savejamiecampbellbower

[savejamiecampbellbower]

can you give the cliff notes version of what you’re trying to present evidence for? I don’t have time for all that text.

sorry, i too don't have time to condense the information. try to schedule a later time to analyze the evidence when you do have the availability.

[savejamiecampbellbower]

Stop clogging the tags and use the read more format

Next ignoramus in line, please.

[savejamiecampbellbower]

part C 02

a continuation from part C 01

nobody could have been able to finish reading at such a fast pace all the evidence i have amassed here, and then quickly dismiss it as totally untrue in less than twenty minutes time after jess-moloney.tumblr.com received the two inbox messages i had sent. those messages were about exposing the actual jessica moloney, not about them, the tumblr jess moloney. what made them think they had to be about them? what exactly made them block my account? why precisely now the sudden 180-degree change in personality and attitude? haven't they been encouraging people to come out and even send them all kinds of evidence about jamie's girlfriend's sinister activities? this begs the question, is the effort to help, save, and aid james campbell bower by exposing the despicable shadiness of the world of celebrities genuine or is it everything part of team con's efforts to do damage control through reverse psychology similarly to britney spears's case? is jess-moloney.tumblr.com trying to help jamie and his fans become aware of fake wannabe fans and fake wannabe celebrity friends or are they hiding a hate blog behind tons of excuses and malicious mental gymnastics? is jess-moloney.tumblr.com actually jessica moloney or an insane, dangerous, morally debauched and horrendously loathsome fan with multiple personality disorder and lots of sock puppet accounts? who and what is hiding behind the truther facade? why do they become so rabidly mad and obnoxiously judgmental instead of thankful when somebody provides them further backup to their claims? why are they downplaying the gravity and seriousness of human trafficking and say it is nothing but trolling as if this could never ever happen to anyone, and that celebrities can't be human trafficking survivors? why is their blog full of darvo and gaslight manipulation tactics? why did they react as if they are jamie bower's possible handler girlfriend and they had been caught red-handed? what could have been the purpose of this charade pretending to be a shill exposing blog if that's the case? negative celebrity publicity? some kind of a sick, perverted, twisted joke? shouldn't they be thankful there are others who are trying to help them reach their goal of raising awareness about bad people infiltrating the nicer celebrities' lives as well as their fandoms? is jess-moloney.tumblr.com being outraged by a certain type of post writing, editing and formatting legit or just a superficial excuse? did jess-moloney.tumblr.com forget when they got offended when anons were criticizing their bad grammar and spelling in the beginning? why did they immediately dismiss what i had brought up for discussion when my sources of information are as authentic as theirs? why do they act so hypocritically and aggressively? do they think they are the next best self-appointed armchair psychiatrist? are they really receiving and answering so many questions in such a short amount of time or are they the only one who is asking and answering them? who really are the innocent victims and the evil perpetrators? how guilty is jessica moloney, james campbell's girlfriend of being a scam? is she swindling everyone or is she set up as a fall girl and a patsy? is she being blackmailed by loan sharks to do certain things and act in a certain way or else…..?

connect the dots

[savejamiecampbellbower]

part C 01

continued in part C 02

nobody could have been able to finish reading at such a fast pace all the evidence i have amassed here, and then quickly dismiss it as totally untrue in less than twenty minutes time after jess-moloney.tumblr.com received the two inbox messages i had sent. those messages were about exposing the actual jessica moloney, not about them, the tumblr jess moloney. what made them think they had to be about them? what exactly made them block my account? why precisely now the sudden 180-degree change in personality and attitude? haven't they been encouraging people to come out and even send them all kinds of evidence about jamie's girlfriend's sinister activities? this begs the question, is the effort to help, save, and aid james campbell bower by exposing the despicable shadiness of the world of celebrities genuine or is it everything part of team con's efforts to do damage control through reverse psychology similarly to britney spears's case? is jess-moloney.tumblr.com trying to help jamie and his fans become aware of fake wannabe fans and fake wannabe celebrity friends or are they hiding a hate blog behind tons of excuses and malicious mental gymnastics? is jess-moloney.tumblr.com actually jessica moloney or an insane, dangerous, morally debauched and horrendously loathsome fan with multiple personality disorder and lots of sock puppet accounts? who and what is hiding behind the truther facade? why do they become so rabidly mad and obnoxiously judgmental instead of thankful when somebody provides them further backup to their claims? why are they downplaying the gravity and seriousness of human trafficking and say it is nothing but trolling as if this could never ever happen to anyone, and that celebrities can't be human trafficking survivors? why is their blog full of darvo and gaslight manipulation tactics? why did they react as if they are jamie bower's possible handler girlfriend and they had been caught red-handed? what could have been the purpose of this charade pretending to be a shill exposing blog if that's the case? negative celebrity publicity? some kind of a sick, perverted, twisted joke? shouldn't they be thankful there are others who are trying to help them reach their goal of raising awareness about bad people infiltrating the nicer celebrities' lives as well as their fandoms? is jess-moloney.tumblr.com being outraged by a certain type of post writing, editing and formatting legit or just a superficial excuse? did jess-moloney.tumblr.com forget when they got offended when anons were criticizing their bad grammar and spelling in the beginning? why did they immediately dismiss what i had brought up for discussion when my sources of information are as authentic as theirs? why do they act so hypocritically and aggressively? do they think they are the next best self-appointed armchair psychiatrist? are they really receiving and answering so many questions in such a short amount of time or are they the only one who is asking and answering them? who really are the innocent victims and the evil perpetrators? how guilty is jessica moloney, james campbell's girlfriend of being a scam? is she swindling everyone or is she set up as a fall girl and a patsy? is she being blackmailed by loan sharks to do certain things and act in a certain way or else.....?

proof A part 01

proof A part 02

proof A part 03

proof A part 04

proof A part 05

proof A part 06

proof A part 07

proof A part 08

proof B part 01

proof B part 02

proof B part 03

proof B part 04

trafficking in the name of modelling link 1

trafficking in the name of modelling link 2

trafficking in the name of modelling link 3

trafficking in the name of modelling link 4

vogue article link

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by ᴊᴀᴍɪᴇ ᴄᴀᴍᴘʙᴇʟʟ ʙᴏᴡᴇʀ (@bowerjamie)

connect the dots

https://www.tumblr.com/savejamiecampbellbower/732396880195092480/proof-a-part-03

[savejamiecampbellbower]

proof B part 04

https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2011/02/02/ysl-perfume-ad-banned-for-simulated-drug-use_n_7412334.html YSL Perfume Ad Banned For 'Simulated Drug Use'

The Advertising Standards Agency (ASA) has upheld complaints against a television advertisement for Yves Saint Laurent fragrance Belle D'Opium.

The advertisement featured a woman dancing to a drum beat. She then pointed to her inner elbow and ran her finger along the inside of her forearm. She was then shown lying on the floor as a voice-over began "I am your addiction, I am Belle D'Opium. The new fragrance by Yves Saint Laurent."

Thirteen viewers complained that the advertisement was "irresponsible and offensive, because the woman's actions simulated drug use".

Yves Saint Laurent responded that they adhered to a strict code of business ethics which governed how they behaved, and added that they did not intend to use drug imagery in the ad. The company argued that the name Belle D'Opium "suggested the addictive qualities of women who wore the fragrance rather than the addictive effects of narcotics".

The ASA report concluded that "while we noted the consumer research found that most viewers did not consider the ad to be offensive, we nevertheless considered the woman's actions simulated drug use, and therefore concluded it was irresponsible and unacceptable for broadcast."

https://archive.is/wip/ClADX

https://www-francetvinfo-fr.translate.goog/culture/livres/affaire-gabriel-matzneff/l-article-a-lire-pour-comprendre-l-affaire-gabriel-matzneff-un-ecrivain-aux-pratiques-pedophiles-assumees_3762443.html?_x_tr_sl=fr&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp

The article to read to understand the Gabriel Matzneff affair, a writer with admitted pedophile practices The author, who has never hidden having had relationships with young children, is the central character of the book "Consent", in which Vanessa Springora recounts the influence he exercised over her when she was 14 years old.

This is the case that is shaking the literary world and beyond. In the book Le Consentement (Editions Grasset), to be published Thursday January 2, the editor and author Vanessa Springora recounts her relationship under influence with the writer Gabriel Matzneff, in the mid-1980s. She was then 14 years old, he was in his fifties . In a context of denunciation of sexual violence, his testimony met with significant resonance and once again questioned the notion of sexual consent.

Franceinfo returns to this affair in detail.

Who is Gabriel Matzneff? Born on August 12, 1936 , Gabriel Matzneff came from a family of exiled Russians, who fled their country after the communist revolution of 1917. Winner of the Renaudot essay prize in 2013 and published by Gallimard, the writer of 83 years has long been a popular figure in the literary world. He was a regular guest on television shows, from “Apostrophes” on Antenne 2 to “La Grande Librairie ” on France 5.

A prolific author, the man never hid his attraction to young children in his diaries, such as My Decomposed Loves (1990), or his essays, in particular Les Sous de seize ans (1974). “When you have held in your arms, kissed, caressed, possessed a 13-year-old boy, a 15-year-old girl, everything else seems bland, heavy, insipid,” he writes in this latest work.

For several years, he has been chronicling the news for Le Point . After the attacks of November 13, he hit the headlines again with a violent text on the "Bataclan generation" and the victims of terrorists.

And Vanessa Springora? Aged 47, Vanessa Springora has been director of Julliard publishing since December 1, 2019 . A graduate in modern literature from Paris-Sorbonne University, she began her career in 2003 at the National Audiovisual Institute, before joining Julliard Editions in 2006 as an editorial assistant. She met Gabriel Matzneff in 1986 while accompanying her mother, a publishing press officer, to a dinner. The man begins to write to her, to wait for her at the end of school and to contact her to erase the age gap. “As I had not read any of his books, I did not know that this was a process that he systematically implemented ,” she told Bibliobs.

