#3.2GHz

[jorvikzelda]

Tech friends, I need your help.

I'm choosing between 2 laptops to buy. We'll call them laptop 1 and 2, for the sake of simplicity. (I'm in no hurry to buy one, mine works... just fine... but not great. It struggles when I have too many tabs open in Chrome, and is lagging as I write this post with literally only Discord open in the background. I'm sure you can imagine how it handles any heavier program. Yes I made a mistake by cheaping out when I could afford better, yes I am aware of this, yes I regret it deeply, let's move on.)

Laptop 1 is about 100 dollars/euros/1000 SEK cheaper.

They both have OLED screens with approximately the screen resolution: laptop 1 has a 15.6" display with 2880 x 1620 resolution (16:9) and laptop 2 has a 14" display with 2880 x 1800 resolution (16:10). My current laptop has a 14" display with 1920 x 1080 resolution (16:9) so either way it's a pretty big upgrade. In terms of size alone, I prefer the 15.6". (Laptop 1 weighs 1.8kg and laptop 2 weighs 1.45kg, which is not enough of a difference that it really matters to me.)

Laptop 1 has a higher refresh rate (120Hz vs 90Hz on laptop 2).

Their processors are both AMD Ryzen 7s (8 cores, 16 threads, 16GB RAM) with equal base clock speed (3.2GHz), but laptop 1 has a Ryzen 7 5800H while laptop 2 has a Ryzen 7 6800H. The two processors use different RAM types (5800H uses DDR4 RAM & 6800H uses LPDDR5 SDRAM (though it is fully possible that the 5800H also uses SDRAM and the sites I'm looking at just aren't telling me)). 5800H has a higher peak temperature (105 Celsius vs. 95 Celsius). The 6800H has a higher turbo clock speed (4.7GHz vs. 4.4GHz).

They both have the same graphics card (NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050), they both ship with Windows 11, and they both have 1TB of storage space.

Ultimately, I think the main question is whether laptop 2's better processor makes a big enough difference that it negates laptop 1's comfort of a bigger display and justifies the price difference despite it being smaller... and I do not know enough about laptops to make the call there.

("Build your own PC" and "buy a desktop PC" are both advice I will not take because I do not own or have space for a desk.)

(They're both Asus Vivobook Pro OLEDs: laptop 1 is M6500QC-MA025W and laptop 2 is M6400RC-KM001W, and more specifically, they cost 15990 SEK and 16990 SEK. My current laptop is also an ASUS Vivobook but I don't even think they make it anymore because it's so bad. It has a 2-core Ryzen 3 processor and 128GB of storage space.)

[andmaybegayer]

@blackhawk-4904 said on this post:

#8W… wow! #wonder how that little power draw performs for more intensive workloads

It takes so little to get me to measure something. Here's some notes I took while doing these measurements. Pretty graph up front:

We've got power from high to low on the x-axis, blue line showing absolute performance in Cinebench measured on the left y-axis, and orange line showing relative performance to the 20W run in percentage points on the right y-axis.

These would look nicer but the power cut and I don't want to figure out how to install GNUplot on Windows. It's a mingw thing.

For context, the top score of 5300 here is about what you'd expect to get from a stock 6700k, which was a top of the line processor in 2015 that drew about five times as much power.

You can see that efficiency goes way up as we drop power right up until 5W, once we hit 3W efficiency takes a dive because of a variety of reasons. If you're wondering why efficiency dives at 25W, check the 25W section of the results for an explanation. Now, more details about testing method and the raw data, as well as a semi-rambling conclusion.

I'm back in Windows to investigate the sensor hub so I'm going to use Windows benchmarks, namely Cinbench. If you want to copy these numbers, fortunately RyzenController (a frontend to RyzenAdj) works on Linux and Windows and have identical interfaces wherever you use it.

Test Setup

Constants

Laptop is plugged in to power, set in HP's performance mode and maxed out the performance slider in Windows. Set up in tented mode for maximum cooling performance. Only one run each, so give these numbers maybe ±5% leeway for run to run variation.

