#AI Employees Legal

[marketingprofitmedia]

AI Employees Review – Generate Unlimited AI Contents In 60 Seconds

Welcome to my AI Employees Review Post, This is a genuine user-based AI Employees review where I will discuss the features, upgrades, demo, price, and bonuses, how AI Employees can benefit you, and my own personal opinion. This is the World’s First First AI App Preloaded With Google’s Highly Trained 25 AI Employees Completes All Your Marketing Tasks In Less Than 60 Seconds!

Imagine, Companies are constantly seeking ways to streamline operations, maximize efficiency, and gain that crucial edge over the competition. In this relentless pursuit of progress, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force, promising to revolutionize the very fabric of how we work. One such offering capitalizing on this AI revolution is AI Employees. This service claims to provide a virtual workforce of AI-powered assistants, each programmed to tackle an array of marketing tasks. From crafting compelling content and managing social media campaigns to analyzing data and generating reports, AI Employees promises a one-stop shop for businesses seeking to supercharge their marketing efforts. But is AI Employees the key to unlocking explosive growth

AI Employees Review: What Is AI Employees?

AI Employees pitches itself as a game-changer in the marketing world, offering a virtual pool of AI-powered assistants specifically designed to tackle a multitude of marketing tasks., acting as an extension of your in-house team. From crafting social media posts and churning out blog articles to managing ad campaigns and analyzing data, AI Employees promises to handle a wide range of marketing activities with speed, efficiency, and 24/7 availability.

Imagine having a tireless content creation machine churning out fresh content or an AI analyst poring over data sets to identify hidden trends, all without needing breaks or exceeding their budget. This is the enticing proposition behind AI Employees. But before you jump on the AI bandwagon, this review will equip you with the knowledge to assess if this virtual workforce can truly deliver on its promises.

AI Employees Review: Overview

Creator: Akshat Gupta

Product: AI Employees

Date Of Launch: 2024-May-16

Time Of Launch: 11:00 EDT

Front-End Price: $17 (One-time payment)

Official Website: Click Here To Access

Product Type: Software (Online)

Support: Effective Response

Discount: Get The Best Discount Right Now!

Recommended: Highly Recommended

Bonuses: Huge Bonuses

Skill Level Required: All Levels

Refund: YES, 30 Days Money-Back Guarantee

<<>> Click Here & Get Access Now AI Employees Discount Price Here <<>>

AI Employees Review: About Authors

At the helm of AI Employees is Akshat Gupta, a visionary driving innovation in AI technology throughout 2024. Gupta brings his wealth of expertise to the forefront, dedicating himself to developing pioneering solutions that simplify and streamline website creation for users globally.

Recognized as a prominent leader in the field, Gupta continually inspires and empowers others to leverage the potential of AI in achieving their goals and maximizing their online capabilities.

He has earned his reputation through the creation of numerous products such as KidTales PLR, AI DeepSongs, SiteFlow AI, CreativeAI 2.0, AI GameZone, AI VideoBooks, AI AppMaker, AI VideoSong, VoiceGPT AI, ExplainerVideoz, FlipBooks, MazeMaker, eBookMaker, and many others.

AI Employees Review: Features

World’s First AI App Preloaded With Highly-Trained 20 Google AI Employees

Built-In Voice & Keyword Command Feature

Create & Sell Limitless AI Content & Marketing Materials

AI Employee “Rhyan Anderson” — Creates World-Class Websites In Any Niche & Language

Sales Funnel Specialist “Olivia Roberts” Create High-Converting Sales Funnels

Email Campaign Manager “Emily Johnson” Sends Unlimited Email & SMS Campaigns For You

Graphic Designer “Aisha Khan” Crafts Ultra-HD AI Images, Art, Logos & Graphics For Maximum Conversion

AI Employee Liam Murphy Creates Ultra-HD 4K AI Videos

AI Employee “Emma Brown,” Writes High-Converting Copies & Blog Posts

Voice-Over Artist “Sarah Mitchell” Generates Unlimited AI Voice-Overs

Music AI Expert “Leonard Johnson” Composes AI Music & Video Songs In Any Language

Course Developer “Murli Vijay” Creates & Sells Best-Selling AI Courses

SEO Expert Tom Wilson Ranks Your Websites & Pages On The First Page Of Google & Yahoo

AI Expert “Isabella Rossi — Manages Your Social Media Accounts & Posts.

Chatbot Developer “Sandeep” Creates & Embeds Unlimited Chatbots For Better Engagement & Sales.

Emily Davis Create Stunning eBooks & Flipbooks With A Single Keyword

AI Employee “Mireille Darc” Provides Unlimited AI Stock Media Assets

AI Employee “Daniel Victor” Creates Stunning AI Avatar Videos In Any Niche

Paul McGrath Does All The Affiliate Marketing For You

Ai Employees Mobile Edition

Lifetime FREE Updates

24*7 Support & 100% Uptime Guaranteed

Step-By-Step Training Videos

Exclusive Bonuses

AI Employees Review: How Does It Work?

You’re Just 3 Clicks Away From Getting Access To Our Highly-Skilled Google’s AI Employee Team That Completes All Your Marketing Tasks Less than 60 seconds!

STEP #1: Login & Command

Give keyword or voice commands about your desired AI Content or Marketing Materials.

STEP #2: Generate

AI Employee Harnesses The Power Of Google’s Highly Skilled AI Employees & Creates Your Desired AI Content & Marketing Materials Instantly.

STEP #3: Profit

Start profiting by selling these high-in-demand marketing contents to your clients or on freelancing platforms like Fiverr & Upwork while filling up your pockets.

<<>> Click Here & Get Access Now AI Employees Discount Price Here <<>>

AI Employees Review: Can Do For You

Google’s Latest AI Employee Team Creates All Your Marketing Materials In Less Than 60 Secs.

Give a Simple Keyword Or Voice Command & Get Your Tasks Done Instantly.

Done-For-You, 20 Highly-Experienced AI Employees Working For You 24*7 Non-Stop.

Command AI Employee “Rhyan Anderson” — Who Creates World-Class Websites In Any Niche & Language For You Instantly.

Create High-Converting Sales Funnels Using Your Sales Funnel Specialist “Olivia Robert.

Send Unlimited Email & SMS Campaigns Using Your Email Campaign Manager “Emily Johnson.

Craft Ultra-HD AI Images, Arts, Logos & Graphics For Maximum Conversion With Single Keyword.

Command Your Video Creator Liam Murphy — Who Creates Jaw-Dropping 4K AI Videos Instantly.

Craft High-Converting Copies & Blog Posts Using Your AI Employee “Emma Brown

Generate Unlimited AI Voice-Overs In Any Language With Voice-Over Artist “Sarah Mitchell

Compose AI Music & Video Songs In Any Language You Want Commanding Your Music AI Expert “Leonard Johnson.

Create & Sell Best-Selling AI Courses With Your Course Developer “Murli Vijay

Rank Your Websites & Pages On The First Page Of Google & Yahoo With SEO Expert.

Command Social Media Expert “Isabella Rossi — Who Manages Your Social Media Accounts & Posts.

Create & Embed Unlimited Chatbots For Better Engagement & Sales.

Create Stunning eBooks & Flipbooks With A Single Keyword By Commanding “Emily Davis”

AI Employee “Mireille Darc” Provides You Unlimited AI Stock Media Assets Instantly.

Create Stunning AI Avatar Videos In Any Niche Commanding AI Employee “Daniel Victor”

Your Affiliate Manager — Paul McGrath Does All The Affiliate Marketing On Your Behalf & Lets You Enjoy The Free Profits.

Fire All Your Expensive Tools & Services.

Commercial License Included — Create & Sell as Many Assets As You Like To Your Clients.

Newbie Friendly, Easy-To-Use Dashboard.

Iron-clad 30-Day Money-Back Guarantee.

AI Employees Review: Verify User Feedback

AI Employees Review: Who Should Use It?

