#ultimatebottom69

[cinderspots]

Hey. I finally downloaded your game. And may i say the first two images are maming me laugh so bad.

"Ah yes. Family wholesome to play in them chruches yes."

"What. Consequences ? To my actions ? Unbelievable ma'am."

Obviously intended for churches, yes. 100% recommend that course of action 👍

[ultimatebottom69]

i hope the people you follow regularly make use of the "i'm sorry my follower said that" cake

We don't have cakes with my mutuals anon mate. Best we do is say "They were correct but said it in the worst way possible" also you ain't slick my last post are about how Harry Potter serie is fucked no matter what they pull out.

Like this is legit the only post that I know of who could elicit an anon "hate" , like you mad because I am queer, fag and proud (which if you look at my username you would have guessed) or because I was always right about not really liking Harry Potter (Except for Hermione Granger and Luna in the Books.)

Listen if you like a book serie who's whole system is worse then capitalism itself as it relies on constant rascism, xenophobia, antisemitism oh yeah fucking British people leading the world (I am sure nothing bad will happen) and many stupid stereotypes that only 12 year old will like...

Just go watch South Park. At least it's offensive to everybody without a fault. And it's not British. Oh and it has a solid story telling and assume when it fucked up.

[trees-to-meet-you]

Hello it was just to reassure you about Pikachu man. I will keep rebloging him as it is a fine gentleman. I mean he has glasses iateas of eyes.

:)

[disordersgirl]

im so obsessed with this i forget where i found it but like. the five million checkmarks the six fan the ultimatebottom69 literally where am i

[theauthor2103]

They hug

@ashyngs @adryanscott @milkiedimitrescu @dino-king-rex @ghost-n-butteredtoast @dani-dimitrescu @ultimatebottom69

[doberbutts]

@ultimatebottom69

I'm going to imagine myself kissing characters that suck ass even harder now actually. Missed the point but that's okay I can still love my problematic faves.

[blue-sky-singer]

@ultimatebottom69

Hello? Have… have you seen my mother or father..?

[cruncherzz]

you ever just join an re8 discord server and troll just to leave before anyone notices you're there?

also i saw @ultimatebottom69 was there so hiya!

and also bye W H EE. Z E E E

[freyanistics]

Okay I have no way to prove this but I’m almost 100% positive ultimatebottom69 is also a minor. Why else would someone not have a problem with a minor interacting with adults and posting NSFW? Another minor in the servers I guarantee you.

That could be very plausible. They claim they were adult in dms and have actively engaged in my nsfw posts on here as well as my mutuals. They could also be lying about their age or is just a dumbass adult who probably is doing some sus shit imo. No sensible adult would be okay with minors in nsfw spaces and talking sexual with adults, even if it’s about fictional characters. Unless they’re a predator 💁🏾‍♀️

[cinderspots]

I didn't know bela's route had a bad ending. Made me laugh. Miranda really is that bitch. Love her.

They all have bad endings, 3 in total. Romantic, Neutral, and Cult

[ultimatebottom69]

Even pretending women who find men to be more of a "vague concept than humans with rights" existed, that's nowhere on par with how men treat and have treated women through history as property or less and abused or murdered us for asking for better. Misandry annoys; it doesn't harm like misogyny.

This is also a super weird take as the only women who dislike the movie don't hate it because they hate men (???), they hate it because they see it as bimbo feminism that hurts women.

So you admit you hate the way woman are respresent3d by a doll who has set too high standards for beauty amongst woman AND that in the same breath you sincerely thinks that misandry isn' that big of a deal compared to misoginy, implying that men have it easier then women when the movie is about how men are also victim of the system.

Also every single conservative woman, said some shit like "It's anti-men" which explains clearly that their idea of a man is clearly this broad-shouldered cold guy who hates women and should breed until he dies and never show any emotion except constrained joy and pure seething rage.

In my book that's hating men.

