#Arizona employment attorney

[coochiequeens]

I'm usually opposed to the death penalty but this guy should face a firing squad.

By Anna Slatz December 5, 2023

CONTENT NOTICE: This article contains a graphic description of child sexual abuse involving an infant. Reader discretion is appreciated.

A trans-identified male in McCracken County, Kentucky is facing charges of child sexual abuse after reportedly molesting a baby in his care. Maria Childres, 25, had been employed as a daycare worker in Paducah, Kentucky when the abuse is said to have occurred.

Childres was arrested in February of this year after the Department of Community Based Services (DCBS) received an anonymous tip detailing an alleged incident of abuse that had occurred in November of 2022. The tip, reportedly written by one of Childres’ co-workers, accused him of making inappropriate comments towards an infant while changing the child’s diaper, and touching the baby inappropriately.

Maria Childres. Photo Source: FACEBOOK

Following the receipt of the DCBS report, Paducah Police went down to Explore Learning Academy, Childres’ place of employment, to investigate. They spoke with a witness who corroborated the details of the anonymous report, and spoke with the director of the Academy, who appeared to have been aware of Childers’ behavior with the baby. Despite knowing what had occurred, the director had only given him a “write up.”

Reduxx has obtained the citation from the Paducah Police Department detailing the complaint, in which Childres is referred to using “she/her” pronouns despite his legal sex being male.

According to the citation, Childres was confronted by another co-worker while he was changing the infant, who was concerned he was hurting her while wiping her genital area.

In response, Childres reportedly said “that was her clit area and she likes it. It just made her day.”

The witness police spoke with also stated that she saw Childres rub the baby’s vaginal area with his fingers while making the sickening remark.

Courtesy Paducah Police Department.

After being taken to the police station for questioning, Childres initially claimed he had not changed the infant’s diaper at all. He later admitted to having done so after an officer presented him with evidence in the form of a text that he had sent to the daycare’s director confirming the baby’s diaper had been changed.

Childres maintained that he had not made inappropriate comments or touched the baby sexually, and that he “often says things that are taken out of context.”

Childres was charged with first-degree sexual abuse of a victim under the age of 12, and has been housed in the McCracken County Jail since. There has been some confusion over the spelling of his last name, with the courts, police, and his social feeds having different spellings alternating between “Childers” and “Childres.” The Kentucky Court of Justice has the name spelled “Childres.”

According to his now-delated Facebook, Childres claims to have studied child development at The University of Arizona Global Campus, an online college which has come under accreditation concerns in recent years. A separate Facebook account also belonging to Childres has his gender listed as “female.”

After speaking with a clerk at the McCracken County Court of Justice, Reduxx has confirmed that Childres has privately retained a prominent transgender lawyer to defend him during upcoming hearings.

Leach holding the transgender pride flag.

Madison Leach, a male who began identifying as a “woman” six years ago, was the first openly transgender candidate to seek public office in western Kentucky when he ran as a Democrat for the Calloway County attorney seat. Leach recently decided to leave Kentucky over Senate Bill 150, which would make it optional for public school teachers to use a student’s preferred pronouns.

“This is kind of the cherry on top for me. The quality of life in New York is going to be better for me, and I think that a lot of parents of trans youth or other trans people are debating this in their head,” Leach said in March, stating that he was intending to eventually move his practice to New York.

Childres is scheduled for a pretrial conference this week, at which point he and Leach will enter a plea or negotiate a potential resolution with the prosecutors.

[offender42085]

Post 1030

Richard Sepolio, California inmate, born 1992, incarceration intake in May 2019 at age 26, released November 2020

DUI Manslaughter, DUI causing injury

In November 2020, a 28-year-old former inmate, who was released in early after serving less than three years (including jail and prison confinements) of a nearly 10-year sentence, partially because of the COVID pandemic. Sepolio also received a reduced sentence for good behavior and for working in a prison fire camp.

He was involved in a DUI crash on October 15, 2016, a crash that killed Annamarie Contreras, 50, and Cruz Contreras, 52, a married couple from Chandler, Arizona; and Hacienda Heights residents Andre Banks, 49, and Francine Jimenez, 46.

When it was announced Sepolio would be released, San Diego County District Attorney, Summer Stephan said, “This very early release is unconscionable''.

Stephan further stated, "Department of Corrections decision is re-victimizing the family and friends of the four people killed and seven injured who have been devastated by their loss and continue to deal with the financial, emotional, mental and physical trauma caused by the defendant. This inmate continues to deny and minimize the crime by refusing to admit he was speeding and denying being impaired while arguing with his girlfriend on the phone, which resulted in the devastating crash.''

In addition to having drinks prior to getting behind the wheel, Sepolio was arguing with his girlfriend on the phone just moments before losing control of his truck on the bridge, the prosecutor said.

