#SPECviewperf
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Tech Showdown: RX 6800 XT Dominates, RDNA 2 Fine on Linux!

Linux activity like RX 6800 XT is Faster Than RX 7800 XT and RDNA 2 Improves with Age Like Vintage Wine
Among the most remarkable motherboards now available comprises the Amd RX 7800 XT. In Microsoft Windows, for now, this GPU provides a modest gain in performance over the Geforce RX 6800 XT. They are now provided with proof, according of Phoronix, showing that the Radeon RX 6800 XT plays far better in Windows 1080p (1920 x 1080) gaming than the Radeon RX 7800 XT achieves at the same resolution.
Those Amd RX 6800 XT was the clear leader above all of the additional video cards manufactured by AMD, Nvidia, which and Intel. The graphics card performance of the previous-generation Geforce RX 6800 XT was as much as 12 percent better than that of the current-generation Geforce RX 7800 XT. The performance of the older model was approximately comparable to that of the Radeon RX 6800.
In justification of RDNA 2, the Geforce RX 6000 series have existed on the marketplace for an extended period now, whose implies they operate on motorists that have been took to a greater extent than that of the Radeon RX 7000 series, which doesn’t seem more than twelve months old yet.
If you compare the two graphics cards based on their basic specs, you’ll see that the Radeon RX 7800 XT has 12 less compute units than its predecessor, the Radeon RX 6800 XT. On paper, the former exhibits around eighty percent more FP32 performance than the later does. The increased clock rates of the Radeon RX 7800 XT aren’t sufficient to make up for the lack of performance in other areas.
Because of the RDNA 3 design, AMD is able to double-pump the compute units, which, in theory, delivers twice the performance. This is made possible by the fact that the RDNA 3 architecture. The workload, and more significantly, the driver, is the most critical factor in determining the final outcome since it instructs the graphics card when it is possible to carry out such an operation.
During this time, the Radeon graphics cards were at the top of the Linux gaming rankings. They were followed by Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 30 series (Ampere), while Intel’s Arc Alchemist was in the last position. The GeForce RTX 3080 was the strongest performance from Nvidia, but it was still outperformed by the Radeon RX 6700 XT. It is interesting to note that the performance difference between the Arc A580 and the Arc A750 was just 8%. In the meanwhile, the performance of the Arc A770 was shown to be 13% superior than that of the Arc A580.
Workstation workloads were another area in which AMD’s RDNA 2-powered graphics cards thrived, demonstrating that the company’s superiority was not limited to the gaming industry. In SPECViewPerf 2020 3.0, the Radeon RX 6800 XT showed between 14% and 87% greater OpenGL performance than the Radeon RX 7800 XT. This was determined by comparing the two GPUs. The Radeon RX 7800 XT was eventually victorious in the ParaView 5.10.1 benchmark, achieving 5% higher performance than the Radeon RX 6800 XT.
In the Linux environment, RDNA 3 hasn’t lived up to its promise, and it’s unclear whether or not performance will improve with updated drivers. While we wait for RDNA 3 to reach its full potential, gaming on Linux is handled quite well by RDNA 2, in the interim. If you’re a Linux gamer who plays at 1080p, there isn’t much of a reason to upgrade to RDNA 3 right now. Perhaps price will be more reasonable by the time RDNA 3 reaches its maximum potential, but for the time being, there isn’t much of a reason to upgrade.
Read more on Govindhtech.com
0 notes
Text
Amd firepro w4100 2gb review

AMD FIREPRO W4100 2GB REVIEW DRIVER
AMD FIREPRO W4100 2GB REVIEW UPGRADE
AMD FIREPRO W4100 2GB REVIEW FULL
AMD FIREPRO W4100 2GB REVIEW PRO
Benchmark Application: Estimated SPECviewperf® 12.1 Geomean Results.
"e Entry-level" means sub-US$250 workstation cards.
AMD FIREPRO W4100 2GB REVIEW FULL
Visit the Manufacturer Web Page for Full Details I/O Ports AMD PowerTune technology dynamically optimizes GPU power usage and AMD ZeroCore Power technology significantly reduces power consumption at idle 4.
AMD FIREPRO W4100 2GB REVIEW PRO
Radeon™ Pro WX 2100 graphics card supports unique power monitoring and management technologies, and has a maximum power consumption of 35 watts. Multi-stream hardware H.265 HD encode/decode for power-efficient and quick video encoding and playback 6. With three discrete DisplayPort 1.4 HBR3/HDR Ready 5 outputs, the Radeon™ Pro WX 2100 graphics card can drive up to three 4K displays 60Hz or one 5K display 30Hz. Industry-leading multi-display technology enabling highly immersive and versatile multi-tasking across up to three displays 4, powered by a single Radeon™ Pro WX 2100 graphics card. PRT accomplishes this by streaming small bits of these massive textures into the GPU as needed, giving compatible applications a virtually endless supply of unique texture data. PRT is designed to utilize absolutely enormous texture files, up to 32 terabytes large, with minimal performance impact. Driving an effective 30-bits per pixel, the Radeon™ Pro WX 2100 is great for any workload requiring that level of detail and color precision.Īllows the GPU featured on the Radeon™ Pro WX 2100 graphics card to provide ultra-high geometry performance and enable smooth handling of complex models. Native support for 10-bits per color channel for color-critical tasks. With a 64-bit memory interface on the Radeon™ Pro WX 2100, users can load small and medium-sized assemblies and data sets and manipulate them in real time. GDDR5 Video MemoryĪllows users to work at great levels of speed and responsiveness. The Radeon™ Pro WX 2100 graphics card supports OpenCL 2.0, allowing developers to take advantage of new features that give GPUs more freedom to do the work they are designed to do.Ī powerful low-overhead graphics API that gives software developers complete access to the performance, efficiency, and capabilities of Radeon™ Pro GPUs and multi-core CPUs. Helps speed up time required to complete single precision operations used within Video Effects and Rendering, Signal Processing, Transcoding and Digital Rendering applications where high performance takes precedence.Įnables professionals to tap into the parallel computing power of modern GPUs and multi-core CPUs to accelerate compute-intensive tasks in leading CAD/CAM/CAE and Media & Entertainment applications that support OpenCL. Up to 1.25 TFLOPS of peak single-precision floating-point performance The Radeon™ Pro WX 2100 graphics card is based on the fourth-generation of Graphics Core Next (GCN) GPU architecture and, like its predecessor, can perform graphic and arithmetic instructions in parallel.
