#micromessaging

[scopophilic1997]

scopOphilic_micromessaging_948 - scopOphilic1997 presents a new micro-messaging series: small, subtle, and often unintentional messages we send and receive verbally and non-verbally.

[themomentthat]

scopOphilic is proud to announce that we have an image in the TRASH group exhibition at Local Project Inc (11-27 44th Road Long Island City/Queens, NY.) The opening is November 5th 2022 from 6pm to 8pm. Please join us. @local_project The exhibit is up from November 5th to November 26th 2022. #scopOphilic1997 #scopophilic #brucemorrow #nft #nftart #digitalart #micromessaging #streetart #graffiti #localproject @local_project #nyc #trash #johnwaters @john_waters_divine_trash_page #queens #longislandcity @momaps1 (at Local Project Art Space) https://www.instagram.com/p/Ckg7AxJrda-/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=

[sleevebuscemii]

absolutely hate it when celebs will take an otherwise non-theme dress and be like ‘actually the beading represents this part of the theme and the thread has little micromessages with transcriptions of the themes history etc etc’ like MA’AM if i cannot see out front on my little mober phone screen that the dress is on theme it is not on theme i dont care about your technicalities

[treacl19]

(via branching out wider)

#SM #communications #micromessaging

[reseau-actu]

La SEC, le gendarme boursier américain, a accusé le PDG de Telsa d'avoir violé un accord où il s'était engagé à ne plus partager d'information sur Twitter pouvant influer sur le cours de l'action de son entreprise.

Qui empêchera Elon Musk de tweeter? C'est la question que se pose sans doute la SEC, le gendarme américain de la Bourse. Lundi, l'organisme fédéral a officiellement porté plainte contre le PDG de Tesla, accusé d'avoir enfreint un accord lui interdisant de partager sur Twitter des informations pouvant influer le cours de l'action de son entreprise. En cause, un tweet partagé par l'entrepreneur le 19 février. «Tesla ne produisait aucune voiture en 2011, mais en produira 500.000 en 2019», s'était vanté Elon Musk. Le message a été partagé plus de 10.000 fois et «liké» par près de 141.000 personnes.

Problème: Elon Musk n'avait a priori pas le droit de faire ce tweet. Le PDG de Twitter est un utilisateur avide du réseau social de micromessages. Il y partage les actualités de son entreprise, parfois des messages plus personnels, mais aussi de nombreuses plaisanteries, pour le meilleur et pour le pire.

«Elon Musk a violé notre accord»

En août 2018, le PDG a été jusqu'à déclarer sur Twitter qu'il envisageait de retirer Tesla de la cote, sans prévenir son conseil d'administration. Il y indiquait que son entreprise serait rachetée par divers fonds, à 420 dollars par action. Aux États-Unis, le chiffre 420 est utilisé pour faire référence à la consommation de cannabis.

Suite à ce tweet, le cours de l'action de Tesla avait d'abord bondi, avant de chuter de 20% en dix jours. L'affaire était suffisamment importante pour attirer l'attention de la SEC. En octobre, le gendarme boursier a forcé Elon Musk à abandonner la présidence du conseil d'administration de son entreprise, et à régler une amende de 20 millions de dollars. L'entrepreneur s'était enfin engagé à faire relire ses tweets par quelqu'un d'autre avant leur publication, et à ne plus partager d'informations pouvant potentiellement avoir un effet sur le cours de Bourse de Tesla.

Pour compliquer un peu plus les choses, le tweet publié le 19 février était faux. Elon Musk a d'ailleurs lui-même rectifié le tir, quelques heures plus tard. «Je voulais dire que le taux de production annualisé à la fin de 2019 serait probablement d'environ 500.000 unités, c'est-à-dire 10.000 voitures par semaine. Les livraisons pour cette année sont toujours attendues à environ 400.000 unités», a-t-il précisé, dans un autre message. Des précisions insuffisantes pour la SEC. «Elon Musk n'a ni cherché ni obtenu d'approbation pour la publication de ce tweet qui était inexact et a été diffusé auprès de plus de 24 millions de personnes», a déclaré l'organisme. «Par conséquent, Elon Musk a violé notre accord en faisant exactement ce qu'il n'avait pas le droit de faire.»

