#Stockpicker Analysis

[stockmarketlivetv]

He DUMPED Tesla at $488 Calling it FRAUD - Now His Top Pick Will EXPLODE Shattering Market Records from Intuitive Code AI on Vimeo.

#Tesla #ElonMusk #StockMarket #Investing #TradingTips #StockPicks #AI #TechStocks #WallStreet #FinancialNews � THE MAN WHO CALLED TESLA'S PEAK AT $488 JUST REVEALED HIS NEXT PICK Alex Vieira LIVE dumped Tesla at $488 while calling out Musk's "well-engineered fraud" - and he was RIGHT. Now he's found the REAL AI play that will dominate 2025. � WHAT YOU'LL DISCOVER:

Why Tesla's autonomous driving will NEVER work (technical breakdown) The $37 stock pattern that created 1,035% gains on CyberArk How TSLL (Tesla ETF) will crash to SINGLE DIGITS CoreWeave: The hidden AI infrastructure gem at $37 Why this could be 2025's best-performing stock

⚡ KEY MOMENTS: 0:04 - Tesla dumped LIVE at $488 (with proof) 0:18 - "Well-engineered fraud since day one" 0:24 - TSLL short strategy revealed 0:30 - CoreWeave $37 entry point 0:40 - The $37 → $420 CyberArk pattern 0:50 - "Best stock of 2025" prediction � ALEX VIEIRA'S LEGENDARY TRACK RECORD: ✅ CyberArk: $37 → $420 (1,035% gains) ✅ Palantir: 900% rally called ✅ Cloudflare: 300% gains ✅ Tesla exit: Perfect $488 timing ✅ $500 million in documented profits � GET THE COMPLETE ANALYSIS: Full CoreWeave breakdown with exact price targets, portfolio allocation strategies, and technical analysis: autonomoustrading.io/blog/coreweave-hidden-gem-37-dollars-alex-vieira-best-stock-2025-tesla-fails

[gis2080]

📊 Trading Apps = 💸 Stock trading app market will nearly triple by 2034, going from $13.6B to $39.2B. Growth rate? A slick 11.2%.

Stock Trading Apps have transformed the investment landscape, making trading accessible to anyone with a smartphone. These platforms offer real-time market data, intuitive interfaces, and a range of tools for buying, selling, and analyzing stocks, ETFs, and other financial instruments. Whether you’re a seasoned investor or a beginner, trading apps provide the flexibility to manage your portfolio on the go. Features like commission-free trading, fractional shares, instant deposits, and educational content have attracted millions of users globally.

To Request Sample Report : https://www.globalinsightservices.com/request-sample/?id=GIS24057 &utm_source=SnehaPatil&utm_medium=Article

Many apps now include AI-driven insights, risk analysis, social trading, and automated investing options to enhance user experience. The surge in retail investing, driven by social media and financial influencers, has further propelled the popularity of trading apps. Security, speed, and transparency are key priorities, and top platforms continuously update their tech stacks to ensure compliance and user protection. As markets evolve, stock trading apps are integrating crypto trading, robo-advisors, and ESG filters, offering a holistic financial experience. The democratization of finance is well underway, and trading apps are at the heart of this financial revolution.

#stocktradingapp #investingmadeeasy #fintechrevolution #mobiletrading #tradingsimplified #financialfreedom #smartinvesting #digitalfinance #daytradinglife #fractionalshares #commissionfree #stockmarketapp #retailinvestors #portfolioapp #investmenttools #tradingcommunity #techdriveninvesting #realtimedata #tradingplatforms #marketinsights #automatedinvesting #stockalerts #aiinfinance #cryptoandstocks #esginvesting #roboadvisor #finfluencer #personalfinance #digitalwallet #wealthbuilding #stockpicks #tradingsignals #fintechinnovation #investorapp #financegoals #mobilebrokerage

Research Scope:

· Estimates and forecast the overall market size for the total market, across type, application, and region

· Detailed information and key takeaways on qualitative and quantitative trends, dynamics, business framework, competitive landscape, and company profiling

· Identify factors influencing market growth and challenges, opportunities, drivers, and restraints

· Identify factors that could limit company participation in identified international markets to help properly calibrate market share expectations and growth rates

· Trace and evaluate key development strategies like acquisitions, product launches, mergers, collaborations, business expansions, agreements, partnerships, and R&D activities

About Us:

Global Insight Services (GIS) is a leading multi-industry market research firm headquartered in Delaware, US. We are committed to providing our clients with highest quality data, analysis, and tools to meet all their market research needs. With GIS, you can be assured of the quality of the deliverables, robust & transparent research methodology, and superior service.