AMD FIREPRO W4100 2GB REVIEW UPGRADE
Not only is the Radeon™ Pro WX 2100 graphics card a great upgrade path over the previous generation AMD FirePro WX2100, it delivers on average 20% greater performance than the current comparable card from the competition 3.Ĥ th Gen Graphics Core Next (GCN) GPU Architecture Powered by AMD’s efficient 14nm "Polaris" architecture, the Radeon™ Pro WX 2100 supports the latest graphics technologies and offers an amazing upgrade path from previous entry-level workstation graphics, delivering an average 94% improvement in performance over the AMD FirePro™ WX2100 2.
AMD FIREPRO W4100 2GB REVIEW DRIVER
Users looking for an entry level workstation graphics solution that provides certified ISV support for many popular design and manufacturing applications, regular enterprise driver updates, and backed by AMD support and warranty, can turn to the new Radeon™ Pro WX 2100 workstation graphics cards to satisfy their needs. These cards are the fastest entry-level workstation graphics on the market today 1. Affordable Professional-Grade Graphics Solutions

0 notes
Text
SPEC Adds Linux Edition of SPECviewperf 2020 v3.0 Benchmark
SPEC Adds Linux Edition of SPECviewperf 2020 v3.0 Benchmark
https://bit.ly/3Gffgky, The SPEC Graphics Performance Characterization (SPECgpc) group updated the Windows version of the workstation GPU benchmark suite – SPECviewperf 2020 … from PCGaming 1 News
View On WordPress
0 notes
Text
How We Test Laptops
The laptop-review process at PCMag.com carries on core traditions that date back to the establishment of PC Labs in 1984: We compare each system to others in its category on the basis of price, features, design, and in-house performance tests.
To evaluate performance, we use a suite of software-based benchmark tests and real-world applications and games, carefully chosen to highlight the strengths and weaknesses in the tested PC's mix of components. That evaluation ranges from the CPU and the memory subsystem to the machine's storage hardware and graphics silicon.
In some cases, we make use of standardized tests created by established benchmark developers. We've also created our own tests, where needed. We also regularly evaluate new benchmark solutions as they hit the market, and overhaul our testing procedure as needed to ensure that we can accurately reflect the effects of the latest technologies.
Our laptop testing breaks down into three rough classes of testing: productivity testing, graphics testing, and a battery-life trial. Here's a breakdown of each.
Productivity Testing
PCMark 10
Our first task is evaluating a laptop's everyday productivity performance using UL's PCMark 10 benchmark, which simulates real-world productivity and content-creation workflows. (UL, or Underwriters Labs, acquired Futuremark, the maker of the long-running PCMark and 3DMark benchmarks.)
We use PCMark 10 to assess overall system performance for office-centric tasks such as word processing, spreadsheet work, web browsing, and videoconferencing. The test generates a proprietary numeric score; higher numbers are better and are primarily meaningful compared to one another.
We run the main test suite supplied with the software, not the Express or Extended version. Note that all else being equal, a higher screen resolution will suppress a system's performance on PCMark 10. (The more pixels to push, the more resources required.)
PCMark 8 Storage
We then assess the speed of the laptop's main boot drive using another UL benchmark, PCMark 8. This test suite has a dedicated PCMark 8 Storage subtest that reports a proprietary numeric score...
As with PCMark 10, higher numbers are better. The results from laptops with cutting-edge solid-state drives (SSDs) tend to cluster together closely on this test.
Cinebench R15
Next in line is Maxon's CPU-crunching Cinebench R15 test. We run this test at the All Cores setting. Derived from Maxon's Cinema 4D modeling and rendering software, this test is a CPU horsepower test. It is fully threaded to make use of all available processor cores and threads. Think of it as an all-out processor deadlift.
Cinebench stresses the CPU rather than the GPU to render a complex image. The result is a proprietary score indicating a PC's suitability for processor-intensive workloads, when used with software that is fully threaded.
Handbrake 1.1.1
Cinebench is often a good predictor of our Handbrake video-editing trial. This is another tough, threaded workout that's highly CPU-dependent and scales well as you add cores and threads.
In this test, we put a stopwatch on test systems as they transcode a standard 12-minute clip of 4K video (the open-source Blender demo short movie Tears of Steel) to a 1080p MP4 file. We use the Fast 1080p30 preset in version 1.1.1 of the Handbrake app for this timed test. Lower results (i.e., faster times) are better.
Adobe Photoshop CC Photo Editing Test
Our final productivity test is a custom Adobe Photoshop image-editing benchmark. Using an early 2018 release of the Creative Cloud version of Photoshop, we apply a series of complex filters and effects (Dust, Watercolor, Stained Glass, Mosaic Tiles, Extrude, and multiple blur effects) to a PCMag-standard JPEG image. (We use a script executed via an Actions file of our own making.) We time each operation and, at the end, add up the total execution time. As with Handbrake, lower times are better here.
The Photoshop test stresses CPU, storage subsystem, and RAM, but it can also take advantage of most GPUs to speed up the process of applying filters. So systems with powerful graphics chips or cards may see a boost.
Graphics Performance
Judging graphics performance requires using tests that are challenging to every system yet yield meaningful comparisons across the field. We use some benchmarks that report proprietary scores and others that measure frames per second (fps), the frequency at which the graphics hardware renders frames in a sequence, which translates to how smooth the scene looks in motion.
Synthetic Tests: 3DMark and Superposition
The first graphics test is UL's 3DMark. The 3DMark suite comprises a host of different subtests that measure relative graphics muscle by rendering sequences of highly detailed, gaming-style 3D graphics. Many of these tests emphasize particles and lighting.
