Wow! 👏👏👏 JDEadonWriter on X, put this amazing post out today. Check this out!
Are Meghan Markle's kids FAKE? 🤔
Megnant
1 Size: Bump drastically altering in size, even in a single day 😯
2 Slip: Bump slipped down to her knees in Birkenhead, UK 😯
3 Wobble: Bump wobbled side-to-side as she crossed the street. 😯
4 Clutching: Supporting her bump with her hands overly often. 🤔
5 Popping: audibly popped in a video, and wafted her clothes😯
6 Shape: Bump unnaturally shaped on Netflix🤔
7 Straps: Moonbump straps outlines visible under clothing in several photos. And something snapped, impacting the clothing fabric (video of H&M in London)😯
8 Biology: An absence of swelling of ankles, and other subtle biological (non)signs.🤔
9 Holding: Carrying a (doll?) infant on her bump, instead of on her hip.🤔
10 Squats: Squatting, effortlessly, with her knees together in videos and photos. In heels.😯
Births
11 Announcements: Royal official birth announcements are indirect. One states they are delighted "by the news of the" (not by the actual) birth.🤔
12 Coverup? A medic who certified a birth closed down her practice shortly afterwards.😯
13 Certificates: Questions linger over the birth certificates signatures, etc.🤔
14 Leak: An official Royal twitter account tweet indicated that Meghan’s kids are fake, before being taken down. An innocent prank?😁
15 Recovery: Epidural (ouch!) birth in a bath description anomalies and arriving home too soon afterwards to be quite plausible.🤔
16 Born Of Body?: Meghan allegedly told a friend she was infertile, when at college, and there was a reported alleged hysterectomy before the births.
17 Silence: Meghan is silent on her claimed births, despite always flashing her bump; having a "Capacity for over sharing"; boasting about being a “Mom”, and always talking about herself (apparently) on her feminist podcast. 🤔
Rented Infants
18 Archie Model: The real parents of the infant predominantly shown in Archie photos are identified. 💥
19 Lilibet Model: Parents of the infant shown in Lilibet photos are identified.💥
20 Loan: Mother of “Lilibet” commented on Insta that she does not "loan" her daughter to Meghan any longer.😯
21 Shape-Shifting: Different infants used in photos of both Archie and Lilibet.😯
22 Photoshopping: A litany of incompetently-photoshopped “family” photos. (A huge topic in itself).🤔
Dolls
23 Reborn Doll: Seemingly cradling a doll (a product called Darren) in official photo of Archie 🪆
24 Party Doll: Meghan seemingly cradled a similar doll when gate-crashing a polo match party, begetting astonished looks.😯
25 Bumpy Ride: Meghan seemed to be lugging an inanimate doll on top of her bump through some woods in Canada. Whilst grinning at a hired pap.🪆
26 Twisted: In one photograph, Archie's head is twisted more than 90 degrees 🪆
27 Carrying: A high % of photographs show them carrying the “kids” 🪆
28 Backs-Turned: A high % of Photos are of kids facing away from the camera 🤔
Other Oddities
29 Website: A startling absence of updates of Royal website on Meghan’s offspring.🤔
30 Bishop: Los Angeles christening cleric was not the official Bishop the Harkles claimed he was.🤔
31 Implausible Platitudes: Claiming Archie’s first word was “Crocodile”, and that he demands a Leica camera for his birthday. As tots do...🤔
32 Merch: An uncharacteristic unwillingness to merchandise their kids, for $$$ or PR.🤔
33 Invisible: The Harkles are never seen with their kids. There are hints of "home schooling" (will they ever be allowed out?)😯
34 Family Holidays: Weirdly, the Harkles never take their kids on holiday, and, if they pretend they did, they incompetently photoshop them into pap snaps on Insta.🤔
35 Everything Else: All the stuff I overlooked in this hastily speed-typed list.🤔
🤔🤔🤔
Why does it matter? 🤔
Because rich Prince Harry wants we skint, long-suffering tax payers, to pay for his security expenses; he’s a traitor, and, well, it’s fraud, isn’t it? 💥
Feel free to leave evidence I missed out in the comments. 👍
#MeghanMarkleIsAGrifter
#MeghanMarkleExposed
#WhereAreTheKids
#sussexbabyscam
151 notes
·
View notes
She really was convinced she was a star by u/aunt_bluann
She really was convinced she was a star
When H and M left royal duties behind, I think Meghan really believed that they would soar above the real royals. She had seen the huge and welcoming crowds, and really thought that the welcome was because she (and maybe even H) were just so amazing! She had proof now that she really was as special as she had always thought! It was true, people would have adored her all of her life if they had only known who she was! Yeah, well.The point has been made before. She was benefiting from the popularity of the royal family, not her own allure. Her personality type will never believe that, and we are now seeing that played out over and over. Her behavior proves to me that she thinks as long as she can get photos, video, etc. of her being her own unique and irresistible self, she will make headlines, make waves, make men desire her and women wish they could BE her. She obviously still thinks there's a chance. I don't know what it will take for her to finally understand: Meghan, it was never YOU who inspired the adulation. You have removed the one and only thing that made you interesting. Royalty. Sadly, in the whole process, we have all found out the type of person that she is. It was really something that should have been kept hidden, it's so unappealing. We'd never have found out if she hadn't insisted on foisting herself upon the world with her grabbiness, self-important speeches, her me, me, me, look at me attitude. Her pretensions of being an intellectual, a philanthropist, a person of substance. We might never have known what a phony she is if she'd just shut up and done her job.
