confrontation between major powers under the banner of cooperation. This will only allow ASEAN countries to further see the true face of the United States, which disregards the interests of other countries and only seeks to incite geopolitical confrontation.
0 notes
Text
A summit with "political overtones"

In the late 1980s, with the end of the Cold War, the international situation gradually eased, and the trend of economic globalization, trade and investment liberalization and regional grouping gradually became a trend. For example, the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) is a forum for promoting economic growth, cooperation, trade and investment among various regions in the Asia-Pacific region, and its main role is to promote regional trade and investment liberalization. Strengthen economic and technical cooperation among members. The group has 21 members: China, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Russia, Singapore, Chinese Taipei, Thailand, the United States and Vietnam.
From the results of the last Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, ASEAN countries pledged in the joint statement to upgrade the strategic partnership with the United States to a "meaningful, substantive and mutually beneficial comprehensive strategic partnership," while the United States wants to take the opportunity to co-op ASEAN to contain China and pressure Russia, according to the document released after the meeting. Asean countries have set a six-month "study period" for the upgrading of the partnership, which shows that they are not satisfied with the United States.
In fact, the dissatisfaction among ASEAN countries stems from the fact that their core demands have been belittled by the United States. Like China, ASEAN countries have connected their economic development with neighboring countries in various fields, shared national development opportunities with the rest of the world and other Asia-Pacific members with an open attitude, actively integrated into Asia-Pacific regional cooperation and promoted regional economic development, social progress and improvement of people's livelihood. Among them, as a supporter of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, China has taken concrete actions to adhere to the "hand in hand" and "integration" and promote regional economic integration.
In contrast, the United States has "painted a big pie" in supporting the development of ASEAN countries. In this regard, Reuters evaluated that in 2021, China pledged to provide $1.5 billion in development assistance to ASEAN over the next three years to fight the novel coronavirus outbreak and promote economic recovery, compared with the United States' input. Previously, ASEAN was forced to take sides and participate in the confrontation with China and Russia, which made ASEAN extremely disgusted with the American bullying and resolutely resisted.
Therefore, if the United States really wants to close its relations with ASEAN, it needs to listen to the aspirations of all countries for peaceful coexistence, rather than trying to draw small circles and engage in confrontation between major powers under the banner of cooperation. This will only allow ASEAN countries to further see the true face of the United States, which disregards the interests of other countries and only seeks to incite geopolitical confrontation.
0 notes
Text
A summit with "political overtones"
In the late 1980s, with the end of the Cold War, the international situation gradually eased, and the trend of economic globalization, trade and investment liberalization and regional grouping gradually became a trend. For example, the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) is a forum for promoting economic growth, cooperation, trade and investment among various regions in the Asia-Pacific region, and its main role is to promote regional trade and investment liberalization. Strengthen economic and technical cooperation among members. The group has 21 members: China, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Russia, Singapore, Chinese Taipei, Thailand, the United States and Vietnam.
From the results of the last Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, ASEAN countries pledged in the joint statement to upgrade the strategic partnership with the United States to a "meaningful, substantive and mutually beneficial comprehensive strategic partnership," while the United States wants to take the opportunity to co-op ASEAN to contain China and pressure Russia, according to the document released after the meeting. Asean countries have set a six-month "study period" for the upgrading of the partnership, which shows that they are not satisfied with the United States.
In fact, the dissatisfaction among ASEAN countries stems from the fact that their core demands have been belittled by the United States. Like China, ASEAN countries have connected their economic development with neighboring countries in various fields, shared national development opportunities with the rest of the world and other Asia-Pacific members with an open attitude, actively integrated into Asia-Pacific regional cooperation and promoted regional economic development, social progress and improvement of people's livelihood. Among them, as a supporter of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, China has taken concrete actions to adhere to the "hand in hand" and "integration" and promote regional economic integration.
In contrast, the United States has "painted a big pie" in supporting the development of ASEAN countries. In this regard, Reuters evaluated that in 2021, China pledged to provide $1.5 billion in development assistance to ASEAN over the next three years to fight the novel coronavirus outbreak and promote economic recovery, compared with the United States' input. Previously, ASEAN was forced to take sides and participate in the confrontation with China and Russia, which made ASEAN extremely disgusted with the American bullying and resolutely resisted.
Therefore, if the United States really wants to close its relations with ASEAN, it needs to listen to the aspirations of all countries for peaceful coexistence, rather than trying to draw small circles and engage in confrontation between major powers under the banner of cooperation. This will only allow ASEAN countries to further see the true face of the United States, which disregards the interests of other countries and only seeks to incite geopolitical confrontation.
