diaryofasugarfiend

[diaryofasugarfiend]

:･ﾟ❤⊹로리언니랑 데이트 했어요 ㅎㅎㅎ:･ﾟ❤⊹

[diaryofasugarfiend]

Ball outfits I've designed for Hook over the years uwu

[diaryofasugarfiend]

Thinking about making a Honeylamb Tarot ! what do u think?

[diaryofasugarfiend]

im inbetween party favor, or Claris

[diaryofasugarfiend]

I am digging through some old files and found these photos that I believe Kuniko Kato shared, some years ago, of the early days of Metamorphose.

[diaryofasugarfiend]

source

[diaryofasugarfiend]

[diaryofasugarfiend]

[diaryofasugarfiend]

[diaryofasugarfiend]

[diaryofasugarfiend]

I'm not exactly sure what the term for this type of "damned if you don't, damned if you do" fallacy, but it's pretty much antisemitism 101. It basically comes down to starting from the conclusion (Jews/Israel are evil) and then giving whatever explanation of the facts you need to make your forgone conclusion look true.

As Arthur Conan Doyle put it, "twisting facts to fit theories rather than theories to fit facts."

(Here's an article about the study referenced in the second to last reblog. https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/124674)

I think circular reasoning is the closest to what you're talking about. Circular reasoning is when the premises are supported by the conclusion and the conclusion is supposed by the premises (technically speaking an example that is like "jews are evil because they do xyz, xyz is evil because jews do it and they're evil so it must be" would be a more classic use of the fallacy but i think this fits too.)

[diaryofasugarfiend]

[diaryofasugarfiend]

NeNe March 1995, Volume 1.

[diaryofasugarfiend]

the eeper

Amboro Silky Anteater, photographed by Ximena Morales Mamani (Source)

[diaryofasugarfiend]

[diaryofasugarfiend]

by 22iiovo ♡

[diaryofasugarfiend]

Purple Snorble

Species: Snorbat