Tumgik
#zhang sanjian exposes
bluebirdmuppet · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
A post about how a shit stain waste of space @ajawrites @bookshop attacked fans of Gong Jun and Zhang Zhehan in an article she wrote for @vox, and then went on to slander and defame Zhang Zhehan in an attempt to get the only article published about his cancellation by CAPA retracted.
Here's the context: On June 6, 2022, @vox published an article written by @ajawrites @bookshop claiming that fans of Gong Jun and Zhang Zhehan are "conspiracy theorists". In it, she makes all types of claims defaming myself and the entire JunZhe fandom (both here and in China) for being conspiracy theorists because we do not believe Zhang Zhehan's Instagram account is controlled by him. For those who don't know, Instagram fraud is rampant and there have been several Chinese celebrities who have been the victim of this. Zhang Zhehan's solo fans encouraged the reposting of this article and defended it because they somehow believe that Zhang Zhehan would "comeback" on an international platform before his name is cleared in China (another story for another day).
On June 14, 2022, less than one week after the publication of that article, The China Story published an article about why Zhang Zhehan was cancelled, and specifically that a non-governmental organization called the China Association of Performing Arts (CAPA) was behind the cancellation, not the Chinese government. It also described the efforts made by Li Xuezheng, a famous government-affiliated director, to clear his name. To my knowledge, this is the only story in the world to shine a light on CAPA's role in Zhang Zhehan's cancellation.
After this article was published, @ajawrites @bookshop wrote a long email to the China Story on June 18, 2022 seeking that the article be retracted. She claimed she had done "research" which showed that the article was part of a conspiracy theory (false), that Zhang Zhehan's family was linked to Japan (false), that Zhang Zhehan was cancelled by the government (false), that CAPA wasn't involved (false), and that all those who believe they are are "conspiracy theorists" (false). She repeats anti talking points to smear Zhang Zhehan in an attempt to obtain a retraction of the article.
Yes, @ajawrites @bookshop attempted to get the only article in the world that described CAPA in a negative light retracted.
Tumblr media
We have a copy of the email. Here are some excerpts of her own words.
Here's @ajawrites @bookshop insinuating that Zhang Zhehan was banned by the government, when it has been proven on multiple occasions that the government did not ban Zhang Zhehan.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
A writer who cannot even get this fact right does not deserve to be called a writer or a thinking human being.
Here's @ajawrites @bookshop claiming that Zhang Zhehan has family ties to Japan, which is FALSE.
Zhang Zhehan himself stated in his interview with Li Xuezheng on January 1, 2022 (seven months before this email) that this was not true. Yet, @ajawrites @bookshop continued to spread this smear to the editors of The China Story.
How does someone who is too lazy to confirm facts become a "culture writer" for @vox?
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Here's @ajawrites @bookshop claiming that their "research" shows that the public genuinely hated Zhang Zhehan. They claim that Zhang Zhehan was not cancelled by bad actors, but rather by the "public".
They ignore all the proof and statements that what happened was due to malicious competition and monopoly. All of this was readily available, had @ajawrites @bookshop actually done diligent research. Li Xuezheng had, after all, talked about it for weeks at the end of 2021 and early 2022.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
But of course @ajawrites @bookshop knows better! They know better than even Chinese people! They even know that CAPA is a government organization, when CAPA itself said that it is not government and does not represent government.
Pretty rich for white journalist @ajawrites @bookshop to claim that when Li Xuezheng, a renowned government affiliated film director, says that Zhang Zhehan's cancellation was not done by the Chinese government but instead by CAPA, he is spouting a "conspiracy theory".
@vox is this the type of sinophobic journalists that your publication now employs?
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Here's @ajawrites @bookshop defending CAPA by stating that it is not to blame for Zhang Zhehan's censorship from all media platforms in China.