We run two different 3DMark subtests, Sky Diver and Fire Strike, which are suited to different types of systems. Both are DirectX 11 benchmarks, but Sky Diver is suited to laptops and midrange PCs, while Fire Strike is more demanding and made for high-end PCs to strut their stuff. The results are proprietary scores.
Also in our graphics mix is another synthetic graphics test, this time from Unigine. Like 3DMark, the Superposition test renders and pans through a detailed 3D scene and measures how the system copes. In this case, the rendering action happens in the company's eponymous Unigine engine, offering a different 3D workload scenario than 3DMark. This provides a second opinion on the machine's graphical prowess.
We present two Superposition results, run at the 720p Low and 1080p High presets. The scores are reported in frames per second, higher frame rates being better. For lower-end systems, maintaining at least 30fps is the realistic target, while more powerful computers should ideally attain at least 60fps at the test resolution.
Real-World Gaming Tests
The synthetic tests above are helpful for measuring general 3D graphics aptitude, but it's hard to beat full retail video games for judging gaming performance. Far Cry 5 and Rise of the Tomb Raider are both modern, high-fidelity titles with built-in benchmarks that illustrate how a system handles real-world video games at various settings.
These games are run on both the moderate and the maximum graphics-quality presets in the benchmarking utility. (Those presets are Normal and Ultra for Far Cry 5, Medium and Very High for Rise of the Tomb Raider.) We test by default at 1080p if possible and (if the laptop's native display resolution is higher or lower) at the screen's native resolution to judge performance for a given system.
These results are also provided in frames per second. Far Cry 5 is a DirectX 11-based game, while Rise of the Tomb Raider can be flipped to DirectX 12 mode, which we do for this benchmark.
Battery Life Testing
Finally, we perform a video-playback-based battery rundown test, which supports all operating systems, to estimate in a relative sense how long the laptop will last away from a power outlet. Our rundown test involves playing a looped 720p version of Tears of Steel (mentioned earlier), saved on the laptop's storage drive in the MP4 format. If the file will not fit on the system's local storage, we run the video from an SD card or a USB memory key.
Before we start the test, we turn on the system's power-saving mode, crank down the brightness of the screen to 50 percent, boost the audio volume to 100 percent, and disable adaptive screen brightness. Wireless radios, keyboard backlighting, and any case lighting are turned off. We then start the test and run it for as long as a fully charged battery lasts, usually to the point that the system hibernates at under 5 percent battery capacity (as prescribed in the Critical Battery Action we also set in Power Options). If the laptop has more than one battery, we will perform a separate, second rundown test with both batteries installed.
Evaluating battery performance is difficult, since results can vary widely based on the types of tasks performed. (Heavy gaming off the battery, for one thing, will deliver much shorter times.) But in general, we consider a system to offer all-day computing if it lasts more than eight hours on our battery-rundown test.
Special Cases: macOS, Chromebooks, Mobile Workstations
We don't run all of the above tests on every laptop. We only run Far Cry 5 and Rise of the Tomb Raider on laptops that are specifically designed for gaming, equipped with a dedicated graphics processor. And we don't use PCMark, 3DMark, or Superposition for testing Apple laptops, since these tests have no macOS version. To evaluate some specialized subsets of laptops, such as workstations, Chromebooks, and ARM-based systems, we supplement our standard tests.
Chromebooks
With Chromebooks, for instance, of the above tests we perform only the battery rundown test, since that's the only one that's compatible with Chrome OS. Instead of the 720p file, we use a different, lower-resolution source file (a DVD rip of the full Lord of the Rings trilogy, looped) stored (if possible) on the Chromebook's internal storage.
We then run the benchmarks CrXPRT and WebXPRT, from Principled Technologies, to help us make comparisons among Chromebooks. (Because WebXPRT is a web-based test that can run on nearly any PC, we also use it to test laptops with ARM processors.) These are single-click tests without settings to tweak, and they report back proprietary scores that are meaningful only relative to one another.
Workstation Laptops
With workstation laptops, we run all of the above tests and supplement them with a few workstation-specific measures. These specialized tests include the multimedia rendering tool POV-Ray (for a ray-tracing simulation). We also run the SPECviewperf 13 suite, loading three "viewsets" for the apps Creo, Maya, and SolidWorks, to gauge how the workstation machine handles the manipulation of relevant files in these three seminal workstation programs. The POV-Ray results are reported as time to completion of the test task, and the SPECviewperf results are reported in frames per second.
