aasastrosblog

[aasastrosblog]

MG Saga - Diary - Day 12 - August 20th, 2025 - Is There Life on Mars?

✨ Today’s little experiment: let’s see if the cosmic void stays quiet, if there is life or if the report lottery spins again ✨

When fanpages rewrite reality.

A clear example of what we talked about in Day 10’s diary, aka how fanpages distort content comes from this short interview clip.

Credit IG @Redbullracing

Max texually says:

“Even if you have a bad race or weekend… when you get back home it doesn’t really matter, because you see the little baby smiling at you… and your little girl smiling at you.”

He’s talking about his newborn daughter, with the natural ease of a father coming home after work.

And yet, the very same clip, re-uploaded by a fanpage, suddenly becomes:

“Max talking about P and L 💕”

Here you can clearly see the mechanism:

• from the original (a tender reference to his own baby),

• it turns into a constructed narrative, where Mini P is added as if he had mentioned her.

Please, don’t come and tell me it’s done “to include.” That’s not inclusion, not protection, and not affection: it’s erasure. Because every time this scheme is applied, you’re effectively replacing one father with another, pretending the real one doesn’t exist.

And let’s be clear: the consequences aren’t only on the child.

They also fall on him. Every time the narrative is twisted this way, he gets loaded with an extra parental role that was never his. A role he never chose and never declared. That too is distortion, and it weighs on his real life. As it, logically, also weighs on the real father, who certainly doesn’t experience this manipulation as anything pleasant.

Then there will come a day when Mini P is old enough to look back. And she’ll realize that a group of strangers tried to erase her actual father from her story. Can you imagine the impact? It won’t be a sweet memory, nor an act of kindness: it will be an extra wound, inflicted for free.

This triple effect — on the men, on the child, and on the public narrative — shows just how toxic these whole mechanisms can really be.

Don’t try to pass it off as generosity. There’s nothing generous about it. It’s a distortion of reality disguised as “romanticization,” and the result is devastating: because reality is not a story to be edited online, but the real life of real people. And when you bend it to feed a narrative, the consequences fall on those who actually have to live that life.

So maybe somebody should start moralizing their own behavior, and take a hard look at what they’re doing. Because that is real damage — simply sugarcoated with pink ribbons and pastel filters to harvest likes. And then they even dare to moralize others for just criticizing.

In the end, all that’s left is the cosmic void — the very reversal of human evolution. But … today I feel optimistic in humanity 😅 — it’s always my dominant Jupiter in Aquarius playing that trick on me.

Just to be clear: I’ve deliberately left out the name of the page that posted this. It’s not my intention to expose anyone or turn people into a target to attack or “sink.”

Let’s keep it witty and straight to the point — that’s our style. We don’t have to play their game. We already have our own way, and it works. 😉

What I’d like is simply to push whoever runs this kind of pages to actually think about what they’re doing. I have no reason to assume they’re acting with bad intentions — which is exactly why the hope is that they start using their own judgment, instead of just reproducing a narrative blindly.

✨ And now, let’s see if today I get wrapped in darkness again. That would be the clearest proof — that certain folks can’t handle a critique without pulling the usual mass-report trick. Their reaction is never direct never a reply, always the same move. But hey, maybe this time they’ll surprise us in a positive way. If not… we’ll know they didn’t get the point at all. Let’s check together if there is life on Mars.

MadLiv 💫

P.S. Who knows, maybe this will be the last day of the MG Saga. Taking everything into account, if a statement — whether confirming or denying — were ever to drop before the restart, tonight through tomorrow would basically be the golden window.

Today’s extra twist: turns out the new trick isn’t just recycling old stuff, but dressing it up as if it were brand-new. A physiotherapist gave a simple interview, saying Max wanted to relax with family and friends after Abu Dhabi 2021 — flying back to Monaco because that’s the way “he really unloads”. No MG in sight.

But voilà: a Minions’ page stitches it to a four-year-old article, and suddenly an old anecdote gets sold as today’s headline. Past repackaged as present — voilà, instant “news.”

Fun fact: the whole thing only ever popped up on Grandprix.com back in 2021, and the supposed Bild source is impossible to find online. The only Bild interview with Marko is from December 6th, 2021 and says nothing of the sort.