Numbers

I'm not taking detailed power metrics, aside from the one time I note it I'm just assuming that the power controller is holding it dead at whatever I set. That's true for most metrics, although there's about a 200mW negative offset in the measured value so if you really want to adjust for that. My performance numbers are coming out of Cinebench R23. The numbers I got on default settings seem to agree with consensus, so I think I got it set up right.

Comparisons

I'm going to treat the flat 20W score as my baseline for power and performance. I'll also provide a power/performance ratio that is basically a reference to how well this setup uses each watt compared to the baseline, so e.g. a 120% ratio gets 20% more performance per watt. Cinebench scores are roughly linear, if I remember correctly.

Results

default power settings:

spikes to 25W and 4GHz briefly, sits at about 20W and 3.1-3.3GHz for most of the test.

Score 5209, 97% performance, variable power.

25W flat limit:

pretty much the same as default, there's pretty hard baked in limits in the processor that would require a change in the overall TDP-up/down setting that aren't possible without bios flips that this laptop doesn't support.

Score of 5423. 102% performance, 125% power. Ratio of 82%.

(note: this power value is exaggerated, actual power would probabaly be like 21W. No reason to set this mode.)

20W flat limit:

I'm going to use this as my benchmark point for power and performance, since it seems to be the maximum the cooling system can deliver. Nice and flat at 3.1-3.2GHz.

Score of 5316. 100% performance, 100% power. Ratio of 100%. Mathematics, everyone.

15W flat limit:

Base clock town more or less, this device is rated for 2.38GHz at 15W, and this sits at about 2.7-2.9GHz for the bulk of the run.

Score of 4789. 90% performance, 75% power. Ratio of 120%

8W flat limit:

Well controlled, no real spikes, sits at about 2.1-2.2GHz.

Score of 3607. 68% performance, 40% power. Ratio of 170%.

5W flat limit:

Also controlled, below base clock and sitting at 1.4GHz more or less dead, which is nothing to sneeze at. Given that idle power here is about 2W we're not much above quiescent, and basic life support power is taking over as the main source of power consumption. I think this is about as low as I'd go and I'd probably set up 8W base or 5W base 8W long-term boost if I was trying to save power, you're losing a lot of performance for not much less power, you'll see the efficiency ratio is barely any better than 8W.

Score of 2351. 44% performance, 25% power. Ratio of 176%.

3W flat limit:

the lowest you can go with RyzenAdj, well, well below base clock. Horrendously slow, cinebench took FOREVER, I am demonstrating serious commitment by waiting this one out, welcome to one fifth of base clock town, each core is only pulling about 200mW, and clocks down to 430MHz, since 430x6 is only 2580 you could definitely just run one core six times this fast, probably for only a watt more and you'd lose the multithreading overhead. This definitely wastes power by just taking so goddamn long to do anything. Dont do this.

Terrible score of 682. 13% performance, 15% power. Ratio of 87%.

Conclusion

You can get significant efficiency improvements on this thing by slightly limiting your power. Dropping to just 15W already represents a 20% efficiency gain, and at 8W you gain 70% efficiency and only give up about 30% of your absolute performance.

If the kind of tasks you're doing are going to demand the whole-ass processor, 8W is probably the sweet spot, great performance and efficiency. If you're just tooling around on the desktop, watching a movie, editing text, etc. 5W has a decent overall power drop that might arrest some unwanted power spikes but is otherwise not a huge improvement over 8W.

I'm probably going to go with 8W base with a tightly constrained 15W boost setting, since 15W achieves a huge proportion of the overall performance and will probably help with some bursty workloads.

[gec-engineering]

Project ROVER!

Project ROVER is a new robotic platform that is being developed in collaboration with Global Communication Services, GEC Engineering, WVLT, and Project ROVER for law enforcement and emergency use. ROVER is a small, four-wheeled robot that is equipped with a variety of sensors, devices, components and capabilities, including:

    BLE tracking: ROVER can follow officers into a building using Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) technology. This allows officers to enter a building without having to worry about losing track of their robot. This follow-behind technology allows an operator in a command center to see live video of officer movement and situational awareness.

    Live camera view: ROVER can provide an operator outside a building with a live camera view of the environment. This allows the operator to see what the robot is seeing and to give the robot commands.

