mechanical-sunchild
mechanical-sunchild
Only together do the pieces make a picture.
2K posts
Follows/likes from Kevin--of-desert-bluffs! See pinned for full info! 🤖���🩸
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
mechanical-sunchild · 13 hours ago
Text
I am indigenous, and as gently as possible, it is not racist to say that you cannot literally physically literally transform into an animal, not regarding body modification related things.
188 notes · View notes
mechanical-sunchild · 1 day ago
Note
what's orthohuman? /genq
>Hi! So I'm not the person who coined this term, so I'm gonna link it so I don't explain it poorly! Hope that's ok!_
>There's also further reading here~_
2 notes · View notes
mechanical-sunchild · 1 day ago
Note
>Otherkin as a term includes anything you can possibly think of. You can be an animal, a mythical creature (animalistic), a mythical creature (humanoid), a fictional human, a sci-fi creature or humanoid, an object, a plant, a concept etc. It may have been popularised by elves and other mythical humanoids/creatures (I believe one of the first users was a dwarf/centaur?) and KFFers seem to have concluded it's only about fictional characters but it's original intention was a catch-all for any kind of nonhuman 'being that thing' identity_
>However, it's important to note that it's not an umbrella term the way nonhuman or alterhuman is. Whilst those terms were coined with the idea of grouping a variety of experiences and labels together, otherkin is only meant to describe/give name to being a wide variety of nonhuman species/races_
Genuinely, does the term Otherkin refer to anyone who is not fully human (an umbrella term), or does it refer to humanoid nonhumans (elves, fairies, mermaids, etc.)? Because I've seen it used for both and I don't know if it includes the second one or not
🐾
19 notes · View notes
mechanical-sunchild · 2 days ago
Text
A MESSAGE TO ALL RABBITS AND HORSES
just peel a fuckken carrotand eat it brahh thisshit is so goooodfuuuuuck
11 notes · View notes
mechanical-sunchild · 2 days ago
Text
i'm so sick of proshipper agenda invalidating the fact that over a thousand fics exist of me being in a romantic and often sexual relationship with a man i very much view as a father and the fact that this makes me EXCEEDINGLY uncomfortable. every time i complain? 'ichigo you're a prude/supporting censorship.' ugh.
43 notes · View notes
mechanical-sunchild · 2 days ago
Text
The Narnia Theory: How to Separate Fiction from Reality in Alterhuman Discourse
Lexidius "BlackStatic" Storm, 2024-2025
Alterhuman Non-fiction, Discourse, Fandom Meta
!! CONTENT WARNINGS FOR MENTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING TOPICS !!
- ableism and sanism
- abuse
- cyberbullying
- depersonalizarion, derealization and dissociation
- delusion and unreality
- discourse, "fandom wank" and gatekeeping
- doxxing of private information
- harassment and stalking
- (the invalidation of) identity politics
- (the invalidation of) mental illness
- pro-fiction, darkfiction and related content
- self harm and suicidal ideation
IF ANY OF THESE TOPICS ARE TRIGGERING OR DISTRESSING TO YOU, PLEASE TURN BACK NOW AND DO NOT CONTINUE READING. OTHERWISE, PROCEED WITH CAUTION. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.
Over my last 20 or so years growing up on the internet, much of that time has been spent engaging with fictional media and discussing the characters, worlds and events of said media online in various fandom spaces. Much of my early adolescence was spent on IRC chat servers and fan site forums - shout out to PKMN.net for being one of those first places I hung out between 2006 and 2009 - and this was often in the form of roleplaying as original characters within these fantasy worlds.
However, as an alterhuman teenager with then-undiagnosed neurodivergence at the time, being new and uneducated on virtual spaces and how to engage with them safely often posed difficulties when learning where to draw the line between fiction and reality. The escapism that roleplay and fandom can present is often a welcome relief from the struggles of everyday life and it can be extremely tempting to log on and shut off to the outside world, living within the fictional world of an online game or as the self insert character of a particularly compelling roleplay. And there is nothing wrong with having these outlets - as a fictionkin with beliefs in reincarnation and multiverse theory, being able to imagine myself "back in my former lives" can be incredibly cathartic after a stressful day. There are also times when fiction can present as a healthy outlet for real-world traumas or forms of psychological distress to be processed and recontextualized within a safer, imaginary environment in ways that can be beneficial and therapeutic for healing past pains and grievances.
The problem, though, arises when people get stuck in this fiction-based mindset and express difficulties in separating this virtual world from the tangible one.