Contact Us:

Global Insight Services LLC 16192, Coastal Highway, Lewes DE 19958 E-mail: info@globalinsightservices.com Phone: +1–833–761–1700 Website: https://www.globalinsightservices.com/

[stockxpo]

Swing Trade Stock Picks

🌀💹 Maximize your short-term trading with swing trade stock picks from StockXpo! Our curated selections focus on stocks with high potential for quick profits, backed by in-depth market analysis. Whether you’re a seasoned trader or just starting, StockXpo provides the insights you need. Discover the latest opportunities at https://stockxpo.com/stock-picks/. 🚀💼 #SwingTrading #StockPicks #MarketInsights

[avidtrader]

These Three Short Squeeze Stocks Will ROAST Short Sellers!

These Three Short Squeeze Stocks Will ROAST Short Sellers! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h34rUlHdsjI Three highly shorted stocks will roast short sellers. List of high short interest stocks can force a squeeze! ✅ Subscribe To My Channel For More Videos: https://www.youtube.com/@AvidTrader/?sub_confirmation=1 ✅ Stay Connected With Me: 👉 (X)Twitter: https://twitter.com/RealAvidTrader 👉 Stocktwits: https://ift.tt/nt1sS0J 👉 Instagram: https://ift.tt/lPHfKwc ============================== ✅ Other Videos You Might Be Interested In Watching: 👉 The ULTIMATE Guide to Finding Hidden Gem Stocks | AvidTrader https://youtu.be/pZAKJLk9o0I 👉 🧨GameStop Short Squeeze 2.0 Incoming??🧨 https://youtu.be/XeFVaq4BHfU 👉 🙌💎 When Should You Diamond Hand a Stock? 💎🙌 https://youtu.be/ZO62i0cq0PQ 👉 This Penny Stock is a GUARANTEED Double!! https://youtu.be/Yx6wZNz95dM ============================= ✅ About AvidTrader: Value Investor. Discussing Day & Swing Trades Also Long Term Investments! Stock Breakdowns. Grow Your Trading Account Effectively. Technical Analysis and Pattern Recognition. How to Make Money, But More Importantly Learning & Having Fun in The Process! Avid Trader is not a Series 7 licensed investment professional, but a digital marketing manager/content creator to publicly traded and privately held companies. Avid Trader receives compensation from its clients in the form of cash and restricted securities for consulting services. 🔔 Subscribe to my channel for more videos: https://www.youtube.com/@AvidTrader/?sub_confirmation=1 ===================== #gme #gmeshortsqueeze #gmestocks #gamestop #gamestopstock #amc #amcstock #amcstocknews #stockanalysis #stockstobuy #stockpicks #stockearnings #bullish #optionstrading #shortsqueeze #shortinterest #shortselling #shorts #robinhood #memestocks #technicalanalysis #fundamentalanalysis #carvana #cvna #altstock #highshortinterest #squeezestocks #shortsqueezes Disclaimer: We do not accept any liability for any loss or damage which is incurred from you acting or not acting as a result of reading any of our publications. You acknowledge that you use the information we provide at your own risk. I am not a certified financial advisor and you must do your own research and due diligence before ever buying or selling a stock. never trade solely based on someone else's word or expectations of a stock! Copyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use © AvidTrader via AvidTrader https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCK_XU3FW-ffEK8BG5EisnNA June 25, 2024 at 05:33AM

[11graphs]

Using FCF instead of EPS, $UNICY remains the lowest dividend.

[stockconsultant-blog]

$TRVN (TRVN) Trevena stock attempting to move higher after recent pullback to 1.51 support area, analysis https://stockconsultant.com/?TRVN

Target 1: 2.02   Profit: 26.2%   Stop/Trailing Stop: 1.49Loss: 6.9%   P/L ratio: 3.8 : 1 - ExcellentTarget 2: 2.16   Profit: 35%   P/L ratio: 5.1 : 1 - Excellent  Extreme rally

[ericfruits]

Value investing is struggling to remain relevant

IT IS NOW more than 20 years since the Nasdaq, an index of technology shares, crashed after a spectacular rise during the late 1990s. The peak in March 2000 marked the end of the internet bubble. The bust that followed was a vindication of the stringent valuation methods pioneered in the 1930s by Benjamin Graham, the father of “value” investing, and popularised by Warren Buffett. For this school, value means a low price relative to recent profits or the accounting (“book”) value of assets. Sober method and rigour were not features of the dotcom era. Analysts used vaguer measures, such as “eyeballs” or “engagement”. If that was too much effort, they simply talked up “the opportunity”.

