rock-4nd-roll

[rock-4nd-roll]

SURPRISE MORNING PART 2!

AND THUS, THE SAMPLES FOR THE MOTIVATION CARDS HAVE ARRIVEDDDDD!!!!!!!!

Disclaimer : Colours may vary in real life since my camera couldn't capture its actual nice colors :")

ALSO, THESE THINGS WERE HUGE. For ref, the paper size is A5 and only has a front side printed so there's nothing at the back. It's also glossy artcard material. Do you think the material is okay or do we wanna add some shine to it like shimmery card material or matte artcard material?

Both options are pricier and I'm not really sure what the difference is unless I see it in person haha - To me, I think it's nice as a plain card cuz it reminds me of the ones you receive at restaurants when you were a little kid - plain and simple!

Do I also maybe offer sth silly to be signed at the back? Only in short sentences of course - so yuh lemme know :)

Holo badge samples here btw :3

Oh and PLSPLSPLS TELL ME HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT THE DESIGN OF THE CARDS in the comments below / in reblog!!! It'd really help me out, thanks so much in advance 🥹

Tagging the moots and saying hi I'm alive again!! 👋🏻 :

@crabsnpersimmons @nighternex @enduu115 @tamiixchi @crystalmagpie447 @ghosteii @eggcromancer @amarynthian-chronicles @scribbyizhere @pineconecrows @sleepycupcakesmiles @way2gosuperstar @erarousfire @kaprisvn @hexcii @ping-ski @nebuladreamz @flowysgonemad @moriah-dooodles @wyervan @trenchcoat-full-of-snails @coffeensunshine @lurking-loaf @sun-e-chips @haruka-636 @therealandeborg @enjayvee @normal-about-the-dca @modelling-is-painge @overly-dramatic-artist @itsmuffiiee @ihearnocomplaints @morning-sweets

I LOVE U GUYS SO MUCH, IM THROWING FLOWERS AND UR FAV SNACKS AT UR WINDOW PLS PICK THEM UP IMMEDIATELY!!!!! thank ye and have a nice day / night mwah /platonic 🫶🏻🩷

[rock-4nd-roll]

Anyway, I'm working on one drawing, and it's taking longer than expected due to life circumstances, so out of curiosity, I quickly drew the animatronics as real animals. Of course, their size proportions relative to each other don't match reality, but still. I VERY rarely draw animals.

[rock-4nd-roll]

Jack and John

[source]

[rock-4nd-roll]

Moon is right - first impressions are the best impressions to make!

…even if his will be looming above going on about naptime and being an all around gremlin.

<- Previous

[rock-4nd-roll]

trying to make their designs make sense . eclipse doesn't exist to me bc why would scott ruin these two like that.

(click for higher quality i hope) 🤞

[rock-4nd-roll]

Afton family stuff

[rock-4nd-roll]

Just keep swimming

[rock-4nd-roll]

Within the void, darkness lies

Please don’t repost/steal

[rock-4nd-roll]

Henry and William in mascots suits for no reason in front of the pizzeria customers

[rock-4nd-roll]

Happy 5th Birthday to

“The Koala Challenge: Tiktok's Intimate Couple's Trend”

[rock-4nd-roll]

baby's first yaoi

[rock-4nd-roll]

bluntly if the only time you ever mention asexuality is to praise asexuals who are kinky or laud “asexual perverts” or go on about how “asexuals write the best smut” or otherwise only treat asexuals who perform a certain amount of sex as worthwhile or valid then I do not trust you

[rock-4nd-roll]

The sentences "Asexuals can still have sex" and "Aromantics can still date" need to go up on the high shelf for everyone except aces and aros talking about their own experiences. From now on, everyone else has to use the revolutionary new phrase "Asexuals and aromantics can do whatever the fuck they want forever."

Edit: Critical Thinking Questions

Imagine as many different scenarios as you can where a person might tell someone "aros can still date" or "aces can still have sex." Pick two or more of these scenarios to compare. Does the meaning of these phrases change in different contexts? Do you think every speaker of these phrases has the same intent?

Do you think the topic of this post is an "aroace community" issue, or an "asexual community and aromantic community" issue? Do you understand which one of the above is a broader category?

Imagine a scenario in which an aromantic allosexual might be told that "aromantics can still date." In that context, would that phrase be affirming or delegitimizing? Repeat, but imagine a scenario in which an alloromantic asexual might be told that "asexuals can still have sex." In that context, would that phrase be affirming or delegitimizing? If you would like, you may now revisit your answer to Question 2.

Do you think "Asexuals and aromantics can do whatever they want forever" is contradictory to the statements "asexuals can have sex" or "aromantics can date"? If so, then why? If not, then why might OP prefer the phrasing of "do whatever they want forever"? What might "do whatever they want forever" encapsulate that the other statements do not?

Many users are relating this post to fandoms' treatment of asexual and/or aromantic fictional characters. Do you think people's views of real-life a-specs can influence their treatment of a-spec fictional characters? Conversely, do you think their views of a-spec characters can influence their treatment of real a-spec people?

Is the treatment of real a-spec people or of fictional a-spec characters more important? For the category that you considered less important, do you think the treatment of that category is ever relevant or related to how the more important category is treated? (You may reference your answer from Question 5.) Compared to the more important category, how much discussion do you think the less important category deserves? Do you think it may ever be relevant or important to discuss on posts about the category OP sees as more important?

[rock-4nd-roll]

And there’s nothing else to think about in that episode

[rock-4nd-roll]

Minas insta feed (pt 1 )

[rock-4nd-roll]

[rock-4nd-roll]

Has anyone else done this yet