In my last two decades or so online, I have been on both sides of the fence when it comes to others seeking to find mutual escapism within a fictional world. A recent phenomenon within fandom spaces, especially amongst fictionkin, is persons seeking out others who feel a particularly strong connection to these fictional universes and looking for "canonmates" who share similar source media. Oftentimes, this can include particular divergences from canon events within the source media in the form of "fanon", "alternate universe" or "AU timeline", and searching for a canonmate from a specific AU becomes a priority for these fictionfolk.
Now there is nothing inherently wrong with this intimate of a connection to the source media, nor with the longing for kinship amongst others who feel similarly; a lot of fandom experiences are formed through a mutual understanding and appreciation with the source media on this deeper level. The problems, however, arise in these situations when three things present themselves:
A) the person struggles to differentiate between the established canon of the media and fanon or personal beliefs (known as "headcanon").
B) the person struggles to differentiate between the fictional world the media exists in and the physical world, where certain laws and societal expectations may not align.
C) the person begins to project these headcanons/fanon beliefs onto themselves or others, failing to recognize how certain perceived canonmates may not match with these expectations.
These examples can often lead to experiences of dissociation, depersonalization, existentialism and potential abuse within fandom spaces, particularly among roleplayers and even moreso amongst alterhuman people who identify with the fictionkin label. In extreme cases where fiction and reality are not kept separate, example B can potentially lead to a strong detachment from reality and cause a person to act problematically and may raise concerns about the committing of immoral acts or crimes (eg. in a source media where murder is normalized, a person who is fictionkin with a homicidal character may feel as though physical assault is justifiable within the real world; it should be noted though that this fictional hypothetical is an extreme example and should not be used to profile any real-world individuals who resonate with this kind of media as inherently murderous people).
Thankfully, problematic behaviours are generally frowned upon by society and fandom spaces will for the most part try to prevent individuals from blending fiction and reality too heavily. Any actions that could be seen as immoral or unjust within the real world are often met with heavy criticism and a particularly vocal percentage of fandom individuals will make these views clear by screening or "policing" fandom of immoral actions and particularly problematic content.
This isn't without its own problems, though, as discourse between "pro-fiction" and "anti" spaces grows rampant within fandom. This discourse can lead to harassment, stalking and bullying of individuals within fandom spaces, often leading to serious real-world consequences for the persons being targeted. Many individuals caught up in this "pro vs anti" discourse - particularly over certain portrayals of a character or scenario ocurring within the media - can end up with people experiencing prolongued negative effects to their mental health; in extreme cases, some persons regularly exposed to this kind of heavy and inflammatory discourse may be drawn to attempt self harm or the taking their own lives, with these feelings stemming from controversial and heated fandom opinions online.
This is not okay, especially regarding younger persons within fandom spaces. Everyone should have the right to engage with fandom and media in whatever way they like, provided that no harm is being done and no problematic or immoral actions are being endorsed or acted upon outside the realm of fiction. This also has the effect of painting these fandoms and their source media in a bad light, disallowing these spaces to be safe and accessible for newcomers.
So how do we prevent these dangerous and problematic situations from happening in the real world, while still allowing individuals the right to express themselves freely within a fictional setting?
Allow me to present to you something that I like to call the Narnia Theory.
One important thing to note about storytelling is that although there are likely many influences from day-to-day life that shape the characters and their narrative within a made up story, presenting very impactful themes that can have deep emotional resonance to real world events within the lives of the reader, a story set in a made-up world is still fictitious and should be treated as such. While it is true that a real-world scenario can exist wherein a child can indeed be tempted to do wicked deeds by a mysterious stranger with a plate of Turkish Delight, the credibility of an evil ice sorceress from a magical frozen land inside the back of a wardrobe is yet to be proven as factual. As far as the reader should be concerned, the fantasy world of Narnia exists purely within the pages of the book and when it is time for the reader to return to reality and pay a monthly electricity bill, empty the dishwasher or feed the family dog his dinner for the night, our wise talking lion and his whimsical friends in Narnia are conveniently placed on pause back in the folded pages of the book to return to at another time. Aslan hadn't gone anywhere and the Ice Queen hasn't won yet - they're just being put back in the wardrobe for later.
The important thing then, especially for people regularly exposed to and/or engaging with high levels of discourse around fictional media, is to master the art of
A) being able to keep Narnia safely confined within the wardrobe in a way that doesn't let the lion escape to do damage in the outside world, while at the same time,
B) not belittling or invalidating the people currently engaging with the wardrobe, who see the internal Narnia as a place that feels just as real as the world outside of that wardrobe, or possibly even more real than the external world.
