#a fun thing about my fact-checking for econ articles includes digging into the background of who wrote the Pro Studies on things

[phoenixyfriend]

I like to think I'm good at spotting misinformation, or at least misleading titles/summaries, but if I do reblog something with misinfo that I could reasonably be expected to just Not Know, which is likely because there is so much going on, all the time, everywhere... please just tell me which post it is and why it's wrong? I'm willing to check things for myself, but there's a lot of stuff out there and I need a place to start.