#Playstation 5

[ludovicawrites]

Since I could make some screenshots, I would like to share my favourite place in Alan Wake 2: Saga's mind place. Maybe you see papers and work but I see her true self and I show you her treasures~

[oktaviaslabyrinth]

Raphael's Final Act // Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)

[spongebobssquarepants]

[sonichedgeblog]

Various emotions of Fang The Hunter, from 'Sonic Superstars'. Support us on Patreon

[vgadvisor]

[felrend]

Same

[thequantumranger]

Silent Hill 2 Remake (TBA) | Platform: PlayStation 5

[cluelesshero]

#456 On the hour

I´m a bit of an expert at tricking myself into more gaming

Facebook | Instagram | Shop

[tanalorr-traveler]

“It’s my comfort game!”

The game:

[demifiendrsa]

Official character/demon renders for Shin Megami Tensei V: Vengeance 

[1986tigerlion]

The first robot and puppet to kill a human

[banjo-be]

“I've spent a long time contemplating the etchings of the tree and its roots. Did you know this city used to be a forest? I wonder if our Oldest House wore a different face back then, or if it was always here, a 21st century office building since time immemorial?”

—Dr. Theodore Ash

CONTROL (2019)

[arcadebroke]

[masterhallmark]

Credit for discovery: @misscloudiedays

So a lot of people are confused as to how Epic Mickey Rebrushed meaning Disney probably isn't getting profits works, so let me explain real quick:

What's the Sitch?

If you go to the Steam Page, Disney is not publishing EM Rebrushed themselves like they did with the original EM games, another company ,THQ Nordic, whom Disney does not own is.

This likely means they sold the licensing rights to that company rather than accepting profit cuts.

How this works

Copyright holders often do this if they think the product would make less profits than what they sold the licensing rights for. For example, this happened with the author of the Witcher books, who thought the games would flop and sold the licensing rights instead of accepting a percentage of the profits. He later acted like the victim when the games actually ended up being wildly successful. This also happened to the writer of the American Pokemon Theme Song, who didn't know the Pokemon franchise was going to go on for decades and remain popular, though he was more chill about it and worked something out.

Basically, Disney likely had so little faith in the game, they chose to sell instead of accept profits, which would mean whether you buy or pirate the game wouldn't affect them, since they would have already gotten the agreed upon amount, and they'd probably piss themselves if the profits Purple Lamp gets is more than what they sold it for.

Would they actually do that?

For anyone who questions if Disney would really be dumb enough to do this, REMEMBER THIS IS THE COMPANY WHO:

SHUT DOWN AND ENTIRE VIDEO GAME DEVELOPMENT COMPANY JUST BECAUSE EPIC MICKEY 2 DIDN'T MAKE AS MUCH MONEY AS EPIC MICKEY 1

THOUGHT PEOPLE WOULD ABANDON CONSOLE GAMING IN FAVOR OF MOBILE GAMING

THOUGHT KINGDOM HEARTS COULDN'T POSSIBLY HAVE SEQUELS

HAD A CEO WHO THOUGHT ADULTS DON'T ENJOY CARTOONS

AND THE MOST RECENT BLUNDER OF ALL, THOUGHT DISNEY FANS WOULD PREFER A LUMA KNOCKOFF OVER STARBOY IN WISH, BECAUSE THEY WANTED A MARKETABLE PLUSHIE

Yeah, I think they're that dumb.

Bottom Line

For those participating in the Disney boycott, it is probably safe to get the game, and will not be a breach of your boycott. Buying the game would instead show support to those who actually care about the game while not benefitting the company that abandoned it.

That being said, this is not guaranteed to be completely correct. Keep an eye on things as it develops, and make your own decisions on the matter.

[sonichedgeblog]

Concept artwork of Metal Amy Rose, from 'Sonic Superstars'.

[vgadvisor]