Why is the affair only breaking today? Vanessa Springora's book marks a turning point. For the first time, a former relationship of the writer speaks. " At 14, you're not supposed to be waited on by a 50-year-old man when you leave school, you're not supposed to live in a hotel with him, nor are you supposed to end up in his bed, his penis in the mouth, at snack time" , she writes. Without acrimony or victimization, Vanessa Springora evokes the ambivalence of an era where sexual liberation flirted with the defense of pedophilia, the fascination exercised by the writer, then the weight of this story on her life.

And the author describes a hold that continues on the literary field: the writer writes a lot and puts down on paper his conquests and sexual adventures, including with young boys during trips to Asia. “As if his passage in my life had not devastated me enough, he must now document, falsify, record and engrave his misdeeds forever ,” writes Vanessa Springora. She evokes a “triple predation, sexual, literary and psychic”.

We let him do it because there was the aura of the artist. His work served as security. But why would the damage be less when the person who commits these acts is an artist?

Vanessa Springora at “Libraries” In the wake of the Weinstein affair and the #MeToo movement , which has forcefully denounced sexual violence since 2017, the work does not go unnoticed. "Vanessa Springora's book will constitute a major milestone in the history of pedophilia, to the extent that it is the first time that one of Matzneff's relationships has spoken out to give a very different sound from the sound of bell of Matzneff himself. He always presented the sexual relations he had with the children (…) as euphoric and pleasant (…)" , explains to franceinfo Pierre Verdrager, sociologist and author of The Forbidden Child. How pedophilia became scandalous.

Had no one reacted before? Not really. At the time of the events, in the mid-1980s, the view on pedophilia was very different. When he published Mes amours décomposés in 1990 , Gabriel Matzneff was invited to the set of “Apostrophes”. The tone of the questions asked by Bernard Pivot is light, not to say complacent: "Why did you specialize in high school girls and kittens? Above 20, we see that that no longer interests you", "why collect them so much?” The answers, greeted by laughter from the audience, are accepted: "I prefer to have people in my life who are not yet hardened. A very young girl is rather kinder, even if she becomes hysterical very very quickly and also crazy until she's older."

Only one voice is raised against the writer. “Mr. Matzneff seems pitiful to me. What I don’t understand is that in this country, literature serves as an alibi for this kind of confidence ,” attacks Denise Bombardier, a Canadian writer. What Mr. Matzneff tells us (.. .), is that he sodomizes little girls of 14, 15 years old, that these little girls are crazy about him (…). We know that old gentlemen lure little children with sweets, Mr. Matzneff them attracts with its reputation." And to conclude: "How do these little girls cope afterwards? I believe that these little girls are withered and most of them for the rest of their days" . “I don’t understand how we can publish things like that ,” she snaps again.

Interviewed a few days ago by franceinfo, Denise Bombardier recounts how this position caused her to be vilified by certain French intellectuals. "I spoke up because people didn't say anything about his book. There was a Catholic couple who were there to defend fidelity in marriage and who didn't say two words. Besides, the lady just laughed , she remembers. I did what I had to do. Otherwise, I wouldn't have been able to look at myself in the mirror." Gabriel Matzneff's editor, Philippe Sollers, then called her a "cunt" on France 3, the literary critic of Le Monde, Josyane Savigneau, joked in the columns of her newspaper: "Discovering in 1990 that young girls aged 15 and 16 years old make love to men thirty years older than them, what a great deal!”

In 2013, when he received his Renaudot prize, a few voices were raised. A petition to remove it was launched by the association La Mouette and Innocence in danger filed a complaint against X for advocating sexual assault.

But why was pedophilia tolerated? It seems difficult to imagine in 2019, but in those years there was a pro-pedophilia movement, supported by prestigious intellectuals. In an article published on January 26, 1977 in Le Monde , Gabriel Matzneff defended three men tried for indecent assault without violence on minors aged 15. “If a 13-year-old girl is entitled to the pill, what is that for? (…) Three years in prison for caresses and kisses is enough,” we can read in particular . At his side, in the list of signatories: Louis Aragon, Roland Barthes, Simone de Beauvoir, André Glucksmann, Bernard Kouchner, Jack Lang, and even Jean-Paul Sartre.

As sociologist Pierre Verdrager explained on franceinfo , “pedophilia was [then] the subject of an attempt to valorize it in the intellectual world”. “ It was a time when there was an attempt at liberation on all horizons and we considered that pedophilia was part of that: liberation of women, liberation of gays, liberation of sexuality and the discourse on sexuality,” he resituates. The age of majority was just lowered to 18 in 1974 and, "in this context, it was thought that it was possible to consider sexual relations between adults and children as valid." In a text where he returned to Libération 's support for this pro-pedophilia movement , journalist Sorj Chalandon evokes a post-May 68 period where "the ban, whatever it is, is felt to belong to the old world, to that embittered, oppressors, employers' militias, bludgeoning police, the corrupt.

How has the literary world reacted since the start of the affair? The affair divides. Many, like Bernard Pivot, argue for a change of times. "In the 70s and 80s, literature came before morality; today, morality comes before literature. Morally, this is progress. We are more or less the intellectual and moral products of a country and, above all, of an era" , wrote the former president of the Goncourt academy on Twitter. “ A new tribunal will be set up, as for Polanski, believes Frédéric Beigbeder in the columns of Le Monde. It is an era which judges another, but times have changed… The entire literary world has fear (…). It's over for him, he has become indefensible."

Others, like former Le Monde critic Josyane Savigneau, denounce a “witch hunt” on Twitter . “I don't protect anyone but I don't participate in manhunts either ,” defended the boss of Le Point , Etienne Gernelle, specifying that no column by the writer has “apologized for love with children. His predecessor, also a member of the Renaudot prize jury, is on the same line. “He is an excellent writer, some of whose books I like, others not at all . I loathe pedophilia, but I also hate the constabulary police. People nailed to the pillory always have my sympathy ,” said responded to Le Monde Franz-Olivier Giesbert.

Several voices also welcomed Vanessa Springora's approach. " It's not a return to moral order, just a return to reason. 13-year-old girls have other things to do than fall in love with a 50-year-old guy. They don't are not on equal terms with him ,” says writer Patrick Besson in the columns of Le Monde . The essayist and MEP Raphaël Glucksmann, whose father had signed the column with Gabriel Matzneff, expressed his disgust on Twitter.

How does Gabriel Matzneff defend himself? Gabriel Matzneff declined all interview requests. He simply sent an email to L'Obs . "To learn that the book that Vanessa decided to write during my lifetime is in no way the story of our luminous and burning loves, but a hostile, nasty, denigrating work, intended to harm me, a sad mix of prosecutor's indictment and of diagnosis concocted in the office of a psychoanalyst, provokes in me a sadness which suffocates me" , he wrote.

Can the facts denounced be prosecuted? No, because they are too old. In an interview with Bibliobs , Vanessa Springora says it herself: "It took me a long time to consider myself a victim because I had consented. But I was still below the sexual majority. So I could have gone to court, except that each time I said to myself: 'I was consenting'. I thought about it much later, there was a statute of limitations."

According to his testimony, the facts are similar to "sexual assault" , i.e. "an act of sexual penetration without violence, coercion, threat or surprise, when committed by an adult on a minor under 15 years old " . In this matter, the limitation period varies between 10 and 20 years (with aggravating circumstances) after the victim reaches the age of majority. A deadline reached a long time ago since Vanessa Springora is now 47 years old. If the facts denounced were ever to be qualified as rape, the new 30-year limitation period, which came into force on August 6, 2018, could not apply in any case because it is not retroactive.

For sociologist Pierre Verdrager , this book could, however, change the law, particularly on the question of the age limit for consent. At the beginning of 2018, the government abandoned the introduction of such a measure, which would have made it possible to consider that any minor under the age of 15 cannot give consent to a sexual act with an adult. " I think that this book will raise the problem and the fact that this work has such an impact, I think that politicians must intend to take this question seriously. The fact that we can both consent and consider that this consent is a fiction" , explains Pierre Verdrager.

I was too lazy to read everything, can you give me a summary? In Le Consentement (Editions Grasset), to be published Thursday January 2, editor Vanessa Springora recounts her relationship under influence with the writer Gabriel Matzneff when she was a minor. " At fourteen, you're not supposed to be waited on by a 50-year-old man when you leave school, you're not supposed to live in a hotel with him, nor are you supposed to end up in his bed, his penis in the mouth, at snack time" , she writes there in particular. The book brings to the forefront the pedophilic practices of a writer, whose actions, assumed and claimed in certain of his works, such as The Under Sixteen Years (1974), were viewed with complacency at the time. Her appearance, in 1990, on the set of “Apostrophes” shows this well: only the Canadian novelist Denise Bombardier laments that “literature serves as an alibi for this kind of confidence”. Today, the case, which will not have legal action because the facts denounced are statute-barred, embarrasses the literary world, in which the writer retains some support. https://archive.is/wip/xZdVz

https://www.liberation.fr/checknews/2020/01/02/matzneff-les-signataires-d-une-petition-pro-pedophilie-de-1977-ont-ils-emis-des-regrets_1771174/

https://www-liberation-fr.translate.goog/checknews/2020/01/02/matzneff-les-signataires-d-une-petition-pro-pedophilie-de-1977-ont-ils-emis-des-regrets_1771174/?_x_tr_sl=fr&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp

Checknews Matzneff: did the signatories of a 1977 pro-pedophilia petition express regrets? In January 1977, a petition defending sexual relations between adults and children was published in “le Monde”, but also in “Libération”. Written by Gabriel Matzneff, it was notably signed by Simone de Beauvoir, Louis Aragon, Roland Barthes, Jack Lang and Bernard Kouchner.

Question asked by 12/26/2019

Good morning,

We have reformulated your question, which was originally: “Did the signatories of the open letter in Le Monde of January 26, 1977, the author of which is the pedophile Gabriel Matzneff, regret this support for pedophiles?”