Except they failed to read the multiple media reports indicating that CAPA had allied itself with multiple media platforms to ban those it deems "immoral". These media resources includes a western outlet, Reuters. Basic due diligence would have unearthed this, but it appears neither @ajawrites @bookshop or @vox care about the facts.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Here's @ajawrites @bookshop suggesting (as a white foreign writer with zero access to his case), that it is "unlikely" that Zhang Zhehan's investigation would go anywhere, that he can't come back, that he is "already back".
These are clear anti talking points easily found on Chinese social media.
Tumblr media
Of particular note is that @ajawrites @bookshop claims that these conclusions are a result of their "research". Yes in their own words, in 2020 they were just learning Chinese. With their level of genius, I bet they're not far from being a beginner.
Yet, this is the type of "expert" that @vox employs to write about Chinese fan culture.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
The article in China Story is one of the only published articles in the world that details how Zhang Zhehan was cancelled by CAPA, not the Chinese government. Yet @ajawrites @bookshop, great friend to Zhang Zhehan solo fans asked for a retraction.
Yes, we have the email. They actually did.
Who has incentive to take down an article that speaks negatively about CAPA? Who has incentive to water down statements negative to CAPA? Who has incentive to perpetuate smears against Zhang Zhehan internationally?
Who better to manipulate than a lazy and dumb writer like @ajawrites @bookshop
I do wonder how @vox and its advertisers feels about @ajawrites @bookshop spreading slander about a Chinese celebrity and his fandom? I wonder if @vox even bothers with basic fact-checking? I wonder if @vox is okay with one of its writers contacting another publication in an attempt to supports their biased views?
To the Zhang Zhehan fans (Zhang Sanjian believers) who have fawned at the feet of @ajawrites @bookshop: good to know that you support those who defend CAPA, the organization that cancelled Zhang Zhehan.
And one last thing to @ajawrites @bookshop: only a shit stain waste of space would write an article about a celebrity to gain a following in his fandom while actually despising him, believing the smears against him, and thinking he's a t******.
We call people like you blood sucking vampires.
277 notes · View notes
bizarrequazar · 2 years
Text
08-07 (CST) One CAPA Minion a Day Notes
In the first week of August, QuelleVous did one exposé a day on various social media accounts who are not who they claim to be, many of whom have promoted Zhang Sanjian. This was a space reviewing these exposés. [Recording]
[Flora’s relationships map that includes people discussed here]
QuelleVous wanted to choose people who are “closer to the core”, the ones who are more noteworthy and more harmful. Some were ones who people had requested to be exposed, others are ones who it was noticed popped up frequently.
Chinese fandom structure is taken from Korean and Japanese structure, beginning around 2013; they have huge economic impact within the entertainment industry.
It’s common for rival companies / stars to plant fake fans within fandom to cause chaos and scandals; they aren’t costly nor is it hard to find people willing to do it.
This is part of what is referred to when the government says they want to “clean up fandom behaviour.” 
Platforms don’t mind this sort of behaviour or care to regulate it because it gets them engagement—it’s profitable for them. 
Capital invests in stars --> stars bring attention --> attention brings capital.
After Li Xuezheng came out, it was apparent that Zhang Zhehan still had a fandom. Ergo, there was money there to be made.
Zhang Zhehan refused to prioritize capital and this sort of behaviour when he got popular, wanting to avoid losing his artistic integrity. He did not have strong backers as a result. 813 was likely to make an example of what they could do to people who said no, and the recent activity is them trying to get that capital for themselves.
It unfortunately seems like there is another goal in this: to destroy Gong Jun as well. Gong Jun is currently doing well for himself—there is monetary interest in taking him down.
After 813, there was a similar attack at the beginning of September against Gong Jun. This was not a coincidence. 
Nearly all the people QuelleVous exposed this week have been targetting Gong Jun, often with identical talking points.
Exposé #1
QuelleVous’s posts: [here] and [here]
This person was very focused on 6Rooms, which QuelleVous found odd as 6Rooms really isn’t an outlier in the industry.
He posts a lot of personal information very publicly, it wasn’t hard to find.