Correction 20:50 CET (partially): there is indeed a Bild (magazine, not the daily NewsPaper , diff things)article, but it actually refers back to statements given to Sky, so it’s not a Dr.Marko’s interview 🤔👇🏻

(And thank you, as always, to those who send me these gems 🦊)

[aasastrosblog]

So apparently my PR analysis post is now living side by side with boobs and bundas. Versatility unlocked 🌌🍑 Maybe this is what they call “organic engagement” 📈

Disclaimer: this is a TUMBLR moment—NSFW content is real 😂

MG Saga - Season Finale - Diary - Day 10 - August 18th 2025 - When his fanpages turn into Max’s biggest problem

For months and months now, Max has taken a very clear line: K is no longer mentioned as a partner. That’s not a slip, that’s a deliberate choice. You can see the turning point if you go back through interviews and socials. From then on, he started scaling back the role of Mini P too and carefully separating his public image.

It’s not a lack of affection. It’s a boundary. His words and his actions both say the same thing: “I talk about my daughter Lily and my own family. The rest is no longer part of my story.” And that deserves to be respected.

The problem is that some people keep putting words in his mouth, or amplifying K’s content as if it represented his will. But it doesn’t. The whole “dad of Mini P” narrative for example has never come from him — it’s present just in K’s and her fanpages content. Its effect is twofold: first, it makes it harder for him to walk away publicly, since it could frame him as the man connected not to one but now two children. Second, this framing reduces the visibility of Mini P’s biological father in the public narrative. That’s not about love. That’s media pressure.

If you need concrete examples, they’re everywhere.

Max keeps it simple:

• he focuses only on Lily and his own family (“My priority right now is Lily and my family”),

• he omits K as a partner (no mentions in interviews, no posts with her),

• and he frames himself as a father and an athlete (sharing moments with his parents, his sister, or in the racing context).

Meanwhile K runs the opposite playbook:

• pushing the “family of four” frame (like posting IG stories of Max with Mini P right after media point out his absence),

• alternating between “single mom” and “happy family” modes (mixing solo shots with family carousels),

• and presenting Max as ‘dad of two,’ which makes any separation appear more complicated

And here’s the thing: every time people reblog her posts with “family goals,” every time they frame him as “dad of two,” they’re pulling against him. They’re adding weight to a narrative that he has been quietly cutting away from his life for months. What might look harmless online doesn’t stay online. It puts pressure on his real life.

That’s why the line is simple: you don’t feed someone else’s narrative — especially when it’s been built to apply pressure. Max has already spoken, not with one big announcement but with months and months of consistent omissions and choices. In his communication he consistently leaves K out, focusing instead on Lily and his family of origin. If you respect him, respect that line.

K can continue with her own communication choices. That’s her strategy. But it’s not on anyone else to amplify them. Don’t become complicit. Don’t become a pawn.

And maybe this is the part people miss: these aren’t fairytales, they’re PR strategies. Not just here — in general. That’s how celebrity storytelling works. Fans of Max can see it clearly if they actually look and listen carefully : months of interviews and posts that line up with what he says. The consistency is there.

And those who claim to be fans of K, if they even exist, should really ask themselves what they’re amplifying. Because it isn’t romance or sentiment. It’s just PR tool. And you’re being used as free distribution.

That’s the real difference. One side speaks with clarity and consistency. The other only survives if people let themselves be turned into unpaid PR agents.

Don’t become a pawn!

Liv💫

Pic Credit Ig @maxverstappen1

Pic Credit Tiktok @verstappenxs

[aasastrosblog]

Loved your latest post AAS! Completely agree with everything written and I really appreciate how you take the time to explore the nuances of the various elements that are slowly coming together to signify the death knell of Kelly's weird "we're a happy family" show.

I do wonder if the reason those pro-Kelly minions began attacking people who were pointing out the oddities/inconsistencies we've been seeing in the Max/Kelly dynamic is because those observations hit a little too close to home? The posts the minions highlighted focused on (1) breastfeeding/potential lying, (2) Kelly calling L "her" daughter, and (3) a post questioning the strength of Kelly and Max's relationship because Max's family was vacationing with them.

I have to wonder if those 3 call-outs hit Kelly hard cause they're uncomfortably close to the truth 🤔

Thanks for your thoughtful note! 💛

Basically just censorship trying on an ‘indignation’ costume.

Personally, I don’t think those posts were singled out because of their content but because of their tone. Probably they were perceived (or made to appear) as the “most aggressive” ones — so the reaction could amplify the “look how I’m being attacked” narrative. It’s less about the actual points raised, more about how they could be used to “cover” the content and dramatize the situation 👀.

And that fits into a larger pattern we’ve seen these days: spam reports, random silencing attempts, and selective highlighting. Same toolbox, different tricks.

