Tumgik
#web hosting presidential election
moyalucom · 2 years
Text
HostGator - Easy, Affordable and Unlimited Web Hosting
HostGator – Easy, Affordable and Unlimited Web Hosting
Ever since its conception nine years earlier, HostGator has provided web hosting sets to thousands of satisfied clients all across the globe. The biggest success of this web hosting company has been the fact that they have an ideal package for just about anybody, from a beginning to a top notch specialized. If you read a HostGator review, you will get to know the range of sets offered by this…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
oussnet · 2 years
Text
0 notes
mariacallous · 2 years
Text
There was a ripple of laughter in the US Supreme Court on February 21 when Justice Elena Kagan said: “We are a court—we really don’t know about these things. We are not, like, the nine greatest experts on the internet."
On February 21, the nine justices heard oral arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. Google, a case brought by Reynaldo Gonzalez, whose daughter was killed in a 2015 ISIS terror attack in Paris and who alleges that YouTube’s algorithm aided in the attack by recommending the group’s recruitment videos to people who would be most susceptible to their message. The outcome of the case could decide the future of social media platforms worldwide. 
At the heart of the case is the question of whether tech companies should be held liable for harmful content posted on their platforms by their users—something for which they are currently protected under Section 230 of the Telecommunications Act, a 1996 piece of legislation whose primary purpose was to increase competition in broadcasting and telecoms markets. It is a protection that has shielded companies whose platforms have enormous reach and influence from being held responsible for harms caused by extremist content and disinformation. But it is also a fundamental underpinning of free speech online. 
“The purpose of Section 230 was to try to prevent platforms from becoming the soccer ball that gets kicked around whenever people disagree about what appropriate free expression on the internet is,” says Andrew Sullivan, president and CEO of the Internet Society, which filed an amicus brief in support of Section 230. “If you start to mess with this, you’re fundamentally messing with the design of the internet. And that is going to lead to a splintering of the network.”
Debates over Section 230 have largely been confined to the circuit courts—lower levels of the US federal court system—for nearly two decades. That changed after the 2016 presidential election, when Republican lawmakers began to seize on and amplify often spurious claims that platforms were censoring conservative users. That message proved effective in galvanizing elements of their base, and Republican figures have continued to accuse major tech firms, such as Meta and Twitter, of bias. 
One prominent example of this supposedly “biased” enforcement is Facebook’s 2018 decision to ban Alex Jones, host of the right-wing Infowars website who later was slapped with $1.5 billion in damages after harassing the families of the victims of a mass shooting.
Many of the actions that infuriated Republicans were those shielded by the First Amendment to the US constitution, which guarantees free speech. Those protections are essentially unassailable legislatively, so lawmakers targeted Section 230 instead. 
Starting in 2018, prominent conservatives began demanding changes to the law that would expressly hinge Section 230’s liability protections on how companies treat political speech. High-profile Republicans, including Missouri senator Josh Hawley and Texas senator Ted Cruz, frequently misconstrued the section’s language. “The predicate for Section 230 immunity … is that you’re a neutral public forum,” Cruz said in 2018, interpreting the law as shielding only websites that treat left- and right-wing political views equally. 
Recent laws in both Texas and Florida have sought to impose greater restrictions on the way platforms can and cannot police content.
Gonzalez v. Google takes a different track, focusing on platforms’ failure to deal with extremist content. Social media platforms have been accused of facilitating hate speech and calls to violence that have resulted in real-world harm, from a genocide in Myanmar to killings in Ethiopia and a coup attempt in Brazil.
“The content at issue is obviously horrible and objectionable,” says G. S. Hans, an associate law professor at Cornell University in New York. “But that’s part of what online speech is. And I fear that the sort of extremity of the content will lead to some conclusions or religious implications that I don’t think are really reflective of the larger dynamic of the internet.”
The Internet Society’s Sullivan says that the arguments around Section 230 conflate Big Tech companies—which, as private companies, can decide what content is allowed on their platforms—with the internet as a whole. 
“People have forgotten the way the internet works,” says Sullivan. “Because we’ve had an economic reality that has meant that certain platforms have become overwhelming successes, we have started to confuse social issues that have to do with the overwhelming dominance by an individual player or a small handful of players with problems to do with the internet.” 
Sullivan worries that the only companies able to survive such regulations would be larger platforms, further calcifying the hold that Big Tech platforms already have.
Decisions made in the US on internet regulation are also likely to reverberate around the world. Prateek Waghre, policy director at the Internet Freedom Foundation in India, says a ruling on Section 230 could set a precedent for other countries.
“It’s less about the specifics of the case,” says Waghre. “It’s more about [how] once you have a prescriptive regulation or precedent coming out of the United States, that is when other countries, especially those that are authoritarian-leaning, are going to use it to justify their own interventions.”
India’s government is already making moves to take more control over content within the country, including establishing a government-appointed committee on content moderation and greater enforcement of the country’s IT rules.
Waghre suspects that if platforms have to implement policies and tools to comply with an amended, or entirely obliterated, Section 230, then they will likely apply those same methods and standards to other markets as well. In many countries around the world, big platforms, particularly Facebook, are so ubiquitous as to essentially function as the internet for millions of people.
“Once you start doing something in one country, then that’s used as precedent or reasoning to do the same thing in another country,” he says.
12 notes · View notes
Text
A right-wing talk show host running in a high-profile special election in Georgia allegedly voted illegally nine times while serving probation for felony convictions, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported Monday.
The candidate, Brian K. Pritchard, is running in a Jan. 3 special election to replace former Georgia Speaker of the House David Ralston, who died last month shortly after winning re-election. Pritchard is running against Sheree Ralston, the late legislator’s widow, in a safe Republican seat that David Ralston won uncontested last month.
Pritchard, who is now accused of voting illegally, has also falsely claimed the 2020 presidential election was “stolen” from former President Donald Trump, and accused Republican state officials of being “complicit,” according to the Journal-Constitution.
When Pritchard first registered to vote in Georgia in January 2008, he was still on probation after he pleaded guilty in 1996 to felony forgery and theft charges in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. In Georgia, former felons aren’t allowed to vote until they’ve completed their sentence, which includes probation.