Plenty of people sense a replay of the dotcom madness today. For much of the past decade a boom in America’s stockmarket has been powered by an elite of technology (or technology-enabled) shares, including Apple, Alphabet, Facebook, Microsoft and Amazon. The value stocks favoured by disciples of Graham have generally languished. But change may be afoot. In the past week or so, fortunes have reversed. Technology stocks have sold off. Value stocks have rallied, as prospects for a coronavirus vaccine raise hopes of a quick return to a normal economy. This might be the start of a long-heralded rotation from overpriced tech to far cheaper cyclicals—stocks that do well in a strong economy. Perhaps value is back.

This would be comforting. It would validate a particular approach to valuing companies that has been relied upon for the best part of a century by some of the most successful investors. But the uncomfortable truth is that some features of value investing are ill-suited to today’s economy. As the industrial age gives way to the digital age, the intrinsic worth of businesses is not well captured by old-style valuation methods, according to a recent essay by Michael Mauboussin and Dan Callahan of Morgan Stanley Investment Management.

The job of stockpicking remains to take advantage of the gap between expectations and fundamentals, between a stock’s price and its true worth. But the job has been complicated by a shift from tangible to intangible capital—from an economy where factories, office buildings and machinery were key to one where software, ideas, brands and general know-how matter most. The way intangible capital is accounted for (or rather, not accounted for) distorts measures of earnings and book value, which makes them less reliable metrics on which to base a company’s worth. A different approach is required—not the flaky practice of the dotcom era but a serious method, grounded in logic and financial theory. However, the vaunted heritage of old-school value investing has made it hard for a fresher approach to gain traction.

Graham’s cracker

To understand how this investment philosophy became so dominant, go back a century or so to when equity markets were still immature. Prices were noisy. Ideas about value were nascent. The decision to buy shares in a particular company might by based on a tip, on inside information, on a prejudice, or gut feel. A new class of equity investors was emerging. It included far-sighted managers of the endowment funds of universities. They saw that equities had advantages over bonds—notably those backed by mortgages, railroads or public utilities—which had been the preferred asset of long-term investors, such as insurance firms.

This new church soon had two doctrinal texts. In 1934 Graham published “Security Analysis” (with co-author David Dodd), a dense exposition of number-crunching techniques for stockpickers. Another of Graham’s books is easier to read and perhaps more influential. “The Intelligent Investor”, first published in 1949, ran in revised editions right up until (and indeed beyond) Graham’s death in 1976. The first edition is packed with sage analysis, which is as relevant today as it was 70 years ago.

Underpinning it all is an important distinction—between the price and value of a stock. Price is a creature of fickle sentiment, of greed and fear. Intrinsic value, by contrast, depends on a firm’s earnings power. This in turn derives from the capital assets on its books: its factories, machines, office buildings and so on.

The approach leans heavily on company accounts. The valuation of a stock should be based on a conservative multiple of future profits, which are themselves based on a sober projection of recent trends. The book value of the firm’s assets provides a cross-check. The past might be a crude guide to the future. But as Graham argued, it is a “more reliable basis of valuation than some other future plucked out of the air of either optimism or pessimism”. As an extra precaution, investors should seek a margin of safety between the price paid for a stock and its intrinsic value, to allow for any errors in the reckoning. The tenets of value investing were thus established. Be conservative. Seek shares with a low price-earnings or price-to-book ratio.

The enduring status of his approach owes more to Graham as tutor than the reputation he enjoyed as an investor. Graham taught a class on stockpicking at Columbia University. His most famous student was Mr Buffett, who took Graham’s investment creed, added his own twists and became one of the world’s richest men. Yet the stories surrounding Mr Buffett’s success are as important as the numbers, argued Aswath Damodaran of New York University’s Stern School of Business in a recent series of YouTube lectures on value investing. The bold purchase of shares in troubled American Express in 1964; the decision to dissolve his partnership in 1969, because stocks were too dear; the way he stoically sat out the dotcom mania decades later. These stories are part of the Buffett legend. The philosophy of value investing has been burnished by association.

It helped also that academic finance gave a back-handed blessing to value investing. An empirical study in 1992 by Eugene Fama, a Nobel-prize-winning finance theorist, and Kenneth French found that volatility, a measure of risk, did not explain stock returns between 1963 and 1990, as academic theory suggested it should. Instead they found that low price-to-book shares earned much higher returns over the long run than high price-to-book shares. One school of finance, which includes these authors, concluded that price-to-book might be a proxy for risk. For another school, including value investors, the Fama-French result was evidence of market inefficiency—and a validation of the value approach.

All this has had a lasting impact. Most investors “almost reflexively describe themselves as value investors, because it sounds like the right thing to say”, says Mr Damodaran. Why would they not? Every investor is a value investor, even if they are not attached to book value or trailing earnings as the way to select stocks. No sane person wants to overpay for stocks. The problem is that “value” has become a label for a narrow kind of analysis that often confuses means with ends. The approach has not worked well for a while. For much of the past decade, value stocks have lagged behind the general market and a long way behind “growth” stocks, their antithesis (see chart 1). Old-style value investing looks increasingly at odds with how the economy operates.