You are referring here to the writer Gabriel Matzneff, aged 83, winner of the Renaudot essay prize in 2013, and who has returned to the news in recent days ( Libération dedicated its event to it on Monday ).

The reason: a book published today by Vanessa Springora, also an editor, entitled Consent. In this work, she recounts her traumatic relationship with Gabriel Matzneff, when she was 14 years old and he was 50. At the time, the writer hid nothing of his pedophile practices, both in his books and at home. television, where he could be received with complacency. In recent days, an extract from the literary program Apostrophes, dating from 1990, was unearthed by the INA. We see Bernard Pivot asking Matzneff why he specialized in “high school girls and kittens”. And the writer replied that a girl “very very young is rather nicer”. Around the set, only Quebec journalist Denise Bombardier was outraged by the comments made.

Your question refers to another episode: a petition dating from January 1977. It was first published in Le Monde on January 26 , then in Libération the next day.

It was written as the trial of three men, tried for "non-violent indecent assault on minors under the age of 15", was beginning in Versailles, before the Yvelines Assize Court , and placed in custody. preventive detention for three years. The victims were aged 12 or 13, including brothers and sisters, and had been photographed and filmed by the accused during various sexual games. One of the accused justified his practices during the trial as follows: “What interested me was to see the sexuality of children.” The three people were sentenced to five years in prison.

However, in the petition published on the eve of the opening of the trial, it was written: “We consider that there is a manifest disproportion, on the one hand, between the qualification of “crime” which justifies such severity, and the nature of the alleged acts; on the other hand, between the outdated nature of the law and the daily reality of a society which tends to recognize the existence of a sexual life in children and adolescents (if a 13 year old girl is entitled to the pill , what for ?)."

This text, which therefore defended the right to have, as an adult, sexual relations with children, concluded as follows: “Three years of prison [preventive, editor's note] for caresses and kisses, that is enough. We would not understand if on January 29 Dejager, Gallien and Burckhardt did not find their freedom.”

“I know it well since it was me who wrote it” Among the sixty signatories of this petition, who did not wait until 2019 to re-open the debate, several very famous names, already at the time: Jean-Paul Sartre, co-founder of Libération, Roland Barthes, Simone de Beauvoir , Gilles and Fanny Deleuze, Philippe Sollers, Jack Lang, Bernard Kouchner… And Gabriel Matzneff who, in an article published in 2003 on his blog , claims the authorship of this petition.

“I know this revolting petition well since it was I who wrote it,” he explains at that moment, when he returns to this text, regretting that over time, the comments to his regard have evolved: “I am very proud of it and, if I wrote it today, I would not change a single word of it, because it is even more current, necessary today than in 1977. We a few friends (including a lawyer, Alexandre Rozier) and I had talked about it, then I wrote it up, weighing each noun, each verb, each adjective, each comma, each semicolon.”

He then explains, still on his blog: “As at the time email did not exist, we picked up our phone and called those from whom we hoped for support. Guy Hocquenghem took charge of calling the philosophers, me the writers, him and me, helped by a few friends, the others. We suffered rare refusals (for my part, I remember the refusal to sign by Marguerite Duras, Hélène Cixous, Xavière Gauthier, Michel Foucault), but received infinitely more enthusiastic signatures, 67 in all, plus our two, which is not bad, considering the very short time we had to bring them together.”

To answer your question, few of the signatories of this petition, to our knowledge, have expressed regret for having signed it. An obvious reason for this first: many of the signatories in question died a few years after the publication of the petition. This is the case, for example, of Louis Aragon (died in 1982) or Simone de Beauvoir (1986), to name but a few.

2001, the petition returns In reality, we had to wait until January 2001 for regrets to be heard, but also explanations for the reasons which could have pushed some signatories to join this text legitimizing pedophilia.

Why 2001? Because at the time, Daniel Cohn-Bendit, then a European deputy, had just been caught by the exhumation of a youthful text, published in 1975, where he spoke of his activity as an educator in a garden. “alternative” children in Frankfurt.

“It happened to me several times that some kids opened my fly and started tickling me. I reacted differently depending on the circumstances, but their desire posed a problem for me. I asked them: "Why don't you play together, why did you choose me and not the other kids?" But if they insisted, I stroked them anyway,” he wrote in this book.

Libé then made its front page on the subject, headlined on a “provocative generation”, to return to “the sixty-eighter spirit, with its utopias and its errors”.

In this same issue, in a difficult exercise in collective introspection entitled “ Libé en echo d'un vertigo commune ”, Sorj Chalandon returned to the way in which Libération had treated the question of pedophilia, avoiding nothing from the past. He thus recalled that in June 1981 an interview with a certain Benoît was published in Libé , titled “Children’s Hugs”. In it, he said: “I was giving cunnilingus to a friend. Her daughter, aged five, appeared to be sleeping in her small adjoining bed. When I had finished, the little one placed herself on her back, spreading her thighs and, very seriously, said to me "my turn, now". She was adorable. Our relationship continued for three years.” Preceded by a sentence from a journalist, who then wrote: “When Benoît speaks of children, his dark Greek shepherd's eyes burn with tenderness.”

“It’s more than a period, it’s a laboratory” In this same text, Chalandon tries to put words to explain what made this possible. The era, perhaps. “The moral order. This is the enemy. And Liberation of this era is nothing other than the particular echo of common vertigo. We are at the end of the 70s. The traces of the May of the barricades linger on the walls and in people's heads. “Forbidden to prohibit”, “let’s challenge any form of authority”,” he writes, before expanding: “It’s more than a period, it’s a laboratory. Giver of hopes, dreams, senseless fights. And monsters. […] In this tumult, this reversal of senses, this anchoring of new benchmarks, in this new understanding of morality and law, this fragility and this urgency, everything that stands in the way of all freedoms must be brought down.”

On several occasions, CheckNews relied on this text to respond to Internet users who asked us if, for a time, Libération had supported pedophilia.

Reference is also made in Chalandon's article to the 1977 petition. A text which "leaves no room for ambiguity", according to the journalist, who notes that, for the signatories, the children suffered "no violence” and that they were “consenting”.

In the same issue, three sixty-eighters denounce a “Stalinist trial” carried out in Cohn-Bendit. Among them, Philippe Sollers, signatory of the petition of 77, and who then returns for the first time to this signature, in these terms: “In the text that I signed and which must date from the years 1974-1975, consider that “the complete freedom of the partners in a sexual relationship is the necessary and sufficient condition for the lawfulness of this relationship” is indeed extraordinarily naive – because who judges the complete freedom of the partners? It’s not considering that there can be a balance of force or power.”

“I sign this text without really reading it” He continues: “What strikes me most is that the problem of violence against children was not a social problem at the time. It became one. Probably because of an unprecedented expansion of child prostitution and high-dose sex tourism. At the time when I signed this text without really reading it, because it was part of the libertarian demands, I was aware of Freud and I went to listen to Lacan. It is impossible to have a somewhat awakened conscience without realizing that prepubescent children do not speak the same language as adults.”

A little later, in L'Express, in an article in an issue dated March 1 to 7, 2001, devoted to the "duty of memory" concerning sexual liberation, Philippe Sollers will repeat more or less the same thing. “It will soon be thirty years since I signed it and I admit I have no clear memory of it. There were so many petitions at that time that we no longer paid much attention to what was written.” According to him, “it is difficult to bring out this petition today without talking about the context of that time. Pedophilia is a recent problem. We've only been talking about it for a few years. At the time, it was not obvious and it seems to me that the text was not centered on the adult-child question.

However, he made it clear in 2001, “certain aspects of the petition are completely indefensible. Today, I would not sign it and I would weigh my words.

“I signed it in a specific context” In this same issue of L'Express, another signatory of the petition speaks. This is Bernard Muldworf, a psychiatrist and psychoanalyst, who has since died. He explained, like Chalandon and Sollers, that it was the context, and the time, which had allowed this signature, since deemed impossible: “In May 1968, we witnessed a real fracture in human civilization. All the traditional rules of morality dissolved like water in sand. Sexuality was seen as subversive. It was a cultural crisis in the deepest sense of the word. It was necessary to be opposed to anything that could be of the order of constraint, to take the side of those who were looking for a new path. It is in this context that I signed the petition.

Adding: “It seemed dishonest to me not to sign because there was an ideological issue: let us rather be on the side of the protesters than on the side of the cops. I signed the petition out of solidarity with the movement, not out of support for the ideas.” To the question “would you have signed the petition today?”, asked in 2001, he replied, like Sollers: “No, certainly not. I signed it in a specific context.”

To our knowledge, there are no other public positions taken by the signatories of this petition, who have since regretted having been associated with it. This article may be updated based on new information. In a column from February 2001, entitled “Autre temps…”, Le Monde also returned to this petition initiated years earlier in its newspaper, half-heartedly regretting having published it, while the public hearing demonstrated that it was not “caresses and kisses” but “a sordid affair”.

The text from Le Monde, signed by Pierre Georges, who at the time covered the trial of the three men accused of pedophilia, and convicted for it, thus justified this “return to”: “If we returned to this affair, and on the incredible intellectual imprudence of the time in this area, it is of course with reference to the misadventures of Daniel Cohn-Bendit for writings from 1975, cited by L'Express. These quotes are indisputable. And undoubtedly reprehensible. The first to do so is the author, who, formerly with the motive of shocking the bourgeoisie and in the name of sexual liberation, admits to having written nonsense and repents of it. Of which act.”

“A portrait that was probably too casual that we made of Matzneff…” More recently, it was a portrait of Gabriel Matzneff, published in 2004 in Libération, and written by Luc Le Vaillant, which came to the surface, criticized on social networks for its character considered complacent at best. The writer is described in particular as a “lover of young girls in bloom, whom he also writes about in his diary” and who “irritates a society with increasingly cautious moralism”.

