#correlationresults2017 | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

danandphilsurvey · 8 years ago

Text

Analysis requests: Age

This first set of results shows the relationship between the age of the viewer and their responses, with conclusions written above the cut and full results and explanation of methodology to be found below the cut, along with a brief definition of terms.

Age/Are you subscribed to Phil? vs Age/Are you subscribed to Dan?

- People who only watch Phil are not significantly older than those who only watch Dan, but both groups are significantly older than those who watch both.

Age/In what year did you discover danisnotonfire/AmazingPhil?

- Respondents who started watching in the earlier years are older.

Age/Overall do you prefer the content of danisnotonfire or AmazingPhil?

- People who have no specific preference are significantly younger than those who prefer Dan's or Phil's content, and people who prefer Phil's content are significantly older than those who don't have a specific preference or prefer Dan's content.

Age/Who do you relate to the most?

- People who find Phil more relatable are significantly older than people who find Dan more relatable.

Age/Who are you most attracted to?

- People who are most attracted to Phil are significantly older than people who are more attracted to Dan.

Age/Who would you rather be friends with?

- There is no significant difference between the ages of people dependent on who they would rather be friends with.

Age/Do you ship Phan?

- People who ship Phan are significantly younger than those who do not ship Phan.

Age/Which of the following do you think is most likely to describe Dan and Phil’s relationship in real life?

- People who believe that Dan and Phil have or have had a romantic background are significantly older than those who believe in a platonic background.

Age/Do you consider yourself to be part of the phandom?

- These three groups differ significantly in age, in all combinations. People who consider themselves part of the phandom are younger than those who do not, or only partially do, and people who do not consider themselves as a part of the phandom are older than those who do, or only partially do.

Age/Is the Phandom the only fandom you belong to?

- Respondents who are in multiple fandoms are significantly younger.

Age/Whether or not you consider yourself part of a website’s phandom, where do you choose to see or discuss Dan and Phil related content?

Age/Do you read phanfiction?

- People who read phanfiction are significantly younger than those who do not.

Age/Do you send premium messages?

- People who send Premium msgs in Phil's and Dan's chat are significantly younger than those who do not send Premiums.

Age/Would you approach Dan and Phil if you saw them randomly?

- Respondents who wouldn't/haven't approached them are significantly older than those who would or have approached them.

Age/Did you attend TATINOF?

- There is no significant difference between the ages of people who did or did not attend TATINOF.

Age/Have you ever purchased something from the Dan and Phil Shop?

- People who have purchased from the DAP Shop are significantly younger than those who have not.

n - number of responses.

M - mean, the average result.

SD - standard deviation. The average distance to the average result - showing if results are typically clustered around an average result, or if there is a wide range of results.

Significant difference (p < x)/Not significant - There is a mathematical way to determine if two numbers (for example the age averages of two groups) are actually different from one another, or if they are within the range of what is considered random variance. This is called the p-value and we consider differences between results ‘significant’ when the p-value is smaller than 0.05. For large samples such as this, most results are significant - this does not mean that the difference is particularly large, just that there is a difference.

Pearson r - a measure of the linear correlation between two variables, with a value of between -1 and 1. A negative correlation means that as one becomes higher the other becomes lower, a positive correlation means that as one becomes higher so does the other.

Age/Are you subscribed to Phil? vs Age/Are you subscribed to Dan?

(Only subscriptions to DINOF and AP were taken into consideration.)

Only watch Dan n = 91; M = 18.99; SD = 5.05

Only watch Phil n = 132; M = 19.32; SD = 5.01

Watch both n = 24,085; M = 16.52; SD = 3.55

Partially significant (p < 0.001): People who only watch Phil are not significantly older than those who only watch Dan, but both groups are significantly older than those who watch both.

Age/In what year did you discover danisnotonfire/AmazingPhil?

There is a significant (p < 0.01) negative correlation between year in which respondents started watching and their age (Pearson r = -.228). This means that respondents who started watching in the earlier years are older.