His mother is from the same area as Han Baowang and shares his uncommon surname. Both of them have similar bahaviour. 
Their families were found to have ties to each other, and also have ties to Weibo’s CEO.
He defended someone who actually did pray to Japanese war criminals. It’s possible he did this purposefully, so that people would think that him defending Zhang Zhehan was therefore evidence of Zhang Zhehan praying.
Lao Ahyi also gave him information on 6Rooms that he posted.
Brief Gen. Discussion
Li Xuezheng derailed their plan, so they tried to derail him by putting their people at the forefront. They took advantage of the overwhelming amount on information being shared to gain people’s trust—including Li Xuezheng’s.
6Rooms was thrown out as a distraction, though it has led to Songcheng’s connections being discovered (thanks Lao Ahyi).
Zhang Zhehan’s case at its simpliest is a defamation case, but all the rest of this makes it much more complicated, which prolongs the legal process. This is likely intentional.
The other purpose of these antis is to draw out people who defend Zhang Zhehan. They’re currently mocking Zhang Sanjian as Zhang Zhehan to make people defend Zhang Zhehan, thereby giving the allusion of legitimacy to Zhang Sanjian, as well as causing fights among fans.
Exposé #2: Xiao Chen
QuelleVous’s posts: [here] Bluebird’s followup: [here]
Works as a ticketing agent China Southern Air, she’s been in the fandom for a long time.
All of the "leaked itineraries” supposedly of Zhang Zhehan that are related to the girlfriend rumors came from China Southern Air.
These itineraries are not him: you can buy flights for anyone as long as you have their ID number, as we know Xie Yihua’s side do.
She also previously invested in bitcoin.
A lot of the Zhang Sanjian itineraries that have been “leaked” are from China Southern Air.
Why would anyone continue to fly the same airline that keeps leaking their personal information?
Exposé #3: Tang Xiaoya
QuelleVous’s posts: [here] Bluebird’s followup: [here]
He played the anti, being among the first people to say that Li Xuezheng was investigating for attention.
Peng Lihu gained people’s trust by “taking him down”
He works for the same people as Peng Lihu.
He’s a failed writer who currently works as an executive producer for a TV production company that both iQiyi (invested in by Songcheng) and Huayi (connections to CAPA) have shares in.
He posted far too much content to have actually been working at the time he was making these posts—being an anti was what he was doing for work. This is a common pattern.
Exposé #4: Mark
Flora’s post: [here]
One of the gym bros who’s been appearing in footage with Zhang Sanjian, first appeared in the football photos. (He’s the shortest guy.)
Came to the forefront when they started posting footage of Zhang Sanjian in the gym and pilates studio—he owns those.
Also an ambassador for Lulu Lemon.
He’s been very pleased with the social media engagement he’s been getting through all this, specifically to his Douyin account. He restarted his Instagram and opened a Xiao Hong Shu.
Not all the footage he posts has Zhang Sanjian, and some of it only has Zhang Sanjian blurry in the background.
He’s the one who got the boxing coach, Jason Cortis, for Zhang Sanjian.
This sort of activity gets these people engagement and publicity while cheapening Zhang Zhehan’s image. They’re making him into a side character and associating him with third-rate people.
Mark has never said Zhang Zhehan’s name (only “Xiao Zhe”) but he’s liked and replied to comments with the full name.
He’s made comments about being a very close friend of Zhang Zhehan’s, them hanging out in his car together for example.
Some of these people are obviously more cautious while other’s have let it go to their heads.
Exposé #5: Ms. Chen
QuelleVous’s posts: [here] [here] Flora’s followup: [here]
A law clerk for the environmental resources court of China, a public servant.
She’s used her job to threaten people with legal action online (for example people who said they were going to return the brand’s merch) using her profession as a threat. 
This is illegal in many countries, it’s a misuse of public trust.
She also implied that she’s a bigger deal professionally than she actually is.
The environmental resources court is one of the less busy courts, giving her a fair amount of downtime to be active online. 