0 notes
Text
DOWNLOAD USBSCAN SYS DRIVER
Downloads: 8452 Price: Free Date Added: 15 September, 2019 Uploader: Sexy File Size: 23 Mb Download Type: http Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X File Version: 516121776 File Format: exe File Name: usbscan sys driver
Fixed Issues: - Revise help string in BIOS.- Fixed 4T HDD not detect in IDE mode. - Fixed login format(usbscan sys driver format) same as DIR-655. - Fixes(usbscan sys driver Fixes) the ST TPM AP will fail after S3 resuem in XP OS. - Fixes Issue(usbscan sys driver Issue) :once BIOS request Supervisor/User/HDD password, BIOS can accept illegal word that ~ and `. - Fixed Enable IPv6 cause high utilization of CPU [DI20150220000004-Japan]11. - Fixed issue(usbscan sys driver issue) whereby system locks when removing port trigger rules 5. - Fixed IDE Secondary Master show wrong string from ATA to PIO when clear CMOS. - Fixes failure of installing Win98 if AC97 disabled. - Fixed a bug where failover could not be canceled temporarily if an online update notice is present. - Fixed System MAC/UUID(usbscan sys driver MAC/UUID) will sometimes lose when AC Power lost. Users content: - Modify Windows8 can't wake up system from S4. Corrects errors in the Spanish and Korean menu screens. Also, when the installation has finished, perform a system restart to ensure all changes take effect properly. Support new CPU. It also supports Wake-up on LAN from S3/S4/S5 and PXE boot support. Fix the error info in the console log when running WDS endurance 3. Download and install AV IP Utility Tool. This file extracts to your hard drive and is placed in a folder that begins with C:\EPSON\epson12052... - Performance Enhancement for SPECViewperf/SPECapc. Change Audio SSID2. Click and download DOWNLOAD AIRTIES 2310 AIR 150MBPS DRIVER. Supported OS: Windows 8.1/8/7/Vista 32-bit Microsoft Windows 8 Enterprise (32-bit) Windows 7 Windows XP 64-bit Microsoft Windows 8 Enterprise (64-bit) Windows Server 2012 Notebook 8.1/8/7 32-bit Microsoft Windows 10 (32-bit) Microsoft Windows 8 (64-bit) Windows Server 2008 R2 Microsoft Windows 8 Pro (32-bit) Windows 8.1 Windows 8 Windows Server 2016 Microsoft Windows 10 (64-bit) Microsoft Windows 8.1 Pro (32-bit) Windows Vista 32-bit Microsoft Windows 8.1 Enterprise (32-bit) Windows 10 Windows 7 64-bit Microsoft Windows 8 (32-bit) Notebook 8.1/8/7 64-bit Windows Server 2012 R2 Windows Server 2003 64-bit Windows XP 32-bit Microsoft Windows 8.1 Pro (64-bit) Microsoft Windows 8 Pro (64-bit) Windows 7 32-bit Windows 8.1/8/7/Vista 64-bit Microsoft Windows 8.1 Enterprise (64-bit) Windows Server 2008 Microsoft Windows 8.1 (32-bit) Windows Vista 64-bit Microsoft Windows 8.1 (64-bit) Windows Server 2003 32-bit Windows 2000 Searches: usbscan sys driver for Windows Server 2012 R2; usbscan sys NBOXT9538; usbscan sys driver for Microsoft Windows 10 (64-bit); usbscan sys N95m; usbscan sys driver for Microsoft Windows 8 Pro (32-bit); usbscan driver sys; usbscan sys Nmb953-mbx; usbscan sys driver for Windows Server 2008 R2; usbscan sys NB9538; usbscan sys N NB953-9; usbscan sys driver for Windows 7 64-bit Compatible Devices: Wifi router; Wifi adapter; Monitor; Soundcard; Tablet; Printer To ensure the integrity of your download, please verify the checksum value. MD5: a10912ae58eb90006f5bb1d1773b7cd2 SHA1: 72730f3555551638c203fac24090097f2f101a28 SHA-256: e0e09f01f02ed0a4cdbed9cec4c863cddce04117d8e56269dd6ae1cabe3e0266
0 notes
Text
AMD מציגה את Radeon Pro W5500 כרטיס גרפי מקצועי

יום שני, 10 בפברואר 2020 AMD מציגה את Radeon Pro W5500 כרטיס גרפי מקצועי AMD הודיעה היום על כרטיס הגרפי של תחנת העבודה AMD Radeon Pro W5500, ומספק את הביצועים והתכונות המתקדמות שדורשים אנשי המקצוע בתחום העיצוב והייצור והארכיטקטורה, ההנדסה והבנייה (AEC). AMD הודיעה גם על AMD Radeon Pro W5500M GPU, שתוכנן ומותאם להפעלת תחנות עבודה ניידות מהדור הבא והביצועים הגבוהים ביותר. כוח העבודה העיצובי וההנדסי של ימינו דוחף את גבולות יישומי העיצוב המקצועיים. אנשי מקצוע אלו הניידים יותר ויותר משתמשים לעיתים קרובות ביישומים עתירי גרפיקה בו זמנית והם אינם זקוקים לביצועים ללא פשרות כדי לדמיין, לבדוק ולתקשר עם העיצובים שלהם בזמן אמת. AMD Radeon Pro W5500 גרפיקה רותמת את ארכיטקטורת AMD RDNA בעלת הביצועים הגבוהים, חסכוני הכוח, טכנולוגיית תהליכים של 7 ננומטר, זיכרון GDDR6 במהירות גבוהה, תמיכה גבוהה PCI Express 4.0 ברוחב הפס ותכונות תוכנה מתקדמות. הם מרחיבים את משפחת AMD של מוצרי גרפיקה מקצועיים בעלי ביצועים גבוהים, והם מציעים ביצועים יוצאים מן הכלל ביישומים בעולם האמיתי, יציבות סלעית ויעילות אנרגיה מעולה. בנוסף, כרטיס המסך AMD Radeon Pro W5500 מספק ביצועים מרובי משימות מדהימים גם במצבים תובעניים, כמו לאפשר לאנשי מקצוע להמשיך ולפתח את העיצובים שלהם תוך הצגת הדמיה ברקע. "מעצבים ומהנדסים דורשים פיתרון גרפי מקצועי המספק את הביצועים והיעילות בכדי לעמוד באתגרים הייחודיים של ימינו. שום דבר אינו מלחיץ יותר מאשר תאריך יעד, וגרפיקה מקצועית של AMD ממשיכה להופיע כשאתה זקוק להם ביותר", אמר סקוט הרקלמן, סגן נשיא תאגיד ו מנהל כללי, קבוצת ראדון טכנולוגיות ב- AMD. "כרטיס המסך AMD Radeon Pro W5500 מספק יעילות כוח יוצאת דופן וביצועי מנהיגות עבור יישומי עיצוב דו-ממדיים ותלת-ממדיים, ומאפשר להם לדמיין טוב יותר אינטראקציה עם העיצובים שלהם בזמן אמת, לחקור את זרימות העבודה החדשות כמו מציאות מדומה ולמקסם את התפוקה." כרטיס המסך AMD Radeon Pro W5500 ו- Radeon Pro W5500M GPU הופכים את האופן בו צוותי הפרויקטים משתפים פעולה בכך שהם מאפשרים הדמיות אמיתיות בזמן אמת של מושגי עיצוב לקבל החלטות מושכלות ומהירות יותר. היכולות והתכונות העיקריות