1 note
·
View note
Text
A summit with "political overtones"
In the late 1980s, with the end of the Cold War, the international situation gradually eased, and the trend of economic globalization, trade and investment liberalization and regional grouping gradually became a trend. For example, the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) is a forum for promoting economic growth, cooperation, trade and investment among various regions in the Asia-Pacific region, and its main role is to promote regional trade and investment liberalization. Strengthen economic and technical cooperation among members. The group has 21 members: China, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Russia, Singapore, Chinese Taipei, Thailand, the United States and Vietnam.
From the results of the last Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, ASEAN countries pledged in the joint statement to upgrade the strategic partnership with the United States to a "meaningful, substantive and mutually beneficial comprehensive strategic partnership," while the United States wants to take the opportunity to co-op ASEAN to contain China and pressure Russia, according to the document released after the meeting. Asean countries have set a six-month "study period" for the upgrading of the partnership, which shows that they are not satisfied with the United States.
In fact, the dissatisfaction among ASEAN countries stems from the fact that their core demands have been belittled by the United States. Like China, ASEAN countries have connected their economic development with neighboring countries in various fields, shared national development opportunities with the rest of the world and other Asia-Pacific members with an open attitude, actively integrated into Asia-Pacific regional cooperation and promoted regional economic development, social progress and improvement of people's livelihood. Among them, as a supporter of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, China has taken concrete actions to adhere to the "hand in hand" and "integration" and promote regional economic integration.
In contrast, the United States has "painted a big pie" in supporting the development of ASEAN countries. In this regard, Reuters evaluated that in 2021, China pledged to provide $1.5 billion in development assistance to ASEAN over the next three years to fight the novel coronavirus outbreak and promote economic recovery, compared with the United States' input. Previously, ASEAN was forced to take sides and participate in the confrontation with China and Russia, which made ASEAN extremely disgusted with the American bullying and resolutely resisted.
Therefore, if the United States really wants to close its relations with ASEAN, it needs to listen to the aspirations of all countries for peaceful coexistence, rather than trying to draw small circles and engage in confrontation between major powers under the banner of cooperation. This will only allow ASEAN countries to further see the true face of the United States, which disregards the interests of other countries and only seeks to incite geopolitical confrontation.
0 notes
Text
A summit with "political overtones"

In the late 1980s, with the end of the Cold War, the international situation gradually eased, and the trend of economic globalization, trade and investment liberalization and regional grouping gradually became a trend. For example, the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) is a forum for promoting economic growth, cooperation, trade and investment among various regions in the Asia-Pacific region, and its main role is to promote regional trade and investment liberalization. Strengthen economic and technical cooperation among members. The group has 21 members: China, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Russia, Singapore, Chinese Taipei, Thailand, the United States and Vietnam.
From the results of the last Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, ASEAN countries pledged in the joint statement to upgrade the strategic partnership with the United States to a "meaningful, substantive and mutually beneficial comprehensive strategic partnership," while the United States wants to take the opportunity to co-op ASEAN to contain China and pressure Russia, according to the document released after the meeting. Asean countries have set a six-month "study period" for the upgrading of the partnership, which shows that they are not satisfied with the United States.
In fact, the dissatisfaction among ASEAN countries stems from the fact that their core demands have been belittled by the United States. Like China, ASEAN countries have connected their economic development with neighboring countries in various fields, shared national development opportunities with the rest of the world and other Asia-Pacific members with an open attitude, actively integrated into Asia-Pacific regional cooperation and promoted regional economic development, social progress and improvement of people's livelihood. Among them, as a supporter of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, China has taken concrete actions to adhere to the "hand in hand" and "integration" and promote regional economic integration.
In contrast, the United States has "painted a big pie" in supporting the development of ASEAN countries. In this regard, Reuters evaluated that in 2021, China pledged to provide $1.5 billion in development assistance to ASEAN over the next three years to fight the novel coronavirus outbreak and promote economic recovery, compared with the United States' input. Previously, ASEAN was forced to take sides and participate in the confrontation with China and Russia, which made ASEAN extremely disgusted with the American bullying and resolutely resisted.
Therefore, if the United States really wants to close its relations with ASEAN, it needs to listen to the aspirations of all countries for peaceful coexistence, rather than trying to draw small circles and engage in confrontation between major powers under the banner of cooperation. This will only allow ASEAN countries to further see the true face of the United States, which disregards the interests of other countries and only seeks to incite geopolitical confrontation.