In Graham’s day the backbone of the economy was tangible capital. But things have changed. What makes companies distinctive, and therefore valuable, is not primarily their ownership of physical assets. The spread of manufacturing technology beyond the rich world has taken care of that. Any new design for a gadget, or garment, can be assembled to order by contract manufacturers from components made by any number of third-party factories. The value in a smartphone or a pair of fancy athletic shoes is mostly in the design, not the production.

In service-led economies the value of a business is increasingly in intangibles—assets you cannot touch, see or count easily. It might be software; think of Google’s search algorithm or Microsoft’s Windows operating system. It might be a consumer brand like Coca-Cola. It might be a drug patent or a publishing copyright. A lot of intangible wealth is even more nebulous than that. Complex supply chains or a set of distribution channels, neither of which is easily replicable, are intangible assets. So are the skills of a company’s workforce. In some cases the most valuable asset of all is a company’s culture: a set of routines, priorities and commitments that have been internalised by the workforce. It can’t always be written down. You cannot easily enter a number for it into a spreadsheet. But it can be of huge value all the same.

A beancounter’s nightmare

There are three important aspects to consider with respect to intangibles, says Mr Mauboussin: their measurement, their characteristics, and their implications for the way companies are valued. Start with measurement. Accounting for intangibles is notoriously tricky. The national accounts in America and elsewhere have made a certain amount of progress in grappling with the challenge. Some kinds of expenditure that used to be treated as a cost of production, such as R&D and software development, are now treated as capital spending in GDP figures. The effect on measured investment rates is quite marked (see chart 2). But intangibles’ treatment in company accounts is a bit of a mess. By their nature, they have unclear boundaries. They make accountants queasy. The more leeway a company has to turn day-to-day costs into capital assets, the more scope there is to fiddle with reported earnings. And not every dollar of R&D or advertising spending can be ascribed to a patent or a brand. This is why, with a few exceptions, such spending is treated in company accounts as a running cost, like rent or electricity.

The treatment of intangibles in mergers makes a mockery of this. If, say, one firm pays $2bn for another that has $1bn of tangible assets, the residual $1bn is counted as an intangible asset—either as brand value, if that can be appraised, or as “goodwill”. That distorts comparisons. A firm that has acquired brands by merger will have those reflected in its book value. A firm that has developed its own brands will not.

The second important aspect of intangibles is their unique characteristics. A business whose assets are mostly intangible will behave differently from one whose assets are mostly tangible. Intangible assets are “non-rival” goods: they can be used by lots of people simultaneously. Think of the recipe for a generic drug or the design of a semiconductor. That makes them unlike physical assets, whose use by one person or for one kind of manufacture precludes their use by or for another.

In their book “Capitalism Without Capital” Jonathan Haskel and Stian Westlake provided a useful taxonomy, which they call the four Ss: scalability, sunkenness, spillovers and synergies. Of these, scalability is the most salient. Intangibles can be used again and again without decay or constraint. Scalability becomes turbo-charged with network effects. The more people use a firm’s services, the more useful they are to other customers. They enjoy increasing returns to scale; the bigger they get, the cheaper it is to serve another customer. The big business successes of the past decade—Google, Amazon and Facebook in America; and Alibaba and Tencent in China—have grown to a size that was not widely predicted. But there are plenty of older asset-light businesses that were built on such network effects—think of Visa and Mastercard. The result is that industries become dominated by one or a few big players. The same goes for capital spending. A small number of leading firms now account for a large share of overall investment (see chart 3).

Physical assets usually have some second-hand value. Intangibles are different. Some are tradable: you can sell a well-known brand or license a patent. But many are not. You cannot (or cannot easily) sell a set of relationships with suppliers. That means the costs incurred in creating the asset are not recoverable—hence sunkenness. Business and product ideas can easily be copied by others, unless there is some legal means, such as a patent or copyright, to prevent it. This characteristic gives rise to spillovers from one company to another. And ideas often multiply in value when they are combined with other ideas. So intangibles tend to generate bigger synergies than tangible assets.

The third aspect of intangibles to consider is their implications for investors. A big one is that earnings and accounting book value have become less useful in gauging the value of a company. Profits are revenues minus costs. If a chunk of those costs are not running expenses but are instead spending on intangible assets that will generate future cashflows, then earnings are understated. And so, of course, is book value. The more a firm spends on advertising, R&D, workforce training, software development and so on, the more distorted the picture is.