On ignore pour le moment les conséquences potentielles de la plainte de la SEC. Une chose est certaine: Elon Musk ne semble pas prêt à faire de compromis. Lundi soir, le PDG s'est défendu, à sa manière, c'est-à-dire en se moquant de la SEC dans un tweet. «Visiblement, la SEC n'a pas lu le compte rendu de la conférence avec les analystes suite à nos derniers résultats financiers, où il est bien écrit un chiffre entre 300.000 et 500.000», a insisté l'entrepreneur. «C'est embarrassant...»

[complexpapers]

Urban isolation and daytime neighborhood social composition from Twitter data

---

In a recent paper in PNAS, Wang et al. (1) investigate the key question of urban isolation in light of daily mobility. Urban isolation may actually be mitigated by individuals spending much of their everyday lives in neighborhoods where social composition and urban opportunities widely diverge from their home neighborhoods. From a large dataset composed of 128 million geotagged micromessages called tweets, sent by 392,000 Twitter users living in ...

https://www.pnas.org/content/115/51/E11886

[northxnisha-blog]

#ApacheESME moved into the Attic in July 2013. Apache ESME (Enterprise Social Messaging Environment) was a secure and highly scalable microsharing and micromessaging platform that allows people to discover and meet one another and get controlled access to other sources of information.For #pov & #techanalysis on these #techs, register to our daily publication calendar #northxviews - http://tech.rithanya.com/tech/publication-calendar

[thursdayfilebuzz]

Laugh and the World Laughs With You. Type ‘Ha,’ Not So Much. illustration by Elwood Smith by Jessica Bennett - July 08, 2017 - https://www.nytimes.com It was early in our courtship that I realized the guy I was dating, with whom I now cohabit, wasn’t laughing at my jokes. Well actually, he may have been laughing at my jokes, and in fact I thought he was laughing at my jokes, because he consistently responded with boisterous HAHAHAs to my humorous text messages. It was flattering. Except when I made a joke that clearly wasn’t that funny — perhaps only worthy of a single ha — and suddenly it dawned on me that his typical HAHAHA reply (that’s three HAs, no spaces, all caps) was formulaic. Which could mean only one thing: This was not indicative of an actual measurement of laughter, but merely of the autocorrect function on his phone that had memorized a HA sequence. I was the idiot thinking I was hilarious and he was just sooo into me. Textual representations of laughter go back at least to Chaucer, who fancied the onomatopoeic “haha” to convey merriment in his writing. (Shakespeare preferred a more staccato “ha, ha, he.”) But neither Chaucer nor Shakespeare could have predicted the universe of meaning that now exists in the subtle nuance between those two expressions. These days, a HAHAHA versus a ha in a text can indicate the difference between “I’m dying laughing” and “I literally never want to see you again.” In an era when “Moby Dick” can be rewritten in emoji, it makes sense that a few ha’s provoke such close scrutiny. Laughter, linguists will tell you, establishes closeness and conveys meaning. It sends micromessages to our conversation partner through length, tone, intonation and facial expressions. “It does the work of establishing cohesion,” said Michelle McSweeney, a research scholar at Columbia University who studies digital communication. “To say, ‘I feel comfortable enough around you to laugh.’” Another variation on haha includes “haha?” It is intended for that friend who texts you the inappropriate joke, when you’re not sure if you’re supposed to laugh or perhaps when the inappropriate joke was yours. There’s ha ha ha (note the spaces) as a way to indicate what my 13-year-old self might have referred to as “hardy har har” — or, very funny — NOT. And the more mischievous mwahahaha or bahahaha. And of course there is an emoji ha — which is crying tears of laughter and should not be confused with the crying tears of sadness that is apparently the most commonly used emoji on Instagram. “I have one friend I was convinced was autocorrecting hahaha to Bahahaha, but really it was purposeful, just a little micronuance to her digital laugh,” said Ilana Webber, a 31-year-old musician in New York. “I like it because it’s a serious laugh. Like, I’m not screwing around with that laugh, I’m laughing.” “It’s for more deserving instances, I think,” Ms. Webber added. “Or potentially if I want to make the other person feel good even if it’s not that worthy.” Like any dialect, electronic laughter has evolved. The first usage of LOL appeared in a Canadian chat room 27 years ago, coined by a man who described it as a response to a joke by a friend named Sprout. It was “so funny,” the man explained in a blog post, “that I found myself truly laughing out loud, echoing off the walls of my kitchen.” ROFL (rolling on the floor laughing) and ROFLOL (rolling on the floor laughing out loud) followed LOL some time in the early 1990s. By 2015, when Facebook conducted a study of e-laughter on its platform, haha and hehe, followed by the laughing emoji, were among the most common types of laughs. One of my friends, noting that the internet “is so weird,” said that one time she and a friend of hers made up “IATFLI” and tried to popularize it. That is: I’m about to lose it, along with a word we cannot print. But they couldn’t make IATFLI happen. It’s striking how little of this online “laughter” has to do with humor. These days, linguists might say online laughter has more of a “discourse function,” said Ms. McSweeney, who analyzed 45,000 text messages from bilingual young adults, noting that 14 percent of all the messages had LOL in them. As far back as 2008, a study of online language among teenagers published in the journal American Speech found that LOL had come to be used “as a signal of interlocutor involvement, just as one might say ‘mm-hm’ in the course of a conversation.” Ms. McSweeney’s research, recently presented at the annual conference of the Linguistic Society of America, found that digital laughter can be used for among other activities flirtation, with a haha or an LOL acting as a kind of casual wink. (Him: “What are you doing?” Her: “Talking ... lol.” The subtext: “maybe about you!”) There’s the laughter that hedges or softens what you might be saying. There’s laughter as turn-taking, the text equivalent of a pause to say, “Now you speak.” There’s also laughter as a way of showing empathy, the subject of a popular Ted talk by the linguist John McWhorter. Imagine: Colleague: Ugh, that meeting sucked. You: lol I know. Interestingly, Ms. McSweeney said, people don’t pick up each other’s digital laughter in quite the same way they do in real life; it is called “behavioral mimicry.” “When it comes to texts, a ha-space-ha-er does not become a haha-er. An LMAO-er does not become a LOLer,” she said. “So online laughter is very much like a fingerprint, which is actually very much like real life. You recognize people’s laughs.” Unless, of course, they’re being autocorrected by a robot. ------------------------------ Steven H MacDowall Why not take a moment and sign up to the Thursday File, my blog www.thursdayfile.com

