Tumgik
debunkingsyscourse · 5 months
Text
Thank you for the correction; I was misinformed on that one!!
Claim: Endogenic systems steal medical language.
Validity: Dubious.
Sources of claim: [Post 1][Post 2][Post 3][Post 4]
Discussion: To discuss this claim, we need to examine the history of the endogenic community. Firstly, it must be acknowledged that the endogenic community as it currently exists could not have even existed before 2014, as this is the time when the Lunastus Collective (or, at the time, trashcan-collective) coined the term endogenic to describe any system who did not form from trauma; Lunastus also coined traumagenic for trauma based systems. These terms were coined with intention of replacing current terms, such as Natural Multiple. Therefore, before Lunastus entered the scene, these systems were already using the same terminology as systems with complex dissociative disorders (CDDs) and other traumagenic forms of plurality.
Before that time, the endogenic community was folded into the rest of the system community, and was highly medicalized. This created tension for many systems who did not fit the medical view of plurality, who then went on to form the Natural / Healthy Multiplicity Movement (henceforth shown as NMM). While this movement had its own number of flaws, the topic discussed here is strictly the usage of medical language in endogenic spaces. I would examine the timeline of plural history provided at this link by PluralDeepDive, which contains more sources than I could provide here in a timely manner.
The fact is, the history is muddy, which brings me to the second point. Since endogenic systems were seen as part of the DID community, they didn’t steal anything; endogenic systems are just using the same language they have always used. Furthermore, the community then began to split further by using alternative terms, such as plural or collective, in an effort to shift away from medicalized terminology. If anything, endogenic communities should be credited with attempting to shift further away from medical language.
With other medical terms, the same idea stands. Alter was a term from CDD spaces that endogenic systems kept when the fracture in the community formed, and alternatives were suggested, such as headmates. Splitting has shifted to ‘formed.’ Introject became fictive or factive, or any number of other coined terms*. Every single medical term has a basis in the System community, and endogenic systems have a basis there too -- and despite that, this problem isn't all that major, as endogenic systems have tried shifting their language. Even just the fact that Pluralpedia exists (even with its many flaws) is a sign that endogenic plurals have attempted to shift away from medicalized language.
Conclusion: Based on this, it is my belief that endogenic systems have, by and large, not stolen or appropriated language from CDD systems. While there are individuals from the NMM who purposefully used language from CDD spaces in an attempt to demedicalize the terminology, these systems had already been using this terminology long before that time. The modern endogenic community is simply using the language it’s always used, and is even shifting further and further away from medicalized language as it is.
Notes:
* The terms for fictive and factive came from outside the endogenic community themselves, instead originating from kin spaces. However, my knowledge of this topic is incredibly limited, as as I find kin spaces triggering for my psychosis, I will be avoiding research on this topic. If anyone would like to add their own research, it would be appreciated.
Other Sources to Read:
Pluraldeepdive. (2022, April 30). System. PluralDeepDive. [Link] This source discusses the term ‘system’ and how it’s been used by system communities. It contains sources on the origins of the term, as well as evidence of its usage through the years.
SysmedsareSexist. (2024, May 10). [Link] This is an ask answered by Mod Dude of SysmedsareSexist, a user who has done extensive debunking and research into DID misinformation. This post is about this same topic and offers the perspective of an older system who lived through these shifts in community. While there are no sources provided here, it's valuable to see this perspective.
Lunastusco. (2019). Origin of Endogenic System and Traumagenic System Terminology. Power to the Plurals. [Link] This is a discussion with Lunastusco about the origins of the terms endogenic and traumagenic in context of plurality. They wrote this post for PttP in an effort to explain what these labels mean. This is vital knowledge for understanding the history of endogenic systems.
More may be added as I see fit. Everyone can please feel free to add to this post as needed!
23 notes · View notes
debunkingsyscourse · 5 months
Text
Claim: Endogenic systems steal medical language.
Validity: Dubious.
