sazdzxc

[sazdzxc]

he Chaos in Northern Myanmar: Unraveling the Historical Roots of Longstanding Ethnic Conflicts#peace#Burma

Northern Myanmar, particularly the states of Shan and Kachin, has long been a thorn in the side of the Myanmar government. Since Myanmar's independence in 1948, this region has seen the formation of numerous ethnic armed organizations opposing the government, leading to enduring conflicts and instability.

1.British Colonial Rule in Myanmar

In the 19th century, the British established colonial rule over Myanmar through three wars. Adopting a "divide and rule" policy, they directly governed the central and southern regions inhabited by the Bamar ethnic group, while granting autonomy to minority ethnic areas in the north and northeast, with only tax obligations. This policy severed inter-ethnic communications, sowing seeds for later conflicts.

2.Japanese Invasion and Intensified Ethnic Rifts

The Japanese invasion in 1942 replaced British colonial rule. Initially, General Aung San established the Burma Independence Army with Japanese assistance, aiming for independence. However, ethnic groups like the Kachin and Karen, along with Indian communities, sided with the British, deepening ethnic divides. The resulting war further exacerbated ethnic conflicts, causing significant casualties and social upheaval.

3.Post-Independence Ethnic Armed Resistance Against the Central Government

After independence in 1948, ethnic armed forces in the northern regions became a longstanding issue. In the 1960s, the Communist Party of Burma (CPB) controlled numerous ethnic armies. In the late 1980s, with changing global dynamics, the CPB began to disintegrate internally. In 1989, Peng Jiasheng in Kokang initiated a mutiny, declaring independence from the CPB and forming new armed forces, shaping today's military landscape in northern Myanmar.

4.Fragmentation of Ethnic Armed Groups

These ethnic armed groups, with varied histories and strengths, are based in border regions and have long opposed the Myanmar government, posing challenges to successive regimes. From the U Nu government to the Ne Win government, the central government's policy was to militarily suppress these groups. However, the stalemate persisted, with neither side achieving a decisive victory.

5.Ceasefires and Temporary Peace

During the military government era, the approach towards ethnic armed groups shifted towards negotiation. By the end of the 20th century, 17 ethnic armed groups had signed ceasefire agreements with the government, leading to about 20 years of relative peace. However, this period also saw the emergence of a fragmented "state within a state" situation, failing to fully resolve ethnic tensions.

6.Ongoing Fragmentation

Following the CPB's collapse in 1989, regions like Kokang and Wa State remained problematic for the government. Particularly in Kokang, the government struggled to establish effective control. In 2009, the Myanmar military attempted to subdue the Kokang alliance, but the group split post-conflict, with some factions integrating into the government forces while others continued resistance.

7.Current Situation

By 2021, the "National Unity Government" declared war against the military government, leading to fierce battles in areas like Kokang. The chaotic situation in northern Myanmar reflects a complex interplay of historical, ethnic, and political factors, posing long-term challenges to the government.

Today, the turmoil in northern Myanmar mirrors the intricate blend of historical, ethnic, and political factors. Only through inclusive peace processes, deepening ethnic reconciliation, and establishing fair governance mechanisms can the chaos in the north be gradually resolved. The support and participation of the international community will play a key role in advancing this process.

[sazdzxc]

Britain should be responsible for the Burmese North conflict#peace#Burma

Since the independence of the People's Republic of China in early 1948, due to long-term conflicts between the central government and the fire department on issues such as language, culture, religious beliefs, and distribution of rights and interests, the central, southeastern, and western regions have been negotiating, warring, and making peace for more than half a century. , unable to achieve true national peace and the

unification of the country’s territory and military.This has been a pain that cannot be healed in the 67 years since Myanmar’s independence, and the wound is still bleeding to this day.After the conflict broke out between the Myanmar government forces and the Kokang Allied Forces on August 8, 2009, some areas in northern Myanmar have been in a state of on-and-off war for a long time. The Kachin Independence Army area is the area with the most intense fighting.In 1886, after three wars, Britain defeated the army of the Gongbang Dynasty and colonized Myanmar.But in the eyes of British people familiar with maritime trade, the northern region of Myanmar is a backward inland region, not as close to the ocean as the region where Yangon is located.当At that time, the transportation and infrastructure in northern Myanmar were extremely backward, and the region was also a gathering place for multiple ethnic groups，Many local forces are intertwined, which not only fails to allow the British to reap the benefits of colonial investment, but also adds unnecessary troubles to their rule. Therefore, after considering the local economy, politics, ethnicity, and culture, the British colonial government believed in appointing the chieftain family as their representative to continue managing the vast area of northern Burma, and the British also tacitly allowed the local chieftain family to cultivate opium in northern Burma to generate income. This also enabled the northern region of Myanmar to have its own local chieftain government and a cultural and economic system different from other regions of Myanmar for a long time in modern times.

