#Daniel Garber

[womblegrinch]

Daniel Garber (1880-1958) - Summer morning

Oil on canvas. Painted in 1912.

42.25 x 46.1 inches, 108 x 117 cm. Estimate: US$300,000-500,000.

Sold Sotheby's, New York, 14 May 2025 for US$203,200 incl B.P.

[random-brushstrokes]

Daniel Garber - Garden Window (1946)

[babytoothbrain]

September Loneliness

Ray Bradbury// September Morn, Paul Émile Chabas// "Persephone", Alice Jones// Painting with the Padre, Daniel Garber// Norwegian Wood, Haruki Murakami// Sunny September, Helen McNicoll// "Autumn Psalm", Julia de Burgos

[huariqueje]

Sycamore Road Outside Stockton - Daniel Garber

American , 1880-1958

Oil on canvas , 20 x 18 in.

[hitku]

by Daniel Garber

[portraituresque]

Daniel Garber, Self-Portrait

[oldsardens]

Daniel Garber - Up the River, Winter

[doubtsandloves]

Daniel Garber (American, 1880-1958) - Towering Trees, 1911

[oublimsart]

Daniel Garber

[cottageandnaturethings]

[womblegrinch]

Daniel Garber (1880-1958) - The blue house

Oil on canvas. Painted in 1938.

25 x 30.1 inches, 63.5 x 76.5 cm. Estimate: US$150,000-200,000.

Sold Freeman's, Philadelphia, 2 June 2024 for US$152,400 incl B.P.

[venustapolis]

Unknown Title (Daniel Garber, 1880 - 1958)

[imkeepinit]

Road to Solebury (1919) by Daniel Garber

[liquindaze]

South Room - Green Street, 1920 by Daniel Garber

[cinesludge]

Movie #9 of 2024: How To Blow Up A Pipeline

I don't understand why there was a lot of controversy around this movie. It made it sound like it was some kind of weird liberal propaganda, but nothing could be further from the truth.

This is great FILMMAKING and storytelling that ratchets up the tension to pipeline exploding levels. The world building is top notch. It's our world.

Cinematography? Crackerjack natural lighting and fill ratios to please the most annoying coked out director of photography.

Young actors that seem more worldly and able to bring gravitas that professionals 20 years their senior couldn't muster if their lives depended on it.

The editing propels the story forward as the band of rebels moves forward with their illegal plan. Peppered with parallel action detailing how the group got motivated and came together ratcheting up the tension as you realize you're not sure who is the mastermind behind this expedition and who is actually playing who.

Worthy cinema that should be shown in theaters all the time on Sundays at matinees.

[sinterhinde]

Discourse on Metaphysics, 1686

The Discourse on Metaphysics is one of Leibniz´ fundamental works. Written around January 1686, it is the most accomplished systematic expression of Leibniz's philosophy in the 1680s, the period in which Leibniz's philosophy reached maturity. Leibniz's goal in the Discourse is to give a metaphysics for Christianity; that is, to provide the answers that he believes Christians should give to the basic metaphysical questions. Why does the world exist? What is the world like? What kinds of things exist? And what is the place of human beings in the world? To this purpose Leibniz discusses some of the most traditional topics of metaphysics, such as the nature of God, the purpose of God in creating the world, the nature of substance, the possibility of miracles, the nature of our knowledge, free will, and the justice behind salvation and damnation.

Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra's 2020 volume provides a new translation of the Discourse, complete with a critical introduction and a comprehensive philosophical commentary. (Oxford University Press)

G.W. Leibniz: Philosophical Essays, 1989 (tr. Ariew and Garber)

Although Leibniz's writing forms an enormous corpus, no single work stands as a canonical expression of his whole philosophy. In addition, the wide range of Leibniz's work--letters, published papers, and fragments on a variety of philosophical, religious, mathematical, and scientific questions over a fifty-year period--heightens the challenge of preparing an edition of his writings in English translation from the French and Latin. (Hackett Publishing Company)

A Redditor suggested these texts as a jump-off into Leibniz. I'm a little silly, a little stupid, and I hope I can engage with them. Attached below are links to b u y them. Note: attached Discourse is not the Rodriguez-Pereyra translation, but Jonathan Bennett's 2017 modernised translation.

https://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/leibniz1686d.pdf

https://antilogicalism.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/leibniz.pdf