#andrew brettler

[one-time-i-dreamt]

Colleen Ballinger's lawyer was prince Andrew's lawyer? Also Bill Cosby's, Danny Masterson's, Horatio Sanz, Armie Hammers...

[itsbansheebitch]

lmao the added context is putting me in the dirt, like damn, Vanity Fair really said, "I'm going to support a groomer and pretend nothing happened!"

Like seriously, did they think they could just reach out to Colleen's lawyers, talk shit about Adam, discredit her victims, and @ ADAM on Instagram and then Andrew Quintana is surprised when Adam has shit to say??? Like, dude, YOU ARE the one who REACHED OUT.

And you know what this bastard does? He turns off the comments on his most recent Instagram posts, and when Adam comments on his latest post that still has comments on, Andrew turns off ALL comments, and then BLOCKS ADAM???

Like dude, you can't talk about "misinformation" and "trusted sources" when referring to your OWN ARTICLE and then NOT back that shit up. Pure disrespect from a 2023 graduate. Unbelievable.

[lauraannegilman]

NPR says: “Trade magazine The Bookseller reported that Gaiman hired the crisis management firm Edendale Strategies and lawyer Andrew Brettler, who has represented Danny Masterson and Prince Andrew.”

I guess it’s true, you are known by the company you keep.

[theseshipsshallsail]

I'm actually afraid that with the jonah hill thing going on strong in sm and that bulgarian weirdo getting more traction again by making up more bs that someone iss gonna try and accuse Armie of something again and he's investigated again. How are peolpe still believing her when most outlets are starting to admit that her bs ss were never verified?

Nonny, the deluded fuckwit is currently tagging a fake Andrew Brettler account and screaming she's been stalked by Kent Schaffer because he replied to someone else on a post she commented on.

She's irrelevant.

Facts are facts are facts.

Everyone BTS, the LADA included, knows EXACTLY what really happened, so unless Lying Lizzie wants to try something with someone else and lose custody completely (maybe she wants to free up time for her busy binge-drinking schedule, idk) it's onwards and upwards for Armie Hammer.

[ausetkmt]

Tiffany Haddish's Ex-Friend Defends Serving Her Legal Papers Outside Comedy Club, Says Actress 'Refuses' to Apologize for Extortion Allegations

Trizah Morris explained why Tiffany Haddish was served outside of the Laugh Factory.

Tiffany Haddish's former friend defended serving the actress with legal papers outside of the Laugh Factory in Hollywood, telling RadarOnline.comexclusively that Haddish has yet to apologize for accusing her of extortion.

RadarOnline.com told you first that Trizah Morris had filed a defamation lawsuit one year after her children sued the comedian.

Haddish was served around 6:45 PM on August 28, 2023, allowing Morris' $1 million lawsuit to move forward in court.

"Tiffany Haddish was dodging service at her residence, so we had to serve her at the Laugh Factory," Morris told RadarOnline.com in a statement on Thursday.

Morris is suing Haddish and fellow stand-up comic Aries Spears, detailing in court docs how she was close with the Girls Trip star from 2011 to 2020 but was not friends with Spears despite meeting him in 2014.

She accused Haddish of grooming her kids and having them perform sexually inappropriate skits in 2014.

Morris is the mother of two adults who sued Haddish and Spears for child sexual abuse over sketches they filmed with the comedians while they were minors.

Jane Doe alleged Haddish had her film a scene where she simulated oral sex and also claimed her brother was used for a skit with Spears about a pedophile's fantasy.

Haddish's attorney, Andrew Brettler, previously told TMZ the lawsuit was an extortion attempt last fall, claiming, "Plaintiff's mother, Trizah Morris, has been trying to assert these bogus claims against Ms. Haddish for several years."

The comedians denied all allegations of wrongdoing and labeled the lawsuit a shakedown for money.

"While this sketch was intended to be comedic, it wasn't funny at all – and I deeply regret having agreed to act in it," Haddish also said. "I really look forward to being able to share a lot more about this situation as soon as I can."

As we reported at the time, the plaintiffs dismissed the case in September 2022.

Morris filed her lawsuit over statements Haddish and Spears made after her children sued.

Morris later filed her lawsuit over statements the comedians made, labeling her an extortionist.

The court docs stated she claimed to have called Haddish's lawyer in February to ask the actress to release a statement clearing her from the extortion claims.

Morris said she got a call from Haddish in March and was told by Haddish that she would address it if the question was brought up, alleging the actress instead spoke negatively about her in a press tour interview weeks later.

"Haddish refuses to apologize to me for lying about being extorted," Morris alleged to RadarOnline.com on Thursday. "Tiffany Haddish thinks this is a joke and she [allegedly said in April 2023] that Hollywood is going to protect her, that's why she became Jewish."

Morris claimed that Haddish made the last remark when she asked Haddish about clearing the extortion claims.