Women and men are both humans not two different species that just had to cohabit for the sake of the other. We ain't roomates or some bullshit, we're litterally the same, the system has rotten you so bad that when you read a queer person named "Ultimatebottom69" on Tumblr aka Dying site dot com, say "Hey women who hated this movie clearly hates men" and decided to come in like a little coward under the guise of anymous mask to explain to me that clearly misandry isn' that big of deal.

How the fuck do you even dare come into my ask box you barely disguised TERF gal ? Like at least pretend you give a damn about feminism which this movie was clearly about but oh yeah it wasn't your lovely "Women are oppressed by men but given power they would definitely be superior" type of feminsim it was "Well we are both humans and we were dicks to each others in different ways who could have been sold if we jist talked about it but neither of us was really ready to do that so we hurt each others and I am sorry" feminism.

You know actual true feminism not your "not like other girls" bs. Real feminsim strives for the end of patriachy AND matriarchy. Feminism strives for equity in all aspects no matter your gender.

The Barbie Movie was excellent and I will not tolerate your bs in my askbox. Either you get ok with me saying Misandry is shit and harms women too or you go back to definitely-not-white-supremacist-nazi land

I excuse myself if you were someone who was sincerely not reading well my post and needed some highlights on it. But I cannot see what type of blog you are so I will by default assume you are 5 times worse then I think.

Have a nice day and equity or die.

[dragon-arnault]

@ultimatebottom69

@dimitrescutie

(After days of procrastination…)

Info Dump time!

I was asked by my younger sister a question;

“Say every single one of my living OCs in RE gets into a battle Royal fight to the death-no weapons, no armor, no magic, just fighting with their own bodies, who’s the last one standing?”

Well, before I answer that question-i told her, Im going to show you something-don’t worry, it won’t take long.

(Credit goes to the official artwork)

Yeah, it comes as no surprise to those who know.

Dorothea in her human form is around 220 pounds and is tall enough to look a lot of tall people in the eye.

While dragons preferred their menacing reptilian form to strike fear into the hearts of many…. Dorothea is a little different, she prefers to kill with her human form-especially during her days as an assassin.

The average human has over 600 muscles in their body.

Dorothea has 40,000 muscles-in her hand. Which is why a motivated dragon like her can lift large airlines with one hand and shatter concrete pillars by just backhanding it-you know, the things that are meant to hold up buildings.

Dorothea is physically the strongest of my living OCs-even powerful and durable tanks like Mary are overwhelmed and overpowered by her.

Dorothea’s scales and skin, even in human form, are pretty much indestructible-with very few weapons and/or beings capable of piercing her skin, her flesh is even harder to penetrate.

@martadimitrescu Oc-named Marta Dimitrescu is an absolute force to be reckon with and is the biological eldest daughter of Alcina Dimitrescu. She is immensely strong and is blade and bullet proof. Who can make Albert Whesker her bitch, Practice Origami on Nemesis and Nae Nae on Mr.X’s Grave.

And one of the few beings that can actually damage Dorothea without any of the required weapons to bypass her scales and flesh, granted it may take a while.

Credit where it’s due I’m not gonna pretend like Marta is gonna go out like that-Dorothea fighting Marta is like bending a thumb tack-even if you succeed it’ll cost you a finger or two. Literally.

While it’s true Dorothea has been know to overpower Marta and defeat her-you can guarantee that Marta did NOT go quietly and definitely took a chunk of flesh with her

Regardless, A Dragon when it’s instincts take over is one of the most violent things on four legs because it’s literally on sight with anything that isn’t their mate or friends. And Dorothea wasn’t any different back then. And while she’s more in control now to say that she’s in complete control is a lie.

You know something really messed up?

Rexy’s second form-called the Mortem Rex, literally means ‘Death King’ but it’s never actually killed anyone.

Dorothea however has made the census 5,000 names lighter each year back in her assassination days.

All that I didn’t even touch on her true form-her dragon form-which is much stronger.

With claws that can grow to six feet long by the way. And for reference-I’m a grown man, (22) and I’m only six feet when I’m lying or on Instagram.

So, in short-in a battle Royal with every one of my Living RE OCs?