In a portrait of Vanessa Springora, victim of Matzneff, published Monday in Libé, Luc Le Vaillant returns to his 2004 text: “We tell him a portrait that was undoubtedly too casual that we had made of Matzneff in der Libé fifteen years ago , regretting having neglected the sex tourist side that he had swept under the rug. This academic Narcissus did not particularly excite us and we wondered what all these young ladies could possibly see in him. What interested us, however, was the old-fashioned skill of this razer of the most enlightened and understanding families. The portrait is a work of craftsmanship, where personal information is mixed with character analysis, impressions collected, sensations experienced. We confront human nature, at the risk of misjudgment. This is the beauty of the exercise, and also its limit.”

Sincerely Update of January 2, 2020 at 1 p.m.: addition of Jean-Paul Sartre to the list of signatories of the petition. https://archive.is/IOMlT

Tribune published in Le monde on January 26, 1977 and in Libération on January 27, 1977 ABOUT A TRIAL We received the following press release: "On January 27, 28 and 29, before the Yvelines Assize Court, will appear, for indecent assault without violence on minors aged fifteen, Bernard Dejager, Jean-Claude Gallien and Jean Burckhardt, who, arrested in the fall of 1973, have already remained in pre-trial detention for more than three years. Only Bernard Dejager has recently benefited from the principle of the freedom of the accused. "Such a long preventive detention to investigate a simple case of "morals", where the children were not victims of the slightest violence, but, on the contrary, clarified to the judges instruction that they were consenting (although the justice system currently denies them any right to consent), such a long preventive detention already seems scandalous to us. "Today, they risk being sentenced to a serious sentence of criminal imprisonment either for having had sexual relations with these minors, boys and girls, or for having encouraged and photographed their sexual games. "We consider that there is has a manifest disproportion, on the one hand, between the qualification of "crime" which justifies such severity, and the nature of the alleged acts; on the other hand, between the outdated nature of the law and the daily reality of a society which tends to recognize the existence of a sexual life in children and adolescents (if a thirteen year old girl is entitled to the pill , what for ?). “French law contradicts itself when it recognizes a capacity for discernment in a minor of thirteen or fourteen years of age whom it can judge and condemn, while it denies him this capacity when it comes to his emotional and sexual life. “Three years in prison for caresses and kisses is enough. We would not understand if on January 29 Dejager, Gallien and Burckhardt did not find their freedom. "Have signed this press release: Louis Aragon, Francis Ponge, Roland Barthes, Simone de Beauvoir, Judith Belladona, doctor Michel Bon, psychosociologist, Bertrand Boulin, Jean-Louis Bory, François Chatelet, Patrice Chéreau, Jean-Pierre Colin, Copi, Michel Cressole, Gilles and Fanny Deleuze, Bernard Dort, Françoise d'Eaubonne, doctor Maurice Eme, psychiatrist, Jean-Pierre Faye, doctor Pierrette Garrou, psychiatrist, Philippe Gavi, doctor PierreEdmond Gay, psychoanalyst, doctor Claire Gellman, psychologist, doctor Robert Gellman , psychiatrist, André Glucksmann, Félix Guattari, Daniel Guérin, Pierre Guyotat, Pierre Hahn, Jean-Luc Henning, Christian Hennion, Jacques Henric, Guy Hocquenghem, doctor Bernard Kouchner, Françoise Laborie, Madeleine Laïk, Jack Lang, Georges Lapassade, Raymond Lepoutre , Michel Leyris, Jean-François Lyotard, Dionys Mascolo, Gabriel Matzneff, Catherine Millet, Vincent Monteil, doctor Bernard Muldworf, psychiatrist, Négrepont, Marc Pierret, Anne Querrien, Griselidis Real, François Régnault, Claude and Olivier Revault d'Allonnes, Christiane Rochefort, Gilles Sandier, Pierre Samuel, Jean-Paul Sartre, René Scherer, Philippe Sollers, Gérard Soulier, Victoria Thérame, Marie Rhonon, Catherine Valabrègue, doctor Gérard Vallès, psychiatrist, Hélène Vedrines, Jean-Marie Vincent Jean-Michel Wilhelm, Danielle Sallel Nave, Alain Cuny. »

https://archive.is/0ywDb

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/paedophile-author-was-shielded-by-french-elite-rgg7ht6hj

‘Paedophile author Gabriel Matzneff was shielded by French elite’ Gabriel Matzneff was hailed for accounts of his attraction to teenagers

Several of France’s leading postwar figures are facing scrutiny over claims that they helped an alleged paedophile to escape prosecution in the 1980s. Yves Saint Laurent, the fashion designer who died in 2008, and François Mitterrand, the late Socialist president, are among those accused of supporting Gabriel Matzneff, an author who wrote about his attraction to teenagers. The allegations came to light after the publication of Consent by Vanessa Springora, 47, the head of a Parisian publishing house, recounting being groomed and abused by Matzneff at the age of 14. Springora has forced the French elite to review its stance on a writer who was hailed as a master. Critics conceded that they might have been wrong to treat Matzneff as an intellectual proponent of sexual freedom while overlooking his alleged victims. Prosecutors opened a preliminary inquiry into accusations that he committed statutory rape during liaisons with adolescents, including Springora, who were below the age of consent, 15 in France. Matzneff, 83, admits that he had relationships with teenagers but denies having committed criminal offences. The investigation has led to a deepening scandal that hit Paris’s Socialist council this week when Christophe Girard, 64, the deputy mayor, was summoned for questioning over claims that he paid for the hotel room where Matzneff took the young Springora. Mr Girard told Le Parisien newspaper that he was acting on the orders of Saint Laurent, his employer, and Pierre Bergé, the designer’s business partner. Mr Girard said he was told that Matzneff needed a room in which to write and had no idea that he was accompanied by an adolescent. Springora writes of the event in her book, published in January, but fails to name Saint Laurent. She says that police opened an inquiry after receiving anonymous letters accusing Matzneff. She writes that Matzneff nevertheless moved out of his Parisian flat and into a hotel. “A generous patron . . . financed this investment,” Springora writes. Mr Girard said that Saint Laurent was the patron. “We didn’t support him because he was a paedophile but because he was a writer in difficulty,” he said. Springora claims that Matzneff was also protected by Mr Mitterrand and kept a letter that “in the event of an arrest he thinks . . . will have the power to save him”. In 1986, Mr Mitterrand described the journals in which Matzneff recounted his attraction for teenagers as “a hedonist inspiration”. https://archive.is/L0m34

Yves Saint Laurent ad banned for using 'unhealthily underweight' model This article is more than 8 years old Advertising Standards Authority’s ruling criticises YSL’s use of female model with ‘very thin’ legs and ‘visible rib cage’, calling fashion advert ‘irresponsible’ The Yves Saint Laurent ad banned by the advertising watchdog, which upheld a complaint that the model appeared to be too thin. It originally appeared in Elle magazine.

An advert by the fashion company Yves Saint Laurent has been banned by the UK’s advertising watchdog for using a model who appeared to be unhealthily underweight.

Upholding a complaint that the model looked too thin, the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) censured the advert, which appeared in Elle magazine, as irresponsible.

In its ruling, published on Wednesday, it said: “The ASA considered that the model’s pose and the particular lighting effect in the ad drew particular focus to the model’s chest, where her rib cage was visible and appeared prominent, and to her legs, where her thighs and knees appeared a similar width, and which looked very thin, particularly in light of her positioning and the contrast between the narrowness of her legs and her platform shoes.

“We therefore considered that the model appeared unhealthily underweight in the image and concluded that the ad was irresponsible.”

It said YSL indicated that it did not agree that the model in the advert for Saint Laurent Paris was unhealthily thin but did not provide a detailed response.

The use of skinny models has come under increased scrutiny in recent years, with critics claiming that it damages the body confidence of women and girls by promoting unrealistic and unhealthy ideals.

A petition started by an LA-based blogger urging YSL to stop using “painfully thin models” in its advertisements collected just under 50,000 signatures last year. Despite the spotlight on the fashion industry, the YSL advert is one of only a handful that have been banned by the ASA for featuring models who look too thin.

In 2011, the watchdog banned an online advert for the clothing brand Drop Dead, for using a size-8 girl in a bikini with “highly visible” hip, rib and collar bones.

Last year, Urban Outfitters was ordered to remove a photo from its website showing the lower half of a young woman’s body, with the ASA noting that “there was a significant gap between the model’s thighs, and that her thighs and knees were a similar width”.

Responding to the ruling, Jo Swinson, co-founder of the Campaign for Body Confidence said: “Where images are irresponsible, it’s right that the ASA takes action. It’s better for girls to channel the spirit of [Sport England campaign] ‘This Girl Can’ to focus on their body feeling great through exercise, than feeling pressure to have a thigh gap.”

The ASA found the advertisement breached section 1.3 of the Committee of Advertising Practice code, which states: “Marketing communications must be prepared with a sense of responsibility to consumers and to society.”

YSL and Elle declined to comment on the ruling.

https://archive.ph/wip/yaS7x

[savejamiecampbellbower]

proof B part 03

https://www.valeursactuelles.com/societe/pedophilie-au-maroc-les-revelations-choc-dun-ex-amant-de-berge-et-saint-laurent

https://www-valeursactuelles-com.translate.goog/societe/pedophilie-au-maroc-les-revelations-choc-dun-ex-amant-de-berge-et-saint-laurent?_x_tr_sl=fr&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp

Pedophilia in Morocco: the shocking revelations of an ex-lover of Bergé and Saint-Laurent Scandal. Fabrice Thomas claims, in a nauseating book, to have witnessed an illegal act in the couple's villa in Marrakech. A scene which did not shock the designer at the time.