[newsper]

Sean “Diddy” Combs is facing significant legal challenges as his lawyer has filed a motion to withdraw from a sex trafficking case. The attorney, Andrew Brettler, has stated that he cannot continue to represent Combs “under any circumstances.” However, he has not provided specific reasons for this decision. This development comes amid serious allegations made […]

[whatiwillsay]

What firm is the anon talking about? That represents bad boys in the armie doc

i guess this one?

[mafaldaknows]

So where was this bold declaration of the truth a year ago?

Rumors aren’t facts, yet people who believe unsubstantiated rumors even when presented with the facts can and have destroyed lives and livelihoods.

We must do a better job of defending the truth in order to combat this disturbing trend of believing allegations as if they were facts, and of pillorying the accused, without due process, in the virtual town square.

We are better than this. ⚖️💪❤️🧿

[malina-6886]

[itsbansheebitch]

Colleen apologized to Trish after Trish posted her "Colleen" video. She APOLOGIZED for sending pictures (from OF) of her to FANS. Does Andrew Brettler know his client has ADMITTED to a FEDERAL CRIME? Sending obscene & explicit material to minors is a fucking F-E-L-O-N-Y. I used to not think she was going to court, but now I'm thinking she might actually get charged.

Remember, originally, when Trish confronted Colleen, Colleen lied her face and said that ADAM sent them to HER. Which implied that some sort of conversation including these pictures DID HAPPEN. Now we know that she was the one sending them FOR SURE (Not that I didn't believe Adam in the first place, but 100% confirmation is always nice)

(Sorry for the blurry screenshot, it was originally posted on Reddit's r/colleenballingersnark by another user)

[the-fall-of-armie-hammer]

Well. Birds of a disgusting feather.

[theseshipsshallsail]

The puke sprinkler is going after Kent Schafer now. And ofc tagging her fake Andrew Brettler account in the process. She's so fucking desperate for some crumbs of attention from Armie or someone close ti him it's unreal. Oh, and she's also doxxing random psychologist in the name of metoo and her "trauma".

Hope Kent is smart and either blocks her ass or puts a TRO on her.

Hey, Nonny, perhaps she'd be better off reposting her old pole dancing videos for all the fucks Armie or anyone else gives about her pathetic attention seeking? 🤷‍♀️

[news-folds]

Who Is Andrew Brettler? Tiffany Haddish Hires Same Lawyer as Prince Andrew

Who Is Andrew Brettler? Tiffany Haddish Hires Same Lawyer as Prince Andrew

Actress and comedian Tiffany Haddish has hired Hollywood entertainment lawyer Andrew Brettler, who previously represented Prince Andrew, after she was accused of child sexual abuse in a new lawsuit. The lawsuit, which was first reported by The Daily Beast, alleges that Haddish and fellow comedian Aries Spears sexually abused a girl and her brother, who were 14 and 7 years old at the time, in two…

[news-tey]

Who Is Andrew Brettler? Tiffany Haddish Hires Same Lawyer as Prince Andrew

Who Is Andrew Brettler? Tiffany Haddish Hires Same Lawyer as Prince Andrew

Actress and comedian Tiffany Haddish has hired Hollywood entertainment lawyer Andrew Brettler, who previously represented Prince Andrew, after she was accused of child sexual abuse in a new lawsuit. The lawsuit, which was first reported by The Daily Beast, alleges that Haddish and fellow comedian Aries Spears sexually abused a girl and her brother, who were 14 and 7 years old at the time, in two…

[houseofbrat]

Andrew, his lawyers, and his publicists really trying to work the refs in the UK press via Camilla Tominey in The Telegraph ten days ago:

There is also hope that any unsealing of court papers in the Dershowitz case may clear up an ongoing confusion over Ms Giuffre’s place of residence.

Mr Brettler initially tried to halt the US civil case against the Duke by claiming that the federal court in New York did not have jurisdiction over the matter because Ms Giuffre is domiciled in Australia, not Colorado as she alleged.

Arguing the case should be halted until the “issue of subject matter jurisdiction is adjudicated”, he wrote to the court in December 2021: “In her complaint Ms Giuffre alleges she is a citizen of the state of Colorado; the evidence demonstrates that she is actually domiciled in Australia, where she has lived for all but two of the past 19 years.

“It is undisputed that at the time she filed this action Ms Giuffre had an Australian driver’s licence and was living in a $A1.9 million [about £1.1 million] home in Perth, Western Australia, where she and her husband have been raising their three children.

“In reality, Ms Giuffre’s ties to Colorado are very limited. She has not lived there since at least 2019 – approximately two years before she filed this lawsuit against Prince Andrew – and potentially, according to her own deposition testimony, not since October 2015.”

Ms Brettler said Ms Giuffre only recently registered to vote in Colorado using her mother and stepfather’s mailing address there.

Yet the court rejected this argument, along with Mr Brettler’s plea for the case to be thrown out because Ms Giuffre had a “tortured interpretation” of the law she was relying on. He said some of the alleged offences were said to have happened outside New York state and beyond the jurisdiction of the New York Child Victims Act (CVA) that she was using.

