marcoweisman - Tumblr blog

[marcoweisman]

Can Writers Predict the Future?

Earth and the Moon, science fiction author Ule Verne describes a lunar expedition closer to the Apollo 11 mission than readers think he could have predicted in the future. Some have compared his letter to the first human voyage to the moon which took place in 1969 when the United States sent three astronauts for the first time to the moon. He describes how the three-member crew launched their spacecraft from Florida and splashed around in the Pacific before returning to Earth.

Robert Heinlein, one of the greatest science-fiction writers of all time, is the second author on our list to predict his own future in the 1940s. A summary of his predictions can be found here, and it seems he got most of them wrong. In his vision of the future in his major dystopian novel Brave New World in the 1950s, the science-fiction writer George Orwell made some interesting observations about the next 50 years.

He made this prediction in 1964 in New York World Affairs, where he set out his vision for the next 50 years. After his death in 1980, he and several other authors, along with other authors, have predicted the near future in his book Predictions. Gibson would be the first to tell you that he did not predict the future himself.

At its most fundamental level, science fiction draws ideas and experiences from the contemporary cultural and technological environment and extrapolates them into a future event horizon in the minds of the authors. Many science fiction stories are set in the future, which means that they must include future technologies, but also current reasons why things will change or not.

He is part of a growing contingent of science fiction writers hired to envision and predict the future by think tanks, politicians and corporations. The CIO invited prominent science fiction writers such as Larry Niven, Robert Sawyer, Nancy Kress and Charles Stross to share their thoughts on tech-related predictions, including lessons from the business of imagining the near future. From Ramscoop's brain implants to Droud's Romulan warrior cat Kzinti and the orbiting habitat Ringworld, few science fiction writers have given us greater visions than Larry Nivens.

The World Future Society, an association of professional futurists, represents a small but growing group of professionals with decades of experience in thinking about long-term strategies and scenario planning - a method used by organizations to plan for any future. People gamble not to squander the opportunities of the future, but to turn aspects of society upside down. Preparing people to accept that their future is uncertain, and letting them deal with that fact, is not necessarily a bad legacy.

Science fiction writers such as Ule Verne and other well-known science fiction authors such as H. G. Wells and Ray Bradbury have shown an unusual ability to predict the future in their writing. From Jules Verne predicting the Internet to Arthur C. Clarke predicting 3D printing, you have to wonder who predicts what. Those who predict are advocating a wealth of the future to which we all contribute, in the expectation that change will be constant and volatile.

Science fiction encompasses a wide range of technologies that we don't have today, from room-temperature supercomputers to bell disks to shaft-sized, unlocked teleportation units. Science fiction writers are often hired to bring to life scenarios that companies have explored, such as Maughan's contract with Arup, or to come up with ideas they haven't thought of yet. Among my friends, I said a few months ago, it has become a running gag when discussions turn to scientific fiction that resonates in our everyday world.

Gibson doesn't believe the technology he stitched together for the book will prove predictable. Arthur describes in detail what he thinks the future will look like: people will be able to connect, know their locations and do business anywhere in the world. In the afterword of his book Data Privacy and Copyright: The changing landscape of Data, Privacy and Copyright, and What That Means for Writers and Other Creative Types, the author tries to guess what the future holds.

H. G. Wells (s) was considered by many as one of the greatest science fiction writers of all time – writes about lasers, wireless communications, automatic doors and other gadgets that did not even exist at the time of writing. In the early years of the twentieth century, Wells managed to film many ground-breaking novels that seem to define half of the great science fiction concepts that have since been made into movies. The books that turned out to be the most predictable were the works of writers who did what writers do best: investigate and deconstruct culture.

Kress is author of 25 books, including 16 science fiction and fantasy novels, two thrillers, four collections of short stories and three writing books. This selection presents factual information about space travel as well as poems that suggest what it would be like for humans to travel through space. Famous science fiction writers whose stories occupy fictional airplane seats are among the best-known names taking part in the experience: Margaret Atwood, author of The Handmaidens Tale, an acclaimed series on Hulu; Charles Yu, author of HBO's Westworld; and a host of other writers, some of whom have won prestigious Hugo Awards.

[marcoweisman]

Why Humans Value Animals More Than Their Fellow Humans?

There are many reasons why humans value animals more than their fellow humans.

First of all, animals are generally cuter than people. Secondly, the media portrays animals in a more positive light than people. Thirdly, humans tend to empathize with certain animal species when they see them in danger when they would not do the same for other human beings. Lastly, most people find it easier to emotionally connect with animals due to their different physical makeups and behaviors.

Animals are often used in storytelling to help bring out an emotional response in the reader. Animals are also frequently used to represent the emotions of humans. The reason that people find it easier to emotionally connect with animals is because humans have evolved over time to be able to identify with the physical and behavioral traits of animals.

It is often said that humans are viewed as an “other” who’s different from the rest of the non-human animals. This opinion has recently been challenged by some anthropologists and philosophers who say that we should not view other humans differently from other species, but instead we should view them in a similar way because they share many similarities and also possess certain traits which make them valuable in their own way.