Age/Overall do you prefer the content of danisnotonfire or AmazingPhil?

Prefer Phil's content n = 2268; M = 17.47; SD = 4.4

Prefer Dan's content n = 5475; M = 17.06; SD = 3.66

No specific preference n = 16722; M = 16.28; SD = 3.40

Significant (p < 0.001): These three groups differ significantly in age, in all combinations. (People who have no specific preference are significantly younger than those who prefer Dan's or Phil's content, and people who prefer Phil's content are significantly older than those who don't have a specific preference or prefer Dan's content.)

Age/Who do you relate to the most?

Dan n = 12603; M = 16.62; SD = 3.42

Phil n = 2189; M = 17.27; SD = 4.55

Significant (p < 0.001): People who find Phil more relatable are significantly older than people who find Dan more relatable.

Age/Who are you most attracted to?

Dan n = 5324; M = 16.77; SD = 3.56

Phil n = 1255; M = 17.00; SD = 4.512

Significant (p < 0.001): People who are most attracted to Phil are significantly older than people who are more attracted to Dan.

Age/Who would you rather be friends with?

Dan n = 1707; M = 17.12; SD = 3.75

Phil n = 2596; M = 17.35; SD = 4.42

Not significant.

Age/Do you ship Phan?

(Simplified by only taking clear "Yes" and "No" answers)

Does not ship Phan n = 1332; M = 17.89; SD = 4.42

Ships Phan n = 13097; M = 16.29; SD = 3.55

Significant (p < 0.001): People who ship Phan are significantly younger than those who do not ship Phan.

Age/Which of the following do you think is most likely to describe Dan and Phil’s relationship in real life?

(Relationship question was recoded to reflect romantic background vs. platonic background. Romantic background = long term romantic relationship; they recently started a romantic relationship; they were romantic/sexual in the past, broke up and are now back together; they were romantic/sexual in the past, but now are just friends; they were romantic/sexual in the past, but now I don’t know. Platonic background = purely good friends; purely platonic best buds who mean the world to each other.)

Romantic background n = 12358 (50.3 %); M = 16.70; SD = 3.79

Platonic background n = 7781 (31.7 %); M = 16.29; SD = 3.27

Significant (p < 0.001): People who believe that Dan and Phil have or have had a romantic background are significantly older than those who believe in a platonic background.

Age/Do you consider yourself to be part of the phandom?

Yes n = 11811; M = 15.74; SD = 3.1

Partially n = 3615; M = 17.55; SD = 3.98

No n = 601; M = 18.46; SD = 4.27)

Significant (p < 0.001): These three groups differ significantly in age, in all combinations. People who consider themselves part of the phandom are younger than the other two groups, and people who do not consider themselves as a part of the phandom are older than the other two groups.

Age/Is the Phandom the only fandom you belong to?

(Filtered out respondents who replied that they are not in the phandom.)

Phandom as only fandom: n = 2477; M = 17.73; SD = 4.82

More fandoms than Phandom: n = 20127; M = 16.27; SD = 3.29

Significant (p < 0.001): Respondents who are in multiple fandoms are significantly younger.

Age/Whether or not you consider yourself part of a website’s phandom, where do you choose to see or discuss Dan and Phil related content?

Significance levels not included due to high number of possible comparisons.

Age/Do you read phanfiction?

Reads Phanfic n = 18090; M = 16.28; SD = 3.43

Does not read Phanfic n = 6423; M = 17.36; SD = 3.433

Significant (p < 0.001): People who read phanfiction are significantly younger than those who do not.

Age/Do you send premium messages?

- Phil:

Sends Premium msgs n = 1140; M = 15.94; SD = 3.63

Does not send n = 18408; M = 16.48; SD = 3.63

- Dan:

Sends Premium msgs n = 1180; M = 15.86; SD = 3.65

Does not send n = 18589; M = 16.49; SD = 3.48

Both significant (p < 0.001): People who send Premium msgs in Phil's and Dan's chat are significantly younger than those who do not send Premiums.