    Software Defined RF Grid Mapping: ROVER can do RF Grid Mapping, which logs the RF signal strength against the LiDAR at points within the grid. This can be used to identify areas of poor RF coverage or to map out the location of radio-emitting devices.

   Software Defined Deployable bi-directional amplifier: ROVER can act as a deploy-able bi-directional amplifier for Land Mobile Radios in the 100MHZ to 3.2GHZ range. This can be used to improve the signal strength of radios in areas with poor reception.

   Software Defined Capabilities to stand up a ad-hoc cellular network for use to locate individuals during search and rescue missions.

ROVER is a versatile platform that can be used for a variety of law enforcement tasks, including:

    Search and rescue: ROVER can be used to search for missing persons or victims of natural disasters.

    Patroling: ROVER can be used to patrol areas that are difficult or dangerous for officers to access, such as high-crime areas or areas with hazardous materials.

    Evidence collection: ROVER can be used to collect evidence from crime scenes.

    Disaster response: ROVER can be used to help with disaster response efforts.

    Active Shooter Response: ROVER can be deployed to assist in active shooter response by providing live video, LiDAR mapping, and in-building radio coverage enhancement.

ROVER is still under development, but it has the potential to be a valuable tool for law enforcement. It is a versatile platform that can be used for a variety of tasks, and it can help to improve officer safety and effectiveness.

How ROVER Works

ROVER is powered by a lithium-ion battery and has a top speed of 5 mph. It is equipped with a variety of sensors, including a 360-degree camera, a LiDAR scanner, a BLE receiver, and a software-defined radio provided by WVLT..

The 360-degree camera allows ROVER to see its surroundings in all directions. The LiDAR scanner allows ROVER to create a 3D map of its environment. The BLE receiver allows ROVER to follow officers using BLE technology. The software-defined radio allows ROVER to do RF Grid Mapping and to act as a deploy-able bi-directional amplifier.

ROVER is controlled by an operator who uses a remote control. The operator can use the remote control to move ROVER around, to pan and tilt the camera, and to give ROVER commands.

Benefits of Using ROVER

There are a number of benefits to using ROVER, including:

    Increased officer safety: ROVER can help to increase officer safety by allowing officers to enter dangerous or hazardous environments without having to put themselves at risk.

    Improved situational awareness: ROVER can help to improve officer situational awareness by providing officers with a live camera view of the environment. This can help officers to identify potential threats and to make better decisions.

    Increased efficiency: ROVER can help to increase officer efficiency by allowing officers to focus on other tasks, such as investigating a crime scene or providing medical assistance.

Conclusion

Project ROVER is a new robotic platform that has the potential to be a valuable tool for law enforcement. It is a versatile platform that can be used for a variety of tasks, and it can help to improve officer safety and effectiveness.

· Official website of the project: https://www.roverrobot.org/

· The official website of the project on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/project-rover-inc/about/

· Leaders and members of the company:

· Brian Martin CEO: https://www.linkedin.com/in/brian-martin--/

· Dhruv A. — director: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dhruv-a-72662166/

· Mike Matranga — President: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mike-matranga-23b59427/

· Anthony Ferguson — Secretary: https://www.linkedin.com/in/anthony-j-ferguson/

· Engineering Team CTO: https://www.linkedin.com/in/oleg-gridin-74563a226/

· Engineering team: https://gec-engineering.tech/about-us/

[onedirectdeals]

GEEKOM A5 Mini PC, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H(8C/16T, up to 4.4GHz), 32GB DDR4&512GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD, Vega 8 Graphics, Windows 11 Pro Desktop Computer Support 8K UHD

Price: Buy Now Last Updated: From the brand A Series Air Series IT Series AE Series AX Series GT Series XT Series [Powerful AMD Mini Desktop PC] Experience superior computing with the GEEKOM A5 mini PC, boasting an AMD Ryzen 7 5800H processor. With 8 Cores, 16 Threads, and speeds ranging from 3.2GHz to 4.4GHz, it’s designed for robust performance. Pre-installed with Windows 11 Pro, enjoy…

[rwoshop]