There are many different views on animals and humans. Some people say that humans are more important than animals because they are the ones who control everything. However, others think that it’s not fair to compare humans with animals because humans have much more intelligence and power. They would rather say that both have their own specific strengths.

There is no single answer to this question, so it’s difficult to definitively say which view is right or wrong. What we do know is that all living creatures deserve our respect and attention.

This essay explores three different viewpoints on the question of how society shapes our perception of humanity. The perspectives outline in this essay all hold a key piece of the truth about how humanity is perceived by society. In addition, the essay also discusses the implications that these perspectives have for our future and what we can do to ensure that we can embrace humanity without prejudice.

It seems that every day there is a new development in AI that is changing how people experience life and its many facets. What would you say about a future where AI has taken over everything? Would it be a utopia or a dystopia?

The psychology behind human-animal bonding is very complex. There are many studies that show that animals help people recover from depression, anxiety, and other mental disorders.

Animals provide unconditional love and companionship which can be lacking in many relationships.

Conclusion: How Can We Improve Human Society to Improve Relationships Between People?

This is a question that has been asked for centuries. Recently, many have argued that the key is to have a greater understanding of each other’s cultures and histories.

It’s time to realize that what we learn from history may not always be accurate. We need to stop perpetuating myths and one-sided perspectives on culture from the past.

[marcoweisman]

The Top Five Myths About Writers and Why They’re Wrong

1. A writer is a greedy, money-grubbing

A lot of people think of writing as a job for an artist. But, in reality, most writers are not paid very well and do it more out of passion.

In this digital age, many writers are turning to alternative means of earning a living. While there are some who do make a decent living from their craft, most writers are not paid very well.

2. A writer is a drunk

There are great exceptions like mine; yes, I’m a drunk and I also love legal and illegal drugs, why deny it, who would I fool but myself? But the vast majority of writers are so fucked up in shitty jobs that they don’t have time to lie down on the couch – or on the carpet like me – and devote hours to their most faithful lover, a good bottle of crème de orujo or vodka.

3. A writer is someone who has traveled a lot

One of the greatest writers in history, John of Mandeville, was a desk traveler, so that’s another false myth. We don’t even know today if the Marco Polo story was real or if the guy was just a writer with a lot of imagination.

4. A writer is a womanizer

I don’t know about you, but I spent my teenage years jerking off reading erotica without seeing a single real tit. I suspect that the vast majority of colleagues who are now professional or amateur writers did the same.

5. A writer suffers from writing

The myth of the blank page, who hasn’t heard it? That’s another gross lie because… It’s easy to get inspired and even more so nowadays, you only have to turn on the TV or any social network to see apes aspiring to humans making fools of themselves constantly giving you ideas, from elite athletes to actors to politicians. Long live the show!

And if you disagree with the content of this article…..

Sincerely, fuck you, get off my blog and don’t ever come back. This is my kingdom! 📷

[marcoweisman]

Would Fyodor Dostoevsky Have Written the Same Without Being a Gambler?

In 1866 the writer wrote a novel in which he reflected on his own gambling addiction. After 1871, when his first son was born, Dostoyevsky never played roulette again.

Dostoyevsky (1821-1881), known for his profound psychological novels that reflected the darkest corners of human soul, lived a hard life, but he was also one of those animals and had to cope with gambling addiction. In 1863, despite having lost in roulette for the first time, the origin of the gambler Fyodor Dostoevsky had the idea to write a novel about gambling. Already in 1863 he had the idea to write a story about gambling.

Crime and Punishment is written to be around the same time as The Gambler (Prestupleniye nakazaniye) (1866) and describes a young intellectual called Raskolnikov, who is ready to play with ideas. He decides to solve his problem with a stroke and murders an old pawnbroker and a woman.

He learns the details of General Polina's financial situation from the story of his long-time friend Mr Astley. One day Raskolnikov walks up to Astley in Polinas and swears the oath of bondage to Polinas.

Fyodor Dostoyevsky's guilt and insight into his own gambling addiction, its severity and consequences are described in the letters he wrote his wife to his wife in 1867 with brutal honesty. When he left his new wife Anna, a stenographer who helped him finish The Gambler, he had visited casinos to gain enough money to free himself from his creditors and return to Russia. Following is a summary of Polina's life and details of his gambling addiction based on his private letters and his book, The Call of the Gambler.

This article attempts to examine Fyodor Dostoyevsky's account of gambling in his 1866 novel The Gambler which many believe would have been richer and more accurate if the author had insight into his own gambling addiction. An interesting literary and historical fact is that one of his most famous short novellas "The Gambler," inspired by his own gambling addiction, was written under intense pressure to pay off his gambling debts. His insights into gambling addiction and why he wrote the 1866 book would be more accurate today than what was written.

As my favorite Russian author, Dostoyevsky's best book is not only a profound examination of the human soul, but also evil, violent, ironic, caustic, and sometimes funny. His analysis of gambling addiction is the part of the book that is exemplary. Through the characters and storylines, he reveals his own feelings about roulette and his understanding of gambling and addiction.