The distinction between a running expense and investment is crucial for securities analysis. An important part of the stock analyst’s job is to understand both the magnitude of investment and the returns on it. This is not a particularly novel argument, as Messrs Mauboussin and Callahan point out. It was made nearly 60 years ago in a seminal paper by Merton Miller and Francesco Modigliani, two Nobel-prize-winning economists. They divided the value of a company into two parts. The first—call it the “steady state”—assumes that that the company can sustain its current profits into the future. The second is the present value of future growth opportunities—essentially what the firm might become. The second part depends on the firm’s investment: how much it does, the returns on that investment and how long the opportunity lasts. To begin to estimate this you have to work out the true rate of investment and the true returns on that investment.

The nature of intangible assets makes this a tricky calculation. But worthwhile analysis is usually difficult. “You can’t abdicate your responsibility to understand the magnitude of investment and the returns to it,” says Mr Mauboussin. Old-style value investors emphasise the steady state but largely ignore the growth-opportunities part. But for a youngish company able to grow at an exponential rate by exploiting increasing returns to scale, the future opportunity will account for the bulk of valuation. For such a firm with a high return on investment, it makes sense to plough profits back into the firm—and indeed to borrow to finance further investment.

Picking winners in an intangible economy—and paying a price for stocks commensurate with their chances of success—is not for the faint-hearted. Some investments will be a washout; sunkenness means some costs cannot be recovered. Network effects give rise to winner-takes-all or winner-takes-most markets, in which the second-best firm is worth a fraction of the best. Value investing seems safer. But the trouble with screening for stocks with a low price-to-book or price-to-earnings ratio is that it is likelier to select businesses whose best times are behind them than it is to identify future success.

Up, up and away

Properly understood, the idea of fundamental value has not changed. Graham’s key insight was that price will sometimes fall below intrinsic value (in which case, buy) and sometimes will rise above it (in which case, sell). In an economy mostly made up of tangible assets you could perhaps rely on a growth stock that had got ahead of itself to be pulled back to earth, and a value stock that got left behind to eventually catch up. Reversion to the mean was the order of the day. But in a world of increasing returns to scale, a firm that rises quickly will often keep on rising.

The economy has changed. The way investors think about valuation has to change, too. This is a case that’s harder to make when the valuation differential between tech and value stocks is so stark. A correction at some stage would not be a great surprise. The appeal of old-style value investing is that it is tethered to something concrete. In contrast, forward-looking valuations are by their nature more speculative. Bubbles are perhaps unavoidable; some people will extrapolate too far. Nevertheless, were Ben Graham alive today he would probably be revising his thinking. No one, least of all the father of value investing, said stockpicking was easy. ■

This article appeared in the Briefing section of the print edition under the headline "Diminished value"

https://ift.tt/2UmyAqE

[phungthaihy]

Starbucks CEO: China Business Recovery | Mad Money | CNBC http://ehelpdesk.tk/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/logo-header.png [ad_1] Starbucks CEO Kevin Johnson tell... #agile #amazonfba #analysis #breakingnews #business #businessfundamentals #businessnews #cable #cablenews #ceointerview #cnbc #cramermadmoney #cramernetworth #cramerstocks #excel #finance #financefundamentals #financenews #financestock #financialanalysis #financialmodeling #forex #interview #investing #jimcramer #jimcramercnbc #jimcramerinterview #jimcramerstocks #jimcramertwitter #madmoneyinterview #madmoneyjimcramer #marketnews #microsoft #money #moneytips #moneytipsmadmoneytvprogram #newschannel #newsstation #pmbok #pmp #realestateinvesting #sql #stockadvice #stockmarket #stockperformance #stockpicks #stocktrading #tableau #usnews #worldnews

[stockmarketlivetv]

He DUMPED Tesla at $488 Calling it FRAUD - Now His Top Pick Will EXPLODE Shattering Market Records from Intuitive Code AI on Vimeo.

#Tesla #ElonMusk #StockMarket #Investing #TradingTips #StockPicks #AI #TechStocks #WallStreet #FinancialNews � THE MAN WHO CALLED TESLA'S PEAK AT $488 JUST REVEALED HIS NEXT PICK Alex Vieira LIVE dumped Tesla at $488 while calling out Musk's "well-engineered fraud" - and he was RIGHT. Now he's found the REAL AI play that will dominate 2025. � WHAT YOU'LL DISCOVER:

Why Tesla's autonomous driving will NEVER work (technical breakdown) The $37 stock pattern that created 1,035% gains on CyberArk How TSLL (Tesla ETF) will crash to SINGLE DIGITS CoreWeave: The hidden AI infrastructure gem at $37 Why this could be 2025's best-performing stock

