#key performance indicator calculator

[covid-safer-hotties]

Price to power to size to portability, the AirFanta 3Pro is one of the best on the market. Here's the latest review (Also preserved in our archive)

Afiliate links if you want this guy to make a buck from your purchase: www.amazon.com/stores/AirFanta/page/0D35BA0F-6AFE-48BB-BB83-E984C65192D4?asc_campaign=c192889518f863d96d278a446b3a951d&asc_source=01H1P39M5ZSG9J6WR6B1HBK9M0&language=en_US&linkCode=sl2&linkId=be7b5afa91953d14a40a0b6fb293d6aa&ref_=as_li_ss_tl&tag=namespacebran492-20

air-fanta.com/?dt_id=2137762

AirFanta is a name that I hear more about every day. While it’s a relatively niche company, it’s quickly becoming well-known – at least within the air quality ‘enthusiast’ community – for performant yet affordable air purifiers and air quality monitors. I’ve been using the AirFanta G2 Air Quality Monitor for quite a few months now, but the two products that have always interested me the most are 3Pro and 4Lite air purifiers.

After having the 3Pro set up inside my office for over two weeks now, I am happy to be able to present my full review of the device. For anyone unaware, this purifier is designed to filter a massive amount of air (we will discuss the CADR and more soon!) at a relatively affordable price. It does this by being essentially a pre-assembled CR (Corsi-Rosenthal) Box – a form of air purifier that was itself created due to the need for affordable and effective air purification devices.

While the 3Pro doesn’t embrace the typical DIY aspect of traditional CR Boxes, it has the advantage of having proven performance (no need to worry about whether your DIY box is effective!) and being ready to go out of the box. However, perhaps my favourite aspect of this device over traditional CR Boxes is how easily obtainable it is. While this probably isn’t an issue for anyone in the U.S. or Europe, I find it hard to source good HEPA filters in New Zealand at an affordable price. The 3Pro ensures I don’t run into this issue.

In today’s review of the AirFanta 3Pro, I want to answer a few key questions. Firstly, how does it perform? Secondly, how does it compare to more ‘traditional’ air purifiers? Finally, and most importantly, is the 3Pro worth the markup compared to making your own CR Box at home? By the end of the article, I will share the answers and my opinions regarding each of these questions. Let’s dive in!

The key selling point of the AirFanta 3Pro is its fantastic CADR ��� especially at this price. For anyone new to air purifiers, CADR stands for clean air delivery rate, which indicates how much air an air purifier can clean and deliver in a set period. The measurement typically used for CADR is CFM, or cubic feet per minute. A higher CADR in CFM indicates the purifier delivers more clean air.

CADR is calculated by considering both the filter efficiency and the airflow through the filters, making it a much better metric (and the standard for air purifiers) than airflow alone. Most CADR tests use a room of around 30m3 and test how much faster the purifier removes particles from the air than if they were left to settle naturally without any other influences.

So, what is the CADR of the 3Pro? It is quite impressive, 413cfm (702 m3/h) at full speed. To best put this in perspective, I recommend reading the fantastic HouseFresh review to see how it compares to other devices currently on the market (spoiler alert; it performs very favourably). I also believe these official figures, as multiple other sources have confirmed them.

The AirFanta 3Pro uses HEPA H11 filters, which are rated to provide ≥ 95% filtration. It’s worth noting that while this figure may not seem that high and that while many air purifiers use higher-rated filters, the H11 filters used here aren’t necessarily bad. That is because, unlike respirators and masks, air purifiers are not designed to purify the air as best possible on a single pass. Rather, if an air purifier can continually filter the same air after multiple passes through the filter, the particle count and concentration will be significantly reduced.

This is important to note because H11 filters are less dense, allowing for better airflow and generally with less noise. Compared to masks, you can think of the balance between filtration and breathability – generally, the more filtration a mask or respirator provides, the less breathable it is. The same goes for air purifiers. The key difference here is that purifiers are designed to have air pass through them multiple times, unlike a mask or respirator, which only has one chance to filter the air before the wearer breathes it. This is why, despite having ‘only’ an H11 filter, the 3Pro can achieve a fantastic CADR.

Of course, this is a very simple explanation, but it’s important to clarify this because I can predict many questions asking, ‘But why weren’t better filters such as HEPA H13 filters used?’. While I can’t speak for the exact answer (you’d have to ask Adam from AirFanta about that!), it’s likely to strike a balance between single-pass filtration performance, airflow, and noise level. While we’ll dive into it soon, I believe complaints about the H11 filter will quickly disappear once you see the performance that the AirFanta 3Pro has to offer.

It’s also worth noting that carbon filters are available, which will provide filtration through adsorption for VOCs and many odours. While I didn’t get these filters to test, some people will opt for them to help manage VOCs. Since these add another layer to the filter, they will likely slightly drop the CADR, but probably not enough to make any significant impact (and, of course, the extra filtration is a big benefit).

AirFanta also has a full list of third-party certifications and test results, which can be viewed here. Interestingly, both bacterial efficiency and viral efficiency reports from Guangzhou Institute of Microbiology Group Co., Ltd. (a CNAS-accredited laboratory) have been provided, and both reports show a > 99.99% decrease in particle concentration after 60 minutes of use in a 30m3 room. The bacterial test goes further and shows the results after 15 minutes, 30 minutes, and 45 minutes. These results show a ≥ 95.63%, ≥ 99.91% and 99.99% drop in tested particles, respectively.

These results show that, at least in a room around 30m3 in size, the AirFanta 3Pro can reduce bacterial and viral particles by ≥ 99.9% in 30 minutes, with 60 minutes seeing a near complete removal of such particles. While we can’t tell exactly what size the particles were in this testing (at least not without paying for access to the original standards), these results are very promising. Potentially worth noting is that since the 3Pro is rated for 702 m3/h, there would have been around 23 air changes within one hour in the 30m3 test chamber. Therefore, the ≥ 95.63% is after almost six air changes, and ≥ 99.91% after around 12.

Of course, these tests and the stated CADR are at the device’s maximum fan speed, which isn’t ideal in many situations. While it’s important to know a device’s maximum performance when needed, it’s more likely you’ll want to leave the device running at a lower speed either all the time or at least quite regularly. Below are the stated CADRs at different fan speeds:

6 – 413CFM 5 – 374CFM 4 – 321CFM 3 – 247CFM 2 – 141CFM 1 – 57CFM Of course, I was also curious to run some tests myself, but I must make the disclaimer that my tests are far from scientific. That said, I wanted to perform some testing similar to a real-life setting where the AirFanta 3Pro is likely to be used. As such, I decided to set up a test room. I measured this room to be 25.6m3, which is about the size of a standard bedroom (it is a bedroom!). While this room is smaller than what I believe this device is intended for, it’s the most controllable room in my house regarding airflow as it only has one door and one window, which can easily be closed and no other forms of ventilation or air disturbances.

In this room, I burned incense until I reached a PM2.5 concentration of 500ug/m3. However, since I can’t exactly control the PM concentration, it ended up being somewhere between 500 and 600 in my tests. I then put the incense out and did a control test to see how long it took the particles to settle without any assistance at all. This took around 90 minutes, and I used this as my baseline.

I monitored the particle concentrations with five AirGradient monitors that were located in each corner and the centre of the room. I then reran this experiment three more times – once with the purifier at maximum speed, once at half speed, and once at the minimum speed to see how long the concentration took to reach < 5ug/m3. I measured the particle concentration by averaging the data from all five monitors to ensure the whole room had been filtered. Here are my results.

In this graph, you can see the baseline data in blue (labelled Ambient) and the particle concentration drop from the AirFanta 3Pro at maximum speed (speed 6) in red. As you can see, it took around 90 minutes for the particle count to drop to < 5ug/m3 without the purifier running but less than 20 minutes with the device at maximum speed. I was very impressed by these first results, and while I wouldn’t want to run the device at full speed often as it is loud, I appreciate having a good peak performance for times when you need to clean the air in a room quickly.

I reran this test, but this time with the 3Pro at half speed (speed 3) and was impressed by the relatively low performance drop. I was worried my results were incorrect, and I reran this three times, but each result was within one minute of the initial result. It looks like a large chunk of the device’s performance is retained between the higher speeds, even though the noise level decreases significantly. This gave me high hopes for the 3Pro’s performance at minimum speed.

Unfortunately, but perhaps not unexpectedly, the device performed far worse at the lowest speed (speed 1). While the particle concentration did drop more quickly than without the device, it was vastly slower than at the faster speeds. It is worth noting that this is not bad at all, as the device is very quiet at this speed and we can see the performance is clearly there, if needed, just turn the device to a higher speed. However, I had inflated hopes after seeing the great performance at higher speeds. Of course, this does match with the stated speed 1 CADR which is roughly 1/8 of the maximum CADR at speed 6.

If we add the times it took the 3Pro to reduce the PM concentration to below 5ug/m3 at each speed setting, we can see that it took between 17.3 minutes and 80.1 minutes to clean the room, depending on the speed. Interestingly, between the higher speeds (speeds 3-6), there appears to be little performance drop-off but a significant improvement in noise levels. At the slow end, the device takes a long time to filter the room, and if you want to use these near-silent speeds, you will probably want to have the device constantly on.

It’s worth noting that previously, the AirFanta 3Pro came with a voltage dial on the adapter. This could be used to adjust the speed, and many reviews of the device still refer to this voltage dial (essentially, a speed dial). Newer versions come with a speed dial with speeds 1-6, so I have referred to speeds instead of voltages for this section.

Before concluding this section, I was also curious how this device would perform if I lit incense in the room while the air purifier was on. I didn’t have a reason for doing this other than curiosity. Still, considering the stellar performance at the higher fan speeds, I wondered how the purifier would handle a pollutant source emitting particles while the device was running. Below, you can see the results (keeping in mind that this same room reaches over 1000ug/m3 when burning incense without an air purifier).

As you can see, the AirFanta 3Pro significantly reduced the maximum particle concentration in the room and rapidly cleaned the air once the incense finished burning. I would be very confident using a device such as this even during periods of heavy pollution, such as during wildfire season.

Overall, I’m quite impressed with the performance of the AirFanta 3Pro, and although it’s loud at full speed, it’s great to know that it’s more than capable of cleaning a small to medium-sized room quickly when needed. Larger rooms will take longer to filter, but I am confident this device can do it based on this performance.

If you prefer a quieter device, you can still use the AirFanta 3Pro, but you will want to leave it at a lower speed and constantly have it on. Thankfully, at the lower speeds, it’s a relatively quiet device, and I found it easy to work even with the purifier constantly on – as long as it was set to a lower speed, such as 1 or 2.