In February 2021, Georgia’s State Election Board accused Pritchard of voting while serving a felony sentence, one of dozens of voter fraud cases referred to prosecutors at the time, according to the Clay County Progress. At the time, Pritchard’s attorney said Pritchard was not aware he was considered a felon when he cast his ballots, according to the Journal-Constitution.
And last week, the office of Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr—one of those officials Pritchard accused of being “complicit” in the “stolen” election, according to the Journal-Constitution—said in a filing that Pritchard had broken the law each time he voted, the Journal-Constitution reported.
Carr’s office said Pritchard voted five times in 2008 and four times in 2010, according to August-based TV station WDRW. Carr’s office has requested a hearing in Fannin County, where Pritchard lives, for the week of Jan. 9, after the special election.
Pritchard could face up to $45,000 in fines, but he hasn’t been criminally charged and he wouldn’t be disqualified from serving in the legislature if he wins the election, according to the Journal-Constitution.
Pritchard has vehemently denied the accusation and appeared to imply he was targeted due to his candidacy. “I’ve not done anything wrong here,” Pritchard, who also owns a media company called FetchYourNews, told the Journal-Constitution Monday. “I guess if you’re apprehending public enemy No. 1, here I am.”
“I will not be intimidated,” Pritchard told the Dawson County News last week. “I will not be bullied.”
Pritchard said in a press release when he announced his run last week that he “will always support our law enforcement.”
“The safety and well-being of our citizens will alway be a top priority of mine,” Pritchard said in the release. “Keep Atlanta crime out of our mountains!”
These accusations haven’t stopped Pritchard from spreading lies about the 2020 election. Pritchard accused Carr and Gov. Brian Kemp of being “complicit” in a stolen election during an April episode of his web show.
“I don't believe 81 million people voted for [Joe Biden],” Pritchard said at the time. “When they stole an election, and Brian Kemp was complicit, the Governor of Georgia, and Chris Carr the Attorney General was complicit in Georgia, and you see Joe Biden…this is what they did to us.”
During the same episode, Pritchard said that Biden has dementia and called Georgia Sen. Raphael Warnock a “false prophet.”
15 notes · View notes
9/25/2024
We're Baaaaaack! A Urumalli, U Macinasar, G Entum - Unique Destinations Enterprise and UniqueDestinations.org are now - back online - with words for ALL the planet to hear, posted in the latest message on the Director's Den page - (which is located in a button press off the About Us page.) (These words were mostly composed before Joe Biden stepped aside, from U.S. Presidential election consideration this November, and Kamala Harris stepped forward, and now the United Nations holds its General Assembly - and the UNGA - conversing on the topics of: Unity; Diversity; and Peace.) To Us working here, - moving 'forward' - is the ONLY logical path - into the Future. (and revisiting past assumptions - to correct - any basic comprehension misapprehensions.) We are about - expanding human horizons - and human opportunities, and for over five years - We have taken pains to broadcast Our information to as many people as We could manage - in '104 languages + spoken English voice'. at NO cost to the world -wide-web wanders, (We also encourage the readers, to share Our words with their vision impaired friends, by reading Our words, to them.) We are not fond of 'conspiracy talk' (although, to Us, there has seemed some very curious consequences, that has held Us back and offline until this day.) We are about SHARING information - which if proven out - is information that will be ADDITIVE to the body of human understanding. We also have something else to wrap your mind and hands around,... We have amazing coffee mugs to offer the public, that can put this heated enigma on your kitchen table or office desk! (Watch the eyes widen in the break room! It can be quite the conversation piece!) It has been 236 days since We took Ourselves offline, on Groundhog Day, for webpage component conflicts. We ARE baaack! P.S. The Website counters now will correctly tally novel, unique, global wanderers as they encounter Our Home page as well as the different wanderers who visit in the days' time. We would like to thank the folk at 'Bluehost' for hosting and keeping Us secure; and 'Blue Sky' and 'ProDesignLIVE' - Our Word Press phone support helpers - who have served as Our extended office assistants, Please - if you see any of those fine folk - out and about - if you meet any of these fine people,... if you were to maybe,... buy them a drink, or appetizer to munch, in the cool shade,... they could maybe be persuaded to tell to you some tales,... - (ALL of the Word Press folk who have helped Us have been given the mandatory background 'tours' and know Our intentions better than anyone else. For some reason Google is having trouble showing the website, (maybe because it has been down so long?) however DuckDuckGo does take the viewer to the Home page. @arimelber and @neildegrassetysonofficial We have included your names for continuity and your possible interest. @nasa We include you out of Our deep respect.
