Tumgik
#hopey art
furriey · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
THAT IS...... DOROHEDORO !
(click for image desc.)
1K notes · View notes
hopefuladdictions · 2 months
Text
Idk if I ever posted this. I’m going to start slowly rolling out all my Akaza doodles for you guys <3
Tumblr media
He just woke up please be quiet. He is a little lost rn ❄️💕
63 notes · View notes
stevelieber · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
Looking at original art on the Heritage Auctions site sometimes takes you to a page like this, where my brain struggles to believe that someone just, like, OWNS it. "But… but… that's not an object someone can own- that's the first 18 years of Hopey's life."
117 notes · View notes
theblackestofsuns · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media
“Any Girl Other Than Hopey”
The Girl From H.O.P.P.E.R.S. (2007)
Jaime Hernandez
Fantagraphics Books
63 notes · View notes
tygerland · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
Artwork 1987 by Jaime Hernandez
339 notes · View notes
bandit-o-s-oc-arch · 2 years
Text
Sometimes you just gotta sketch some stuff out to get your brain working on art mode again -- two small sketches of some underseen(lately) OCS, ZME and Dianna.
Tumblr media
The former, Diana, has been giving me a big pain in my side for a moment now, something about her design makes it so hard to just figure her placement on the page.
Tumblr media
And ZME was honestly just an attempt to try and prove I didn't have artists block, her design is so complex tho that I honestly shouldn't attempt it at 4 am LOL.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
I try to avoid covering up my artistic process on here because especially for me I consider everything i work on leading up to a "final" piece a core component to that finished state, and also it annoys me to no end when people just post final stuff.
9 notes · View notes
batri-jopa · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
0 notes
friendswithclay · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media
“On the left are reproduced: at the top, a vase from 3,000 years B.C. from Hopei; a vase with green paintings from Kansu, a region to which we owe a large number of pottery of very refined workmanship. At the bottom, a vase of the Panshan style and a characteristic pottery dating from about 2000 BC and already presenting the pattern of stylized meanders that will be a constant of Chinese art in the following periods in bronzes and architectural decorations.”
From: “Le grand livre de l'archéologie” by Bosi, Roberto; 1982.
25 notes · View notes
hopeymchope · 1 year
Text
Just your standard tumblr blog manifesto
Hi! Whether you’re new to my dumb corner of Tumblr or a longer-term follower who just hasn’t particularly noticed (or cared) how I’m doing my thing here, I thought I should sum up my basic principles for this blog in a (somewhat?) useful fashion.  1) I try to always post spoiler tags for EVERY piece of official Danganronpa fiction before discussing any spoilery info OR sharing spoilery artwork. Why? Because it only takes a second to tag posts for people, and you never know who is new to the fandom/hasn’t gotten around to everything yet/is trying to still remain pure on certain subjects. For your spoiler-blocking needs, the tags for each are as follows:
Danganronpa: Trigger Happy Havoc (game/anime/manga) — #dr1 spoilers
Danganronpa 2: Goodbye Despair (game) — #dr2 spoilers
Danganronpa Another Episode: Ultra Despair Girls (game/manga) — #drae spoilers
Danganronpa 3: The End of Hope’s Peak Academy/High School (anime) — #dr3 spoilers
Danganronpa V3: Killing Harmony (game) — #drv3 spoilers
Ultimate Talent Development Plan (AU mode/sub-game within V3) — #utdp spoilers
Danganronpa Zero (light novels) — #dr0 spoilers
Danganronpa IF light novel — #drif spoilers
Ultra Despair Hagakure light novel  — #udh spoilers
Danganronpa Kirigiri light novels — #drk spoilers
Danganronpa Togami light novels  — #drt spoilers
Danganronpa S: Ultimate Summer Camp (game) — #drs spoilers
2) I reblog (and occasionally even do original posts of) A LOOOOT of fan art here, but I make it a point to only share things either posted by the original artist OR which are shared with the permission of the artist. I had it impressed upon me earlier in my Tumblr career that some artists legitimately don’t want their stuff shared on other sites without permission, and I try to always respect that. (And yes, I realize that just saying “permission obtained from the artist” or something is HARDLY a foolproof system. We’re on the honor system here; we can only assume such disclaimers are honest.) If you catch me sharing art that is copied or posted by someone other than the artist without any expressed permission, please let me know — I’ll take it down! 
