#françois civil gifs

[whumpypepsigal]

Burn Out (2017): “Stay with me, stay with me.”

[mockingjaysongbird]

FRANCOIS CIVIL is D'Artagnan in Les Trois Mousquetaires (2023)

[dagonet]

Les Trois Mousquetaires : D'Artagnan (2023) réal. Martin Bourboulon

[thorin-is-a-cuddler]

✨ The Three Musketeers 2023 and friendship ✨

[behindfairytales]

FRANÇOIS CIVIL est CHARLES D'ARTAGNAN Les Trois Mousquetaires : D'Artagnan (2023) | Bande d'annonce officielle

[wiha-jun]

FRANÇOIS CIVIL

BAC NORD (dir. Cédric Jimenez, 2020)

[harleystuff]

François Civil Gif Pack

[LINK] In this gif pack you will find 330 gifs (275*167) of François Civil as Rémy Pelletier in ‘Deux moi / Someone, somewhere (2019)’.  I made these gifs from scratch, so please don’t claim them as your own and do not repost them in gif hunts (instead link back to this page). You may crop/use them in crackships & stuff, but please don’t forget the credit ! (& since I’m kinda curious, I’d very much like to see :p) Likes and reblogs are appreciated!

Content warning : semi-nudity, kissing

[brenda-panicstation]

© PANIC STATION François Civil (gifs)

[queenofdestiny]

Let's talk about The Three Musketeers (Spoiler free)

Okay so recently I saw the new The Three Musketeers film and I really wanted to promote it here because it's hella good.

The actors really are good (Aramis is my favorite, the man is truly hot) and the backgrounds are beautiful. It's a french film and part of it was filmed in Versailles if I'm not mistaken.

Plus the lines are great I mean I can't talk for the English version but in french you've got some great lines and verbal joust which I absolutely love.

So I present you Aramis

Milady

and Athos

I won't show you the others because I don't wanna spoil but I strongly recommend to go watch it because it's great.

[le-brol]

[akaneisorange]

Feeling like loving François Civil's smile today 🥹❤️

[actorsinunderwear]

François Civil and Benjamin Lavernhe in Love at Second Sight (2019)

[spiderliliez]

Joséphine Japy (as Olivia Marigny) François Civil (as Raphaël Ramisse) Scenes from the French fantasy-drama MON INCONNUE (2019) [+] Joséphine [GIF Collection] 🌸 [+] ..more French Films 🎬

[nuadox]

Let’s base AI debates on reality, not extreme fears about the future

- By Fenwick McKelvey , Concordia University , The Conversation -

A recent open letter by computer scientists and tech industry leaders calling for a six-month ban on artificial intelligence development has received widespread attention online. Even Canada’s Innovation Minister François-Philippe Champagne has responded to the letter on Twitter.

The letter, published by the non-profit Future of Life Institute, has asked for all AI labs to stop training AI systems more powerful than GPT-4, the model behind ChatGPT. The letter argues that AI has been “locked in an out-of-control race to develop and deploy ever more powerful digital minds that no one — not even their creators — can understand, predict, or reliably control.”

The letter assumes AI is becoming, or could become, “powerful digital minds” — a longtermist interpretation of AI’s development that ignores important debates about AI today in lieu of future concerns.

Longtermism and AI

Longtermism is the belief that artificial intelligence poses long-term or existential risks to humanity’s future by becoming an out-of-control superintelligence.

Worries about superintelligent AIs are usually the stuff of science fiction. AI fantasies are one of many fears in Silicon Valley that can lead to dark prophecies. But like the Torment Nexus meme, these worries translate into major investment not caution. Most major technology firms have cut their responsible AI teams.

ChatGPT is obviously not a path to superintelligence. The open letter sees AI language technology like ChatGPT as a cognitive breakthrough — something that allows an AI to compete with humans at general tasks. But that’s only one opinion.

There are many others that see ChatGPT, its GPT-4 model and other language learning models as “stochastic parrots” that merely repeat what they learn online so they appear intelligent to humans.

Superintelligence’s blind spots

Longtermism has direct policy implications that prioritize superintelligence over more pressing matter such as AI’s power imbalances. Some proponents of longtermism even consider regulation to stop superintelligence more urgent than addressing the climate emergency.

AI policy implications are immediate, not far off matters. Because GPT-4 is trained on the entire internet and has expressly commercial ends, it raises questions about fair dealing and fair use.

We still don’t know if AI-generated texts and images are copyrightable in the first place, since machines and animals cannot hold copyright.

And when it comes to privacy matters, ChatGPT’s approach is hard to distinguish from another AI application, Clearview AI. Both AI models were trained using massive amounts of personal information collected on the open internet. Italy’s data-protection authority has just banned ChatGPT over privacy concerns.

These immediate risks are left unmentioned in the open letter, which swings between wild philosophy and technical solutions, ignoring the issues that are right in front of us.

Drowning out pragmatism

The letter follows an old dynamic that my co-author and I identify in a forthcoming peer-reviewed chapter about AI governance. There is a tendency to view AI as either an existential risk or something mundane and technical.

The tension between these two extremes is on display in the open letter. The letter begins by claiming “advanced AI could represent a profound change in the history of life on Earth” before calling for “robust public funding for technical AI safety research.” The latter suggests the social harms of AI are merely technical projects to be solved.

The focus on these two extremes crowds out important voices trying to pragmatically discuss the immediate risks of AI mentioned above as well as labour issues and more.

The attention being given to the open letter is especially problematic in Canada because two other letters, written by artists and civil liberties organizations, have not received the same amount of attention. These letters call for reforms and a more robust approach to AI governance to protect those being affected by it.

An unneeded distraction toward AI legislation

Government responses to the open letter have stressed that Canada does have legislation — the Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA). The longterm risks of AI are being used to rush legislation now like AIDA.

AIDA is an important step toward a proper AI governance regime, but it needs to better consult with those affected by AI before being implemented. It cannot be rushed to respond to perceived longterm fears.

The letter’s calls to rush AI legislation might end up advantaging the same few firms driving AI research today. Without time to consult, enhance public literacy and listen to those being affected by AI, AIDA risks passing on AI’s accountability and auditing to institutions already well positioned to benefit from the technology, creating a market for a new AI auditing industry.

Humanity’s fate might not be on the line, but AI’s good governance certainly is.

Fenwick McKelvey, Associate Professor in Information and Communication Technology Policy, Concordia University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

--

Read Also

Chinese government to restrict the use of AI chatbots

[behindfairytales]

FRANÇOIS CIVIL est CHARLES D'ARTAGNAN Les Trois Mousquetaires (2023) | Teaser officiel

[wiha-jun]

FRANÇOIS CIVIL

BAC NORD (dir. Cédric Jimenez, 2020)