Tumgik
#District 14-6A
dfwnews · 2 years
Text
Rowlett spoils Wylie East’s perfect season
Rowlett spoils Wylie East’s perfect season
All that stood between the Wylie East Raiders (9-1, 7-1 in 9-6A) and their first undefeated regular season in program history was the Rowlett Eagles (4-6, 4-4 in 9-6A).  Rowlett, who entered the game in fifth place in District 9-6A, stole that milestone right out of East’s hands in a 35-28 win. The Raiders were down 35-14 at one point in the fourth quarter and were able to cut that lead to seven…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
irvinenewshq · 2 years
Text
Azerbaijan to public sale property of DemirBank
BAKU, Azerbaijan, October 14. The immovable property of Azerbaijan’s DemirBank CJSC, which is being liquidated, can be put up for public sale on the Heart for Group of Auctions in Baku on November 2, Pattern experiences by way of the Azerbaijan Deposit Insurance coverage Fund. A non-residential premise with an space of two,389 sq. meters in Shaki metropolis (6A Sabit Rahman road) can be put up for public sale. The beginning worth is 1.1 million manat ($882,352). 5 p.c of the sale worth should be paid to the organizer of the public sale. The acquisition worth should be paid by the customer inside seven calendar days. These wishing to take part within the public sale can submit the mandatory paperwork on the following tackle: 27 Badamdar Freeway, Sabayil district, Baku, Azerbaijan. Telephone: (+99455) 206-66-67 Originally published at Irvine News HQ
0 notes
yourlocalnews · 2 years
Text
0 notes
cypressnewsreview · 6 years
Text
Five Cypress, Jersey Village ballers earn All-State honors
Five Cypress, Jersey Village ballers earn All-State honors
JERSEY VILLAGE — Led by Jersey Village High School seniors Kayleigh Truong and Kaylynne Truong, five CFISD basketball standouts earned all-state accolades by either the Texas Association of Basketball Coaches (TABC) or the Texas Girls Coaches Association (TGCA). Kayleigh and Kaylynne Truong were named all-state honorees by both organizations.
Jersey Village High School senior Kaylynne Truong…
View On WordPress
2 notes · View notes
Text
Top 25 Top 40 Hits of 2004
Honorable mentions: Are You Gonna Be My Girl -- Jet (#29 -- peak Apr. 24) (#76 -- YE 2004)* Welcome Back -- Mase (#32 -- peak Jun. 19) Breathe, Stretch, Shake -- Mase Featuring P. Diddy (#28 -- peak Oct. 2) On The Way Down -- Ryan Cabrera (#15 -- peak Oct. 16) (#73 -- YE 2004) Breakaway -- Kelly Clarkson (#6 -- peak Nov. 20) (#74 -- YE 2004) (#27 -- YE 2005) Goodies -- Ciara Featuring Petey Pablo (#1 -- peak Sep. 11) (#9 -- YE 2004) My Immortal -- Evanescence (#7 -- peak Apr. 10) (#19 -- YE 2004)* Tipsy -- J-Kwon (#2 -- peak Apr. 17) (#11 -- YE 2004) Slow Jamz -- Twista Featuring Kanye West & Jamie Foxx (#1 -- peak Feb. 21) (#16 -- YE 2004) Overnight Celebrity -- Twista (#6 -- peak May 22) (#31 -- YE 2004) Rubber Band Man -- T.I. (#30 -- peak Mar. 20) 99 Problems -- Jay-Z (#30 -- peak Jun. 26) Dirt Off Your Shoulder -- Jay-Z (#5 -- peak Apr. 10) (#21 -- YE 2004) 100 Years -- Five For Fighting (#28 -- peak May 22) (#77 -- YE 2004) Come Clean -- Hilary Duff (#35 -- peak Mar. 27) My Band -- D12 Featuring Eminem (#6 -- peak May 15) (#59 -- YE 2004) Leave (Get Out) -- JoJo (#12 -- peak Jul. 31) (#40 -- YE 2004) Confessions Part II -- Usher (#1 -- peak Jul. 24) (#12 -- YE 2004) Meant To Live -- Switchfoot (#18 -- peak Jul. 31) (#51 -- YE 2004)* Dreams -- Diana DeGarmo (#14 -- peak Jul. 17) Tempted To Touch -- Rupee (#39 -- peak Nov. 20) Ocean Avenue -- Yellowcard (#37 -- peak Jun. 26)* Redneck Woman -- Gretchen Wilson (#22 -- peak May 22) (#97 -- YE 2004) Here For The Party -- Gretchen Wilson (#39 -- peak Oct. 2) Breaking The Habit -- Linkin Park (#20 -- peak Sep. 18) (#79 -- YE 2004)*