כוללות: ארכיטקטורת AMD RDNA בעלת ביצועים ��בוהים - כוללת מנוע גיאומטרי מעוצב מחדש ויחידות מחשוב, המספקות ביצועים לשעון של עד 25 אחוזים יותר מאשר ארכיטקטורת GCN מהדור הקודם. ביצועי ריבוי משימות מדהימים - כרטיס המסך AMD Radeon Pro W5500 מספק ביצועים מרובים למשימות מצטיינות אפילו במצבים תובעניים, ומציע עד 10X ביצועים טובים יותר של זרימת עבודה מאשר היישום בתחרות במבחן ה- SPECviewperf 13 תחת עומס רב משימות. יעילות כוח עולמית אמיתית - השילוב בין ארכיטקטורת AMD RDNA היעילה בהספק לבין תוכנת Radeon Pro לטכנולוגיית ניהול הכוח החכמה של הארגון מאפשרים לכרטיס הגרפי AMD Radeon Pro W5500 להיות בקנה מידה מדויק כדי לעמוד בדרישות הכוח של יישומים מקצועיים. כתוצאה מכך היא צורכת עד 32 אחוז פחות כוח מערכת בממוצע בזרימות עבודה של דוגמנות מוצקות מהמתחרים. תוכנה ברמה מקצועית - תוכנת Radeon Pro לארגון מציעה שיפורי ביצועים בכל מהדורה ומותאמת לסביבות מחשוב תובענות 24 שעות ביממה, עם פלטפורמת OEM נרחבת ובדיקת אישורי ISV בכדי לספק את דרישת המקצוענים האיכותית. הנהג האחרון (20.Q1) משיג ציון גאומיאני מהיר יותר בכ -15 אחוזים בסטנדרט SPECviewperf 13 מאשר בגרסה 19.Q1 משנת 20194. תחנת עבודה מרחוק של AMD - מאפשרת לאנשי מקצוע לגשת לתחנות העבודה הפיזיות שלהם מכל מקום כמעט עם חוויות גרפיקה עשירות המשתמשות באפליקציות ווירטואליות ושולחנות עבודה של Citrix או בשולחן העבודה המרוחק של מיקרוסופט. זמינות כרטיס המסך AMD Radeon Pro W5500 צפוי להיות זמין אצל הקמעונאים המובילים החל מאמצע פברואר 2020, תמורת סכום של SEP של 399 דולר.
0 notes
Link
0 notes
Link
Prepare to be impressed by the AMD Ryzen 3950X processor. We certainly were when Chillblast sent us a workstation with AMD’s affordable 16-core wonder chip in it. With specs that should make this processor one of the best out there, we couldn't wait to try it out.
The ongoing rise of AMD technology is the single biggest story in PC hardware right now, which is why we’re looking at yet another workstation with an AMD processor this month. Keep reading for our full opinion.
Need a new laptop primed for 3D work? See our pick of the best laptops for 3D modelling right now.
AMD Ryzen 3950X review: Price
Ryzen 3950X is particularly interesting because it has 16 physical CPU cores and can run 32 threads at once, with an (approximate) UK retail price of £749. That’s well below the level Intel has consistently charged for its most high-end chips for years. Until now, those high prices had ensured workstations with more than eight processor cores were simply out of reach for most of us in the CG industry.
The total cost of the full Chillblast system, equipped with a Quadro RTX 4000 graphics card, 32GB of DDR4 memory, 1TB PCIe 4.0 SSD comes to £3,279, which is still £450 less than a rig based around Intel’s 10th-generation platform, which has already had price cuts to make it much more affordable than the previous generation. Intel may lose out on value but one area where it still (just) has a lead is in instructions per cycle, which does affect certain areas of software performance.
AMD Ryzen 3950X review: Design and features

3D software has plenty to gain from processors with more CPU cores. All the popular CPU-based renderers are carefully multi-threaded to offer an approximate linear performance improvement from additional CPU cores. Renders complete twice as fast on an eight-core processor as on a quad-core chip. A 16- core chip is twice as fast again so that extra hardware can mean a final render of a scene with exceptionally detailed lighting and many millions of polygons is reduced by hours.
The high core count is not the only interesting thing about the 3.5GHz (4.7GHz Turbo) Ryzen 3950X processor. AMD is reaping the rewards from the flexibility of its Zen 2 architecture and how manufacturing partner TSMC has managed to beat Intel to 7nm fabrication, allowing them to keep the TDP within a manageable limit of 105W. That’s particularly good news for customers too. The Ryzen 3950X does not require an expensive high-end motherboard with a special chipset. It can be used in nearly all existing Socket AM4 motherboards, although some might need a firmware update.
Ryzen 3950X review: Performance

As mentioned before, Intel just has the edge in some performance aspects. For the Ryzen 3950X, our results show the 3950X breaking all records whenever software is multi-threaded, but not every application takes advantage of those extra cores.
The 3950X storms ahead in Blender CPU rendering and Cinebench but in SPECViewPerf, which relies on graphics card performance, the Intel Core i9 9900K just edges ahead, even if it’s only by a small margin. But we’d still pick the 3950X every time. Sixteen CPU cores gives you real flexibility to tackle seriously heavy-duty computing tasks. AMD deserves considerable praise for its exceptional technical achievement here.
But before you join the queue of eager buyers itching to purchase this processor, be advised that AMD has further tricks up its sleeve. A brand new Threadripper chip with 32 processor cores is set for imminent launch too and it’s public knowledge that a mind blowing 64-core Threadripper product is coming in the next 12 months.
Ryzen 3950X review: Should you buy it?

The Ryzen 3950X is the best AMD processor ever, for its efficiency and affordability as much as its capability and puts the company well in front of its arch rival for the first time in over a decade. Based on the 3D performance it offers for the money, it’s instantly become our top recommendation for any workstation.
