minors dni antis/terfs/maps and their defenders BEGONE
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
of course she supports "map rights, if you have map dni you're a republican" aggie, no surprises.
I've read around that her actual father is dead, no sources but it would make her act even more concerning.
It gotta be a roleplay simply because all the story around her supposed dad is completely fake, there's no traces on the internet of her artist dad's past artwork. What's really weird is how she insists on not breaking this strange roleplay even if she left herself proof that's clearly a roleplay on her own ao3 fanfiction.
receipts of MAPs, "profiction paraphiles" and the proshippers who defend them
The proship discourse space has been muddied by "pro paraphiles" who pretend to encourage "recovery" to strangers and are frequently enabled by proshippers. This posts aim to collect all evidence of said people who actually are:
-Following minors -Following child models -Justifying drawn NSFW using children photos -Allowing PRO CONTACT zoophiles and MAPs to follow them if not outright encourage them -Encouraging zoo and pedophiliac attractions -Considering paraphiliacs, including zoophiles and MAPs, to be inherently queer for their attraction -Generally purposefully allowing zoophiles and MAPs in "proship" spaces and wanting others to accept them
This is no longer about fiction nor protecting children and csa survivors.
Evidence will be provided below.
Receipts of user ZeebDemon and the proshippers who defend her.
Following PRO CONTACT Zoos and MAPs:
Following an "animals can consent" podcast
Following many pro-contact pedophiles and zoophiles, as seen here
Costantly hiding and downplaying her paraphilia, hiding behind TOS (the same TOS that no longer claims transphobia as hate speech as of now) and defending NSFW art meant to be pornographic based on real children (discussion here)
Following SEVERAL child models and liking their posts:
Encouraging every paraphiliac attraction and putting it on the same level as being queer:
When a user expressed their grievances, they responded by claiming that wanting to keep dangerous urges at bay is "puritanical dogma".
Link
link
Following an adult who follows minors NSFW and instead of reporting she just hopes to be "a positive influence and rolemodel".
adybpt, a 11k followers proship discourser actively defended Zeebdemon and believed her on her word that "she wants to be a positive influence for their followers", all evidence above ignored.
Several proship/left leaning users blindly agreed with adybpt and derailed the conversation by arguing about other issues with altright users. As legitimate these other concerns were, the original discussion of MAPs infiltrating proship spaces and profiction discourse has been derailed.
Now proships encourage acting as licensed therapists to strangers online
28/11/2022 edit: adybpt has unfollowed zeebdemon after peerpressure from other users showing further proof. This changes nothing. In fact, that him and other proshippers were ok with a ZOOMAP following procontacts en masse trying to "change their minds" like some paraphile Jesus Christ is damning in itself. Would you follow dozens of violent hate accounts trying to change their minds, while also following hate speech rethoric accounts and actively excusing their hate symbols?
adybpt also conveniently took zeebdemon's words in good faith while slamming other users and derailing the conversation, ignoring other replies showing proof
Other proshippers immediately came to adybpt's defense, saying he couldn't know about proof, that's not his job to vet his followers and see all their tweets, yet they couldn't spend a word on Zeebdemon and other ZOOMAPs welcoming procontacts. Regardless if the attack was in bad faith, the fact remains that adybpt endorsed a zoomap to 11k followers and did not delete until called out for 2 days.
What are these popular proshippers focusing on? Bridget's gender discourse. Not deplatforming zoomaps. Slamming random antis and right wing dudebros. Identity politics. Calling out pedophiles and zoophiles following children and pro-contacts? Too much work.
These proshippers have thousands of followers. They should do better than platform pedophiles and zoophiles. This has nothing to do with fiction anymore.
---
stwawbwewypwess had a whole fallout encouraging "map rights" and "abolish the sex offender registry". She was also followed by minors and zoophiles.
PolitePuppet/340678002x9, a popular artist and proshipper actively supporting her after the fallout
Claiming that "paraphilia discourse" was vital to proship ideology. No, it never was. Proship ideology was born on the petty ship wars on tumblr around 2015. Paraphiliac discussion was only shoehorned in by those directly affected, hoping to find a space among proshippers.