⚡ KEY MOMENTS: 0:04 - Tesla dumped LIVE at $488 (with proof) 0:18 - "Well-engineered fraud since day one" 0:24 - TSLL short strategy revealed 0:30 - CoreWeave $37 entry point 0:40 - The $37 → $420 CyberArk pattern 0:50 - "Best stock of 2025" prediction � ALEX VIEIRA'S LEGENDARY TRACK RECORD: ✅ CyberArk: $37 → $420 (1,035% gains) ✅ Palantir: 900% rally called ✅ Cloudflare: 300% gains ✅ Tesla exit: Perfect $488 timing ✅ $500 million in documented profits � GET THE COMPLETE ANALYSIS: Full CoreWeave breakdown with exact price targets, portfolio allocation strategies, and technical analysis: autonomoustrading.io/blog/coreweave-hidden-gem-37-dollars-alex-vieira-best-stock-2025-tesla-fails

[michaelmalcolmwalkeasicaus-blog]

Michael Malcolm Walker ASIC | 5 Investment Managers You Must Learn From

Legions of investment masters beckon us to comply with, but is any person really worth our money and time? The most preferred financier in the world is Warren Buffett, however is he actually our best example? Why do we look for to emulate Buffett, and also not various other stunningly effective investment supervisors? Does he deserve his oracle standing? While you might not agree with all the differing designs, let's examine him alongside various other epic capitalists:

  Warren Buffett

  He has actually been turned into the icon of the American Dream. With his modest demeanor as well as aw-shucks perspective, he acquires high quality service for less than they deserve, where the market dominance of the company develops a "margin of safety" in the supply. His issue is that a number of his investments are in decreasing industries, where he might have marketed the businesses and reinvested in much better firms (see Dairy Queen).

  He learned investing from Ben Graham, that first discussed this margin of safety. Yet in time, Warren evolved from acquiring respectable companies for dirt cheap to getting wonderful firms for a fair rate. The good news is for him, he is now the customer of selection for closely-held businesses, which provides him the right of first rejection for deals hard to reach to most managers. Sadly, errors like selling index puts near the marketplace highs have actually slightly tainted his admirable credibility.

  Aside from heading a big company and also his standing the globe's wealthiest guy for a while, what makes him so endearing? The general public swoons over his picture as a modest, realistic guy making easy buys that the ordinary financier believes they can imitate. His major technique, on its face, is fairly basic, yet 20% returns over 50+ years is by no accounts very easy.

Michael Malcolm Walker ASIC

David Swensen

  Beside Buffett, Swensen has among the very best online reputations today. He has actually handled the Yale endowment given that 1985, gathering compounded returns of 14.5% even after a 25% drop in the last. He advocates easy buy and also hold allotments in a retail investor's profile, going so far as to advise his own careless profile:

  - 30% in Lead Total Stock Market Index (VTSMX) - 20% in Vanguard REIT Index (VGSIX) - 20% in Lead Overall International Stock (VGTSX) or (15% inVDMIX and also 5% in VEIEX) - 15% in Vanguard Rising Cost Of Living Protected Stocks (VIPSX) - 15% in Lead Short Term Treasury Index (VFISX).

  Nevertheless, his success at Yale doesn't lie in easy buy as well as hold. He is popular for moving beyond regular supply as well as bond appropriations right into alternate investments, consisting of hedge funds, private equity, timber, assets, etc. He may still purchase and also hold his investments, but he has access to the best alpha-producing supervisors on the planet, and maximizes their availability.

  He says that ordinary capitalists need to not try to pick investments, as they are hopelessly outclassed by institutions with the best analytics, ability and methods.

  George Soros.

  Simply put, his technique is to ride large worldwide fads, and after that maximize his idea in Reflexivity. Reflexivity is the principle that malfunctioning idea systems create unsustainable patterns. When the belief pervades the wonderful bulk of market participants, a reduced threat profession can be made in the opposite instructions of the pattern.

Walker Capital

He is intriguing in that his wonderful need is to be born in mind not as a financier, but as a theorist as well as philanthropist, donating funds to encourage freedom in eastern Europe, as well as proclaiming his theory of Reflexivity.

  He is most popular for "damaging" the Financial institution of England, betting versus the extra pound as a result of a faulty plan. His various other most notable accomplishment is establishing (with Jim Rogers) and handling the Quantum fund to typical returns of 30% from 1970-2000. His strategies are much more difficult to mimic than Buffett's, as he bets on money, stocks as well as bonds around the globe, needing a diverse financial acumen far past any normal financial investment manager.

  William O'Neill.

  He is the creator of Investor's Company Daily, and among the first to wed essential as well as technological analysis right into the same stockpicking approach. He promotes acquiring more recent supplies with high profits growth as well as reduced financial obligation, but only if they have leading price action during a bull market. His most beneficial lesson is the saying of cutting your losses at no greater than 7-8%. He creates comprehensive selling rules for all possible circumstances because he discovered firsthand that it's not the earnings that make a fantastic capitalist, yet knowing exactly how to take a loss.