Sepolio testified he was driving on the transition ramp -- a route back to Coronado that he had driven more than 90 times before -- when he sped up to merge in front of another car and lost control.

Prosecutors said he was driving between 81 and 87 mph when the crash occurred.  His truck plunged over the Coronado Bridge in October 2016. It dropped about 60 feet onto crowded Chicano Park. 

In May 2023, the inmate petitioned the court. He sought to have his parole terminated early and his convictions for vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated and DUI causing injury erased through a new law that allows inmate firefighters an expedited path to purging their criminal records.

The law, which went into effect in 2023, aims to provide a smoother path for formerly incarcerated volunteer firefighters to obtain employment. Inmates released from custody can now apply for such relief if they successfully complete fire camp and judges can grant those requests if the expungement is found to be “in the interest of justice.”

While now discharged from the Navy, he elected to wear his Navy Uniform in his court proceeding.

This was his second attempt after the first attempt was denied earlier by the court. The second petition was denied.

3g

Last reviewed August 2024

[partisan-by-default]

If these third parties & candidates are so far to the "left of liberal," why do they only exist because of GOP support?

"Mitchell’s case is the latest example of dubious tactics used in an effort to qualify West, a[n allegedly] left-wing academic, for the ballot in states across the U.S. It’s also among the more egregious. It’s an effort that West himself apparently knows nothing about.

...

Rothgeb, who could not be reached for comment, is a registered Republican, as are two other electors for West, voting records show. Two additional electors listed in the state filings are not registered to vote at the addresses provided for them, records show.

...

[Mitchell and her husband] soured on West’s candidacy when they read that Republican-aligned operatives were working to get him on the ballot to play spoiler.

"We weren’t for the Republican griminess, so we stopped pushing him," she said.

Her former employer, a signature gathering contractor called Wells Marketing, a mysterious Missouri limited liability company, is leading the effort to get West on the ballot in Arizona.

On Monday, the Associated Press (AP) reported that several Republican-connected lawyers sought to recover an effort to get West on the 2024 presidential election ballot in Arizona.

As the deadline to submit paperwork approached, two prominent Republican lawyers in the state and a GOP attorney working on West's ballot efforts learned that two would-be electors—Jerry Judie and Denisha Mitchell—were no longer interested in serving.

This prompted a flurry of text messages and phone calls to salvage the effort. When that failed, two Republican lawyers visited Judie's and Mitchell's homes, seemingly to persuade them to reconsider, the AP wrote.

[interestinginfographics]

Arizona DUI Lawyer [INFOGRAPHIC]

Beyond the criminal penalties, a DUI can also have other long-term consequences. It can affect your insurance rates, making it more expensive to insure your vehicle. It can also impact your employment, as many employers do not want to hire someone with a DUI on their record. A DUI can also damage your reputation and relationships with friends and family. Our job as Arizona DUI attorneys at Genesis DUI & Criminal Defense Lawyers in Arizona is to hold the State accountable and make them prove beyond a reasonable doubt that their claims against you are true. Many DUI cases are won and lost on technicalities, often revolving around how evidence against you is gathered and handled. Consequently, you must contact us as soon as possible so we can put together an appropriate plan of action depending on the facts of your particular case.

Source: Arizona DUI Lawyer

[pashterlengkap]