QuelleVous found what seems to be her master’s thesis, but it wasn’t published until last year which doesn’t match up.
She was part of the clarification gang.
An aside: The clarification gang submitted a huge document to all of CAPA’s departments pre-Li Xuezheng which includes things that harms Zhang Zhehan more than helps him. QuelleVous has a copy of this.
She’s now pretending she’s in Hong Kong.
She also piled on attacks and threatened a cease and desist against a 3D artist who refused to help Xie Yihua’s side, saying that the 3D artist’s work was illegal.
She went full anti against Gong Jun after the Instagram video.
Exposé #6: Sanke
QuelleVous’s posts: [here] Flora’s followup: [here] Bluebirds followups: [here] [here]
A “righteous passerby” who made a lot of videos about Zhang Zhehan when Li Xuezheng was around.
All of her Sanke persona accounts follow one small account, which was found to be her personal account. These accounts interacted with each other as if they were different people.
She’s a lecturer / saleswoman at a test prep centre for public servants (not a public servant herself). Her specialty is writing summarizing essays.
Some people she knows irl really don’t like her and sent QuelleVous proof that she is Sanke lol.
She’s attacked Gong Jun constantly in recent months.
She and Lao Ahyi have kissed each other’s asses a lot. Lao Ahyi deleted some of these posts after QuelleVous’s expose of Sanke.
She’s very hypocritical, saying she doesn’t want to get involved in fandom drama yet doing just that.
She did a “How to become a KOL” workshop.
MCN > Multi-Network Channel, enterprise business partner companies who sign up smaller channels in exchange for a cut of their profits. (ex. YouTube) The term in China is like an influencer management agency. They’re often very exploitative and take advantage of content creators.
Exposé #7: Ms. Jiang
QuelleVous’s posts: [here] Flora’s followup: [here] Followup about another from her group: [here] Bluebird’s followup: [here]
Presents herself as a psychic. 
She writes content for other psychics including others within the fandom, working for a company with ties to CAPA.
She has ties to Songcheng and Umbrella.
She’s a narrative plant who has said things to give credibility to various people and accounts. For example, saying that an account was secretly Li Xuezheng.
She was in the original clarifications gang.
She’s implied that she knows Zhang Zhehan personally.
She has not reacted to QuelleVous’s exposé and has continued business as usual.
Other psychics in her network have made claims about Gong Jun and Zhang Zhehan’s relationship, slander against Gong Jun individually, and claims slandering Zhang Mama, etc. They feed different narratives to different groups.
Exposé #8: Ms. X
QuelleVous’s posts: [here] [here] Bluebird’s followup: [here] Flora’s followup: [here]
A counsellor who works with Zhang Peichao, the psychologist who supposedly “helped Zhang Sanjian and Zhang Mama.”
Defended and has a sort of hero worship for Zhang Peichao but claimed to not know him personally.
Had some financial troubles last year.
Has claimed she can psychoanalyze Gong Jun and claims that he hates Zhang Zhehan. She’s made some really disgusting comments against him.
She does not have a psychology degree.
Exposé #7: Mr. Xu
QuelleVous’s posts: [here] Bluebird’s followup: [here] Flora’s followup: [here]
A “fan” who pretends to be a middle aged woman with a daughter. He’s actually a middle aged man with a son.
He has made a lot of posts thirsting over Zhang Zhehan in very offputting ways.
A lot of solos really dislike him.
He has had a lot of failed professions.
He knows Umbrella.
His behaviour in response to QuelleVous’s expose is very similar to Sophie’s, and it’s likely that they know each other.
Concluding Candy
Ever since last year when people started paying attention to Gong Jun’s Douyin likes, he’s very careful about them. Yesterday Gong Jun liked a douyin of a woman who runs a foodstall whose hours are 5 to 11.
The caption included “Be happy being yourself.” 
This is similar to the caption on the frog photo last week.