0 notes
xnewsinfo · 7 days
Link
US Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris will be part of billionaire Oprah Winfrey for a web-based occasion with grassroots teams on Thursday to rally help in battleground states.The "Unite for America" ​​occasion, co-hosted by Winfrey and the activist group Win with Black Girls, goals to register folks to vote and bolster Harris in states like Pennsylvania, Georgia and Michigan which might be poised to resolve. The elections of November fifth.Harris and Winfrey will livestream the occasion at 8 p.m. EDT (0000 GMT) on social media, together with Instagram and TikTok, from Michigan, the place Harris has been campaigning within the Detroit space, native media reported.Dozens of grassroots teams are taking part, together with Latinas for Harris, Win With Black Males and Republicans for Harris. Win with Black Girls campaigns for Black ladies to win elected workplace. Harris is Black and of South Asian descent.The teams, which have rallied round Harris since she entered the race in July, have helped elevate greater than $20 million for her marketing campaign, in line with a Unite for America information launch."What's most essential to me is getting folks to vote and ensuring that everybody makes a plan not only for themselves, however for his or her households and associates," Winfrey, a businesswoman, philanthropist and former tv host, mentioned in a press release.In a current Reuters ballot, Harris led her Republican opponent Donald Trump by 47% to 42%.Harris was forward within the battleground states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Nevada and North Carolina, whereas Trump had larger help in Georgia, in line with polling aggregator FiveThirtyEight's averages. They're tied in Arizona.Trump will take part in an occasion in Washington on Thursday on combating anti-Semitism and deal with the Israeli-American Council Summit.Hours after President Joe Biden dropped out and endorsed Harris because the Democratic nominee, 90,000 Black ladies joined a rally held by Win with Black Girls that raised $1.5 million in three hours, in line with the press launch.In August, Winfrey spoke on the Democratic Nationwide Conference in Chicago to foyer for Harris."I enchantment to all independents and all undecided voters," Winfrey mentioned, describing herself as an unbiased voter. "Decency and respect are on the poll in 2024."Posted by: Girish Kumar AnshulPosted on: September 19, 2024
0 notes
mediamonarchy · 2 months
Text
https://mediamonarchy.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/20240726_MorningMonarchy.mp3 Download MP3 Political actors, how music got free and trainwreck concerts + this day in history w/KickAssTorrents owner arrested and our song of the day by Remy on your #MorningMonarchy for July 26, 2024. Notes/Links: All the Musicians Supporting Kamala Harris in the 2024 Presidential Election; Ariana Grande, Cardi B, John Legend and more have all spoken in favor of the VP’s bid. https://www.billboard.com/lists/musicians-endorsing-kamala-harris-president-2024/ Vice President Kamala Harris Showed Off Her New Vinyl Records & They’re All Classics (May 9, 2023) https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/vice-president-kamala-harris-showed-233527981.html The Kamala Bump: Presidential Candidate Spurs Gains for Beyoncé, Charli XCX & Chappell Roan; This week’s Trending Up looks at the pop impact of Kamala Harris’ assumed presidential nomination, as well as the controversy over Kyle Gass of Tenacious D’s inflammatory Trump comments. https://www.billboard.com/music/chart-beat/kamala-harris-charli-xcx-chappell-roan-beyonce-streaming-trending-up-1235740053/ Universal Music Group Revenue Up Nearly 9% on Taylor Swift Sales, Publishing and Merchandise Gains; Subscription revenue continued to grow, but other streaming revenue — including ad-supported streaming — declined in the quarter. https://www.billboard.com/pro/universal-music-earnings-q2-2024-revenue-up-taylor-swift-merch Kamala Harris’ media strategy right out the gate is young, fun, and unburdened by what has been https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/kamala-harris-media-strategy-right-out-the-gate-is-young-fun-and-unburdened-by-what-has-been/ar-BB1qqlgM Video: Top Ten Reasons Joe Biden Dropped Out Of The Race | Letterman (Audio) https://youtu.be/DeT3KpN2Ol0 Franz Ferdinand – “Fresh Strawberries” (Vinyl // Audio) https://www.discogs.com/release/4849298-Franz-Ferdinand-Right-Thoughts-Right-Words-Right-Action // https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fresh_Strawberries // https://search.brave.com/search?q=Right+Thoughts%2C+Right+Words%2C+Right+Action+occult&source=web&summary=1&summary_og=59af4961ace562e80bcebf // https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAbPx_-IJBI Aging sports voices, 80 and above, deserve more attention and should retain more consideration https://www.sportsbroadcastjournal.com/aging-sports-voices-80-and-above-deserve-more-attention-and-should-retain-more-consideration/ As Broadcast Radio Struggles to Compete, Morning Show Hosts Are Losing Their Jobs; Amid heavy debt loads, advertising declines and competition from streaming, stations are eliminating often highly paid a.m.-drive talent. https://archive.is/uiYse SAG-AFTRA is going on strike against the video game industry. https://x.com/DiscussingFilm/status/1816558665991688553 Fired ‘Mandalorian’ actor Gina Carano ‘moved to tears’ after victory against Disney in her Elon Musk-funded lawsuit https://nypost.com/2024/07/25/business/gina-carano-scores-victory-against-disney-after-mandalorian-firing/ CBS’ Bob Newhart Tribute Special Hits 4.1 Million Viewers on CBS https://variety.com/2024/tv/news/bob-newhart-tribute-special-ratings-viewers-cbs-1236082340/ How music lost its value https://archive.is/QfD3D Video: How Music Got Free | Official Trailer | Paramount+ (Audio) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYUKEiLGHpQ #KINKmornings: Stephen Witt on ‘How Music Got Free’ – June 23, 2015 (Audio) https://soundcloud.com/kinkfm/kink-mornings-stephen-witt INXS – “Old World New World” (Vinyl // Audio) https://www.discogs.com/release/395063-INXS-Shabooh-Shoobah // https://genius.com/Inxs-old-world-new-world-lyrics // https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdSuHxYGKX8 #AlbumAnalysis: Ticketmaster warns customers to take action after hack https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/ticketmaster-warns-customers-to-take-action-after-hack/ar-BB1pF9Qh #AlbumAnalysis: Creed’s Reunion Tour Return: Inside Their Mega-Selling Comeback; Ticket demand for the band’s just-launched reunion tour makes frontman Scott Stapp emotional...
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
mfb1949 · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
Many have speculated that Trump’s 2016 election success and his life in general is only understandable if we assume he’s an undocumented space alien. Way back in 2017, Huffington Post ran a story by Alan Singer, “Twitter Is Buzzing With Donald Trump ‘Space Alien’ Rumors,” and he may be right. Perhaps, Trump is merely the host organism for an obscene extraterrestrial being.
Putting this theory to the test, our They Will Say ANYTHING! Biological Astrophysics specialists joined our High School Graphics Interns to produce the image below by combining the starscape as it existed on Trump’s birthday, June 14, 1946, supplemented by our interns’ conception of the Trumpian embryo entering earth orbit on that day.
Also, that year, The Nevada County Scooper opined, “Trump’s mystery hairdo is not a badly constructed wig nor is it a desperately coiffed comb over. It’s an alien spider that has woven a dense, messy web as camouflage as it sucks intelligence out of The Donald’s brain.” Yet, what intelligence might be gleaned from that particular brain? The question of Trump’s origins bedevils most Americans. His antics are not just “un-presidential,” they’re “”reverse-presidential.” How did the Twilight Zone miss that prediction?
0 notes
mightyflamethrower · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
The more candidate Trump in 2016 trolled the Clinton campaign (e.g., “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing, I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press”), the more the irate left bought into hysterical conspiracy theories.
Finally, the left became completely unhinged after the 2016 victory. An Obama-era Pentagon lawyer published an essay exploring the chance for a military coup. Retired lieutenant colonels called for a Pentagon intervention. Retired four-stars could not decide whether he was Hitler-like, Mussolini, or the architect of Auschwitz. Celebrities competed to find the most savage image of eliminating Trump—whether by combustion, incineration, decapitation, lethal shooting, or stabbing.