On the certifications page (located here), AirFanta also discloses and publically makes its results from non-performance-related certifications publicly available. There are a few pertinent and important documents here, so let’s discuss these before moving on. For the 3Pro, we can find the following documents provided:

UL507 certificate of AirFanta 3Pro CE-EMC certificate of AirFanta 3Pro and 4Lite CE-LVD certificate of AirFanta 3Pro and 4Lite FCC certificate of AirFanta 3Pro and 4Lite California Air Resources Board certification of Airfanta 3Pro Let’s review these individually, beginning with the UL507 certificate at the top. This certification might seem minor, but this is a safety standard for low and mid-powered fans such as those in PCs, kitchen hood vents, and, obviously, some air purifiers. The documentation for this certification is extensive (around 200 pages long), but this certification ensures the fans on the 3Pro are safe from a range of potential issues.

The next two certifications, both CE certificates from the European Union, indicate that the device meets EMC (electromagnetic compatibility) and LVD (low voltage directive) requirements. These are essentially further safety tests and indicate that the device is safe and provides high protection from potential EMC and LVD dangers.

The FCC certificate shows that the AirFanta 3Pro complies with FCC requirements, which are pertinent to customers from the United States. Still, these certifications are also helpful for trust-building with global customers. While I’m not U.S.-based, I certainly feel more confident in a product if it’s also FCC-compliant.

Finally, the CARB (California Air Resources Board) certification shows that the AirFanta 3Pro complies with California’s electrical safety and ozone requirements. This is particularly important as ozone can be a big issue with some air purifiers, and it’s reassuring to know that this is not an issue in the case of the AirFanta 3Pro.

If you’ve ever seen a CR Box, you will already know exactly what to expect from the 3Pro because that’s exactly what it is – a CR Box with pre-chosen parts that come as one ready-to-assemble package. While CR boxes aren’t that hard to assemble, the 3Pro streamlines the process and removes the difficulty of selecting and choosing your own parts. While some enthusiasts might opt for another CR Box, many other prospective customers will appreciate this approach.

When you open the 3Pro’s box, you will be met with six ‘layers’ that must be assembled. This is a very clean approach, as it means that the packaging for the device is relatively compact (albeit still quite heavy), and it even means that the device can be transported and reassembled easily. While it would be a stretch to call this device portable (that’s what the AirFanta 4Lite and SmartAir QT3 are for!), this means it is far more compact than other air purifiers with similar CADRs. While it is still quite large, you could easily take it on the road and use it at hotels, or perhaps even fly with it if you are taking large suitcases.

Back to actually assembling the product! Once you open the box, you will see six panels layered on top of one another. These are the cube’s six sides, with four being HEPA filters, one being a solid plastic base for the device, and the final being the top, where the four fans are located. Assembling the device is easy, and you will want to place the base on the ground before slotting the four filters into it. The only potential difficulty with assembling this purifier is holding the four sides in place as you slot the top on, but even this is quite straightforward with the included velcro intended for exactly this purpose.

A manual is included, but the device is so easy to put together and take apart that I can’t imagine anyone ever using it past the first assembly. Even then, it’s not really needed, as assembling the device is quite self-explanatory. The only note I think might be important to the user is that the mesh surface on the filters should be facing outwards (not the filtering surface, which should face inwards).

All of this is to say that assembling the device is very straightforward, and no one should be scared away or turned off this device because it has a small DIY element. It’s also a bit easier to assemble than other CR boxes as the slots have already been cut out of the base plate, and everything can be put together without the need for glue, tape, or other materials. Perhaps more helpful, the filters have already been chosen, and there is no need to shop around for the best price-performance filter.

Once assembled, the device takes the shape of quite a compact CR Box. On top of that, I must add that I think this device also looks a lot better than any traditional CR Box – at least any that I’ve ever made! While it still has an industrial look, it’s a device that could quite easily fit into a classroom, office, or room without attracting too much attention. While I value aesthetics much less than performance, I appreciate having a device that looks good, too – especially if it can blend in.

Once assembled, the device feels quite solid, and despite there being no adhesive or tape used in the assembly of the purifier, I feel confident lifting it and moving it without dislodging the pieces. With that said, I tend to lift the device from the bottom and hold the top down to ensure none of the pieces slide out from their intended positions.

On top of the purifier are four large fans connected to a controller that will allow you to adjust the speed of the device. These fans look almost identical to large PC fans, and they’re held in place by a wire bracket that also serves as an extra layer of protection to stop any children or animals from getting fingers or paws into the fans. That said, if you have the device around children, you may want to place it up higher so they can’t easily reach the fans.

That’s really all there is to the design of this device. It’s very simple, but it’s also affordable and performant. While some might miss the smart features and connectivity of more pricey air purifiers, the two types of devices cater to very different customers. Overall, I’m a fan of this straightforward approach, which reminds me of the SmartAir Sqair.

The AirFanta 3Pro uses four 140mm fans to push air through the filters. Characteristically, smaller fans tend to have higher-pitched sounds than larger fans and the AirFanta 3Pro sits somewhere in the middle as it uses medium-sized fans. If you have a desktop PC with a case fan (not the other fans, such as the higher-pitched CPU fan), you’ll likely already know what these fans sound like, as most desktop cases use 120mm or 140mm fans. This isn’t an unpleasant sound, but it is quite audible.

To see how loud the AirFanta 3Pro is, I conducted noise tests at 30cm and 2 metres with a sound level metre that measures in dBA (A-weighted decibel). dBA differs from traditional dB because it is adjusted for the human ear’s sensitivity to different frequencies. Low and very high frequencies are de-emphasized, mimicking how humans perceive loudness. In other words, it’s a better representation of the actual noise level than dB for a device such as an air purifier. However, I do want to note this as many other websites use dB, which will explain why my results are significantly different.

For further context, here are a few examples of the volumes of some noises in dBA. Obviously, these can vary, and especially with dBA, they will vary between different devices. However, they are rough examples:

10 dBA – Breathing or leaves rustling: Extremely quiet. 30 dBA – Whispering: Comparable to a quiet library. 40 dBA – Refrigerator hum: A typical low background noise. 50 dBA – Moderate rainfall: Light, soothing noise. 60 dBA – Normal conversation: The sound of talking at a close distance. 70 dBA – Vacuum cleaner: Considered moderate noise, can be annoying over time. 80 dBA – Heavy traffic or a loud alarm clock: Noise becomes uncomfortable after prolonged exposure. As you can see, at the lowest speeds, the 3Pro doesn’t add much to the noise of most rooms, but at the highest speeds, it can sound almost as loud as a vacuum cleaner (provided you are close to it). This is a lot of variation, but I like how this device gives the user full control over speed and noise, allowing them to pick a good balance.

I think most people will have this device running on speed 2 or 3, and both sounds are very manageable at a distance. If you do want a short burst of cleaning, the device will be significantly louder, and that’s why I only recommend using the higher speeds when needed.

When it comes to power consumption, the device can go from very low power to relatively high power. Here is a list of the wattage and voltage at each fan speed:

6 – 33.2 watt – 12v 5 – 27.4 watt – 11v 4 – 18.9 watt – 9.3v 3 – 11.1 watt – 7.3v 2 – 4.7 watt – 4.8v 1 – 2.2 watt – 3.0v I won’t dive into power costs here because those vary greatly depending on where you reside, but I hope these specifications can give some insights. What’s most impressive to me is how much range this device has, whether we are discussing volume or power draw. There is such a large range that you can choose exactly what setting works best for you and leave the device to it.

The AirFanta 3Pro costs $149 or $159 (USD) depending on whether you opt for the CE-certified or CARB-certified version (the CARB variant is the lower priced of the two). It’s surprising to see a different price on these two units, but I assume it’s due to extra costs, either with the CE certification or getting the device into Europe. Either way, if you’re in the U.S. (or any non-EU country), the CARB variant will work, and that’s the model I received.

In the box, you will get six panels to assemble the 3Pro. This includes four HEPA H11 filters, which, as per AirFanta, should be good to last 6-12 months, depending on air quality conditions. In most cases, I would assume these filters will last closer to 12 months, but those who experience severe wildfire seasons or whose homes are exposed to consistent year-round pollution may need to replace the filters more regularly.

When you need your first filter replacement, you can opt for the default H11 filters or H11 filters with activated carbon. Interestingly, it doesn’t seem you can choose the filters you get with the device initially. If you want activated carbon filters from the get-go, you must purchase the device alongside an extra pack of filters. The activated carbon filters will set you back $74.99 compared to the basic filters, which cost $54.

The filters aren’t cheap, but it’s important to remember that each filter replacement pack you order has four individual filters, which is a substantial amount of filter materials. It’s also important to note that, unfortunately, you will need to purchase official AirFanta filters as they are smaller than most square HEPA filters, and other filters will not fit on this device. I don’t think this is a big deal, as I appreciate the smaller form factor of this device over larger devices, and even four HEPA filters from other brands will not be cheap.

If we estimate that most users use each set of filters for around nine months, your yearly filter costs for non-activated carbon filters will be $67.5. On the other hand, if you opt for the extra VOC adsorption of the carbon filters, you are looking at an ongoing cost of just under $100 per year. This is in a similar price range to other equally performant air purifiers, and this device’s initial cost is also much lower.

While power cost also needs to be factored into the ongoing cost equation, that cost will vary significantly depending on your air purifier usage (hours, speed, etc) and location. However, regardless of usage patterns, you should plan to spend between $67 and $100 on replacement filters for this device every year.

Overall, I’ve been very happy with the AirFanta 3Pro. While it’s not a perfect air purifier – if one even exists – this is a fantastic device that balances many difficult factors. Ultimately, it comes in as an affordable air purifier that doesn’t skimp on performance. In fact, it has a higher CADR than many more (and much more) expensive air purifiers. Furthermore, it offers a wide range of speeds that allow the user to choose the ideal balance between speed and sound for the setting.

I’ve always been a fan of the CR box concept, but I think the AirFanta 3Pro takes this a step further and, due to this, will appeal to many more people. While I’ve never had an issue constructing CR boxes, I often have difficulty sourcing the parts (especially good filters), and I appreciate how the 3Pro can provide the same or better performance at a slightly higher price while also simplifying the shopping process for me.

Surprisingly, for a device of this size, it’s also quite portable, and you will be hard-pressed to find anything that provides a higher CADR than this device while also being ‘packable’. While I still wouldn’t go so far as to say it can fit in a backpack, it can definitely fit in a car or suitcase and is ideal for longer trips where you might be staying in hotels with unknown air quality. If, on the other hand, you want to use it around the house, it’s also a great device.

