paulshultz

[paulshultz]

reblog and see what happens ;)

My free 0F here (click)

[paulshultz]

I can relate to this shit...

"Tonight 3 police cars and 5 officers were called…on me.

Every Monday after dropping Joshua off at basketball practice in Greenwood, I drive 4 minutes up the street to Starbucks to get some work done. Same spot, same time.

I usually set up, plug in, get about 30-45 minutes of work in, then order a drink from the app. (I don’t drink coffee, so I usually get a cold-pressed juice or Caramel Apple Spice.). I then work for another 30-minutes or so, and head back to get Joshua.

The last three Mondays, no problems at all. No one said anything. Barely a look.

But today, as soon as I walked in, one of the employees locked eyes on me — not trying to be obvious, but obvious enough. IYKYK.

I sat down, got to work. A few minutes later, he came over asking if I wanted to order. Strange…when does Starbucks come to your table to take your order? First time for me.

I told him, "I'm good for now — I'll order in a few. And when I order, I’ll do it from my phone (Starbucks app)."

Five minutes later, a second employee came over, telling me I couldn’t use WiFi without buying something. I told him the same thing: I understand. I‘ll order, just not immediately. I’ll order through the app.

Still, he kept pressing. I asked if he was new, because I've been doing this the past few Mondays with no issues. What I said was falling on deaf ears, or he just didn’t believe me.

So, I asked, “is there a problem with me?”

I mean the other guy looked at me like I didn’t belong or was up to something when I first came in…again IYKYK.

He started stammering, refused to give his name or the manager’s info when I asked — then said he was calling the police. I told him, "Go ahead. I’ll be right here."

He made the call, I began recording him and the other employees, then he ran behind a wall and told the others not to look at me. Actually, he said to them, “don’t make eye contact.” More strange stuff. 🤦🏽‍♂️

I went back to sit down, I called Stephana (via FaceTime), and waited for the police to come.

Three squad cars and five officers showed up QUICKLY. I was the only customer there.

The police handled it well. They calmly asked them what happened, then approached me and asked the same.

I calmly told them what happened, showed my past Starbucks app order receipts while explaining that I do this every week without issue, and we had a respectful conversation.

One officer got a Starbucks phone number for me from the employee who refused to give any info to me earlier.

However, the Starbucks employee said I was “trespassing.” So, I wasn’t allowed to order anything now, or stay — nor could I come back there again. That feeling was mutual.

I packed up, walked out (on my own), and had another good talk with one of the officers outside before we all drove away.

This is why many people of color are cautious about going south of the Indy I-465 loop. Not everyone is like this south of the loop — we have friends and know some good people who live south of the loop.

But stuff like this is crazy. And it's real. And it's exhausting.

I made it home safely, which as a black man in this country is a result that is not guaranteed when having an encounter with the police — especially when the police are called on you.

But it should’ve never happened in the first place.

I’ll be contacting Starbucks corporate — maybe this is their policy for employees to walk around to take orders at tables? 🤷🏽‍♂️

Or maybe it is their policy to call the police when they aren’t capable of having a conversation with a customer, or when they just aren’t comfortable with the presence of certain people in their store?

I don’t know, but I hope to find out.

And I'm willing to talk with leadership at that location. If anyone knows the owner or a manager at that location, I’m open to having a real conversation.

It’s the Starbucks located at 189 East Worthsville Road, Greenwood, IN 46143.

I’m not sure if anything will come from it, but I’m willing to see..."

[paulshultz]

Is Musk a Russian agent?

More information very similar to that shared before. Infiltration of private citizens' information by DOGE with accounts and passwords set up that were then immediately used from somewhere in Russia. I believe Musk is an actual Russian spy. Trump's a patsy, a useful idiot. Musk, however, got them direct access.

Alt National Park Service

otrospndeS0t4 m5m20l1107mpa 5tAi98iM f182f:1 08Prl57ca13i4f6  · 

We apologize for the length of this post, but we felt it was important to share the full details with you.

In early March, a group of Musk-affiliated staffers from the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) arrived at the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the federal agency responsible for protecting workers’ rights and handling union disputes. They claimed their mission was to improve efficiency and cut costs. But what followed raised serious alarms inside the agency and revealed a dangerous abuse of power and access.

Once DOGE engineers were granted access to the NLRB’s systems, internal IT staff quickly realized something was wrong. Normally, any user given access to sensitive government systems is monitored closely. But when IT staff suggested tracking DOGE activity—standard cybersecurity protocol—they were told to back off. Soon after, DOGE installed a virtual system inside the agency’s servers that operated in secret. This system left no logs, no trace of its activity, and was removed without a record of what had been done.

Then, large amounts of data began disappearing from the system. This wasn’t routine data—it included sensitive information on union strategies, ongoing legal cases, corporate secrets, and even personal details of workers and officials. None of it had anything to do with cutting costs or improving efficiency. It simply wasn’t supposed to leave the NLRB under any circumstance.

Almost immediately after DOGE accounts were created, login attempts began—from a Russian IP address. These weren’t random hacks. Whoever it was had the correct usernames and passwords. The timing was so fast it suggested that credentials had either been stolen, leaked, or shared. Security experts later said that if someone wanted to hide their tracks, they wouldn’t make themselves look like they were logging in from Russia. This wasn’t just sloppy—it was bold, calculated, and criminal.

One of the NLRB’s IT staffers documented everything and submitted a formal disclosure to Congress and other oversight bodies. But instead of being protected, he was targeted. A threatening note was taped to his door, revealing private information and overhead drone photos of him walking his dog. The message was clear: stay silent. He didn’t. He went public.

This isn’t just a cybersecurity issue—it’s a coordinated effort to infiltrate government agencies, bypass legal safeguards, and harvest data that can be used for political, corporate, or personal leverage. With Elon Musk directing DOGE, it’s hard not to see the motive: access to union files, employee records, and legal disputes that could benefit his companies and silence critics. This same playbook appears to be unfolding across multiple federal agencies, with DOGE operatives gaining quiet access to sensitive systems and extracting vast amounts of data without oversight.

The truth is, DOGE was never about making government more efficient. It was about taking control of it from the inside. What happened at the NLRB is not an isolated incident—it’s a warning of what happens when billionaires are handed unchecked power inside public institutions.

[paulshultz]

[paulshultz]

[paulshultz]

Everyone needs to watch this full speech.

[paulshultz]

Dumbass Orange shit stain couldn’t even tell you what the Soviet Union was.

[paulshultz]

Thread from Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez on her experience in a hospital in Cuba

[paulshultz]

[paulshultz]

Sedition. Corruption. Treason. Betrayal.

Trump publicly works for our enemies.

[paulshultz]

n an effort to ensure only properly credentialed individuals are allowed to participate in the political franchise, a new law passed Thursday in Indiana requires all women voters to show their husband’s ID before they can be issued a ballot. “As part of our election integrity program, women must arrive at their polling place with a valid Indiana driver’s license, military ID, or U.S. passport belonging to their husband,” said Gov. Eric Holcomb, who added that the law also requires women to present a marriage license confirming they are wedded to a man and a signed letter from a male head of household stating that they have permission to leave their home.  Full Story

[paulshultz]

*smoking

[paulshultz]

[paulshultz]

💩🤦🏾🤦

[paulshultz]

[paulshultz]

Corporate media downplays fascist corruption.