Since then, the press has run with lurid stories about Trump, from having syphilis sores on his hands to “proof” of him beating up Melania. But amid the unhinged hatred, nothing has quite reached the absurdity of the Russia! Russia! obsessions.
In 2016, the country went through crackpot leftist charges of Russian collusion that helped to destroy the lives of innocents like Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn, Carter Page, and George Papadopoulos. Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s lawyers (gushed over by pundits as the “dream team/all-stars/hunter-killer team”), despite all the pre-investigational hype and hagiography, spent 22 months and $40 million to find no evidence that the Russians swung the election to Trump.
But in that sordid process, we learned the following: that a felonious FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith was convicted of doctoring a court document to mislead a FISA court in efforts to surveille an innocent man; that the FBI director James Comey recorded and leaked via a third party to the New York Times a private, confidential, and likely classified conversation with the President and lied to the president that he was not the subject of a federal investigation; and that he preposterously claimed amnesia or ignorance on 245 occasions under oath to a congressional committee about the various skullduggery of the FBI under his watch.
Comey was outdone by special counsel Robert Mueller. He claimed under oath that he knew almost nothing about Fusion GPS or the Steele dossier, the twin catalysts that had led to his very appointment.
We learned in addition that Christopher Steele was hired by Hillary Clinton (whose campaign was fined $113,000 for federal campaign finance violations), albeit behind three stealthy paywalls (the DNC, Perkins Coie law firm, and Fusion GPS) to disguise her role.
The British ex-spy Steele’s mission was to find dirt on her presidential opponent, Trump. He did so by compiling a “dossier” of fakery and smears. Ironically, many of the most scurrilous charges might have reached Steele through Russian sources.
Yet the left and cable anchors cited as gospel the dossier chapter and verse—until they didn’t, once the weight of its ridiculousness finally crushed their assertions. Steele, remember, was at one time a paid FBI informant, and as a foreign national, was supposed to be barred by statute from being hired by a presidential campaign.
In one of the notable political scandals in recent history, the present National Security Advisor and former Clintonite campaign operative, Jake Sullivan, used various surrogates to promote the lie that there was some sort of secret “backchannel” electronic “ping” communications between the Russian Alfa Bank and the Trump campaign and Trump Organization. The concocted myth was considered useful in advancing the “collusion” lie throughout the media, until even MSNBC and CNN quietly dropped the accusation.
Note “Russian collusion” destroyed the careers of three former FBI chiefs and a host of others. The amnesiac Mueller was discredited to the point of embarrassment in his congressional testimony. James Comey’s machinations finally entrapped him in a web of deceit and partisanship. Andrew McCabe committed career suicide by lying on at least three occasions to federal officials and allegedly co-dreaming up the ridiculous “wire” caper with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to secretly tape the President of the United States in efforts to prove him unhinged and thus to remove him via the 25th Amendment.
FBI counsel James Baker was instrumental in trying to seed the fake dossier with the media before resigning and being hired by Twitter for a multimillion-dollar salary as deputy general counsel. Twitter, remember, was contracted in 2020 by the FBI to help suppress news accounts deemed unfavorable to the Biden project. Adam Schiff’s House Intelligence Committee’s “minority report” on collusion is now regarded as one of utter fantasy, despite being treated at its release as the final word on collusion.
Disinformation about Disinformation
Given the sordid Russia! Russia! conduct of 2016, one would have thought the left would have dropped the “collusion” caper. But instead, like an addict, they resumed their fixation again in 2020—as “collusion” now transmogrified into “disinformation.” When Hunter Biden abandoned his Biden-incriminating laptop at a repair shop and its contents reached the media, despite the best efforts of the FBI to suppress it, the administrative state went into action with another Russia! Russia! hoax.
Another member of the current Biden national security team (is there a pattern here?), current Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, called up former acting CIA Director Michael Morrell to round up more than 50 former senior intelligence officials and “authorities” to sign and release on October 19—just three days before the final Biden-Trump debate and less than three weeks before Election Day—a collective letter. In it, the signed “experts” claimed that the released emails on Hunter Biden’s laptop (it was then currently in FBI possession and the agency knew it was genuine) had “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”
Only it had none....................
That was a demonstrable lie and soon proved to be—but only conveniently after the election. Note that no one in the FBI challenged that accusation despite, again, being in possession of the contents of the laptop. The laptop farce enabled Joe Biden three days later to assert in the debate:
“There are 50 former national intelligence folks who said that what he’s accusing me of is a Russian plant. They have said that this has all the … five former heads of the CIA, both parties, say what he’s saying is a bunch of garbage. Nobody believes it except him and his good friend, Rudy Giuliani.”
Biden failed to remind Trump that his own campaign flack, Blinken, had helped to cook up the entire scheme to arm Biden in the debate.
Two years later, in August 2022, the Technometrica Institute of Policy and Politics polled 1,335 adults and found that almost four out of five Americans who reported that they followed the elected felt that an honest reporting of the laptop scandal would have altered the result of the 2020 presidential election.
Seventy-four percent of those polled felt that the FBI had deliberately misled the public when it falsely claimed that the laptop was part of Russian “disinformation.” Note that the FBI went further still, enlisting Twitter and other social media platforms before the election to censor any news account that accurately stated the laptop was authentic.
Note also that Hunter and his lawyers, in surreal fashion, are currently suing the repairman for “invasion of privacy” violations—without admitting that Hunter’s laptop is Hunter’s laptop. Hunter, in interviews, has not denied it was his, only that he was unsure. Yet he would never deny his ownership under oath, since he knows it is demonstrably his laptop, along with the contents inside it. So exposing his own abandoned laptop is an “invasion of privacy,” but Hunter does not claim the laptop is or is not his?
No “authority” who signed the letter—not John Brennan, not James Clapper, not Leon Panetta—has ever apologized for spreading disinformation on the eve of a debate and election to alter the results.
For a party that lectures ad nauseam about saving democracy and “election interference,” it is hard to imagine greater interference than a campaign rounding up sympathetic intelligence authorities to mislead the country to warp an election, even as the FBI and social media were doing the same work through censoring news accounts.
What was Russian Reset?