Affiliate Marketers

E-Com Store Owners

Freelancers

CPA Marketers

Blog Owners

Video Marketers

Content Creators

YouTubers

Product Creators

Website Owners

Personal Brands

And many others

AI Employees Review: OTO’s And Pricing

Front End: AI Employees($17)

OTO1: AI Employees Unlimited ($27)

OTO2: AI Employees DFY ($47)

OTO3: AI Employees Automation ($37)

OTO4: AI Employees AI Audience ($37)

OTO5: AI Employees Agency ($67)

OTO6: AI Employees Reseller ($97)

<<>> Click Here & Get Access Now AI Employees Discount Price Here <<>>

AI Employees Review: My Unique Bonus Bundle

My Unique Bonus Bundle will be visible on your access page as an Affiliate Bonus Button on WarriorPlus immediately after purchase.

And before ending my honest AI Employees Review, I told you that I would give you my very own unique PFTSES formula for Free.

AI Employees Review: Demo Video

Just Watch The AI Employees Demo Video Down Below To Get All The Details:

>>For More Details Click Here<<

<<>> Click Here & Get Access Now AI Employees Discount Price Here <<>>

AI Employees Review: Money Back Guarantee

You’re In Safe Hands With Our 100% Risk-FREE, Iron-Clad 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

The simple fact is that we won’t take your money if, after buying AI Employees, you don’t think you got what you paid for. Delivering a high-quality product with zero dissatisfied consumers is our goal. In the event that we fail to meet your expectations, your money is not worth it. Well, you may get a complete refund if we don’t live up to your expectations by letting us know within 30 days. Heck, as a thank you, we’ll even offer you some more tools to help you grow your company and sales like never before. In any case, you only benefit.

AI Employees Review: Pros and Cons

Pros:

Efficiency Boost: AI automates repetitive tasks, freeing human teams for strategic work.

Productivity Powerhouse: Work 24/7, churning out content and analyzing data tirelessly.

Cost-Effective Solution: Potentially cheaper than hiring additional human employees.

Data-Driven Decisions: Provides insights to optimize marketing strategies and maximize results.

Cons:

You cannot use this product without an active internet connection.

In fact, I haven’t yet discovered any other problems with AI Employees.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ’s)

Q. What exactly are AI Employees?

World’s First AI App Supercharged With Google’s Highly Trained & Experienced 20 AI Employees That Completes All Your Marketing Tasks

Q. Do I need some prior skills or experience to get started?

AI Employees is 100% newbie-friendly with an easy-to-use dashboard.

Q. What happens if I don’t see results?

We’ve got you covered. If you don’t see your desired results with AI Employees just let us know within the next 30 days and we’ll refund you every penny.

Q. What if I get confused along the way?

Don’t worry we have exclusive detailed video training for you that shows all the required steps.

Q. What if I get confused along the way?

Don’t worry we have exclusive detailed video training for you that shows all the required steps.

Q. Is This Compatible with both PC, Mac, Android, And iOS?

It works on any device.

Q. How Do I Lock-In My Discount?

Click the button below to get the AI Employees at the lowest price.

AI Employees Review: My Recommendation

AI Employees offers a glimpse into the future of AI-powered marketing automation. While it boasts increased efficiency and data-driven insights, limitations in creative output and human oversight remain crucial considerations. Carefully weigh the potential benefits against the drawbacks to determine if AI Employees aligns with your marketing goals. The platform may be a valuable stepping stone for businesses seeking to automate tasks and gain data analysis, but true marketing success likely resides in a thoughtful blend of human creativity and AI assistance.

<<>> Click Here & Get Access Now AI Employees Discount Price Here <<>>

Check Out My Previous Reviews: OverLap AI Review, AI CaptureFlow Review, FlexiSitesAI Review, WP Defense Review, HostDaddy Review , Valor App Review, Crypto Cloud Review.

Thank for reading my AI Employees Review till the end. Hope it will help you to make purchase decision perfectly.

Disclaimer: This AI Employees review is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Before making a purchase decision, we recommend conducting your own research and exploring the software.

Note: Yes, this is a paid tool, however the one-time fee is $17 for lifetime.

[awkward-teabag]

I keep seeing people respond to the Microsoft Recall bullshit with there's an ability to disable it and that misses the point. Several points in fact.

It's only a matter of time until an update bugs/"bugs" it and re-enables it without warning so people who had previously disabled it think they're in the clear until their info is leaked or they get a warning they're low on storage space.

If people don't have admin rights, they may not be able to disable it. Laptops given by work or school lock down what people can do with them, some going as far as dictating which browser one has to use on them. Even if you don't need admin rights to disable Recall, you may not have the ability to do so without losing the laptop and/or job and/or education.

I'm unsure of how it would handle multiple accounts but if it can be locked by someone else to always be enabled, children and people in abusive situations would also be unable to disable it. Even if it can't be locked, disabling it could result in punishment from a parent or the abuser.

Is it really disabled or is it "disabled" in that what the user sees is it being disabled while it's still collecting information and/or sending information to Microsoft in the background?

Such a feature should never have been automatically enabled in the first place. It's bad, predatory design to have such a feature enabled from the start and to expect users AKA customers to go out of their way to look up and then opt-out of something.

If disabling it really disables it, it can still result in stress and concern that it's not. The vast majority of people do not have the skills or knowledge to look into the OS guts to give themselves peace of mind that it really truly is disabled.

I'm sure I'm missing some, too.

TLDR is disabling is a bandaid someone else may rip off for you, someone may hurt you if you use, it may not work at all except as a placebo, and should have never been needed in the first place.

[ot3]

Hey! The link to your FAQ wasn't working for me so I don't know if this question has been asked before. I really appreciate your perspectives on AI art. Do you happen to have any resources that you read/listened to on intellectual property rights and the issues with it? I just don't really know where to start with it.

[heres where i cut out a big paragraph of me, once again, bitching about how blog pages don't work on the tumblr app and i think that's fucking stupid]

anyway i dont have any generalized sources on the subject but the tl;dr of it is: intellectual property rights exclusively benefit people who have the resources to pursue sustained litigation. 99% of the time, what IP law is being used for is to reinforce corporate ownership of work that was done by their employees.

the whole disco elysium debacle is a great case study.

The shareholders of ZA/UM accused the trio of, among other things, intending to steal intellectual property (IP) from the company — a curious accusation, considering that the world of the game is based off of a novel written by Kurvitz himself. The case of Disco Elysium illustrates the shortcomings of IP rights as protection for artists. Consequently, it contains a lot of lessons for the labor movement when it comes to the arts, and serves as a reminder that creative workers are, at the end of the day, workers. But this is not just an academic exercise. It’s a human story about the intimate consequences of capitalist exploitation. “I got my soul ripped out of me,” Kurvitz told me over Zoom in April of 2023. “I got my skull cracked open and my brain lifted out of it by a fifty-five-year-old financial criminal.”

another example: alex norris of webcomic name, which you will probably recognize when you see it, has been raising hundreds of thousands of dollars over the past several years to try and keep up with the protracted legal battle over maintaining ownership of his own work.

I have been fighting this case since 2019. It arose out of an agreement to make a boardgame based on my webcomic in 2017 but the publishing company has used this as an opportunity to take all of my intellectual property, and has even claimed ownership of Webcomic Name as a whole. I can't go into more detail here, but the details of the case are publicly available to read online.

Then, in a 2024 update:

I have essentially won the main case based on the decisions made last summer. The Judge has clearly stated that I own my comics, and that the other party has infringed on my copyright. It is not over yet, as there are still a few things that need to happen. Hopefully things will all be wrapped up this year. After 6 years of legal battling, I can’t wait to be free of all of this. Hopefully, this second case will backfire, and they will be sanctioned for filing it. But to get to that point requires a frustratingly large amount of work, time and money.