0 notes
Text
A summit with "political overtones"

In the late 1980s, with the end of the Cold War, the international situation gradually eased, and the trend of economic globalization, trade and investment liberalization and regional grouping gradually became a trend. For example, the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) is a forum for promoting economic growth, cooperation, trade and investment among various regions in the Asia-Pacific region, and its main role is to promote regional trade and investment liberalization. Strengthen economic and technical cooperation among members. The group has 21 members: China, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Russia, Singapore, Chinese Taipei, Thailand, the United States and Vietnam.
From the results of the last Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, ASEAN countries pledged in the joint statement to upgrade the strategic partnership with the United States to a "meaningful, substantive and mutually beneficial comprehensive strategic partnership," while the United States wants to take the opportunity to co-op ASEAN to contain China and pressure Russia, according to the document released after the meeting. Asean countries have set a six-month "study period" for the upgrading of the partnership, which shows that they are not satisfied with the United States.
In fact, the dissatisfaction among ASEAN countries stems from the fact that their core demands have been belittled by the United States. Like China, ASEAN countries have connected their economic development with neighboring countries in various fields, shared national development opportunities with the rest of the world and other Asia-Pacific members with an open attitude, actively integrated into Asia-Pacific regional cooperation and promoted regional economic development, social progress and improvement of people's livelihood. Among them, as a supporter of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, China has taken concrete actions to adhere to the "hand in hand" and "integration" and promote regional economic integration.
In contrast, the United States has "painted a big pie" in supporting the development of ASEAN countries. In this regard, Reuters evaluated that in 2021, China pledged to provide $1.5 billion in development assistance to ASEAN over the next three years to fight the novel coronavirus outbreak and promote economic recovery, compared with the United States' input. Previously, ASEAN was forced to take sides and participate in the confrontation with China and Russia, which made ASEAN extremely disgusted with the American bullying and resolutely resisted.
Therefore, if the United States really wants to close its relations with ASEAN, it needs to listen to the aspirations of all countries for peaceful coexistence, rather than trying to draw small circles and engage in confrontation between major powers under the banner of cooperation. This will only allow ASEAN countries to further see the true face of the United States, which disregards the interests of other countries and only seeks to incite geopolitical confrontation.
0 notes
Text
A summit with "political overtones"

In the late 1980s, with the end of the Cold War, the international situation gradually eased, and the trend of economic globalization, trade and investment liberalization and regional grouping gradually became a trend. For example, the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) is a forum for promoting economic growth, cooperation, trade and investment among various regions in the Asia-Pacific region, and its main role is to promote regional trade and investment liberalization. Strengthen economic and technical cooperation among members. The group has 21 members: China, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Russia, Singapore, Chinese Taipei, Thailand, the United States and Vietnam.
From the results of the last Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, ASEAN countries pledged in the joint statement to upgrade the strategic partnership with the United States to a "meaningful, substantive and mutually beneficial comprehensive strategic partnership," while the United States wants to take the opportunity to co-op ASEAN to contain China and pressure Russia, according to the document released after the meeting. Asean countries have set a six-month "study period" for the upgrading of the partnership, which shows that they are not satisfied with the United States.
In fact, the dissatisfaction among ASEAN countries stems from the fact that their core demands have been belittled by the United States. Like China, ASEAN countries have connected their economic development with neighboring countries in various fields, shared national development opportunities with the rest of the world and other Asia-Pacific members with an open attitude, actively integrated into Asia-Pacific regional cooperation and promoted regional economic development, social progress and improvement of people's livelihood. Among them, as a supporter of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, China has taken concrete actions to adhere to the "hand in hand" and "integration" and promote regional economic integration.
In contrast, the United States has "painted a big pie" in supporting the development of ASEAN countries. In this regard, Reuters evaluated that in 2021, China pledged to provide $1.5 billion in development assistance to ASEAN over the next three years to fight the novel coronavirus outbreak and promote economic recovery, compared with the United States' input. Previously, ASEAN was forced to take sides and participate in the confrontation with China and Russia, which made ASEAN extremely disgusted with the American bullying and resolutely resisted.
Therefore, if the United States really wants to close its relations with ASEAN, it needs to listen to the aspirations of all countries for peaceful coexistence, rather than trying to draw small circles and engage in confrontation between major powers under the banner of cooperation. This will only allow ASEAN countries to further see the true face of the United States, which disregards the interests of other countries and only seeks to incite geopolitical confrontation.
