#Xscope linux alternative

[managementlong]

Xscope linux alternative

#Xscope linux alternative software#

#Xscope linux alternative code#

“By paying companies like Novell and Canonical (through Azure for example) Microsoft has created the financial conditions that cultivate abandonment of GNU/Linux as a desktop platform.”Look at ’s front page. “Stay out of our turf,” they implicitly suggest or signal, “and you shalt be paid…” Microsoft couldn’t be happier!īy paying companies like Novell and Canonical (through Azure for example) Microsoft has created the financial conditions that cultivate abandonment of GNU/Linux as a desktop platform. Does the Linux Foundation want Linux to actually succeed? Or does it just want the Linux Foundation to succeed (in financial terms)? It certainly seems as though, over time, it’s more and more of the latter. The more we started digging, the more worried we became. “Does the Linux Foundation want Linux to actually succeed? Or does it just want the Linux Foundation to succeed (in financial terms)?”Things have changed.Įarlier this year we began examining pertinent bits of evidence, based on pointers sent to us from people with connections (not necessarily insiders).

#Xscope linux alternative software#

Its adherence or commitment to Free software was never a big thing, but at least it was more or less loyal to GNU/Linux about a decade ago. THE Linux Foundation makes us increasingly cynical about its use of the brand “Linux”, hence the scare quotes in the headline.

#Xscope linux alternative code#

Summary: The Linux Foundation has just announced a new Microsoft-funded initiative that’s pushing GitHub and CLAs (passing copyrights on code to corporations) Lust for money can also be a nonprofit’s Achilles heel Posted in Deception, GNU/Linux, Microsoft at 1:15 pm by Dr. The ‘Linux’ Foundation is Acting Like a Microsoft ISV Now, Commitment to Linux and FOSS Deteriorates Even Further Leave Your Comment Send this to a friend Back in the days they did care, but then the EPO sanctioned them, whereupon some key bloggers left (“Merpel” virtually vanished) and comments about EPO abuses started to be deleted if not impeded. They don’t seem to care that the EPO defies the very rules that govern its existence. These ads/puff pieces (EQEs) merely highlight the gross apathy is not complicity. “…those who can point out such violations are not capable of speaking out notice how there’s still not a single article in the media or so-called ‘IP’ blogs about G 2/19.”“Patent law cannot exist in isolation from the technical subject matter to which patents are concerned,” Rose Hughes wrote yesterday in IP Kat, which is not the blog it used to be. Kluwer Patent Blog) are well aware, not to mention JUVE. What’s more, those who can point out such violations are not capable of speaking out notice how there’s still not a single article in the media or so-called ‘IP’ blogs about G 2/19. THE Campinos/ Battistelli-led European Patent Office ( EPO) is interfering with justice and grossly violating the EPC every single day. Summary: The very legitimacy of years’ worth of rulings and the EPO’s abusive attacks on judges are under the microscope but the media isn’t paying any attention, perhaps deliberately Shades of something like controversial D notices Posted in Europe, Patents at 11:41 pm by Dr. 07.18.19 2 Days Later (Case in Progress) and Still Media Silence About G 2/19