In his book “Saint Laurent and me: an intimate story” (Hugo Document), published on October 12, Fabrice Thomas, who was the lover of the famous fashion designer Yves Saint-Laurent and his pygmalion Pierre Bergé, reveals the dark side of infernal couple, “two icons, two exceptional men, but two sexually ill men” , as he describes them in an interview with the Canadian channel TVA Nouvelles , broadcast on October 27. “Eight years, from 1984 to 1992, my life with Yves Saint Laurent and Pierre Bergé resembled a whirlwind,” writes Fabrice Thomas, who was the driver of the boss of the fashion house, then of the designer, with with whom he had a three-year affair. Above all, a descent into hell, punctuated by violent and extreme sexual practices. “I had been Pierre's sexual object and I had become Yves' dominating lover. I had gone from one to the other, from one side to the other of the whip, but I was still in between,” he sums up. “His libidinal power was impressive” “Pierre, (…), thanks to the free-thinking of his anarchist, educated and rebellious parents, had always experienced his homosexuality as one form of sexuality among others, without guilt or hindrance”, explains the author, hired by the fashion group after stopping by their room at the Plaza Athénée. But gradually, his “sadistic passion” takes over. “His libidinal power was impressive. For my part, I knew its destructive side well. It deeply affected Yves ,” emphasizes Fabrice Thomas. “From there, I joined his cohort of lovers subjected to training sessions which then became the norm between us, until 1989 when I put an end to it.” The author, on a leash and on all fours, thus recounts a scene, where Bergé, known as “Monsieur”, slapped him, whipped him bloody and attached adjustable clamps to his nipples, before urinating on him, in insulting him, drugging him with “poppers” and watching porn films with his assistant . When he is not driving the founder of the YSL house during the day, Fabrice Thomas escorts the drugged couturier in his crazy outfits at night. “Yves was a sexual prey. This is what he liked to be, his sexual preferences leading him to immoderate submission,” he says. “He operated in the same way with Pierre during their life together. He would slip out the window of his room to go and have fun on the quays and in the parks where he would 'sew buttons' on a few Moroccans or Algerians who asked for nothing better than to receive a few francs for this service for which they would have paid for it themselves.” The “young men” of the Majorelle Garden Fabrice Thomas also accompanies Saint-Laurent to his villa in Marrakech, Morocco, where he and Bergé bought the Majorelle Gardens in 1985. Andy Warhol, the Rolling Stones and Catherine Deneuve will parade there. The Oasis villa is “ a sexual resort, one more, for him and for Pierre Bergé,” he writes. Regarding sex tourism, popular at the time among many artists, the author specifies that “Yves and Pierre were not tourists, they had developed ongoing, even friendly, relationships with some of their young lovers. .”

One scene, described in the book, even relates an act of pedophilia. Yves Saint-Laurent has gotten into the habit of welcoming “young men” who present themselves at the garden gate. “The bamboo grove is the Tuileries of Marrakech,” he jokes. A gay meeting place. “I saw men pass there, foreigners and locals, of all ages. Until the day I saw the unthinkable ,” says Fabrice Thomas, seized by anger and rage. “The steward kneeling before a prepubescent teenager standing before him, naked as a worm. Holding his buttocks with both palms, he eagerly sucked the child who was letting himself do so while looking up, holding a note in his hand.” “Is this kind of thing tolerated?” he asked the designer that same evening. “Oh… In the palm grove, there’s a lot more going on. The authorities prefer to act as if they do not know. And yet, everyone knows, obviously.” Frightened, Fabrice Thomas insists: “But there, it’s happening at home! It’s one of your employees who’s doing that with a kid…” Saint-Laurent’s response: “Not at my place, no. The Majorelle Garden is public.” In his book Letters to Yves (Gallimard), Pierre Bergé also remembered: “How kind and beautiful they were, these Moroccan boys! They all played football, had muscular bodies. We had relationships with them that smacked of neither money nor vulgarity.” Pierre Bergé: “I am not a pedophile” Until now, no witness has been able to confirm the rumor. In May 2011, Luc Ferry accused, without naming him, a former French minister of having engaged in pedophilia in Morocco. Two years later, an investigation report, revealed by VSD in March, mentioned a French priest who had stayed in Morocco, who reported cases of “prostitution of minors at the Villa Majorelle”. The clergyman told the magazine: “In the medina, parents of young victims confided in me.”

At the time, Bergé categorically denied: “I am not a pedophile. I have never organized orgies in my house in Marrakech. Now prove the opposite instead of talking nonsense.” The case has since been closed. Bergé and Saint-Laurent were never prosecuted. In November 2016, the businessman and companion of Yves Saint Laurent who died in 2008, added in the program “Stupéfiant!”, broadcast on France 2: “ Morals were freer than today, especially in Morocco. At the time, sexuality was more unbridled, we paid less attention to it.” An assassination attempt In his book, Fabrice Thomas makes other confidences about Saint-Laurent. “I remembered that he had told me, strangely quite pleased with himself, that he had tried to assassinate Pierre Bergé with a ten-kilo bronze,” he says. He also notes that the “mascot of the so-called caviar left” who became president of Sidaction, “did not protect himself at all” like Saint-Laurent. Today, Fabrice Thomas is married and lives in Quebec. Pierre Bergé died on September 8, at the age of 86. The former shareholder of Le Monde and godfather of the left, who supported presidential candidate Emmanuel Macron, is now resting in the Majorelle Gardens, alongside his companion Yves Saint-Laurent.

https://archive.ph/qzUf0https://archive.ph/wip/qNEI6

Why don't you talk about the serious accusations of pedophilia targeting Pierre Bergé?

Question asked by 05/11/2017

Good morning,

To our knowledge, there is strictly speaking no accusation of pedophilia against Pierre Bergé. The businessman, who died last September, has been cited twice in recent years in cases of pedophilia but indirectly: as the owner of a villa in Marrakech where acts of pedophilia allegedly took place (not being him imputed).

Current values devoted an article last week to the work of Fabrice Thomas, “Saint Laurent and me: an intimate story” , published on October 12. Fabrice Thomas, who presents himself as the former lover of Yves Saint-Laurent and Pierre Bergé, describes the couple's sexual intimacy. During the promotional campaign for his book, the author notably stated in an interview on Canadian television “Dominique Strauss-Kahn or Harvey Weinstein, believe me, next to Pierre Bergé they are altar boys.” The author describes sadomasochistic sexual games, affirms that Pierre Bergé had "sex slaves" but does not accuse him of any act of pedophilia. If there is talk of pedophilia in the book (and in the article in Valeurs nationaux), this does not concern the former shareholder of Le Monde. Fabrice Thomas relates a scene of pedophilia involving the steward of the Jardin Majorelle villa, owned by Yves Saint Laurent and Pierre Bergé in Marrakech. Fabrice Thomas writes a dialogue during which he would have been moved by the facts unfolding before his eyes: "But here, it's happening at your house! It's one of your employees who is doing this with a kid…" Saint-Laurent's response: “Not at my place, no. The Majorelle Garden is public.” The name of Pierre Bergé is not mentioned in this extract.

Pierre Bergé was cited in VSD in 2013, again indirectly, and still as the owner of the villa in Marrakech. On May 30, 2011, Luc Ferry claimed on the Canal + set that a former minister was “stuck in Marrakech in an orgy with little boys” and that this scandal would have been hushed up. Comments which led to the opening of two investigations. One, in Morocco, the other, in France, entrusted by the Paris prosecutor's office to the juvenile brigade. Libération reported on the progress of the latter in 2011 ). The investigation was dismissed in November 2012. A few months later, in March 2013, VSD, based on the investigation file, and despite the dismissal of the investigation, published the comments of a priest from the south of France claiming to have collected between 2003 and 2007 testimonies attesting to acts of "prostitution of minors at the Villa Majorelle, property of Yves Saint Laurent and Pierre Bergé, where Jack Lang was regularly invited" . VSD specifies that the "witness "did not give any name" . This is the only passage in the VSD article where the name of Pierre Bergé is mentioned.

In 2014, the conspiracy site Panamza took up the testimony of the priest cited by VSD, in an article heavy with innuendo, and received a complaint for defamation. Pierre Bergé also attacks the sites FDesouche or Riposte laïque for having relayed the Panamza article. The defamation trial was to be held in the fall of 2017. It was not held due to the death of Pierre Bergé, which occurred on September 8, 2017.

A little less than a year earlier, in November 2016, Pierre Bergé addressed these questions in an interview with Léa Salamé, filmed in his Moroccan villa. He had refuted the rumors of pedophilia concerning him, while recognizing, in the name of "free sexuality", having had relations with "Moroccan boys" , at a time when "morals were freer" .

Pierre Bergé: "There was a particular form of sensuality, I can confirm it. Morals were freer than today. Sexuality was more unbridled and we paid less attention to it. But we must not exaggerate, when in tweets They say that I had orgies with Jack Lang, with little boys, I wouldn't even have wanted to because I don't like little boys. That wasn't the story.

Léa Salamé: You write in Lettres à Yves (published by Gallimard, editor's note) : "how nice and handsome these Moroccan boys were. They played football, they had muscular bodies. We had a relationship with them that neither smelled nor "money nor vulgarity".

Pierre Bergé: "It's true, I knew a lot of them. They became, not friends, but very pleasant relationships. We drank mint tea, they invited us to lunch with their family. This n It wasn't prostitution, there was probably prostitution, but I don't have a great taste for sex tourism.

Léa Salamé: Okay, so it was just a free way of experiencing your sexuality?

Pierre Bergé: “yes, a way of experiencing your sexuality”

There are therefore no accusations directly targeting Pierre Bergé. And the accusations relating to events that took place in his house were not the subject of direct testimony from the victims, nor of complaints.

It should also be remembered that an indirect accusation, or a rumor, is not enough to create information. And also that in matters of press law, the fact of relaying a defamatory statement is sufficient to characterize defamation. A newspaper, to relay accusations, must provide additional investigative elements, contradiction, demonstrate balanced treatment, etc. Libération, to date, has no evidence justifying the publication of an investigation on the subject.