The biggest disadvantages I see with the AirFanta 3Pro are the sound and the design. There’s no denying that while the device is powerful, it’s also loud at its higher speeds. While this isn’t unusual for an air purifier, it is worth noting that you probably won’t want to run this device at its higher speeds unless necessary. I usually find myself using speed 2 or 3, which is the sweet spot for most users. On the upside, the lower speeds are almost silent, and although they significantly diminish performance, they are good for users who are okay with constantly running the device.

The design may also bug some users. While I don’t mind (and actually like) the device’s industrial design, I know some people don’t use CR boxes due to the design. If you don’t like the look of CR boxes, the chances are you also won’t like the design of this device. With that said, this design allows this device to have such a good price-to-performance ratio, and I think many potential customers will appreciate this more.

Overall, the AirFanta 3Pro is a cost-effective air purifier that should be on your radar – especially if price is a concern. If you’ve tried the 3Pro, I would love to hear your thoughts, so please feel free to use the comments section below! Furthermore, if you have any remaining questions, please don’t hesitate to as,k and I will do my best to reply. Thank you for reading.

Pros: High CADR (413 cfm) for effective air purification Affordable compared to similar high-performance devices Pre-assembled CR box design simplifies setup Portable and compact for travel use Certified for safety (UL507, CE-EMC, FCC, CARB) Cons: Loud at higher speeds Design may not appeal to all users (industrial look) Limited to proprietary filters, increasing costs No activated carbon filters included in basic kit

[gallifreyinstituteforlearning]

⚕️GASS (Gallifreyan Assessment Scoring System)

Sick Gallifreyan just crossed your path? Here's how to assess their condition using the Gallifreyan Assessment Scoring System. Just remember, 'Gallifreyan life's a GASS'.

BIGGER - Google Drive: PDF / Image JPG / Image PNG

This guide is for use on Gallifreyans and Time Lords only. Always seek your human advice from human health providers.

✨ What is GASS?

The Gallifreyan Assessment Scoring System (GASS) is a tool designed to rapidly evaluate a Gallifreyan's condition. By monitoring vital signs and unique Gallifreyan indicators, it prioritises emergency responses while accounting for their distinct physiology, such as dual hearts and regenerative abilities.

Just remember, Gallifreyan life's a GASS.

📈 What's New in GASS?

This updated version of GASS includes critical refinements for more precise assessments. New categories have been added, such as Heart Rate Differential (HRD) to flag discrepancies between the two hearts and T = Responds to Telepathy in the level of consciousness scale. Adjustments to thresholds for vital signs and regenerative glow visibility also improve detection of emergencies like fibrillation or post-regenerative trauma.

📝 How to Use GASS

1️⃣Initial Observations

Ensure the environment is safe (e.g., no stray Daleks).

Observe for immediate signs of distress: skin colour, breathing effort, or lack of responsiveness.

2️⃣Evaluate Vital Signs and Assign Scores

Refer to the GASS table to assess each category:

🌬️ Respiration Rate: Count breaths per minute. Adjust for respiratory bypass if present.

🫧 Supplemental Oxygen: Note if oxygen support is in use.

🌡️ Temperature: Measure orally.

💓 Systolic BP: Record using a normal sphygmomanometer.

💖 Hearts Rate (Combined): Count the total bpm across both hearts.

🔄 Hearts Rhythm: Sequential beats (thud-thud, thud-thud) are normal; synchronous beats (thud-thud together) indicate fibrillation.

⚖️ Heart Rate Differential (HRD): Calculate the bpm difference between hearts; large discrepancies suggest possible singular heart failure.

🧠 Level of Consciousness (AVPTU): A = Alert, V = Responds to verbal stimuli, P = Responds to pain, T = Responds to telepathy, U = Unresponsive

✨ Regenerative Glow: Check for visible energy on the skin.

3️⃣Check for Healing Coma

If 8+ healing coma criteria are met:

Cease active interventions.

Monitor closely for changes.

Avoid premature waking to prevent neurological damage.

4️⃣Calculate Total GASS Score

Add up the scores from all categories:

0: No concerning changes. Continue routine monitoring.

1–4: Mild to moderate changes. Perform an ABCDE assessment and increase monitoring.

5–8 or 3 in single score: Severe changes. Perform ABCDE, escalate care, and consider sepsis.

≥9 or Glow = 3: Extreme changes. Initiate emergency intervention, constant monitoring, and prepare for sepsis protocols.

5️⃣Reassess After Interventions

Following each intervention, reassess the GASS score to adapt care and ensure stability.

🚨 When to Escalate

Critical signs: Synchronous heartbeats, extreme HRD, or GASS score ≥9.

Sepsis or Specific Emergencies: Use respective protocols for management.

📌 Key Points to Remember

Combine GASS results with clinical judgement.

Healing comas are protective states—let them run their course.

Escalate care if in doubt.

Medical Guides These are all practical guides to assessing and treating a Gallifreyan in an emergency or medical setting.

⚕️💕Gallifreyan CPR

⚕️👽Gallifreyan Assessment Scoring System (GASS)

⚕️👽ABCDE Assessment

⚕️⚠️Sepsis Emergency Response (SER)

⚕️⚠️Severe Trauma Protocol

⚕️🌡️Gallifreyan Thermoregulation and Emergency Response

⚕️🔮Psionic Emergency Pathways

⚕️✨Post-Regeneration Management

⚕️💤Gallifreyan Healing Coma Management

⚕️🩸Interpreting Gallifreyan Bloodwork

⚕️👶Gallifreyan Paediatric Emergencies

Any orange text is educated guesswork or theoretical. More content ... →📫Got a question? | 📚Complete list of Q+A and factoids →📢Announcements |🩻Biology |🗨️Language |🕰️Throwbacks |🤓Facts → Features:⭐Guest Posts | 🍜Chomp Chomp with Myishu →🫀Gallifreyan Anatomy and Physiology Guide (pending) →⚕️Gallifreyan Emergency Medicine Guides →📝Source list (WIP) →📜Masterpost If you're finding your happy place in this part of the internet, feel free to buy a coffee to help keep our exhausted human conscious. She works full-time in medicine and is so very tired 😴

[andypantsx3]

hi andie!

do u have any tips for corporate girlies? my friend is starting out in the corp world !! and got a lot of reality checks over how harsh and 'corporate' it is :((

Ohhhhh my god yeah corporate culture sucks!! It's just a bunch of adult babies using fancy words tbh lmao, acting like we're going to war and/or curing cancer when we're really just launching a product no one wants or needs lol.

Not sure what industry your friend is or what role she's in but here are some general tips, starting with practical project tips to more personal/sanity check tips lol.

Make sure you understand your organization's goals and success criteria. This is so basic but in order to understand what leadership cares about and how all the different project components fit in, you're going to want to learn what are all the active projects, who owns them, what success is being evaluated on, and how those performance indicators are being calculated. I work with some people who have no idea what is going on (which, fair) but it ends up creating a ton of churn and can look super bad for them if they are not in step with what our corporate overlords expect from them.

Clear communication is key. Never have I ever encountered more communication issues than working in corporate; people often have one image in their head of what a task looks like where their partner teams might have another, and if you don't outline all the key details together, you could end up delivering something unusable. If you're an individual contributor (aka a task doer), make sure you ask clarifying questions of the project leads if they haven't specified (like, what testing environment something needs to be deployed to, what are the release gating procedures, what is the expected timeline, etc). If you're a project manager, make sure you're clarifying those details with stakeholders and passing that information to your team; prompt your team to ask questions even if they seem clear, and make sure you get that info for them ASAP!!

Documentation is crucial. If you make an implementation decision, document it. If you have a delivery, document it. If you have a process for anything, make sure you document it. If you have a meeting, get those notes out. If you have an agreement with stakeholders, make sure you get it in writing and get them to sign off on it!! Information is key to helping other people understand what you are doing, why you are doing it, what the expectations were from other related parties when you started doing it, and how it can be improved if needed. If you're a project lead or manager, start a folder or repository somewhere for all project communications, keep all your emails & slacks with stakeholders (because they will come back being snotheads and you can politely whip out receipts). :3

Be proactive. Observe the kinds of questions leadership asks, understand their concerns & needs. Then proactively make sure you are addressing those things in your work and/or in your reporting. For example, if you're reporting on a release failure in a weekly business review, make sure you call out things like: 1) what you tried to do to prevent failure, 2) what the ultimate blockers or root causes of failure were, 3) what your learnings were from that failure, 4) what you are going to do to fix it, and 5) what the revised ETA is. That way, even though things didn't go your way, leadership understands you are on top of things and proactively working to solve problems.

Understand priorities & tradeoffs. There will come a time where you have conflicting demands on your time. Work with your manager or org leadership to understand what projects are higher priorities than others, and do not be afraid to escalate to your manager or above if progress is threatened or if you need to clarify. For example, Project A is high priority and Project B is medium priority, but the project manager from Project B is all up in your business asking you to deliver something or investigate something that you don't know if you have time for. Loop in your manager to determine if someone else can take Project B, or inform them that doing B will impose these anticipated risks to A; are they comfortable with that? Then you can circle back to Project B to deliver the news that you're working on A, your manager has suggested this revised timeline or other POC they can work with, and if they have concerns they can escalate. (Usually this shuts ppl up :3)

Improve processes. I cannot emphasize this enough but try to think about how to do things better the next time around, even if things went solidly to plan. Do not get defensive about your work or the quality of your work; always be thinking (or asking other people) about how time could be cut off of something, what processes could be put in place to minimize touchpoints or decrease risks. If you can, try to impose this mindset on your team & ask for project retrospectives, and take specific action items out of those retrospectives! Trust me it makes things so much clearer and easier in the long run if you work to make things better over time!!

Get a mentor. Find someone who has the job you want to have or who seems to know the things you want to know about and ask them to work with you on that! Tell them what your goal is, whether to develop a special skill set to move roles, or develop a specific understanding of a project or concept, and ask them to help you develop a plan to get there. Set up regular time together and goals to work towards in that time. This helps you learn things faster and gives you someone who can vouch for you when it comes time for yearly feedback, role changes, or promotions.

Create a personal portfolio. Keep track of all the things that you do; all the projects you are on, what your role is, what you were responsible for delivering, and what resources you created as part of that, whether it's project wikis, some script, etc. Keep your manager aware of it so they understand your value and have visibility on your work; you can leverage this when it comes time for role changes or promotions. Additionally try to make sure you're working on high viz or high value projects; this gives you even more leverage!!