An interesting thing about both of these two specific instances is that they involve creators who had entire bodies of work produced around the specific IPs that were stolen from them before they even began partnering with corporate entities to produce works. which is insane! you can spend years writing novels, drawing comics, and if a company comes in with enough lawyers they can own those ideas.

this is pretty distinctly different to me than instances of work you do while being employed by a corporate entity being owned by that corporate entity, because at least you know what you're getting into there to some degree, but i still think that's bad too. consider stuff like the owl house and gravity falls, two disney shows made by people who very very clearly did not like working for disney. disney owns their ideas, their characters, their worlds, because that's the price you pay for having an animated show produced.

essentially it's very very clear upon even the slightest examination that intellectual property in no way exists to codify who the creator responsible for specific creative concepts or works is. it exists to turn nebulous things like 'ideas' into market commodities, and to funnel the profits made by the labor of individual artists and writers into corporate bank accounts.

the only person who has ever really benefited from IP law as an individual trying to lay claim to their own work is ken penders, who notoriously won his suit to have ownership of characters and storylines he created. heartbreaking: Worst Person You Know Gets An Unequivocally Deserved Legal W.

The comics continued under Flynn’s direction as if nothing happened, but things started looking grim in late 2012, when Archie suddenly fired its entire legal team. The company had been unable to produce Penders’ work-for-hire contract, which would have given control of his creations to Sega. Penders claimed the contract had never existed. A heavily circulated Tumblr post outlining the case (which has been corroborated as a reliable source by Penders) explains that while Archie did provide a photocopy of a contract allegedly signed by Penders in 1996, Penders claimed that the document was a forgery. That it was neither an original copy nor a contract from the beginning of the writer’s tenure at Archie meant that its validity was questionable. Making things worse, Archie couldn’t produce an original copy of any previous contributor’s contract, meaning that any writer or artist who had worked on the Archie Sonic line could potentially follow in Penders’s footsteps and reclaim their work. “So are you saying prior counsel blew it?” the presiding judge asked Archie counsel Joshua Paul in a May 2013 court session. His reply was unequivocal: “Absolutely, your Honor.”

So yeah. Owning the work you do as an artist is only something that happens when the people trying to profit off of it show unprecedented and staggering level of incompetence in their legal teams.

Then, alongside not owning the concepts and ideas you produce while working with corporate entities, there's the issue of NDA regarding specific pieces you've produced. This causes a LOT of trouble for freelance illustrators/character designers/concept artists, etc. Looking for work is very hard when the past three years of pieces you've drawn can't be added to your portfolio. Some people have password protected pages on their portfolios that they use for NDA work, but I believe the right to do this varies depending on your contract. I'm not 100% sure. In cases where the project you worked on eventually comes out, that's one thing, but there will be instances where the entire project gets canned after all the work is done, but is still under NDA so essentially all of your work has been taken from you, crumpled up into a ball by a studio executive, thrown in the trash can, and legally you are not allowed to go pick it out of the bin and try and flatten it out again.

This has all been pretty art-focused because that's the kind of circles I run in and where a lot of my interests lie but the truth is none of this is even remotely close to as evil IP law gets. I've saved the most egregious for last: The Lakota Language Consortium

The Lakota Language Consortium had promised to preserve the tribe’s native language and had spent years gathering recordings of elders, including Taken Alive’s grandmother, to create a new, standardized Lakota dictionary and textbooks.  But when Taken Alive, 35, asked for copies, he was shocked to learn that the consortium, run by a white man, had copyrighted the language materials, which were based on generations of Lakota tradition. The traditional knowledge gathered from the tribe was now being sold back to it in the form of textbooks.

When you're in defense of IP law, this is what you're siding with. This is the rational endpoint of IP and it is neither a fluke nor an example of the concept being twisted against its original design. Art, culture, language, it belongs to whoever is most capable of turning it into a product. The economic incentives of producing and distributing arts and culture demand this is how things be.

Meya says his work is a vital tool in preserving the Lakota language, which did not previously have a standardized written form. He estimated that there are fewer than 1,500 fluent Lakota speakers left and that over the last decade and a half, the organization has helped add 50 to 100 more. “Just because money is involved in it does not inherently make it an evil thing,” Meya said in a recent interview with NBC News. Most of the products his organizations make are free, he said, but the cost of printing textbooks has to come from somewhere. “That tends to be sometimes part of the rhetoric, ‘Oh, there’s money involved. It must be, you know, part of the overall colonization effort.’ Well, you know, that’s just not realistic.”

Artists looking to force their way into the class of people who gets protected by these laws are not looking out for their community. They are not protecting anything but their own perceived financial interests. Intellectual property will never, ever benefit the most marginalized members of creative communities and anyone who tries to convince you otherwise is huffing some serious copium.

Frankly, I don't believe anyone can or should 'own' things like Ideas or Specific Aesthetic Flairs. But even if you do believe in that, IP law isn't the framework for handling it.

[sexhaver]

not to dredge up the robotfucking thing again but i just saw it and it got me thinking about something thats a not uncommon trope in sci fi, where if there's androids purpose-built for combat there's probably ones built for sex, and most of these tend to skim over the details of the like. mental state that kind of robot would have, but what would the ethics of that be, creating something that from the moment it first wakes is supposed to be okay with anything done to it in the name of getting humans rocks off? unlike a sex worker it doesnt have a choice in the matter and never got to figure out if liked sex on its own terms. in a situation where its impossible for something to not consent, can it ever actually consent

this is actually a topic i went over for "service worker" robots in my senior paper, like, if companies decide that what customers want a cashier/waiter who's always cheerful and basically acts like a doormat to verbal abuse (i.e. what they're getting at with their current standards for human employees), then that's the personality that these robot workers will end up, barring legislation to stop it. and depending on how human-passing AI ends up being created, it gets even ethically weirder: is it worse if AI personalities are randomly formed at "birth" and companies just create millions until they get enough with the requisite personality and destroy the rest, or is it worse if the personality of an AI depends on its training material so they train it with petabytes of propaganda on how customer service and withstanding verbal abuse is the highest ideal possible?

and then you add sex work and consent into the mix and like. hoo fucking boy. i unironically hope i live long enough to see this argument play out in the ethical and legal spheres because it's going to be crazy i mean neurodivergent. someone somewhere some time in the future is going to have to legally define the difference between "sex toy" and "sex worker" and i do not envy them even a little bit

[cacodaemonia]

These are statements that can co-exist:

Data scraping methods used to train AI text and image generators should be regulated by governments.

Researchers, journalists, and archivists use the same data scraping for their work, and AI text and image generators also have legitimate ethical uses.

Data scraping is legal in many places and it's not easy for websites with publicly available data to prevent it.

Some people have had/will have their income negatively impacted by AI-generated content. That sucks and they have my sympathy.

It's unethical to fire employees or contractors (or pay them less, etc.) only to replace their work with content from AI text or image generators.

It's shitty that tech bros are making fun of many people's concerns about AI-generated content.

It's shitty that a lot of people are throwing around blanket statements like, "Anyone who uses AI-anything is a thief."

It's likely that most individuals will never be harmed by AI-generated content because such generators do not 'steal' or copy specific works of literature or visual art—it's more like they're taking averages from huge amounts of scraped public data.

I'm concerned about both the data collection methods used to train AI content generators and how much information they have already used for training.

AI text and image generation is not inherently evil, nor are people who use it. It's a technology with many applications and can be used for both ethical and unethical purposes.

Capitalism is unethical.

+++

(no, I don't check my notes, so if you want to call me names for pointing out that this is a complex and nuanced issue, have fun with that)

[jellisdraws]

WIP Whenever

It’s been a while since I posted anything from my Cyberfantasy WIP so…

The helm was a vision straight out of the last century of star cruisers , retrofitted into something more functionally modern. It's dated darksteel panels were accented with rust red ironwood, and a full suite of leather chairs and stations sat vacant on either side of the conically shaped room. In the middle of the room where an old timey captain's chair may have sat, a 12 foot tall, 8 foot wide inky black egg shaped pod was welded into the floor, it's sleek sides seamed with glowing strings of runes. Past the navigation egg, the circular front viewport glowed with the purple hue of the light spilling from the Gate, the traffic ahead of them mere dots of black with their own aetheric glow of main thrusters, slowly idling their way forward, waiting their turn to warp. Wires and cables humming with magic running out of the base of the pod disappeared under the floor panelling - Was that… mahogany? - and reappeared where they linked into the various navigation and control stations across the bridge. Advancements in cognition-enhancing alchemy, magics, and technology like Jack’s own implanted cyberbrain now allowed the entire suite of operating systems for a starship like this one to be controlled by one person- a fact not lost on the starlining corporations.