At last night’s Republican presidential debate, former Vice President Mike Pence said, “We’re going to pass a federal ban on transgender chemical or surgical surgery anywhere in the country.” LGBTQ Nation contacted his campaign asking if he intended to outlaw gender-affirming care for all people, regardless of age. His campaign hadn’t responded by the time of publication. While Pence’s comment also mentioned “protecting” kids from “radical gender ideology,” his response caught the attention of Alejandra Caraballo, a civil rights attorney and clinical instructor at the Harvard Law School Cyberlaw Clinic. Caraballo posted a video of Pence’s comment on Wednesday night and wrote via Twitter, “They’re going to ban care for trans adults too. It was never about protecting kids.” Related: LGBTQ+ group reveals national effort to “eliminate” queer people from public life Bans on drag and gender-affirming care are just the start… “While most anti-transgender healthcare bills in recent years focus on minors, anti-LGBTQ forces ultimately seek to ban all forms of transition-related care, regardless of age,” a recently released report by the Movement Advancement Project (MAP), an organization that tracks policies on LGBTQ+ issues and voting, stated. Get the Daily Brief The news you care about, reported on by the people who care about you: Subscribe to our Newsletter “They are pursuing this goal in a variety of ways,” the report added, “including: defining ‘minor’ to include at least some adults; by banning state funds from covering this medical care (e.g., in Medicaid, state employee health plans, and for those in incarceration); explicitly allowing private insurers to refuse to cover this care; and more.” They're going to ban care for trans adults too. It was never about protecting kids. https://t.co/aqXjDEfhj4— Alejandra Caraballo (@Esqueer_) September 28, 2023 Three in 10 bills introduced in state legislatures during 2023 sought to ban or restrict medical care for both transgender children and at least some transgender adults, MAP noted. This included bills re-defining a “minor” as including adults up to ages 19, 21, or 26. One in seven bills included provisions that either banned private insurers from covering transition-related medical care, or explicitly allowed them to refuse coverage for such care, regardless of age. At least nine states explicitly ban Medicaid coverage of trans-related health care, regardless of age. Medicaid is a state health insurance program for low-income individuals. These states include Arizona, Florida, Kentucky, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas. “These provisions knowingly and intentionally seek to cut off access to this medically necessary care,” MAP wrote. “Without insurance coverage, most forms of health care, including transgender-related health care, are unaffordable to the average person. This is especially true for transgender people, who experience far higher rates of poverty and employment insecurity due to discrimination.” Movement Advancement Project A graph showing the increase in legislation targeting gender-affirming care for transgender adults Various right-wing politicians have described trans identity as a “delusion” and a “mental illness.” Far-right Daily Wire host Michael Knowles called for eradicating “transgenderism” during this year’s Conservative Political Action Conference. Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy and House Republicans have expressed opposition to making bathrooms, workplaces, and the military more inclusive of trans adults. Other state legislation has also sought to erase trans adults from public life by increasing the difficulty of obtaining accurate identity documents that accurately reflect trans adults’ correct gender identity, banning trans people from using public bathrooms matching their gender identity, and rolling back other existing nondiscrimination protections for transgender people through new or expanded religious exemptions, MAP noted. http://dlvr.it/SwkjSb

[allmyblogs]

A Comprehensive Guide to Finding the Right Lawyer in Arizona

Arizona, a state known for its stunning landscapes and vibrant culture, also boasts a diverse and skilled legal community. Whether you're facing a personal legal issue, navigating a complex business dispute, or seeking guidance through a real estate transaction, finding the right lawyer in Arizona is crucial. This blog post will explore the various types of lawyers available in the state, highlight key considerations when selecting legal representation, and provide insights into how lawyers in Arizona system functions.

Types of Lawyers in Arizona

Criminal Defense Lawyers: Criminal defense lawyers in Arizona defend individuals accused of criminal offenses. From misdemeanors to serious felonies, these attorneys work to protect their clients' rights and ensure a fair trial. They are skilled in negotiating plea deals, representing clients in court, and advocating for reduced sentences.

Family Law Attorneys: Family law attorneys handle cases related to divorce, child custody, spousal support, and other family-related issues. They provide essential support during emotionally charged situations, guiding clients through legal processes such as divorce settlements and child custody arrangements.

Personal Injury Lawyers: Personal injury lawyers represent clients who have been injured due to accidents or negligence. They help victims seek compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Whether it's a car accident, a slip and fall, or a product liability case, personal injury lawyers are dedicated to achieving justice for their clients.

Real Estate Lawyers: Arizona real estate lawyers assist with transactions involving property purchases, sales, and disputes. They review contracts, handle title issues, and ensure that all legal aspects of a real estate transaction are properly managed. Their expertise is invaluable in preventing legal complications and ensuring smooth property transactions.

Business Lawyers: Business lawyers focus on legal issues affecting businesses, including contract disputes, mergers and acquisitions, and employment law. They provide legal guidance to help companies navigate regulatory requirements, draft contracts, and resolve commercial disputes.

Estate Planning Attorneys: Estate planning attorneys help individuals prepare for the distribution of their assets after death. They create wills, trusts, and other estate planning documents to ensure that a person's wishes are carried out and that their estate is managed according to their desires.

Key Considerations When Choosing a Lawyer in Arizona

Specialization: It's essential to choose a lawyer who specializes in law relevant to your case. Specialized attorneys have the expertise and experience to handle specific legal issues effectively.

Experience: Look for a lawyer with a proven track record in handling cases similar to yours. An experienced attorney will be familiar with the nuances of Arizona's legal system and can offer valuable insights into the likely outcomes of your case.

Reputation: Research the lawyer's reputation by reading client reviews, checking their professional standing, and seeking recommendations from trusted sources. A lawyer with a strong reputation will likely provide quality legal representation.

Communication: Effective communication is crucial in a legal relationship. Choose a responsive lawyer responsive lawyer who listens to your concerns and keeps you informed about the progress of your case.

Fees: Understand the lawyer's fee structure before engaging their services. Some lawyers work on a contingency fee basis, while others charge hourly or flat fees. Make sure you are clear about the costs involved and any additional expenses that may arise.