PolitePuppet also follows Zeebdemon on their side account, handsomehugs
Many proshippers also gave stwawbwewypwess the benefit of the doubt, despite all the red flags.
stwawbwewypwess has been suspended, but her ideas are still lingering in proship spaces.
I only wanted to collect proof to showcase the problem because it gets brushed off too often. Do not harass in any way these users.
edit 2: adybpt derailed the conversation again, ignored a pro-para user's followings and their pro-c followers and of course ignored this post.
56 notes
·
View notes
Note
Who did Glip and Eevee befriend in the art and tech spheres to be so untouchable ??? No doubt those in the industry that protect them sympathize with predators at best
Art spheres no. Glip used to be this way but fell out of grace with the big fluff logs dropped.
Tech and indie game communities however, are still partial to protecting Eevee because she plays up the 'It's all kiwifarms & transphobia' angle really well and wasn't ever actually married to Marl - loosening the impact of the BF logs on her reputation compared to Glip.
I'll use cohost as an example, because it's pretty blatant there.
Just look at the comments on this post on her cohost, and how she talks about her detractors.
....The post she's talking about, by the way, is only about Lain and Big Fluff. The 2 children Marl sexually abused. It's true that both kids posted on kiwifarms, but it's extremely manipulatively dishonest to refer to them both as just KF users.
Cohost btw, seems to be in her pocket. The one time I'm aware that someone called Eevee out on something, they got banned from the platform entirely nearly instantly.
The original comment was on this post of Eevee's. Eevee edited it out, but the same comment was shared on lolcow and had a link in it. Here is the tweet the banned commenter linked to, and relevant screenshots. Guess she didn't want people seeing this. I wonder why?
It was this comment to Eevee that pushed Glip to double down on wishing Jollys suicide attempt was successful, looking at the timing of everything.
Twitter sucks, but if Cohost is willing to look the other way at abhorrent behavior like wishing that someone who attempted suicide twice was successful....so long as the person doing that said abhorrent behavior is Eevee...but quick to drop the hammer on those that lightly point out that said behavior is beyond fucked up - then cohost is rotten at the top and isn't worth using.
152 notes
·
View notes
Text
Deadspacedog is roleplaying, if you read her "article" (really just a fanfiction) on AO3 it becomes obvious it's all made up, there's no sources to her dad's story online. The people who appear to support it as if it were real should be called out, ang included.
receipts of MAPs, "profiction paraphiles" and the proshippers who defend them
The proship discourse space has been muddied by "pro paraphiles" who pretend to encourage "recovery" to strangers and are frequently enabled by proshippers. This posts aim to collect all evidence of said people who actually are:
-Following minors -Following child models -Justifying drawn NSFW using children photos -Allowing PRO CONTACT zoophiles and MAPs to follow them if not outright encourage them -Encouraging zoo and pedophiliac attractions -Considering paraphiliacs, including zoophiles and MAPs, to be inherently queer for their attraction -Generally purposefully allowing zoophiles and MAPs in "proship" spaces and wanting others to accept them
This is no longer about fiction nor protecting children and csa survivors.
Evidence will be provided below.
Receipts of user ZeebDemon and the proshippers who defend her.
Following PRO CONTACT Zoos and MAPs:
Following an "animals can consent" podcast
Following many pro-contact pedophiles and zoophiles, as seen here
Costantly hiding and downplaying her paraphilia, hiding behind TOS (the same TOS that no longer claims transphobia as hate speech as of now) and defending NSFW art meant to be pornographic based on real children (discussion here)
Following SEVERAL child models and liking their posts:
Encouraging every paraphiliac attraction and putting it on the same level as being queer:
When a user expressed their grievances, they responded by claiming that wanting to keep dangerous urges at bay is "puritanical dogma".