It’s also similar to what Gong Jun and Zhang Zhehan’s message to fans has always been: prioritize your own life and your family, not them
[Masterlist of my notes from previous spaces]
39 notes · View notes
bluebirdmuppet · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Reposted from Instagram. Trying to figure out what works on Tumblr. 😅
The entire Zhang Sanjian in Xinyu bar “meet up” is fake.
This set of posts relate to his fake travel schedule put out by Zhang Sanjian fans.
26 notes · View notes
bluebirdmuppet · 2 years
Text
Silver Knight 隐光战士 - The 32 Frames Problem related to AI Analysis of May 3, 2022 super3 Instagram Video - from Weibo Post dated June 25, 2022
Translator’s notes:
This post was written in response to a question from another person who ran the video through a model and got low scores (suggesting that the video is real).  This is Silver Knight’s response on June 25, 2022. Weibo link: https://m.weibo.cn/status/4784252216149062
Because of the style in which this was written, I have added some context.  Silver Knight has reviewed this post and confirms the accuracy of the contents. 
_____________________________________________________________
I’m crying. Finally…finally…finally there is a serious question. It is not a soul-torturing question about why they bought the brand, why they couldn’t access the website link, why I don’t know how to do computer modelling….
The question is: someone ran the video through a model according to the tutorial I posted. Why are the results inconsistent? Why is the average different each time?
First, it may be that the model is not the same. Some models return a high false positive rate and some return a low false positive rate, it is recommended that you run each model and then choose. The two [three] criteria I use are as follows: After running a video I recorded myself, it must be flat. After running other people’s Instagram videos, the reading can fluctuate. After running fake videos (other known deepfakes), the reading is high.
Second: There is a sampling problem. For example, take a video which has approximately two hundred frames, and then from those 200 frames, 32 frames are selected. This sampling size ratio is not a problem, because it is almost 15% of the total number of frames. However, the Instagram video has 10,000 frames, if you only select 32 that is worthless. If for simplicity, you only use a portion of the video, then depending on where you have cut the video, you will get different results. The green circle in Figure 2 can give you readings of approximately less than 0.05, but the red circle in Figure 1 can give you readings of over 0.9. So if this Instagram video is not taken apart and is casually run on a random online program, it can give you a wrong reading. That is why at first, I wrote a script to take 1000 frames, and then I later found that I could modify the parameters of this script to run the analysis on the entire video [all frames].
Figure 1
Tumblr media
Figure 2
Tumblr media
Third: Average. In order to have a standard, usually classification algorithms will collapse the data. The concept of “average” is a good standard, however it is limited by the distribution of data. Let’s use an analogy, if an apartment only houses people from one social class, using average salary to calculate the average is an appropriate practice. However, if you add an Elon Musk to a group of blue-collared workers, can we say that this is a group of multimillionaires? That is why looking at the distribution is more convincing than using the mean.
29 notes · View notes
bluebirdmuppet · 2 years
Text
Silver Knight 隐光战士 - Comments to Weibo Post dated July 3, 2022
I translated several comments to Silver Knight's July 3, 2022 Weibo Post because they are help explain the crux of the AI analysis.
Comment 1:
Tumblr media
By Silver Knight 隐光战士:
Now you understand. Determining whether something is a deepfake is difficult, particularly if the camera has a filter or if it is processed by a social media platform. If Super3 had even one graph that had a high level of green, I would not make the conclusion that it is fake.
Comment 2:
Tumblr media
By LT的探戈:
I understand it this way, can you tell me if it is right: Use one model to run all the frames of two videos, the real videos and fake videos will have results that are far apart, so the thing that is opposite of the real video is fake.
Reply by Silver Knight 隐光战士:
The important part is, using each model, Super3 is fake. If you take a real video, you can see that some models are sensitive to the filters on Instagram. However, using the video on Super3, each model says it is fake, and the ratings are between 0.8 to 1.0
Comment 3:
Tumblr media
By 浪钉春日出逃:
It is as if I finally understand it a little… you ran all the frames of the super3 video on 10 models, the model data from each was very high. But when you use other people’s Instagram videos, only one model yielded a similar result, the other models are virtually flat. Plus the other side only ran 32 frames, so it is like having over 10,000 frames in a video but only a very small part was sampled, so the average values are lower, is this right?