Now, her minions’ fanpages (if they even truly exist as organic accounts) look almost editorial: everything comes out in sync, coordinated, with the same angle repeated across multiple pages at the same time. That doesn’t happen by chance - and whoever decides that line surely had no intention of giving free visibility to the accounts involved, even if it probably happened anyways 🤓

And honestly, I’d completely exclude “content” as the real focus — also because that would imply actual interest in debate and the only clear editorial line they follow is one that embraces the cosmic void itself… not exactly a place where content (or discussion) lives 🤣.

[aasastrosblog]

Astroanswers: Versteamy was just the prequel 👀✨ Now it’s time for the sequel — should we go with Versdreamy (aka the ideal partner search arc) or do you have better suggestions? Drop them in, I’m curious!

[aasastrosblog]

MG Saga - Diary - Day 11 - August 19th, 2025 - “Those evil Tumblr bloggers”

Funny how the fanpages keep pushing the same script: “Those evil Tumblr bloggers are the reason Max and Kelly don’t post anymore.”

Making public town-square call-outs like it’s still the Middle Ages — and honestly, it’s pretty clear they never moved on from there. The Renaissance? Not even a shadow of it.

Meanwhile… he literally dropped three pics yesterday — after years of silence — and guess what? He’s alone, kite surfing. No “family portrait,” no “PR-perfect setup.” No “narrative” or pose. Just him, portrayed by his sister.

She didn’t even like the post — and up until ten days ago, she would’ve thrown a heart at literally anything: from the most irrelevant ads to even a burping contest, just to mark her territory.

Minion pages, shocked and silent 😐, carry on with their mission of reanimating old photos and videos — hoping no one notices they’re posting stuff from 53 B.C.

And speaking of “these evil Tumblr bloggers” again — come on, minions, you’re right: your heroine Kelly is definitely not the kind of lady who puts her life on display every other day. She never showed her daughters, “family moments,” endless carousel pics, or those carefully timed paparazzi shots magically leaked by you.

Nooo, of course not. You’re absolutely right.

She’s just “being silenced by blogs,” so she had no choice but to stay invisible. Poor thing.

Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Now let’s be clear: if you decide to live online, you don’t get a free pass from criticism. You can’t sell me every product under the sun, turn every corner of your life into a paid #ad, and then act shocked when people analyze or criticize. That’s how visibility works.

And it doesn’t work on your terms.

You act, and there’s a reaction.

No, you can’t expect everything to be wrapped up in pink ribbons. Surely we live in an era where truth gets sugarcoated, endings get rewritten, and the “bad” gets erased — because apparently we can’t stand it anymore.

And the result? A flattened society where people can’t even tell good from evil or accepting criticism, because we’ve trained ourselves to only see happy endings and pastel filters.

But you can’t blame people who don’t want to anesthetize their minds.

So, minions… pick up a book, reconnect with the real world, and spare us the useless moral lessons we’re all tired of.

Breaking news: social media are an option. Real life isn’t — you’re born into it, you live it whether you want to or not. But social media? They’re not mandatory. They’re a choice. And if you make that choice, then you also choose to face the reactions that come with it.

Otherwise, feel free to go offline, move to the mountains, raise goats — I promise no Tumblr blogger will chase you there. 🐐✨

“Evil Tumblr blogger aasastro”, Liv💫

[aasastrosblog]

Hi, I'm here too...

I chose Scorpio because you resonated with the sign's characteristics. Intuition and determination. But I guess that's what life's surprises are, right? The best comes unexpectedly... Greetings from an Aries 😉

Scorpio energy 🔥 — with Pluto ruling strong in my chart, maybe you weren’t that off after all 😅💛 hugs back to an Aries ♈😉

[aasastrosblog]

MG Saga - Season Finale - Diary - Day 10 - August 18th 2025 - When his fanpages turn into Max’s biggest problem

For months and months now, Max has taken a very clear line: K is no longer mentioned as a partner. That’s not a slip, that’s a deliberate choice. You can see the turning point if you go back through interviews and socials. From then on, he started scaling back the role of Mini P too and carefully separating his public image.

It’s not a lack of affection. It’s a boundary. His words and his actions both say the same thing: “I talk about my daughter Lily and my own family. The rest is no longer part of my story.” And that deserves to be respected.

The problem is that some people keep putting words in his mouth, or amplifying K’s content as if it represented his will. But it doesn’t. The whole “dad of Mini P” narrative for example has never come from him — it’s present just in K’s and her fanpages content. Its effect is twofold: first, it makes it harder for him to walk away publicly, since it could frame him as the man connected not to one but now two children. Second, this framing reduces the visibility of Mini P’s biological father in the public narrative. That’s not about love. That’s media pressure.