Do not tie your self worth to your performance or your job title. At the end of the day capitalism sucks, corporations are evil, and none of this shit matters. Even if you don't do something well once, you can improve in the future, and even if your company doesn't see it/isn't a good match for your skills, you have value!!! They profit from keeping you underpaid, stressed out, and dejected, but you are not just a 'resource' or a cog in a machine. You are a person; you will make missteps from time to time but you bring more value to this planet and the people on it just by existing than these capitalist enterprises could ever. Do do not burn yourself out trying to please them, keep yourself open to other job options, and make sure you have a good friend/family support structure in place to reality check you!!

Idk how helpful this was but I hope there was a little something in there that your friend could use. If she has specific questions on anything I'm happy to help out too lol; that might give me more idea what specific aspect she is struggling with & how to help!

[hetalia-club]

Got Bored And Made An Entire Hetalia Baseball League (HBL)

the league is meant to have fictitious and near impossible goals for regular humans to achieve. They are all scaled beside each other accounting for superhuman strength.

~Canada's Stats~

Canada's batting average: Regular Season: .287 Projected: .291 Career: .313

Running Speed MPH- 13-14 mph Hitting power- 85-90 mph Regular Season Stolen Bases: 40 Career Stolen Bases: 450

Canada would be a solid, well-rounded player who is highly consistent and reliable. He would be known for his ability to contribute both offensively and defensively, maintaining a high level of performance throughout his career. His balanced hitting profile and good plate discipline would make him a key player in any lineup. Though he might not always stand out in terms of flashy plays, his steady and dependable nature would make him a beloved and respected member of the team. Overall, Canada would be considered a very good player, appreciated for his consistent contributions and team-first attitude.

Tsunami Titans- link to their team and positions

Other Players: (will update with link as they are added) America Russia Sweden England Ireland Iceland Canada Denmark Turkey France Scotland Greece Germany Japan Nyo!America Prussia China Nyo!England Spain Austria Italy Norway Romano Finland

Canada's breakdown below >> (Chat GTP helped with this part because I'm not good at describing things or sports talk)((it also made me the lay out above I made the stats and it put them in MLB format for me & calculated batting average because math :/ ))

Considerations for Canada’s Stats:

Character Traits and Personality:

Kind and Reliable: Canada is known for his gentle and reliable nature, suggesting he would be a consistent and dependable player.

Quiet and Overlooked: Often overshadowed, Canada might not always be the star player, but he contributes significantly and reliably.

Balanced Stat Distribution:

Regular Season:

Games Played (GP): 162, indicating he is a regular and dependable player.

At-Bats (AB): 540, showing consistent involvement in the lineup.

Runs (R): 80, reflecting a solid contribution to the team's scoring.

Hits (H): 155, indicating a strong batting average.

Doubles (2B): 25, Triples (3B): 5, Home Runs (HR): 20, showing a balanced hitting profile with some power.

RBI: 70, demonstrating an ability to drive in runs.

Walks (BB): 50, Strikeouts (SO)**: 85, reflecting good plate discipline and contact skills.

Projected:

Slight improvements across the board to reflect continued growth and consistency.

Career:

Games Played (GP): 2000, reflecting a long and productive career.

At-Bats (AB): 6700, showing sustained participation and consistency.

Runs (R): 1050, Hits (H): 2100, Doubles (2B): 340, Triples (3B): 90, Home Runs (HR): 260.

RBI: 1100, indicating a consistent ability to contribute to the team’s offense.

Walks (BB): 650, Strikeouts (SO)**: 1000, showing excellent plate discipline over his career.

Summary:

Regular Season: Canada’s stats reflect his consistent, reliable, and balanced nature, making him a productive player.

Projected: Small improvements in key areas such as hits, runs, and home runs to reflect potential for continued growth.

Career: Cumulative stats that highlight a long, consistent, and productive career, aligning with his reliable and steady character.

Player Analysis: Canada

Consistent and Reliable:

Games Played (GP): Consistently playing a full season (162 games) indicates that Canada is a reliable and durable player. He shows up for his team day in and day out.

At-Bats (AB): With a high number of at-bats (540-550 per season), Canada is regularly featured in the lineup, showcasing his importance to the team.

Balanced Hitter:

Batting Average: With a batting average around .287 to .313, Canada is a consistent hitter who can be relied upon to get on base frequently.

Hits (H): Averaging around 155-160 hits per season, Canada demonstrates the ability to maintain a strong presence at the plate.

Extra-Base Hits: With a balanced distribution of doubles, triples, and home runs, Canada shows versatility and the ability to hit for power as well as contact.

Team Player:

Runs (R) and RBI: Scoring around 80-85 runs and driving in 70-75 RBIs per season, Canada contributes significantly to his team's offensive production, both in scoring and in bringing teammates home.

Walks (BB) and Strikeouts (SO): With a good number of walks and a moderate strikeout rate, Canada shows discipline at the plate, indicating a strong understanding of the strike zone and patience.

Long-term Contributor:

Career Stats: Accumulating over 2000 games, 2100 hits, and 1100 RBIs over his career, Canada would be viewed as a dependable and productive player over the long term.

[secretofpandora]

🦴 FILE #ENVY-038: “FRACTURE”

📝 BASIC INFORMATION

Subject Name: [REDACTED] Known Alias: Fracture Callsign: Fracture Status: ACTIVE Affiliation: Pandora Division: Envy Faceclaim: Andrew Koji Date of Birth: [REDACTED] Age: 38 Place of Origin: [REDACTED] Sex / Gender: Male (He/Him) Mutation Type: Osteokinesis Recruitment Date: 3 years ago Sexual Orientation: [REDACTED] Alignment Profile: [TRUE NEUTRAL — CLASSIFIED]

💪 PHYSICAL INFORMATION

Height: 5'11" (180 cm) Build: Lean, muscular, and exceptionally agile; every part of his body is trained for speed and precision rather than brute force. Complexion: Light-medium with slight scarring from training and mutation-induced stress Hair: Black, short, and often kept slightly tousled Facial Hair: None Body Hair: Minimal — regularly groomed. Light hair along chest and forearms, but otherwise smooth. Distinguishing Features: Sharp eyes, angular jawline, intense presence; mutation has slightly altered the density of his skeletal structure Tattoos: None visible. Psychological profile suggests avoidance of permanent self-marking. Any past ink (if present) would likely be removed or hidden due to his covert lifestyle.

Subject presumed deceased by all civilian records. Recovered and recruited following Operation Scorpion’s Son. Now functions under the codename “Fracture.” Considered a high-value asset with high tactical value and low social dependency. Handle with awareness of emotional detachment and calculated aggression.

🔬 ABILITY OVERVIEW

Primary Mutation: Osteokinesis Subject has full control over their skeletal structure and can manipulate bone both internally and externally—creating weapons, armor, or using terrain-based calcium structures in combat. They have demonstrated remarkable pain tolerance and rapid healing from skeletal injuries. Secondary Traits: — Master martial artist trained from early childhood — High-level blade proficiency and improvised weapon combat — Psychological resistance to coercion, interrogation, and manipulation Limitations: — Excessive use of mutation causes strain on cardiovascular and muscular systems — Bone regrowth requires protein-heavy recovery — Risk of mutation destabilization under extreme emotional duress

🧠 TACTICAL PROFILE

Division Expertise:

Intimidation

Marksmanship

Selected Expertise:

Acrobatics & Evasion

Proficiencies:

Close Combat Mastery

Stealth & Infiltration

Pain Tolerance

Sleight of Hand

Insight

Deficiencies:

Culture & Politics

Performance

⚙️ EQUIPMENT & SUIT DESIGN

Standard Loadout: Fracture’s suit is a reinforced, matte black tactical body suit designed for agility and silent movement. It features segmented armor plating that enhances flexibility without sacrificing durability. The overall structure is minimal in bulk, focusing on precision over brute protection. Key Features: — High-density plating over the chest, forearms, and knees for protection without restricting movement — Sculpted shoulder guards and vambraces made of sharpened, bone-textured armor—mirroring his mutation’s aesthetic — A skeletal-style half mask conceals his identity while evoking the shape of a skull, enhancing intimidation and psychological warfare — Reinforced boots designed for stealth and grip — Integrated utility belt with compartmentalized pouches for field tools and mission gear The suit is visually intimidating yet functional, blending elements of traditional combat gear with the haunting imagery of Fracture’s mutation. No external markings, emblems, or division insignia—only the silent presence of his codename matters.

📂 FIELD NOTES — BACKGROUND PROFILE

Subject was born to a high-ranking Yakuza patriarch and a civilian mother whose death was long recorded as an accident. From birth, subject was treated more as a legacy weapon than a child—trained in combat disciplines, obedience, and silence. By adolescence, he had already carried out assignments under family direction. Pandora’s intelligence reports indicate subject uncovered that his mother’s death had not been accidental. Medical records, quietly sealed by the clan, revealed injuries consistent with blunt-force trauma. The instigator: the father. Following this revelation, subject broke rank, compiling and anonymously submitting evidence of multiple criminal operations—effectively dismantling key factions of the organization. He was detained by international authorities but was not under arrest nor facing charges at the time of extraction. Authorities offered witness protection. A new name. A quiet life far from the blood and violence. He hesitated. Not because he didn’t want to disappear—but because he didn’t want to vanish powerless. Pandora offered him a different kind of disappearance. One that came with strength. One that came with purpose. And Fracture said yes. His two-year training was marked by precision and silence. He didn’t bond with anyone. Didn’t break. Didn’t speak unless spoken to. When he was deemed ready, the serum was administered—and the mutation nearly killed him. His bones grew faster than his body could handle. His marrow hardened. He felt every shift like a scream in his skeleton. But he endured. Three years later, Fracture operates with surgical focus. He's a ghost with a blade. An interrogator who never raises his voice. A weapon without unnecessary movement. He doesn’t kill for revenge. He doesn’t kill for orders. He kills because he knows how—and because it gets results. He never says her name. But everything he does is for the woman the world forgot.

🔒 [CLASSIFIED: LEVEL 7 CLEARANCE REQUIRED]

Unofficial Agent Notes — Subject: Fracture The following details are not part of the official Pandora record and are restricted to internal psychological and biometric files.

Subject exhibits signs of emotional compartmentalization; uses physical exertion as a primary outlet. Highly disciplined but shows subtle signs of tension release through controlled violence or intimacy.

Biometric scans indicate exceptional muscle density with minimal fat retention. Estimated 7.75 inches, cut, described as proportionate and symmetrical.

Subject’s sexual behavior is rare but intentional, governed by strict personal boundaries and an underlying need for trust. Contrary to earlier projections, subject demonstrates a submissive-leaning temperament in intimate engagements, finding release in surrendering control to trusted partners. While versatile in position, capable of both topping and bottoming, subject instinctively responds to being led rather than leading, favoring partners who provide structure and clear direction.

