Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
My wife is a huge arachnophobe … so unfortunately they gon die


🕷
450 notes
·
View notes
Text
25 notes
·
View notes
Text
Most people will go their entire lives without knowing what the ridges on the edge of coins were originally for.
28 notes
·
View notes
Text
It’s awful how lefties fear-monger about Social Security, but that doesn’t mean it’s not in trouble. It is. We all know it is. Just not how the left portrays it. It’s just groaning under its own weight and sooner or later, likely sooner, the Hill is going to have to tackle it. Being the pedantic, unoriginal cowards that they are, they’ll likely look to the past for how to do it. What’s back there?
Obama.
Obama showed them how they might do it.
Let’s take a walk down memory lane.
Your money, in the form of the CFPB (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau) and your life, in the form of the IPAB (Independent Payment Advisory Board, sometimes known as “the death panel”), are two 2010 agencies which are now dead, or about to be, thank God, but there is where our brave legislators will find their “inspiration” for how to fix Social Security, I am willing to bet. Why? There’s a very specific reason why — a legislative scam — as you will see in a moment.
Let’s review: In March & July 2010 two of the most sweeping pieces of legislation since FDR and LBJ were signed by Obama, creating the IPAB via ObamaCare, and the CFPB via the Dodd-Frank Wall Street “reform” bill. Legislators buried these agencies so deep inside the federal leviathan that they could not simply vote to defund them. This was purposeful. So the only way to kill them, should they or the voters desire it, was to hope the Executive Branch would choose to kill them, or, as is the case with the IPAB, die of neglect.
6 notes
·
View notes
Text
Watching less cartoons will be good for most of tumblr

97K notes
·
View notes
Text
21 notes
·
View notes
Text
Autism has apparently been linked to Neanderthal DNA positively enough to conclude certain symptoms are indeed early survival mechanisms.it also explains the prominence of autism in people of Eurasian genetic descent. The future success of their progeny supports my existing theory that autism has driven human progress from the start.
Bearing this in mind, we can positively conclude that DNA, and therefore race, can determine predisposition to certain neurodivergence. What I propose is that neurodivergence is just genetic traits in general that can be rooted in historical cultures.
Think of it like this:
Germans and Scandinavians are very autistic, culturally
The Irish are very ADHD, culturally
I’m sure you can imagine more and I don’t think any of them are wrong
86 notes
·
View notes