Age/Would you approach Dan and Phil if you saw them randomly?

(Answer options "Yes, I met Dan/Phil/both/individually" and "No, but I would approach if I saw them" were counted as "would approach them")

Would approach/has approached: n = 20205; M = 16.19; SD = 3.18

Wouldn't approached/hasn't appoached: n = 4308; M = 18.34; SD = 4.74

Significant (p < 0.001): Respondents who wouldn't/haven't approached them are significantly older than those who would or have approached them.

Age/Did you attend TATINOF?

Attended TATINOF: n = 6191; M = 16.62; SD = 3.54

Did not attend TATINOF: n = 18321; M = 16.55; SD = 3,62

Not significant

Age/Have you ever purchased something from the Dan and Phil Shop?

Has purchased n = 9285; M = 16.47; SD = 3.80

Has not purchased n = 13222; M = 16.78; SD = 3.55

Significant (p < 0.001): People who have purchased from the DAP Shop are significantly younger.

#correlationresults2017

255 notes · View notes

danandphilsurvey · 8 years ago

Text

Analysis requests: Sexuality

This second set of correlations features the correlation requests that had to do with the sexuality of both the viewers and their perception of Dan and Phil’s own sexualities. Once again conclusions are to be found above the cut and full results and explanation of methodology below the cut, along with a definition of terms.

In what year did you discover danisnotonfire?/Upon first impression, what did you think Dan’s sexual orientation was?

- There is basically no connection between results; basically no ability to predict how the viewer perceived Dan’s sexuality based on what year they began watching.

In what year did you discover AmazingPhil?/Upon first impression, what did you think Phil’s sexual orientation was?

- There is basically no connection between results; basically no ability to predict how the viewer perceived Phil’s sexuality based on what year they began watching.

Do you ship phan?/What do you currently think Dan/Phil’s sexual orientation is?

- There is a pretty weak connection linking whether or not people ship phan with what they assume Dan/Phil’s sexualities are.

What do you currently think Dan’s sexual orientation is?/What do you currently think Phil’s sexual orientation is?

- There is a medium connection between the sets of results; a medium degree of association of people thinking that Dan’s current sexual orientation is the same as Phil’s.

Upon first impression, what did you think Dan’s sexual orientation was?/ Upon first impression, what did you think Phil’s sexual orientation was?

- There is a medium to strong connection between the sets of results; a medium to strong degree of association of people’s initial perception of Dan’s sexual orientation being the same as Phil’s.

What do you currently think Dan’s sexual orientation is?/ Upon first impression what did you think Dan’s sexual orientation was?

- There is a pretty weak connection linking these two categories.

What do you currently think Phil’s sexual orientation is?/Upon first impression what did you think Phil’s sexual orientation was?

- There is a pretty weak connection linking these two categories.

What is your sexual orientation?/Who do you relate to the most?

- There is basically no connection between the two categories.

What is your sexual orientation?/Do you ship phan?

- There is basically no connection between the two categories.

What is your sexual orientation?/What do you currently think Dan’s sexual orientation is?

- The bars/bottom axis show the sexual orientation of the viewer; the percentages within the bars show how these viewers perceive Dan’s sexual orientation.

- There is a pretty weak connection between these two categories.

What is your sexual orientation?/What do you currently think Phil’s sexual orientation is?

- The bars/bottom axis show the sexual orientation of the viewer; the percentages within the bars show how these viewers perceive Phil’s sexual orientation.

- There is a pretty weak connection between these two categories.

Cramér's V - A value to express how closely related the responses to two survey questions are, ranked between 0 and 1. 1 would show total connection between two sets of responses - everyone who responded x for one question also answered y for a second one - while 0 would mean that there was no association between two sets of responses - people who responded x for one question are equally likely to respond any variable for a second question.