But who exactly did go soft on Putin’s dictatorship?
On March 6, 2009, in Geneva, to great fanfare, Hillary Clinton, the U.S. Secretary of State, gave Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov a red plastic button with the word “reset” in English and, sort of, in Russian, to mark a supposed new partnership. The Obama administration subtext was that the prior militarist, President George W. Bush, had reacted too strongly to the 2008 Russian invasion of Georgia over territorial disputes in Ossetia. Indeed, for years after, Hillary Clinton characterized the appeasement of Putin that followed as a “brilliant stroke.”
Yet the story of reset for the next five years was serial U.S. concessions to Putin coupled with naïve expectations of Russian reform. Five years later, Vice President Joe Biden admitted that ‘reset’ was an utter failure, given the 2014 Russian invasions of the Donbass and the Crimea, serial Russian hacking of American institutions, and Russian buzzing of American planes and ships. Vladimir Putin had adjudicated the Obama/Biden naivete as frailty to be manipulated rather than an olive branch to be reciprocated.
Or, as Biden put it:
“All of us, we all invested in a type of Russia we hoped—and still hope—will emerge one day: a Russia integrated into the world economy; more prosperous, more invested in the international order.”
Recall the now-infamous Obama hot mic exchange in Seoul, South Korea, in March 2012, an election year, with then-Russian President Dmitri Medvedev. The latter is now known mostly in the West as Putin’s obsequious megaphone, who routinely threatens Ukraine, Europe, and the United States with nuclear retaliation. Obama, in his message to Putin, seemed to assume reset still constituted quid pro quo understandings, as the transcript of the hoc mic exchange demonstrates:
Obama: “On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved, but it’s important for him to give me space.”
Medvedev: “Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…”
Obama: “This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility.”
Medvedev: “I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir.”
Despite all the “fact checker” denials, what is often missed is that the proposed bargain was more than met: Obama continued to dismantle plans for Eastern European-American cooperation to protect from long- and short-range missiles, and so was more than “flexible” on killing a project that might well have given the Europeans some peace of mind after the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
In exchange, Putin cooperated by giving Obama “space” during his “last election” by not humiliating his foreign policy failures by invading yet another one of Russia’s neighbors. But after Obama was reelected and after missile defense was cancelled, Putin felt unbound again and invaded both Crimea and the Donbass in 2014, correctly expecting no retaliation at all.
Obama-Biden versus Trump on Russia
Amid all the narratives of Trump’s “collusion” and collaboration with Putin, there remains one truth that not even the postmodern media can erase. Putin invaded his neighbors in 2008, 2014, and 2022, or in three out of the last four administrations, but, notably, not during the Trump years of 2017-21.
Trump had killed more Russian combatants—perhaps 300 of the Wagner group mercenaries in Syria—than at any time during the Cold War. In August 2019, Trump withdrew American participation from the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty on grounds—supported by the Europeans—that Russians had repeatedly violated the agreements without serious American objections.
Trump sanctioned the Nord Stream 2 pipeline and warned the Germans that their dependency on Russian natural gas was self-defeating and undermined NATO solidarity. Such sanctions were overturned quickly once Biden entered office.
Trump sold offensive weapons—javelins included—to Ukraine, weapons systems previously tabled by Obama. In 2021, Biden froze $100 million in military aid to Ukraine, including offensive weaponry, after falling for Putin’s feints and lies that he was drawing down Russian troops from the Ukrainian border.
Biden, remember, asked Putin not to hack American humanitarian institutions. He said his reaction to a Putin invasion would hinge on whether it was a major or minor one, and offered to fly Ukrainian President Zelensky out of Kyiv when the Russians attacked.
Trump’s ‘drill baby, drill’ policy of flooding markets with cheap petroleum crashed the world price and cut deeply into Russian export income. In 2018, Trump hit more Russian officials, oligarchs, and companies with new sanctions.
One might conclude that Putin enjoys trash-talking and sermonizing American presidents who are careful never to confront him, while he is more wary of unpredictable presidents who say occasional nice things about him, even while they make his agendas impossible to implement.
2024..............................
As this year’s election nears, expect the Russia! Russia! fantasies to heat up again to mask a failing administration and its indefensible record of a lethally open border, inflation, crime waves, foreign policy implosions, crackpot energy agendas, the weaponization of our institutions, and deteriorating race relations.
Tumblr media
Russia Russia Russia.....Marsha, Marsha, Marsha!!!
Tumblr media
0 notes
abcnewspr · 1 year
Text
'THIS WEEK' CO-ANCHOR AND ABC NEWS CHIEF GLOBAL AFFAIRS CORRESPONDENT MARTHA RADDATZ HITS THE ROAD AHEAD OF THE 2024 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
Full Interviews Will Air on ‘This Week with George Stephanopoulos’ on Sunday, Aug. 27 
Tumblr media
ABC News/”This Week with George Stephanopoulos” 
“This Week with George Stephanopoulos” co-anchor and ABC News chief global affairs correspondent Martha Raddatz is on the ground in key states on the road to 2024.  
In South Carolina, an early test in the Republican nomination contest, Raddatz interviews Republican Rep. Nancy Mace and Democratic Rep. Jim Clyburn about the stakes of the race and turning out voters. Plus, professor Gibbs Knotts of the College of Charleston shares his analysis of the Palmetto State’s landscape and what to expect in the months to come.  
In Georgia, a decisive state during the 2020 race that’s set to be a battleground again next year, Raddatz interviews Cliff Albright, co-founder and executive director of Black Voters Matter, and Patricia Murphy, political columnist for The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Raddatz also hears reactions from attendees watching the first 2024 GOP presidential debate at an event hosted by the Cobb County Young Republicans. 
“This Week with George Stephanopoulos” airs Sunday, Aug. 27, on ABC.  
*COPYRIGHT ©2023 American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. All photography is copyrighted material and is for editorial use only. Images are not to be archived, altered, duplicated, resold, retransmitted or used for any other purposes without written permission of ABC. Images are distributed to the press in order to publicize current programming. Any other usage must be licensed. Photos posted for Web use must be at the low resolution of 72dpi, no larger than 2x3 in size. 