Fracture displays heightened responsiveness to control-based dynamics, including restraint, impact play, and permission-based escalation. Subtle cues—such as controlled breathing, maintained eye contact, and tension held at the edge of release—indicate internalized focus on obedience and restraint. Praise for compliance and endurance triggers favorable psychological responses, reinforcing desired behavior.

Subject does not initiate encounters unless trust is firmly established, remaining guarded yet intensely receptive once boundaries are respected. Known to engage in intimacy infrequently, but with deep physical engagement when trust conditions are met.

No romantic affiliations noted. Displays a high degree of bodily awareness, often using silence or eye contact in lieu of verbal cues.

FILE STATUS: OPEN LAST UPDATED: [REDACTED]

[antutu-benchmark]

Antutu Benchmark Comprehensive Guide to Understanding and Using It

Introduction

Antutu Benchmark is one of the most popular and widely used performance testing tools for smartphones and other devices. It provides a detailed score based on multiple tests that measure CPU, GPU, memory, and user experience performance. Whether you’re a tech enthusiast, a buyer comparing devices, or a developer optimizing apps, Antutu Benchmark offers valuable insights into device capabilities.

What is Antutu Benchmark?

Definition and Purpose Antutu Benchmark is an app that runs a series of tests on your device to evaluate its overall performance. It assesses different components like the processor, graphics, memory speed, and user interface fluidity to generate a comprehensive score. This score helps users compare devices and understand their strengths and weaknesses.

Why Use Antutu Benchmark? Using Antutu Benchmark is important because it provides an objective, standardized way to measure device performance. It helps consumers make informed decisions when purchasing smartphones, tablets, or other gadgets and helps manufacturers optimize hardware and software.

How Does Antutu Benchmark Work?

Key Testing Areas Antutu performs tests in several categories including CPU performance (calculations and multitasking), GPU performance (graphics rendering and gaming), memory speed (RAM and storage performance), and user experience (smoothness of operation).

Score Calculation After running all tests, Antutu combines results into a single score. Higher scores mean better overall performance. This score is often used to rank devices in performance charts and reviews.

Benefits of Using Antutu Benchmark

Device Comparison Made Easy With Antutu Benchmark, you can compare scores of different devices to find which performs better in real-world scenarios.

Helps Identify Bottlenecks By breaking down scores into CPU, GPU, and memory, Antutu helps identify which component might be slowing your device.

How to Use Antutu Benchmark?

Installation Process You can download Antutu Benchmark from official app stores or trusted sources. After installation, simply open the app and start the benchmark test.

Running the Test Make sure your device is charged and close background apps for accurate results. The test takes several minutes and runs through all performance checks automatically.

Common Questions About Antutu Benchmark

Is Antutu Benchmark reliable? Antutu is widely accepted but, like any benchmark, it has limitations. Scores can vary based on device conditions and software versions.

Does running Antutu affect my device? The test is safe but can cause the device to heat up temporarily due to intensive processing.

Tips to Get Accurate Results on Antutu Benchmark

Close All Apps Before testing, close any apps running in the background to avoid interference.

Use the Latest Version Always update Antutu Benchmark to the latest version to get the most accurate and relevant tests.

Antutu Benchmark Scores: What Do They Mean?

Understanding Scores Scores above 500,000 indicate high-end performance, suitable for gaming and heavy multitasking. Mid-range devices typically score between 200,000 to 400,000.

Comparing Scores Over Time Newer devices usually score higher, reflecting advancements in hardware technology.

Alternatives to Antutu Benchmark

Other Popular Benchmark Apps Besides Antutu, apps like Geekbench, 3DMark, and PCMark offer alternative performance tests focusing on specific aspects like CPU or graphics.

When to Use Alternatives Using multiple benchmarks gives a more rounded view of your device’s capabilities.

Conclusion Antutu Benchmark remains a powerful tool to measure and compare smartphone and device performance. By understanding how it works and interpreting the scores correctly, users can make smarter purchasing decisions and optimize their tech experience.

FAQs

Q1: Can Antutu Benchmark be used on all smartphones? Yes, Antutu supports most Android devices and has a version for iOS with limited features.

Q2: Does Antutu Benchmark require internet? No, you can run the benchmark offline, but internet is needed to check online rankings.

Q3: Why are my Antutu scores different on the same device? Scores can vary due to temperature, battery level, and background processes.

Q4: Can Antutu detect fake or modified devices? Antutu includes security checks that can flag devices with counterfeit or tampered hardware.

Q5: Is a higher Antutu score always better? Generally yes, but real-world performance depends on software optimization and usage scenarios too.

[theendearingdesigner]

Simplest Way to Track Social Media Marketing ROI?

Social media marketing is vital for modern businesses, but many struggle with one crucial question: "Is our social media investment paying off?" If you've been searching for a straightforward way to measure your social media ROI without getting lost in complex analytics, this guide is for you.

...

What is Social Media ROI?

Social media ROI measures the value your business gets from investing time, money, and resources into social media marketing compared to what you put in. This value comes in various forms:

Direct revenue from social media campaigns

Lead generation and customer acquisition

Website traffic increases

Brand awareness growth

Community building and engagement

Understanding your social media ROI helps determine if your strategies are working and where to focus your resources for maximum impact.

...

Why Tracking Social Media ROI Matters

Smarter decision-making: Know where to allocate your budget based on what's actually working.

Accountability: Justify your social media investments to stakeholders with hard data.

Performance optimization: Identify your most successful content, campaigns, and platforms.

Resource allocation: Make informed decisions about where to spend your time and money.

Competitive advantage: Use data insights to refine strategies faster than competitors.

...

The Simplest Method for Tracking Social Media ROI

After analyzing various tracking methods, the most effective yet straightforward approach combines UTM parameters with Google Analytics for website traffic and online conversions, supplemented by unique promo codes for direct sales attribution.

Here's how to implement this method in 5 simple steps:

Step 1: Define Clear, Measurable Goals

Start by establishing what you want to achieve with your social media efforts. Your goals should be SMART:

Specific: "Increase website traffic from Instagram by 20%" rather than "Get more traffic"

Measurable: Include numbers that can be tracked

Achievable: Set realistic targets based on your resources

Relevant: Align with broader business objectives

Time-bound: Set a specific timeframe

Common measurable social media goals include:

Generate X leads per month from social media

Increase website traffic from social channels by X%

Achieve X direct sales attributed to social media campaigns

Grow follower count by X within a specific timeframe

Improve engagement rate by X% over a defined period

Step 2: Identify Your Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

Select KPIs that directly relate to your goals:

For brand awareness:

Reach

Impressions

Follower growth rate

Brand mentions

Share of voice

For engagement:

Likes and reactions

Comments and replies

Shares and retweets

Click-through rate (CTR)

Engagement rate

For website traffic:

Website visits from social media

Referral traffic

Bounce rate of social traffic

Average session duration

For lead generation:

Number of leads from social media

Conversion rate of social media leads

Cost per lead (CPL)

Lead quality

For sales conversions:

Direct sales attributed to social media

Conversion rate from social media traffic

Revenue generated from campaigns

Return on ad spend (ROAS)

Step 3: Calculate Your Investment Costs

Track all costs associated with your social media efforts:

Advertising budgets for paid campaigns

Content creation costs (photography, videography, copywriting)

Staff time allocated to social media management

Software and tool subscriptions

Any other resources directly invested in social media

Be thorough here—accurate cost tracking is essential for true ROI calculation.

Step 4: Implement Simple Tracking Methods

For website traffic and conversions - UTM parameters + Google Analytics:

Create unique UTM parameters for all links shared on social media using Google's Campaign URL Builder or a similar tool

Structure your UTMs consistently:

utm_source = the platform (facebook, instagram, linkedin)

utm_medium = the type of traffic (social, paid_social)

utm_campaign = your specific campaign name

utm_content = the specific post or ad

Set up goals in Google Analytics to track conversions from social media traffic

Create regular reports showing traffic and conversions from each social channel

For direct sales attribution - Unique promo codes:

Create platform or campaign-specific promo codes (e.g., INSTA25, FB25)

Share these unique codes in your social media content

Track redemptions at checkout to directly attribute sales to specific platforms or campaigns

For broader impact - Platform analytics:

Use built-in analytics tools from each platform (Meta Business Suite, Instagram Insights, TikTok Analytics, etc.) to track engagement metrics and audience growth.

Step 5: Calculate Your ROI Using a Simple Formula

The fundamental formula for social media ROI is:

Social Media ROI = ((Value Generated - Cost of Investment) / Cost of Investment) × 100

For example:

If your e-commerce business generated $50,000 in sales from social media referrals

And you spent $18,000 on social media marketing

Your ROI would be (($50,000 - $18,000) / $18,000) × 100 = 178%

For B2B companies measuring lead value:

If you generated 100 qualified leads valued at $200 each (total value: $20,000)

And your social media costs were $4,000

Your ROI would be (($20,000 - $4,000) / $4,000) × 100 = 400%

...

Real-World Success Stories

Galaxy Theatres: By implementing targeted Facebook and Instagram campaigns with proper tracking, they achieved a 72% increase in ticket sales and significantly grew their Instagram engagement.

Incontact: This B2B company trained their sales team on social selling techniques with careful ROI tracking, resulting in a 215% increase in revenue.

Retro Kids: The toy company lowered their cost per acquisition by 31% and increased their return on ad spend to 4.27 through strategic social media campaigns with proper attribution.

...

Key Takeaways for Simple, Effective ROI Tracking

Focus on goals that matter to your business. Don't try to track everything—concentrate on the metrics that directly impact your business objectives.

Be consistent with your tracking methods. Use the same UTM structure and tracking processes every time to ensure accurate data.

Combine quantitative and qualitative data. Numbers tell only part of the story—customer feedback and sentiment are also valuable.

Start simple and build complexity over time. Begin with the basic tracking methods outlined here, then add sophistication as you become more comfortable.

Review and optimize regularly. Check your social media performance data at least monthly and adjust your strategy based on what's working.

By following these straightforward steps, any business can effectively track their social media ROI without getting overwhelmed by complex analytics or expensive tools. The key is consistency in tracking and a focus on the metrics that directly connect to your business goals.

Remember: The goal isn't perfect attribution, but rather a consistent framework that helps you make better decisions about your social media investments.

...

This article (https://theendearingdesigner.com/simplest-way-to-track-social-media-marketing-roi) was first published on The Endearing Designer.