Navigating the Legal System in Arizona

Arizona's legal system is governed by state and federal laws, with the Arizona Supreme Court serving as the highest court in the state. Understanding the legal process and knowing what to expect can make navigating legal issues less daunting.

Filing a Lawsuit: If you need to file a lawsuit, your lawyer will guide you through the process, including drafting and filing the complaint, serving the defendant, and preparing for court proceedings.

Legal Representation: Having a skilled attorney by your side ensures that your rights are protected and you receive competent representation throughout the legal process.

Alternative Dispute Resolution: In some cases, alternative dispute resolution methods such as mediation or arbitration can effectively resolve legal disputes without going to court. Your lawyer can advise you on whether these options suit your case.

Finding the right lawyer in Arizona can significantly impact the outcome of your legal matter. By understanding the various types of lawyers available and considering key factors such as specialization, experience, and communication, you can make an informed decision when seeking legal representation. Arizona's legal professionals are dedicated to providing exceptional service and ensuring that your legal needs are met with the highest expertise and care.

[bllsbailey]

Jim Jordan Subpoenas Progressive Political Campaigning Company That Employs Judge Merchan’s Daughter

Jim Jordan, the Ohio Republican who chairs the House Judiciary Committee, has issued a subpoena seeking additional information about the political work of the daughter of New York State Supreme Court Judge Juan Merchan, who is overseeing Donald Trump’s case.

Jordan accused Michael Nellis, a former senior advisor to Kamala Harris and founder of the company Authentic Campaigns, of disobeying House investigators’ requests for any and all documents pertaining to the prosecution of Trump in a letter addressed to him.

His company has handled political work for prominent Democrat clients like Vice President Kamala Harris, President Joe Biden, Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs, and U.S. Rep. Adam Schiff. It provides general consulting, online fundraising, digital paid media, mobile messaging, creative content, and logo and branding for political campaigns and politicians.

Loren Merchan, the daughter of the judge handling Trump's case, is now president of Authentic Campaigns, a consulting company that has fundraised over $250 million for progressive campaigns. Its clients include Kamala Harris, the Biden-Harris campaign, and Gavin Newsom. pic.twitter.com/08zGmZYrOX— Mia Cathell (@MiaCathell) April 4, 2023

Jordan said in his letter on Wednesday that Nellis had turned down that request as well as one more later in the month.

“As such, the Committee is left with no choice but to resort to compulsory process,” Jordan wrote. “Popularly elected prosecutors, such as Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, have engaged in an unprecedented abuse of authority by prosecuting a former President of the United States and current nominee for that office. Of relevance to the Committee’s oversight is the impartiality of Judge Juan Merchan, the presiding trial judge, due to his refusal to recuse himself from the case in light of his apparent conflicts of interest and biases. “One such conflict is Ms. Merchan’s — daughter of Judge Merchan and President of Authentic Campaigns — work on behalf of President Trump’s political adversaries and the possible financial benefit that Ms. Merchan and Authentic Campaigns received from the prosecution and conviction of President Trump.”

According to Jordan, he received public reports indicating that Loren Merchan and Nellis were “closely involved in the presidential campaigns of both President Biden and Vice President Harris.”

“During Ms. Merchan’s employment with the Harris campaign, Authentic Campaigns received over $7 million in compensation for its services. You also worked for then-presidential candidate Harris, and it appears you continue to do so. Authentic Campaigns conducted work for the 2020 Biden-Harris campaign and, according to public records, was paid just over $2 million in a one-month period for its work,” he continued.

Compared to Jordan’s earlier request for information, the subpoena has a more limited scope. In a letter dated August 1st, he ordered Loren Merchan to turn over any and all documents pertaining to her work for Biden and Harris, as well as any that mentioned the prosecution or indictment of Trump.

Jordan is granting Nellis until September 13th to comply, as per the subpoena that the press was able to obtain.

In a post on X (Twitter) on Wednesday afternoon, Nellis responded to the subpoena by stating that the company was “thoroughly reviewing the subpoena with our legal team and will provide updates as soon as we have more information.”

“Let us be clear: these allegations against our company are completely false and purely politically motivated,” Nellis said. “This is a blatant attempt to intimidate us and divert attention from Donald Trump’s conviction. We refuse to be bullied, and we will not allow House Republicans or MAGA extremists to spread lies about our work. We remain steadfast in our mission and are deeply grateful for the unwavering support of our friends and family during this time.”

Due to his daughter’s job position and her political activities, many have accused Judge Merchan of having political bias. Before the trial started, Merchan was asked by Trump’s legal team to disqualify himself, but he refused.

In a June 2023 ruling, a New York state ethics panel comprised of mostly Democrats upheld Merchan’s choice.

However, Jordan argued, “Judge Merchan’s conflicts of interest and biases in the case against President Trump, the Republican nominee in the upcoming 2024 presidential election, implicate serious federal interests.”