ABC News Media Relations   
Alisa Vasquez  
-- ABC -- 
0 notes
stephonblogtmu · 1 year
Text
Tutorial Assignment 5
Disinformation: EMA admits COVID Vaccination causes Infertility:
Tumblr media
https://hyp.is/ZmFuzgGgEe6yGWc-6ixhJA/expose-news.com/2023/05/30/ema-admits-covid-vaccine-causes-infertility/
This online article was published by an anti-vaccination website called “expose-news.com,” which reports that the Covid-19 vaccinations cause infertility. According to the article, it suggests that “shedding” of the Covid-19 vaccine can happen through skin-to-skin contact or breathing the same air as a vaccinated person, thus leading to a “menstrual cycle disruption” that will cause miscarriages among pregnant women. This online article is evidently false as the information it promotes does not align with the factual information posted by health institutions such as the National Institutes of Health and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which clearly state that the Covid-19 vaccine does not affect fertility. Moreover, the article also has a donation link on its webpage that might trick people into donating money since they might feel a sense of gratitude for being able to view “authentic and real” information. Nevertheless, the information promoted in the Covid-19 vaccine article by expose-news.com is intentionally false and designed to cause harm by spreading unnecessary fear about potential infertility from the Covid-19 vaccines. An attentive reader can differentiate between false and real information in this article by simply searching through the web for similar posts regarding infertility from Covid-19 vaccines as I did by looking at information from the NIH and CDC. Mal-information: Hillary Clinton emails - what's it all about?
Tumblr media
https://hyp.is/dFRyTAGgEe6e-u-CeAYkYQ/www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-31806907
The BBC published a news article on November 6th, 2016, that addressed information regarding emails that were leaked from Hillary Clinton by Russian hackers. During Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign in 2016, a group of Russian hackers infiltrated and comprised her email account by exposing her private email server to the public. The Russian hackers intentionally hacked Hillary Clinton’s email and exposed her private server with the goal of ruining her presidential campaign, which they ultimately succeeded in since the damage was devastating and caused her to lose in the presidential election. Overall, this post by the BBC is a form of mal-information in the sense that if it had been for the Russian hackers releasing confidential details about Hillary Clinton’s emails, then the topic of Hillary Clinton having her own private server to view government emails would not be published and she might’ve had a chance in the 2016 presidential election. An attentive reader can determine that this article is a form of mal-information by asking themselves whether or not Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign would have been a success if the Russian hackers did not interfere with and leaked her private email server.
Misinformation: Actor Woody Harrelson Believes that 5G is to blame for the Coronavirus spreading.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
https://hyp.is/F5CnUAGmEe6wNyfatl0B3Q/twitter.com/broderick/status/1245550744738070528
In this Twitter post, a person calls out famous actor Woody Harrelson on his claims that 5G is responsible for the spreading of the Coronavirus. According to health institutes such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the coronavirus likely originated in bats and was transmitted to humans through an intermediate animal host. In the case of Woody Harrelson’s post regarding 5G causing the spread of the Coronavirus, it is obviously false but due to the high tensions and fears in the early development of the virus outbreak in 2019, the urge for answers about why and how it was spreading is understandable since everyone was jumping to conclusions, including Harrelson. Nevertheless, Woody Harrelson’s post contains false information, but it was not posted with the intention to be harmful since he was searching for possible answers to explain the disaster we currently undergo. An attentive reader can identify this online post as misinformation if they conduct background research to determine whether or not 5G is indeed the cause of the Coronavirus spreading. Moreover, it is also important that attentive readers grasp the feelings people might have been going through during the early stages of the virus outbreak, hence the reason for wild claims such as Woody Harrelson’s 5G belief.
0 notes
lboogie1906 · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
Oprah Gail Winfrey (born Orpah Gail Winfrey; January 29, 1954) is a talk show host, television producer, actress, author, and philanthropist. She is known for her talk show, The Oprah Winfrey Show, which was the highest-rated television program of its kind in history and ran for 25 years. Dubbed the "Queen of All Media," she was the richest African-American of the 20th century, was once the world's only black billionaire, and was the greatest black philanthropist in US history. She was sometimes ranked as the most influential woman in the world. She reinvented her show with a focus on literature, self-improvement, mindfulness, and spirituality. She had emerged as a political force, with her endorsement of President Barack Obama. She was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom and received honorary doctorate degrees from Duke and Harvard. She formed her network, the Oprah Winfrey Network. Credited with creating a more intimate, confessional form of media communication, she popularized and revolutionized the tabloid talk show genre. She was inducted into the National Women's Hall of Fame. She has won many accolades throughout her career which includes 18 Daytime Emmy Awards, including the Lifetime Achievement Award and the Chairman's Award, two Primetime Emmy Awards, including the Bob Hope Humanitarian Award, a Tony Award, a Peabody Award, and the Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award, awarded by the Academy Awards and two additional Academy Award nominations. She was elected as a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. She co-starred in The Color Purple, Women of Brewster’s Place, The Butler, and A Wrinkle in Time. She was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress. She produced and starred in the film Beloved. Harpo Productions released a film adaptation of Their Eyes Were Watching God. Her company Harpo Films signed an exclusive output pact to develop and produce scripted series, documentaries, and movies exclusively for HBO. She voiced Gussie the goose in Charlotte's Web, Judge Bumbleton in Bee Movie, and Eudora in The Princess and the Frog and lent her voice in Crow: The Legend. #africanhistory365 #africanexcellence https://www.instagram.com/p/CoAYAiaraFF/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=
0 notes
tmuobradb · 2 years
Text
CEID- 100 - Module 5
Disinformation:
An example of disinformation I found on the internet occurred way back in 2016, and this was when a Pizza shop was falsely accused of a pedophile sex ring involving Hilary Clinton. There were multiple tweets about these accusations which had no proof whatsoever, rather were just made to spread fake news about an upcoming candidate for the presidential election in the US. Slowly but surely these tweets caught fire and the attention of many, which raised many questions and eyebrows about this pizza place and its connections to the pedophilia of children. Thus on December 4, 2016, a shooter entered the Pizza shop to investigate the scene with a rifle. Fortunately, no harm was done in terms of physical violence, as not only was he arrested, but the allegations were completely false. But it was a close scenario where people could have gotten hurt over something they had zero knowledge about.  Thus people on the internet must be careful and very suspicious of all information read on the web, especially when it contains no proof whatsoever, political people and an unverified source tweet it.