3) I’ll almost always respond to asks submitted to me, but I’m sorry if it takes a while. I’m typically WAAAAY behind on such things. Sometimes it takes me a few days or even, rarely, weeks. Sometimes I just don’t know what to say at first. But sometimes I’ll respond ASAP because the ask is easy to answer or just ignites a bunch of thoughts within me. Or on rare occasions I’ll, uh, never answer because I couldn’t think of anything to really say (sorry?) or because the ask is basically just a troll. 
4) I sometimes post asks/commentary that are very critical of certain characters as people (as in, not criticizing them as fictional characters or how they were written; criticizing their behavior as good/bad people). If you don’t like seeing your faves harshed on, I tag those criticism/negativity-centric posts for easy blocking, too! So feel free to block tags like #anti-kokichi ouma or #anti-hiyoko saionji or whomever. (But let’s be honest; Those are the two most common ones.) 
5) This Tumblr originated as a Naegiri-focused one, actually. That’s not something that comes up too terribly often these days, but.. you can definitely still expect me to heap extra attention on any Naegiri-centric content I come across (or, in rare instances, create myself). :) So... that’s just a heads-up.  6) If you came across this user handle elsewhere and are wondering if this blog is run by the same person, I can only confirm that the Hopey McHope on AO3 and the HopeyMcHope on FF.net are, in fact, me. Anyone else you see by this name might be the same person as me, or it might not. I guess you should just ask me here.
7) If I blocked you... I probably assumed you’re a bot. If you don’t have ANY posts or ANY reblogs or ANY profile pic or ANY heading wallpaper? I have to assume you’re a bot; it’s a problem around here. If you’re not a bot, please do something, anything to make your account look like a real person’s. Say two words on your blog, change your blog title to be ANYTHING else, give yourself a profile pic or even a header image that ISN’T the default... just, anything. 
19 notes · View notes
kingdom-net · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
OPEN THE GATE
Hello Kingmakers!
This is Admin Hopey coming to you with a question!
As with most groups, between comebacks a cold silence often rolls over content creation, especially since there are so many fun summer comebacks happening right now! 
Of course that’s not a problem, I am loving all the summer comebacks and enjoying them just as much as you, but I was thinking...
Would anyone be interested in doing a Kingdom revival?? I would post a week’s worth of content prompts and during the month of July (if you feel so inclined) you could make content for those prompts using gifs/gfx/art! 
I won’t do it if there’s no interest, so I’m just reaching out right now to the lovely ccs who have contributed to this network to feel out the waters. 
If you are interested, please reply to this post or drop me an ask confirming that you are interested! And if you could, please boost this post so it can reach out to other Kingmaker ccs who may not know about the network! <3 
Thank you all so much, and I hope we can do this together! 
CLOSE THE GATE!
~ Admin Hopey
24 notes · View notes
furriey · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
my backspaCE keey isnt workingbut click for img desc. I want to chew on the old man folds on the back of kims neck...........................
353 notes · View notes
hopefuladdictions · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
I finished the WIP…. Everyone cheer.
My little messy eater…it’s all smeared….it’s dripping…it’s on his nose…. He’s showing off his teeth….. I love him. Anyways, here, enjoy finished Akaza drawing!!
45 notes · View notes
rptv1 · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
Maggie and Hopey, art from 10 Years of Love and Rockets
By Jaime (Xaime) Hernandez
16 notes · View notes
theblackestofsuns · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
"Hopey Monsters"
Perla La Loca (2007)
Jaime Hernandez
Fantagraphics Books
7 notes · View notes
tangledupinhope · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media
Hello from Hope
I did some experimenting with this piece! Bigger canvas, pen size, and tried out a line art technique from Sleepychi! Not sure how often I'll do lineart like this, but I found it fun! Hope on Toyhouse
Posted using PostyBirb
5 notes · View notes
Text
This is Part 2 of the series, Part 1 can be found here:
Due Diligence and Art
You cannot contract for a crime, but you CAN write a contract for it! Ask me how.