“Congress has a specific and manifestly important interest in preventing politically motivated prosecutions of current and former presidents, especially in venues in which real or perceived biases exist. Among other things, if state or local prosecutors are able to engage in politically motivated prosecutions of Presidents of the United States (current or former) for personal acts, this could have a profound effect on how presidents choose to exercise their powers while in office,” the letter added.

Trump’s hearing is currently scheduled for September 18th.

Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts

[conclubiltz]

Arizona DUI Lawyer

Beyond the criminal penalties, a DUI can also have other long-term consequences. It can affect your insurance rates, making it more expensive to insure your vehicle. It can also impact your employment, as many employers do not want to hire someone with a DUI on their record. A DUI can also damage your reputation and relationships with friends and family. Our job as Arizona DUI attorneys at Genesis DUI & Criminal Defense Lawyers in Arizona is to hold the State accountable and make them prove beyond a reasonable doubt that their claims against you are true. Many DUI cases are won and lost on technicalities, often revolving around how evidence against you is gathered and handled. Consequently, you must contact us as soon as possible so we can put together an appropriate plan of action depending on the facts of your particular case. For details visit: https://canyonstatelaw.com/

[elizabethtatelaw45]

Civil Rights Attorney Arizona

Need a civil rights lawyer in Arizona? Elizabeth Tate Law is your trusted advocate for civil rights cases in Phoenix and throughout Arizona. Contact us today for expert legal

Civil Rights Attorney Arizona

About Company:-

Elizabeth D. Tate, Attorney at Law, is a dedicated discrimination attorney who works aggressively to defend her clients’ civil rights. She prides herself on working for real people who want to protect their right to fairness and equality under the law. Whether it is a matter of unfair employment actions, illegal consumer discrimination or a violation of established federal leave entitlements, she has the skill set and the passion to work for you. Your fight is her fight.

Click Here For More Info:- https://www.elizabethtatelaw.com/civil-rights-law/

Social Media Profile Links:-

https://www.facebook.com/people/Elizabeth-D-Tate-Attorney-at-Law/100064083577083/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/elizabeth-tate-7aa93027/

https://x.com/ElizabethP38085

[chellelawplc]

Can I Work For a Competitor if I Signed a Non Compete in Arizona? Attorney Robert Chelle discusses the topic. #shorts Do you have questions regarding your employment contract or non-compete? We can help! Contact us below. For more information visit our blog post at: https://www.chellelaw.com/can-you-work-for-a-competitor-if-you-have-already-signed-a-non-compete-in-arizona/ https://www.chellelaw.com info@chellelaw.com The information contained in this video is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter.You should not act or refrain from acting based on any content included in this video without seeking legal or other professional advice. The contents of this video contain general information and may not reflect current legal developments or address your situation. We disclaim all liability for actions you take or fail to take based on any content on this site.The operation of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Chelle Law. Any information sent to us through the comments is not secure and will not be treated as confidential. Can I Work For a Competitor if I Signed a Non Compete in Arizona? published first on https://www.youtube.com/@chellelaw/

[msclaritea]

North Koreans stole Americans' identities and took remote-work tech jobs at Fortune 500 companies, DOJ says | Fortune

Thousands of North Koreans stole Americans’ identities and took remote-work tech jobs at Fortune 500 companies, DOJ says

BYERIC TUCKER AND THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

May 16, 2024 at 7:26 PM EDT

The Justice Department on Thursday announced the arrests of three people in a complex stolen identity scheme that officials say generates enormous proceeds for the North Korean government, including for its weapons program.

The scheme involves thousands of North Korean information technology workers who prosecutors say are dispatched by the government to live abroad and who rely on the stolen identities of Americans to obtain remote employment at U.S.-based Fortune 500 companies, jobs that give them access to sensitive corporate data and lucrative paychecks.

The fraud is a way for heavily sanctioned North Korea, which is cut off from the U.S. financial system, to take advantage of a “toxic brew” of converging factors, including high-tech labor shortage in the U.S. and the proliferation of remote telework, Marshall Miller, the Justice Department’s principal associate deputy attorney general, said in an interview.

The Justice Department says the cases are part of a broader strategy to not only prosecute individuals who enable the fraud but also to build partnerships with other countries and to warn private-sector companies of the need to be vigilant about the people they’re hiring. FBI and Justice Department officials launched an initiative in March and last year announced the seizure of website domains used by North Korean IT workers.

“More and more often, compliance programs at American companies and organizations are on the front lines of protecting our national security,” “Corporate compliance and national security are now intertwined like never before.”

The Justice Department says the conspiracy has affected more than 300 companies — including a high-end retail chain and “premier Silicon Valley technology company” — and generated more than $6.8 million in revenue for the workers, who are based outside of the U.S., including in China and Russia.