Misinformation:
Recently in the Football World, one of the most sought-after players has come under a wave of rumours and information that has been leaked by sources. After just signing a new contract worth hundreds of millions of dollars, the player is looking to force a move away from his current club after being “unhappy”. According to the reports, Kylian Mbappe feels like he has made a “mistake” and that “promises” have been broken, which were made when he signed that contract. However, just recently multiple people have come out that are very close to Mbappe and have stated that these are just all lies and rumours. Even Mbappe has gotten into the mix, as the whole footballing world erupted hearing these rumours, and during the Ballan Dor ceremony that was just recently hosted, he stated that these are all just lies and that he is very happy at Paris Saint Germain. This is an example of Misinformation, and it happens every day, especially for people of higher “value” such as athletes, politicians, etc. It is very hard to identify when this information is true and when it is not unless the actual person or place this type of information comes out and states the opposite. However, by finding and following the right journalists, media members, etc that hold high credibility and are usually right, you will decrease the chance of reading misinformation. 
Mal-information:
One example I believe fits in Mal- information is one that was on all social media platforms and that has gone viral. And that was the Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard Case, which was broadcasted on almost every single platform at the time, and has racked in hundreds of millions of views together. During this case, both sides had great deals of information that was, in reality, true, however in the bigger picture. Both sides would cut off specific pieces of information, and use those against the other to win the case. However, even if both Johnny and Amber used these tactics, one thing stood out to me which was proven false, and that was the alleged Johnny Depp physical violence on Amber Heard. Amber Heard “leaked” the videos back in 2015 talking about how Johnny had physically hurt her and left multiple marks on her face and body. At the time there was no proof or evidence that Johnny could use to defend himself, which caused a social media backlash, and Johnny was taken to court and was “canceled” However, just recently Johnny Depp used both the social media platform and the all the evidence we able to get to show in court that although Johnny did do some disturbing things and did show acts of violence, he never physically touched Amber Heard violently, and that was proven through multiple pieces of evidence (For all we know). Thus it is important to always look at all the evidence that is there to offer, and not to jump to conclusions right away before official hearings and information come out. This is quite hard to do in today's age and social media, where things go viral in a matter of minutes and everyone talks about it.
Link:
0 notes
askrolli · 2 years
Text
Nicole wallace michael schmidt
Tumblr media
#NICOLE WALLACE MICHAEL SCHMIDT MOVIE#
In addition, in 2008, the former couple worked on John McCain’s presidential campaign. Nicole and Mark have one child, Liam, whom they welcomed into the world in 2012. The couple had an instant connection and married in 2005. They met in 2000, while Sarah was covering the Florida vote recount and Mark was working for President George W. Mark Wallace, a financial and legal advisor, was Nicole Wallace’s husband. Is Michael Schmidt and Nicolle Wallace dating? Let’s have a look. Nicolle is about to divorce her 14-year marriage to Mark Wallace and is dating her new love, Michael Schmidt.ĭue to their appearances on her television show, Deadline: White House, Nicolle, and her new partner Wallace have become household names.įor her fans, though, seeing them come out as a couple was a first. Schmidt, a Pulitzer Prize-winning writer, New York Times correspondent, and author. Nicolle has recently been a media darling thanks to her friendship with Michale S. Bush, has recently become a significant topic in the tabloid press. White Home had a complete of two million viewers in July 2020, and the subsequent month, the present ran for 2 hours.Nicolle Wallace, the former White House Communications Director under former US President George W. In the identical manner, Wallace has been the host of MSNBC’s afternoon information and commentary present Deadline: White Home since Could 9, 2017. She is a frequent contributor and visitor host on NBC’s At this time Present and MSNBC’s The eleventh Hour with Brian Williams and Morning Joe. Wallace joined NBC Information and MSNBC, which is a part of NBC Information, as a political analyst.
#NICOLE WALLACE MICHAEL SCHMIDT MOVIE#
In response to Movie star Web Value, Nicolle Wallace is price about $3 million. Throughout her time on TV, she made $3 million In response to the couple’s buddies, Mark and Nicolle had been dwelling aside for a yr earlier than they bought a divorce. The article stated that they each needed to interrupt up, but it surely didn’t say why they did. Web page Six reported in March 2019 that Nicolle and Mark had break up up due to this. Supreme Court docket a authorized cause why same-sex marriage needs to be authorized. Mark and Nicolle have been in control of John McCain’s 2008 presidential marketing campaign. In 2012, that they had a child boy named Liam. Mark and Nicolle preferred one another, so in 2005 they bought married. Mark Wallace was President Bush’s basic counsel in Florida throughout his run for the White Home. In 2000, Nicolle and her ex-husband Mark met whereas she was protecting the Florida recount for the presidential election. She break up up with Mark Wallance in 2019 earlier than she began courting Michael Schmidt can be well-known for exposing Russian meddling within the 2016 elections and breaking the story of Hillary Clinton’s secret e-mails. Since Michael usually seems on Nicolle’s present, the 2 felt they needed to inform MSNBC about their relationship. A spokesperson for MSNBC instructed Web page Six that solely shut members of the family have been on the wedding ceremony.Īdditionally, individuals say that the couple dated for 3 years earlier than getting married. The supply additionally says that Nicolle wore a marriage band to work when she went again. Web page Six says that they bought married on April 2, 2022. Schmidt Again in Marchįolks have regarded on-line for a very long time to seek out the marriage pictures of Wallace and her husband, Michael Schmidt. I don’t have an opinion on that as a result of I must study and perceive individuals who don’t agree with Donald Trump.” The marriage of an MSNBC anchor and her husband, Michael S. “From the standpoint of my dad and mom, Donald Trump needs to be on Mount Rushmore. However her dad and mom are robust supporters of Trump. Wallace says that she is a registered Republican however doesn’t act like one. She grew to become a fierce opponent of Trump, and she or he nonetheless criticizes his presidency to this present day. Nicolle’s political beliefs modified lots throughout President Trump’s election marketing campaign. She was a loyal Republican earlier than it, however she wasn’t pleased with a number of issues concerning the 2008 marketing campaign. Wallace’s political beliefs started to alter as she labored for John McCain’s 2008 presidential marketing campaign. Her father bought outdated issues, and her mom taught college. She was the oldest of her dad and mom’ 4 children. Nicolle grew up within the Orinda neighborhood of San Francisco. Nicolle Wallace Nicolle Wallace’s dad and mom and she or he have completely different political beliefs
Tumblr media
0 notes
cksmart-world · 2 years
Text
       SMART BOMB
The completely unnecessary news analysis
by Christopher Smart
October 11, 2022
WHITE ON RICE TO BUGS ON STINK
When Mister Nice Guy, aka Gov. Spencer Cox, goes off, you know it's gotta be bad. Check this out: “Cable media is evil. CNN, Fox News, MSNBC… They are all evil. They have psychologists that help them program stuff to keep you addicted to what [Harvard professor] Arthur Brooks calls contempt,” he said, according to The Salt Lake Tribune. You're right, Wilson, he's not all wrong. Watching any TV news is... well, pretty sucky. But watching hour upon hour of bad news often reported without proper context will drive most people criminally insane. Still, comparing CNN and MSNBC to the Murdoch B.S. Machine —Fox — is like equating white on rice to bugs on stink. For example, Dominion Voting systems is suing Fox for 1.6 billion for broadcasting over and over that its voting machines discarded Trump's votes or transferred them to Biden in the 2020 election. It's hard to un-ring that bell once millions of viewers have heard it time and again. After tracking Fox broadcasts, Media Matters For America reported this: “Fox News viewers are subjected to a constant torrent of lies, misleading statements, and half-truths as the network's hosts, guests, and on-air personalities weave a comprehensive web of misinformation...” Actually, Wilson, bugs on stink would be an improvement.