In what year did you discover danisnotonfire?/Upon first impression, what did you think Dan’s sexual orientation was?

- Cramér's V < 0.04; p < 0.001. Basically no connection.

In what year did you discover AmazingPhil?/Upon first impression, what did you think Phil’s sexual orientation was?

- Cramér's V < 0.04; p < 0.001. Basically no connection.

Do you ship phan?/What do you currently think Dan/Phil’s sexual orientation is?

- Cramér's V = 0.13 for Dan and = 0.15 for Phil; both p < 0.001. Pretty weak connection.

What do you currently think Dan’s sexual orientation is?/What do you currently think Phil’s sexual orientation is?

85.6% of respondents who selected they don't care/haven't thought about it regarding Dan's sexuality also replied that they don't care/haven't thought about Phil's.

85 % of respondents who prefer not to label Dan also prefer not to label Phil.

80.6 % of respondents who think Dan is straight also think Phil is straight.

77.5% don't have enough info to speculate (… you got this)

52.9 % bisexual

37.9 % other sexualities

33.6 % gay

28.2 % queer

22 % asexual

16 % pan

- Cramér's V = 0.47; p < 0.001. Medium connection.

Upon first impression, what did you think Dan’s sexual orientation was?/Upon first impression, what did you think Phil’s sexual orientation was?

90.5% of respondents who didn’t form an opinion about Dan's sexuality also didn't form an opinion about Phil’s.

73.6% of respondents who believed Dan was straight also believed that Phil was straight.

73.8 % of respondents who can't remember what they thought about Dan also don't remember what they thought about Phil

61.8 % other sexualities (… you get the hang of it)

43 % bisexual

43.4 % gay

38.3 % queer

19.8% pansexual

16.3 % asexual.

- Cramér's V = 0.51; p < 0.001. Medium to strong connection.

What do you currently think Dan’s sexual orientation is?/ Upon first impression what did you think Dan’s sexual orientation was?

For this question the five most frequently listed sexual orientation for current perception of orientation were used, and comparison results above 10% listed.

- Cramér's V = 0.14; p < 0.001. Pretty weak connection

What do you currently think Phil’s sexual orientation is?/Upon first impression what did you think Phil’s sexual orientation was?

For this question the five most frequently listed sexual orientation for current perception of orientation were used, and comparison results above 10% listed.

- Cramér's V = 0.17; p < 0.001. Pretty weak connection

What is your sexual orientation?/Who do you relate to the most?

- Cramér's V < 0.05. Basically no connection.

What is your sexual orientation?/Do you ship phan?

- Cramér's V < 0.08. Basically no connection.

What is your sexual orientation?/What do you currently think Dan’s sexual orientation is?

- The bars/bottom axis show the sexual orientation of the viewer; the percentages within the bars show how these viewers perceive Dan’s sexual orientation. The six most common viewer sexual orientations are depicted here.

- Cramér's V < 0.14; p < 0.001. Pretty weak connection.

What is your sexual orientation?/What do you currently think Phil’s sexual orientation is?

- The bars/bottom axis show the sexual orientation of the viewer; the percentages within the bars show how these viewers perceive Phil’s sexual orientation. The six most common viewer sexual orientations are depicted here.

- Cramér's V < 0.10; p < 0.001. Pretty weak connection.

#correlationresults2017

37 notes · View notes

danandphilsurvey · 8 years ago

Text

Analysis requests: Attraction and Views on ‘Phan’

This third set of analysis requests revolve both requests which include questions on who the viewer finds most attractive, then secondly requests which concern if a viewer ships Dan and Phil, or what they believe their relationship status to be in real life. As before conclusions can be found above the cut and full results and explanation of methodology below the cut, along with a brief definition of terms.

Which channel did you discover first?/Who are you most attracted to?

- There is a weak connection between which channel someone discovered first and who they are most attracted to; a weak connection of people answering the same for both questions.