Quantum U8L Core i9 RTX 4090 2TB 32GB DDR5 Gaming PC We have a great collection of Gaming PC's in our online shop. Our shop includes other essential Gaming equipment like GPUs, Gaming Chairs, CPUs and much more. Lets improve your gaming experience today with the Quantum U8L Core i9 RTX 4090 2TB 32GB DDR5 Gaming PC. https://www.remoteworkingoffice.com/product/quantum-u8l-core-i9-rtx-4090-2tb-32gb-ddr5-gaming-pc/?feed_id=5396&_unique_id=66d4b9773a964 #gaming #gamingpc #fortnite #pcgamer #gamer #cod #callofduty

[vsngrv]

BSアンテナケーブルの交換

最近、1階のTVでBSアンテナの出力レベルがゼロになる不具合が多発していた。

最初はBS分配器が片方のケーブルからしかBSアンテナへの電源供給が行われない事が原因と思ったが、BS分配器の資料を集めると全通電で、これが原因ではないと判明した。

残るはケーブルとアンテナどちらかの不具合(TVの電源供給機能が壊れたとは考えにくい)と思われたが、改めてBS分配器を見ると、1階側のケーブルが経年劣化でボロボロになり、今にも千切れそうになっている事に気が付いた。試しに触れてみたら、あっさりと千切れてしまった。しかも接続部分だけではなく、ケーブル全体がヒビだらけになっている。交換以外に解決する手段はなかった。

最初はBS4Kに備えて3.2GHz対応のSHマーク付きケーブルを購入する事も考えたが、折からの物価高で家計に余裕はない。仕方なく既存の2.6GHz対応のケーブルに交換する事に決定。しかし家にある十分な長さのケーブルは既に両端がコネクタ接続済み。このままでは壁の穴にケーブルを通せないため、一度切って再度コネクタを接続した。

1階からのみBSアンテナへ電源を供給する設定でテストを行い、無事映る事を確認。BS4Kは映すためのBSアンテナも、BS分配器も、TVもないため、当面はこれで構わないだろう。

追伸:

短時間の視聴では問題ないようだが、ある程度長時間視聴していると唐突にBSアンテナの出力レベルがゼロになるようだ。今の所2階のTVではそのような奇妙な症状は起きていない。問題の切り分けとして次の2段階の検証が必要だ。

➊BSアンテナ本体とBS分配器をつなぐケーブルを新調する。

これで問題が解消するなら、この部分のケーブルの経年劣化が原因だ。

➋BS分配器を新調する。

これで問題が解決するなら、BS分配器の経年劣化が原因だ。

もしこれでも解決しないなら、TVのBSアンテナ電源供給回路ないしユニットの故障となり、TVを買い換えるしかないだろう。1階のTVは2010年12月に購入したもので、メーカーの部品保有期限は当に過ぎている。安価なHDTVで当座を凌ぐか、思い切って4KTVに買い換えるか。後者ならBSアンテナ周りも全て4K(3.2GHz)対応の製品に買い換えないと全ての4Kチャンネルが映らない。頭の痛い選択となる。

あるいはBSアンテナ自体に何か問題が発生しているかも知れない。全通電のBS分配器で2台のTVから同時にBSアンテナに向けて電源が供給された場合にどのような処理をBSアンテナ側で行っているか判らないからだ。今のBSアンテナ確か2007年頃に初代BSアンテナから付け替えた物で、電源供給は録画機器(レコーダー)から常時供給される事を前提とした設計になっているはず。今のように常時供給が不可能なTVが登場する前だ。BS分配器が防波堤となっているならBSアンテナの設計がどうであれ問題はないのだが。

TVかBSアンテナ自体か問題の切り分けが難しい可能性が出てきた。一番簡単な解決方法は、4KTVに買い換えてBSアンテナ周りも全て4K対応製品に換えてしまう事だ。

[alvatech]