An attorney once told me “you cannot contract for a crime”. I think this is very true, and I think ultimately the truth will prevail. In the meantime, let’s talk about the art of writing contracts for giving future crimes appearance of lawful acts. Here is a lesson brought to you by your government-military-industrial complex…
Read more
8 days ago · 247 likes · 170 comments · Sasha Latypova
The “Technical Direction Letter” can be found here, it’s 35 p. long, partially redacted.
Due Diligence and Art is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Upgrade to paid
This contract is now a famous document that was used by Pfizer in their Motion to Dismiss Brook Jackson’s case under False Claims Act. It is publicly available in a partially redacted form.
Important: understanding redactions!
Two types of redactions are used in this document, (b)(4) and (b)(6). Here is what they mean:
(b) (4)  Reveal information that would impair the application of state-of-the-art technology within a U.S. weapon system
(b) (6)  Reveal information, including foreign government information, that would cause serious harm to relations between the United States and a foreign government, or to ongoing diplomatic activities of the United States
In the Motion to Dismiss, Pfizer lawyers stated that the purpose of what the Government hired them to do was a “large scale manufacturing demo”. In my opinion, that’s the correct interpretation of the SOW for covid countermeasures - a demo - a fakery by definition. It is stated right here on the front page, complete with the misspelling of Pfizer’s name. Ok, I know, the Army was in a hurry…to make many shots for all of us…
…by foreign agents? This letter is addressed to ATI, DOD’s mega-manager, a non-profit company managing untold billions in OTA contracts for the DOD. According to the type of redaction used, the personnel of ATI mentioned in this letter: Sr. Contracts Manager, Agreements Specialist and Agreements Officer - all appear to be foreign agents: their names are redacted with (b) (6).
This document is also referred to as a “Statement of Work”, i.e. a description of a specific project that will be implemented under a previously established “umbrella” contract (Base Agreement discussed in the Part 1 of this series).
I have written about the role of DOD in “covid countermeasures” contracts previously here:
Due Diligence and Art
Reviewing the DOD Contracts for Covid "Countermeasures"
A reader asked me why I am “absolving Pfizer and Moderna from liability”? I am not, and I never did, and never implied such a thing. All pharmas, and not just pharmas - all “non-traditional” defense contractors (this includes 100’s of companies and academic institutions) taking blood money to develop, make, distribute and deploy biowarfare agents on c…
Read more
2 months ago · 380 likes · 278 comments · Sasha Latypova
I will discuss in more detail several sections from Pfizer’s Technical Direction Letter as they reveal the true purpose of this project, and how it fits into the US government-military-pharma-academia deadly “biosecurity” scam. Emphasis mine.
SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION, SCOPE, AND OBJECTIVES
This section is full of both, fuzzy hopey-dopey and ominous language:
“State-of-the-art” - are we talking about medicines? The definition of this word is something technologically cutting edge, advanced and up to the minute. It’s appropriate in describing new cool tech, latest gadgets and, yes, the latest weapons, too. In medicine, however, the latest and up to the minute product is THE RISKIEST, and thus least desired as a first line of therapy. Every non-brainwashed, experienced doctor knows that in medicine the preference is always for things that have been in use for decades vs. those newly introduced. The new tech is only really desired if everything else had been tried, has failed, and the situation is desperate or terminal. That’s because safety profiles of drugs cannot be fully evaluated even by well-conducted large clinical trials, and it often takes decades to characterize the product’s long-term safety. Certainly, this was not the case with covid illness. Safe, effective, well characterized, used for decades medicines have demonstrated efficacy and were immediately suppressed, censored, banned and otherwise excluded from use by the public health authorities.
“Capable of providing protection” - based on what? How would anyone know what is medically protective without careful, evidence based long term testing? No terms are defined (no definition section in this SOW, and these terms are also not defined in any other related documents).
The contract writers state over and over that this is a “prototype project”. In fact the word “prototype” is mentioned in this contract 22 times. Here is a quote from Section 1.3 Objective:
Prototypes, prototype projects, and demonstrations of prototype large scale manufacturing. Got it. Very clear.
There is an interesting sub-section in Section 1 - Section 1.1.2. It describes what happens “without Government funding”:
A. Regulatory Planning
B. Clinical And Regulatory Approach
C. Chemistry Manufacturing Controls (CMC).
It is a peculiar sub-section. Contracts and statements of work are typically written to describe what deliverables are expected when and in exchange for how much money/value. They do not typically include what happens outside of the contract, as it is not relevant to the contracted trade. The “without Government funding” section, however, takes 5 out of 35 pages of this contract (p. 3-8) I will explain why below.