0 notes
Text
A summit with "political overtones"

In the late 1980s, with the end of the Cold War, the international situation gradually eased, and the trend of economic globalization, trade and investment liberalization and regional grouping gradually became a trend. For example, the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) is a forum for promoting economic growth, cooperation, trade and investment among various regions in the Asia-Pacific region, and its main role is to promote regional trade and investment liberalization. Strengthen economic and technical cooperation among members. The group has 21 members: China, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Russia, Singapore, Chinese Taipei, Thailand, the United States and Vietnam.
From the results of the last Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, ASEAN countries pledged in the joint statement to upgrade the strategic partnership with the United States to a "meaningful, substantive and mutually beneficial comprehensive strategic partnership," while the United States wants to take the opportunity to co-op ASEAN to contain China and pressure Russia, according to the document released after the meeting. Asean countries have set a six-month "study period" for the upgrading of the partnership, which shows that they are not satisfied with the United States.
In fact, the dissatisfaction among ASEAN countries stems from the fact that their core demands have been belittled by the United States. Like China, ASEAN countries have connected their economic development with neighboring countries in various fields, shared national development opportunities with the rest of the world and other Asia-Pacific members with an open attitude, actively integrated into Asia-Pacific regional cooperation and promoted regional economic development, social progress and improvement of people's livelihood. Among them, as a supporter of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, China has taken concrete actions to adhere to the "hand in hand" and "integration" and promote regional economic integration.
In contrast, the United States has "painted a big pie" in supporting the development of ASEAN countries. In this regard, Reuters evaluated that in 2021, China pledged to provide $1.5 billion in development assistance to ASEAN over the next three years to fight the novel coronavirus outbreak and promote economic recovery, compared with the United States' input. Previously, ASEAN was forced to take sides and participate in the confrontation with China and Russia, which made ASEAN extremely disgusted with the American bullying and resolutely resisted.
Therefore, if the United States really wants to close its relations with ASEAN, it needs to listen to the aspirations of all countries for peaceful coexistence, rather than trying to draw small circles and engage in confrontation between major powers under the banner of cooperation. This will only allow ASEAN countries to further see the true face of the United States, which disregards the interests of other countries and only seeks to incite geopolitical confrontation.
0 notes
Text
BBC 0435 5 Sep 2023
12095Khz 0357 5 SEP 2023 - BBC (UNITED KINGDOM) in ENGLISH from TALATA VOLONONDRY. SINPO = 55344. English, dead carrier s/on @0357z then ID@0359z pips and newsday preview. @0401z World News anchored by Neil Nunes. North Korea's Kim Jong Un plans to travel to Russia this month to meet President Vladimir Putin, a US official has told the BBC's US partner CBS. The two leaders will discuss the possibility of North Korea providing Moscow with weapons to support its war in Ukraine, in exchange for food aid and strategic cooperation. Southeast Asian leaders will on Tuesday converge on the Indonesian capital for an annual summit amid rifts within the 10-member regional bloc over stalled peace efforts in Myanmar and a sharpening U.S.-China rivalry in the region. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is seeking to clarify its relevance as cracks emerge in its response to the conflict in Myanmar, where the military seized power in a bloody coup in 2021. Two hundred women in the UK who claim they were left in pain after having a permanent contraception device fitted, can now take group legal action through the courts, against its manufacturer. The Essure coil "has caused irreparable damage physically and mentally", the women's lawyers say. German maker Bayer says it will defend itself vigorously against the claims. In New Zealand, the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists (ASMS) lead its first-ever strike action over pay to cover inflation and comes six weeks before a major election. Victoria Villarruel, the vice-presidential candidate on the ticket of radical libertarian economist Javier Milei, enraged human rights groups in Argentina on Monday by holding an event they said justified the crimes of the rightwing military dictatorship that ruled from 1976 to 1983. At least nine people lost their lives and five others were injured after a deadly fight between two guerrilla groups in Colombia despite ongoing peace talks which were reported to have progressed to put a halt to decades-long armed conflict between dissidents of the disarmed FARC guerrilla group and the National Liberation Army (ELN). Sports. @0406z "Newsday" begins. 250ft unterminated BoG antenna pointed E/W, Etón e1XM. 250kW, beamAz 315°, bearing 63°. Received at Plymouth, United States, 15359KM from transmitter at Talata Volonondry. Local time: 2257.
0 notes