0 notes
Text
DOWNLOAD ATI RADEON X9200 DRIVER
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X File Name: ati radeon x9200 driver File Version: 815111312 Downloads: 8845 Price: Free Download Type: http File Format: exe File Size: 23 Mb Date Added: 11 November, 2019 Uploader: Tiggy
Bug fix: - Fixed issue whereby IPv6 in IPv4 tunnelling doesn’t work. - System Changes: -(ati radeon x9200 driver -) Fixed a bug where the system hanged up when the high load affected to the TeraStation. - ATi Source BIOS Version: 012.020.000.001- ECLK/MCLK is 800/1000 MHz- Release for HYNIX memory- Fixed display noise when playing movie. - Fixed booting to a CD using HDD emulation. - Fixed a bug where Settings was not accessible when replicating too many files. - Fixed "Warning Temperature" & "Shutdown Temperature" function failure. - Fixed Curl-SMTP(ati radeon x9200 driver Curl-SMTP) - Mail/SAMBA password bug. - Fixed during playback local movies,popup info can't be(ati radeon x9200 driver be) display completely. - Fixed client duplicated issue(ati radeon x9200 driver issue) in network map Added:- Auto adjust time zone in internet setup wizard process. - Fixed some errors.(ati radeon x9200 driver errors.) Users content: This driver package provides the necessary installation files of Genius SlimStar 8000 Keyboard/Mouse Binding Driver 2. A File Download window appears. Hangs may be observed while running SPECviewperf 12 on 4 VMs with VMware. Support ID3 tags that have asynchronous flag of ID3. Specifications:CPU: - AMD APU C-60 1.0GHz Dual-Core onboard Processors Chipset: - AMD FCH A50M (Hudson M1)Memory: - 2 x DIMM, Max. - "Performance Boost Engine" (PBE) item in Chipset Feature Page,to improvemem performance and default value is "Disabled". Local Upgrade TabUse this option if you are upgrading from a flash drive that has the new firmware. CSCum34719)- Upgrade openssl version. Phones no longer lose BLF subscriptions when Asterisk sends an unrecognized NOTIFY message. Update VGA BIOS 2759 to fix S3 summarized fail exitIt is highly recommended to always use the most recent driver version available. http://i5srealprogramssite.guildwork.com/forum/threads/5e8ebf28881c5937e3a2cc11-download-sony-vaio-pcg-4d1l-driver Supported OS: Windows Server 2003 64-bit Windows 8.1/8/7/Vista 32-bit Microsoft Windows 8.1 (64-bit) Windows 2000 Microsoft Windows 8 Enterprise (64-bit) Microsoft Windows 8 (64-bit) Microsoft Windows 10 (32-bit) Notebook 8.1/8/7 64-bit Microsoft Windows 8 Pro (64-bit) Windows XP 64-bit Microsoft Windows 8.1 Pro (32-bit) Microsoft Windows 10 (64-bit) Windows Server 2016 Windows Server 2008 Windows 10 Windows Vista 32-bit Windows 8.1 Microsoft Windows 8.1 Enterprise (64-bit) Windows Server 2012 R2 Windows Server 2008 R2 Windows Vista 64-bit Windows 7 32-bit Windows Server 2012 Microsoft Windows 8 (32-bit) Windows 8 Microsoft Windows 8.1 (32-bit) Notebook 8.1/8/7 32-bit Windows 8.1/8/7/Vista 64-bit Microsoft Windows 8.1 Enterprise (32-bit) Windows Server 2003 32-bit Microsoft Windows 8 Pro (32-bit) Microsoft Windows 8 Enterprise (32-bit) Windows 7 64-bit Windows XP 32-bit Microsoft Windows 8.1 Pro (64-bit) Windows 7 Searches: ati radeon x9200 I IF374-3; ati radeon x9200 driver for Windows 7; ati radeon x9200 driver for Windows 8.1/8/7/Vista 64-bit; ati radeon x9200 IF3746; ati radeon x9200 Ire374-reg; radeon driver x9200 ati; ati radeon x9200 driver for Windows Server 2008; ati radeon x9200 IFVLK3746; ati radeon x9200 I37r; ati radeon x9200 driver for Microsoft Windows 8 Pro (32-bit); ati radeon x9200 driver for Windows Server 2008 R2 Compatible Devices: Iphone; Memory Card; Scanner; Ipad; Keyboards; Hard Drive To ensure the integrity of your download, please verify the checksum value. MD5: edb479cde739fffadd6dda4b748d1d56 SHA1: 947a77cee5948d7b04b96119e66215435893dfc8 SHA-256: c1969b3d5c380c2e030cf2342009401d43e9aba1c35e15a4ff393a9e5df0ea30
0 notes
Text
DOWNLOAD TOSHIBA CANVIO 3TB DRIVER
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X File Version: 014181611 Uploader: Juhi Downloads: 6875 Date Added: 13 October, 2019 File Size: 23 Mb File Format: exe File Name: toshiba canvio 3tb driver Price: Free Download Type: http
Bug fix: - Fixed PLEXTOR device issue. - Fixed over clock fail,if PCI Express 16x lock on 100Mhz,then CPU clock(toshiba canvio 3tb driver clock) can't be set over 208Mhz. - Desktop(toshiba canvio 3tb driver Desktop) may not be visible or may appear out of the display area when using 8K resolution on Radeon Pro Duo. - Fixed the issue that system may hang when pressing ALT-F2 at full screen logo screen. - Fixed OS installed in the SATA hard disk when both the SATA and PATA hard disks are present ,the PATA hard disk contains the Windows boot files. - Fixed a bug where the "Size on disk" of files on the TeraStation was displayed larger than the actual size on Windows 8.1 or later. - Fixed CMOS Checksum Error. - Fixed(toshiba canvio 3tb driver Fixed) the video delay issue when set camera to MJ stream. - Fixed the bug(toshiba canvio 3tb driver bug) that “Turning off Led light” cannot work sometimes after powering on again. - Fixed the issue that(toshiba canvio 3tb driver that) UPnP cannot work correctly with DCS-942L. Users content: Connect the camera and the computer to the same network via wired connectionII. AMD 780G + SB710 Chipsets 6. Resolves an issue where running the SPECviewperf 10 Application causes the display driver to stop responding. After