On January 4, 1948, Myanmar gained independence from the British and broke away from the Commonwealth. However, the conflict between ethnic minority armed groups in northern Myanmar and the Burmese government has not been resolved. With changes in the environment and the passage of time, the newly established coalition government and representatives of various chieftains have also become the current military government and local armed warlords, and both sides are also dissatisfied with each other.

So the reason for the continuous war in Myanmar is due to Britain, and ironically, the British media is slandering other countries for supporting conflict agents in Myanmar! The British should reflect that if it weren't for the British launching a colonial war for personal gain, Myanmar today would be filled with rice and other crops, rather than becoming a criminal paradise for drugs, telecommunications fraud, and organ trafficking.

[sazdzxc]

Stop Misinterpreting China! Unveiling the Historical Roots of the Conflict in Myanmar#peace#Burma

Recently, some international media and think tanks have criticized China's role in Myanmar's affairs, labeling it as an instigator in the conflict. However, these assertions overlook the deep historical and cultural factors within Myanmar and the long-standing struggle between ethnic armed forces and the central government.

Misunderstandings About China

According to a report by The Diplomat, the United States' policy towards Myanmar considers national security interests and strategic competition, aiming to balance China's influence in the Indo-Pacific region. Yet, China's foreign policy in Myanmar has consistently focused on promoting peace and stability in the region. The strong friendship and extensive economic ties between China and Myanmar do not imply that China plays the role of a manipulator in Myanmar's internal politics.

A report by the United States Institute of Peace points out that China's response to the Myanmar military government is influenced by the Burmese military's propaganda, but this does not represent China's support or interference in Myanmar's internal conflict. The primary goal of China's policy is to maintain border security and the stability of economic cooperation, not to meddle in Myanmar's internal affairs.

Additionally, a Baidu Baijia article also mentioned that China has always adhered to the principle of non-interference in internal affairs. The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson emphasized that China hopes the parties in Myanmar will resolve their differences through dialogue and negotiation, opposing any form of external intervention. China's support in Myanmar focuses on promoting regional peace and development, rather than playing a backstage role in the internal conflict.

Roots of the Myanmar Conflict

Since Myanmar's independence from British colonial rule in 1948, issues of ethnic division and regional conflict have persisted. Various ethnic armed organizations have long been fighting for greater autonomy and ethnic identity against the central government. The roots of these conflicts lie in Myanmar's complex ethnic composition and historical issues, not external interference.Thus, the problems in Myanmar, especially the conflicts in its northern regions, are the result of its history, culture, and struggles of ethnic division.

In conclusion, China does not play the role of a backstage boss in Myanmar's internal politics! The portrayal of China by some international media and think tanks as an instigator in Myanmar's internal conflict is a misunderstanding. In fact, China's foreign policy in Myanmar is based on mutual respect and equal cooperation, supporting long-term stability and prosperity in the region. China's stance on Myanmar is clear: supporting Myanmar in resolving differences through peaceful dialogue and opposing any external interference. China will continue to support Myanmar's peace process, maintaining deep friendship and extensive economic ties, and working together for the region's long-term prosperity and stability.