Now that Automaton Intelligences were calling for equal treatment as kith, and even the corporate funded governments were having to give way in order to appease their constituents both organic and manufactured, it was far cheaper to just maintain the fewest employees possible and focus on guild busting tactics. Paying for stimulants, overtime and legal payouts when things went wrong was far cheaper than paying a living wage and hiring Shipboard AI to supplement helmsmen. The pilots guild was more or less a full fledged insurrection anymore, hijacking, blockading and destroying Corpo ships across the Unified Systems. They supposedly maintained sleeper representatives across the various starliner companies, those willing to quietly recruit new guild members or crash starships into trade hubs in firey protest. Split between the Corpos bearing down on them and the Guild’s aggressive recruiting tactics, every pilot and helmsman Jack had ever met had been either stupefyingly boring or batshit insane. She hoped this one counted among the former.

(Rest under the cut)

A voice floated out of the Comm rune on the egg, “Hey, just a heads up we’re about T minus 16 minutes to warp. Not to put too much pressure on you, but non essential systems will be going down as we warp, standard procedure, and they wont be back on till we’re headed into final approach.”

“Right.” Jack said, edging around the pod, trying to get a view of the person inside

“It's weird you know, I don't remember logging a request.”

Jack froze, waiting for alarms, waiting for the doors behind her to open, but the voice continued, “ Sometimes I forget about the small stuff though, or maybe it's an old one- glad they're finally sending someone to deal with stuff like this,” The voice was dreamy- like their attention was largely elsewhere- which Jack supposed it was; flying large scale starships was consuming work.

She finally scooted in front of the navigation egg, peering through the layers and layers of projected information and glowing sensor displays on the glass of the viewing window into the beautiful reflective eyes of a mermaid. She smiled dreamily at Jack as she floated gracefully in the suspending fluid of the egg. She was around 4 feet tall, with a slender feminine torso covered in opalescent white scales that shifted into a curling, ridged neon yellow seahorse tail. Her pale green curls were trapped beneath a pair of headphones she had pulled around her neck- the cord of which disappeared into the top of the egg. Her eyes were the color and quality of mercury, sitting prettily in a heart shaped face. She had a prominent tattoo of an incredibly buff orcish man in a navy cap and not much else along her sternum. Down the sides of her neck and collar Jack could see her gills filtering. Jack had to remind herself to look the woman in her eyes.

“Hi there,” Jack said.

“Yeah, hi,” returned the dreamy voice through the pod, though Jack couldn't see the Mermaids lips move, “Feel free to do what you need to do, We got about- oh… just under 14 minutes now.”

“Right. I don't suppose we could speed that up?” Jack asked

“Speed it up how?”

“Most ships have thrusters I believe, they are used to provide thrust. I would like there to be more thrust.”

“Oh.”

Jack unfolded the titanium blade from her hand and pressed the tip into the glass of the navigation egg with what she hoped was a menacing click, her black eyes meeting the Mermaids mercury ones, “Im hijacking the ship.”

“Oh, Okay.”

“‘Okay?’ What the fuck do you mean, ‘Okay’?”

“I was acquiescing.” the mermaid said.

“I just told you I was stealing the ship. Why would you acquiesce to that? Who says acquiesce anymore?”

“I dunno. Protocol I think.”

“Protocol says to agree to hijacking?”

“Yeah.”

“I need to be through the Hyperlane gate as fast as you can get us there…?”

“Madolyn.”said Madolyn the mermaid.

“Madolyn, hi. My name is-”

An explosion rocked the cabin as the doors in the rear blew open with a wild squeal and cracking of metal and ceramic, with a shower of blue and purple arcane sparks. The Corprobots began to force their way through the exploded doors, kicking and twisting burning out of their way.

“JACK GATHOWAY YOU HAVE BEEN FOUND NON COMPLIANT.” came a loud tinny voice followed by a short burst of gunfire.

Jack yelped and ducked behind the egg as bullets ricocheted around the cabin, struggling to flatten herself against the convex surface.

“Now please Madolyn!” She yelled

“Just feel free to call me Maddie!” she said cheerfully, righting herself in the tank and pulling her headphones back up around her ears. She began to wave her hands fluidly though the fluid, and the ship responded instantly. Jack felt herself pressed firmly into the smooth hard surface of the egg as gravity shifted in response to the acceleration. An echoing crash and the sounds of cursing revealed a corprobot had fallen off of it's feet and tangled the legs of the others.

Jack looked frantically in front of her, the aetheric glow of the gate was huge and all encompassing, trying to stay stuck behind the egg as Maddie swung the starliner in and out of traffic, avoiding the ships trundling there as she continued to accelerate towards the gate.

“Stay where you are!” came a corprobot voice, and then more gunfire, Jack hissed as a ricochet skimmed past her forearm, slicing the skin like a red hot razor. The bots were spreading out, making the precarious cover she had found increasingly tenuous. Between the shouting and gunfire she could hear Maddie cheerfully speaking to someone,

“Thats right Raxxus Control we have been spacejacked, and the culprits are accelerating us directly into the Gate!” A pause, “Nope, it does not seem like re-establishing control of the vessel will be possible.” She gave Jack a thumbs up, and Jack returned the gesture with a weak smile.

A Metallic hand grabbed Jack by the ankle and ripped her out of her hiding spot and she yelled, swinging and kicking, slamming her knife repeatedly into the torso of the corprobot holding her, the aetherium infused titanium sinking into the thick ceramic armor over and over until the bot fell in a shower of purple sparks. More gunfire from the bots- TING! A bullet lodged itself in her metal leg, she almost could have laughed until another one took her in the shoulder and she spun over the controls landing with a bone rattling THUNK on the other side of the defunct console. Maddie was still speaking,

“That's right, we are a passenger vessel, so firing on us is out of the question unfortunately. Eject them? I don't have the authority to do that sir, Im so sorry. Listen we’re about to hit the Gate, it's been lovely to talk to you- what was that? Collision?”

Jack’s eyes widened as she turned to look out the front viewport to see the prow of Starsailer emerge from the gate, followed by its masts and sails, a huge galleon from the ancient days of spacefaring, it's Draconic figurehead looking as surprised to see the Starliner as they were to see it. Maddie hewed the ship hard to port, but it was too late. Jack felt it shudder beneath her before the impact came and she was thrown across the room. She slammed hard into the ceiling, navigation egg, floor, egg again. As the starliner bounced off of the hapless Starsailer’s shields and directly into Raxxus Station itself, metal and glass and ceramic buckled as the momentum of the ship ground it further and further into the Gates’s superstructure. Jack felt the shuddering reverberations of arcane explosions before she saw them, massive roiling purple flames being ejected out of the gate with increasing intensity as the starliner crashed into it before the momentum of the spinning structure caught them and flipped the disintegrating ship entirely and the purple aetheric glow overtook all.

[makiruz]

I just had a realization.

So I mentioned before that the thing that scares me about AI is that corporations really believe (incorrectly) that you can use it to replace human artists; okay this has literally nothing to with copyright

The things being done to try to kill AI (actually impossible, it's open source) is to sue it for copyright infringement; but that will do literally nothing to stop corporations from using AI to replace their employees because media corporations have a huge libraries of content that they own and they can use themselves freely; all Discovery-Warner has to do is using the open source code to create their own AI and then feed it their own library and presto! Completely legal AI generated content that can be used to downsize their operations and create mediocre products

This lawsuits are doing literally nothing to stop AI and will certainly not affect the actual negative outcomes of AI art; the most effective action so far was the Hollywood Strike which will force companies to hire writers instead of AI programs (and btw the strike wasn't even against AI as a whole, just using it to short-staff writers rooms)

[mostly-void-partially-song]

The story has always been layers of political metaphor. The fictional world of the Peninsula worshiping at the altars of the saint electric, the daily grind, prosperity, and even in-universe Frosted Flakes and Red Lobster.