Reply by Silver Knight 隐光战士:
I want to cry… I finally wrote something that someone understands.
21 notes · View notes
bizarrequazar · 2 years
Text
09-04 (CST) CPF Plants Space Notes
This was a space held by Bluebird, QuelleVous, and Flora discussing tactics and behavioural trends seen from fans planted within the Chinese fandom, with a focus on planted CPFs. [Recording]
[Character map by Flora made for this space]
General discussion
There’s a rumor that something will happen in September relating to one of Sophie’s personas. QuelleVous advises that Sophie does not do this if she values her and her boyfriend’s privacy.
Planted fans pretty much all have the same narrative that they try to sell, just tailored to fit their persona (ie. whether they’re a solo, CPF, righteous passerby, etc.)
The solo side has recently been trying to undo Zhang Zhehan’s major achievements, for example his bike trip to Tibet that the Instagram now copied but had him fail to complete. They’re trying to break apart what people respect him for, leading people to doubt if he is who they believe he is.
CPF plants paint Zhang Zhehan as relying on Gong Jun to do everything for him, such as one poisonous fake candy about Gong Jun going through legal negotiations for him.
People tried to convince QuelleVous that they were in a 200 person group with Zhang Zhehan’s lawyer. This would absolutely never happen; these sorts of things seem to be relying on the people they’re saying it to having little to no knowledge of how legal situations are handled.
A lot of the discussions happen in private group chats rather than in public, making it easier to manipulate the narrative and brainwash fans into believing slander. (The illusion of intimacy.) QuelleVous encourages people to make these things public since it allows falsities to be pointed out and rectified.
Be aware of what degree of a parasocial relationship you’ve developed, and be critical about the information about Zhang Zhehan you get: Does it sound too intimate to be something that would be shared with others? Is it consistent with his real persona or only what has been told to you? It is designed to be what you want to hear?
Statistically, it would make sense for there to be more CPF plants than solo plants since there are more CPFs in general, yet they seem to have had less infuence as CPFs tend to be more wary. CPFs, even popular ones, are more likely to get called out for behaviour that could potentially reflect badly on Zhang Zhehan and Gong Jun. Planted CPFs therefore have to be more careful and more often act in small private groups. 
The planted CPF narrative:  -  Zhang Mama is controlling   -  Zhang Zhehan is impassive and can’t take care of himself  -  Li Xuezheng is trying to stir political trouble  -  Gong Jun is controlling  -  The teashop is Zhang Zhehan’s family’s  -  The legal case isn’t going anywhere
A lot of infighting has been happening among solos, resulting in private chat logs being exposed:  -  A common thread is the belief that Zhang Zhehan’s team was asking for help from fans, so fans were trying to get as close to him as they could.   -  People like Sophie claimed they had contact (including voice calls) with Zhang Mama, his lawyers, the tea shop, etc. This is where Chen Ayhi comes in.   -  A lot of “I have a friend who talked to someone who knows someone” type sources.
Zhang Zhehan himself never did anything to promote the tea shop, it seems like he actually tried to avoid drawing attention to it to avoid fans flocking to it.
At this point, the fact that people still believe in the scam seems to be largely based on pride—people don’t want to admit they were wrong, especially when they’ve caused harm. 
Some people who don’t believe are manipulated to act as if they do, “If you don’t believe it you don’t love him.” Some have realized that the Sophie, brand, etc. is a scam but still believe that Zhang Sanjian is Zhang Zhehan, and that either that really is his character or he’s been duped/manipulated.
Bai Ying
QuelleVous went through Bai Ying’s posts with her PI to look for common themes/topics. Through this she noticed that his MAC address (ie. device, not just IP) matches another account that has now been identified as him.