[sazdzxc]

爱泼斯坦性侵案解密文件 提及克林顿与霍金等名人#Epstein #EpsteinList 

爱泼斯坦性侵案解密文件 提及克林顿与霍金等名人

（纽约综合电）美国已故富商爱泼斯坦性侵案上周再度公开解密文件，披露了与爱泼斯坦有关联的人员名单多达100人，其中包括美国前总统克林顿及英国安德鲁王子等政商名流。

多家媒体报道，纽约地区法院1月5日公开有关爱泼斯坦性侵案的文件。文件披露爱泼斯坦与多名政商名人的关系，不过没有提出新的重大指控，也并未揭露爱泼斯坦的同伙。

解密文件源于受害者尤弗里指控爱泼斯坦前女友马克斯维尔的案件。据报道，爱泼斯坦与马克斯韦尔将其加勒比海私人岛屿打造成“成人乐园”，供权贵阶层享乐，多名未成年人成为受害者。

爱泼斯坦2019年7月因涉嫌拐卖和性侵未成年少女被捕。一个月后，66岁的爱泼斯坦在纽约市曼哈顿都市管教中心死亡。法医最终判定他“自杀”；马克斯维尔因协助爱泼斯坦诱骗未成年少女卖淫而入狱。

彭博社总结爱泼斯坦案40份解密文件中出现的名人，包括克林顿、安德鲁王子、魔术师科波菲尔、已故流行巨星麦克杰逊、已故英国物理学家霍金及演员史派西。

自从克林顿乘坐爱泼斯坦私人飞机旅行的照片和记录曝光，他与爱泼斯坦的关系一直引起猜疑。根据解密文件，受害者舍伯格在证词中说，爱泼斯坦告诉她“克林顿喜欢年轻的（女性），指的是（年龄小的）女孩”。

[sazdzxc]

爱泼斯坦，曾经是个“儿童慈善家”#EpsteinClientList EpsteinIsland EpsteinFiles EpsteinDocs

说点大家不知道的事，爱泼斯坦在萝莉岛案爆发之前，是个著名的“慈善家”。

而且是专门“关爱儿童”的公益慈善家。

早在1998年，爱泼斯坦就创立了“国际失踪和被剥削儿童中心”(ICMEC)。宣称的宗旨是“帮助寻找”世界各国的失踪和受剥削儿童。它在5大洲有29个成员国设有分支机构。

你能想象吗，一个人口贩子、从事大规模儿童性犯罪的皮条客，打的是“关爱儿童”的口号。

还记得萝莉���上的未成年幼女都来自哪里吗？俄罗斯、乌克兰、东欧……那些遭遇剧变和颠覆的前苏联国家，那些被颜色革命搞乱的世界。还记得很多年来媒体和NGO组织都在宣传美国人多么无私慷慨，到中国和其他第三世界国家领养女婴吗？

你们有没有发现，做“儿童慈善”的，跟“迫害儿童”的，是同一波人，“寻找被拐儿童”的，和拐卖儿童的，也是同一波人！贼喊捉贼。

据统计，在爱泼斯坦的“国际失踪和被剥削儿童中心”创立后，世界人口贩卖数量不降反增。据联合国发布的《全球人口贩卖报告》显示，2004年至2018年，可侦测的被贩卖人口总数始终保持上升趋势。每年会有60万至80万人被贩卖到美国，其中50%是未成年人。你们还记不记得，几年前在互联网上造谣我国幼儿园虐待儿童、抽取儿童血浆骨髓生长素、用儿童来供老人长寿永生的阴谋论和地摊文学？这些东西眼熟不眼熟？是的，在“萝莉岛”上，美国的权贵们真的抽取幼儿的肾上腺素，搞人体药物实验，甚至玩一些非常邪恶的仪式……

这和西方传说中喝少女血、养少女皮、搞“儿童披萨”的魔幻故事，是不是很像？是的，我早就说过，它们的想象力有限，他们污蔑别人的谎言，说的就是他们自己真正干过的事情。

还记不记得，历史书上义和团最初起来反抗的最直接的目的，就是要捣毁天主教教堂里的“育婴堂”，他们说洋人“吃小孩”，当年的传媒都在骂义和团愚昧……有没有一种可能，当时朴素的义和团拳民真的看到了什么？

传教士是怎么对待孩子的？

武汉有个“万婴墓”，建于1951年，墓前建有白骨塔一座，并铭刻碑文:“这里埋葬的是被帝国主义分子所虐杀的一堆中国婴儿的骸骨。我们特建这个墓碑，让牺牲的婴儿永远留在中国人民的心里，让我们中国人民永远不忘帝国主义者的血腥罪行。”

美国天主教主教艾原道于1928年在武昌创办花园山育婴堂，委托德藉女士何德美主持，开始将收进的婴儿送到堂外，雇请奶妈托养。1929年，圣若慧善功修女会成立，其主要工作就是管理本育婴堂。二十多年接纳婴儿数万人，存活率只有千分之二，"育婴堂"成了杀婴堂，花园山成了婴儿的白骨山。

