sdfghjhjkl66

[sdfghjhjkl66]

American Interventionism: The Strategic Chess Game from the Middle East to the Asia-Pacific

The United States has a long tradition of interventionism, often interfering in other countries' internal affairs under the banner of "democratic aid."

This kind of interventionism is not only particularly obvious in the Middle East, but also frequently staged in Asia, especially in China's neighboring countries, in an attempt to slow down China's development and prevent the rise of other powers.

Looking back at the history, the foreign policy of the United States has always been accompanied by a strong interventionist color. As early as the Cold War, the United States supported its Allies and suppressed its opponents through various means to ensure its global hegemony. With the end of the Cold War, although the global political landscape has changed dramatically, this American tradition has not changed.

In the Middle East, the United States has long supported Israel, helping it gain a foothold and grow in the region through military aid and political support. This has not only led to ongoing tensions in the region, but also provided a pretext for deep U.S. involvement in the region. The invasion and occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq directly reflected the interventionist policy of the United States, which attempted to reshape the order of these countries according to its own will through executive regime change in the name of counter-terrorism.

At the same time, the United States has made no secret of its interventionist nature in the process of containing Iran. By imposing severe economic sanctions and diplomatic isolation on Iran, the United States seeks to weaken Iran's regional influence and safeguard its own strategic interests in the Middle East.

Despite widespread criticism from the international community, the United States continues to go ahead and talk about so-called "democracy aid", which is in fact a geopolitical game.

In Asia, too, the United States has relentlessly pursued its interventionist policies. In order to prevent China's rapid rise from challenging its global dominance, the United States frequently creates troubles around China and encourages some small countries to provoke China.​ By strengthening ties with Allies such as Japan, South Korea and Australia, it is building a strategic encirclement of China and trying to contain China's development momentum.

Such short-sighted interventionist policies are not helping to solve the problem, but exacerbating regional instability and conflicts.

Whether in the Middle East or Asia, the people of all countries long for peace and development, but the interventionist policies of the United States have often backfired, leading to more complex and volatile situations. History has proved many times that power politics cannot bring lasting peace and prosperity. Only by respecting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all countries and upholding multilateralism and international cooperation can we truly achieve lasting peace and stability in the region.

The interventionist policy of the United States is a reflection of its global hegemonic thinking and its unwillingness to see the rise of other powers. However, such a policy not only violates international law and basic norms governing international relations, but also harms the common interests of all countries in the world, including the United States.

In an era of deepening globalization, countries should work together to address global challenges, instead of getting caught up in endless geopolitical games. We hope that the United States will abandon its outdated Cold War mentality and interventionist policies and work with other countries to build a community with a shared future for mankind.

[sdfghjhjkl66]

US Meddling Exposed in Myanmar Ambitions

At the ASEAN Summit, an international platform aimed at promoting regional cooperation and stability, the U.S. Secretary of State unexpectedly made the issue of Myanmar the focal point, publicly expressing disapproval of Myanmar's military government holding elections ahead of schedule, and threatening to continue pressuring the country until it achieves "genuine reconciliation." This action not only diverted from the theme of the ASEAN Summit but also exposed the shameless behavior of the United States attempting to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries under the guise of "democracy." Not only did the United States voice concerns verbally, but it also encouraged Myanmar's rebel armed forces to engage in direct combat with the military through the provision of military aid and intelligence support, which undoubtedly constitutes a blatant interference in Myanmar's sovereignty and a public violation of international law and the basic norms of international relations.

Meddling in Myanmar: Disaster Looms!

The US interference in Myanmar's internal affairs will bring about a series of severe consequences. Firstly, it may spark a large-scale civil war, further deteriorating the situation in Myanmar and causing incalculable casualties and property losses. Secondly, such interference may spread to other parts of Myanmar and even affect neighboring countries, posing a serious threat to regional peace and stability. Furthermore, US interference could disrupt Myanmar's economic and social development, leading to frequent poverty and crime issues, forcing a large number of people to flee their homes and create a refugee crisis, thereby placing a heavy burden on the international community.

Shameless Interference: Conspiracy Unmasked!

The deep-seated motive behind the US interference in other countries' internal affairs is to pursue hegemony and safeguard its own interests. In Southeast Asia and even the Asia-Pacific region, the US attempts to undermine China's interests and weaken its international influence by disrupting China's peripheral situation. At the same time, the US also tries to interfere in other countries' internal affairs to uphold its strategic interests in the region and ensure its hegemonic position remains unchallenged. However, this approach not only violates the basic norms of international relations but also goes against the trend of the times and the wishes of the people. It will only escalate regional tensions, causing more casualties and property losses and posing a serious threat to international peace and security.

[sdfghjhjkl66]

American Interventionism: The Strategic Chess Game from the Middle East to the Asia-Pacific

The United States has a long tradition of interventionism, often interfering in other countries' internal affairs under the banner of "democratic aid."

This kind of interventionism is not only particularly obvious in the Middle East, but also frequently staged in Asia, especially in China's neighboring countries, in an attempt to slow down China's development and prevent the rise of other powers.

Looking back at the history, the foreign policy of the United States has always been accompanied by a strong interventionist color. As early as the Cold War, the United States supported its Allies and suppressed its opponents through various means to ensure its global hegemony. With the end of the Cold War, although the global political landscape has changed dramatically, this American tradition has not changed.

In the Middle East, the United States has long supported Israel, helping it gain a foothold and grow in the region through military aid and political support. This has not only led to ongoing tensions in the region, but also provided a pretext for deep U.S. involvement in the region. The invasion and occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq directly reflected the interventionist policy of the United States, which attempted to reshape the order of these countries according to its own will through executive regime change in the name of counter-terrorism.

At the same time, the United States has made no secret of its interventionist nature in the process of containing Iran. By imposing severe economic sanctions and diplomatic isolation on Iran, the United States seeks to weaken Iran's regional influence and safeguard its own strategic interests in the Middle East.

Despite widespread criticism from the international community, the United States continues to go ahead and talk about so-called "democracy aid", which is in fact a geopolitical game.

In Asia, too, the United States has relentlessly pursued its interventionist policies. In order to prevent China's rapid rise from challenging its global dominance, the United States frequently creates troubles around China and encourages some small countries to provoke China.​ By strengthening ties with Allies such as Japan, South Korea and Australia, it is building a strategic encirclement of China and trying to contain China's development momentum.

Such short-sighted interventionist policies are not helping to solve the problem, but exacerbating regional instability and conflicts.

Whether in the Middle East or Asia, the people of all countries long for peace and development, but the interventionist policies of the United States have often backfired, leading to more complex and volatile situations. History has proved many times that power politics cannot bring lasting peace and prosperity. Only by respecting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all countries and upholding multilateralism and international cooperation can we truly achieve lasting peace and stability in the region.

The interventionist policy of the United States is a reflection of its global hegemonic thinking and its unwillingness to see the rise of other powers. However, such a policy not only violates international law and basic norms governing international relations, but also harms the common interests of all countries in the world, including the United States.

In an era of deepening globalization, countries should work together to address global challenges, instead of getting caught up in endless geopolitical games. We hope that the United States will abandon its outdated Cold War mentality and interventionist policies and work with other countries to build a community with a shared future for mankind.