whymasi - Tumblr blog

[whymasi]

put some respect on mother’s words

[whymasi]

When we see the cars sparkling hitting the ground isn't that going up through your spine and through your teeth. Can you feel it so much inside?

[whymasi]

oscar piastri vs an automatic door

[whymasi]

friendly reminder to everyone that F1 IS NOT A REALITY TV PROGRAM. this is a real person's life we are talking about and making jokes/memes about it is incredibly vile on your part. PLEASE stop being parasocial and understand that what's happening is much bigger than racing/feuds/competition/drama and if you can't understand it PLEASE for the love of God SHUT UP

[whymasi]

Begging you guys to not share any messages even if they are revealed to be authentic, especially if they have identifying information. Not to protect Horner but because we don't know if this was done with the victim's consent.

[whymasi]

Lately I've been seeing a lot of people asking FOR *LEGAL* ways to watch F1 so here is a list of websites I use or know of.

P.S. USE A VPN OR A BROWSER LIKE BRAVE TO WATCH THE STREAMINGS

Overtakefans

Daddylivehd (the one I use)

Time4tv

VIPRow Sports

FSL (I like this one as well)

Hesgoaltv

Update:

Lord Latifi thanks to @inestahr

Live1

I'm sure there are more and if anybody have any website they like to use please feel free to reblog this and add it to the list

[whymasi]

The woman who came forward with the allegations against Christian Horner was doxxed, and every women that works in RedBull is apparently recieving the same treatment. Not only that but a harassment campaign has started against them because the F1 weirdos think that a woman coming forward with claims of sexual abuse will ruin their sport. So let me be the as clear as I'm capable of through a photo screen

IF ANYBODY DARES TO POST ANY PRIVATE INFORMATION REGARDING ANY PERSON INVOLVED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, OR THAT SIMPLY WORKS AT REDBULL, I WILL NOT ONLY BLOCK YOU I WILL REPORT YOU, AND ASK MY MUTUALS TO DO THE SAME.

And I mean everybody involved. Don't harass the woman who came forward or her family and friends, and at the same time don't harass Christian's wife and family. END OF STORY.

AND DON'T TURN THIS INTO A JOKE

This isn't part of silly season 24. This isn't a "the witch is dead" moment. This isn't a "release the crabs" thing either or any other fucked up shit I've seen people say. This woman stood up to her abusive boss and her identity was leaked. This is not a fucking joke

[whymasi]

Whats your opinion on the whole Christian Horner thing?

Let me preface this by saying, I have intentionally stayed away from this subject for many reasons, but given there was an outcome of the investigation today, and some of the information I’ve seen here throughout the past weeks, now is as good a time as any to respond to this ask I got weeks ago. This is not, nor will I be offering in the future, my opinion on whether Horner is guilty of the accusations or not. I just want to maybe provide context, and information from my experience and career thus far, that might help people understand, and also my opinion on the reaction from people. Caveat - I am not a lawyer, nor will I go into specifics of my current or previous job, however I worked in the legal profession where I worked on legal cases, reviewed evidence, and made submissions and recommendations that went in front of Judges.

Okay my thoughts. My thoughts are that an internal investigation that should have remained private for all parties involved, especially the alleged victim(s), was leaked and used as clickbait and gossip by the media and people on here and other social media sites. I think people decided guilt without having any genuine information, without seeing the evidence and without any credible sources. I think were the person being accused a different member of the paddock that the reaction would have been different. I think people used this to virtue signal and cry out about what good people they are. I think people that constantly say that the media and journalists shouldn’t be trusted, fed into a feeding frenzy that led to the name of the alleged victim(s) being published, which will undoubtedly impact them for the rest of their lives.

Onto specific things I have seen that I’d like to offer my take on:

Christian allegedly offering the victim a sum of money - First of all, for anyone who has a certain amount of wealth, especially those in the public eye, this is a usual occurrence. You try to avoid an investigation by any means possible, whether you’re innocent or guilty, because a) it’s easier and usually cheaper in the long run, b) pr and public image are damaged by even unfounded accusations and these things can run on for an extremely long time, and c) trial by media is a thing, and innocent people get tarnished for the rest of their lives because of something they were accused of. Now, I’m not saying any of those are why the offer was allegedly made, but those are some of the reasons. Companies do the same thing, when someone has an accident at work and hurts themselves, even if the company do not believe themselves to be at fault they will make a settlement offer, to avoid any legal back and forth. Settlements are not an admission of guilt, but a way to make something go away quickly.