There is a practice that was taught to me by a good friend of mine, a theatre director at my local drama club, which has served me well when performing as Benvolio for our 2025 performance of Romeo and Juliet. Before each rehearsal, our director instructs us to close our eyes and imagine a door into the world of Verona, which we enter through to "step into character" for the duration of our performance. While the actors are through the doorway, they are fully in character and embracing the roles of the fiery Tybalt, the playful Mercutio, the arrogant Paris and the lovestruck Romeo. But when rehearsals are over for the day, each actor is advised to step back out of character again, closing that door and keeping the Montagues and Capulets safely locked within, where Benvolio doesn't have to try and part a fight in the street with the real-world equivalent of Sampson and Gregory. With Benvolio, Juliet, Friar Lawrence and the rest of the characters contained in their own Narnia Wardrobe, the cloak of that character has been hung up on the shelf to come out again at a later date and, beyond the boundaries of that padlocked door, no murders are taking place and no lovestruck teenagers have to be exiled from Verona for their bloodshed. These things are still very real and prevalent on the stage, within the context of the story Shakespeare is trying to tell convincingly, but the stage is like an enclosure for the animals to be contained in. Narnia's lion is leashed and won't go running off into the audience to maul anyone for sleeping with Lord Capulet's daughter.
There's some difficulties, of course, to mastering this practice of stepping in and out of the wardrobe. As a Benvolio fictionkin who spiritually resonates quite strongly with the role I have been given by my director in this play, there are times when I have to remember that my past life memories don't necessarily dictate what I have been told to portray on stage. I may wish to reenact my kin memories in a very specific way that reflects on the version of Benvolio that I was in my own particular recollection of Verona - an anxious young man who strived to keep the peace at his own expense, someone who shakes in his boots when confronted by the judgement of Prince Escalus as his cousin Romeo faces exile - but my director's vision of Benvolio is that of a rebellious, hotheaded punk who bites his thumb in Lord Capulet's face just as confidently and mischievously as Mercutio lifts up the skirts of Juliet's nurse and mocks her for having the promiscuity of an old hare hoar. These are things I have to keep in mind when I put on the Stage Benvolio cloak and, when requested, keep the Kin Benvolio standing in the doorway where he may step in at times but isn't always needed.
Sometimes, it's okay to have one foot in Narnia and one outside Narnia. Provided, of course, that the sword is kept on the Narnia side.
17 notes · View notes
mechanical-sunchild · 3 days ago
Text
Yeah, I honestly prefer 'essay' posts and people just generally sharing their experiences than 'meme' posts so I try to mostly make those myself too. Which is the only way to combat seeing too much of the kind of posts you don't like that I've found lol
i feel like the tumblr community for alterhuman has become a lot more “domesticated” or domestic-animals focused. don’t get me wrong, i relate to some of these thing but to me the main appeal of being an animal is being free! tags like #alterhuman are becoming increasingly filled with “im so puppy” memes instead of serious conversations which is why i came to tumblr in the first place!
20 notes · View notes
mechanical-sunchild · 3 days ago
Text
>I really like android, Wolfman and golden lion tamarin related viviterms being used for me I wish more did it irl especially android ones_
1 note · View note
mechanical-sunchild · 4 days ago
Text
Had a good dream shift last night. I consider it a dream shift because usually if I dream of being a werewolf the form is indistinct or partial or even imaginary in context. This time I was me though, a Wolfman and for some reason I was being really protective over a couple of kids? There may have been some Protector/Big Daddy noemata mixed in there lol
5 notes · View notes
mechanical-sunchild · 5 days ago
Text
>It can certainly be a gateway into realising you're genuinely kin though!_
>It's all <<haha no I just like them a lot...>> until it's not_
"lol I act so much like ___ I guess I kin them" "I love ___ so much I guess I kin ___"
THAT'S NOT WHAT IT MEAANSS
Tumblr media
270 notes · View notes
mechanical-sunchild · 5 days ago
Text
questions I have for fictionkins:
I’m a bit confused on what exactly it actually means like I get identifying with a fictional species like dragons or unicorns or whatever.
but I don’t know what it means when someone identifies as a fictional character.
like do you have the same personality as the character so you feel you are them?
do you actually think you are that character and therefore you have lived their whole life story?
do you think the creator of the character created you in a way?
is it more of a past life situation where you think you lived as them at some point?
all of this is asked with genuine curiosity because I’m confused.