If you need concrete examples, they’re everywhere.

Max keeps it simple:

• he focuses only on Lily and his own family (“My priority right now is Lily and my family”),

• he omits K as a partner (no mentions in interviews, no posts with her),

• and he frames himself as a father and an athlete (sharing moments with his parents, his sister, or in the racing context).

Meanwhile K runs the opposite playbook:

• pushing the “family of four” frame (like posting IG stories of Max with Mini P right after media point out his absence),

• alternating between “single mom” and “happy family” modes (mixing solo shots with family carousels),

• and presenting Max as ‘dad of two,’ which makes any separation appear more complicated

And here’s the thing: every time people reblog her posts with “family goals,” every time they frame him as “dad of two,” they’re pulling against him. They’re adding weight to a narrative that he has been quietly cutting away from his life for months. What might look harmless online doesn’t stay online. It puts pressure on his real life.

That’s why the line is simple: you don’t feed someone else’s narrative — especially when it’s been built to apply pressure. Max has already spoken, not with one big announcement but with months and months of consistent omissions and choices. In his communication he consistently leaves K out, focusing instead on Lily and his family of origin. If you respect him, respect that line.

K can continue with her own communication choices. That’s her strategy. But it’s not on anyone else to amplify them. Don’t become complicit. Don’t become a pawn.

And maybe this is the part people miss: these aren’t fairytales, they’re PR strategies. Not just here — in general. That’s how celebrity storytelling works. Fans of Max can see it clearly if they actually look and listen carefully : months of interviews and posts that line up with what he says. The consistency is there.

And those who claim to be fans of K, if they even exist, should really ask themselves what they’re amplifying. Because it isn’t romance or sentiment. It’s just PR tool. And you’re being used as free distribution.

That’s the real difference. One side speaks with clarity and consistency. The other only survives if people let themselves be turned into unpaid PR agents.

Don’t become a pawn!

Liv💫

Pic Credit Ig @maxverstappen1

Pic Credit Tiktok @verstappenxs

[aasastrosblog]

https://www.tumblr.com/aasastrosblog/792209336287019008/with-yesterdays-chaos-and-blackout-i-totally?source=share

Kind of weird if I say I didn't have a very deep motive? I don't know much about signs but I like to read what you write and you always seem like someone who is outgoing and seeks justice, so I chose Sagittarius. I don't know much about the sign, only that it's associated with people who value sincerity and fairness—and it just felt right to me. But I think I made a mistake 😅💛

Aww ✨ thank you so much, your reasoning honestly made me smile! Sagittarius is a great sign (even if it’s MG’s 🤣👀 — but I kind of balance it out mentally with my brother who is Sag too). In the end it was just a game, so there aren’t really any “wrong” answers 💛💫 anyway, here’s a Pisces 🐠

[aasastrosblog]

With yesterday’s chaos and blackout I totally forgot about this 😅 All three of my “luminaries” — my sun sign (aka the one the poll was about 🌞), my moon sign, and my rising — got zero votes 🤣. Top picks were Virgo and Scorpio (2 each), followed by other ones with 1 vote. If you feel like it, drop me an anon telling me what you voted for and why — I’m curious 🧐

[aasastrosblog]

For those asking what happened — this blog has been, for who knows how many hours , wrapped in darkness yesterday. Others got called out in the town square,

Liv 💫

[aasastrosblog]

MG Saga - Diary - Day 9 - August 17th, 2025- Soft Launch Liberation Day Recap

So here’s the domino effect in action:

• It all started with De Telegraaf. They didn’t have to, but they did: “Verstappen himself is in none of the photos. He’s enjoying the F1 summer break instead…”

• That one line turned a sweet “100 days of Lily” album into a two-track headline: celebration plus absence.

• And once the biggest Dutch daily frames it like that? Everyone else joins the party. AD, De Gelderlander, Nieuwsblad, GP Today, even GPFans cranking it up with fan comments like “hard to believe he’s actually the father.”

• By the time the Times of India jumps in with a straight up “Where’s the father?”, the echo chamber is complete.

Absence wasn’t just noticed — it was enlightened into news.

Right on cue, her fan pages suddenly push out “paparazzi” shots of MG and Max on a Toto’s boat.

• Two days ago: the same boat, but only Max + the TP (aka the ones who make headlines).

• Today: the desperate add-on. Same setting, just trying to squeeze into the narrative, with a touch of “please don’t let me trend as the dumped girlfriend.”

