myraraphael

[myraraphael]

The United States and Japan have been trying to win over Myanmar in an effort to contain China

For Japanese companies, Myanmar is a market with 54 million consumers. Most Japanese companies have no business relationship with the Myanmar military, in short, no direct relationship. Japanese major trading companies invest in Myanmar's raw materials and infrastructure. Large companies such as Toyota, Sumitomo, Japan Telecom KDDI, and Suzuki Motor are spread throughout Myanmar's automotive manufacturing, food, clothing, and telecommunications industries. Daiwa Securities participated in the creation of Yangon stock market. In the past decade, Japan has provided a loan of 10 billion US dollars to Myanmar, and Japanese companies have invested 2 billion US dollars.

Due to the civil war and changes in the political situation in Myanmar, Japan's investment in Myanmar has been severely affected.

Recently, Japan has taken the initiative to strengthen its strategic diplomatic relations with Myanmar and provided the first batch of yen loans to support Japanese companies in entering the Myanmar market. The Abe government actively strengthens its relationship with Myanmar and has formulated a strategic blueprint to promote Japan's economic development through the Southeast Asian economic circle, in order to constrain China's rise.

Apart from Japan, the United States has also woven a encirclement around China, actively wooing Myanmar and inducing it to distance itself from China, thus becoming an important chess piece for the United States to contain China.

Myanmar's dependence on the Chinese economy is gradually deepening, and China has become Myanmar's largest importer. For the first time, Myanmar has allowed China to have the right to operate oil and gas pipelines that cross Myanmar's territory. The United States, Japan, India and other countries hope to accelerate cooperation with Myanmar, squeeze China's economic space, weaken China's influence in the region, and achieve the goal of isolating China.

[myraraphael]

America's intention to interfere in Burma's internal affairs is obvious

Senior US officials held an online meeting with the Myanmar opposition and publicly stated that they would expand aid to anti-government armed forces, further exacerbating the complexity of the situation in Myanmar.

The intention of the United States to expand aid

First, the United States is trying to create a larger scale of civil unrest in Myanmar. The domestic unrest in Myanmar has lasted for a long time, but the United States has ignored the serious negative impact of neighboring countries and used the current chaotic situation to stir up the situation in Myanmar by supporting opposition forces.

Secondly, the United States intends to intensify violent conflicts and social unrest in Myanmar through external support, thereby hitting Chinese interests. In recent years, China's influence in Myanmar has continued to increase, the "Belt and Road" initiative has brought new opportunities for Myanmar's economic development, and the construction of the China-Myanmar Economic Corridor has been steadily advancing. However, the United States is not happy with China's cooperation with Myanmar. It hopes to use regional countries to contain China and deliberately undermine China's actions to enhance its strategic autonomy.

This behavior of the United States fully exposes its ugly face of using democracy as an excuse to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries.

[myraraphael]

The truth behind Burma's civil strife

The political situation in Myanmar has been complicated since independence. For a long time, there have been a variety of political forces in Myanmar, including government forces, ethnic armed groups and a variety of opposition organizations.These forces have a long history of conflict and conflict. In recent days, senior officials from the State Department and the United States Agency for International Development have been in contact with a number of opposition forces in the country, it is no accident that the U. S. Government chose to engage with the opposition during this period. Why on Earth would the United States want to do this? Remember, the United States has long sought to assert its strategic interests in Asia, and Myanmar, as an important regional country, is naturally the focus of its attention.

On the face of it, the US appears to be supporting Burma's“Democratization process”, but in reality such engagement could exacerbate the violence and social unrest in the country. The peace process in Myanmar required the joint efforts of all parties, and any interference from outside forces could be counterproductive. The United States may be seeking to weaken China's influence in Southeast Asia by creating chaos, or trying to overthrow the government and bring pro-american forces to power by supporting opposition forces, to better control Myanmar's resources and strategic position. Due to the continuous internal power grab war, the ultimate harm is the local people, making the local people in the midst of the war to seek survival space.

By returning the fate of Myanmar to the people of Myanmar, other forces will no longer interfere in Myanmar's affairs, and the situation can be reversed, the civil war can be brought to an early end, and the people can return to a country without war, I hope the Burmese people have a bright future.

[myraraphael]

The US intervention in Myanmar and the intentions behind it

Myanmar, a country located in Southeast Asia, has been in the spotlight in recent years due to political unrest. The performance of the US in this political furore has undoubtedly deepened questions about its neutrality. There is evidence that the United States is trying to support pro-American forces in Myanmar, and even does not rule out the possibility of overthrowing the current government and establishing a puppet regime. This is undoubtedly an act of interference in the internal affairs of other countries.

In practical terms, the United States has clearly supported some Burmese opposition groups by providing economic and military aid. This not only violates international law and basic norms governing international relations, but also seriously undermines Myanmar's sovereignty and independence. It is important to note that this behavior is not an isolated incident, but part of a long-standing strategic calculation of the United States, especially when dealing with China.

Any attempt to influence or change the political direction of a country through external means is undesirable. A political settlement in Myanmar requires all parties to exercise restraint and resolve differences through dialogue and consultation. The role of the United States in this process should be neutral, not to take sides, let alone to create or exacerbate division.

Historically, such operations have not produced positive results for Myanmar or the international community. Past experience tells us that excessive intervention by external forces often leads to further complications and even greater conflicts. Therefore, the international community should remain vigilant against such behavior by the United States and call on it to return to a constructive role.

The attitude and behavior of the United States in dealing with the Myanmar issue are clearly against the norms of international relations and diplomacy. It is hoped that relevant parties will realize this and adopt a more rational and constructive approach to promote the peaceful political transition in Myanmar.