Sources of claim: [Post 1][Post 2][Post 3][Post 4]
Discussion: To discuss this claim, we need to examine the history of the endogenic community. Firstly, it must be acknowledged that the endogenic community as it currently exists could not have even existed before 2014, as this is the time when the Lunastus Collective (or, at the time, trashcan-collective) coined the term endogenic to describe any system who did not form from trauma; Lunastus also coined traumagenic for trauma based systems. These terms were coined with intention of replacing current terms, such as Natural Multiple. Therefore, before Lunastus entered the scene, these systems were already using the same terminology as systems with complex dissociative disorders (CDDs) and other traumagenic forms of plurality.
Before that time, the endogenic community was folded into the rest of the system community, and was highly medicalized. This created tension for many systems who did not fit the medical view of plurality, who then went on to form the Natural / Healthy Multiplicity Movement (henceforth shown as NMM). While this movement had its own number of flaws, the topic discussed here is strictly the usage of medical language in endogenic spaces. I would examine the timeline of plural history provided at this link by PluralDeepDive, which contains more sources than I could provide here in a timely manner.
The fact is, the history is muddy, which brings me to the second point. Since endogenic systems were seen as part of the DID community, they didn’t steal anything; endogenic systems are just using the same language they have always used. Furthermore, the community then began to split further by using alternative terms, such as plural or collective, in an effort to shift away from medicalized terminology. If anything, endogenic communities should be credited with attempting to shift further away from medical language.
With other medical terms, the same idea stands. Alter was a term from CDD spaces that endogenic systems kept when the fracture in the community formed, and alternatives were suggested, such as headmates. Splitting has shifted to ‘formed.’ Introject became fictive or factive, or any number of other coined terms*. Every single medical term has a basis in the System community, and endogenic systems have a basis there too -- and despite that, this problem isn't all that major, as endogenic systems have tried shifting their language. Even just the fact that Pluralpedia exists (even with its many flaws) is a sign that endogenic plurals have attempted to shift away from medicalized language.
Conclusion: Based on this, it is my belief that endogenic systems have, by and large, not stolen or appropriated language from CDD systems. While there are individuals from the NMM who purposefully used language from CDD spaces in an attempt to demedicalize the terminology, these systems had already been using this terminology long before that time. The modern endogenic community is simply using the language it’s always used, and is even shifting further and further away from medicalized language as it is.
Notes:
* The terms for fictive and factive came from outside the endogenic community themselves, instead originating from kin spaces. However, my knowledge of this topic is incredibly limited, as as I find kin spaces triggering for my psychosis, I will be avoiding research on this topic. If anyone would like to add their own research, it would be appreciated.
Other Sources to Read:
Pluraldeepdive. (2022, April 30). System. PluralDeepDive. [Link] This source discusses the term ‘system’ and how it’s been used by system communities. It contains sources on the origins of the term, as well as evidence of its usage through the years.
SysmedsareSexist. (2024, May 10). [Link] This is an ask answered by Mod Dude of SysmedsareSexist, a user who has done extensive debunking and research into DID misinformation. This post is about this same topic and offers the perspective of an older system who lived through these shifts in community. While there are no sources provided here, it's valuable to see this perspective.
Lunastusco. (2019). Origin of Endogenic System and Traumagenic System Terminology. Power to the Plurals. [Link] This is a discussion with Lunastusco about the origins of the terms endogenic and traumagenic in context of plurality. They wrote this post for PttP in an effort to explain what these labels mean. This is vital knowledge for understanding the history of endogenic systems.
More may be added as I see fit. Everyone can please feel free to add to this post as needed!
23 notes · View notes
debunkingsyscourse · 5 months
Text
For those who are interested in looking at those sources from the Multiplicity Wikipedia page, be sure to be on the correct page! Here’s a link to the specific page.
And here’s the sourced materials on said page, for those who are interested! If a source is listed as unlinked, I didn’t have time to find the link for it myself, so apologies for that. (Update: shoutout to OP for doing the leg work and finding links for the ones without them!!)