LENOVO AIO 3 22ADA6 -ABID (Black)/ACID (White) AMD3020E 8GB-SSD 512 HDD WIN

Spesifikasi : Processor : AMD Athlon™ Silver 3050U (2C / 2T, 2.3 / 3.2GHz, 1MB L2 / 4MB L3) Graphics : Integrated AMD Radeon™ Graphics Chipset : AMD SoC Platform Memory : 8GB (2x 4GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2400) Memory Slots : Two DDR4 SO-DIMM slots, dual-channel capable Max Memory : Up to 16GB DDR4-2400 OFFERING Storage : 512GB SSD M.2 2280 PCIe® NVMe® Storage Support : Up to two drives, 1x 2.5″ HDD + 1x…

[tooobjectangel]

👉제품구매 바로가기

✅ HP 2022 최신 15 15.6인치 노트북 컴퓨터 인텔 코어 i3 1115G4 3.2GHz (비트 i5-10210U) 8GB DDR4 RAM 256GB PCIe SSD Wi-Fi✅

🔥오늘의추천광고

🌱이 포스팅은 쿠팡 파트너스 활동의 일환으로, 이에 따른 일정액의 수수료를 제공받습니다.

[thuevpsgiarervn]

Quá trình hình thành của máy chủ

Thường thì mọi chỉ nghe về định nghĩa của máy chủ là gì? Tuy nhiên, ít người biết rằng từ “máy chủ (server)” xuất phát từ đâu. Thuật ngữ này có nguồn gốc từ các thuật toán “Hộp đen” (Black-box) và “Hàng đợi” (Queue). Đây là một thuật toán xử lý dữ liệu đầu vào và trả về kết quả cho người dùng.

Quá trình hình thành của máy chủ

Để hiểu rõ hơn về quá trình hình thành của máy chủ, hãy điểm qua các sự kiện quan trọng sau:

1981 – Xuất hiện máy chủ đầu tiên là IBM VM (LIST SERVER). Máy chủ LIST SERVER chạy trên hệ thống ảo BITNET của IBM, mở đường cho việc cộng tác qua email.

1991 – NeXTCube là máy chủ web World Wide Web (WWW) đầu tiên được xây dựng trên một thiết bị có tên NextCube. Nó sử dụng hệ điều hành NeXTSTEP, CPU 256MHz và ổ cứng 2GB.

1994 – ProLiant, máy chủ gắn trên giá đỡ đầu tiên của Compaq, ra mắt với dòng sản phẩm ProLiant Series, được trang bị bộ vi xử lý Intel Pentium II Xeon 450 Mhz, 256MB RAM và đầu đĩa CD-ROM 24X.

1998 – Sun Ultra II, máy chủ quan trọng là nền tảng của Google. Đây là máy chủ đầu tiên được sử dụng bởi Google.

2001 – RLX Blade, máy chủ phiến hiện đại đầu tiên dựa trên công nghệ RLX Houston, được tạo ra bởi cựu nhân viên của Compaq Corp. Sau đó, HP mua lại RLX vào năm 2005.

2008 – Cụm máy PS3, máy tính có GPU được phân phối bởi Sony vào năm 2008, bao gồm CPU băng thông rộng di động 3.2GHz, ổ cứng 60GB ATA, RAM 256MB, GPU RSX 550MHz và kết nối mạng tích hợp.

Từ năm 2009 đến nay – Máy chủ đám mây và máy chủ “phi vật chất hóa” đã trở nên phổ biến. Công nghệ ảo hóa đã loại bỏ yêu cầu cụ thể về cấu hình phần cứng cho máy chủ.

Xem thêm: https://thuevpsgiare.vn/may-chu-la-gi/

thuevpsgiare #vpsgiare #fastbyte #vps #thuevps #cloudserver #cloudvps

[regretsretrotech]

The afters.

The mainboard got air blasted and scrubbed to knock loose dust that had accumulated. The CPU fan reminds me of a radiator fan on a car, and that's no accident, it's designed to keep the hot running Pentium 4 cool assisted by a massive extruded aluminum block of a heatsink. Fresh thermal paste and it's locked down. A fresh CR2032 battery for the CMOS/RTC is also installed.

The videocard needed more work than it appeared, the same thing that caused rust spots on the case seemed to have gotten on the card and wouldn't come off, needing it to be scrubbed in warm soapy water and hung up to dry! The GPU fan was cleaned and the heatsink air blasted, fresh paste and it was ready to go in.