Link
link
Following an adult who follows minors NSFW and instead of reporting she just hopes to be "a positive influence and rolemodel".
adybpt, a 11k followers proship discourser actively defended Zeebdemon and believed her on her word that "she wants to be a positive influence for their followers", all evidence above ignored.
Several proship/left leaning users blindly agreed with adybpt and derailed the conversation by arguing about other issues with altright users. As legitimate these other concerns were, the original discussion of MAPs infiltrating proship spaces and profiction discourse has been derailed.
Now proships encourage acting as licensed therapists to strangers online
28/11/2022 edit: adybpt has unfollowed zeebdemon after peerpressure from other users showing further proof. This changes nothing. In fact, that him and other proshippers were ok with a ZOOMAP following procontacts en masse trying to "change their minds" like some paraphile Jesus Christ is damning in itself. Would you follow dozens of violent hate accounts trying to change their minds, while also following hate speech rethoric accounts and actively excusing their hate symbols?
adybpt also conveniently took zeebdemon's words in good faith while slamming other users and derailing the conversation, ignoring other replies showing proof
Other proshippers immediately came to adybpt's defense, saying he couldn't know about proof, that's not his job to vet his followers and see all their tweets, yet they couldn't spend a word on Zeebdemon and other ZOOMAPs welcoming procontacts. Regardless if the attack was in bad faith, the fact remains that adybpt endorsed a zoomap to 11k followers and did not delete until called out for 2 days.
What are these popular proshippers focusing on? Bridget's gender discourse. Not deplatforming zoomaps. Slamming random antis and right wing dudebros. Identity politics. Calling out pedophiles and zoophiles following children and pro-contacts? Too much work.
These proshippers have thousands of followers. They should do better than platform pedophiles and zoophiles. This has nothing to do with fiction anymore.
---
stwawbwewypwess had a whole fallout encouraging "map rights" and "abolish the sex offender registry". She was also followed by minors and zoophiles.
PolitePuppet/340678002x9, a popular artist and proshipper actively supporting her after the fallout
Claiming that "paraphilia discourse" was vital to proship ideology. No, it never was. Proship ideology was born on the petty ship wars on tumblr around 2015. Paraphiliac discussion was only shoehorned in by those directly affected, hoping to find a space among proshippers.
PolitePuppet also follows Zeebdemon on their side account, handsomehugs
Many proshippers also gave stwawbwewypwess the benefit of the doubt, despite all the red flags.
stwawbwewypwess has been suspended, but her ideas are still lingering in proship spaces.
I only wanted to collect proof to showcase the problem because it gets brushed off too often. Do not harass in any way these users.
edit 2: adybpt derailed the conversation again, ignored a pro-para user's followings and their pro-c followers and of course ignored this post.
56 notes
·
View notes
Text
not only are the people behind ao3 racist zionists, they allow rape fanfiction of real minors until legal action is taken into account. they say it's legal, until somebody threatens to sue to take it down.
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
r/ao3 is a zionist, racist, pro child RPF shithole
I'm sure you've all heard of ao3 being run by zionists. Reddit is fully on Ao3's side and shitting on Orchestratif for bringing this to light, calling him a "westerner" (he's indo-chinese) and an "extremist".
The "extremist" take in question is being against drawn NSFW based on the likeness of a real child. Which is illegal and unethical.
We got a professional war crime in the name of fanfiction apologist and she's a TERF
Tons of liberal centrism, both sides, whatabaoutism, over fucking genocide. The only people offended by Palestine's liberation in "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free" are GENOCIDAL ZIONISTS.
Supporting genocide is just twitter drama I guess
Whole zionist wall of texts full of Israel proapganda. The first line is more than enough for you to read.
And of course, we have disingenuous zionists comparing themselves to oppressed minorities
Well if you replace "fascists" with "(minority of your choice)" it changes meaning doesn't it
16 notes
·
View notes
Text
Thank you very much for your contribution. I had no idea. This subset of "proshippers" who defend RPF of children has been known, but many have come out more openly now because the art is "anime".
