#artificial intelligence limitations

[gwmac]

Does 'Common Sense' Actually Exist?

The Conversation That Started It All A few nights ago, I found myself on the phone with a good friend discussing something entirely unrelated when he casually dropped the phrase, “Well, it’s just common sense.” That simple remark derailed our entire conversation for the next 30 minutes. I asked him to define what he meant by “common sense.” He couldn’t. Not really. He gave some vague examples,…

[swash0067]

Lisl, experiment in B&W with limited color

[forensicfield]

Artificial Intelligence Technology and Forensic Science

Artificial Intelligence Technology and Forensic Science collaborate to revolutionize crime investigation and evidence analysis, enhancing accuracy and efficiency. #forensicscience #forensicfield #artificialintelligence and forensicscience #crimescene

Continue reading Artificial Intelligence Technology and Forensic Science

[zentarablog]

10 Common Myths About Artificial Intelligence Debunked

Artificial Intelligence is rapidly becoming one of the most transformative technologies of our time. It powers the recommendation engines that suggest what we should watch, helps doctors diagnose diseases, and even pilots cars. Yet, for all its growing ubiquity, AI remains widely misunderstood. The public discourse is rife with sensationalism, oscillating between utopian promises of a work-free…

[zomb13s]

Appendix Automatica: De Cognitionis Gradus et Intercommunicatio Inter IQ Coefficientes: (Automatic Appendix: Degrees of Cognition and Intercommunication Among IQ Coefficients)

1. Introduction The Intelligence Quotient (IQ) scale is widely used as a metric to assess cognitive abilities across populations. While IQ is not a comprehensive measure of intelligence, it provides a useful framework for analyzing intergroup communication and understanding. This appendix mathematically segments the full range of measured IQ scores into five distinct groups and models their…

[mysterioushimachal]

Elon Musk’s AI Grok Gets a Himalayan Test – How Accurate Was It on Himachal & Uttarakhand?

[mfi-miami]

Elderly Romspen Investors Forced To Eat Cat Food

Elderly Romspen Investors Forced To Eat Cat Food As Romspen Reports Investor Fund Profits Increased 8% Annually Since 2019  Senior citizens who have invested their pension into Romspen are forced to eat cat food to survive thanks to greedy Romspen executives. Elderly Romspen investors are being forced to eat cat food. Why? Rospen hasn’t paid full investor redemptions since December 2019. Yet,…

[questioningzeal]

A Habit to Question

Questioning is something which i feel is very intrinsic to us like we always see children and out going people to have a sense to question everything i belive it tends to give us a reason to act or abstain any further emotion or notion which any situation presents us with cuz otherwise we just do things for the sake of doing like if u would give some substantial proof or logic to any command u will see people more tender and welcoming to it whatever it may be and this habit is in-built in us but mostly due to societal norms we tend to get more receptive and careless to everything that is thrown onto us.

I believe its quite an issue as it hampers us to develop our own reasoning and nature cuz then we are tending to be more like an A.I model which just acts by the prompt and code and is expected to just comply.

Questioning really moulds our character and belief system therefore i hope u are reminded to never get this habit be snatched away.

-CuriousOz(newbie)

[defencecapital]

HAL Management Academy , IIIT Dharwad sign MoU for collaborative research, skill development

By A Correspondent Bengaluru (Karnataka): India’s state-run Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) Management Academy, the nodal training agency of HAL, and the Indian Institute of Information Technology, Dharwad, (IIIT-Dharwad) have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen industry-academia collaboration in advanced technologies. The partnership would focus on joint research,…

[nnctales]

What AI Cannot Do: AI Limitation

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has made remarkable strides in recent years, revolutionizing industries from healthcare to finance. However, despite its impressive capabilities, there are inherent AI limitation to what it can achieve. Understanding these limitations is crucial for effectively integrating AI into our lives and recognizing its role as a tool rather than a replacement for human…

[meelsport]

Exploring the Benefits of AI SEO Tools for Your Website

AI SEO tools are transforming the way we approach search engine optimization. In today’s fast-paced digital world, leveraging AI SEO tools can give your website a significant edge over the competition. These advanced tools use artificial intelligence to enhance various aspects of SEO, making it easier for your content to rank higher on search engine results pages (SERPs). Let’s dive into how AI…