Said money being why the investigation “went away” - I saw a quote that said “the grievance has been dismissed”, that means there was a finding, not that it was withdrawn. even so, this was a red bull investigation carried out by an external barrister. Once the company were made aware of the allegations, their investigation is independent of either party involved, so even if the alleged victim(s) withdrew their grievance, the company would still have a duty of care to ensure that any inappropriate behaviour or actions were identified, investigated and addressed. Most importantly, red bull want to protect themselves legally, and following the procedures and carrying out a thorough investigation, which would identify if they were potentially exposed to risk, is how they do that.

How can they ignore 100’s of pieces of evidence - We don’t know that they did. It was reported, but never confirmed that there was over 100 pieces of evidence submitted, so this is absolute hearsay. Further, I would be extremely surprised if the investigation ignored any piece of evidence, given the ramifications of an incorrect or improper investigation. Also I think it’s really important to say that evidence does not equal guilt or that one party to the proceedings is correct. Allow me to provide you with a personal example. I worked on a case where there was over 5000 pages of evidence submitted into a legal bundle. Approximately 4000 of those were from the appellant who argued that the other party had acted incorrectly. (forgive my vagueness here I’m not about to doxx myself). 4000 pages of evidence, which I reviewed and made a decision that I did not support their argument. The judge agreed with me also. Evidence can be subjective, and sometimes it can be completely irrelevant. The presence, and submission of evidence is to support one sides view of things, the other side will have their own, and both are examined and balanced and decisions made on that and sometimes also on other independent investigation.

The investigation is private and cannot be shared - This is law. GDPR in fact because this is occurring within Europe. I’m literally spending this entire week on a GDPR course, and have an exam on Friday, so I really don’t want to go on about legal basis and restrictions for sharing personal data, but let me tell you it’s for good reason, especially with investigations like this. All parties involved in this have a legal right to privacy, covered by the human rights act, and unless there is a compelling legal reason why their data should be shared, then it can’t be without their explicit consent. Simple as. And that’s disregarding that there will be confidential company information within the investigation that also cannot be shared.

Horner committed a crime - given that we do not know the specifics of what occurred we simply don’t have enough information to know this, HOWEVER, from the information I have read, and by the fact that I have not seen an indication that the police have been involved with this, nor are they carrying out their own investigation, I am working under the assumption that no law has been broken.

tl;dr - These are real people’s lives, we are not involved and we have no right to know anything. This isn’t salacious gossip, and it’s not a fun thing to band around and use as a stick to beat people with to prove how good we are. Processes and investigations like this should be private, and basing things on hearsay and unscrupulous reporters does more damage to any alleged victims than good. Having seen how fans and social media have treated this investigation, do you think that makes any other alleged victims want to come forwards? I think not. But that’s just me.

[whymasi]

AlpineF1Team Friday morning PG content 😉@.PierreGASLY

[whymasi]

From Normandy to Enstone 

[whymasi]

We race as one (silenced voice)

[whymasi]

pierre worried we might think him and yuki are together and lando thinks they are

[whymasi]

Lando really said: well me and carlos have photos of just the two of us placed in the bedroom and amongst the important trophies, so now you can too, Yuki-san

[whymasi]

Merlin rescues Arthur chiefly out of curiosity. shall go freely A Merlin/Little Mermaid fusion by schweet_heart on ao3 » To Schweet, for winning in the category, Most Fics Finished at the Finish That Fic, Merlin! Event.

[whymasi]

them tags 🤠

[whymasi]

I love it when anons/guests find my works and kudo/leave reviews, but given the new revelation that Elon Musk is using bots to mine AO3 fanfiction for a writing AI without writer's permission, my works are now archive-locked and only available for people with an AO3 account.