edwinqobx786-blog

[edwinqobx786-blog]

How To Turn Legal Services Into Success

As I've researched this story of the tangled, deceitful, web-like lines of entrapment, which appear to have entangled the lives of several Bakersfield and Fresno area residents; I think I have found the spider in the center of the web. There has been much talk inside news lately of "liberal judges," "Activist Judges," "Extremist Judges" and "Partisan Judges." Yet one kind of judge, which is not being discussed, could be the old-fashioned "Corrupt Judge." To me it may be the corrupt judge, the individual that works well with bribes, for favors, or who hands out bribes and favors to others, that is certainly at the rotten core of the items is wrong using this type of country's legal system. Judge Lawrence J. O'Neil, I think, qualifies of one in the great corrupt judges in our time!

Why do I feel that? The IRS case against Dr. Steven V. Booth alone shows how corrupt this judge Lawrence J. O'Neil is. He started by signing a vague and suspect search warrant for that IRS. The warrant would have been to search the premises of Dr. Booth and another defendant; it turned out so vague it seemed to be an excuse to easily ransack the citizen's homes. The homes were ransacked, money and the personal property went missing and the co-defendants' lawyers called them on it. Judge Lawrence J. O'Neil was just a magistrate. You see magistrate judges simply have statutory authority and when someone challenges the things they're doing, which someone did, they've got no authority to make a decision their case, instead, it needs to be heard by an Article Three Federal Judge. Lawrence J. O'Neil was not legally supposed to rule on whether their own signed warrant was valid after it was questioned. He really should have rescued himself. Instead, he buried true until he was catapulted from as a magistrate to being a fully-fledged Federal Judge after being nominated by President G.W. Bush in 2007. Oddly, true involving his signing of the disputed search warrant like a magistrate now came under his jurisdiction! O'Neil needs to have recused himself therefore also. This is what he did wrong, he ruled on his search warrant as to if it turned out valid or invalid just because IRS was making their criminal case against Dr. Booth with his fantastic co-defendant. Evidence was then submitted with the IRS which should do not have been allowed. Talk about letting the fox guard the henhouse!

Judge Lawrence J. O'Neil then went on being one with the most arrogant, heartless and cruel judges around the Federal Court dais. He continually handed down severe, almost medieval sentences. He quashed bills about cutting California carbon emissions in favor with the Big Oil companies. He was said by his colleagues being an extremist judge. Yet, what he was quoted saying and did to Dr. Booth's co-defendant was indeed a criminal offence bred beyond corruption. Judge Lawrence was washing the backs from the IRS since they washed his. The co-defendant is made aware by several friends and attorneys that there would have been a cabal of judges and lawyers in Fresno which had just about staked a claim on the Federal Courts. Anyone crossing this gang of corrupt personages was bound to feel their wrath. In his case, whenever the co-defendant attempted to come up with a motion in order to save himself, Lawrence O'Neil quashed it. He would not reverse his decision on the search warrant, allowing evidence to get delivered to the truth that's outright circumstantial. "Right to your speedy trial" to the co-defendant? Denied! Then, mixing the trial of Booth with all the co-defendant as though that they had been some sort of criminal cohorts, O'Neil allowed Booth's perjured testimony being seen as "proof" the co-defendant had bilked the federal government from huge amounts of money! Calling Booth's trust manager a "slick, cagey, wily con-man who was just upset over getting caught, instead of having committed a criminal offense" he sentenced him to 9 long years in Federal prison, using the IRS "$4,000,000.00 estimate" of the items Booth owed them, as being a basis for the harsh sentencing! Even though he knew full-well that Booth only owed $207,000, which his tax burden had nothing to do with his co-defendant's case.

However, it gets worse. For the co-defendant, himself reported if you ask me an attorney for that court was ushered into his cell, (not into an anteroom or meeting room and other area where most such conversations take place in prison, but in the defendant's cell, as though he were some kind of Death Row inmate). There he was offered a deal. It seems that Judge Lawrence J. O'Neil did not think he was doing conning the federal government. Instead, he was angry as hell he may not deed in the properties in the portfolio time for Booth. So now, O'Neil was cutting an arrangement on the part of Booth and also the IRS! If the co-defendant would simply turn over his 5% portion of the properties, and convince the corporation he worked for to offer over their 95%, however be released. Case closed. Records expunged.

Now this man faced a genuine dilemma. Either take action patently wrong because the IRS had convinced a jury that every various trusts involved were "shams," although be signing documents that said this was correct and true, that he was obviously a criminal and his life's work a sham. He would be relinquishing properties, which are legally bought and purchased and mostly within the hands of a corporation he worked for, which may be also seen to become disreputable if he did as Judge Lawrence J. O'Neil demanded. He would then must try to convince his partners to do likewise. Then however be freed. Or, he could refuse and spend nine years in prison. He was put between your veritable rock plus a hard place. His wife needed him out and. His associates needed him to get out, and not only that, his reputation re-established. His kids needed him. His community needed him. He is in jail and anxious for freedom. Yet if he did what Lawrence J. O'Neil asked, however be denying every principle he ever stood for or supported.

After a long evening of prayer, he gave his reply to his wife and his attorney and Lawrence J. O'Neil. "No deal." This man had chosen prison over lying and wrongdoing. He would not give in the properties to the IRS. Instead, he would fight all of them. Now you inform me, what con-man, with an offer like this, that may free him to carry out his daily confidence games, would NOT have taken the deal? Only a genuine man would say "I'm residing in jail!" In the finish, Judge Lawrence O'Neil's evil plan did not work. This is only as they was facing down a decent man; someone who would not roll over and play his games.

The co-defendant inside the Booth criminal case was finally released on appeal. He remains under house arrest, not able to work, to make a living, to travel or even just to walk to the local store. He wears a Federally mandated ankle alarm bracelet, which the Feds want him to pay for even though they've disallowed him the right to work! They still work their evil machinations against this man who stood up to them and to the vile Judge Lawrence J. O'Neil, who sentences men to 750 years in prison and doesn't care if his children choke about the noxious polluted air of California, providing that his Big Oil bedfellows are happy.

Having heard all of this I realized, Judge Lawrence J. O'Neil will be the wily, cagey con-artist here. He's fat deposits spider spinning the web to entrap and entangle innocent people. He does it for power and favor and cash. He's the ringleader from the Fresno/IRS gang, chasing after chiropractors and business managers as opposed to drug lords and crime king-pins. This man needs being exposed. He's not fit being a judge. And he needs to get in a very cell somewhere contemplating his failings, instead of lording it over others.