The others were self described proshippers. I will edit the post to add this information
Proshippers who support NSFW art of child actors
Do not spread or justify artwork exploiting the likeness of real children, as it counts as csem in most legislation such as most of Europe and the USA. It doesn't matter if the child in question is an adult now. It's still CHILD EXPLOITATION, just like AI and Deepfakes made on the likeness of existing children
according to these people it's fine to draw child actors in nsfw because they won't sue (it's not fine and it's not legal, not even by twitter TOS)
comparing exploiting child's actor likeness for nsfw to... abortion being banned?
insinuating that "anime" style nsfw of real children is perfectly fine and ok if it's... meme-able?
this is zrcalo/struggs, a well known pedophile and zoophile, denying the artist in question had an obsession with the child actor. which they absolutely did, since they posted and used behind the scenes photos as reference for their art, multiple times, and self-admitted their obsession on twitter
a libertarian arguing it's ok to make NSFW art of real children if they're an adult now and "giving permission" to use their likeness
"just scroll over nsfw art of child actors, no biggie"
82 notes
·
View notes
Text
Proshippers who support NSFW art of child actors
Do not spread or justify artwork exploiting the likeness of real children, as it counts as csem in most legislation such as most of Europe and the USA. It doesn't matter if the child in question is an adult now. It's still CHILD EXPLOITATION, just like AI and Deepfakes made on the likeness of existing children
according to these people it's fine to draw child actors in nsfw because they won't sue (it's not fine and it's not legal, not even by twitter TOS)
comparing exploiting child's actor likeness for nsfw to... abortion being banned?
insinuating that "anime" style nsfw of real children is perfectly fine and ok if it's... meme-able?
edit: addition from a reblog
this is zrcalo/struggs, a well known pedophile and zoophile, denying the artist in question had an obsession with the child actor. which they absolutely did, since they posted and used behind the scenes photos as reference for their art, multiple times, and self-admitted their obsession on twitter
a libertarian arguing it's ok to make NSFW art of real children if they're an adult now and "giving permission" to use their likeness
"just scroll over nsfw art of child actors, no biggie"
82 notes
·
View notes
Text
smartest american when presented with the option of revolution
1 note
·
View note
Text
please tell me why should I care about you when you openly admitted you only care about your country's own problems and not the rest of the world.
I, personally, prioritize my country's domestic issues such as puritanicalism, homophobia, transphobia, corruption, etc. as they affect me more directly.
follow your therapist's advice and log off.
You Are Not Obligated
Nobody is obligated to speak about Palestine. Nobody is obligated to speak about Ukraine. Nobody is obligated to talk about ANY political issue. If you don't want to talk about any of these issues because it is too distressing for you, you are valid. You are NOT complicit, you do NOT have blood on your hands. Do not let those toxic assholes on Twitter or other sites tell you otherwise. They're abusive, and they want to control you. Your mental health comes first. Is this about ignoring these issues? No. This is about the fact that nobody gets to decide what YOU post.
This is not even mentioning that, realistically, those politicians up at the top don't give a shit about us whether or not we agree with them. We are merely a bunch of little pawns to be be used by them. They don't give a shit, and they will ignore us. Either that, or they will abandon us once they decide that our usefulness has ended. This is not a nihilistic view. This is a realistic view.
168 notes
·
View notes
Text
I'm not an anti lmaooooo it's a meme based upon the fact that asking certain things to be "tw tagged" is not very reasonable! especially "please tag genocide because it's making me uncomfy and i don't wanna see it because it doesn't concern me and i want to jack off to anime I am the totally normal one here"
log off. or maybe next time stay silent instead of making a stink about how you're so brave for not talking about things, nobody would have cared if you hadn't tagged it everywhere to call for attention. here's the attention you ordered!