The three people arrested include an Arizona woman, Christina Marie Chapman, who prosecutors say facilitated the scheme by helping the workers obtain and validate stolen identities, receiving laptops from U.S. companies who thought they were sending the devices to legitimate employees and helping the workers connect remotely to the company.

According to the indictment, Chapman ran more than one “laptop farm” where U.S. companies sent computers and paychecks to IT workers they did not realize were overseas.

At Chapman’s laptop farms, she allegedly connected overseas IT workers who logged in remotely to company networks so it appeared the logins were coming from the United States. She also is alleged to have received paychecks for the overseas IT workers at her home, forging the beneficiaries’ signatures for transfer abroad and enriching herself by charging monthly fees.

The other two defendants include a Ukrainian man, Oleksandr Didenko, who prosecutors say created fake accounts at job search platforms and was arrested in Poland last week, and a Vietnamese national, Minh Phuong Vong, who was arrested Thursday in Maryland on charges of fraudulently obtaining a job at a U.S. company that was actually performed by remote workers who posed as him and were based overseas.

It was not immediately clear if any of the three had lawyers.

Separately, the State Department said it was offering a reward for information about certain North Korean IT workers who officials say were assisted by Chapman.

And the FBI, which conducted the investigations, issued a public service announcement that warned companies about the scheme, encouraging them to implement identity verification standards through the hiring process and to educate human resources staff and hiring managers about the threat.

[lawyersdatascraping]

California Employment Lawyer Email List

Unlocking Opportunities: The Power of California Employment Lawyer Email List by LawyersDataLab.com

In the highly competitive legal landscape, law firms and marketing companies targeting lawyers are increasingly turning to innovative strategies to enhance their outreach and communication. LawyersDataLab.com presents a valuable solution with its California Employment Lawyer Email List, offering a dynamic tool that can significantly impact law firm marketing and support the goals of lawyers marketing companies.

The Significance of Targeted Email Lists

In an era where digital communication plays a pivotal role, email marketing remains a cornerstone for businesses seeking to connect with their target audience effectively. The California Employment Lawyer Email List by LawyersDataLab.com serves as a strategic asset, enabling law firms and lawyers marketing companies to streamline their outreach efforts.

1. Precise Targeting

The California Employment Lawyer Email List provides a curated database of contacts specifically focused on employment law practitioners in California. This precision targeting allows law firms to direct their marketing efforts towards a highly relevant and interested audience, enhancing the effectiveness of their campaigns.

2. Strengthening Client Acquisition

For law firms seeking to expand their client base in the employment law domain, this email list proves invaluable. It facilitates direct communication with potential clients, allowing law firms to showcase their expertise, share relevant content, and ultimately establish a connection that can lead to client acquisition.

3. Tailored Content Delivery

Lawyers marketing companies can leverage the California Employment Lawyer Email List to deliver tailored content to a niche audience. From newsletters to informational resources, targeted emails enable these companies to engage with lawyers specializing in employment law, demonstrating their industry knowledge and the value they bring to legal professionals.

How LawyersDataLab.com Stands Out

LawyersDataLab.com sets itself apart as a reliable provider of legal industry data, and the California Employment Lawyer Email List is a testament to their commitment to quality and effectiveness in legal marketing.

1. Comprehensive and Updated Data

The email list provided by LawyersDataLab.com is not just comprehensive but regularly updated. This ensures that law firms and lawyers marketing companies have access to accurate and current contact information, increasing the chances of successful communication.

2. Customization Options

Recognizing that every law firm and marketing company has unique requirements, LawyersDataLab.com offers customization options for their email lists. This flexibility allows clients to tailor their outreach efforts according to specific criteria, ensuring a more personalized and targeted approach.

3. Compliance and Data Security

LawyersDataLab.com prioritizes legal and ethical considerations. Their practices adhere to data protection regulations, providing clients with the assurance that their email marketing campaigns comply with industry standards and legal requirements.

4. Ongoing Support

Backed by a team of experts, LawyersDataLab.com offers ongoing support to clients utilizing the California Employment Lawyer Email List. From initial setup to assistance with campaign optimization, their dedicated team ensures a seamless experience for those seeking to leverage this powerful resource.

Lawyers Email List Provider in USA

Alabama Lawyers Email List

Arizona Lawyers Email List

Nebraska Lawyers Email List

New York Lawyers Mailing List

Kybar Lawyers Email List

Bankruptcy Lawyers Email List

Statebar Association Lawyers Email List

Lawyers Email Database

Texasbar Association Attorneys Email List

Calbar Attorney Email List

California Employment Lawyer Email List Provider in USA

San Antonio, Detroit, Louisville, Oklahoma City, Sacramento, Charlotte, Portland, Philadelphia, New Orleans, Washington, Honolulu, Phoenix, Virginia Beach, Tulsa, Raleigh, Baltimore, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Nashville, Indianapolis, Colorado, Fort Worth, El Paso, Atlanta, Jacksonville, Arlington, Dallas, Austin, Kansas City, Bakersfield, Albuquerque, Long Beach, Mesa, Milwaukee, Omaha, Houston, Tucson, Denver, San Diego, Fresno, Colorado Springs, Chicago, Wichita, Miami, Boston, Memphis, Seattle and New York.