[katharinebirbalsingh]

A note on Katharine Birbalsingh and Michaela Community School

The media narrative surrounding Michaela Community School in London mostly goes like this: Katharine Birbalsingh transforms poor inner-city (read: ethnic minority) children into academic superstars through the power of discipline. Thomas Chatterton Williams’s recent essay (full text here) in The Atlantic is merely the latest in a long line of fawning profiles that tout, implicitly or explicitly, Birbalsingh's iron fist as the solution to all that ails Britain. However, no article I have read so far has investigated other explanations for Michaela's high Progress 8 score nor endeavored to deconstruct the popular narrative surrounding the conservative superstar.

Williams begins the body of this piece by pointing out that Michaela “draws nearly all its students from Wembley, one of the poorest districts in London” in an apparent attempt to cast them as would-be low achievers, if not for Birbalsingh’s intervention. Although the characteristics of the individual pupils who attend Michaela have a greater impact on results than those of the school's neighborhood, he doesn’t bother to investigate how they differ. Among Michaela pupils who sat GCSEs over the past three years and whose prior attainment at Key Stage 2 (measured by an exam at the end of primary school) were available, 31% were high achieving, 53% were middle achieving, and only the remaining 16% were low achieving. For those who are uninterested in learning the nuances of British exam scoring, that means Michaela’s pupils were exceptionally bright even before they entered the school.

Birbalsingh furthers her savior narrative by describing Michaela's intake with unquantifiable terms such as "challenging" or "inner-city." However, only 28 of Michaela's 2024 GCSE takers (24%) were disadvantaged per the government's definition, "those who were eligible for free school meals at any time during the last 6 years and children looked after," in line with the national average of 25%. Although Birbalsingh likes to advance the narrative that she improves the academic performance of poor children—to be fair, she does, at a rate of roughly 30 individuals per year—she mostly improves the GCSE performance of middle class children.

Michaela's pupils are also self selecting, and therefore they are not representative of pupils in Wembley, London, or the UK as a whole. Any pupil who wishes to attend state secondary school in London must fill out a form indicating their top six choices, and they will be placed in one of those schools based on geography, demand, and availability. A pupil who does not wish to attend Michaela can leave it off their application, guaranteeing they won't attend. Therefore, Michaela is left with an intake of pupils who largely want to be there. By my calculations, Michaela's classwork and homework demand just over 49 hours of work each week. Although this does lead to good results, many teenagers would not abide by this; the 40-hour workweek is taxing even for most adults, who are blessed with more waking hours. Michaela's model and results cannot be easily repeated at any given school—at least not without systematic exclusion.

Williams unintentionally misrepresents a statistic when he asserts that “More than 80 percent of Michaela graduates continue their studies at Russell Group Universities.” He lacks a sufficiently deep understanding of the British school system to interpret this figure. While Michaela’s website states that 82% of its 2021 sixth form alumni attended a Russell Group university, it does not provide data on the university attendance of graduates from its secondary school, the disciplinarian institution which Williams profiles.

In the UK, sixth form (years 12 and 13, spent studying for A-levels) is separate from secondary school (years 7 through 11; the last 2 years, KS4, are spent studying for GCSEs). For Michaela, this also means a different admissions process. While there are no academic minimums to enroll in the secondary school, the sixth form requires an impressive average GCSE score of 7. Michaela has the capacity to enroll 120 students in each year of sixth form. However, the sixth form was under-enrolled by half in 2024. Michaela is a publicly-funded school, so this begs the question as to why state resources are not being utilized to their maximum capacity. The sixth form could educate more students simply by lowering GCSE requirements, but that would of course lead to less impressive university admissions—the kind that may not be displayed on Michaela’s home page. It is also possible that some secondary teachers would be pulled away to teach A-level subjects, worsening GCSE results, but that is speculation.

Thus far, all discussions of Michaela’s results have been woefully incomplete because they have not examined the effect of its narrow curriculum on its exam scores, instead focusing on the behaviorism that makes Birbalsingh’s authoritarian acolytes salivate. Williams's article is no different, only mentioning in passing that she believes “the national curriculum might force her to lower her own standards.” Depending on what changes the new Labour government implements, a revised national curriculum may indeed clash with Michaela’s philosophy. The school directs virtually all of its resources toward preparing pupils for its narrow selection of GCSE subjects or the few non-GCSE subjects that are required by the current national curriculum, such as PSHE, music theory, or PE. Birbalsingh is so focused on GCSE revision that she does not even believe volunteer work to be a "financially viable" option for Michaela pupils. Michaela's extra-curricular clubs all have a marginal cost of practically zero. In fact, several of them directly support curricular subjects, so they should rightfully be considered part of GCSE preparation.

A narrow curriculum obviously allows pupils to spend more time studying each GCSE subject they sit, thereby increasing their exam scores. Since most of the GCSE-level classes that Michaela offers are mandatory, pupils have little freedom to choose their own subjects (more on that later). Aside from that, cohort sizes stay remarkably close to 120 from year to year, and the school seems to impose a soft cap on classes of 30 pupils (120 / 4 = 30), so Michaela can hire the exact number of teachers it needs each year on a full-time basis. The school never needs to "waste" money hiring teachers for undersubscribed subjects, so it can also raise test scores by investing more in its core subjects than schools with broader curricula can afford to. On the flip side, Michaela does not offer dramatic arts, orchestra, individual sciences, computing, design and technology, foreign languages besides French, or a whole host of other popular subjects at the GCSE level. Other schools could easily raise their GCSE scores by slashing their curricula down to Michaela levels, but they offer a variety of classes because they care about their pupils experiencing joy and exploring a variety of career paths more than they care about their P8 scores.

For years, all of Michaela’s pupils have studied the same subjects at GCSE with some slight variations. A handful of pupils always sit for exams in heritage languages, but otherwise, the following paragraphs demonstrate approximately how the subject breakdown has looked over the past three years. (Earlier data has been distorted by COVID, or it is incomplete or outdated.) At the time of publication, 2024 data can be found here, while older results can be accessed through the link “Download data (1991-2024)”.

- 2022: 100% of pupils: English language, English literature, combined science, mathematics, religious studies. ~75%: French, geography/history. ~25%: Citizenship. ~25%: Art & design: photography, art & design: fine art. (I had to recreate this year from memory because individual subject entries do not appear to be retained in older data, but it is accurate to the best of my recollection.)

- 2023: 100% of pupils: English language, English literature, combined science, mathematics, religious studies. ~75%: French, geography/history. ~25%: Art & design: photography, art & design: fine art.

- 2024: 100% of pupils: English language, English literature, combined science, mathematics, religious studies, French. * ~80%: Geography/history. ~20%: Art & design: photography.

*This year, 3 pupils sat for biology, chemistry, and physics separately instead of taking combined science, but there is no explanation for this on Michaela's website.

Each year, about 90 Michaela pupils enter for the EBacc, a set of GCSE subjects encouraged by the British government. This usually works out to 75% of a cohort, but in 2024 it was 81% (94 pupils) because the cohort size was smaller than usual at only 116 pupils. Still, that means the largest class of EBacc entrants was only 32, in line with Michaela's projected class size of 30—despite Birbalsingh asserting that "class size matters little for success." Although the school comparison website does not list subject selections for individual pupils, it was easy to see how subjects were combined by cross-referencing exam entries per pupil and total entries per subject.

In 2021-2022, the pupils who did not enter for EBacc studied citizenship but neither French nor humanities. The study of art did not appear to correlate with EBacc entry.

In 2022-2023, the pupils who did not enter for EBacc studied photography and fine art but neither French nor humanities. Citizenship was dropped from the curriculum.

In 2023-2024, the pupils who did not enter for the EBacc studied photography but not humanities.

EBacc entry varies little across different pupil demographics such as gender, disadvantage, or English as an additional language. However, there is one characteristic that strongly determines EBacc entry at Michaela: prior attainment (PA). Over the past three years, out of 323 pupils for whom the PA data is available, 23% of low-PA pupils have entered the EBacc. This number is 83% for middle PA and 99% for high PA. According to my statistical analysis, the chance of these disparate "choices" arising without intervention is less than one percent.

At the end of Key Stage 3, Michaela staff pick approximately the top 75% of performers to enter for EBacc and require the lowest 25% to study other subjects.

This explains why only a few low-PA pupils enter for EBacc: although they are likely to remain in the bottom of their cohort throughout their schooling, some may improve enough to enter the top three quartiles. Although I am fully confident that my statistical analysis supports my assertion that Michaela pupils are not permitted to choose their GCSE subjects, the school has never disclosed a rationale for this practice, so the remainder of this essay will be speculation, not fact.

Michaela frequently boasts of its high Progress 8 (P8) score, and in order to understand my hypotheses, I recommend you familiarize yourself with its calculation. P8 is calculated by comparing actual Attainment 8 (A8) scores with expected scores based on Key Stage 2 (KS2) performance. This PDF explains how A8 scores are derived. (For my purposes, I will count double science as 2 GCSE subjects.) Therefore, a school with a non-selective intake such as Michaela can only change its P8 score by changing its A8 score.

Over the past few years, Michaela has refined its placement technique, presumably to increase its A8 scores. Pupils of any ability were permitted to study art at the GCSE level in 2022, but that option was removed the next year, probably so that high performers could devote more energy to EBacc subjects. Low performers who would have studied citizenship in 2022 instead studied art in 2023. Perhaps a part-time citizenship teacher would no longer be needed, and more resources could be directed to core subjects. All pupils studied GCSE French for the first time in 2024, giving each pupil 3 EBacc qualifications and finally maximizing A8 scores. However, the poorest performing 25% did not study humanities at KS4. This meant that approximately 120 * 2 * (1 - 0.25) = 180 pupils did study humanities at KS4, so with a typical class size of 30 and 6 class periods per day, one teacher could have accommodated all of them. If poor performers had studied humanities as well, hiring another teacher may have been necessary (and we already know how protective Michaela is of its budget).

The curricula for high and low performers are now identical, except for poor performers studying photography instead of humanities. Working from the assumption that Michaela intends to maximize its A8 score, this leads to one or two conclusions: it believes that poor performers will score higher on photography than French, and/or it does not want to expend humanities resources on poor performers because allocating them exclusively to high performers will raise the A8 score more. Similarly, no Michaela pupil has entered for more than 8 GCSE subjects (barring heritage languages, which do not demand too much revision time) since 2022, almost certainly to improve A8 scores. A limited class schedule allows pupils to devote more revision time to each core subject, while more exams would not raise A8, even if they did expand pupils’ horizons.

In the matter of GCSE curriculum, Michaela’s website is outdated and incomplete. It still enumerates the KS4 fine art curriculum, even though the subject was not offered at the GCSE level in 2024. It doesn’t mention that only three-quarters of pupils will study GCSE history or geography, so some parents who expect their children to study the humanities past age 13 may be in for a nasty surprise. Of course, this begs the question, what does Michaela have to hide?