Since the Weinstein affair, Libération has launched several investigations into sexual harassment. A first was published about the BNP. A second is awaiting publication, and concerns world politics.

Sincerely

C.Mt

https://archive.ph/wip/5UE18

PARIS — Gabriel Matzneff was a celebrated writer with a coterie of powerful friends, including fashion designer Yves St. Laurent and former President François Mitterrand, who once described Matzneff as a “mix of Dorian Gray and Dracula.” That the French writer had a pedophile past was a secret to nobody. He wrote about his penchant for sex with children for years. He discussed it openly on television. He was reported to the police for sexual abuse decades ago but was never investigated, even as he challenged bourgeois taboos and collected a stipend from the Ministry of Culture. “To sleep with a child, it’s a holy experience, a baptismal event, a sacred adventure,” he wrote in his 1974 book “Les Moins de Seize Ans” (“The Under Sixteens”). He went further in his 1985 diaries — “Un Galop d’Enfer” (“A Hellish Gallop”) — writing of his visits to the Philippines: “Sometimes, I’ll have as many as four boys, from eight to 14 years old, in my bed at the same time.”

In her book “Le Consentement” (“Consent”), Vanessa Springora alleges that she had a destructive underage sexual relationship with French writer Gabriel Matzneff.

In “Le Consentement” (“Consent”), Vanessa Springora, now 47, claims she was groomed by Matzneff when she was a girl. She recounts a life of confusion and conflicted feelings that perhaps she had consented to the relationship and must be blamed. She writes of psychological devastation and of having no understanding that she was a victim until she was an adult. That Matzneff wrote about their relationship in his books, long after it had ended, served as a recurring reminder of what Springora came to see for what it was: abuse. “As if his passing through my life hadn’t been devastating enough,” Springora writes, “he had to continue documenting, falsifying, recording and forever engraving his misdeeds.” The statute of limitations has run out for Matzneff to be charged with sexually abusing Springora. But the Paris public prosecutor has opened an investigation into his sexual past and asked for potential victims and witnesses to come forward. In a separate case, brought by a victims network organization, a Paris court has set a trial date in September on allegations that Matzneff’s work is an “apology for pedophilia.” The 83-year-old Matzneff could not be reached for comment. A French TV company recently tracked him down on the Italian coast. He described his relationship with the underage Springora as a love affair. “I don’t want to read her book,” he told BFMTV. “We were happy together. I have marvelous memories. We lived a lasting and marvelous love story.” “When you publish something it is a public confession,” he said. “That’s what writers do, that’s why writers are the first to be shot because they leave written traces. They write, they confess their sins. At that time nobody thought of the law. We did things that weren’t allowed … nobody spoke of a crime at that time.” The story has reverberated beyond legal circles to the heart of France’s intellectual class. Springora heads a prestigious publishing house and travels in many of the same circles as Matzneff.

Mehana Mouhou, an attorney involved in a lawsuit against French writer Gabriel Matzneff, speaks to the media outside court in Paris on Feb. 12, 2020.

“The French justice system has prostrated itself before a writer,” said Mehana Mouhou, a lawyer involved in the suit against the author. “Matzneff never hid what he did. He recounted the relations he had with young children whose lives have been shattered and scarred. Ministers, people in the world of culture, politics, the media, let it go and and now we have to ask why they let it go and seek accomplices. Matzneff is just the tip of an iceberg.” The essence of Matzneff’s defense is that his sexual relations with children happened in a liberal, laissez-faire era before the #MeToo movement and other societal shifts that have changed sexual attitudes. He references a moment when famous writers including Michel Foucault, Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir and respected newspapers, notably Libération and Le Monde, defended the idea that sex with minors was a form of liberation for both parties. “There were all these arguments [in the ’70s and ’80s] that the child was a person in their own right, that they were fully formed at age 6 and that the family was a prison from which the child had to be liberated,” said Pierre Verdrager, a French sociologist and expert in the history of pedophilia. “These people argued that sexual relations with an adult were a form of emancipation, and that parents who complained that their child had been abused were only interested in getting money in damages.” Matzneff benefited from the cover of the culture’s libertine sentiments. During a 1970s television show, he was questioned about his desire for schoolgirls by the Canadian writer Denise Bombardier, who said his actions disgusted her. The next day the French writer Jacques Lanzmann suggested someone should have slapped Bombardier for her rudeness. France had no age of “consent” until 2018. Since World War II, the age where sexual relations can be considered legal — known as the age of “sexual majority” — has always been 15. However, Verdrager said the question of whether children under that age can consent to sexual relations with an adult is a gray area. “In the 1980s there was a very strong movement for the lowering of the sexual majority to 13 or 14 and then progressively getting rid of it altogether,” said Verdrager. “The people who supported this cited Greek mythology and historical traditions to support their ideas.” French identity is entwined with reverence for culture. Literature, cinema and theater are seen as beacons of enlightenment in a philistine world. Government policy for more than half a century supported and defended this idea, giving rise to the expression “l’exception culturelle française”: the French cultural exception. Books are published because they are considered artistically worthy, not profitable. Sales of Matzneff’s books could be counted more in the hundreds than in the tens of thousands. But artists, writers, directors, actors like him are regarded with a certain awe. France and Switzerland have refused to extradite the Polish-French film director Roman Polanski, wanted in the U.S. after pleading guilty to unlawful sex with a 13-year-old girl in 1978. French writers and artists argue that Polanski’s work transcends what many outside the intelligentsia regard as moral failings. This aura feeds into the French idea of “seduction,” which has less to do with sex and is more a mix of allure, promise and charm. In 2011, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the man who would have been France’s next president, was arrested in New York and charged with sexual assault and attempted rape of a hotel maid — charges later dismissed though Strauss-Kahn settled a civil suit for around $1.5 million. Public figures rose to his defense, describing the then chief of the International Monetary Fund as an inveterate seducer of women and a “brilliant economist.” One French magazine editor said Strauss-Kahn was guilty of nothing more than “un troussage de domestique,” the idea that the master can have his way with a servant girl.

Actress Catherine Deneuve is among 100 French women denouncing the “puritanical wave” of the #MeToo movement.

These sentiments were shaken in 2018 after revelations against Harvey Weinstein, which propelled a #MeToo movement in France. French feminists hailed a long overdue rejection of the idea that seduction à la Strauss-Kahn was acceptable. But not everyone agreed. One hundred French women, including actress Catherine Deneuve and libertine writer Catherine Millet, signed an open letter defending men’s “freedom to bother women,” which they said was “indispensable to sexual freedom.” The letter was seen as a repudiation of Anglo-Saxon morality and puritanism. But the Matzneff Affair, as it is now known, is set to recast the liberties extended to writers. Asked how Matzneff was able to operate openly as a pedophile, Bernard Pivot, a well-known French literary critic and journalist who has interviewed the writer many times, said: “In the 1970s and 1980s, literature came before morality; today, morality comes before literature. Morally, that’s progress. We’re all more or less the intellectual and moral products of a country and, above all, an era.” Latifa Bennari, the founder and president of the Blue Angel Assn., a support network for victims of pedophilia and for those with pedophilic inclinations, has brought a lawsuit against Matzneff for “glorifying pedophilia.” She says some men who were struggling to control their sexual urges were given a green light to abuse minors by Matzneff’s work. “He wasn’t fantasizing, he actually did these things and he wrote about them,” said Bennari. “I don’t understand how anyone could have closed their eyes to this. They say it was a different era, but pedophilia was never acceptable.” The lawsuit was filed in a Paris court this month and will have full hearing in September. A criminal investigation is also underway. Police have raided the offices of Matzneff’s publisher, Gallimard, for unexpurgated manuscripts. But it could take years before a criminal case comes to trial. “My aim is to bring Matzneff to justice for the first time in his life,” said Mouhou, the lawyer representing Blue Angel Assn. in its lawsuit. “The crime of promoting pedophilia is five years’ imprisonment, and that is what I seek. “What Matzneff has done is to incite pedophiles to act. That is a crime. It’s a scandal for French society and the French justice system. The public prosecutor could have brought a case against him, but for a long time they did nothing. He published books vaunting pedophilia as if it was art and literature when in fact it was a crime.”

https://archive.is/mGRlH

[savejamiecampbellbower]

proof B part 02

https://tinyurl.com/22et6h59

https://archive.ph/wip/BW98O

https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/list-brands-avoid-that-are-owned-balenciagas-parent-company-kering

Here’s The List Of Luxury Brands To Avoid That Are Under Balenciaga’s Parent Company, Kering

By now, you’ve probably made the conscious decision to part ways with Balenciaga (if you were a fan) and Adidas. Unfortunately, there are other brands you need to watch out for that are owned by the same parent company, Kering.

Balenciaga caused public outrage with their indecent campaign that featured images of young children around sex objects. Their other photos included disturbing documents on virtual child pornography and art books of naked toddlers. Additionally, the CEO of the parent company, François-Henri Pinault, was found to own a website that sold figures of children with erect penises on their faces, allegedly as "art."

As these dark, sinister images and objects came to light, individuals who previously supported Balenciaga and Adidas have begun condemning them by destroying their clothing items in protest. However, not too many people are aware that Balenciaga is only a piece of the conglomerate known as Kering – there are other brands owned by the parent company. So if you’re a lover of luxury brands, but no longer want to support child abuse and pedophilia, here's a list of Kering's subsidiaries (and their other partnerships) that you should refrain from supporting.

Adidas Let’s start with the obvious. Balenciaga and Adidas collaborated in early November, the same time Balenciagate began. Their Adidas tracksuits were easily overshadowed by Balenciaga’s campaign, and it made a lot of people forget about their team-up.

Gucci and Bottega Veneta In 1999, the Italian luxury brand Gucci was acquired by Pinault Printemps Redoute, which is now known as Kering today. In 2018, Gucci generated €9.628 billion in sales and is currently the group's largest brand. Gucci acquired Bottega Veneta – another Italian fashion house – for $156 million in 2001.