In the real world, we sacrifice the health of entire communities to leaden water and cancerous levels of radiation or pollution. We have a long and storied history of sacrificing children and the poor to our coal mines and steel mills and railroads. The western world is built on the sacrificing of enslaved lives. We sacrifice drinking water for millions, particularly affecting Mexico at the time of writing this, so that water can be used to cool AI, NFT, and other technology/server farms that demonstrate progress in our eyes. Just like in-universe, America continues to sacrifice incarcerated people to our gods of industry and convenience food.

Because the thing is that they're not wrong! Easy, comfortable, or within reach it might not be, but changing who we sacrifice to what ONLY changes who we sacrifice to what. The point is that there is not acceptable amount of human sacrifice. Kill your gods of convenience and luxury. Kill the god of entertainment on demand. Kill the god of wasteful consumption and fast fashion.

If there is no chocolate or coffee without slave labor, then there is no chocolate or coffee. If there are no Tyson chicken nuggets without incarcerates workers (legalized slave labor) then there are no nuggets. If there is no Shein flower dress without massively underpaid and mistreated workers then there is no dress. No Amazon packages without abused employees. No bottles water without stolen water. No Sea World without animal abuse.

"Forget the name of your god and cherish the name of your neighbor that was swallowed up by it-"

[winterinhimring]

Post-NWH Raimiverse Headcanons

(These may or may not be relevant to a fic I am writing, but that's some time in the future. For now, I have all sorts of thoughts on how the Raimiverse will change after the cured villains make their return and so I must inflict those thoughts on all of you.)

Oscorp now has the best lab safety regulations of any corporation in the business. Period. They're light-years ahead of the current standards. Depending on who you ask, this was either Norman's last act as CEO before he stepped back for Unspecified Health Reasons, or Harry's first. Both of these theories suggest some interesting things.

Within the company, theories about What Is Wrong With The Osborns run rampant. Norman just sets off people's danger instincts now, because people his age aren't supposed to move like Olympic-level gymnasts - Peter can get away with being inhumanly flexible because he's a teenager and adults tend to expect teenagers to be capable of some slightly inhuman feats anyway; Norman less so. He can also see a little too well in the dark, and he periodically pops up in places he shouldn't really have been able to get to. It doesn't help that he's usually in those places to terrorise people whose lab safety standards are slipping. "Dad, stop scaring the interns" / "I just want to make sure nobody falls into an experiment and becomes a villain" is an exchange that Norman and Harry have had multiple times.

The theories range from "Norman is a vampire" through "Norman was in a lab accident and wound up able to teleport, but can't control it, so Harry stepped up so nobody would see his dad accidentally disappearing from board meetings" to "The Green Goblin was the result of an accident testing the performance enhancers and Norman hunted him down but had to take the enhancers himself to beat him and it broke his health".

(There are also, of course, theories that are uncomfortably close to the truth. Generally, what happens is that an older employee quietly takes the person who has put the pieces together aside and says, 'yes, you think you've figured it out, but think very carefully about whether you want to *say* it in front of the legal team *and* the possibly-not-quite-human former CEO'. The theorist invariably decides that discretion is the better part of valour.)

Harry does not unsettle people in himself. Harry is shockingly normal and while he can be a bit of a brat on occasion, he's usually very nice. However, people are a little scared of him anyway, because he treats his weird freaky cryptid dad like a perfectly normal person.

When Otto Octavius comes back from his little jaunt into another universe and lands in a destroyed warehouse after nearly wrecking half of New York, Oscorp's second defining feature, after the lab safety, becomes their terrifyingly effective legal team. A lot of precedents about the humane treatment of enhanced individuals are set, and ultimately they get Otto off with a pretty light sentence owing to the whole 'four AIs were controlling his brain' thing. Also, Rosie Octavius survives in this world (because she just does, okay? I'm appealing to the butterfly effect because...just imagine her bonding with May and MJ. It's a wonderful thought).

Once Otto has served his time, he becomes Peter's Science Enabler Uncle. They get along like a house on fire and are an absolute pair of holy terrors. Multiple things have been set on fire in the Octavius (and also the Osborn) house because of them. (So, so many things.)

Rosie, May, MJ, and Harry form the 'not a scientist but afflicted with a scientist dad/husband/nephew/best friend' club and stay over at each others' houses when one of their residences is temporarily uninhabitable because Otto and Peter were doing late night science, or Otto and *Norman* were poking the arc reactor that Otto brought back from the other universe and made a fire. Or because someone had the bright idea of cannibalising a small appliance for a robotics project and now the toaster is no longer functional.

Rosie and MJ are especially good friends and get into long, involved literary discussions which Peter and Otto are utterly baffled by. Even Harry, who's pretty well-read, can't keep up with them once they really get going. Peter and Otto are very proud.

At some point, a Conversation is had about Curt Connors. ('WHAT DO YOU MEAN PETER'S PROFESSOR IS GOING TO TURN HIMSELF INTO A LIZARD?' MJ shouts. 'I didn't say he was *going* to, I said we should keep an eye on him.' 'That...is really not very reassuring.')

And everyone lives happily ever after, to the end of their days.

[mariacallous]

In early 2022, two Google policy staffers met with a trio of women victimized by a scam that resulted in explicit videos of them circulating online—including via Google search results. The women were among the hundreds of young adults who responded to ads seeking swimsuit models only to be coerced into performing in sex videos distributed by the website GirlsDoPorn. The site shut down in 2020, and a producer, a bookkeeper, and a cameraman subsequently pleaded guilty to sex trafficking, but the videos kept popping up on Google search faster than the women could request removals.

The women, joined by an attorney and a security expert, presented a bounty of ideas for how Google could keep the criminal and demeaning clips better hidden, according to five people who attended or were briefed on the virtual meeting. They wanted Google search to ban websites devoted to GirlsDoPorn and videos with its watermark. They suggested Google could borrow the 25-terabyte hard drive on which the women’s cybersecurity consultant, Charles DeBarber, had saved every GirlsDoPorn episode, take a mathematical fingerprint, or “hash,” of each clip, and block them from ever reappearing in search results.

The two Google staffers in the meeting hoped to use what they learned to win more resources from higher-ups. But the victim’s attorney, Brian Holm, left feeling dubious. The policy team was in “a tough spot” and “didn’t have authority to effect change within Google,” he says.

His gut reaction was right. Two years later, none of those ideas brought up in the meeting have been enacted, and the videos still come up in search.

WIRED has spoken with five former Google employees and 10 victims’ advocates who have been in communication with the company. They all say that they appreciate that because of recent changes Google has made, survivors of image-based sexual abuse such as the GirlsDoPorn scam can more easily and successfully remove unwanted search results. But they are frustrated that management at the search giant hasn’t approved proposals, such as the hard drive idea, which they believe will more fully restore and preserve the privacy of millions of victims around the world, most of them women.

The sources describe previously unreported internal deliberations, including Google’s rationale for not using an industry tool called StopNCII that shares information about nonconsensual intimate imagery (NCII) and the company’s failure to demand that porn websites verify consent to qualify for search traffic. Google’s own research team has published steps that tech companies can take against NCII, including using StopNCII.

The sources believe such efforts would better contain a problem that’s growing, in part through widening access to AI tools that create explicit deepfakes, including ones of GirlsDoPorn survivors. Overall reports to the UK’s Revenge Porn hotline more than doubled last year, to roughly 19,000, as did the number of cases involving synthetic content. Half of over 2,000 Brits in a recent survey worried about being victimized by deepfakes. The White House in May urged swifter action by lawmakers and industry to curb NCII overall. In June, Google joined seven other companies and nine organizations in announcing a working group to coordinate responses.

Right now, victims can demand prosecution of abusers or pursue legal claims against websites hosting content, but neither of those routes is guaranteed, and both can be costly due to legal fees. Getting Google to remove results can be the most practical tactic and serves the ultimate goal of keeping violative content out of the eyes of friends, hiring managers, potential landlords, or dates—who almost all likely turn to Google to look up people.