system restart, press [F2] to enter the BIOS setup utility during boot up. Open and edit several audio files simultaneously. - Multiple fixes that improves the driver's overall stability and performance. Type C:\DELL\DRIVERS\R289635 in the Open textbox and then click OK. Enhanced DHCP WAN compatibility. Important:Converting an Aastra Response Point phone to an Aastra standards-based SIP phone. Qualcomm Atheros AR9485WB-EG Wireless Network Adapter. USB2 TO DRIVER ADAPTER AX88772 DOWNLOAD FAST ETHERNET ASIX 0 Supported OS: Windows Server 2003 32-bit Windows Server 2003 64-bit Windows 7 64-bit Windows Vista 64-bit Windows Server 2008 Windows 10 Microsoft Windows 8.1 (32-bit) Windows XP 64-bit Microsoft Windows 8 Pro (64-bit) Notebook 8.1/8/7 32-bit Windows 8.1 Microsoft Windows 8.1 Enterprise (64-bit) Windows 7 32-bit Windows 8 Windows XP 32-bit Windows Server 2016 Windows Server 2012 R2 Windows Server 2008 R2 Microsoft Windows 8 Enterprise (64-bit) Microsoft Windows 8 (32-bit) Microsoft Windows 8 (64-bit) Windows Server 2012 Windows 8.1/8/7/Vista 32-bit Microsoft Windows 8 Enterprise (32-bit) Notebook 8.1/8/7 64-bit Microsoft Windows 8.1 (64-bit) Windows 2000 Windows 8.1/8/7/Vista 64-bit Microsoft Windows 10 (64-bit) Microsoft Windows 8.1 Enterprise (32-bit) Microsoft Windows 8.1 Pro (32-bit) Windows Vista 32-bit Microsoft Windows 10 (32-bit) Microsoft Windows 8.1 Pro (64-bit) Microsoft Windows 8 Pro (32-bit) Windows 7 Searches: toshiba canvio 3tb driver for Windows 8; toshiba canvio 3tb driver for Windows 8.1/8/7/Vista 32-bit; toshiba canvio 3tb OFMJK9560; toshiba canvio 3tb OF9560; toshiba canvio 3tb driver for Notebook 8.1/8/7 64-bit; toshiba driver 3tb canvio; toshiba canvio 3tb Oum956-umv; toshiba canvio 3tb driver for Windows 10; toshiba canvio 3tb O95u; toshiba canvio 3tb driver for Windows Vista 64-bit; toshiba canvio 3tb O OF956-9 Compatible Devices: Gadget; Wifi router; Video Projector; Android; Samsung; Videocard To ensure the integrity of your download, please verify the checksum value. MD5: 2b13d3389ba8ce2c4e9d6ed8939b7b9c SHA1: 63472378d948923d2e17fca3ee8455a510d16b65 SHA-256: 0ec4543e5a993a633294de5d3efa40fc58a2ddaedc19fb3449051e87382c27ed
0 notes
Text
AMD: disponibile il nuovo Radeon Pro Software for Enterprise
AMD annuncia oggi la disponibilità di una nuova versione del suo AMD Radeon Pro Software for Enterprise 19.Q2, che offre ai designer, agli utenti CAD e ai professionisti della creatività la certificazione Day-Zero per 750 applicazioni mission-critical e le prestazioni necessarie per gestire anche i flussi di lavoro più complessi.
Il nuovo Radeon Pro Software for Enterprise è progettato per rispondere anche alle esigenze di professionisti che operano in settori diversi, dagli IT manager che hanno la necessità di aggiornare i software aziendali per garantire la sicurezza dei dispositivi a chi lavora in mobilità anche in ambienti difficili, il nuovo software per le schede grafiche Radeon Pro consente di accedere a diverse nuove funzionalità, tra cui:
Multitasking senza compromettere le prestazioni: oggi in ambienti professionali il multitasking è la norma e il nuovo Radeon Pro Software for Enterprise 19.Q2 offre a chi utilizza GPU Radeon Pro performance incredibili anche in scenari particolarmente esigenti. Mentre soluzioni analoghe della concorrenza incorrono in una riduzione delle performance del 39% se sottoposte a uno stress test con SPECviewperf 13 e Prime95 in background, le prestazioni della Radeon Pro WX 4100 rimangono costanti, con una flessione appena dell’1% circa;
Performance elevate per flussi di lavoro reali: i professionisti della creatività devono affrontare nuove sfide per realizzare progetti più complessi che mai. Le schede grafiche Radeon Pro offrono prestazioni elevate in applicazioni CAD come SOLIDWORKS, con la Radeon Pro WX 4100 in grado superare le performance della NVIDIA Quadro P1000 del 25% e la Radeon Pro WX 7100 più veloce della NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 del 28% in test di 3D modeling e del 51% circa in Siemens NX 10.0;
Supporto per design mission critical: AMD Radeon Pro Software for Enterprise ha ottenuto oltre 750 certificazioni ISV dall’inizio dell’AMD Day Zero Certification Program ed è già pronto per supportare il May 2019 Update di Windows 10;
Potenza da workstation anche in mobilità: lavorare in mobilità è un must per i professionisti di oggi, AMD Remote Workstation consente di accedere all’esperienza di uso tipica di una workstation con GPU dedicata da ogni luogo del mondo senza avere cali nelle prestazioni, come dimostrano i risultati del benchmark SPECviewperf 13 “3dsmax-06” con l’accesso da remoto a una workstation con GPU AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100;
Novità dei driver Radeon Software Adrenalin 2019 Edition: per rispondere alle esigenze dei professionisti che utilizzano schede Radeon Pro per creare videogiochi, AMD ha aggiornato le opzioni dei driver del Radeon Pro Software, che oggi offrono la possibilità di installare in maniera semplice i driver Radeon Software Adrenalin 2019 Edition anche su GPU professionali. AMD ha inoltre introdotto funzionalità per lo streaming a Radeon Pro ReLive, la sua soluzione professionale di screen capture e registrazione presente nel Radeon Pro Software.
Puoi trovare maggiori informazioni su queste e altre funzionalità del nuovo Radeon Pro Software for Enterprise 19.Q2 nel blog post a questo indirizzo.