25. 1985 -- Bowling For Soup (#23 -- peak Nov. 13)* 24b. Move Ya Body -- Nina Sky Featuring Jabba (#4 -- peak Aug. 7) (#22 -- YE 2004) 24a. Oye Mi Canto -- N.O.R.E. Featuring Daddy Yankee, Nina Sky, Gem Star & Big Mato (#12 -- peak Nov. 13) 23. Dude -- Beenie Man Featuring Ms. Thing (#26 -- peak Jun. 12) (#85 -- YE 2004) 22b. She Will Be Loved -- Maroon 5 (#5 -- peak Sep. 25) (#35 -- YE 2004)* 22a. This Love -- Maroon 5 (#5 -- peak Apr. 24) (#4 -- YE 2004)* 21c. My Boo -- Usher and Alicia Keys (#1 -- peak Oct. 30) (#24 -- YE 2004) 21b. Burn -- Usher (#1 -- peak May 22) (#2 -- YE 2004) 21a. Yeah! -- Usher Featuring Lil Jon and Ludacris (#1 -- peak Feb. 28) (#1 -- YE 2004) 20. Heaven -- Los Lonely Boys (#16 -- peak Aug. 21) (#37 -- YE 2004) 19. One Thing -- Finger Eleven (#16 -- peak Oct. 16) (#66 -- YE 2004) 18. Culo -- Pitbull Featuring Lil Jon (#32 -- peak Jun. 12) 17. Lose My Breath -- Destiny’s Child (#3 -- peak Oct. 30) (#58 -- YE 2004) (#86 -- YE 2005) 16. I Believe -- Fantasia (#1 -- peak Jul. 10) 15. Headsprung -- LL Cool J (#16 -- peak Oct. 2) (#67 -- YE 2004) 14. Pieces Of Me -- Ashlee Simpson (#5 -- peak Sep. 18) (#39 -- YE 2004) 13. Drop It Like It’s Hot -- Snoop Dogg Featuring Pharrell (#1 -- peak Dec. 11) (#71 -- YE 2004) (#23 -- YE 2005) 12. Slow Motion -- Juvenile Featuring Soulja Slim (#1 -- peak Aug. 7) (#13 -- YE 2004) 11. The Reason -- Hoobastank (#2 -- peak Jun. 19) (#6 -- YE 2004) 10. If I Ain’t Got You -- Alicia Keys (#4 -- peak Jul. 3) (#3 -- YE 2004) 9. Dare You To Move -- Switchfoot (#17 -- peak Dec. 18)* 8. Freek-A-Leek -- Petey Pablo (#7 -- peak Jul. 3) (#14 -- YE 2004) 7. Lean Back -- Terror Squad (#1 -- peak Aug. 21) (#10 -- YE 2004) 6b. My Happy Ending -- Avril Lavigne (#9 -- peak Oct. 2) (#54 -- YE 2004) 6a. Don’t Tell Me -- Avril Lavigne (#22 -- peak Jun. 26) (#92 -- YE 2004) 5. Toxic -- Britney Spears (#9 -- peak Mar. 27) (#48 -- YE 2004) 4. Broken -- Seether Featuring Amy Lee (#20 -- peak Dec. 18)* 3b. Roses -- Outkast (#9 -- peak Jun. 19) (#56 -- YE 2004) 3a. The Way You Move -- Outkast (#1 -- peak Feb. 14) (#5 -- YE 2004) 2. Welcome To My Life -- Simple Plan (#40 -- peak Dec. 25)* 1. Numb -- Linkin Park (#11 -- peak Mar. 6) (#33 -- YE 2004)*
Albums Worth Checking Out: American Idiot -- Green Day Franz Ferdinand -- Franz Ferdinand Winning Days -- The Vines Funeral -- Arcade Fire The College Dropout -- Kanye West SMiLE -- Brian Wilson Good News For People Who Love Bad News -- Modest Mouse Hot Fuss -- The Killers Confessions -- Usher How To Dismantle An Atomic Bomb -- U2 Love. Angel. Music. Baby. -- Gwen Stefani You Are The Quarry -- Morrissey Three Cheers For Sweet Revenge -- My Chemical Romance The Red Light District -- Ludacris Back To Bedlam -- James Blunt Eye to the Telescope -- KT Tunstall Desperate Youth, Blood Thirsty Babes -- TV on the Radio Los Lonely Boys -- Los Lonely Boys Sonic Nurse -- Sonic Youth The Futureheads -- The Futureheads Encore -- Eminem Talkie Walkie -- Air Contraband -- Velvet Revolver The Cure -- The Cure Who Killed...The Zutons? -- The Zutons Vol. 3: (The Subliminal Verses) -- Slipknot Kamikaze -- Twista Shake the Sheets -- Ted Leo and the Pharmacists In Love and Death -- The Used Chuck -- Sum 41 Reise, Reise -- Rammstein
The Bottom of the Pile: Cold Hard Bitch -- Jet (#55 -- peak May 8)* American Idiot -- Green Day (#61 -- peak Oct. 30)* Cold -- Crossfade (#81 -- peak Dec. 25)* Somebody Told Me -- The Killers (#51 -- peak Nov. 27)* Take Me Out -- Franz Ferdinand (#66 -- peak Sep. 4)* Maps -- Yeah Yeah Yeahs (#87 -- peak May 1)* Slither -- Velvet Revolver (#56 -- peak Jul. 3)* Fall To Pieces -- Velvet Revolver (#67 -- peak Oct. 16)* Everything -- Alanis Morissette (#76 -- peak Jun. 5) Just Like You -- Three Days Grace (#55 -- peak Aug. 28)* Shadow -- Ashlee Simpson (#57 -- peak Oct. 30) Save A Horse (Ride A Cowboy) -- Big & Rich (#56 -- peak Sep. 4) King Of The Dancehall -- Beenie Man (#80 -- peak Oct. 23) Float On -- Modest Mouse (#68 -- peak Sep. 4)* The Outsider -- A Perfect Circle (#79 -- peak May 15)* Getting Away With Murder -- Papa Roach (#69 -- peak Nov. 13)* So Cold -- Breaking Benjamin (#76 -- peak Nov. 13)* 8th World Wonder -- Kimberley Locke (#49 -- peak May 15) I Miss You -- blink-182 (#42 -- peak May 15)* You Raise Me Up -- Josh Groban (#73 -- peak Apr. 3) What You Waiting For? -- Gwen Stefani (#47 -- peak Nov. 27)* Hold On -- Good Charlotte (#63 -- peak Feb. 14)*
Alternative songs are the ones starred.