The Soundblaster Audigy ZS2 it had unfortunately died and was replaced with a Soundblaster Live 5.1.

Something often lamented with older systems is how much of a pain the ribbon cables are, and they are right. Instead of just tossing the cables in at random and hoping for the best, I go one cable at a time. I fold the cable, and if I have to turn, I fold the cable at 45 degrees, making a crisp corner.

The floppy drive cable only has to connect to one drive so it's got the simplest path, the DVD drive is at the end of it's run, the cable folds and goes up, the opposite for the HDD. It creates a cluster of folded cables at the headers but those can be worked around as you'll see.

The next in is the power supply, this supply doesn't have the detachable cables and as you saw in the befores is an octopus of wiring. I tamed it with zip ties and bundling the cables together, inspired a bit by the wiring found in vastly more complicated machines. If I had lacing twine I would have probably laced the cables up instead, but zip ties work just the same here.

Installed is the fresh air duct and then the system is closed up. The second DVD drive is a place holder, the system doesn't need a second drive and the motherboard does not support SATA, I would need a bridge card with the option ROM installed to boot. (Apparently some SATA bridge cards expect the system to already know how to boot from SATA.) For this machine, UDMA 100 PATA is plenty fast.

Then signs of life POSTING with no OS installed and then finally, a fresh install of Windows XP Pro.

Specs for those that want them.

Motherboard: ASUS P4GE V w/845g chipset AGP/PCI

Processor: Pentium 4 @2.8 Ghz. 533Mhz FSB.

RAM: 2 GB DDR1

Video: ATI Radeon AG3850 w/512MB of VRAM on AGP 8x*

Sound: Creative Soundblaster Live 5.1

HDD: Seagate 160GB Barracuda

PSU: 700w Thermal Take

Case: LiteOn HT 761S

*AGP is weird and a rabbit hole if you fall into it, the board reports both 4x and 8x simultaneously.

Todo:

Games and software

If you have suggestions leave them in the comments

Long Term Todo:

Upgrades

CPU upgrade to K class or 3.2Ghz with 533 FSB. Max RAM to 4GB? SSD? On drive PATA to SATA? I have options here. Creative Soundblaster Audigy ZS2

[sonicenvy]

having a tinfoil hat moment right now. It feels like google specifically is making all of their sites be slower for me on Firefox and Safari.

Like ok, if it was just my mac I might just be like, hmm fair that stuff is a little bit slower because she's 12 years old, but this also happens in Firefox on my brand spanking new gaming PC which has a GPU with 10GB ram, a 3.2GHZ CPU, 16GB RAM and a 1TB PCie SSD, so like, the specs are good and it is brand spanking fucking new (I bought it just a couple of months ago, and use it pretty exclusively for playing the same 3 video games through steam.

Actually, though my oldass mac also has passably decent specs for its age, so idk what gives. (16GB RAM, 1TB SSD, GPU with 1.5 GB RAM, 2.5GHZ processor.)

[mokubetech]

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Specs are Leaked !! Snapdragon 8 Gen 4

We already have some information about the Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 application processor (AP) that Qualcomm plans to announce later this year, most likely in October. It is expected to power the Galaxy S25 Ultra, even though the Galaxy S24 Ultra was just released yesterday. Additionally, the AP will feature Qualcomm's own CPU cores, replacing Arm Holding's Cortex cores.

According to sources, the upcoming Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 (codenamed Tongzi) will not have any low-power efficiency cores. Instead, the mobile chip will have two big high-performance "Phoenix" CPU cores and six medium-performance "Phoenix" CPU cores. chip is expected to achieve 4GHz speeds. Although it is not clear which core will be running at this speed, it is likely to be the two big high-performance Phoenix cores.

It is rumored that the upcoming Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 SoC will feature a clock speed of 4GHz, which is faster than the peak clock speed of 3.3GHz of the Cortex-X4 Prime CPU core. The Adreno 830 GPU is expected to be included in the chipset, which will be built by TSMC using a 3nm process node. According to reports, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 SoC achieved an impressive multi-core Geekbench 6 score of 10628, surpassing the 7249 multi-core score of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3.