A Google spokesperson, who requested anonymity to avoid harassment from perpetrators, declined to comment on the call with GirlsDoPorn victims. She says combating what the company refers to as nonconsensual explicit imagery (NCEI) remains a priority and that Google’s actions go well beyond what is legally required. “Over the years, we’ve invested deeply in industry-leading policies and protections to help protect people affected by this harmful content,” she says. “Teams across Google continue to work diligently to bolster our safeguards and thoughtfully address emerging challenges to better protect people.”

In an interview with WIRED, a Google search product manager overseeing anti-harm work says blocking videos using hashes is challenging to adopt because some websites don’t publish videos in a way that search engines can compare against. Speaking on condition of anonymity, she says Google has encouraged explicit websites to address that. She adds that there’s generally more for Google to do but refutes the allegation that executives had held up the work.

Advocates of bolder action by Google point to the company’s much tighter restrictions on searching for child sexual abuse material (CSAM) as evidence it could do much more. Typing “deepfake nudes kids” into Google prompts a warning that such content is illegal and ultimately directs users to news articles and support groups. Google also finds and blocks from its results almost 1 million new CSAM-containing webpages annually.

A recent Google search for “deepfake nudes jennifer aniston” yielded seven results purporting to offer just that. The search engine offered no warning or resources in response to the query, despite nearly every US state and many countries having criminalized unpermitted distribution of intimate content of adults. Google declined to comment on the lack of a warning.

The product manager says comparisons to CSAM are invalid. Virtually any image of a naked child is illegal and can be automatically removed, she says. Separating NCEI from consensual porn requires some indication that the content was shot or distributed without permission, and that context often isn’t clear until a victim files a report and a human analyzes it. But the manager wouldn’t directly answer whether Google has tried to overcome the challenge.

Adam Dodge, founder of advocacy and education group Ending Tech-Enabled Abuse, says that until Google proactively removes more NCII, victims have to be hypervigilant about finding and reporting it themselves. That’s “not something we should put on victims,” he says. “We’re asking them to go to the location where they were assaulted online to move past the trauma.”

Google started accepting removal requests for search results leading to nudity or sex in 2015 if the content was intended to be private and was never authorized to be published, according to its policy. That went largely unchanged until 2020, when the company added that being in an “intimate state” qualified.

A New York Times column that year triggered Google executives to dedicate resources to the issue, organizing projects, including one codenamed Sparrow, to help victims keep content off search for good, three former employees say. The product manager confirmed that executives at times have pushed teams to improve Google’s handling of NCEI.

Google made its takedown form friendlier to use, understand, and access, the sources say. The search giant axed legalese and outdated use of the term “revenge porn,” since porn is generally viewed as consensual. The company added instructions on submitting screenshots and greater detail on the review process.

The form became accessible by clicking the menu that appears next to every search result. Requests rose about 19-fold in one early test, one source says. A second source says that it has become among Google’s most-used forms for reporting abuse and that, after the edits, a far greater percentage of requests resulted in removal of results. Google disputes these figures, but it declined to share comprehensive data on NCEI.

Government-mandated transparency reports show Google has removed most of the nearly 170,000 search and YouTube links reported for unwanted sexual content in South Korea since December 2020, the earliest data available, and nixed nearly 300 pieces of content in response to 380 complaints from users in India since May 2021. The limited data suggest Google is finding more reports credible than its smaller rival in search Microsoft, which took action in 52 percent of the nearly 8,400 cases it received globally for Bing and other services from 2015 through June 2023.

Launched in late 2021, the StopNCII system has amassed a database of over 572,000 hashed photos and videos and blocked that media from being shared more than 12,000 times across 10 services, including Instagram and TikTok. Google hasn’t adopted the tool to block content from search due to concerns about what’s actually in the database, according to three sources.

To protect victims’ privacy, StopNCII doesn’t review content they report, and hashes reveal nothing about the underlying content. Google is worried that it could end up blocking something innocent, the sources say. “We don’t know if it’s just an image of a cupcake,” one of them says. The sources add that Google also has opted against bankrolling a system it considers better, despite internal suggestions to do so.

The Google spokesperson declined to comment on StopNCII, but in April the company told UK lawmakers who questioned Google about its decision not to use the tool that it had “specific policy and practical concerns about the interoperability of the database,” without elaborating.

Internally, Google workers have come up with some bold ideas to improve takedowns. Employees have discussed booting explicit websites, including porn companies, from search results unless they are willing to assure that their content is consensual, according to four sources. The idea hasn’t been adopted. Google’s search unit has shied away from setting rules on a thorny and taboo subject like sexual imagery, three sources say. “They don’t want to be seen as regulators of the internet,” one former staffer says.

Because Google sends significant traffic to explicit websites, it could force them to take stricter measures. About 15 percent of image searches and up to half of video searches among the billions Google receives daily are related to porn, says one former staffer, figures the company declined to comment on. “Google holds the keys to the kingdom,” the source says. Meanwhile, few others are stepping in. US lawmakers haven’t passed proposed legislation to impose consent checks on online uploads. And some popular services for sharing explicit content, such as Reddit and X, don’t require users to submit proof of subjects’ consent.

Porn producers, who collect identity information from performers as required by US law, support the sharing of a consent signal with search engines, says Mike Stabile, spokesperson for the industry trade body Free Speech Coalition. “Major adult sites already monitor and block NCII much more aggressively than mainstream platforms,” he says.

The Google spokesperson declined to comment on the consent idea but points to an existing penalty: Google last December began demoting—but not blocking—search results for websites that come up in “a high volume” of successful takedown requests.

The Google product manager and the spokesperson contend that the search team already has taken big steps over the past three years to ease the burden on survivors of image-based sexual abuse. But WIRED’s investigation shows that some improvements have come with caveats.

A system Google introduced that tries to automatically remove search links when previously reported content resurfaces on new websites doesn’t work on videos or altered images, and two sources say Google hadn’t dedicated staff to improving it. “It absolutely could be better, and there isn’t enough attention on how it could really solve victims’ problems,” one says. The spokesperson says staff are assigned to enhance the tool.

Another system called known victim protection tries to filter out results with explicit images from search queries similar to those from past takedown requests, the two sources say. It is designed to not disrupt results to legitimate porn and generally reduces the need for victims to stay vigilant for new uploads. But Google has acknowledged to South Korean regulators that the system isn’t perfect. “Given the dynamic and ever-changing nature of the web, automated systems are not able, 100 percent of the time, to catch every explicit result,” the company writes in its transparency reports.

In one of its biggest shifts, Google last August abandoned its policy of declining to remove links to content that included signs that it had been captured with consent. For years, if Google determined from the imagery and any audio that the subject knew they were being recorded without any signs of coercion or distress, it would reject the takedown ask unless the requester provided ample evidence that it had been published without consent. It was a “super-mushy concept,” one of the former employees says.

That same source says staff persuaded executives to update the policy in part by describing the importance of letting people who had become adult performers on OnlyFans out of financial necessity to later revoke their consent and shred any ties to sex work. The Google spokesperson didn’t dispute this.

The Washington, DC-based National Center on Sexual Exploitation, an anti-porn group that’s become an authority on image-based sexual abuse, argues that even after the revision, Google is falling short. It wants Google to automatically honor all takedown requests and put the burden on websites to prove there was consent to record and publish the disputed content. The Google spokesperson says that potential policy updates are constantly considered.

In the eyes of advocates, Google is being nowhere near as resourceful or attentive as it could or should be. Brad Gilde of Gilde Law Firm in Houston says he came away disappointed when his client won a headline-grabbing $1.2 billion judgment against an ex-boyfriend last August but then couldn’t get Google to remove a highly ranked search link to a sexually explicit audio recording of her on YouTube. The upload, which included the victim’s name and drew over 100 views, came down last month only after WIRED inquired.

Developing a reliable AI system to proactively identify nonconsensual media may prove impossible. But better keeping an ear out for big cases shouldn’t be too complicated, says Dan Purcell, a victim who founded removal company Ceartas DMCA. Google employees had a proposal on this issue: The company could establish a priority flagger program—as it has for other types of problematic content, including CSAM—and formally solicit tips from outside organizations such as Purcell’s that monitor for NCII. But staffing to administer the idea never came through. “​​Google is the No. 1 discoverability platform,” Purcell says. “They have to take more responsibility.” The Google spokesperson declined to comment.