Gulakov (1891-1940 ) was known for the mystical novel The Master of Margarita and many other great works and didn't choose to live as a drug addict. Dostoyevsky's first novel, The Poor People, was handed over for publication by a legendary critic, a blowhard named Vissarion Belinsky, who declared him the heir to Gogol. His next novel, Double Minor, about an official lost in the Bureaucracy of Petersburg, was published as a novel months later, but was a critical and commercial failure and a short story followed.

I agreed to a risky contract with F. T. Stellovsky : if I did not deliver the novel with 12 or more signatures by November 1st, 1866, he would acquire the right to publish the work without compensation nine years later, on November 1st, 1875.

Two films were based on Dostoyevsky's life when he wrote the book. There was the Soviet film Twenty-six Days in the Life of Fyodor Dostoyevsky in 1981 and the Hungarian director Karoly Makk's 1997 film The Gambler. S life (1867-1881) is all about betting, risk and the end of his 30-day gambling, which pays off for him.

Mr Astley gave him money and showed little hope that he would not use it for gambling. As a young man who valued rationality and analytical thinking and as one of the most competitive chess players he was convinced of his talent for gambling and began to learn tricks of the trade. He suffered losses in small amounts, but he saw the profits from gambling as a good way to make money instead of having fun and feeling the excitement of taking risks. The usual letter, sent for the first time to an old literary friend, feels like a confession to Dostoyevsky's gambling addiction.

Raskolnikov's friend Razumikhin expresses his distaste for the ideological approach to life that his own life embodies: solving problems with big ideas and dramatic games of chance, rather than with slow, steady, hard work. Henri Trojan's fiery, old-fashioned novel on FD's life is great reading but I decided to ride the wave of pleasure and to take the moment to plough through the heavy Dostoyevsky sitting on my shelves, including selected letters and joyless prose from Konstantin Mochulsky's critical biography.

In "Finding a Gambler," Dostoyevsky taught medical and non-medical professionals about gambling and its consequences in letters to his wife. Consideration is also given to the psychiatric aspects of his pathology as a gambling disorder.

[marcoweisman]

Book Review of Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoevsky

When we were in college, nobody read Fyodor Dostoevsky anymore. I remember how my classmates read the thousands of summaries that were circulating on the Internet, but none of them read the book. They didn’t need it either. I had to work at that book for a couple of years before it suddenly and like a miracle found its way into my hands. I remember I read it in Berlin, where I was in residence, during my graduate years. I was staying in the different hostels and Dostoevsky was my roommate. Now I will tell you about my roommate. His name was Thomas. He was something of a chess fanatic. He was older than I, 28 to my 21, and he also was a fan of Dostoevsky, although he had never actually read him. He had a huge collection of Thomas Hardy, for example, in Russian, and I had no idea what Hardy was about. The one thing I did know was that Hardy was a famous English author, which I could always find a book about. But I didn’t have much else going for me. This Thomas would stay up all night working his way through the evening newspapers. He was fascinated by world events.

What impressed me most in Crime and Punishment is Fyodor Dostoevsky’s profound Platonic, Hegelian and Christian idealism. While he presents the ideals of God, of Justice and of beauty with great sincerity and simplicity, he also puts forth the idea that they are impossible to attain.

As long as man is an animal, he has the inability to act “intellectually and unselfishly”.

If one can develop that ability, he will attain perfection.

The author says that all of these ideals have to do with an existential struggle between the mind and the external world.

However, I disagree that these ideals are unattainable.

In his love for Rodion Romanov, Fyodor Dostoevsky seeks for the unattainable and in order to obtain it, he struggles against the materialistic world and says that only he himself can lead him to it.

Since he is a man of faith, he is also striving to achieve the unattainable.

Dostoevsky depicts in Crime and Punishment the faults of humanity in general, and people in particular.

The concept of justice in the novel is a riddle to humanity.

Justice is, according to Dostoevsky, the tendency to do the right thing as a moral standard of order, for both individuals and groups.

This concept does not necessarily depend on common sense or empirical knowledge; the readers are to think themselves into the mind of the murderers.

Crime and Punishment provides the audience with a play-by-play of the characters’ psychological struggles.

[marcoweisman]

Book Review of The Mission House by Carys Davies

The Mission House is a very pink book, written by bestseller Carys Davies, about a young British woman who has to go thousands of miles away from home to discover the meaning of life, not even alcohol and drugs could throw it up in the harsh reality of her ordinary life.

Maybe it's all good just as it is. It's also not the biggest book in the world.

The book had some great writing, but some issues that could be exploited.

The first one, the heroine, has the worst facial expressions ever! Her facial expressions in the book are like a bear's judging me for my cooking.

There are fragments, such as the one about the arrival in India, that any British teenager on a trip of dens and booze could have written with more quality. Of course, the highlight of the book may be the story of the state of the British and Indian commons, the idea that no man is so great that he does not deserve to be accountable for what he does with the resources he uses. It has often been expressed in the words of my drinking buddy in Berlin, Richard Wright: "It's the poor who have to pay for the rich, the dirty poor who have to pay for the clean."