I’ve not reviewed these sources for validity, reliability, or bias, but it’s always handy to have sources on hand to fact check claims.
Multiplicity: An Explorative Interview Study on Personal Experiences of People with Multiple Selves (PubMed, Frontiers in Psychology)
Inside TikTok’s booming dissociative identity disorder community (Inverse Article)
Are Multiple Personalities Always a Disorder? (Vice Article)
Exploring the experiences of young people with multiplicity (Youth and Policy Article)
Conceptualizing multiplicity spectrum experiences: A systematic review and thematic synthesis (Wiley Online)
Enacted Identities: Multiplicity, Plurality, and Tulpamancy (Psychology Today Article)
MODES OF EXISTENCE: TOWARDS A PHENOMENOLOGICAL POLYPSYCHISM (Journal of the Society for Existential Analysis)
Rowan, John, ed. (1999). The plural self: multiplicity in everyday life (1. publ ed.). London: Sage Publ. p. 2. ISBN 978-0-7619-6076-8. (Update: link found!)
What we can learn about respect and identity from ‘plurals’ (Aeon Article)
Multiplicity and Identity Mitigation in Video Games (Archived article on a website called “Nightmare mode: The Gamers Trust)
The Best Cartoonist You’ve Never Read Is Eight Different People (Vulture Article)
Dissociative Identity Disorder on TikTok: Why More Teens Are Self-Diagnosing With DID Because of Social Media (Teen Vogue Article)
Exploring the Utility and Personal Relevance of Co-Produced Multiplicity Resources with Young People (PubMed, Journal of Adolescent Trauma)
How they took the Multiple out of Multiplicity – Understanding the history of Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) Terminology (Power to the Plurals)
The Plural Association Nonprofit (Power to the Plurals)
Eriksen, Karen & Kress, Victoria E. (2005). "A Developmental, Constructivist Model for Ethical Assessment (Which Includes Diagnosis, of Course)". Beyond the DSM Story: Ethical Quandaries, Challenges, and Best Practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Page Publications. ISBN 0-7619-3032-9. (Update: link found!)
Stephen E. Braude (1995), First Person Plural: Multiple Personality and the Philosophy of Mind, Rowman & Littlefield, p. 86, ISBN 9780847679966. (Update: link found!)
Carter, Rita (March 2008). Multiplicity: The New Science of Personality, Identity, and the Self. Little, Brown. ISBN 9780316115384. (Update: link found!)
It also lists these resources as further reading:
Ian Hacking (2000). What's Normal?: Narratives of Mental & Emotional Disorders. Kent State University Press. pp. 39–54. ISBN 9780873386531. (Unlinked)
Jennifer Radden (2011). "Multiple Selves". The Oxford Handbook of the Self. Oxford Handbooks Online. pp. 547 et seq. ISBN 9780199548019. (Update: link to abstract and potential access)
And these resources as external links:
Morethanone.info
Plurality Resource
Power to the Plurals
You ever just get in a mood and look at the multiplicity Wikipedia page, only to check if any of the sources are credible. Spoiler alert: they're not.
Literally every website linked was a system or a couple systems "sharing resources" that they've made themselves. That's not credible. They have no credentials to be claimed as a credible source. I really want to check on more of endo sources to see if the source is actually credible or another first hand experience.
20 notes · View notes
debunkingsyscourse · 5 months
Text
Debunking Syscourse!
This blog is dedicated to debunking what we see in syscourse. Every piece of misinformation we happen to see will be addressed, when we have time and energy for it. I plan to provide sources to claims, debunk unsourced claims, and discuss sources others provide.
It isn’t my job, but someone needs to do it, and there aren’t enough of them right now.
About me:
Adult
DID system
BYF:
I don’t use syscourse labels.
I don’t touch transID or pro-ship content if I can avoid it.
This will be updated as more comes up.
1 note · View note