[kissmekimsuru]

3. 초이스시스템

초이스 선택하기풀싸롱 초이스는 매직미러초이스로 진행을 하고 있습니다. 룸에 계신 손님은 아가씨들을 볼 수 있으나,

아가씨들은 거울로 보이기 때문에 부담없이 편안하게 담당 실무자에게 원숭이방향제

의견을 얻어가며 초이스를 할 수 있는 장점이 있습니다.

● 담당 실무자와 의사소통초이스를 할 때에 담당 실무자와 손님들만이 룸에 계신 상태로 아가씨들을 보실 겁니다.

이때, 아가씨들에 대한 정보는 단골이 아니시라면 모를 수 밖에 없는

상황으로써 담당실무자에게 아가씨들의 성향을 물어보시면서 초이스를 함에 있어 도움을 받으시는 것을 권장드립니다.

● 외모보다는 성향으로! 강남풀싸롱을 대화만 하러 오신 손님이 아니시라면 제대로 즐기기 위해서는 잘 노는 성향의

아가씨들을 초이스 하시는 것을 추천드립니다. 풀싸롱에서는 원숭이방향제

아가씨들의 외모나 몸매가 많이 차이나지 않으며, 개인적인 취향에 의존하여 초이스를 하게 되는데 많은 아가씨들이

있으며, 외적인 부분에서는 비슷하다�� 보기 때문에 노는 성향에 따라초이스 하는 것을 권장드립니다

[scopophilic1997]

scopOphilic_micromessaging_946 - scopOphilic1997 presents a new micro-messaging series: small, subtle, and often unintentional messages we send and receive verbally and non-verbally.

[scopophilic1997]

scopOphilic_micromessaging_903 - scopOphilic1997 presents a new micro-messaging series: small, subtle, and often unintentional messages we send and receive verbally and non-verbally.

[scopophilic1997]

scopOphilic_micromessaging_945 - scopOphilic1997 presents a new micro-messaging series: small, subtle, and often unintentional messages we send and receive verbally and non-verbally.

[scopophilic1997]

scopOphilic_micromessaging_942 - scopOphilic1997 presents a new micro-messaging series: small, subtle, and often unintentional messages we send and receive verbally and non-verbally.

And now for something completely different to launch into April.

[scopophilic1997]

scopOphilic_micromessaging_904 - scopOphilic1997 presents a new micro-messaging series: small, subtle, and often unintentional messages we send and receive verbally and non-verbally.