In what year did you discover danisnotonfire/AmazingPhil?/Who are you most attracted to?

- There is basically no correlation between what year someone discovered Dan and Phil and who they are most attracted to.

Overall, do you prefer the content of danisnotonfire or AmazingPhil?/Who are you most attracted to?

- There is a medium to strong connection between people’s preference in content and who they are most attracted to; a medium to strong association of people answering the same for both questions.

Who do you relate to the most?/Who are you most attracted to?

- There is a medium connection between who people relate to most and who they are most attracted to; a medium association of people answering the same to each question.

Which channels of the following are you subscribed to?/Who are you most attracted to?

(Note: this request was submitted as ‘more attractive vs watch individual videos’. As there is no precise question to correlate with ‘watch individual videos’ ‘Which channels...’ has been taken to represent that.)

- There is basically no connection between which channels people watch and who they are most attracted to.

Which channel’s videos do you rewatch the most?/Who are you most attracted to?

- There is a medium connection between which channel people rewatch the most and who they are most attracted to; a medium association of people answering the same to each question.

Who are you most attracted to?/Who would you rather be friends with?

- There is a medium connection between who people are most attracted to and who they would rather be friends with; a medium association of people answering the same for each question.

In year did you discover danisnotonfire/AmazingPhil?/Do you ship phan?

- There is basically no connection between what year people discover Dan or Phil and if they ship phan.

Do you prefer individual or joint danisnotonfire and AmazingPhil content?/Do you ship phan?

- There is a weak connection between people’s preference for individual/joint content and if they ship phan.

Which channel did you discover first?/Do you ship phan?

- There is basically no correlation between which channel people discovered first and if they ship phan.

Which channel did you discover first?/Which of the following do you think is most likely to describe Dan and Phil’s relationship in real life?

- There is basically no correlation between which channel people discovered first and what they believe about Dan and Phil’s relationship status.

Do you consider yourself to be part of the phandom?/Do you ship phan?

- There is a medium connection between people considering themselves to be part of the phandom and if they ship phan; a medium association of people answering positively for each question.

Which of the following do you think is most likely to describe Dan and Phil’s relationship in real life?/Do you read phanfiction?

- There is a medium connection between beliefs about Dan and Phil’s real life relationship and whether or not they read fanfiction; a medium correlation indicating that more people who believe their relationship to have a romantic background also read phanfiction.

Note: p values are no longer being included as the large sample size leads to almost all results showing p < 0.001 - if a difference is not significant that will be stated.

Phi coefficient - Phi values function much the same as a Cramér's V, only with a more specific application - for 2x2 cross tables. Phi values run from one to minus one, again with a value of zero indicating no association between results, a positive score indicating positive association - people who answered x were more likely to answer y - and a negative score a negative association - people who answered x were less likely to answer y.

Which channel did you discover first?/Who are you most attracted to?

(Options for which channel discovered first were limited to ‘Both at the same time’, ‘danisnotonfire’ and ‘AmazingPhil’.)

18.7% of people who discovered AmazingPhil first find Phil most attractive, vs 8.5% of all respondents.

48.0% of people who discovered danisnotonfire first find Dan most attractive, vs 33% of all respondents.

44.2% of people who discovered both channels at the same time find both equally attractive, vs 34.7% of all respondents.

Cramér's V = 0.17. A weak connection.

In what year did you discover danisnotonfire/AmazingPhil?/Who are you most attracted to?

Cramér's V = 0.07. Basically no connection.

Overall, do you prefer the content of danisnotonfire or AmazingPhil?/Who are you most attracted to?

(Answer options ‘Dan’, ‘Phil’, and ‘Both equally’/’Don’t have a specific preference’ were used.)

39.1% of people who are most attracted to Phil also prefer his content.

44.6% of people who are most attracted to Dan also prefer his content.

85.7% of people who are attracted to both equally don't have any specific preference.

Cramér's V = 0.39. Medium to strong connection.