It is difficult to understand how these prescribed schedules advantage Michaela’s pupils. Does the school not enroll maths whizzes who are determined to enter for mathematics, further mathematics, and physics at A-level, but who want one last artistic hurrah before starting sixth form? Are none of the poor performers averse enough to art that they'd prefer history? These prescriptions do not necessarily benefit Michaela’s pupils, but they do benefit the school’s P8.

Finally, Williams closes his article on a nostalgic note, contrasting his childhood with that of the Michaela pupil: “…my friends and I were free—luxuriously so—in ways these children possibly couldn’t even imagine. But that freedom that so many underprivileged and minority children bask in isn’t worth a damn thing if it leads to an adulthood boxed in by self-inflicted limitations.” Since the author was raised by college graduate parents and educated in private schools, and he is now a successful writer, he seems to believe that children who grow up rich can thrive on freedom, but the same is not true of the poor. Birbalsingh similarly believes that disadvantaged children need extreme discipline to succeed. However, she does not want to create a world where child poverty is eradicated so that every pupil can experience freedom, joy, and success at the same time. In fact, she envisions the opposite. She has spoken out against free meals for primary schoolers because she believes (without evidence!) that it would somehow make their parents less responsible. Even this concern were legitimate, it would pale in comparison to the necessity of feeding hungry children.

In the end, my dislike of Birbalsingh stems from her incredibly bleak worldview. She maintains that children should face the threat of starvation so their parents will be motivated to work harder. Even when testifying before Parliament, she believes the sexism that drives differences in A-level subject choices should remain unexamined. She propagates furry hoaxes—originally spread to mock trans people—to exemplify a supposed lack of discipline from parents. She believes if you don’t decorate your house for Christmas, you are destroying the country, and it is also somehow Vishnu’s problem (yes, the letter is truly that bizarre, and I recommend reading it for full effect). In her ideal world, she imagines suffering for suffering’s sake, a boot stamping on a human face—forever.

[covid-safer-hotties]

Reference saved in our archive

TL;DR: Covid restrictions saved lives at the beginning of the pandemic.

Key Points Question How did state restrictions affect the number of excess COVID-19 pandemic deaths?

Findings This cross-sectional analysis including all 50 US states plus the District of Columbia found that if all states had imposed COVID-19 restrictions similar to those used in the 10 most (least) restrictive states, excess deaths would have been an estimated 10% to 21% lower (13%-17% higher) than the 1.18 million that actually occurred during the 2-year period analyzed. Behavior changes were associated with 49% to 79% of this overall difference.

Meaning These findings indicate that collectively, stringent COVID-19 restrictions were associated with substantial decreases in excess deaths during the pandemic.

Abstract Importance Despite considerable prior research, it remains unclear whether and by how much state COVID-19−related restrictions affected the number of pandemic deaths in the US.

Objective To determine how state restrictions were associated with excess COVID-19 deaths over a 2-year analysis period.

Design, Setting, and Participants This was a cross-sectional study using state-level mortality and population data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for 2020 to 2022 compared with baseline data for 2017 to 2019. Data included the total US population, with separate estimates for younger than 45 years, 45 to 64 years, 65 to 84 years, and 85 years or older used to construct age-standardized measures. Age-standardized excess mortality rates and ratios for July 2020 to June 2022 were calculated and compared with prepandemic baseline rates. Excess death rates and ratios were then regressed on single or multiple restrictions, while controlling for excess death rates or ratios, from March 2020 to June 2020. Estimated values of the dependent variables were calculated for packages of weak vs strong state restrictions. Behavioral changes were investigated as a potential mechanism for the overall effects. Data analyses were performed from October 1, 2023, to June 13, 2024.

Exposures Age and cause of death.

Main Outcomes Excess deaths, age-standardized excess death rates per 100 000, and excess death ratios.

Results Mask requirements and vaccine mandates were negatively associated with excess deaths, prohibitions on vaccine or mask mandates were positively associated with death rates, and activity limitations were mostly not associated with death rates. If all states had imposed restrictions similar to those used in the 10 most restrictive states, excess deaths would have been an estimated 10% to 21% lower than the 1.18 million that actually occurred during the 2-year analysis period; conversely, the estimates suggest counterfactual increases of 13% to 17% if all states had restrictions similar to those in the 10 least-restrictive states. The estimated strong vs weak state restriction difference was 271 000 to 447 000 deaths, with behavior changes associated with 49% to 79% of the overall disparity.

Conclusions and Relevance This cross-sectional study indicates that stringent COVID-19 restrictions, as a group, were associated with substantial decreases in pandemic mortality, with behavior changes plausibly serving as an important explanatory mechanism. These findings do not support the views that COVID-19 restrictions were ineffective. However, not all restrictions were equally effective; some, such as school closings, likely provided minimal benefit while imposing substantial cost.

[dijacrypt]

Unlocking the Power of Liquidity Pools on STON.fi

Decentralized exchanges (DEXs) have reshaped how people trade cryptocurrencies, eliminating middlemen and giving users full control over their assets. At the core of this revolution is liquidity pooling, an innovation that ensures seamless trading and stable pricing.

STON.fi, built on The Open Network (TON), takes liquidity pools to a new level, providing a fast, cost-effective, and profitable experience for traders and liquidity providers. This article explores liquidity pools, how they work, their benefits, and how STON.fi optimizes them for better earnings and efficient swaps.

What Are Liquidity Pools

A liquidity pool is a smart contract that holds a pair of tokens, allowing users to trade between them instantly. Instead of matching buyers and sellers as traditional exchanges do, liquidity pools enable automated swaps using an algorithm that adjusts prices based on token availability.

On STON.fi, liquidity pools power the exchange, ensuring that users can trade at any time without delays or order book dependencies. The system works efficiently, reducing slippage and making transactions smoother for traders.

How Liquidity Pools Work on STON.fi

Each liquidity pool on STON.fi contains two tokens. When a trade happens:

The trader deposits one token into the pool.

The smart contract calculates the exchange rate based on the pool’s liquidity balance.

The pool adjusts, ensuring liquidity remains available for future trades.

This model allows for instant, permissionless, and decentralized trading, making STON.fi a preferred platform for those looking for speed, low fees, and optimal trade execution.

Earning Passive Income with Liquidity Pools

Liquidity pools rely on liquidity providers (LPs) who deposit tokens into the pools, making trading possible. In return, STON.fi rewards LPs with a share of trading fees collected from transactions within the pool.

Key earning factors for LPs on STON.fi include:

✅ Trading Fees – Every transaction incurs a 0.2% fee, which is distributed to liquidity providers based on their share in the pool.

✅ Pool Share – The more liquidity an LP provides, the higher their share of collected fees.

✅ Trading Volume – Higher trading activity within a pool results in greater fee earnings for LPs.

By participating as an LP on STON.fi, users can earn passive income while supporting decentralized trading.

Key Metrics to Evaluate Liquidity Pools on STON.fi

To make informed decisions before adding liquidity, users should track key performance indicators of a pool:

1. APR (Annual Percentage Rate)

Reflects the estimated annual earnings for liquidity providers.

A higher APR suggests better returns, but rates fluctuate based on trading activity.

2. TVL (Total Value Locked)

Represents the total value of assets in a liquidity pool.

Higher TVL means greater liquidity, leading to lower slippage and smoother trading.

3. 24H Trading Volume

Measures how frequently a pool is used within 24 hours.

Higher trading volume translates to more fees earned by liquidity providers.

STON.fi provides real-time tracking of these metrics, allowing users to optimize their liquidity provision strategy for maximum profitability.

Understanding Risks: Impermanent Loss and How to Mitigate It

Providing liquidity comes with potential risks, the most common being impermanent loss. This occurs when the price of deposited tokens fluctuates significantly, causing the value of assets in the pool to be lower than if they were simply held in a wallet.

To reduce exposure to impermanent loss:

Choose high-liquidity pools with stable trading activity.

Diversify by providing liquidity across multiple pools.

Consider stablecoin pairs for lower volatility.

STON.fi’s optimized liquidity pool structure minimizes impermanent loss, allowing LPs to retain as much value as possible while still earning from trading fees.

Why STON.fi Is the Best Choice for Liquidity Providers and Traders

Among decentralized exchanges, STON.fi offers one of the most efficient liquidity pooling systems, ensuring low fees, deep liquidity, and high rewards. Here’s why it stands out:

✅ Built on The Open Network (TON) – Fast and scalable infrastructure for seamless trading.

✅ Ultra-Low Fees – A competitive 0.2% transaction fee benefits both traders and LPs.

✅ Deep Liquidity – Well-funded pools ensure smooth transactions with minimal slippage.

✅ Passive Income Opportunities – LPs earn continuous rewards with high APR.

✅ User-Friendly Interface – Real-time data tracking for smart liquidity management.

By integrating innovative technology, efficient tokenomics, and a rewarding LP model, STON.fi has become one of the most trusted platforms for decentralized trading and liquidity provision.

Final Thoughts

Liquidity pools are the foundation of decentralized exchanges, and STON.fi has optimized the model to deliver the best experience for both traders and liquidity providers.

By understanding how liquidity pools work, tracking key metrics, and managing risks, users can maximize their earnings while supporting decentralized finance.

With its fast execution, low fees, and high rewards, STON.fi is the go-to platform for anyone looking to engage in DeFi trading or passive income through liquidity provision.

👉 Start trading or providing liquidity on STON.fi today and take advantage of the decentralized financial revolution!

[jangidsolar]

Choosing the Best Solar Panels for Your Home: A Comprehensive Guide

Powering your home with solar energy is a smart choice. As more homeowners embrace renewable energy, it’s essential to select the right solar panels for your unique needs. This guide will walk you through the process, from understanding panel types to installation options.

The Growing Popularity of Home Solar

Solar energy has gained traction in recent years. Homeowners see the benefits of reduced energy costs and increased property value. With improved technology and efficiency, solar panels are more accessible than ever.

Financial Incentives and Environmental Benefits

Investing in solar panels helps the environment by reducing carbon footprints. Many countries offer financial incentives like tax credits and rebates. These can help offset installation costs, making solar energy an attractive option.

Factors to Consider Before Choosing Solar Panel

Before diving into your solar panel journey, keep these factors in mind:

Energy Needs: How much power do you consume?

Roof Condition: Is your roof ready for installation?

Local Climate: Does the weather in your area support solar energy efficiency?