post link: https://ift.tt/Bj39Gcr
author: aunt_bluann
submitted: November 16, 2023 at 11:36PM via SaintMeghanMarkle on Reddit
130 notes
·
View notes
Soooo… lately I’ve been seeing Meghan fans, most of whom work outside the film and TV industry, waxing at length about how Meghan needs to write a post or speak up about the strike and how it’s a “bad look” that she hasn’t. As a WGA member who’s been on the picket lines for way too many months, let me explain why you are wrong:
Since the strike began, WGA and now SAG-AFTRA have followed a very precise playbook regarding our messaging to the public about our goals and reasonings for the strike. This messaging is key to us achieving those goals. This messaging has largely been put into the mouths of smaller to medium visibility actors. No Leo DiCaprio or Ben Afflecks waxing on about the plight of the worker. The reasoning for that should be obvious—it plays right into the hands of the AMPTP, who would like nothing more than to portray the actors (and writers) as a bunch of wealthy whiners, millionaire champagne socialists glibly sticking it to the working class crew people that they’ve put out of work. They want to divide us and turn the public against us. What we want to get across is that we are largely working class folks as well. The best way to do that is to keep the bigger names from becoming the face of this action. Those folks have instead been encouraged to stay quiet and donate to the strike fund. And many have obliged—in fact a list of million plus dollar donors was just released.
This is all carefully crafted strategy and ITS WORKING! Try as they might, the producers haven’t been able to influence public opinion against us, the other unions still have our backs and the companies are slowly coming around to the realization that they may actually have to negotiate.
All this is to say, the very LAST thing we need is a literal princess,living in a million bathroom mansion with Oprah and Ellen as neighbors, to pipe up with even the most well intentioned of comments. That would be the opening the networks (and the press) is looking for to shift the conversation from the very real struggles of the working actor to all of the things that are regularly thrown at Meghan in the press. And suddenly, we’re off-message.
We don’t need a light shined on us. The public is aware of why we’re striking and is on our side, thus far. What we need to do is stay on message, which means the big names continue to stay quiet and the regular actors who make up the bulk of the union get to talk. It’s helpful when the Suits writers reveal how little they’re making in residuals from all the streams the show is getting on Netflix. It would NOT be helpful for Meghan to carry that same message, because then all the venom and dismissiveness and mockery that gets thrown her way will now be directed at the strike.
So please stop encouraging her to speak or write about the strike. Don’t try to rethink our strategy for us. I’m sure Meghan is doing her part behind the scenes. And behind the scenes is exactly where we need her to be.
Thank you for your time,
A tired but resolute TV writer
73 notes
·
View notes
I was today years old when I realized that Prince Harry and Meghan’s wedding anniversary (May 19th) is the same day as Queen Charlotte’s birthday. She’s buried at St. George’s Chapel and her son Prince Augustus Frederick was the first Duke of Sussex
Charlotte’s husband King George III also had a younger brother named Henry who married a commoner. She was thought of as “one of the great beauties of the age.” Prince Henry’s death date (Sept 18) is three days after Prince Harry’s birthday (Sept 15).
It goes even deeper—the first Duke of Sussex was apparently known for his progressive views and later fell out with his older brother George IV.
His union was annulled, so he never had a Duchess of Sussex. Prince Augustus Frederick was known for his liberal views, which included reform of Parliament and the abolition of the slave trade.
Queen Elizabeth knew what she was doing when she decided to make Harry the current Duke of Sussex.
89 notes
·
View notes
Meghan invited celebrity strangers to her wedding. Catherine included people she knew including the village post master, and stood by him during the post office scandal. This tells you everything
It’s the small things.
Many in the UK would by now be familiar with the British Post Office scandal, in which sub-post masters were wrongly accused of theft due to errors in the Horizon computer system. The scandal has gained public attention after the ITVx series Mr Bates Vs The Post Office premiered on the 1st of January. (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-56718036.amp)
One of those sub-post masters included shopkeeper Hasmukh Shingadia, who Catherine invited to her wedding along with his wife Chandrika.
Hasmukh recalls giving Doritos and Haribos to Kate and her sister Pippa when they were teenagers. Later he remembers Prince William himself popping by the store.
When Hasmukh was charged with theft, Catherine and her family stood by him and continued to buy at his store. Now his conviction is overturned along with many others. (https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thesun.co.uk/news/25303536/kate-middleton-stands-by-postmaster-scandal/amp/)
I cannot imagine Meghan deigning to recognise a village shopkeeper. She didn’t even invite her family or any of her childhood friends, instead choosing to fill the seats with celebrities she barely knew and who hardly acknowledge her now.
How empty her and Harry’s life must be! They have to buy their way in to events. There is nothing real in their lives; no connection to people. All I see is a love of all things material and superficial.
What they can’t buy is a good reputation and the love of people around them. Some day, it will come back to haunt them.
post link
author: RoohsMama
submitted: January 11, 2024 at 11:50AM via SaintMeghanMarkle on Reddit
120 notes
·
View notes