  In order to succeed with his technique, one need to keep a watch checklist of suitable stocks, waiting for a supply to reach a buy point. This factor is meant to be the least risky rate at which to get. O'Neill's method is prominent due to the fact that it presents the possibility for large returns while limiting losses.

  Richard Dennis.

  It is really understandable if you have actually not heard his name before. Dennis traded his account from a couple of hundred dollars to $200mm. He is well-known for creating the "Turtle Traders," a team of trend-following investors that he educated from square one to come to be effective financial investment supervisors. He would trade any asset classes, however developed inflexible technical buy and sell rules that he followed consistently, trading breakouts towards the current market trend. While his technical method was relatively simple, it required technique that was really hard for most individuals. He himself suffered large losses when he deviated from his strategy.

  Are you willing to backtest methods and also follow the proven ones also when they underperform the market, in exchange for fantastic returns in the long run? Learn from Richard Dennis.

  Verdict.

  Regardless of design, you can learn from each of the above investors. Each is a master of their own design, a design that fits their individuality and strengths entirely. Buffett can never ever comply with Richard Dennis, and Swensen might not be a George Soros. If you find a financial investment style you are comfortable with, persevere whatsoever prices.

  A word of care, though. Just how much of your life are you ready to dedicate to financial investments? If you are not ready to live as well as breath the marketplaces, don't even think of international macro. If your feelings get the best of you, steer clear of from Richard Dennis. The simplest to adhere to would be Swensen, who as a master property allocator does not trade specific properties, however instead functions to diversify as well as find the very best managers.

  Do you believe it is possible to imitate the masters, or is it totally luck that has made them effective? Exist any type of other managers that you think are much better than those above? Can any kind of average individual come to be an excellent investor?

[stockxpo]

Swing Trade Stock Picks

Maximize your short-term trading with swing trade stock picks from StockXpo! 🌀💹 Our curated selections focus on stocks with high potential for quick profits, backed by in-depth market analysis. Whether you’re a seasoned trader or just starting, StockXpo provides the insights you need. Discover the latest opportunities at https://stockxpo.com/stock-picks/. 🚀💼

#SwingTrading #StockPicks #MarketInsights

[avidtrader]

These Penny Stocks Look Primed to Explode Alongside $GME This Week!

These Penny Stocks Look Primed to Explode Alongside $GME This Week! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMnAymSzjFA These Penny Stocks Look Primed to Short Squeeze This Week Alongside GameStop Stock! ✅ Subscribe To My Channel For More Videos: https://www.youtube.com/@AvidTrader/?sub_confirmation=1 ✅ Stay Connected With Me: 👉 (X)Twitter: https://twitter.com/RealAvidTrader 👉 Stocktwits: https://ift.tt/YM0KWEB 👉 Instagram: https://ift.tt/MiVpFeW ============================== ✅ Other Videos You Might Be Interested In Watching: 👉 The ULTIMATE Guide to Finding Hidden Gem Stocks | AvidTrader https://youtu.be/pZAKJLk9o0I 👉 🧨GameStop Short Squeeze 2.0 Incoming??🧨 https://youtu.be/XeFVaq4BHfU 👉 🙌💎 When Should You Diamond Hand a Stock? 💎🙌 https://youtu.be/ZO62i0cq0PQ 👉 This Penny Stock is a GUARANTEED Double!! https://youtu.be/Yx6wZNz95dM ============================= ✅ About AvidTrader: Value Investor. Discussing Day & Swing Trades Also Long Term Investments! Stock Breakdowns. Grow Your Trading Account Effectively. Technical Analysis and Pattern Recognition. How to Make Money, But More Importantly Learning & Having Fun in The Process! Avid Trader is not a Series 7 licensed investment professional, but a digital marketing manager/content creator to publicly traded and privately held companies. Avid Trader receives compensation from its clients in the form of cash and restricted securities for consulting services. 🔔 Subscribe to my channel for more videos: https://www.youtube.com/@AvidTrader/?sub_confirmation=1 ===================== #gme #gmeshortsqueeze #gmestocks #gamestop #gamestopstock #amc #amcstock #amcstocknews #stockanalysis #stockstobuy #stockpicks #stockearnings #bullish #optionstrading #shortsqueeze #shortinterest #shortselling #shorts #robinhood #memestocks #technicalanalysis #fundamentalanalysis #roaringkitty #pennystocks #pennystocktrading #pennystockstobuynow #nvos Disclaimer: We do not accept any liability for any loss or damage which is incurred from you acting or not acting as a result of reading any of our publications. You acknowledge that you use the information we provide at your own risk. I am not a certified financial advisor and you must do your own research and due diligence before ever buying or selling a stock. never trade solely based on someone else's word or expectations of a stock! Copyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use © AvidTrader via AvidTrader https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCK_XU3FW-ffEK8BG5EisnNA June 10, 2024 at 08:15AM

[11graphs]

Office REITs Industry

Today we are looking at the Office REITs industry majors:

1/5 - Profitability GECINA ($GECFF) is the most profitable company. MIRVAC ($MRVGF) and VORNADO REALTY ($VNO) are the least profitable.

