dotversion2

[dotversion2]

One of the funniest things about you Marvel bitches is how much you suck at making gifs

[dotversion2]

hey what is happening in warcraft anymore

[dotversion2]

its been about 6 months

[dotversion2]

[dotversion2]

in absolute tears about the pride module at my work

[dotversion2]

Canto IX tomorrow.

[dotversion2]

I am a huge fan of retiring to my quarters

[dotversion2]

harry dubois would end death note in one episode. he'd be unkillable bc he has no fucking idea what his name is and then he'd go drink driving and accidentally run light over and the killings would mysteriously stop

[dotversion2]

Mon dieu ze are mogging on us

It's about grief. It's about letting go. It's about fighting on. It's about family. It's about the existential horror of mimes.

It's about escapism. It's about surviving despite it all. It's about the wonder of the world even in darkness. It's about mimes beating the shit out of you.

It's about love. It's about heartbreak. It's about who the fuck put all those mimes here

[dotversion2]

never forget what they took from us.

[dotversion2]

ed zitron, a tech beat reporter, wrote an article about a recent paper that came out from goldman-sachs calling AI, in nicer terms, a grift. it is a really interesting article; hearing criticism from people who are not ignorant of the tech and have no reason to mince words is refreshing. it also brings up points and asks the right questions:

if AI is going to be a trillion dollar investment, what trillion dollar problem is it solving?

what does it mean when people say that AI will "get better"? what does that look like and how would it even be achieved? the article makes a point to debunk talking points about how all tech is misunderstood at first by pointing out that the tech it gets compared to the most, the internet and smartphones, were both created over the course of decades with roadmaps and clear goals. AI does not have this.

the american power grid straight up cannot handle the load required to run AI because it has not been meaningfully developed in decades. how are they going to overcome this hurdle (they aren't)?

people who are losing their jobs to this tech aren't being "replaced". they're just getting a taste of how little their managers care about their craft and how little they think of their consumer base. ai is not capable of replacing humans and there's no indication they ever will because...

all of these models use the same training data so now they're all giving the same wrong answers in the same voice. without massive and i mean EXPONENTIALLY MASSIVE troves of data to work with, they are pretty much as a standstill for any innovation they're imagining in their heads

[dotversion2]

my girl maggey is blogging from prison in a maid dress

[dotversion2]

[dotversion2]

[dotversion2]

Do you want your handjob crazy hand style or master hand style

[dotversion2]

do me a solid and just reblog this saying what time it is where you are and what you’re thinking about in the tags.

[dotversion2]

[x]