Here are some excerpts with my notes:
Note: This simply says “FDA regulations exist”, and Pfizer/BioNTech will plan to comply with them. This is in a section titled “the Government has nothing to do with this”, and for avoidance of doubt they are stating that the Army Medical Research regulations DO NOT APPLY either.
Note: In this part they talk about various meetings with pharma regulators that BioNTech and Pfizer attended, including meetings with the FDA, German and Chinese regulators. That’s nice. Business people went to many meetings…
Note: (b)(4) redactions in very interesting locations. 100M doses of [redacted words] that would, if unredacted, impair the application of the “state-of-the-art tech” in weapon systems. Why redact with (b) (4) if it were really a pharmaceutical vaccine? So, is this a “vaccine” or a state-of-the art weapons system?
This section continues on and on, multiple pages describing formulation activities, sourcing, stability testing, manufacturing quality controls, yada-yada-yada. Many (b) (4) redactions throughout.
Note: Again a very interesting redaction with (b) (4) - something that precedes drug substance development, if unredacted, this will impair the application of state-of-the art tech in weapons systems.
By now it should be abundantly clear that the US DOD is ordering weapons systems from Pfizer. Take a minute to think about what this means…
Let me explain the purpose of the “stuff that happens without Government funding” section of the contract:
The contract is under Other Transaction Authority contracting method. Under OTA, the DOD can only order prototypes (not complete functional products, especially not properly developed and tested pharmaceuticals). For properly developed, tested and approved medicines they would have to use normal regulated contracting, which would be a bummer as they obviously need the the secrecy of the OTA for this project. To use OTA, the DOD has to engage “non-traditional defense contractors”, meaning companies that have not sold anything to the DOD during prior 12 months. That’s the authorized scope of OTA - its stated purpose is for one-off, relatively small (less than 1 year) projects around things like novel prototypes that may not be available from established contractors. That’s a problem for the DOD. They want to keep buying secret stuff in large steady volumes from the same crony companies, instead of looking for newbie vendors every 12 months. So, the DOD uses an OTA loophole which allows them to “cost-share” if the company is an established defense contractor (like Pfizer). Also, a long term lucrative relationship with the DOD is much more likely to keep vendors highly cooperative and never questioning the scope of work, or walking away from the deal.
Then on p. 8, the DOD states that the items in the previous 5 pages of yada-yada-blah-blah about FDA clinical, regulatory and manufacturing compliance you just read are OUT OF SCOPE of this contract.
To be sure, cost-sharing is a common practice in contracting for R&D collaborations, and I have negotiated several agreements that included elements of cost-sharing. Here is why the DOD “cost-share” is a smokescreen - in legitimate contract practice, when the contract includes cost sharing between the parties, all cost elements that are being shared are IN THE SCOPE of the contract. If those elements are excluded from scope - it is not cost sharing. Those are activities irrelevant to the contract. Which, in fact, is the truth: the FDA regulations were at the time and continue to remain irrelevant to the mRNA/DNA injections. Because they are not pharmaceuticals, but weapons.
The DOD contract writers cleverly dumped all the activities related to the FDA regulatory and cGMP, i.e. anything that a proper pharmaceutical product would have to comply with, into a fake “cost-sharing” category, and then excluded them from the scope of the contract!
Finally, I am including comments from a reader, because they describe well what this statement of work for $2B really is - a fraud on all of us. A document written (intentionally in my opinion) in a confusing, contradictory and non-enforceable way to defraud not the government (the government wrote it), but all of us, the people:
by Robert Kernodle
I agree completely with Robert.
To conclude this lesson in writing contracts for crimes: By now it should be clear that in this contract the Government is fraudulently utilizing OTA, its loopholes, intentionally confusing and contradictory language, liability waivers and other techniques for the purpose of:
ordering state-of-the-art weapons systems disguised as “vaccines” from Pfizer, with help of foreign agents (ATI staff).
This contract is written intentionally to conceal these facts, and is using expert knowledge and sophistication to do so. People who have made decisions to implement this crime through these mechanisms must be investigated and prosecuted. To be continued.
Art for today: Snow, oil on panel, 12x16 in.
1 note · View note