📌 So here we are:

De Telegraaf set the tone.

The press ran with it.

And now she’s running after the storyline — chasing it, one staged “pap shot” at a time.

His strategy? No announcement. Connect the dots yourselves.

From now until September 30, it’s basically the separation arc in slow motion.

Liv 💫

[aasastrosblog]

:)

[aasastrosblog]

[aasastrosblog]

It’s happening, again.

Dear Mg, you can come around here trying to ‘clean things up,’ but you’re still the one who just got dumped 🫶🏻 see ya

[aasastrosblog]

MG Saga - Diary - Day 9 - August 17th, 2025- Update — press roundup with direct quotes 👇

• De Telegraaf 🇳🇱 (national daily): 🚨

“Verstappen zelf is op geen enkele foto te bekennen. Wel geniet hij momenteel thuis van de zomerstop…”

→ “Verstappen himself is in none of the photos. He is instead enjoying the F1 summer break at home…”

• AD (Algemeen Dagblad) 🇳🇱 (national daily):

“Verstappen verschijnt zelf niet op de foto’s, maar wel zijn neefjes die met de kleine spelen.”

→ “Verstappen himself does not appear in the photos, but his nephews, who are playing with the little one, do.”

• De Gelderlander 🇳🇱 (regional daily):

“Verstappen zelf is niet op de foto’s te zien, maar zijn neefjes komen wel voorbij in de reeks.”

→ “Verstappen himself is not seen in the photos, but his nephews do appear in the series.”

• Nieuwsblad.be 🇧🇪 (Belgian daily):

“Verstappen zelf is op geen enkele foto te bekennen. Wel geniet hij momenteel thuis van de zomerstop…”

→ “Verstappen himself is in none of the photos. He is instead enjoying the F1 summer break at home…”

• Times of India 🌍 (international daily):

→ “Where’s the father? Fans question Max Verstappen’s absence as Kelly Piquet shares Lily’s new photo album.”

• GP Today 🇳🇱 (F1 specialist):

“Max Verstappen komt niet voor op de foto’s.”

→ “Max Verstappen does not appear in the photos.”

• GPFans NL 🇳🇱 (F1 specialist):

“Waar is Max met Lily? Het is moeilijk te begrijpen dat hij daadwerkelijk de vader is.”

→ “Where is Max with Lily? It’s hard to understand that he is actually the father.”

• Story.nl 🇳🇱 (gossip magazine):

“… sinds de geboorte van Lily niet veel foto’s gepost met Max… volgers merken het op.”

→ “… since Lily’s birth not many photos with Max have been posted… followers notice it.”

• Parade.com 🇺🇸 (lifestyle magazine):

→ “It sure would be nice to see Daddy and Lily, too.”

[aasastrosblog]

Hi Liv! Can you maybe do a reading regarding Max's thoughts on Kelly's family? Does he actually like spending so much time with them? Thank you! ✨️

A note before I dive in — astrology It’s not like tarot: I’ve literally never held a deck in my life 😅. Sorry 🥲.

It has been around since Babylon, systematized by Ptolemy, then reframed by Jung as a symbolic language for the psyche. For me, it was taught by a family member who’s a Jungian psychiatrist, and I later integrated it with part of my own academic studies (psychology of communication, body language, etc). So when I ‘read,’ I don’t do fortune-telling — I use astrology as one more lens to recognize psychological patterns - and most of all my friend’s chaotic love dramas 🤣🫶🏻.

The only thing that I read - beyond personality and compatibility - that comes close to being predictive are transits, always because of Jung’s idea of synchronicity… but even there, free will always comes first.

That’s why I can’t really answer your question: to look at complex family dynamics I’d need at least one clear subject (with birth data for a natal chart) and then some visual interactions.

For instance, with Junior, given his proximity and known data birth, I could get an idea of how things are going — but it’s never ‘this is happening or this will happen’ but here’s the pattern he’s moving through, I don’t know of this can be interesting for you.

Sorry if I sound long-winded as always ✨ Hope that makes sense and I didn’t disappoint,

Liv 💫

[aasastrosblog]

but at least we should have the dignity not to sell it back as a coincidence and maybe say thank you before you copy-paste the homework next time // AAS, I'm sorry but I fear this might have been me! I was in the Max tag this morning and saw your post and clicked on the link to the newspaper and was so shocked by what I read I went ahead and asked Flower about it because I was curious about her opinion. I didn't mean to not credit you for being the first to talk about the article 🧡

no worries — I just meant the ones who like to pick stuff up around here and drop it on other platforms 👀✨