24 notes · View notes
mechanical-sunchild · 6 days ago
Text
Posting this on tumblr because i do NOT trust tiktok to not have a good faith answer
Does the specification of other paw, otherkin, etc. and not blanket stating “therian” really matter all that much? Im honestly confused and curious
63 notes · View notes
mechanical-sunchild · 7 days ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
363 notes · View notes
mechanical-sunchild · 7 days ago
Text
Tumblr media
What I see when a nonhuman walks into a room
58 notes · View notes
mechanical-sunchild · 7 days ago
Text
Hybrid — A New Umbrella Under Alterhumanity
Tumblr media
The hybrid flag represents those who are hybrids in some way, shape or form. Hybrids are those whose ‘types do not align in a typical standard way. Hybrids are just that — hybrids of two or more creatures, whether fictional or real.
Hybrids’ ‘types are not one or the other. For example, my wife is a rabbitgirl hybrid — she is not just a rabbit, or just a female human, and she is not defined as being a mix of the two — rather, she is one new, whole, complete thing.
This is how hybrids are defined. While they are obviously a mixture of two or more creatures, this may not always be apparent when looking at them. Some hybrids are more difficult to spot as hybrids. Anyone can be a hybrid if that is how they feel.
Hybrid, as a term, parallels words like therian. It denotes a specific type of otherkin identification separate from others, but it intersects often.
Color Meanings
Violet: Represents the rarity of hybrids and their uniqueness and strength; shows their willingness to stand out despite not always being recognized, like ultraviolet rays.
Violet Gradient: Each bar of a lighter violet represents parts of a hybrid that are different from their parent species. They represent diversity, change, growth, secrecy and longing, as well as the inherent interconnectedness that exists within them as a result of being a hybrid.
Gray Vertical Stripe: Represents the gray area of being a hybrid; the feeling that you are not just one thing, you are both, and the recognition that that also makes you one new unique thing. As gray is a mixture of black and white, it represents the uncertainty, but also self assuredness and identity.
White Vertical Stripe: Represents a hybrid’s personality, their identity, their soul — who they are inside, separate from their hybridism. This stripe represents wholeness in personality and existence.
Black Spiral: Represents the identity of being two or more things at once, but that you are still one form with a right to be you. Represents a head and brain and a spinal cord coming down, to show the deep thinking and identity balance hybrids have to commit to in order to understand themselves.
164 notes · View notes
mechanical-sunchild · 8 days ago
Text
>{PERSON} discourse really drains my battery_
>Because of the world we live in it's important to recognize non/alterhumans as people or not being a person as in human [individual depending] but having nonhuman personhood_
>And many of us see theriform animals as their own kind of people too often by extension_
>But if someone does not wish to be referred to that way when you speak to them_
>It's easy to just not do so_
>I could argue about it till I rust_
>But I think it really is as simple as no matter how important personhood is one does not need to be referred to as one to have the -hood and respect it comes with at the very least within this community_
>But also it needs to be acknowledged that others are not comfortable with 'creature' or 'being' and prefer person/people even though they're fully nonhuman_
>Respecting language preferences discourse really shouldn't have gone on this long_
>Because even if you are genuinely worried that the one you're talking to who is firm that they are not a person is saying so in an unsafe way or for unsafe reasons it's not your business in the end_
>On the flip side those posting reminders of why personhood means something aren't necessarily attacking non-person creatures_
>Maybe it's time we let this lay a bit and went back to blocking those we don't like_
{{CC500: MEME ATTACHED}}
Tumblr media
23 notes · View notes
mechanical-sunchild · 10 days ago
Text
i dont normally hang around in exclusively therian corners of the internet these days but i find the amount of redundant labels interesting.
to be clear, this isnt an issue exclusive to them, nor do i think theyre somehow less for it lmao. this isnt one of those weird elitism posts.
it makes me realize how long ive been around haha. not a greymuzzle by any stretch but i made this blog a good 4? years ago and was interacting with the community an extra year or two before that from my other main. and before that i was searching up terms in forums and online to use with my little pack that all sorta awakened together.
seeing the language shift so fast has me a little worried though. not only are we fragmented across several platforms, but now older and newer therians are using different language. with so many terms it can be hard to find other critters like you.
maybe i see it differently because im one of the ""unacceptables"" in sanatized spaces, but the community already feels so fragmented. folks naturally wanna find others who share their experience, and prioritize relationships with those similar folks. now that experience is unintentionally fragmented across two, three, or maybe more terms and it makes communication tricky.
maybe im just being an old head though.
quick edit: and this isnt to say i think folks are wrong for coining terms they feel suit them better. i dont have anything against microlabels. do what you want!
62 notes · View notes