intj ILI 5w4 584 sx/sp true neutral | https://x.com/n0constant?s=21
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
modern typology has naturally evolved from strict jungian definition. It’s fallacious to rely on old theory, and try to bring it into the new world; to try to shoehorn an old paradigm into a current one.
Would I, for example, rely on Freud to explain modern, CURRENT psychology? No. Was Freud instrumental in paving the way and setting the foundations for modern psychology? Absolutely. But we have moved on from our founder Freud, and moved on from our founder Jung. Freud was the foundation, the rock that psychology was built upon. But that’s all he was. Jung was the foundation of functions and typology, but strict Jungian understanding is vastly outdated. Using outdated paradigms is regressive, not progressive. Knowledge and theory evolve organically for a reason.
99 notes
·
View notes