1 note · View note
adastraradionews · 5 years
Text
SATURDAY SPORTS BEAT
FRIDAY FOOTBALL SCORES
Hutchinson 44 Salina South 21
McPherson 31 Rose Hill 7
Newton 15 Eisenhower 13
Ark City 13 Valley Center 7
Great Bend 49 Liberal 20
Maize South 7 Goddard 0
  3A
DISTRICT 5
Halstead 49 Smoky Valley 0
Hesston 43 Chapman 32
Rock Creek 54 Clay Center 14
  DISTRICT 6
Andale 50 Clearwater 12
Collegiate 49 Haven 0
Cheney 55 Wichita Trinity 14
  DISTRICT 7
Nickerson 32 Kingman 0
Holcomb 13 Pratt 6
Hugoton 39 Larned 15
  2A
DISTRICT 4
Riley County 33 Southeast of Saline 29
  DISTRICT 6
Trinity Catholic 36 Remington 14
Garden Plain 64 Independent 8
Conway Springs 41 Chaparral 7
  DISTRICT 7
Cimarron 48 Lyons 14
Southwestern Heights 22 Ellinwood 0
Lakin 18 Sterling 13
  DISTRICT 8
Norton Ellsworth
Hoisington 56 Phillipsburg 28
  1A DISTRICT 2
Hillsboro 72 Bluestem 0
Olpe 48 Marion 6
  DISTRICT 7
Inman 19 Meade 0
Sedgwick 48 Sublette 8
  8-MAN I
DISTRICT 4
Canton-Galva 60 Solomon 0
Bennington 54 Herington 8
Goessel 56 Peabody Burns 8
  DISTRICT 5
Moundridge 56 Central Plains 8
Little River 60 St. John 0
Skyline 42 Macksville 22
  8-MAN II
DISTRICT 7
Norwich 46 Pretty Prairie 0
South Barber gets a forfeit win over Burrton, which forfeited the game Monday due to a lack of numbers.
South Haven 46 Fairfield 0
Central Christian 62 Stafford 14 (non district)
  DISTRICT 8
Otis Bison 54 Chase 6
Minneola 58 Ingalls 14
Bucklin Satanta
  6-MAN
Golden Plains 68 Cunningham 19
  In 6A singles Hutchinson's Gracie Foster went 1-2 while in doubles freshmen Tia Hines and Elizabeth Jackson also went 1-2 while Caroline Fee and Lauren Davis lost both their matches.
  At 5A in Pittsburg McPherson's Taylor Bruce and CeAnna Allen are in the semi-finals this morning while Rachel Carlson and Patty Huerta went 1-2. Perrin Schneider lost her quarterfinal match and will be on the consolation bracket today while Sydney Achilles lost both her matches.
  At 4A in Winfield Buhler Payton Demeyer and Alex Hutton are in the doubles semi-finals this morning while Bethany Yutzy and Kendall Birney went 2-2 on the day with Hesston's Michaela Martin and MacKenzie Unruh on the back side bracket after falling in the quarterfinals. Buhler's Allyah Fredrick and Brittney Teufel and Hallie Krehbiel from Hesston are in the consolation rounds today after losing in the quarterfinals. Gracie Dawes from Hesston lost both her matches.
  At 3-2-1A in Prairie Village Kingman's Hanna Pearce and Central Plains' Emily Ryan advanced to the singles' semi-finals. Kristina Head of Lyons and Sterling's Karissa Wilson lost both their matches Friday.. Sterling's Kinzie Comley and Aubrey Anderson and Central Plains' Zoe Potter and Jennah Jeffrey advanced to the semi-finals. Still alive on the consolation bracket are Sterling's Natalie Schweizer and Riley Richter, Central Plains' Brynna Hammeke and Kyla Metro and Smoky Valley's Rachel Yenni and Karik Elliott.
  The Sterling College Warriors hit the road this afternoon as they head to Lindsborg to face Bethany in the latter's Hyllingsfest game. Pre-game begins at 1 on Oldies 95.9 HK-FM.
  The HCC Blue Dragons host Dodge City this afternoon at noon in their Homecoming game. The Blue Dragons are seeking to remain undefeated at Gowans Stadium while the Conqs are still looking for their first win of the year.
  The Kansas Jayhawks head south to Austin to face Texas tonight... the Crimson and Blue show begins our coverage at 4:30 this afternoon on 94.7 KSKU. K-State hosts TCU this afternoon at 1:30 on FSN
  The other big sports event in Hutch today is this evening at 6 at the Salthawk Sports Complex when HCC and Cloud County face off for the Jayhawk West title. There's no love lost between those two teams, especially in the wake of what happened when Cloud won the match in Concordia
1 note · View note
Photo
Tumblr media
27th May >> Mass Readings (USA)
Monday of the Sixth Week of Eastertide 
    or 
Saint Augustine of Canterbury, Bishop.
Monday of the Sixth Week of Eastertide
(Liturgical Colour: White)
First Reading
Acts of the Apostles 16:11-15
The Lord opened her heart to pay attention to what Paul taught.
We set sail from Troas, making a straight run for Samothrace, and on the next day to Neapolis, and from there to Philippi, a leading city in that district of Macedonia and a Roman colony. We spent some time in that city. On the sabbath we went outside the city gate along the river where we thought there would be a place of prayer. We sat and spoke with the women who had gathered there. One of them, a woman named Lydia, a dealer in purple cloth, from the city of Thyatira, a worshiper of God, listened, and the Lord opened her heart to pay attention to what Paul was saying. After she and her household had been baptized, she offered us an invitation, “If you consider me a believer in the Lord, come and stay at my home,” and she prevailed on us.
The Word of the Lord
R/ Thanks be to God.
Responsorial Psalm
Psalm 149:1b-2, 3-4, 5-6a and 9b
R/ The Lord takes delight in his people.
or
R/ Alleluia.
Sing to the Lord a new song
of praise in the assembly of the faithful.
Let Israel be glad in their maker,
let the children of Zion rejoice in their king.
R/ The Lord takes delight in his people.
or
R/ Alleluia.
Let them praise his name in the festive dance,
let them sing praise to him with timbrel and harp.
For the Lord loves his people,
and he adorns the lowly with victory.
R/ The Lord takes delight in his people.
or
R/ Alleluia.
Let the faithful exult in glory;
let them sing for joy upon their couches.