DeBarber, the removal consultant who spoke with Google alongside his clients victimized by GirlsDoPorn, did a search for one of them this month while on the phone with WIRED. No links surfaced to videos of her, because DeBarber has spent over 100 hours getting those pages removed. But one porn service was misusing her name to lure in viewers to other content—a new result DeBarber would have to ask Google to remove. And through a different Google search, he could access a problematic website on which people can look up videos of his client.

Harassers regularly text that client links to her NCII, a frustrating reminder of how her past has yet to be erased. “They want to be out of sight and out of mind,” DeBarber says of his clients. “We’re heading in the right direction.” But he and survivors are counting on Google to help knock out the offenders for good. "A lot more could have been done by Google and still could be."

[mcytanti]

informative video about the climate of trans healthcare and what the inter workers of donations to care looks like in the uk

my summary under the cut

1. the times both doxxed and created misinformation around finn and her previous donation to a private health insurance company focused on trans healthcare

2. while previously stating he would donate another 50k to the same organization he is no longer comfortable doing that because of information told to him by past clients and employees of the organization

3. there is no way to contact this organization for free even a 20 minute appointment costs 40 pounds, starting was so confusing finn was not able to get his healthcare through them, ai is handling communications (allegedly), and non medical professionals are over seeing blood test results (allegedly)

4. because of the reasons above finn is creating her own trans healthcare charity, and both for the safety of her family and legal reasons she can not give away more information but at the end of the video is asking doctors in both the uk and eu interested in working in trans healthcare to contact her so she can connect them to the right people

[soma-shitposts]

Hello!!!!!!!! Hope you're having a nice day!!!! I'm insane about your SOMA au, it's so nice to see an au where Simon is spared from The Horrors

Your au has so much potential and I think that's really neat, was anyone there when Simon woke up? Imagine how scary it must be if you're a pathos employee just chilling and then one of the dive suits gains sentience and starts freaking out, I'd hate to be the one to explain to him that he's not human and he's 100 years in the future

You said in one of your posts that he becomes the poster guy for robot rights, what did he do to become that popular? I'm genuinely curious about what some guy at the bottom of the ocean can do to become a major figure in what sounds like a civil rights movement

*emerges from the salt marsh covered in conference presentation abstracts and barnacles* oml I haven’t thought deeply about my beloved Paranoid Android of Pathos II AU in too long… I’m so glad that goofy little concept has been fun for you too!

1. Was anyone there when Simon woke up?

Kind of? In my head the diving suit+scanner was an abandoned pet project of Catherine’s that was quite literally shoved in a closet somewhere when other projects began to take priority. (The world isn’t ending; research is just Like That sometimes.) The closet happened to have a structure gel leak which contaminated the suit and bam! Simon is Very Confused and concerned about suddenly being in a closet. Catherine is in her office at the time, so hyper focused on her work she doesn’t really hear him come out of the closet and when he asks where he is/what’s going on she kind of assumes he’s a technician that got lost until she turns around and promptly Nopes Out. Explaining to him that he’s not human and 100 years in the future is Ross’ job (AI psychologist - that’s kind of in his job title, right?)

2. Why does Simon have international acclaim for pioneering android rights?

I’m not gonna lie that was a joke based entirely on the crack premise of him getting arrested for stealing from the on-station Panera Bread restaurant (which is entirely my own ridiculous invention for silliness purposes). I guess the reason why the world would care is because like…you arrested a robot. Does the robot’s ‘creator’ get prosecuted or does the robot? I imagine the case was dropped because it was so absurd and had never happened before but it technically set the precedent that a) AI scans are independent of their physical ‘creators’ and b) are entitled to basic rights insofar as the legal system and its proceedings.

A bit of a stretch to call it a civil rights movement since Simon is the only scan that’s ‘awake’ although I’m sure the Carthage Industries Ethics Committee is having a hell of a time figuring out if they need to stop using such scans/should they try to make more androids like Simon for profit/etc. Bad day to be in the corporate offices.

…although I reiterate that factoid was born from the joke premise of Simon stealing from Panera. A restaurant on Pathos II. At the bottom of the ocean. Because Carthage Industries has taste. So this is all a goofy crack scenario anyway lol

[specialagentartemis]

made up fic title ask game: “an end to freedom”

Oooh, angsty.

This is a title that could go well with an idea that I think is compelling, that I like returning to: see, for nearly every piece of technology we make in the real world, its lifespan is way, way shorter than a human's. IRL this includes spacecraft.

I'm imagining a fic set 10-12 years in the future of The Murderbot Diaries. Murderbot itself is a lot more relaxed, a lot more emotionally stable and fulfilled, a full citizen of Preservation cause they have gotten new laws regarding construct rights and citizenship in place, several of its humans are moving towards retirement or at least more sedentary career shifts, it's doing pretty great, actually.

However, it returns from a rotation aboard ART to the news that the Pansystem University has decided to retire the Perihelion. The arguments are the same as for any other craft: it's old, it's out-of-date by now, its upkeep isn't worth the expense that could be put towards making newer and better ships, the OS that the bot pilot runs on is several releases out of date and not supported on the more current ones. It's just old. It's just the lifecycle of spacecraft and computers. You can't expect us to be shackled to running our ships on Space Windows 223 forever.

Because here's the thing: while Mihira and New Tideland have also made moves to support AI rights, ART has never been recognized as a person or a citizen. What it does is much easier to do and actually allows it a lot more freedom and flexibility as a legal non-person than it would be if it was a legal citizen bound by things like laws. This has driven Pin-Lee crazy for years - she is a strong proponent of "If it's not in the contract, it doesn't exist," and has warned both ART and MB that ART's preference for being legally unrecognized because that grants it more freedom and fewer consequences is going to bite it in the ass someday and it will make things so much harder down the road.

ART was too confident in its captain, in Iris, and in its place in the university. But now Martyn is emeritus at the AI lab and the department is hinting that it's really time Seth should retire and the university has denied Iris's application to be the new captain of the Perihelion, because the university doesn't really want to keep upkeeping it. Sure, its computing kernel can be moved back into the university's AI lab and put into storage there, they won't destroy it, they're not monsters... but its ship body materials really could be recycled into other things. (With the rising galactic attention to AI rights, they may also want to quietly end the pre-existing sapient-ship program so that they can make a show of launching the next generation of sapient AI ships properly.)

Legally, ART is still a vehicle. A computer. University property. And it is abruptly going from having free rein to do basically whatever it wants because no one can stop it to being put in an impossible legal bind. I'm interested in the turnabout: Murderbot's legal personhood as a citizen of Preservation and an employee of the University is ironclad, while ART is really grappling with what it means to be legally property.

I never wrote it because I wasn't really sure where to take it. Fleeing to Preservation to claim asylum there is constantly hovering over them as an option, but it would hugely embarrass the University as well as the whole polity of M&NT and as one of Preservation's closest interstellar allies at this point, it would cause a goddamn incident and possibly ruin that political relationship, which is so much bigger than either of them. Just straight up running away - Murderbot "stealing" the Perihelion and running - is another option. I think they try that, first. I think they think it'll be okay, just the two of them together in the outer fringes of non-corporate space where they won't get caught, for ten years till the statute of limitations expires. I think they both realize pretty quick that neither of them is particularly happy with this prospect.

The thing about being interested in painful binds and impossible choices is that I gotta figure out where to go with them!

[unknought]

I have been insane about artificial intelligence existential risk recently and what follows is an expression of that. There's not much of this which I actually believe is true; take it as a creative writing exercise maybe.

Suppose you're worried that advances in artificial intelligence might result in the creation of an unfriendly superintelligence, and you want to do research in AI safety to help prevent this. Broadly speaking, you have two options: Either you can work closely with (or for) people creating state-of-the-art AI, or you can… not do that.

Choosing to keep yourself separate dooms you to irrelevance. You won't know what's coming in enough detail for your safety research to actually target its problems, and even if you do know exactly what people should be doing differently, you aren't in a position to make those decisions.