"politically obsessed asshole" ahahahahahah so it's politics if it's brown kids dying but it's personal and close when it's americans getting shot
You Are Not Obligated
Nobody is obligated to speak about Palestine. Nobody is obligated to speak about Ukraine. Nobody is obligated to talk about ANY political issue. If you don't want to talk about any of these issues because it is too distressing for you, you are valid. You are NOT complicit, you do NOT have blood on your hands. Do not let those toxic assholes on Twitter or other sites tell you otherwise. They're abusive, and they want to control you. Your mental health comes first. Is this about ignoring these issues? No. This is about the fact that nobody gets to decide what YOU post.
This is not even mentioning that, realistically, those politicians up at the top don't give a shit about us whether or not we agree with them. We are merely a bunch of little pawns to be be used by them. They don't give a shit, and they will ignore us. Either that, or they will abandon us once they decide that our usefulness has ended. This is not a nihilistic view. This is a realistic view.
168 notes
·
View notes
Text
it's a meme based on this
You Are Not Obligated
Nobody is obligated to speak about Palestine. Nobody is obligated to speak about Ukraine. Nobody is obligated to talk about ANY political issue. If you don't want to talk about any of these issues because it is too distressing for you, you are valid. You are NOT complicit, you do NOT have blood on your hands. Do not let those toxic assholes on Twitter or other sites tell you otherwise. They're abusive, and they want to control you. Your mental health comes first. Is this about ignoring these issues? No. This is about the fact that nobody gets to decide what YOU post.
This is not even mentioning that, realistically, those politicians up at the top don't give a shit about us whether or not we agree with them. We are merely a bunch of little pawns to be be used by them. They don't give a shit, and they will ignore us. Either that, or they will abandon us once they decide that our usefulness has ended. This is not a nihilistic view. This is a realistic view.
168 notes
·
View notes
Text
Good observation, there's no date on the post, however I've read it's been deleted. Doesn't seem to be faked. The reposted screenshot is also recent, from 21 october, if it's straight from the source. Timing is very suspicious.
Regarding Tara Strong: she's been fired and there's been a lot of noise thankfully. Same for other celebrities. This post is specifically about Bryan Fuller because of the Proship mug and stuff that rose him to proship fame.
The sexual harassment allegations can be easily googled, so there's that as proof.
Either way, there's been 0 discussion about him, which is why I was asking.
Why are proshippers silent on Brayn Fuller being a zionist?
On top of accusation of sexual harassment.
22 notes
·
View notes
Text
Mh. I dunno who any of you people are, but Bryan Fuller was really popular on twitter for endorsing a proship small shop and buying a mug. We're talking about thousands of likes here from big proship account. No words from them after this happened.
Congrats for being healthy about the guy, I've never watched Hannibal. But you're definitely not influential big accounts I can even be mad at...
Why are proshippers silent on Brayn Fuller being a zionist?
On top of accusation of sexual harassment.
22 notes
·
View notes
Text
Why are proshippers silent on Brayn Fuller being a zionist?
On top of accusation of sexual harassment.
22 notes
·
View notes
Text
gonna make a collection of selfish people too anxious about genocide happening to care
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
I don't see any missiles, bombs, white phosphorus, and military action on the USA.
What the hell is wrong with you to even compare what you usamericans go through to PALESTINE'S GENOCIDE? You're terminally online. You are selfish, entitled and blind beyond belief
You Are Not Obligated
Nobody is obligated to speak about Palestine. Nobody is obligated to speak about Ukraine. Nobody is obligated to talk about ANY political issue. If you don't want to talk about any of these issues because it is too distressing for you, you are valid. You are NOT complicit, you do NOT have blood on your hands. Do not let those toxic assholes on Twitter or other sites tell you otherwise. They're abusive, and they want to control you. Your mental health comes first. Is this about ignoring these issues? No. This is about the fact that nobody gets to decide what YOU post.
This is not even mentioning that, realistically, those politicians up at the top don't give a shit about us whether or not we agree with them. We are merely a bunch of little pawns to be be used by them. They don't give a shit, and they will ignore us. Either that, or they will abandon us once they decide that our usefulness has ended. This is not a nihilistic view. This is a realistic view.
168 notes
·
View notes