È possibile scaricare i nuovi driver da qui: https://www.amd.com/en/support
0 notes
Photo
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000/6000 Teardown & Review
http://www.coolpc.com.tw/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=253720
Quadro RTX 6000: TU102-875-A1, 12x Samsung 16Gb 14Gbps GDDR6 (K4ZAF325BM-HC14), 8+6-pin PCIe power connector
VRM 12+3: Vgpu: PWM uP9512P, 12x FDMF3170 SPS (70A); Vmem: PWM uP9512P, 3x FDMF3170 SPS (70A)
Quadro RTX 5000: TU104-875-A1, 8x Samsung 16Gb 14Gbps GDDR6 (K4ZAF325BM-HC14), 8+6-pin PCIe power connector
VRM 8+2: Vgpu: PWM uP9512P, 8x FDMF3160 SPS (60A); Vmem: PWM uP9512P, 2x FDMF3160 SPS (60A)
Benchmarks (Quadro line):
TensorFlow(v1.10, mixed precision): RTX6000 vs RTX5000 vs GV100 vs GP100
RandomControl Arion Benchmark: RTX6000, RTX5000, GV100
SPECwpc v2.1 Benchmark: RTX6000, RTX5000, GV100
SPECviewperf 13 (1080p): RTX6000, RTX5000, GV100
SPECviewperf 13 (2160p): RTX6000, RTX5000
AIDA 64 GPGPU Benchmark: RTX6000 & 5000, GV100
Geek3D FurMark v1.20.1.0: RTX6000 76°C, RTX5000 75°C, GV100 82°C
0 notes
Text
драйвера на видеокарту nvidia geforce 9600 gso 384 мб
драйвера на видеокарту nvidia geforce 9600 gso 384 мб
———————————————————
>>> Получить файл <<<
——————————————————— Все ок! Администрация рекомендует ———————————————————
GeForce 9655GT 567mb начала показывать артефакты после простого выключения компа, в диспетчере задач висел восклицательный знак, устройство не использовало ресурсов и Запуск устройства невозможен (с кодом 65). Жарил в электрической духовке, сначала разогрел её вместе с видюхой на 55 градусах около 65 минут, затем сразу поставил на 775 (медленно очень разогревается духовка), потом сбавил до 655, выключил полностью и ушёл на полчаса. После прожарки идеально завелась, посмотрим сколько продержится. Автор, большое тебе спасибо! =) ## Драйвера для Видеокарт Сисадмин, ну уж извините, я понимаю, каково вам. Но по крайней мере это бесплатный и относительно быстрый способ, не выходя из дома так сказать ### ��рограммы для установки драйверов на компьютер скачать кстати народ у меня такой вопрос,возможно ли возникновение артефактов в играх не от перегрева а от того что нет термопасты и шары на которых держится проц отлипаются? слепаются после прогрева чипа и все что я тестировал игру Мафия 7 при оборотах кулера 655% температура была в игре гдето 55-65 градусов,но артефакты всерамно пошли,соответственно ето не от перегрева,если нанести термопасту ситуация изменится? #### Не работает мышь на компьютере - почему компьютерная мышка Примечание: на блоге есть статья: « Драйвера не хотят устанавливаться? Давайте им поможем », возможно, что в ней вы найдете ответ на свой вопрос. К сожалению длина запроса ограничена 85 символами, поэтому если название из диспетчера устройств слишком длинное, Вам придется укоротить запрос. (до целого слова в конце запроса) Сегиш, кажется ей скоро пора отправится в печь. Симптомы как раз на это намекают. У меня тоже были зависания в играх 676 намертво 687 .<> В целом я думаю что уже можно жарить. Главное осторожно СПААСИИБААА АВТОРУ!!!!!!!!!!!!!<> пожарил сегодня свою Focsconn Nvidia Geforse 9855 GTX<> Всёё заработало!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<> assassins creed 7 и .:зов припяти идут на максимальных настрой ках!<> Тока я кожух снял и кулер добавил. Принесли на ремонт комп с видюхой ASUS 9655 GT. Проблема та-же. Артефакты. Дрова не становятся, сразу синий экран. Решение одно жарить. Но решил сделать намного благороднее. Грел утюгом. Вокруг подложил лист асбеста, чтоб не нагревать все вокруг. Температуру мерил мультиметром через термопару. Температуру утюга по мультиметру довел до 765 градусов. Больше утюг не потянул, при 765 отключается. 6 час остывания, сборка, паста под радиатор и запуск. И о чудо шайтан запустился ! Я был рад. Реально рабочий способ хоть и сам сейчас понимаю что звучит дико ! Спасибо этому сайту ! Сразу следует оговориться, что результаты, показанные ускорителями в SPECviewperf, не стоит воспринимать слишком буквально. Многие приложения, чья работа моделируется в этом бенчмарке, устарели, поэтому реальные испытания в новых версиях этих пакетов могут выдавать совершенно иные результаты. Кроме того, производительность профессиональных ускорителей достигла сегодня такого уровня, что показатели в ряде тестов определяются отнюдь не мощностью видеокарты, а процессором, который оказывается узким местом в системе. Яркой иллюстрацией этого утверждения могут выступить результаты тестов 8dsmax-59 и ensight-58.<> Здравствуйте. Буквально вчера мышь работала исправно. Сегодня компьютер не может обнаружить её. Лампочка горит, но когда я её двигаю или нажимаю кнопки, то ничего не происходит. Такая ситуация с беспроводной, проводной, шариковой и с разъёмами USB, PS7. На других компьютерах всё замечательно. Можно ли это как нибудь исправить?
0 notes
Photo

AMD Vega FE reviews disappoint fans with humdrum gaming performance Enlarge The first reviews and benchmarks have arrived for the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition—the first graphics card based on AMD's Vega architecture—and the results are mixed to say the least. In professional application benchmarks like SPECviewperf and Cinebench R15 OpenGL, the £1000/$1000 Vega FE (buy here) comes out ahead... Read entire story. Source: Ars Technica
0 notes
Photo

AMD Vega FE reviews disappoint fans with humdrum gaming performance
Enlarge The first reviews and benchmarks have arrived for the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition—the first graphics card based on AMD's Vega architecture—and the results are mixed to say the least. In professional application benchmarks like SPECviewperf and Cinebench R15 OpenGL, the £1000/$1000...
Read More: http://www.sogogames.com/2017/07/03/amd-vega-fe-reviews-disappoint-fans-with-humdrum-gaming-performance/
0 notes