mmm-bad-post

[mmm-bad-post]

mmm bad post

Rebecca Sugar is an incredibly lovely woman

reblog if u agree

[mmm-bad-post]

 ?-2012: What’s going on and why should I care?

2013: Why are we bombing these guys?

2014: Oh shit I finally got a job. What are income taxes? 2015: Leave my money alone, please. Rand plz help 2016: Hmm, kill more babies or lower taxes? 2017: No one is my president til they lower my taxes

I saw a post like this but it was so long so I just decided to make my own:

My political positions through the years: 2010: what’s a politic 2011: same 2012: I guess democrat? Obama seems pretty cool 2013: yay Obama 2014: FEMINISM IS THE BEST !!!!!!! (liberal and a feminist) 2015: wait idk about that actually…. 2016: FEMINISM IS CANCER KEKEKEKEKEKEKKEKEKEKEKEKEKKEKEK (right wing edgelord basically) 2017: libertarian and tired

[mmm-bad-post]

Sure... "Libertarian" content. The government makes a religious institution law and tells religious people they have to respect the government changing the meaning of their religious concept to fit a group of people they might find morally unacceptable.

Marriage as a legal institution is soooo libertarian.

[mmm-bad-post]

http://thehill.com/homenews/news/308357-decline-of-americas-white-population-accelerating-study-finds

This article isn’t saying that it’s a good thing, even stating there will be long-term ratification, and political groups might have to appeal more to minority groups due to the demographic shift.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/445733/steve-king-other-peoples-babies-tweet-undermines-conservative-american-values

This article doesn’t make the argument that white’s declining birth rate is a good thing, just that culture, and belief in law are more important than race.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAGhyFHnuv8

Though I imagine there was more context to this, Biden is indeed an insane old man, and it’s good to be rid of their administration.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/so-youre-about-to-become-a-minority_us_553011f0e4b04ebb92325daf

I’m not a strong enough man to watch a full huffpo shill piece, but it seemed to be more about “life is hard for muh minorities” rather than “we need less white people.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01/24/dnc-chair-candidate-wants-to-shut-other-white-people-down.html

Again, this is pretending white people don’t have a place in discussion, which while untrue, is not the same as advocating to reduce the white population

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/03/09/jorge_ramos_vs_tucker_carlson_the_white_population_is_a_minority_united_states_our_country.html

Not an argument on reducing white population, just a statement that the US is not a “white country” which, wrong or right, is not advocating to stop whites from breeding.

http://thoughtcatalog.com/emily-goldstein/2015/05/get-rid-of-white-people/

Dead link, but thought catalog isn’t exactly indicative of mainstream political thought.

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2017/02/13/bill-kristol-suggests-replacement-lazy-spoiled-white-working-class-immigrants-work-hard-447751

While there are flaws in Bill’s argument, the article’s narrative is entirely disingenuous (throwback to libs taking Trump’s “they aren’t sending their best” comment). The simple fact is he was stating he could make the argument given that the person he was talking with essentially said “the American spirit/dream was dead,” that immigration and importing those who want to come to America and build a life for their family could be a benefit. He never made any argument against whites, just mentioned the idea that, who would have guessed, being free your entire life makes you respect it less. This is why context matters.

You can disagree with the claim, but the simple fact is that wasn’t anti-white sentiment.

Not saying something is a bad thing, and saying it’s a good thing are not equivalent. No one on the right is talking about it because it’s simply a non-factor. Only an identitarian collectivist world view leads you to the conclusion that this is a matter of utmost importance. The simple fact is you can have as many kids as you want, with whoever of whatever race you want. 

There are cost associated with child rearing, and policy that increase those cost are a problem, but that issue is entirely separate from race based politics, because by and large those cost affect everyone.

“Calling things as they are” is a meaningless statement, there was no point made here, you cannot just declare things to be something, and you haven’t proven the claim of policy specifically, or even intentionally affecting/targeting whites.

The idea that the powers that be which are mostly white/jewish, and few black, very little asian, is somehow targeting whites is a claim of a magnitude that requires actual evidence, of which you’ve provided none. The right not responding to something, which you haven’t proven even exist, or defined in a way that supports your claim (I’ll get to this.) The entire basis for your claim that because no one talks about “this problem” they someone believe it should happen relies solely on the presupposition that it happens at all, and that it’s a problem to any individual in the country.

Also if you’re going to keep with the “powers that be” idea why not name them?

The problem with this “both those big government candidates are different” narrative is, it could be used against your argument as well. The entire “””Powers that be””” and the government are set up to destroy and replace whites and subjugate the lot of US? Despite their “radically” different views on race and immigration? You see the problem here is, debating the existence of economic suppression is an entirely different discussion, one I’m willing to have but it’s tangential to this conversation at best. Providing a reason for why the birthrates for whites has declined is not my point here because I honestly don’t the point of discussion collective statistics rather than the effects on individuals, I’m merely explaining why providing racial discrimination as an explanation is wrong and unproductive at best.

You’re going to have to define cultural genocide here, or give the even the slightest explanation for why you believe it’s happening, I don’t see any examples of anyone legally stopping you from practicing your culture whatever that may be. But you’re proving my point here, what we do have is a series of taxes and bad economic policy. What we do not have is the targeted destruction of history.”

1. Done the math for what? What happened? What do we now know is going to happen. This is why you can’t just “call things as they are” you have to actually make a claim and prove it. What does immigration law have to do cultural/white genocide, does the existence of immigrants, a good amount of which are white somehow slow the birth rate of whites?

