#anti harassment

[allsebaciel]

Ur disgusting LOL leave those of us w ocd/pocd and other disorders out of your nasty shit, you are not protecting us, you do not speak for us. One of the things we're taught abt our intrusive thoughts is NOT to give into them, educate yourself on this shit before opening your fucking mouth.

You've come to the wrong guy and I will use your ridiculously stupid take to educate my followers on POCD and OCD overall.

I have severe OCD & in a relationship with someone who has POCD. Anti rhetoric and anti spaces nearly made my partner kill themselves. So, how about you shut the fuck up?

Anti rhetoric = thought police rhetoric. It will always harm people with OCD. You are not protecting anyone.

The first thing that you should be taught about intrusive thoughts is that they are just thoughts. Intrusive thoughts are not reflections of yourself, your identity, personality, and self. They are not reality, they are thoughts that harm no one but the person who has them. Intrusive thoughts are not urges. Intrusive thoughts are not pleasant and not something you need to be scared of having. If someone taught you that your intrusive thoughts need to be policed and you are a bad person for having them - they wish you ill.

Educate yourself and reflect on the community you surround yourself with before you talk to me.

[space-dorito]

On today's episode of antis 📺

Antis try not to dump on artists challenge ( impossible ) there is rule34 on almost all cartoons / anime why are they acting surprised that artists make cartoon porn ? They wouldn't survive on old tumblr or old deviant art 💀 ~ ☆

[al-selfships]

The "if you don't want to get harassed, don't post your weird shit online" take has to be among the ones I hate the most. You're telling me I have to post "normal" stuff (whatever that means) or else the harassment is justified? That the one in the right is the person sending threats? That I can't even have a space for myself online? For fuck's sake.

[proudproship]

I've seen a surge of antis calling themselves punk/alt, and I just wanna make this clear:

Book-burning conservatives are not punk, sorry... :/

[vivi-ships]

Do y'all remember when this was a normal thing to see all over the place? Because I do. I remember seeing and posting this image everywhere when I was like 12-15.

[xx-slug-xx]

Ao3 authors, please learn to not insult people and be “morally superior” in the tags

Instead of tagging “noncon is gross” or “not noncon because that’s problematic”, for example, just put “enthusiastic consent” or “consensual sex” in the tags. It makes things a whole lot easier for people to filter and know what’s going on.

I really don’t care that you think noncon fics are bad or whatever, I (and many others) will be more likely to read your fic about two boys who are deeply in love if you aren’t an ass about your morals in fiction :/

[sparkling-pink-lemonade]

Saw a post of an anti saying that they are leaving AO3, as they are too uncomfortable to post their fics there now. The reason? They found out one of their long time readers was a proshipper, despite their fics having proship dni. And how "that includes silent readers too, I don't want you all looking at my content."

My brother in christ, you are posting on the fiction freedom site. The proshipping site. Dnis aren't god damn restraining orders. They are one tool in helping you display your boundaries. It's still on you to enforce your boundaries. You post something publicly, you forfeit your ability to regulate who can view your work. If you're obsessive enough, you can regulate who actually interacts with your work by stalking each person in the kudos list, comments, or bookmarks and then blocking snyone you don't like, but you do not get a say on who may silently read your posts. Not unless you private your work and only show it to specific people.

And if you don’t want proshippers to interact, get off the profic site.

[justproshiprants]

I really don't get the, "But a kid could see this and think it's okay!" Because it comes with so many infuriating assumptions.

Why is a kid looking at something that explicitly isn't for them? Why is the creator of said content responsible for that when they properly tagged it and told minors to not interact? Why is someone who's making content not meant for minors responsible for teaching minors that incest and grooming are bad, when that's something a kid should've been taught already?

I'd argue there's a lot more fucked up and traumatizing stuff on the internet than someone's "weird" or "problematic" ship art.

[obianakin]

some of you really aren’t gonna like this, but a creator’s wishes should never dictate what fan content is produced for a piece of media.

in the past, authors like anne rice have tried to limit the production of fanfiction. but at least rice was honest - she thought this infringed on her copywrite. back in the day, this was considered a valid argument to not create any fanfiction at all for her works.

do you understand what i’m saying? while you may sound valiant for placing a creator’s “discomfort” above the fan’s natural proclivities in fandom, really you’re just continuing to advocate for censorship in fan spaces.

and for anyone who is a creator, or who wants to become one - get comfortable with the rules of the internet. there will be erotic content made of your characters, there will be weird AUs made with your characters. there will be strange pairings and headcanons, no matter if you interact religiously with the fans or not. you cannot stop people from connecting with and wanting to be creative with your characters.

[fixing-bad-posts]

[Image description: A photo of a blue-eyed cat, looking at the camera. Cut-up style text is overlaid to read, "'outing' somebody for being gay or trans is gross as hell. consider being anti harassment".]

---

"outing" somebody for being gay or trans is gross as hell. consider being anti harassment :3

[cemitadepollo]

Some of you aren't being progressive as you think you are.

[proudproship]

"NO WAY PEOPLE SHIP THESE !!!" or "NO WAY SOMEONE MADE NSFW OF THIS CHARACTER!!!"

rule 34 of the internet, dude.

[cyb3r-s1lly]

I miss when I was younger and I could say to my friends at school "omg I love sebaciel and the hitachin twins are so cute" and NO ONE WOULD BAT AN EYE. If someone tried to just say that openly now they'd get accused of being a pedophile or condoning abuse or some weird shit like that. Please take me back to 2016 I miss it so much I miss when people felt free and were able to enjoy fiction the way they wanted without having to live in fear if being harassed.

[proshippy-fox]

do you think antis would call adam and eve problematic because eve was made from adam's rib so it's kind of incest or

[adeptushours]

I hate when people refer to antis as "normies" because it's not normal to tell people to off themselves over fiction

[xx-slug-xx]

“Your fantasies equal your real life desires”

I’m fucking asexual? I have no desire to do anything I fantasize about irl. Same with a shit ton of other people who are aspec?

Tbh, I think it’s just queerphobic, specifically aphobic but other shit too, to say “your fantasies are what you want irl.

It’s not just aspecs either. I know a fuck ton of lesbians who fantasize about fictional men. They are not any less lesbians because of their fantasies though.

I could go on with more about how it’s a stupid argument, and even how it’s ableist in certain contexts, but I’ll save that for other posts lmao