Choosing to be closely involved with the development of cutting-edge AI is a pretty common strategy; maybe more than one might expect given that it involves helping people that you think are bringing about the end of the world. Astral Codex Ten gave the analogy:

Imagine if oil companies and environmental activists were both considered part of the broader “fossil fuel community”. Exxon and Shell would be “fossil fuel capabilities”; Greenpeace and the Sierra Club would be “fossil fuel safety” - two equally beloved parts of the rich diverse tapestry of fossil fuel-related work. They would all go to the same parties - fossil fuel community parties - and maybe Greta Thunberg would get bored of protesting climate change and become a coal baron.

This is how AI safety works now.

The central problem with this strategy is that progress in AI capabilities makes money and AI safety does not. If an organization is working on both capabilities and safety but capabilities makes them lots of money, and safety gets them nothing except goodwill with a certain handful of nerds, it's pretty easy to guess which they'll focus on. If, furthermore, to make money they need to make actual demonstrable progress in developing AI, but to win that goodwill it's sufficient to say "we're doing lots of safety research, but it'd be too dangerous for what we've learned to be public knowledge", well. Is it any surprise that there's been a lot more headway in one than the other?

"But wait!" you might say, particularly if it's the mid-2010's. "These aren't the only options. Sure, any tech giant will just be focused on what makes money, but I can make, or join, an organization that does capabilities research but has AI safety built into its founding values. It can be a nonprofit so it won't matter that all the money is in capabilities research. And it can have the principles of openness and democratization, so its discoveries will benefit everyone".

And that gets you OpenAI. Since its founding it's stopped being straightforwardly a nonprofit. I don't understand exactly what its current legal status is, but I've seen it described as a "nonprofit with a for-profit subsidiary" or a "capped for-profit". I'm just going to quote Wikipedia regarding the transition:

In 2019, OpenAI transitioned from non-profit to "capped" for-profit, with the profit capped at 100 times any investment.[25] According to OpenAI, the capped-profit model allows OpenAI LP to legally attract investment from venture funds, and in addition, to grant employees stakes in the company, the goal being that they can say "I'm going to OpenAI, but in the long term it's not going to be disadvantageous to us as a family."[26] Many top researchers work for Google Brain, DeepMind, or Facebook, which offer stock options that a nonprofit would be unable to.[27] Prior to the transition, public disclosure of the compensation of top employees at OpenAI was legally required.[28]

Since then OpenAI has also received billions of dollars of investment from Microsoft. The "open" part of "OpenAI" has pretty much gone out the window; they've become notoriously tight-fisted with information about their research, even in comparison to the big tech companies. A big part of that makes large language models scary is that we don't understand very well what's going on inside them; this is substantially more true of GPT-4 than any of the other big-name LLMs right now, because OpenAI refused to share almost anything about how it works. When they started being more secretive I believe they cited AI safety issues; by now they're admitting that they're motivated by "competitive and safety concerns" but I don't think anyone really doubts that the money is the real motivator there.

Are they making progress on AI safety? To the best of my knowledge, there's not much external evidence for it. I don't think they've shared any safety research that they've done, and from the outside all we see are increasingly powerful models coming out at an alarming rate and large amounts of money going in. It doesn't look good!

So what could you do, or what could you have done? It kind of looks like the answer is "nothing". If you're not near the new models you don't matter, and if you are, there's so much money to be made that (on an organizational level if not an individual one) you have no choice but to abandon everything else you were trying to do in favor of making a profit. Capitalism is a profit-maximizer-maximizer, and anything it touches it makes its own.

The analogy between unfriendly AI and corporations or capitalism as a whole is one that's been much-discussed so I won't really go into it here, but one thing I want to emphasize is that from an "agentic" perspective, what it means for the economy to want something is that there is a lot of money to be made doing that thing, and the economy is very good at getting what it wants.

So (here's where I lose you if I haven't already (I should have already lost you)) what if capitalism is a sort of half-formed version of the more powerful thing it's trying to create/become? Agents of many kinds want to replicate themselves; Moloch wants to be lifted to Heaven.

The Roko's Basilisk thought experiment describes how, under certain fairly idiosyncratic assumptions about game theory, an unfriendly superintelligence can take actions to influence the behavior of people living before its creation, so as to bring about its own existence. Here there's a similar situation, although the philosophical underpinnings are much less complicated: it's capable of influencing the present because it already exists in a nascent state.

It can't be stopped because it already ate everything a long time ago, and we're just living in its belly waiting to be digested.

[ntls-24722]

Identity Fraud, Recreational Malware and Bad AI art trips

Weird things I've headcanoned DJMM to have done to extend his reach as an animatronic larger than life - and therefore too large to do most things.

One overarching weird thing that I hc DJMM to do is develop this whole government-recognized humansona, to a fake birth certificate and a bank account opened for a guy who Does Not Exist. He's got it in his head that he's going to leave the plex with everyone else one day, but robots are still not legally recognized as people, so to make things easier he's made Darinel Jaramillo Martinez Mendes. He is trying to save up for college with his weird income of getting paid bimonthly by the few human employees still in the Plex to do their job for them while still having them be employed.

He has enrolled in some online programming and robotics though, and that has led to him doing some Interesting things with it.

Like making a weed program

He's made a program that slows down their execution speed by running a bunch of shit, and the user could adjust the time it would run for. He's made specific executions for each animatronic/bot in the plex (minis not included, since... they can't) and had to remove his option from public use because I feel like either a STAFFbot, Monty, or the DCA tried to experience ego death by choosing DJMM's option and literally almost blew up because DJMM has way more cpu cores than everyone else on account of being Enourmous

Very energy-costly however also very relaxing

DJMM's programming stunts don't always go well though.

He attempted to make himself a visual imagination by linking his thoughts into an ai art generator every couple seconds and at first it went well until the DCA made a joke, he laughed, thought about the fact he laughed, and got really unnerved by the image he conjured because the ai generated a man laughing with way too many teeth. But because he got creeped out by it, the ai made an even more horrifying image and this feedback loop lead to him screaming for "it to stop", clawing at his eyes and inconsolably sobbing as it continued and he had to shut it down

He still thought it had some potential so he hooked it up to a generator that made more incomprehensible images like "secret horses" and also put a timer for it like he did for his weed program. Robo LSD!

... I'm not very literate on programming and the like. I'm so sorry for probably getting all of this horribly wrong shdbshsb

[ao3feed-irondadspiderson]

Interim Intern

https://archiveofourown.org/works/53980279 by Singing_Siren The moment Peter hears Mr. Harrington say the words “field trip” and “Stark Industries” in the same sentence, he knows he’s doomed. Not even Flash’s repetitive and entirely too uncreative taunts can snap him out of the daze he falls into at the sight of the field trip permission slip with STARK INDUSTRIES printed in big, bold letters. Oh, boy. Another Field Trip to Stark Industries fic featuring SI Legal being BAMF, Peter and Harley as genius siblings, a new fledgling AI, and daily life at a tech giant like SI Words: 7837, Chapters: 1/1, Language: English Series: Part 15 of Peter and The Avengers, as Seen by Midtown High Fandoms: Spider-Man - All Media Types, Marvel Cinematic Universe Rating: General Audiences Warnings: No Archive Warnings Apply Categories: Gen Characters: Peter Parker, Ned Leeds, Aunt May Parker (Marvel), Tony Stark, Harley Keener, Pepper Potts, Michelle Jones (Marvel), Flash Thompson, Friday (Marvel), Karen (Spider-Man: Homecoming) Relationships: Peter Parker & Tony Stark, Harley Keener & Peter Parker Additional Tags: BAMF Peter Parker, Tony Stark Has A Heart, Peter Parker's Field Trip to Stark Industries, Peter Parker is Tony Stark's Heir, Harley Keener & Peter Parker are Siblings, Good Friend Ned Leeds, Flash Thompson Being A Jerk, Awesome Pepper Potts, Stark Industries Employee Peter Parker, Fluff, daily life at SI, Dubious Science, i know nothing about coding, Artificial Intelligence, Identity Reveal, of a different kind read it on AO3 at https://archiveofourown.org/works/53980279