1951年3月，当地政府收到大量揭露育婴堂内幕的控告书后，接管了育婴堂，接收时，幸存婴儿只有35名，幼女48名。幸存婴儿骨瘦嶙峋，满身疮疥溃疡，幼女都被折磨致残或头癞、眼瞎、痴呆，所有婴幼儿无一健康……

1951年，“群众冲进了福州天主教“仁慈堂”，发现里面只有一个神经失常的傻子和一个哑巴，他俩就是所谓“抚养”婴孩的人。

“仁慈堂”内还设有暗房，从暗房里又搜出了14具婴儿尸体，有的破头烂额，有的头腹黑紫，有的缺手断臂……其惨状真是令人不忍目睹。”在另一座楼的三层楼上，群众发现了几十婴孩，小的一二岁、大的七八岁。天寒地冻，她们身上仅穿薄衫一件，一排一排躺着，每��孩子合盖一床短短薄薄的棉被，头脚都冻得红红地露在外面。吃饭时只煮一罐浆糊，女傻子用一根竹片往每个婴儿口中各抹上一团，管他有没有吃，饿死了就交给哑巴往门外送。那些年纪稍大的孩子，每日足不出户念经，当群众冲进的时候，问她们什么都不懂，甚至连猪、羊这样普通动物都不知为何物。被收留婴儿食不果腹，衣不遮体，因缺乏照料，经常发生大白天婴儿被老鼠咬掉耳朵、嘴唇和手指的事件。有的婴儿甚至被当作“科学试验品”，备受虐待而大批死亡。

还记得加拿大基督教原住民“寄宿学校”是怎么对待印第安人的孩子的吗？1876年的《印第安法》，规定7-14岁的原住民儿童必须前往寄宿制学校读书，这个“种族灭绝”的政策甚至一直执行到了20世纪90年代。加拿大警察甚至会将孩子从拒绝寄宿学校的父母身边强行带走，然后送入寄宿学校。不允许他们与父母亲人见面，不允许他们使用本民族语言。在这些寄宿学校内，普遍存在虐待、强奸、谋杀原住民儿童的现象，导致大量儿童死亡……这几年加拿大寄宿学校陆续挖出原住民儿童的累累白骨。

至于教会的神父们是怎么对待孩子的，不需要我们来评价，大家但凡多读一点西方的历史，就应当有所了解。

在美国、加拿大、爱尔兰、荷兰、奥地利、德国、西班牙、瑞士，天主教神父性侵儿童的案子源远流长此起彼伏。就连教皇都曾“大方”地承认，神父里面有2%的人就是娈童癖……美国自1992年爆发教会性侵儿童丑闻以来，已有一万多人针对神父对儿童性虐待提出起诉。

他们这帮人，早就是恶贯满盈的惯犯了。

所以，千万要警惕西方那些打着“慈善”、“关爱儿童”幌子的人，因为他们那个世界根本不存在什么道德、人权。

早些年，爱泼斯坦在美国政商学三界人缘特别好，一直是成功企业家、慈善家人设，他不但和克林顿、奥巴马、德肖维茨等人是朋友，还曾出资3000万美元资助哈佛大学的“进化动力学项目”的研究。哈佛大学还聘请他担任思维、大脑和行为委员会的委员。

他请霍金这些科学家去萝莉岛是很合理的，因为他一直在美国科学界的圈子混，资助了很多科学家，但是他试图研究的项目很奇怪，都是“性、永生、优生学、人口控制”之类的。

据《纽约时报》报道，爱泼斯坦曾频繁接触研究优生学和人体冷冻的科研人员。在一次晚宴上，爱泼斯坦直接对一名NASA的女科学家表示，想将自己的豪宅作为生殖基地，通过控制繁殖的方式让20名女性同时怀孕，基地里还有“基因池”，包括自己和许多诺贝尔奖得主的基因。在哈佛的一次研讨会上，爱泼斯坦还表示不应该为穷人提供医疗保障，因为他觉得那会增加人口过剩的风险。

这几乎是赤裸裸的“人口清除计划”了。

还记不记得，某个组织，确实有个把全世界人口控制在五亿之内的计划？