2/5 - Management Effectiveness CORESITE REALTY ($COR) is the most efficient company. JAPAN REAL ESTATE ($JREIF) and GECINA ($GECFF) are the least efficient.

3/5 - Indebtedness CORESITE REALTY ($COR) and HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES ($HIW) are the least indebted. JAPAN REAL ESTATE ($JREIF) is the most indebted.

4/5 - Price MIRVAC ($MRVGF) and CORESITE REALTY ($COR) are near their 52w high. SL GREEN REALTY ($SLG) is near its 52w low.

5/5 - Valuation HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES ($HIW) is the cheapest. NIPPON BUILDING FUND ($NBFJF) and ALEXANDRIA REAL ESTATE ($ARE) are the pricest.

Do not hesitate to like and subscribe to support us ;) Thanks! Have a good day!

#Analysis #Chart #Charts #Debt #Dividend #Dividends #Equities #Finance #Financial #FinancialMarket #FundamentalAnalysis #Graphs #Insurance #Invest #Investing #Investment #Investor #LongTermInvesting #LongTermInvestment #PassiveIncome #PersonalFinance #RealEstate #REIT #Stock #StockCharts #StockMarket #StockPicks #Stocks #Valuation #ValueInvesting

[stockconsultant-blog]

$AMD (AMD) Advanced Micro Devices stock with a nice high trade quality bounce off 25.15 triple support area, short term upside targets T1 and T2 , 29.53 and 31.04, analysis https://stockconsultant.com/?AMD

[bitcoinaussie]

Rural Funds Group is a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) who own a diversified portfolio of agricultural assets in Australia and derive income from leasing those assets to experienced agricultural operators, Rural Funds Group offer an attractive 6.13% dividend yield.

As Rural Funds Group is a real estate trust their income shouldn't be too impacted by poor performance in the agricultural sector, as tenants still need to pay rent, for this reason I feel that Rural Funds Group is a fairly safe bet with a high yield dividend payout.

Here are a couple more reasons I decided to buy Rural Funds Group shares.

RFF shares are trading at an almost 30% discount from its year high at $2.42

Dividend yield of 6.13%

RFF has recently increased its dividend

Rural Funds Group is in the top 25% of dividend payers in Australia (5.6%)

Stable management with the average tenure of 9.6 years

Tenants still need to pay rent regardless of an underperforming sector.

Some things to consider about Rural Funds Group

Debt is quite high at 60% however this is how REITS operate and a low interest rate environment might be good for RFFs investments.

As I continue my investment journey and build my stockpicking toolbelt this analysis will continue to become more detailed.

Rural Fund Group's dividend

At the time of consideration Rural Funds Group pays a 6.13% or 11 cents per share dividend, now with an investment of $1500 that nets you about $95, compare that to my bank account that currently pays 1.6% pa or $24 with $1500 in savings.

Rural Funds Group currently has a payout ratio of 82% with a future payout ratio of 81% and it's future cash flow value more than covers future dividend payouts.

Need another opinion? Check out the Motley Fools thoughts on RFF 

https://www.fool.com.au/2019/11/07/3-reasons-why-i-think-rural-funds-is-the-best-dividend-share-on-the-asx-today/

Those are my thoughts on Rural Funds Group, if you have any thoughts on Rural Funds Group shares feel free to leave a comment below.

Please note that this article should not be considered as investment advice, you can read the full disclaimer at our Site Disclaimer Page.

[phungthaihy]

2020 STOCK MARKET COLLAPSE: My Long-Term Dividend Investing Perspective http://ehelpdesk.tk/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/logo-header.png [ad_1] The 2020 stock market crash, glo... #2020 #2020crash #agile #amazonfba #analysis #bearmarket #bestdividendstocks #business #businessfundamentals #collapse #covid19 #crash #dividend #dividendaristocrats #dividendcut #dividendinvesting #dividendstock #dividendstocks #dividends #excel #favoritestocks #financefundamentals #financialanalysis #financialmodeling #forex #howtoinvest #howtoinvestin2020 #ianlopuch #invest #investing #investor #longterminvesting #losingmoney #market #microsoft #mistakes #money #personalfinance #pmbok #pmp #ppcian #realestateinvesting #recession #sql #stock #stockmarket #stockmarketcrash #stockmarketinvesting #stockpick #stockpicks #stocktrading #stocks #tableau #value #virus