Conclusion

The California Employment Lawyer Email List by LawyersDataLab.com emerges as a strategic tool for law firms and lawyers marketing companies alike. In a landscape where personalized and targeted communication is key, this email list offers a pathway to enhanced outreach, client acquisition, and the establishment of valuable connections within the legal community. Choose LawyersDataLab.com for a reliable partner in unlocking the full potential of your law firm marketing or lawyers marketing company strategies.

Website: LawyersDataLab.com

Email: info@lawyersdatalab.com

[dentistattorney]

Dentist Contract Attorney

Attorney Robert Chelle established Chelle Law in 2011 after moving from the midwest to Arizona with his family. Chelle Law provides legal counsel to dental professionals needing employment contract review. The attorneys with Chelle Law have drafted, reviewed, or negotiated thousands of healthcare contracts, including dentist or dental associate employment agreements, over the last 20 years.

Robert has experience with the legal departments of three of the finest healthcare providers in the country, including:

Johns Hopkins Hospital (Baltimore, MD) Rush Health System (Chicago, IL) Kettering Health Network (Dayton, OH) He has also been involved in physician practice management for individual physicians and physician practice groups and managing a multi-specialty employed physician network for a mid-size medical center.

The attorneys with Chelle Law aim to provide simplified contract analysis focusing on the things that will directly affect a dental professional’s career, including:

Compensation and Productivity Bonuses Non-Compete Malpractice Insurance Termination Provisions Repayment Obligations

[xtruss]

The First Four Women Supreme Court Justices: Sandra Day O'Connor, Sonia Sotomayor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Elena Kagan, October 1, 2010. photographer Steve Petteway, the Supreme Court of the United States

On Being the First Woman on the Supreme Court of The United States

A friend and former law clerk of Sandra Day O’Connor reflects on her pioneering career.

— September 10, 2021 | Ruth McGregor

The Nomination

I was driving to work. On my car radio I heard President Reagan, and he’s saying, “She is truly a person for all seasons.” But I had missed the first part of it where he said the name of the person he was nominating, and he didn’t say her name again throughout his remarks. So after he finished this short statement, somebody came on, one of the commentators, and said who he had nominated.

And I just burst into tears. I pulled my car off to a side street and just sat there and cried for a while until I could get back under control and drive to work.

I think the women hoped that she would be a voice for women’s rights, that she would be a voice against discrimination against women and other protected groups. I think women expected that she would be supportive of women’s groups and issues. And she was.

She was always, in my experience, very much in favor of women being given equal opportunities. She was always very much in favor of the laws that gave women equal employment opportunities, equal credit opportunities. She was very supportive of women’s bar associations and the National Association of Women Judges. She was always willing to lend her time and her name and support for those things.

Discrimination and Access

She liked to say that she didn’t feel she had been discriminated against, and yet, when you hear her tell her stories about the way she was treated by fellow state senators, it’s obvious that she was. [It] was obvious to her. Her classmate Bill Rehnquist is clerking for the United States Supreme Court, and she’s working initially for no money for a county attorney’s office.

People wouldn’t interview her and hire her. So on some level, she expected to be treated fairly with the men, but she got a real education in that she would not be pretty early on. So it seems clear to me that she was discriminated against. It’s not really surprising, when you think about how she was raised, that she came with the expectation that hard work and ability would overcome any other potential problems.

Growing up on [a] ranch she was treated equally. She was expected to do the same things that the men on the ranch did. She was expected to be able to hold up her end of the bargain. She was expected to be able to help with roundups and whatever it was that needed to be done.

She grew up in Eastern Arizona, went to school in Texas, and the West was different in its view of women and the value of women than some parts of the country. Arizona was a community property state, women had some property rights that people in common law states didn’t have, and it was much more an even playing field. So she grew up in an atmosphere where she was expected to do the same and was treated much the same.

Sandra Day O'Connor, 1982. Credit: National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution, Michael Arthur Worden Evans.

Commitment to Fairness

She did so much for so many people to help them along the way, to encourage them, to push them, to make opportunities where she could, to remind people that there needed to be women on commissions and committees. A lot of what she did probably no one saw, because it was when she was meeting with people and saying, “I don’t see any women in this room,” and then they would go find some women to be part of the group.