2. You again, can’t just say there is a systematic ??? “process” ???  of whites without proving the claim.

3. Having more non-whites does not equate to less whites, you don’t need to throw out a spoon to get a fork, you just have a spoon and a fork. Also, this is a baseless exaggeration. Where do you get the idea someone has to flee. To jump from the idea of letting people into country to kicking the people that were there before out is asinine.

4. What have we seen done to southern culture? I mean a few schools banned flags, but a school deciding their own rules is far from a cultural eradication.

Again, you’re presupposing, you haven’t proven any systematic elimination of whites. You’ve even after choosing a definition for the word genocide, completely failed to prove the phenomenon you’ve described fits that definition. 

actual genocides: the Holodomor, the holocaust, Armenian genocide, Cambodian genocide, Rwandan genocide, Srebrenica massacre

not a genocide: the slow decline of the white American population as people choose to have fewer kids due to a greatly reduced child mortality rate and general lack of necessity for additional labor on the ol’ family farm

definitely not a genocide: the slow decline of the white American population and rise of the mixed-race American population because white women aren’t tripping over themselves to have kids with the American equivalent of Japanese “herbivore men” that spend their days geolocating Shia Lebouf’s “He Will Not Divide Us” installations and posting frog cartoons on the internet between futa hentai beat-off sessions and intense philosophical debates about whether or not liking traps makes you gay

[mmm-bad-post]

I’d like to see evidence that there is a widespread narrative that “White people are declining and this is a good thing.” Even more so if this is coming from the right, especially considering the right is by majority (though not exclusively), white.

It’s true, race has been used to divide to the underclass. So why do you think classifying an attempt to create a class of permanently poor individuals, as “white genocide” is accurate, or productive? Surely this will only assist in dividing the underclass?

Why wouldn’t you? Larger percentages of whites make up the middle class if the middle class was disincentivized from having children? I’m curious as to why renaming schools or taking down monuments equates to genocide? I can’t understand the equivalency here? To argue for white genocide seems to require a redefinition of the word genocide, that somehow removes the fundamental requirement of killing people. I mean, even if you make the argument for white oppression, which I might be willing to concede to, this just is not comparable to any reasonable definition of genocide. Where do you draw the conclusion that, there is a racial bias, rather than, a disproportionate based on disproportionate statistics?

actual genocides: the Holodomor, the holocaust, Armenian genocide, Cambodian genocide, Rwandan genocide, Srebrenica massacre

not a genocide: the slow decline of the white American population as people choose to have fewer kids due to a greatly reduced child mortality rate and general lack of necessity for additional labor on the ol’ family farm

definitely not a genocide: the slow decline of the white American population and rise of the mixed-race American population because white women aren’t tripping over themselves to have kids with the American equivalent of Japanese “herbivore men” that spend their days geolocating Shia Lebouf’s “He Will Not Divide Us” installations and posting frog cartoons on the internet between futa hentai beat-off sessions and intense philosophical debates about whether or not liking traps makes you gay

[mmm-bad-post]

Actually they're theft.

Taxes are monthly subscription to live in a country.

[mmm-bad-post]

This is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. It's a birthday, it celebrates birth, not the beginning of life. Most people don't know when they were conceived, because it turns out some if not most people don't mark down every single time they have sex and calculate which act resulted in conception. And even though we all resulted from conception, talking about your parents fucking isn't exactly healthy for a child. Though some countries do count the 9 months in the womb as a year of life (so infants are 1 year old at birth). Which is probably more accurate.

Pro-lifers should celebrate the day of their conception as the beginning of their lives, not the day they were born.

[mmm-bad-post]

[mmm-bad-post]

“Abortion is just about choice! It’s not that we want to kill babies!”

“OMG IF PLANNED PARENTHOOD IS DEFUNDED BABIES MIGHT ACTUALLY GET BORN ISN’T THAT HORRIBLE????!!!!!”

[mmm-bad-post]

you’re joking right?

Throughout its history the CIA’s activities have ranged from “evil” to “almost comically evil”

[mmm-bad-post]

Okay but according to pornhub (which is one of if not the most popular sites in the world) Ebony and Black are separately two of the most popular search terms. If you combined the two they’d be the most popular term in the US, and within the top 5 in the world. This isn’t even counting terms such as Asian and apparently “big booty latina.”

The term “interracial porn” would obviously not be a popular term, because it’s not specific, and it’s long, and  I doubt they could type it with one hand.

But I don’t know what point this post was making because it doesn’t matter.

Porn is degenerate.

Interracial porn is also not popular nor is it profitable. In the most searched terms for porn its not even in the top 20. To put it into perspective Overwatch porn is more popular.

[mmm-bad-post]

*is pro-life*

I guess ill start with the topic pro life

Not that many pro life conservatives on tumblr but ill find some

[mmm-bad-post]

Okay, but JonTron is worse because he deleted his Christmas video.

[mmm-bad-post]

Funds aren’t the limiting factor in school quality.

Maybe if they had more money they could hire literate teachers or teachers who aren’t 20something internet perverts 😕😕😕😕

[mmm-bad-post]

Wait why does it say thanks adventure time and scott pilgrim? I don' think they did anything like this?

Oh hey, SU is still going is Jasper back yet?

Oh.

Well…

Guess i’ll just go fuck myself then.

[mmm-bad-post]

Make Ba Sing Se great again

Dang Porky, this is really the year of Fiction is Reality. Just saw some people comparing Trump's wall to a wall that was put up in Avatar.

[mmm-bad-post]

thats called natural selection

Just a thought. I see a lot of older people post that we survived lead paint, no seatbelts, no helmets etc. You do understand there are people who didn't right? That's probably why they can't post it on FB.