Let the high praises of God be in their throats.
This is the glory of all his faithful. Alleluia.
R/ The Lord takes delight in his people.
or
R/ Alleluia.
Gospel Acclamation
John 15:26b, 27a
Alleluia, alleluia.
The Spirit of truth will testify to me, says the Lord,
and you also will testify.
Alleluia, alleluia.
Gospel
John 15:26-16:4a
The Spirit of truth will testify to me.
Jesus said to his disciples: “When the Advocate comes whom I will send you from the Father, the Spirit of truth who proceeds from the Father, he will testify to me. And you also testify, because you have been with me from the beginning.
“I have told you this so that you may not fall away. They will expel you from the synagogues; in fact, the hour is coming when everyone who kills you will think he is offering worship to God. They will do this because they have not known either the Father or me. I have told you this so that when their hour comes you may remember that I told you.”
The Gospel of the Lord
R/ Praise to you, Lord Jesus Christ.
————————
Saint Augustine of Canterbury, Bishop 
(Liturgical Colour: White)
(Readings for the memorial
There is a choice today between the readings for the ferial day (Monday) and those for the memorial. The ferial readings are recommended unless pastoral reasons suggest otherwise.)
First Reading
1 Thessalonians 2:2b-8
We were determined to share with you not only the Gospel of God, but our very selves as well.
Brothers and sisters: We drew courage through our God to speak to you the Gospel of God with much struggle. Our exhortation was not from delusion or impure motives, nor did it work through deception. But as we were judged worthy by God to be entrusted with the Gospel, that is how we speak, not as trying to please men, but rather God, who judges our hearts. Nor, indeed, did we ever appear with flattering speech, as you know, or with a pretext for greed–God is witness– nor did we seek praise from men, either from you or from others, although we were able to impose our weight as Apostles of Christ. Rather, we were gentle among you, as a nursing mother cares for her children. With such affection for you, we were determined to share with you not only the Gospel of God, but our very selves as well, so dearly beloved had you become to us.
The Word of the Lord
R/ Thanks be to God.
Responsorial Psalm
Psalm 96:1-2a, 2b-3, 7-8a, 10
R/ Proclaim God’s marvelous deeds to all the nations.
Sing to the Lord a new song;
sing to the Lord, all you lands.
Sing to the Lord; bless his name.
R/ Proclaim God’s marvelous deeds to all the nations.
Announce his salvation, day after day.
Tell his glory among the nations;
among all peoples, his wondrous deeds.
R/ Proclaim God’s marvelous deeds to all the nations.
Give to the Lord, you families of nations,
give to the Lord glory and praise;
give to the Lord the glory due his name!
R/ Proclaim God’s marvelous deeds to all the nations.
Say among the nations: The Lord is king.
He has made the world firm, not to be moved;
he governs the peoples with equity.
R/ Proclaim God’s marvelous deeds to all the nations.
Gospel Acclamation
John 10:14
Alleluia, alleluia.
I am the good shepherd, says the Lord;
I know my sheep, and mine know me.
Alleluia, alleluia.
Gospel
Matthew 9:35-38
The harvest is abundant but the laborers are few.
Jesus went around to all the towns and villages, teaching in their synagogues, proclaiming the Gospel of the Kingdom, and curing every disease and illness. At the sight of the crowds, his heart was moved with pity for them because they were troubled and abandoned, like sheep without a shepherd. Then he said to his disciples, “The harvest is abundant but the laborers are few; so ask the master of the harvest to send out laborers for his harvest.”
The Gospel of the Lord
R/ Praise to you, Lord Jesus Christ.
2 notes · View notes
yourlocalnews · 2 years
Text
0 notes
cypressnewsreview · 6 years
Text
Jersey Village leads four Cypress lady baller teams in TABC rankings
Jersey Village leads four Cypress lady baller teams in TABC rankings
CYPRESS — The Jersey Village Falcon girls basketball team is number five in Texas and leads three other Cypress teams.
At No. 12 is Cy Creek, No. 17 is Cy Ranch, and No. 25 is Langham Creek.
Class 6A 1. Cedar Hill (24-4) 2. Desoto (15-4) 3. Hendrickson (28-1) 4. Dallas Skyline (15-7) 5. Jersey Village (22-2) 6. Garland Sachse (21-4) 7. Duncanville (22-5) 8. Converse Judson (23-4) 9. South Grand…
View On WordPress
1 note · View note
adastraradionews · 5 years
Text
Monday Ad Astra Sports Beat
Tumblr media
HCC Baseball saw its season come to an end Saturday, losing 14-1 to Cowley in the Championship Game of the Central District Tournament at Eck Stadium in Wichita.  Five Cowley Tiger pitchers combined to strike out 15 Blue Dragon hitters. HCC’s lone run came on an RBI groundout from Dylan Nedved in the third inning.  The Blue Dragons finish the season at 44-21.
 The Hutch High swim team finished 19th in the team standings during Saturday’s 6A Girls Swimming and Diving State Championships at Topeka’s Capitol Federal Natatorium. Kennedy Young put together a pair of top-10 individual finishes for the Salthawks.  Young placed 9th in the 200 freestyle and 5th in the 100 backstroke.  
 Results from Friday’s state track and field regionals – the Trinity Catholic boys and Sterling girls both finished second in the final team standings at 2A in Sublette.  For the Black Bears, Grace Rowland earned top finishes in both the triple jump and long jump.  Trinity Catholic’s Joshua Bridgewater & Isaac Miller finished 1-2 in the 400-meter dash.  The Celtics also claimed victory in the 4x400 relay.
At 3A in Cheney, the Haven girls finished 3rd.  Faith Paramore sprinted to a first-place finish in the 800-meters.  She also claimed the top spot in javelin.  Emily Weaver earned a runner-up finish in the 100-meters, while Reese Roper was 4th in the 200.