Regarding the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset, its configuration consists of a Cortex-X4 Prime CPU core, which can reach up to 3.3GHz, five Cortex-A720 Performance CPU cores that run between 3GHz to 3.2GHz, and two Cortex-A520 Efficiency CPU cores that can reach up to 2.3GHz. In the upcoming Snapdragon 8 Gen 4, a second high-performance core will be added, and the two low-power cores will be replaced with two additional medium-performance cores.

It is being speculated that Qualcomm will divide the production of its Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 between TSMC and Samsung Foundry next year. In 2022, due to poor yields at Samsung Foundry, Qualcomm had to shift the production of Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 to TSMC with minor modifications, and named it Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. Since then, TSMC has been solely responsible for the production of Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, and it is highly likely that they will produce Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 as well.

Samsung Foundry has recently upgraded its yield production capacity. It remains to be seen whether Qualcomm will share some of its Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 business with Samsung Foundry in 2025 or keep it all for TSMC, which is currently the largest contract foundry in the world.

[onedirectdeals]

Dell Alienware A51-5521 Area 51Desktop PC (Intel Core i7 960 3.2GHz,6GB,1TB, DVDRW, Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit)

Price: Buy Now Last Updated: Alienware Area 51; Power Adaptor; System Documentation and CD’s; Keyboard; Mouse; The most Upgradeable Alienware Desktop Ever!Exclusive Alienware ATX industrial designHigh performance graphics options intended for hardcore HD gaming experiencesEquipped with the Active Venting Thermal Management System & High-performance CPU liquid Cooling.Alienware Command Center…

[rwoshop]

Quantum U8L Core i9 RTX 4090 2TB 32GB DDR5 Gaming PC We have a great collection of Gaming PC's in our online shop. Our shop includes other essential Gaming equipment like GPUs, Gaming Chairs, CPUs and much more. Lets improve your gaming experience today with the Quantum U8L Core i9 RTX 4090 2TB 32GB DDR5 Gaming PC. https://www.remoteworkingoffice.com/product/quantum-u8l-core-i9-rtx-4090-2tb-32gb-ddr5-gaming-pc/?feed_id=5288&_unique_id=66c8d68c0aa82 #gaming #gamingpc #fortnite #pcgamer #gamer #cod #callofduty

[mismartphones]

Best mi smartphones

Xiaomi has established a niche for itself in the ever-changing smartphone market by combining cutting-edge innovation with a dedication to affordability. Referred to as “Mi” mobiles, Xiaomi smartphones known for their powerful performance, elegant designs, and user-centric philosophy. This investigation takes us on a tour of the silent characteristics of Xiaomi smartphones and the factors contribute to their enormous appeal.

Best MI Smartphones 2023

Xiaomi 13 

MI 13 Smartphone

The Xiaomi 13 smartphone released on December 11, 2022. The phone has a 6.36-inch touchscreen display . Refresh rate of 120 Hz that can display images up to 1080×2400 pixels (QHD+) at a density of 1900 pixels per inch (ppi). The octa-core Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 CPU, which powers the Xiaomi 13, has three cores clocked at 2GHz, four cores clocked at 2.8GHz, and one core clocked at 3.2GHz. There is 8GB of RAM include. Android 13. Both proprietary fast charging and wireless charging are support by the Xiaomi 13.

[buindia]

Most Powerful Mobile Chipsets Ever: Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

 Source- Business Upside India

These are the top five phones with Qualcomm's Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 CPU, perfect for gamers looking for a powerful gaming companion. This latest processor promises the best performance, combined with the highest visuals and framerates.

Even though you may play leisure games on most phones these days, playing games that are competitive or graphically demanding requires more power. That's the situation with flagship phones. These phones always provide great performance, whether you're getting exact headshots or spinning around quickly in racing games.

Features of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

Improve Speeds of CPU

TSMC uses its 4nm technology to build the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, which is based on the ARMv9 architecture. The chip uses a 1+4+3 configuration instead of a 1+3+4.

One of the four performance cores on the newest Snapdragon chipset is a 3.2GHz Cortex-X3 core. It is expected that the extra core will improve the performance of programmes like games. According to Qualcomm, the most recent chip will provide a 35% improvement over the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1.

Read More