Respectfully Dorothea is basically an incel.

Nobody is fucking with her.

[bisexualstegosaurus]

@ultimatebottom69 pspsps cottage core or academia vibes?

[estrogen-eater]

Hello handsome weirdo, I love your username. Have a nice day my liege.

thank you tumblr user ultimatebottom69

[amogus-sex69]

Hehe 69.

Ayyy 69

[lovelylittlewordsmith]

@ultimatebottom69

Hi!  No need to be sorry for asking a question—I’m more than happy to answer! 😊  Unfortunately, I am unable to respond directly to my original post.  Tumblr will not allow me to reblog, so I suspect that OP blocked me.

In regards to your question, it appears that you may have misunderstood my statement.  I actually agree with you that the movie was very easy to follow.  After all, it’s heavily inspired by W. W. Jacob’s The Monkey’s Paw, which many viewers are already familiar with.  The movie told a story, but I do believe the end product could have been more polished.

In regards to the plot being messy, three things jump out to me:

Pacing

Characterization

Plot Holes/Inconsistencies/Suspension of Disbelief

Starting with pacing, it took us nearly 50 minutes to get to the actual plot.  While the opening scene in Themyscira and the mall fight scene were enjoyable, it left the remainder of the film in an uncomfortable tug-of-war between a sense of urgency and indifference to learning about the Dreamstone.  By the time we reached the climax, the ending felt rushed and Cheetah’s appearance left the impression of being shoehorned in rather than being the long-awaited outcome of Barbara’s actions.

Diana’s characterization is this film was perhaps one of the biggest aspects that disappointed me.  I doubt it was intentional, but this movie really centered her personality around her love of Steve Trevor.  It’s understandable that she misses him, but it’s been nearly 70 years since his death.  After all, we never see her mourning the loss of her sisters on Themyscira whom she can never see again.  It just doesn’t make sense to me that Diana’s life and happiness must be tied to a man.  By nature, she is loving and sociable, and she finds joy in human life.  I really do think that within those 70 years she should have made more friends long before Barbara enters the picture.   It might have been better for the movie if it took place in an earlier time while her feelings are still fresh and she is still adapting to the world of man, but then producers wouldn’t be able to milk that good ol�� 80’s nostalgia.

Onto the third point, many beloved movies and books require suspension of disbelief to be enjoyed properly; however, there must be a limit.  I felt that WW84 pushed that limit too far.  Without going into excessive details (as this post is probably getting long enough), we have:

Steve occupying the body of an innocent.  Neither he nor Diana appear to give this more than a second thought.

Steve’s body switching also breaks the rules of the Dreamstone.  We see everyone’s wishes appear in the most literal sense no matter how ridiculous they are.  If the stone can make walls, live animals, and money appear from nothing, surely it can make a human appear as well.  It should be able to overcome death otherwise not every wish could be undone by the end (as we were shown a woman wishing for a man to “drop dead.”)

Diana stated that many great civilizations disappeared overnight, when we know for a fact that most of the ones listed didn’t (Rome probably being the one most viewers are knowledge of).

Asteria’s golden armor was supposedly strong enough to let her fight off hoards of men, but is easily destroyed by Cheetah.

The somehow fueled and perfectly operational museum jet was  able to be flown by a WWI pilot who had no experience with that technology.

Cheetah is willing to die rather than give up her wish, but in the end she simply does so because Diana asks everyone to do so.  It’s a sudden and quite jarring change in her character.

So in answer to your question, these are the main points that come to my mind.  As for the tone, I think we are in agreement that it was clear.  It differed greatly from that of the first movie, but a tone was present.  All in all, there’s going to be differences of opinion for WW84 just like there are for any movie.  As I said in my original post to OP, WW84 is strong enough to stand on its own.  It doesn’t need to be protected from criticisms whether they come from “straight men” or anyone else for that matter.

While I am personally disappointed with the end result, I am glad that you and many others enjoyed it.  It’s these differing opinions that allow us to have discussions about movies and share our own perspectives.  I hope that I was able to throughly answer your question! 😄