The Buhler boys & girls each managed top-5 team finishes at 4A in Abilene.  Jordan Hawkins swept both the 100 and 200-meters, while the boys 4x100 relay team was also victorious.  Distance runner Leah Bentley placed 3rd in the 1600 and 2nd in the 800-meters.  Meanwhile a big day for Nickerson’s Hunter Jones, saw the senior claim top finishes in both high jump and triple jump.
The Hutch High girls were crowned regional champs at the 6A meet in Wichita, where the 4x100 relay team was victorious.  In field events, Jalya Bynum in shot put, Carter McFadden in long jump, and Limon Liberty in high jump all earned first place finishes.  For the Salthawk boys, distance runner Noah Cole qualified for state in two events, finishing 3rd in the 1600, while fending off the competition for a 1st place finish in the 3200-meters.
0 notes
cyndichamberssports · 7 years
Photo
Tumblr media
#FromTheSidelines Locked In North Marion's Cameron Martinez listening to Coach Dale Hall after their win during last week's District playoffs. The Colts advance to 6A Regional playoffs against Dunnellon tonight. The Tigers are 14-11 and the Colts are 17-9. 1st pitch is at 7pm at North Marion High School. 📸 @cyndichamberssports • • • @fhsaa #2017FHSAAbaseballchampionships #northmarioncolts #team #highschoolbaseball #baseball #sports #sportshooter #sportsphotography (at North Marion High School)
1 note · View note
TXHSHoops: Cy Falls, Texas City & Timberview Pick Up Big Wins
17-6A: #8 Cy Falls (18-3, 3-0) 70, Cy-Fair (10-11, 2-1) 42 at Cypress’ Berry Center
Tumblr media
Cy Falls used offense and defense to take the outright lead in 17-6A. Nigel Hawkins was one of nine Eagles to find the scoreboard, but his first half set him apart. He scored 16 points before halftime, and finished with 24. Kendall Scott also had a successful opening half, and scored 10 of his 16 during that span.
The Eagles led Cy-Fair 39-30 at halftime, but started to pull away in the final two periods. Defense was the difference, so Bobcat players, like Noah Thomas, couldn’t get going in the second half. He only scored four of his 18 points during that time, and his team made as many free throws (4/8) as field goals (4/28).
The Eagles started the day in a three-way tie atop the district standings, but now lead Cy Creek, Cy-Fair, Cy Ranch, Jersey Village and Langham Creek by a game. JV entered the picture with a surprising win at Cy Ranch tonight, while Langham Creek and Cy Creek beat Cy Lakes and Cy Ridge respectively.
23-5A: Texas City (16-6, 6-1) 78, #8 Fort Bend Marshall (18-6, 5-2) 64
Watch out world! Texas City is coming for you!
Okay, maybe we took it a step too far there. Let’s try it again. Watch out 23-5A! The Stingarees will strike when you’re least expecting it!
Ask Marshall about Texas City, and how they’re no slouch. The Stings turned around their losing ways this season, so an 11-point hole was nothing to them tonight. They bounced back with a 30-point quarter in the second, and ultimately knocked off a top-10 team in the state.
That’s an amazing feat, considering where the team was last season, but it wouldn’t have happened without a pair of seniors leading the way. Michael Walker and James Scott were a combined 14-of-23 from the field, and 4-of-6 from three. Walker led the team with 19 points, and Scott added 17.
10-5A: #3 Mansfield Timberview (17-5, 4-0) 61, #5 Lancaster (13-8, 1-3) 60-OT
There was a lot of hype surrounding this game, and it was as good as advertised. The teams and their stars showed up, so it made for an entertaining night. They battled for five periods, and no group led by more than three after one of them.
So what was the difference tonight? Timberview’s depth...like I mentioned in the preview. Tim Johnson led the Wolves with 24 points, Chris Mullins added 16, and Isaac Likekele finished with 12. Lancaster’s T.J. Starks led all scorers with 28, but it wasn’t enough in the loss.
If you enjoyed the recaps, follow the show on Facebook (The Lone Star Sports Report) and Twitter (@LSSReport). You don’t want to miss our daily content, or weekly show on Facebook Live (Thursdays from 10-10:30am).
1 note · View note
marymosley · 4 years
Text
DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT 1958 – AN ANALYSIS
ABSTRACT –
This paper fundamentally analyses and acknowledges the 1958 enactment (the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958) on various fronts. The subjects of prime concentration in this paper are the accompanying: Historical foundation of the 1958 Act; Definition of proprietor, inhabitant and premises; Constitutionality of the 1958 Act; Difference among rent and permit; Tenancy not made by installment of lease, waiver or estoppel; Tenancy by holding over and tenure at fortitude; Eviction of occupant on different grounds counted in Section 14 of the 1958 Act; Sub-Letting; Eviction: Rights of Deserted Wife/Divorced Wife; Summary preliminary in ousting cases under Section 14(1) (e) and Section 14-A to Section 14-D of the 1958 Act; Limited Period Tenancy; Bar to the locale of the Civil Court; and Deposit of lease.
  All milestone case-laws but the 1958 Act are talked about with learned exactness. Ongoing exploration on rent control has shown that rent control contrasts enormously in its belongings here and there, contingent upon the particular arrangements of the rent control laws, their authorization, and market conditions. This paper depicts the lodging business sector of Delhi, India, with specific reference to rent control Relevant writing, both on Indian rent controls and on rent controls in different nations, is additionally studied.
Keywords: Rent, Tenancy, the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Statutory Tenancy, License
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
INTRODUCTION
Rent Delhi’s Rent Control Bill was approved by both Houses of Parliament and approved by the President on December 31, 1958. It came into force on February 9, 1959 as the Delhi Rent Control Act 1958. It extends to areas within the limits of the New Delhi Municipal Committee and the Delhi Cantonment Board and the Delhi Municipal Corporation for urban areas. Courts are legally bound to read the provisions of the law harmoniously to balance the rights of the landlord and the obligations of the tenant.