Because this is what the US FEDERAL JUDGE had to say about it:

LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge.

Defendant moves for an order compelling plaintiff to respond to“targeted” but as yet unspecified “written discovery requests pertaining to her domicile,” requiring her “to submit to a two-hour remote deposition limited to the issue of her domicile,” and staying all other discovery until the Court determines whether subject matter exists, lack of which would be a potential defense that the defendant refers to as “anticipated” and that he concededly has not actually raised.

The motion (Dkt 58) is denied, substantially for the reasons set forth in the plaintiff's opposition to defendant’s motion. Among other relevant points, it appears that the defendant previously served on the plaintiff extensive discovery, including at least one comprehensive request for documents relating to her domicile, to which responses are due, and have been promised, by January 14. See Dkt. 58-2, at 2.

This ruling is without prejudice to any defense of lack of subject matter jurisdiction that defendant may raise by motion or by answer. It likewise is made without determining the merit, or lack of merit, in plaintiff's assertion that defendant’s motion is “a transparent attempt to delay discovery into his own documents and testimony.” Dkt. 60, at 2.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 31, 2021

What were some of the reasons set forth in the plaintiff’s opposition? Consider this portion: 

First, Prince Andrew has not made a strong showing that any forthcoming motion he may file will have merit. Defendant repeatedly states that Plaintiff resides in Australia, but where she resides is not the question—it is her domicile, and domicile and residence are distinct legal concepts. See GTG Holdings, Inc. v. Amvensys Cap. Grp., LLC, 2016 WL 931215, at *1 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 11, 2016). “Domicile has been described as the place where a person has his true fixed home and principal establishment, and to which, whenever he is absent, he has the intention of returning.” Linardos v. Fortuna, 157 F.3d 945, 948 (2d Cir. 1998) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Accordingly, Plaintiff’s domicile is (and was at all relevant times) Colorado.

Defendant’s selective excerpts of Plaintiff’s prior depositions omit testimony that demonstrates her intent to return to Colorado. For example, Plaintiff testified that she and her husband left Colorado because his elderly father needed their imminent care in Australia after multiple surgeries.(2) As Defendant himself points out, Plaintiff is registered to vote in Colorado, where her mother currently resides. See Dkt. 58-9. 3 These facts, and additional evidence for which Defendant has already sought discovery, establish Plaintiff’s Colorado citizenship. See, e.g., King v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 505 F.3d 1160, 1171 (11th Cir. 2007) (domicile in California where parents testified that, prior to plaintiff’s dying while living abroad, she intended to return home).

Defendant mischaracterizes Plaintiff’s pleadings in the Dershowitz case to suggest, for example, that an allegation in a proposed amended complaint that she “was a citizen of the State of Colorado” is an admission that she was no longer a citizen of Colorado at the time of amendment. Mot at 4. Plaintiff worded the allegation in that way, however, because diversity jurisdiction over her second amended complaint depended on the court having jurisdiction at the time of filing the action. See, e.g., Coury v. Prot, 85 F.3d 244, 248 (5th Cir. 1996) (“diversity of citizenship must exist at the time the action is commenced”).

There we have it. Domicile and residence are different legal concepts in the USA. 

Andrew’s “friend” who talked to Tominey is really dumb. 

“He settled without admitting any guilt and has always resolutely insisted that he has been falsely accused. He’s been utterly consistent about that for more than a decade.

“But when he settled, it didn’t clear his name. So there is a legal resolution, but this was always a three-stage process: legal resolution, followed by clearing his name, followed by whatever it is he wants to do next.

“You can’t expect the Duke to live permanently in this no man’s land with a legal resolution of a civil case, no investigation by any legal authority, let alone any charges. He’s not been found guilty of anything in a court of law, yet in the court of public opinion, his name remains sullied because people think there is no smoke without fire.

“No investigation”? 

You refused to talk to the US DOJ, remember Andrew? Because believe me, everyone at the prosecutor’s office at SDNY remembers. And your Mummy isn’t around to protect you any longer. 

Keep your “sources” talking in the UK press, Andrew. People who work at the US Department of Justice can read articles on the internets just like everyone else. They can see you sending out that bimbo, aka Lady Victoria Hervey, and doing yourself no favors. 

Keep it up Andrew and the US DOJ will grant your wish for an official and very PUBLIC acknowledgement that they’ve been investigating you! 

[armies-army]

It's amazing to me that since the interview with Andrew Brettler came out, now Effie has moved on with her preoccupation with the Depp/Heard trial.

Well, that's a good thing but It's funny how a person who falsely accused someone of abuse and murder literally, is now casually giving their opinions on stuff on social media, and no one is saying anything. But it's not a big deal right? Cause he's a rich white man, he don't deserve no benifit of doubt or an apology even though he's the victim.