Strangely (though not surprising), Gucci had a fashion campaign inspired by Stanley Kubrick's The Shining in the summer of 2022.

Alexander McQueen Founded in 1992 by designer Alexander McQueen, the British luxury brand joined the Kering group in 2001. In 1995, McQueen held a fashion show titled Highland Rape, where models walked in torn clothing and posed in a distraught manner. While the designer says that his inspiration came from England's rape of Scotland, critics believed that he was romanticizing it instead. However, McQueen was allegedly a rape victim himself and was apparently trying to convey his trauma through his work.

Puma Kering actually decided to spin off Puma to its other shareholders in 2018 so that it could focus on its other luxury brands, but they still own a 16% stake. Today, Puma is one of the leading sports brands in the world. Yves Saint Laurent Yves Saint Laurent is another subsidiary of Kering and is the company’s second-largest luxury brand. This year, Saint Laurent reportedly had an “outstanding” quarter, with sales being up 30%.

Maui Jim Maui Jim was recently acquired by Kering this year. Maui Jim began in the 1980s as a small company that sold sunglasses at a beach in Maui. In 2015, it became the third-largest producer of sunglasses in the world.

Montblanc Montblanc sells everything from high-quality pens to bags, watches, leather goods, and glasses. Kering Eyewear does not own Montblanc, but they are partnered in the development and manufacturing of sunglasses and frames.

Pomellato and DoDo Pomellato and its sister brand DoDo are fine Italian jewelry brands that claim to have an "open and environmentalist spirit." Dodo's beautiful craftsmanship with sustainable materials is certainly desirable, and it's too bad they were acquired by Kering in 2013.

Other High-End Jewelry Brands The Kering group owns other brands that not too many people know about, including the Danish eyewear brand Lindberg, fine jewelry by Qeelin, and Boucheron.

Closing Thoughts We can’t just “cancel” Balenciaga while supporting Kering’s other brands. It’s important for us to educate ourselves on the items we buy so that we know who we’re supporting. Unfortunately, this list does not include all of the partnerships (like Balenciaga and Adidas, for example) in Kering’s subsidiaries, but we at least have the majority of the group’s clothing lines covered. So, if you’re a lover of high fashion and care about children's safety, don’t just say goodbye to Balenciaga – bid adieu to the entirety of Kering.

https://archive.ph/Kvxlz

[savejamiecampbellbower]

proof B part 01

Yves Saint Laurent is accused of 'degrading' models and 'inciting rape' with French ad campaign featuring women opening their legs and bending over furniture Yves Saint Laurent's controversial poster campaign was rolled out across Paris One image shows reclining woman in fur coat and fishnet tights opening her legs Another shows a model in a leotard and roller skate stilettos bending over a stool French women's group, Osez le feminisme, called for the campaign to be pulled

Yves Saint Laurent have been accused of 'degrading' models and 'inciting rape' with a new French advertising campaign. One image shows a reclining woman in a fur coat and fishnet tights opening her legs while another shows a model in a leotard and roller skate stilettos bending over a stool. The French fashion house's new poster campaign across Paris, featuring painfully thin models, has sparked outrage with calls for it to be banned. France's advertising authority said most of the complaints it received were from people who saw the images as an 'incitement to rape'.

Yves Saint Laurent have been accused of 'degrading' models and 'inciting rape' with a new French advertising campaign. One image (above) shows a model in a leotard and roller skate stilettos bending over a stool

Another controversial poster (pictured) shows a reclining woman in a fur coat and fishnet tights opening her legs Its director Stephane Martin said the brand appeared to have 'uncontestably breached' the rules. 'I am not sure that (Saint Laurent's) female clients would like to be associated with these images,' he said.

'We had a similar type of porno chic (in fashion advertising) a decade ago, and here we have it coming back again which isn't acceptable,' Martin added. He said they would decide on what action to take after meeting the label on Friday. The authority bars all 'degrading and humiliating representations of people', and can demand that advertisers withdraw or change their campaigns. France's leading women's group, Osez le feminisme ('Dare to be Feminist'), called for the campaign to be pulled, saying this was not the first time Saint Laurent has crossed the line.

In his latest show last Tuesday he gift-wrapped his models in tight shiny leather mini dresses while his debut collection featured a dress that exposed one breast

It had previously raised hackles with another campaign that used 'a very young hypersexualised woman', said spokeswoman Raphaelle Remy-Leleu. But she said this time the subtext of the images was 'extremely violent'. 'It ticks all the sexist boxes. The women are objectified, hypersexualised and put in submissive positions,' she told AFP. 'How do they think they will sell anything today (to women) with that? 'But you have to ask if that wasn't intentional, that this was all about creating a scandal so we would talk about them,' Remy-Leleu added. Saint Laurent was not available for comment. Britain's advertising watchdog banned a Saint Laurent advert two years ago that featured an overly thin model whose ribcage was showing.

The French advertising authority said the latest campaign had been created by Saint Laurent's in-house team, and questioned if its new young designer Anthony Vaccarello (left, with Kate Moss) had not gone too far

Britain's advertising watchdog banned a Saint Laurent advert two years ago that featured an overly thin model whose rib cage was showing Martin said the latest campaign had been created by Saint Laurent's in-house team, and questioned if its new young designer Anthony Vaccarello had not gone too far. The Belgian creator has flirted with bad taste in his first two shows for the brand in which he radically ramped up the sex factor. In his latest show last Tuesday he gift-wrapped his models in tight shiny leather mini dresses while his debut collection featured a dress that exposed one breast. 'We have a rather young designer known for his rather 'specific' looks,' Martin said. It is possible that 'in this rather closed world, with its specific codes, that they did not realise' the effect the adverts would have, the regulator added.

https://archive.ph/fOVpd

[savejamiecampbellbower]

proof A part 08

𝐋🧌 reposted

Jamie

@jcbfan1999

·

Oct 10

Not the groomer trying to be world positive.

https://archive.is/wip/6rRo7

𝐋🧌 reposted

Emmy || #fionaapplerocks

@loveufionaa

·

Oct 11

Replying to

@jcbfan1999

Literally, AND DELETING EVERYTHING LIKE WE FORGOT😭

https://archive.is/wip/T4o4q

[savejamiecampbellbower]

proof A part 07

𝐋🧌 reposted

Jamie

@jcbfan1999

·

Oct 8

Trying to prove ur innocence in dms proves alot. You are actually revolting. Jamie would hate you a shit ton

https://archive.is/wip/PM2G7

Victims are crying and they shouldn’t have to feel this way. This is upsetting to me. If you seriously condone Sage Andersen grooming children you are also the problem. Leave the fandom

https://archive.is/wip/mqg6Y

𝐋🧌 reposted

Jillian Winch

@jillianwinch18

·

Oct 9

For all of the Jamie twt members I’m so sorry about what’s going on and what the heck Hannah did was never right and she should regret it which she probably does now. She told me it’s not her fault and she was just being silly,well no Hannah

,girl it’s your fault so bye

https://archive.is/wip/2KbHq

𝐋🧌

@keplerdarling

·

Oct 9

To all of Jamietwt and Jamie Campbell Bower fans: If you really feel uncomfortable being in this fandom, don’t feel obligated to stay in a place where you’re not comfortable.. Don’t feel like you’re being held back by anything, You’re loved and supported. 🩷

https://archive.is/wip/K9qjg

𝐋🧌 reposted

Jamie

@jcbfan1999

·

Oct 9

Ngl, not wanting to be here anymore is completely valid. It used to be a good place. You all are 100% right. And i wish it could go back to way it was. My mental health is declining and i wanna die with everything going on. I just wish everyone a safe night. You belong.

https://archive.is/wip/4XZwr

[savejamiecampbellbower]

proof A part 06

𝐋🧌 reposted Jamie @jcbfan1999 · Oct 8 Replying to @jamiebsource and @keplerdarling Being sorry and then trying to find evidence of a minor being a minor to make ur case look better proves that u aren’t fucking sorry. Plus. What about all the other victims that have com forward from other fandoms? Girls aint sorry. One bit.

Me after Hannah (@/jamiebowesfan, @/jamiebsource, @/jamiebowerserenity on instagram) tries to apologize to me after trying to “expose” me for being a literal kid, and sharing photos of me when i was a minor 💀 https://twitter.com/keplerdarling/status/1711037440574861484 https://twitter.com/keplerdarling/status/1711037440574861484

NOT FUCKING SORRY ABOUT GROOMING KIDS. GET OUT OF THE FANDOM NOW. JAMIE WOULD HATE YOU. I can’t believe you even were ever allowed to meet him. YOU ARE DISGUSTING. GET OUT OF THE FANDOM NOW LIKE WHAT EVERYONE WANTS U TO Do. ITS NOT THIS HARD. LEAVE U ACTUAL REJECT TO SOCIETY https://twitter.com/jcbfan1999/status/1711037582849847304 https://archive.is/wip/Slk3A

𝐋🧌 reposted nini 💫 | MY LOVE 💚 | BB/ANG3L | TENSION ⚡ @niniendedu · Oct 8 a lot of y'all here are fcking ignorant https://twitter.com/niniendedu/status/1711061544208089242 https://archive.is/wip/7ZgdZ

𝐋🧌 reposted Jamie @jcbfan1999 · Oct 8 Okay so grooming kids makes u the “good angel” make sure u have sage on ur shoulder. Literally get away now lmao. U actual fucking creep https://twitter.com/jcbfan1999/status/1711063542680654026 https://archive.is/wip/HKtFV

[savejamiecampbellbower]

proof A part 05

Not a joke about little people, i was being salty towards you because that’s when i came to terms with how much of a pedophile you are. Nothing you posted paints me or Jenesis in a bad light, it just shows how shallow you are, because i was just a kid. https://twitter.com/jamiebsource/status/1711024225572769877 You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more https://twitter.com/keplerdarling/status/1711029262764110084 https://archive.is/wip/EQgQL