[the-hwaelweg]

Working in publishing, my inbox is basically just:

Article on the Horrors of AI

Article on How AI Can Help Your Business

Article on How AI Has Peaked

Article on How AI Is Here to Stay Forever

Article on How AI Is a Silicon Valley Scam That Doesn't Live Up to the Promise and In Fact Can't Because They've Literally Run Out of Written Words to Train LLMs On

[askgaloredigital]

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been a topic of fascination and debate for decades. As technology progresses, the question on many minds is whether AI will eventually replace human intelligence. This blog will explore the capabilities and limitations of AI, its impact on various industries, and how it interacts with human intelligence.

For more information visit: https://askgalore.com/will-artificial-intelligence-replace-human

[ohnoitstbskyen]

You’ve probably been asked this before, but do you have a specific view on ai-generated art. I’m doing a school project on artificial intelligence and if it’s okay, i would like to cite you

I mean, you're welcome to cite me if you like. I recently wrote a post under a reblog about AI, and I did a video about it a while back, before the full scale of AI hype had really started rolling over the Internet - I don't 100% agree with all my arguments from that video anymore, but you can cite it if you please.

In short, I think generative AI art

Is art, real art, and it's silly to argue otherwise, the question is what KIND of art it is and what that art DOES in the world. Generally, it is boring and bland art which makes the world a more stressful, unpleasant and miserable place to be.

AI generated art is structurally and inherently limited by its nature. It is by necessity averages generated from data-sets, and so it inherits EVERY bias of its training data and EVERY bias of its training data validators and creators. It naturally tends towards the lowest common denominator in all areas, and it is structurally biased towards reinforcing and reaffirming the status quo of everything it is turned to.

It tends to be all surface, no substance. As in, it carries the superficial aesthetic of very high-quality rendering, but only insofar as it reproduces whatever signifiers of "quality" are most prized in its weighted training data. It cannot understand the structures and principles of what it is creating. Ask it for a horse and it does not know what a "horse" is, all it knows is what parts of it training data are tagged as "horse" and which general data patterns are likely to lead an observer to identify its output also as "horse." People sometimes describe this limitation as "a lack of soul" but it's perhaps more useful to think of it as a lack of comprehension.

Due to this lack of comprehension, AI art cannot communicate anything - or rather, the output tends to attempt to communicate everything, at random, all at once, and it's the visual equivalent of a kind of white noise. It lacks focus.

Human operators of AI generative tools can imbue communicative meaning into the outputs, and whip the models towards some sort of focus, because humans can do that with literally anything they turn their directed attention towards. Human beings can make art with paint spatters and bits of gum stuck under tennis shoes, of course a dedicated human putting tons of time into a process of trial and error can produce something meaningful with genAI tools.

The nature of genAI as a tool of creation is uniquely limited and uniquely constrained, a genAI tool can only ever output some mixture of whatever is in its training data (and what's in its training data is biased by the data that its creators valued enough to include), and it can only ever output that mixture according to the weights and biases of its programming and data set, which is fully within the control of whoever created the tool in the first place. Consequently, genAI is a tool whose full creative capacity is always, always, always going to be owned by corporations, the only entities with the resources and capacity to produce the most powerful models. And those models, thus, will always only create according to corporate interest. An individual human can use a pencil to draw whatever the hell they want, but an individual human can never use Midjourney to create anything except that which Midjourney allows them to create. GenAI art is thus limited not only by its mathematical tendency to bias the lowest common denominator, but also by an ideological bias inherited from whoever holds the leash on its creation. The necessary decision of which data gets included in a training set vs which data gets left out will, always and forever, impose de facto censorship on what a model is capable of expressing, and the power to make that decision is never in the hands of the artist attempting to use the tool.

tl;dr genAI art has a tendency to produce ideologically limited and intrinsically censored outputs, while defaulting to lowest common denominators that reproduce and reinforce status quos.

... on top of which its promulgation is an explicit plot by oligarchic industry to drive millions of people deeper into poverty and collapse wages in order to further concentrate wealth in the hands of the 0.01%. But that's just a bonus reason to dislike it.