Rent control measures are needed when demand for rental property exceeds supply and tenants are exploited by landlords. These rent control laws (RCAs), including the Rent Delhi Rent Control Act 1958, are intended to serve two main purposes: protect the tenant from paying more than the standard rent and protect the tenant from unilateral eviction.
A LANDLORD PERSPECTIVE
Delhi Rent Control Act 1958 is largely considered tenant-friendly and does not help the landlords cause. Low return rates have almost made the lease a welfare activity for the landlord, and the unwillingness to repair and maintain the property often causes the building to collapse1. Therefore, the quality of the housing is badly hit. Prospective landlords prevent new stock supply from entering the rental market.
LIMITING RENT REVISION
Under Section 6A of the Act, the standard rent, or, if the standard rent is not determined by the provisions of this Act in respect of any premises, the tenancy agreed between the landlord and tenant may be increased by ten per cent every three years. The 1958 Act does not have the mechanism to bring historical rent to the current market rate and permanently gives the tenant the luxury of paying less than Rs 3,500 per month. The law clearly states that all those who pay less will have protection. An amendment in 1988 allowed landlords to increase rent by 10 percent every three years. As a result, a tenant paying a rent of Rs 10 in 1988 hits the ceiling of Rs 3,500 after 184 years. Even paying someone Rs 1,000 in 1988 will cross over in 2027.
If the landlord has spent any improvements, additions or structural alterations on the premises, no expenditure on furnishings, or any necessary or general rent for such premises, and no improvements, additions or modifications have been made to account for determining the premises rent, he may legally increase the standard rent annually.
DIFFICULTY IN EVICTING TENANT
The second debilitating effect of the law is the difficulty the landlord faces in removing the tenant. The conditions under which a landlord can evict a tenant are strict and strictly monitored and can rarely rob the landlord’s property. The Delhi Act has provisions that allow tenants to rely on the tenant after death, which cancels the tenant’s landlord’s impossibility.
Another drawback of the rule is the mismatch between the tenant’s ability to pay rent and the type of accommodation available. Rent control measures have significant administrative costs and extensive approach to law enforcement. Tenants dare by law to make withdrawals and alterations in buildings without the owner’s permission.
THE HIGH COST OF MAINTAINING THE PROPERTY
Under the regulatory regime, rents continue to remain low, while operating costs continue to rise. The situation is even more serious in the case of older tenants who have frozen rents at a historically low level. In the case of these old features, the need for maintenance is high. Old housing stock suffers premature decay and decline because the landlord finds it difficult to manage.
REMOVAL FROM COMMERCIAL PREMISES IS PERMITTED
The Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 limits the expulsion of tenants from commercial premises because of the commercial space in the city at that time. But that was a long time ago. Now this scenario has undergone a sea change and a large number of buildings and courtyards are now rented out for non-residential and commercial purposes.
The Supreme Court has held that the High Court has failed to meet this provision, reversing the full bench ruling of the Delhi High Court, which refused to change the law in favor of landlords as it has been in force for more than 45 years2. The 1958 Act has outlived its purpose. To eliminate this disorder and reduce the differential approach to the law, the Supreme Court bench of Justice BN Agarwal and GS Singhvi said landlords can now demand the removal of tenants from proven residential and commercial premises based on individual needs.
TENANTS PERSPECTIVE
Many RCAs are products of World War I, requiring stringent rent control for soldiers in accessible accommodation.[1] Delhi Rent Control Act 1958 has become a tool for harassing landlords over the next four decades; in the interests of tenants and even if it works well for them.
LANDLORDS EXPLOITED STUDENTS
While many agree that the 1958 law favors tenants, a section of the tenant community appeals that the unfunded status of the law allows landlords to exploit it. This section is for outstation students studying in colleges in Delhi. These students who are miles away from home have no choice but to ignore the demands of the most defenseless tenants and their landlords.
PROTECTION AGAINST EVICTION
A tenant cannot arbitrarily ask his landlord to vacate his premises. Non-payment or discretionary withdrawals are the only two technical defaults by the tenant, which allows a landlord to take back his property. Under the Status of Rent Control Act, tenants of a legal tenant are entitled to the same protection against eviction as is fair to tenants.
However, eviction can now be sought and sought on bonafide requirements and can be claimed not only for the property owner but also for his or her dependent family. Tenants claim that landlords, desperate to evacuate their property, resort to illegal means, such as paying the reverse ‘pagree’ (interest free security deposit), to evict them or to help organized gangs or locals. Police forcibly removed.
The Delhi Central Business District and its peripheral areas are governed by the Delhi Rent Control (DRC) Act, 1948. Landlords under the Ancient Rent Control Act have a limit on their right to increase monthly rent, which is 10 percent less every three years.
After the partition, Delhi saw a huge influx of migrants, which pushed the government to resettle thousands of people. The government is cautious about the social acceptance of all these migrants and fears of rejecting and removing tenants without prior notice from landlords.
To deal with this issue, 8 Delhi and Ajmer-Mewara Rent Control Act, 1948, thereafter 8 Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, established. Under these laws, tenants are entitled to protect from premature eviction. The motivation behind the law is the protection of economically weaker sections that cannot afford a home or apply for loans because of low credit scores.
Under this law, the government limits the rent, distorts the tenants, and makes it common interest among investors to buy a property in Delhi.4 In 1988, the Act was amended, giving an exemption from rent control legislation of more than Rs 3,500 per month. To this day, the law continues with the same old rules, meaning that landlords now do not have the right to amend the lease. Furthermore, they cannot even evict the tenant unless they are in extreme circumstances.
COURT PETITIONS FOR SEVERAL YEARS
The total number of appeals or petitions before the district and the number of additional judges of the Delhi High Court (HC) is over 10,000. Approximately 27.9 percent of all civil cases related to rent control are under the DRC Act, which has not been amended for more than three decades. In 2010, a group of three lawyers and activists challenged the image of the old provisions of the law.