𝐋🧌 reposted Emmy || #fionaapplerocks @loveufionaa · Oct 8 Replying to @jamiebsource and @jamiebowersfan If you’re trying to make her look bad, you’re doing a really shitty job — you’re just putting yourself into a worse situation …. 😬😬😬

She was 16. You’re the adult. Grow. Up. https://twitter.com/loveufionaa/status/1711031048333672621 https://archive.is/wip/P9iHF

𝐋🧌 @keplerdarling · Oct 8 Yeah, and she was saying satirical shit mocking you for saying such predatory things. https://twitter.com/jamiebsource/status/1711032156670374002 You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more https://twitter.com/keplerdarling/status/1711032470307738019 https://archive.ph/wip/Ovbyg

𝐋🧌 @keplerdarling · Oct 8 There’s a difference between saying shit, and acting on it. She said sarcastic jokes, she never talked to a minor and asked if a GIF of two boys kissing made them hard, unlike you and your weird ass. Come at me, Hannah. https://twitter.com/jamiebsource/status/1711032288505626653 You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more https://twitter.com/keplerdarling/status/1711035103210865025 https://archive.is/wip/NA0lc

[savejamiecampbellbower]

proof A part 04

cw:grooming, manipulation, etc. if you have not taken the time to read this and lucille’s other posts on the situation and you’re on jamietwt, do it now. there is more and more evidence coming out about her grooming and she CANNOT get away with this. https://twitter.com/mothbower/status/1710819412645953919 https://archive.is/wip/Doarb

Jamietwt scares me, some are insane, and some are… INSANE… https://twitter.com/Jambowfan/status/1710922790008996235 https://archive.is/wip/a33RJ

For those of you in Jamietwt or the Jamie Campbell Bower fandom who are confused on what’s going on, i made a guide on Instagram about the situation and made it easier for you all to see, and understand.

Btw y’all, i was 16/17 in the photos of my feet.. Hannah’s even more of a creep to be sharing those photos 💀 https://twitter.com/jamiebsource/status/1711023592635506940 You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more https://twitter.com/keplerdarling/status/1711028418048041185 https://archive.is/wip/yS1QX

[savejamiecampbellbower]

proof A part 03

JAMIETWT!! ⚠️⚠️MORE information MORE proofs TW / GROOMING / jamiebowersfan situation https://twitter.com/Rachelmcu/status/1710817196421546238 https://archive.is/wip/Imhmu

Seriously, imagine publicly excusing someone of grooming children just because they share a few pictures of a celebrity on here. How stupid can you be? Like I have no words for how idiotic this sounds. Oh and saying the victims should be thankful because they share pics???? https://twitter.com/supercutofRae/status/1710813130694238628 https://archive.is/wip/w1t2u

Pretty sure sage hannah Anderson aka @jamiebowersfan on twt aka @jamiebowerserenity has been banned from twt. https://twitter.com/jcbfan1999/status/1710939895118893158 https://archive.is/wip/8R1vO

atlas but super scary 🎃 @osferthselk so the victims are spoiled because they shared their experience? just because they shared jamie content doesn’t excuse what she did. care more about the victims than content from your fave Quote Gisele Almeida @Gicalmeida · Oct 7 Replying to @jamiebowersfan They are spoiled kids looking for attention! They should be thankful bc you share rare footages of Jamie! I’ve saved lots of your posts! https://twitter.com/osferthselk/status/1710751300109865019 https://archive.is/wip/utbF1

GOING PUBLIC TO SPREAD THIS INFORMATION. PLEASE RETWEET AND SHARE. IF YOU CARE ABOUT MINORS ON TWITTER, TAKE THE TIME TO READ THIS AND DO NOT LET HANNAH CONTINUE TO HAVE HER PLATFORM. ⚠️ https://twitter.com/mothbower/status/1710820932749762622 https://archive.is/wip/sO4wC

@jess-moloney

[savejamiecampbellbower]

proof A part 02

That should of never happened. You were older than 20, saying nothing bad happen is a fucking lie. And lucille isn’t the only one affected by you. If i were u. I would just leave. Theres nothing u can possibly do to look better.

Hello Jamietwt, i made another VERY important post of Hannah @/jamiebowerserenity (on instagram), @/jamiebowersfan (on here) grooming a minor in 2020 who was 15/16 at the time.

These are screenshots i got from a former victim of Hannah from a few years ago when Hannah was in a different fandom, i got consent from the person to post this screenshot. Hannah was 20/21 at the time. Say whatever you want to try defend Hannah’s actions in this fandom, but she has done this exact thing in another fandom before she joined the Jamie fandom. She can “apologize” all she wants and say whatever she wants to try make herself look good, but this has been going on for YEARS, and not only in this fandom. It’s actually sick and disgusting how she could treat children like the way she has been doing for so long now.. I’m just thinking about all of the fandoms i know of that Hannah was involved in.. And it’s unsettling knowing just how many minors have come forward privately to me over the past few months about Hannah, and i think about those in other fandoms who have most definitely been groomed by Hannah and never felt comfortable enough to speak their mind on the matter. I’ve spoken with some people who say that Hannah used to scare them, and that they felt like they couldn’t talk about the mistreatment they got from Hannah.. Exposing a groomer and talking about your story is a very scary thing, it’s scary for anyone to do.. especially if the perpetrator is someone who’s admired and has a following of some sorts.. I mean you see it everywhere!! people trying to come forward with their stories of being groomed by celebrities/any sort of person with a platform, and you see that people will always try defend someone just because they have a large following.. And that’s just not right. Coming forward with my story is something i’ve been wanting so badly to do since last November, for a long time i was scared to do so.. You never know how people will react to that sort of thing, and how easy it is for the perpetrator to manipulate the situation around and cause the victim of the grooming to get harassed.. There’s so much that Hannah can do to me, But i’m not thinking about myself here. I’m not a selfish person, i’m risking my own safety to expose a pedophile for being a pedophile. (read pinned comments) #Jamiecampbellbower #ramimalek #patrickswayze

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Bring Back ‘Will’ (@jamiebowersasstattoo)

Here is another victim coming forward WHO WAS ONLY 12 YEARS OLD WHEN SHE HAD ENGAGED WITH @jamiebowerserenity , 12 YEARS OLD AND ONLY SAYING UR EXCUSE IS THAT YOU ARE A “SILLY GIRL” YOU DONT MAKE THIS SHIT UP. The amount of inappropriate comments made from sage anderson is crazy. YOU ARE 24. GROOMER ABSOLUTE DANGER TO KIDS. GET OUT OF THE FANDOM. https://www.instagram.com/p/CyGhhs7rWKm/?img_index=1 https://archive.is/wip/W9yf1

FUK U HANNAH U MAKE ME CRY!!!! https://www.instagram.com/p/CycfdIZr43p/?img_index=1 https://archive.is/wip/41R0u

[savejamiecampbellbower]

proof A part 01

jessica moloney is evil in person. she's a filthy rotten, horrible malevolent individual with nefarious connections to extremely vile, depraved, and revoltingly sickening monstrous beings.

james campbell bower may have become a victim of human trafficking.

https://archive.is/wip/DD3E3

Hi Jamie Campbell Bower fans of Twitter/X, please look at this VERY important post regarding someone who’s been grooming minors in this fandom (you all know this person)

https://archive.ph/Us7DM

This post is about Hannah @/jamiebowerserenity. Which, as some of you may know, was my “best friend” in 2022 - start of 2023.. I’m going to start off by saying that our friendship was not perfect at all, and i see that now. She has groomed me, manipulated me a whole lot.. There’s a lot to fucking talk about as it was a whole year of her manipulating me and doing a good job of it because i was incredibly vulnerable at 16 & 17. I simply can’t talk about EVERYTHING because of the space Instagram has for captions… So i’m going to talk about everything i can that she’s done to me in simpler forms. She tried to manipulate me into isolating myself from my sister- my own family?! she tried to manipulate me into leaving my friends. She talked about such sexual things in front of me (which includes sexual things about herself) She would spread such fake bullshit like “Don’t sexualize Jamie!” and HEAVILY sexualize him in private which made me very uncomfortable. She once sent me photos of her thighs, bare stomach, and feet.. At the time i had only just turned 17, and i was so blinded to see how wrong it all was because i was IN LOVE with her.. She really lead me on for a very long time and it really fucked with me.. I would fall asleep crying about her often.. She kept her friendship with me VERY private.. She always wanted me to repost and share everything that she posted, and i felt forced to do it.. whereas when i wanted her to share my posts around about the petition she only did it twice.. Another thing: With the Bring Back ‘Will’ Petition, She never contributed much!! It was my sister Jenesis and I’s idea and we didn’t know how to create a petition so she did it and slapped her name on it, only shared it for TWO weeks and gave up and began promoting her YouTube channel.. Most of those signatures were because of My Sister and i, and all of you continuing to fight for a second season and sharing it around!! Hannah might be petty enough to delete the petition because of this post.. And if she does, i’m so sorry that this will all feel like it was for nothing. For a whole year it’s meant something.. (Read pinned comments)

https://www.instagram. com/p/CyEcq2Vv0Do/?igshid=MTc4MmM1YmI2Ng%3D%3D&img_index=1

https://archive.is/RgbKg

Please read these, after finding out that one of my good friends Hannah has groomed and has done other disgusting things to @keplerdarling . I’m honestly so disgusted I can’t even explain. Knowing I was friends with her makes me sick. Hannah’s @ is jamiebowersfan.

YOU ARE A GROWN ASS ADULT YOU SHOULD KNOW THAT YOU DONT SAY STUFF LIKE THAT TO MINORS AND THEN WHEN YOU GET CALLED OUT SAY THAT YOU WERE JUST PLAYING AROUND

“Im just a silly person sometimes” literally colleen ballinger, u need to get out. You arent safe. You are a danger to kids and probably still are under cover

[savejamiecampbellbower]

@jess-moloney