In his posts on this other account, he gives intimate knowledge of the location and menu of the cafeteria for the newspaper he works for, which his persona on this other account had no reason to know.
He is currently muted.
When you go through his account, it’s very clear what CAPA’s aims are, ie. promoting Zhang Sanjian and the tea shop, attacking the courts, claiming that Zhang Zhehan’s case is going poorly, that Zhang Zhehan is incompetent, etc.
“Uncle”
Exposed by QuelleVous earlier today: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]  tl;dr: He posted an essay in July 2021 claiming to be Zhang Zhehan’s uncle and a police officer. This essay was spread by fans since it seemed to be defending him, but it resulted in a number of very negative false rumors.
The essay was VERY long, most people only ever read parts rather than the full thing. 
Parts of it apparently read like a bad fanfic, there’s a section talking about Zhang Zhehan’s abs???
The essay was written 21-07-15 and posted 07-17, yet no attention was drawn to it until 07-21, the same day as the fake girlfriend "debunks”.
“Uncle” works in the PR department for the Public Security Bereau, he’s not a police officer.
The essay said that Zhang Zhehan had come to him for advice while he was working on Formed Police Unit, implying that Zhang Zhehan unprofessional and unable to keep his work confidential.
“Uncle” is from the same city as Zhang Zhehan, but there’s no indication that they know each other, nor is there any familial connection.
The essay included a long paragraph promoting the tea shop.
None of the rumors this essay led to were addressed by Sophie’s first wave of clarifications despite the fact that they should have been very easy to debunk. 
An aside: Sophie’s clarifications rarely covered the most serious rumors. 
The essay on the surface level comes across like it’s painting Zhang Zhehan in a positive light, but slips in various negative things.
His wife’s account liked posts from Tantan and Su Shifu as early as March, showing that they were identifying people who could potentially be used to spread their narrative. (They failed with Tantan, no blame or suspicion is being placed on him.)
Wendy
The CPF version of Sophie. 
She has tons of accounts, but has gone inactive since QuelleVous exposed her.
She has insisted that she knows QuelleVous. She does not, though QuelleVous says it’s possible they were in a group chat together at some point.
One of the first CPFs who pulled CPFs into group chats after 813 to “collect evidence for the tea shop,” saying she had a contact close to Zhang Zhehan, and encouraging people to spread Su Shifu’s podcast and speak out rather than staying in their coffins. “Right now, only talking about him and keeping him in the press can save him.” 
Wendy used to send people in her group chats articles written by HBW saying “Ignore that it’s written by him, look at it objectively.”
She has claimed that Zhang Zhehan and Zhang Mama fight a lot.
A lot of the “candy” she’s spread paints Zhang Zhehan and Gong Jun negatively. Shipping should not come with character assassination.
After QuelleVous began to expose her, Wendy went crying to her chat groups dramatically playing the victim and saying they were betraying her by believing QuelleVous.
Serafina
Has about five different accounts on Twitter, they each follow at least one of the others. One was mushroom_51129, other accounts can be identified by them @’ing her and replying in long-winded bad English.
She and Wendy orchestrated the attacks on Li Xuezheng, Bril, and Neil Gaiman and tried to bait the latter two into speaking badly about the Chinese government.
She’s a part of a group on Weibo promoting a Gong Jun/Zhang Sanjian ship.
Concluding candy(?)
Someone in Los Angeles is using Gong Jun’s thirst trap photos on Grindr, QuelleVous’s coworker showed it to her.
A lot of people have been questioning if there’s significance to the part of Gong Jun’s recent vlog where walks down a country road, since he said it was very scenic and it isn’t really. A man in white can be vaguely seen at the end of the road as the shot pulls out. A photo of this was used for Gong Jun’s September schedule.
Chen Ahyi just deactivated her Weibo account because she couldn’t figure out how to delete her pfp history lol
[Masterlist of my previous space notes]
31 notes · View notes