In January this year, a group of landowners approached the Delhi HC bench challenging the constitutionality of the law. This appeal argues that the property is regulated by the tenant, regardless of the market rent, but was ultimately rejected by the court. The Repeal Committee of the Delhi Rent Control Act pledges to take these appeals to the Supreme Court later this year, where they hope some justice will be given to landlords.
OVERCOMING THE CHALLENGES FACED BY THE DRCA
Homeowners in areas covered by the DRCA are on the fence of renting out their property due to the lack of consideration they can get under the law. The situation is ubiquitous. Residential and commercial pockets of the Central District, where more than 10 percent of litigation in district courts is under the DRC Act.
The law allows landlords to increase monthly rentals by 10 percent every three years. This is in stark contrast to the average increase in rents in these areas over the years. When the Act was last amended, the realization of this rate failed to yield a substantial return on investment for the landlord, since the actual monthly rent was around Rs 10 to a maximum of Rs 1,000 in 1988. The law states that assets will be covered under the DRC Act until the average rent reaches 3,500. Here is an analysis of how many years the property will take to get a monthly rental 3,500, which in most cases runs for more than 50 years.
Rent as on 1988 (in Rs) Years until monthly rent amount to Rs 3,500 10 184.38 50 133.71 100 111.09 200 90.09 300 77.31 400 68.25 500 61.23 600 55.5 700 50.64 800 46.44 900 42.72 1000 39.42 Source: Petitioners appeal to the Court, January 2019
CONSEQUENCES OF THE ANCIENT RENT ACT IN RENT DELHI
            The DRC law reduces the quality of housing because landlords are not interested in maintaining properties or improving the quality of amenities, which ultimately leads to lower returns5.[2] These laws not only limit supply but also drive out legitimate seekers of rented housing, which resolves tenants for unregistered and unauthorized arrangements.
            Deepak Chawla, DCRE Properties, South Delhi said landlords are not motivated to make any improvement in property because of the low return under the provisions of the DRC Act and the PAGD system. But,
This year, the Delhi government has allowed the legislation to increase the rent by 25 per cent to fund the building’s landlords, especially the pagdi system and repair works, as most of these buildings are without safety standards. The rules governing DRC law are generally favorable to the tenant, although some states may take the consequences of the rent control authorities of other states. For example, the Tamil Nadu government has now come up with ways to balance rent control legislation.
           The state is expected to increase the rental market in this state to handle eviction disputes. Withdrawing rent control increases property owner confidence by targeting positive rental returns and thereby helping to unlock the potential of the rental housing market.
            There have been petitions in HCs of Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, calling for the repeal of such anti- rent control laws. While some of these appeals have come to fruition, Delhi may not be far away from establishing a favorable tenancy law for parties, tenants and landlords.[3]
CONCLUSION
              The biggest downfall of the Delhi Rent Control Act is that the income from the property is stagnant as the income of the property is stagnant .This has led to the emergence of methods such as key money. Therefore, the law has reduced access to low-income communities for renters, not only because of the black market in rented houses, but because they cannot pay large deposits for rented premises.
           Widespread disagreement between the interests of landlords and tenants has led to an increase in litigation under the Act. A large number of criminal cases are in disputes over rental properties.
            The 1995 Act replaces the old law of 1958, which protected immigrant people from the arbitrary rent increase of wealthy landlords. While property values have skyrocketed, landlords who adhere to rent control regulations continue to receive lower rents. The 1995 law was passed by both Houses of Parliament and was approved by the President, but after the tenants’ street protests, the government lost the will to notify it.
[1] https://www.99acres.com/articles/the-delhi-rent-control-act.html
[2] https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.abstract_id=758327
[3] https://indiankanoon.org/doc/98362/
Disclaimer: This article has been published in Legal Desire International Journal on Law, ISSN 2347-3525, Issue 22 ,Vol. 7
PALLAVI MOHTA
Student of Law, Amity Law School, Noida, Amity University Uttar Pradesh
The post DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT 1958 – AN ANALYSIS appeared first on Legal Desire.
DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT 1958 – AN ANALYSIS published first on https://immigrationlawyerto.tumblr.com/
0 notes
cypressnewsreview · 6 years
Photo
Tumblr media
Beyond the Score covers hoops action Support the Cypress News Review: 1. Bookmark us! 2. Become a monthly patron for as little as $1 via…
0 notes
weluxuryrealestate · 5 years
Text
141 Woodmere Blvd, #6A, Woodmere, NY
$189,000, 2 Bedrooms, 1 Bathroom, MLS #: 3152732
Sunny & Spacious Top Floor Apartment. Elevator Bldg In School District #14. 5 Spacious Closets (One Cedar Closet). Oak Floors, 2 Large Bedrooms, Quiet Corner Apt. Storage, Laundry Room, Bike Rack On Premises. Pet Friendly Building. Close To RR, Shopping & Houses Of Worship.