Who do you relate to the most?/Who are you most attracted to?

52% of people who relate to both equally also find both equally attractive.

47.5% of people who relate most to Dan also find Dan most attractive.

42.0% of people answered ‘neither’ for each category.

However, only 26.3% of people who relate to Phil the most are also most attracted to him.

Cramér's V = 0.2. Medium connection.

Which channels of the following are you subscribed to?/Who are you most attracted to?

(This request was submitted as ‘more attractive vs watch individual videos’. As there is no precise question to correlate with ‘watch individual videos’ ‘Which channels...’ has been taken to represent that. ‘Attracted to both equally’ and ‘neither’ answer options have also been removed for this request.)

79.9% of people who are subscribed to danisnotonfire are most attracted to Dan and 54.4% of people who are not subscribed to danisnotonfire are most attracted to Dan (Cramér's V = 0.08).

20.6% of people who are subscribed to AmazingPhil are most attracted to Phil and 10.9% who are not subscribed to AmazingPhil are most attracted to Phil (Cramér's V = 0.03).

There is no connection between which channels people watch and who they are most attracted to; Dan is considered more attractive regardless.

Which channel’s videos do you rewatch the most?/Who are you most attracted to?

(For "Most watched channel" answer options ‘About the same of each’, ‘danisnotonfire’, and ‘AmazingPhil’ were included. For most attractive, answer options ‘Both equally’, ‘Dan’, and ‘Phil’ were included.)

55.2 % of people who rewatch ‘about the same’ are equally attracted to both.

34.7% of people who rewatch AmazingPhil videos the most are more attracted to Phil.

68.7% of people who rewatch danisnotonfire videos the most are more attracted to Dan.

Cramér's V = 0.28. Medium connection.

Who are you most attracted to?/Who would you rather be friends with?

91.3% of those who are most attracted to both equally would also like to be friends with both equally. These numbers are much lower for Dan (14.4%), Phil (27.7%) and Neither (4.3%).

Cramér's V = 0.18. Medium connection.

In year did you discover danisnotonfire/AmazingPhil?/Do you ship phan?

Cramér's V = 0.05 for both danisnotonfire and AmazingPhil. Basically no connection.

Do you prefer individual or joint danisnotonfire and AmazingPhil content?/Do you ship phan?

59.8% of people who prefer joint content ship phan (23.5% do so partially, 3.9% don’t ship it).

45.3% of people who have no content preference ship phan (28.9% do so partially, 6.8% don’t ship it).

31.4% of people who prefer individual content also ship phan (25% do so partially, 18.5% don’t ship it).

Cramér's V = 0.14. Weak connection.

Which channel did you discover first?/Do you ship phan?

53.2% of people who discovered AmazingPhil first ship phan, vs 53.42% of all respondents.

48.7% of people who discovered danisnotonfire first ship phan, vs 53.42% of all respondents .

58% of people who discovered them at the same time ship phan, vs 53.42% of all respondents .

Cramér's V = 0.04 Basically no connection.

Which channel did you discover first?/Which of the following do you think is most likely to describe Dan and Phil’s relationship in real life?

63.2% of people who discovered AmazingPhil first assume some kind of romantic background, vs 50.21% of all respondents.

59.3% of people who discovered danisnotonfire first assume some kind of romantic background, vs 50.21% of all respondents.

63% of people who discovered them at the same time assume a romantic background, vs 50.21% of all respondents.

Cramér's V = 0.04 Basically no connection.

Do you consider yourself to be part of the phandom?/Do you ship phan?

Cramér's V = 0.22. Medium connection.

Which of the following do you think is most likely to describe Dan and Phil’s relationship in real life?/Do you read phanfiction?

84.4% of people who assume some sort of romantic background read phanfiction, 15.6% do not.

59.9% of people who assume some sort of platonic background read phanfiction, 40.5% do not.

Phi = -0.28. Medium correlation.

#correlationresults2017

17 notes · View notes