She of course didn’t like to call herself a feminist, although in my view, she clearly was. There’s no question. She believed women should be able to be on an equal footing with men. The most basic tenant of feminism. I think the reason she didn’t say she was a feminist was because her view of a feminist was somebody who was demonstrating in the streets.

If you take away that kind of stereotype of feminists in the 1970s, then you look to see what was the role of the women’s movement? It was to remove barriers to women so that they were able to do what they wanted to do. It was to remove barriers within employment, within education, and all of those things were things that she had found a way around without the benefit of the laws that helped women later. Nothing would frustrate her more than to suggest a woman wasn’t able to do a job, because that’s not the way she was raised. It’s not the way she lived her life. It’s not the way she acted.

She did become noted for the diversity of her law clerks, and this obviously was a very deliberate act on her part. She noted—and it’s pretty obvious—that almost all the law clerks come from just a few law schools. Almost all the law clerks come from just a few circuit court judges. And she knew there were a lot of other people out there who were qualified to work as a clerk at the Supreme Court.

So she broadened the law schools that she hired law clerks from. She brought in more women as law clerks. More diversity in terms of physical ability. I think this is something that people don’t understand totally about her when they ask about her views toward discrimination. Her view simply was that nobody should be prevented ever from doing something they’re qualified to do. Whether it was women, whether it was African-Americans, whether it was Hispanics, nobody should be disqualified from doing something because of a particular characteristic. And that was just as clear to her as anything ever could be.

So it’s not surprising that she found a way to add more diversity to her law clerks, because she was in a unique position to give people an opportunity that really would help them in their later career. Being a Supreme Court law clerk is a big advantage to people, and I really always thought she just couldn’t bear the notion that some people couldn’t reach their full ability. And so if she could do something to move it along, she would.

From her opinions and what she wrote, you can see her attempt to come to a standard that she thought was both applicable and protective of all the parties involved in that decision. Her opinions were for the most part limited to the issues that came to the Court. She regarded that as the appropriate approach for the Court to take, not to make broad, sweeping generalizations, but to decide the case before them.

— Our interview with Ruth McGregor has been edited for clarity. McGregor was Justice O'Connor's former clerk at the Supreme Court in 1981 and a longtime friend.

[nicklloydnow]

“The recent announcement that Kroger (NYSE:KR) and Albertsons (NYSE:ACI) would collectively sell more than 400 of their stores to C & S Wholesalers have contributed to sanguine aspirations Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan will ultimately approve the merger of the two grocery giants.

It shouldn't.

First, Khan is already skeptical of such divestitures in pursuit of mergers and even wrote a law review article in the Harvard Law and Policy Review ( 11 HLPR 235 (2017)) of the Albertsons and Safeway merger of 2015 that could be somewhat analogous to the Kroger/Albertsons merger.

(…)

Second, and little remarked upon by analysts, is how the merger will likely create a monopsony, or single buyer, in the market for grocery workers in many markets. While the merger partners have repeatedly asserted that they'll treat their employees, whom they call "associates" fairly, C&S Wholesale has a rather hostile view toward union workers and a limited union worker footprint. For example, its tuition assistance benefits are explicitly prohibited to union employees.

We already know Kroger workers who were surveyed last year are struggling to make ends meet. As we wrote in May,

A survey of 36,000 workers at Kroger brands in four states by The Economic Roundtable and Occidental College found 78% of the workers report they are food insecure. They run out of food before the end of the month, skip meals and are hungry sometimes. Forty-four percent reported they are re unable to pay for rent and 14% are homeless now or in the past year."

Grocery workers are among the lowest paid workers in the country, earning, on average, well below the poverty line for a family of four. Monopsony can only have a further deleterious effect on grocery workers' wages in small towns and so-called "food deserts" in urban areas that both have limited grocery shopping - and employment - options.

Finally, this all come in the context of the 2024 presidential and Congressional elections with an incumbent administration that has focused heavily on what it calls "equity" and that has heavily endorsed workers in labor unions. Moreover, the Secretaries of State of seven states, including the "swing state" of Arizona, have questioned the merger, as has Colorado, Maine, Minnesota, New Mexico, Rhode Island and Vermont. Attorneys general in California, Illinois, Maryland, and Nevada - all part of the Biden Administration electoral college base - have either commenced actions against the merger or are considering it.

(…)

Kroger and Albertsons have said they will pursue the merger through the courts, but that would take several months and, perhaps, even years.

This merger is dead.”

[chellelawvet]

Attorney Robert Chelle established Chelle Law in 2011 after moving from the midwest to Arizona with his family. Chelle Law provides legal counsel to veterinary professionals needing employment contract review. The attorneys with Chelle Law have drafted, reviewed or negotiated thousands of healthcare contracts, including veterinarian or veterinary associate employment agreements over the last 20 years.