source https://www.bhhslaffey.com/real-estate/141-woodmere-blvd-6a-woodmere-ny-11598/3152732/76030374
0 notes
ecadimi-blog · 5 years
Text
Student Discipline and Due Process
All children who reside in the State of New Jersey between the ages of 5 and 20 are entitled to a free public education including children with disabilities.  The United States Supreme Court ruled that undocumented children and young adults also have the right to attend school (Plyer v. Doe).  The State of New Jersey Constitution requires the state to provide “a thorough and efficient system of free public schools for all children between the ages of 5 and 18 years.”  Children living in low-income districts, formerly known as the Abbott Districts, can attend pre-school for free. The Newark Public School district is a former Abbott School District.  Discipline of public school children is governed by N.J.S.A. 18A:37-1 through -37.  N.J.S.A. 18A:37-1 obligates students to comply with school rules, pursue a course of study, and to submit to the authority of the teachers and others in authority over them (NJ Rev Stat § 18A:37-1 (2013). N.J.S.A. 18A:37-2 outlines the causes for suspension or expulsion. Pursuant to N.J.A.C. 6A:16-7.1.  the “Code of Student Conduct” defines the standards, policies, and procedures established by district boards of education for positive student development and expectations of student behavior on school grounds, which includes riding on school buses, at school-sponsored functions, and, behavior away from school grounds. for more than 10 consecutive school days from her general education or the special education program when the appropriate procedures set forth in N.J.A.C. 6A:14-2.8 have been followed, but not the cessation of the student’s educational services.  “Expulsion” is the total and complete discontinuance of educational services or the payment thereof for a student. .  The Newark Public School District has a Student Discipline Policy Student/Parent Guide (rev 2012) which outlines procedures for dealing with disciplinary issues/incidents that occur in school. It also describes four levels of misconduct which outlines the appropriate response to a student’s misbehavior. Level I and II do not address suspension but outlines appropriate interventions and corrective actions to be taken when a student misbehaves.  Level I requires parent contact (the manner of which is not defined) while Level II speaks of a parent conference. Neither speaks of a timed parental notification. Upon further examination of the Student Discipline Policy in the Student/Parent Guide categorizes misbehavior at Level III (ex. gambling, cyberbullying, extreme defiance, gender, sexual, racial or ethnic harassment, etc.) which calls for an investigation of the action, a meeting with the student, and a conference with the parent.  In grades Pre-K though K, no suspensions can be issued. Students in grades 1-3, can be suspended for no more than four days upon the approval of a regional supervisor. Students in grades 6 to 12 may be suspended four or more days to a suspension on site pending approval of a regional supervisor.  Level Four infractions (ex. Weapons, bomb threat, alcohol, sexual assault, physical attack on staff, extortion, pulling fire boxes, etc.) for students up to 17 years old can result in an off-site suspension beyond four days. Furthermore, an evidentiary hearing will be conducted by the Regional Superintendent or her designee within 48 hours.  Police intervention may be requested for students over 18 years old. Special education students who are separated from school for more than 10 days (cumulative or consecutive) must have a manifestation determination hearing by the Child Study Team.   In the case where police intervention is required, the school administrator confers with the staff after verifying the incident and parents are notified, even though the Code of Conduct Statement does not address who, how, and when, etc. In a telephonic interview with the for Loading... mer president of Essex County Parent Teachers Association Mr. Lyndon Brown, I asked if he knew of any cases where children were suspended without written parental notification; he replied in the affirmative. (L. Brown, personal communication, August 26, 2019). Brown cited examples of general education children being “told” they were being suspended and could not return to school without a parent/guardian.  There was nowritten or telephonic parental notification given at the time of the suspension, nor any opportunity to address the suspensionuntil after the suspension had occurred.  This is a violation of The Fourteenth Amendment forbidding the State to deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. The right to an education is a protected interest in property which is created and defined" by state statutes or rules entitling the citizens to certain benefits. Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972). With the exception of the treatment of special education children, it appears that short-term and long-term suspensions are nearly identical because the parental notification and student opportunity to redress the complaints prior to serving the suspension violates the students’ due process rights as afforded under the Fourteenth Amendment.  ue Process Clause that can’t be taken away without minimum procedures required by the Clause. The Court found that students facing suspensionsfrom a public school should at a minimum be given notice and afforded some kind of hearing.  The Court further elaborated that if misconduct charges are sustained and placed on the student’s record, this would have a chilling impact the student’s reputation and interfere with future educational and employment opportunities. The exceptions that can be made is when the student is capable of immediate a harm to himself or others, or poses a danger, commits an assault with a weapon, or his presence disrupts the academic process.  The immediate removal of the student can take place to protect the rights of the greater group of students or faculty but the student must have a hearing within 30 days after the first day of suspension. Because New Jersey guarantees a student the right to a thorough and efficient education, the New Jersey Commissioner of Education ruled that a suspended student must be given an opportunity to make up missed work (Haddad). The Newark Public School District needs to reassess, upgrade and rewrite the Student Handbook in plain parent-friendly language and clearly outline the disciplinary action to ensure compliance with both the state and federal statutes. References   American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey, (2011) Students’ Rights Handbook, A guide for public school students in New Jersey, Fourth Edition.  Retrieved from https://www.aclu-nj.org/files/9313/1600/5939/2011studrghtsweb.pdf Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972) Child Trends, EMT Associates (2018) New Jersey Compilation of School Discipline Laws and Regulations. retrieved from https://safesupportivelearning.ed.gov/sites/default/files/discipline-compendium/New%20Jersey%20School%20Discipline%20Laws%20and%20Regulations.pdf Goss v. Lopez. (n.d.). Oyez. Retrieved August 23, 2019, from https://www.oyez.org/cases/1974/73-898 Haddad v. Cranford Bd. Of Educ., 1968 S.L.D. 98 The Newark Public Schools, (2012, August)Student Discipline Policy, Student/Parent Guide Retrieved from http://www.nps.k12.nj.us/cms/wp-content/uploads/sites/59/2014/08/NPSDisciplinePlanandPolicy10-2009.pdf N.J.S.A. 18A:37-1 through -37 https://www.state.nj.us/education/students/safety/behavior/sedp/   You were to consider the following scenario for this assignment: A student notifies you that she has been subjected to bullying through a classmate’s Facebook page. In 500-750-words, address the following: Steps you are required to take that are consistent with state statutes, your district’s school board policies, faculty handbook, and the student handbook; Any First Amendment arguments you think the student with the Facebook page may raise; and Responses you could make to the First Amendment arguments that are consistent with the cases in the assigned readings. Lalita, you wrote an excellent analysis. You referred to local requirements and included a discussion of how the First Amendment applies to bullying. You applied the law to the facts of this case and reached a logical conclusion. Great job!   Read the full article
0 notes