LOCK THEIR BUTTS UP!
In our quest to do away with homeless people, our brothers and sisters at the Pioneer Park Coalition have hit on a “compassionate” solution: They can get off the streets or find their butts in jail. The Salt Lake Tribune calls the Pioneer Park Coalition a “consortium of businesses and advocates,” which sounds very warm and fuzzy. And they are freakin' sick and tired of homeless people screwing up the ambience and jaywalking and not adhering to standard grooming and dress codes — it's bad for business. Last week, in what has been called a new approach, the coalition outlined a three-point plan that would fix just about everything — reducing serious crime and public urination. The plan would provide more housing and services (why didn't we think of that?); making the miscreants “accountable” (somehow); and strictly enforcing laws and arresting those losers if they don't get it together. In essence, homelessness would be illegal. Letting them sleep on the streets isn't charitable, said Brother Scott Howell. They should be where they can get medical and mental healthcare. “Put them in jail, that's the solution.” Of couse, there's no room at the jail and medical and mental healthcare are woefully lacking, but at least the coalition isn't offering empty promises like those real homeless care providers.
DENIERS, DENIERS, PANTS ON FIRES
So, what exactly is an “election denier?” No,Wilson, only some of them wear tin-foil hats and believe the earth is flat. The easy explanation is they believe the “Big Lie” that Donald Trump won the last presidential election because he said so. “We won big!” Why they believe him remains mysterious — it's as weird as Mormons insisting Harry Potter isn't really into wizardry and witchcraft. Some believe Trump's victory was thwarted by a conspiracy involving disappearing ink and Italian satellites. But no less than 60 courts tossed Trumpist claims that the election was fixed because there is no evidence — none. Still, some two-thirds of Republicans say Biden won by fraud. It's magical thinking, of course, kinda like believing Mike Lee is a Constitutional expert and the United States is not a democracy. As Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels said: “A lie told once remains a lie but a lie told a thousand times becomes the truth.” The 300 or so Republican election deniers running for Congress and important statewide offices know the Big Lie is Big B.S. It's a Trump litmus test, pure and simple: You can kiss the emperor's ring or suffer the consequences. But not everyone believes the emperor has new clothes and they desperately wish he would get some— bright orange jumpsuits.
Post script — That's a wrap for another awesome autumn week here at Smart Bomb where we keep track of Republican racism so you don't have to. At a recent Trump rally, Alabama Sen. Tommy Tuberville described all African-Americans as criminals. Democrats want reparations for descendants of slavery, he said, “because they think the people who do crime are owed that." Yep, Wilson, he actually said that. In a poll conducted by the Public Religion Research Institute, where a score of 1.0 is extremely racist and 0 is not racist at all, the Republican median score was 0.67, compared to 0.45 for independents and 0.27 for Democrats. “Put differently, Republicans are much more likely to buy into the notion that Whites are victims,” said the study's authors. By the way, Mormons median score was 0.55 — just a little racist. White evangelical Christians scored 0.64 — no, Wilson, don't ask, what would Jesus do? White Republican men who dominate the Utah Legislature insist that racism no longer exists, so they quickly passed a resolution against the teaching of Critical Race Theory (CRT) in public schools even though they didn't have a clue what it is. After all, we don't want kids learning about slavery and institutional racism — they could turn out to be Democrats.
On second thought, Wilson, maybe we should ask what Jesus would do. What would he think if he showed up today and saw these so-called Christians who are wrapped up in fear and loathing. We know the band isn't religious, but we're betting you and the guys have just the right thing to steady our nerves, if not save our souls:
Jesus was a Capricorn He ate organic food He believed in love and peace And never wore no shoes Long hair, beard and sandals And a funky bunch of friends Reckon we'd just nail him up If he came down again 'Cause everybody's gotta have somebody to look down on Prove they can be better than at any time they choose Someone doin' somethin' dirty decent folks can frown on If you can't find nobody else, then help yourself to me Eggheads fussin' rednecks cussin' Hippies for their hair Others laugh at straights who laugh at Freaks who laugh at squares Some folks hate the Whites Who hate the Blacks who hate the Klan Most of us hate anything that We don't understand
(Jesus Was a Capricorn (Owed to John Prine) — Kris Kristofferson)
0 notes
moyalucom · 2 years
Text
Introduction To Domain Names and Web Hosting
Introduction To Domain Names and Web Hosting
Before you can get started in your venture to make some additional easy cash online you should understand a little bit about how domain-names and web hosting works. I will also talk about free hosting solutions which you can use and are perfectly OK to help you start off without having to pay for domains and hosting. A domain name in simple terms is a name in which you kind in to your web browser…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes