Describing Voices
Inspired by this old post
Words (and definitions) as text below cut.
Words to Describe a Voice
Adenoidal: pinched and nasal in tone
Alto: a low female voice, or a high male voice
Appealing: evoking interest, desire, or curiosity; attractive
Austere: severe, uncompromising, or strict; sober, or serious
Baritone: an intermediate male voice, between tenor and bass
Booming: a deep, resonant sound; prolonged or echoing
Breathy: audible, or excessive, emission of breath
Coarse: harsh, or grating; vulgar, obscene, or crude
Croaky: low-pitched and hoarse; croaking
Deep: low in pitch; sonorous tone
Ethereal: light, airy, or tenuous; extremely delicate or refined
Falsetto: an unnaturally, or artificially, high-pitched voice
Frail: delicate, weak, or fragile
Grating: irritating, unpleasant, harsh, discordant, or rasping
Gravelly: harsh and grating
Guttural: harsh, or throaty; sounds formed in back of mouth
High-Pitched: high in volume and/or tone
Hoarse: a low, harsh sound; husky; weak intensity and excessive breathiness
Honeyed: pleasantly soft; dulcet, or mellifluous; flattering, or ingratiating
Husky: a somewhat hoarse, semi-whispered vocal tone
Hypnotic: inducing, or tending to induce, sleep; soporific
Lilting: rhythmic; light and tripping
Lofty: elevated; arrogant or condescending
Low: quiet or deep
Luscious: sweet to excess; highly pleasing; satisfying; cloying
Lyrical: enthusiastic; effusive; melodious; musical
Majestic: lofty, imposing, stately, or grand
Mellow: mild and pleasant; relaxed; soft and rich
Melodic: sweet-sounding; musical
Mesmerizing: completely engrossing, captivating, or fascinating
Musical: resembling music; melodious; harmonious
Nasal: sounds, either partly or entirely, form the noise
Orotund: strong, full, rich, or clear; pompous or bombastic
Plaintive: sorrowful; melancholic; mournful
Plummy: rich, or mellowly, resonant
Raspy: harsh, grating, rasping, or irritating
Resonant: deep and full of resonance; reverberating
Rich: full, strong, deep, or vivid
Ringing: clear, resonant; reminiscent of bells
Scratchy: uneven, irritating, or grating
Shrill: high-pitched and piercing
Silvery: having a clear, ringing sound
Small: humble, weak, soft, or of little strength or force
Smoky: hazy, hoarse, husky, or raspy
Soft-Spoken: soft, gentle, or mild; persuasive
Soporific: causing, or tending to cause, sleep
Squeaky: sharp, shrill, high-pitched
Strong: robust; powerful; intense in quality
Sweet: pleasing to the ear; delicate, or agreeable
Tenor: an intermediate male voice between bass and alto
Thick: husky, or hoarse; not distinctly articulated
Thin: lacking fullness or volume; weak, or shrill
Throaty: guttural, husky, or hoarse
Tight: drawn, tense, or taut
Weak: lacking in force; soft, deficient, or quiet
Wheezy: with a whistling sound, and difficulty breathing
Words to Describe Tone of Voice
Affected: false, or feigned; pretending to possess
Arrogant: overbearing, assuming, insolently proud
Authoritative: positive, peremptory, or dictatorial
Bloodcurdling: arousing terror; horrifying
Boisterous: rough and noisy, rowdy, unrestrained; noisily jolly
Breaking: changing, or collapsing, suddenly
Bright: animated, lively, cheerful, clever, or witty
Brittle: fragile, frail, lacking warmth; having a sharp, tense quality
Cacophonous: having a harsh, or discordant sound
Caterwauling: long and wailing; a howl, or screech
Cheery: in good spirits; cheerful, or happy
Delicate: soft, or faint; subtle; tactful, or cautious
Dry: plain, unadorned, indifferent, or matter-of-fact
Dulcet: pleasant to the ear; melodious
Ear-Splitting: extremely harsh and irritating; loud
Enthusiastic: lively, ardent, eager, or passionate
Faint: soft, weak, feeble, or slight; lacking clearness or volume
Feeble: lacking in force, strength, volume, and distinctness
Flat: without modification or variation; without vitality
Forceful: powerful, vigorous, or effective
Frank: direct and unreserved; straightforward; sincere
Gruff: low and harsh; hoarse; rough, brusque, or surly
Hesitant: wavering, irresolute, timid, or unpersuasive
Insincere: lacking sincerity; sarcastic; hypocritical
Irreverent: lacking respect; flippant
Monotone: single tone, without harmony or variation
Patronizing: offensive and condescending
Pedantic: overly concerned with details and rules
Petulant: impatient irritation; annoyed
Piercing: loud, or shrill; sarcastic, or caustic
Pompous: ostentatious display of self-importance
Pontificating: to speak in a pompous or dogmatic manner
Pretentious: making an exaggerated outward show; ostentatious
Raised: increased in volume
Raucous: harsh, strident, or grating; rowdy, or disorderly
Respectful: showing deference; politeness
Rough: harsh to the ear; grating, or jarring
Sarcastic: using harsh or bitter derision or irony
Screeching: harshly shrill
Serious: grave, somber, earnest, or sincere
Singsong: rhythmically monotonous cadence or tone
Smug: contentedly confident in superiority or correctness
Snarky: testy or irritable; having a rudely critical tone
Snobby: condescending, patronizing; snobbish
Soft: low, or subdued; gentle and melodious
Sotto Voce: in a low, soft voice, so as not to be overheard
Stilted: stiffly dignified or formal; pompous
Strangled: choking, or stifled; gradually cut off
Sullen: gloomy, irritated, morose, or malignant
Trembling: shaking, as from fear, excitement, or weakness
Unapologetic: bold, and showing no regret
Upbeat: optimistic, happy, or cheerful
Warbling: with trills, quavers, or melodic embellishments
Wavering: unsteady, shaky, or fluctuating; begin to fail
Whiny: complaining, fretful, or cranky
Whisper: to speak with soft, hushed sounds
3K notes
·
View notes
Hi, asking because I recently got some feedback on my writing that I'm not sure how to process:
So I read a group a snippet from my manuscript in beta, and one person gave me some light criticism about the narrator. The book is close first person from the POV of a college-aged bookworm, though that scene doesn't really focus on her book reading or education. This person told me that my use of words like "verdant" or "penultimate" didn't fit with her dialogue in the moment. I got a bit defensive and clarified that she is established as well-read, so he let it go. (He also questioned why characters in 1945 were drinking Champagne out of coupes and not flutes, granted.) But that did send me on a bit of an anxiety spiral, so I have to ask... When is fancy language too much?
I genuinely don't know. I use words like "perchance" and "superfluous" and "ergo" in my daily conversations; I'm just naturally wordy. And people have told me as a kid to tone with the language because it makes me sound pretentious. It might just be me being autistic and not understanding conversational mores, but it does make one worry.
How do you tone down fancy language when it comes naturally to you? Or am I just needlessly worrying?
I know that this isn't exactly the question that you're asking, but it seems to me that there are two issues here: is using "fancy" language something that must be toned down in writing and if so how, and did the language the character was using match the context in which they were speaking?
To answer the first one, which seems to be your question, language like that isn't inherently bad if it's the language that the character would use. You are allowed to make specific linguistic choices for your character, and it seems like you're doing that here. But if you feel like you want/need to, I would look at other dialogue and listen to poeple speak. What words are they using in place of words like perchance or ergo? How are they phrasing things instead?
You probably need to do this anyway--unless all of your characters have the same background/education/etc (and honestly even then), they won't all be speaking the same way, so you should be varying your dialogue.
But now for the other part: from your description (and obviously you know better than I do), it seems like the comment isn't necessarily "I don't know if this character would ever use these words" as "there feels like a mismatch between this specific word choice and the broader dialogue in this scene."
And that is absolutely an idea worth looking into. You may ultimately decide that you disagree, but I wouldn't dismiss off-hand the idea that the reader is feeling cognitive dissonance when reading dialogue. That's the sort of thing that will jar a reader out of your story, which you generally want to avoid.
What is it that makes the reader feel like there's a mismatch? Is the dialogue otherwise crude or rough? Is everyone else using very different linguistic patterns? Is the character having an emotional outpouring that may feel academic to the reader because of the longer/more "well-educated" word choice?
These are all points that are valid and worth looking into.
I also just want to say--I wouldn't extrapolate a beta reader getting a historical fact about champagne consumption wrong out to them not having any worthy comments. I totally understand getting defensive about your work (I think ever writer does) but dismissing them out of hand because of a random factual error does you no favors.
13 notes
·
View notes