Understanding Solar Panel Types and Technologies

Monocrystalline vs. Polycrystalline Solar Panels: Efficiency and Cost

When picking solar panels, two popular types arise: monocrystalline and polycrystalline panels.

Monocrystalline: These panels are made from single-crystal silicon. They are more efficient and have a longer lifespan. Their sleek appearance is also a bonus. However, they come at a higher price.

Polycrystalline: Made from multiple silicon crystals, they are less efficient but cheaper. They may take up more space and have a shorter lifespan.

Thin-Film Solar Panels: Advantages and Limitations

Thin-film solar panels are lightweight and flexible, making them easy to install. They perform well in low-light conditions. However, they usually have lower efficiency ratings and may require more space.

Choosing the Right Panel Technology for Your Needs

Consider your budget, space, and energy requirements when choosing between these panel types. Each has its strengths and weaknesses.

Assessing Your Energy Needs and Roof Suitability

Calculating Your Energy Consumption: Using Utility Bills

To choose the right system, calculate your average monthly energy consumption. Check your utility bills to see how much energy you use. This will help you determine the number of solar panels needed.

Roof Assessment: Size, Orientation, and Shading

Examine your roof's size, angle, and exposure to sunlight. Ideally, roofs south of the equator should face south, with minimal shading from trees or buildings. A professional can assess your roof's suitability.

Professional Solar Panel System Design

Consulting with a solar professional can ensure your system is designed for efficiency and meets local regulations.

Key Specifications and Performance Metrics

Solar Panel Wattage and Efficiency: Understanding the Numbers

Wattage indicates how much electricity a panel produces. Look for panels with high efficiency ratings, typically between 15% to 22%. Higher efficiency means more energy with fewer panels.

Warranty and Durability: Long-Term Investment Protection

Check warranties on solar panels. A strong warranty indicates durability and reliability, often lasting 25 years. This provides peace of mind for your investment.

Temperature Coefficient and Performance in Various Climates

The temperature coefficient measures performance in heat. Panels with a lower temperature coefficient are better in hot climates. Consider this when selecting solar panels for your area.

Top Solar Panel Manufacturers and Brands

Reputation and Reliability: Researching Top Brands

Research the top solar panel brands. Look for companies with strong reputations, quality products, and good service. Brands like Premier, Tata Power Solar, Vikram Solar, Emmvee and Adani Solar are popular choices.

Customer Reviews and Feedback: Verifying Quality and Service

Read customer reviews to gauge satisfaction. Feedback from real users can highlight potential issues and the company's reliability.

Price Comparison and Value Assessment

Compare prices among different brands. Consider value by evaluating efficiency and warranty alongside cost. Sometimes, a slightly higher price can lead to better long-term savings.

Installation, Maintenance, and Financing Options

Choosing a Qualified Installer: Importance of Proper Installation

Select a qualified installer. Proper installation is key to optimizing energy production and ensuring safety. Check for certifications and customer feedback on installers.

Regular Maintenance and Cleaning: Maximizing Panel Lifespan

Solar panels require minimal maintenance. Regular cleaning and inspections help maximize performance. Ensure branches or debris don’t block sunlight.

Financing Options: Leasing, Purchasing, and Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs)

Evaluate your financing options. You can purchase panels outright, lease them, or choose PPAs. Each option has different cost structures and benefits, so explore what works best for your finances.

Conclusion: Making the Right Choice for Your Home Solar System

Key Takeaways: Summarizing the Decision-Making Process

Choosing the best solar panels requires assessing energy needs, roof suitability, and panel types. Research brands and understand financing options.

Next Steps: Initiating the Solar Panel Installation Process

Ready to go solar? Consult with Jangid Solar Energy to design your system and start the installation process.

Resources for Further Research: Government and Industry Links

Explore additional resources for more information. Government websites and Jangid Solar Energy provide valuable insights to help you make informed decisions.

[coconox]

3.23.24 whb spreadsheet update

hi again !! lots of new things were added yesterday in the spreadsheet so i wanted to make a post giving a brief description of everything thats been added/changed :>

slightly 🤏 more in-depth details for some additions will be mentioned under the read more but tl;dr

added recommended builds for satan (attacker), mammon (attacker), gamigin (still working on how to get images of their signature artifacts but info about why they're there is already included)

separated "read me" info into 2 parts: first part includes general stuff about the spreadsheet, 2nd part includes stuff in regards to only the build lists

included f2p/beginner tips in the first part of "read me" (when you open up the spreadsheet you are automatically sent to the first part of "read me," the tips are located near the bottom of that sheet)

added mammon (attacker)'s unholy board requirements

new sheet created named "other". contains random calculations such as how long it takes for f2p players to get enough seals/yellow keys to hit hard pity on their respective banners (debut l/s-ranks), how much time it takes to max likeability, how much event currency is needed to get all event-exclusive items, + more

some additions to add in the near future:

recommended team comps (will range from l-ranks only to s- or a+-ranks only of a certain element to a mix of both)

mammon side branch requirements to obtain all voicelines

that's all for now ! if you wanna see more info about certain points it'll be down here ↓

i'll just be listing out the numbers from earlier rather than typing the whole thing cause i'm lazy lmao

point 2 - "read me" info in regards to build lists

the sample outline and notes from earlier additions of the spreadsheet are still there

the new addition is creating a very VERY brief overview of everyone's ratings in the form of a tier list

tl;dr of each rating provided in the screenshots are

s - provides more than enough to clear all content a - good, but some cases may have better alternatives b - needs a bit more thinking but still relatively ok

i will only be showing VERY SMALL SNIPPETS OF IT. i highly recommend going to the spreadsheet directly to see the whole list since it's quite long

again, the overall performance ratings are based off of GAMEPLAY ONLY, NOT lore. the overall ratings are a collective decision made by the ppl working on this sheet based off of trial and error across different stages and/or personal experiences before working on this spreadsheet as a whole

if you have a differing opinion in regards to the reasoning behind a certain character's overall rating or recommended builds my asks/dms are always open for discussion!

marksman

all marksmen are included in this tier list they are just out of frame for me to properly screenshot it all without losing the quality (i.e. properly seeing which character is in which tier), i recommend seeing the sheet itself if you are looking for a certain character

tanks

gabriel, eligos, and valefor are on this list just out of frame from the screenshot. i recommend seeing the sheet itself if you are looking for any of those 3

close-rangers

all close-rangers are included in this tier list they are just out of frame for me to properly screenshot it all without losing the quality (i.e. properly seeing which characters are in each tier), i recommend seeing the sheet itself if you are looking for a certain character

healers

buer is on this list he is just out of frame for me to properly screenshot without losing any quality

each character on this list has a 1-2 sentence description in the notes (indicated with the small triangle in the corner of each image) as to why they're placed at a certain rating (more in-depth explanations are in their respective build lists)

point 3 - f2p/beginner tips

pretty straight forward, if there's any other tips you think i should add don't hesitate to send an ask/dm!

point 5 - "other"

a lot of random calculations are on there so i'll just provide screenshots of some of the important ones

how long does it take to get enough seals/yellow keys to hit hard pity?

this is based off of dailies/weeklies/monthlies alone. stuff obtained through shop or events or likeability rewards or panty party are not included

tl;dr, way too long lmao i hope pb provides more ways to get seals in the future

how much time does it take to farm enough event currency to buy all event-exclusive items?

assuming you farm the advanced difficulty stage

i cannot emphasize this enough to check out the spreadsheet as i'm exlcuding a whole lot of info/notes that ngl i'm too lazy to type it all out lmao. but yeah, that's the update so far with the spreadsheet, have a cookie you deserve it after reading all this 🍪

[hetalia-club]

Got Bored And Made An Entire Hetalia Baseball League (HBL)

the league is meant to have fictitious and near impossible goals for regular humans to achieve. They are all scaled beside each other accounting for superhuman strength.

~America's Stats~

Batting averages: Regular Season: .300 Projected: .317 Career: .297

Running Speed MPH- 20-25 mph Hitting power- 110-115 mph Regular Season Stolen Bases: 40 Career Stolen Bases: 575

These statistics depict America as a highly productive and powerful player, reflecting his energetic and competitive personality. America would be an outstanding baseball player, excelling in power hitting, run production, and consistency. His leadership qualities and durability would make him a central figure on any team, and his dynamic performance would make him a fan favorite and a feared opponent.

Freedom Fighters - link to their team and positions

Other Players: (will update with link as they are added) America Russia Sweden England Ireland Iceland Canada Denmark Turkey France Scotland Greece Germany Japan Nyo!America Prussia China Nyo!England Spain Austria Italy Norway Romano Finland America's breakdown below >> (Chat GTP helped with this part because I'm not good at describing things or sports talk)((it also made me the lay out above I made the stats and it put them in MLB format for me & calculated batting average because math :/ ))

Considerations for America’s Stats:

Character Traits and Personality:

Energetic and Competitive: America is depicted as highly energetic, competitive, and confident. These traits suggest a player who would likely be very active and a significant contributor on the field.

Leadership and Ambition: His leadership qualities imply a strong and consistent performer, aiming to be the best.

Balanced Stat Distribution:

Regular Season:

Games Played (GP): 162, indicating he plays a full season without many injuries.

At-Bats (AB): 600, suggesting he’s a regular starter.

Runs (R): 120, showing his ability to score frequently.

Hits (H): 180, reflecting a good batting average.

Extra-base Hits (2B, 3B, HR): High numbers in doubles (40), triples (5), and home runs (35), indicating a powerful hitter.

RBI: 100, demonstrating his ability to drive in runs.

Walks (BB) and Strikeouts (SO): 70 BB and 120 SO, showing he has a good eye but also takes risks.

Projected:

Small improvements across the board to reflect growth potential and continued high performance.

More runs, hits, and slightly more home runs to show continued development.

Career:

Games Played (GP): 2000, reflecting a long and successful career.

At-Bats (AB): 7400, showing sustained participation.

Runs (R): 1200, Hits (H): 2200, Doubles (2B): 500, Triples (3B): 50, Home Runs (HR): 350.

RBI: 1100, indicating a significant contributor to the team’s offense over his career.

Walks (BB): 850, Strikeouts (SO): 1400, showing good plate discipline over a long career.

Summary:

Regular Season: America's stats reflect his dynamic and impactful presence, consistent with a high-energy and competitive personality.

Projected: A slight improvement in performance metrics suggests his potential for growth.

Career: His career stats highlight sustained excellence and significant contributions, aligning with his ambitious nature and leadership qualities.

Player Profile: America (Hetalia)

Overall Assessment:

America would be an excellent baseball player, likely one of the best on his team. His stats suggest he is a highly productive, powerful, and consistent performer who excels in multiple aspects of the game.

Key Attributes:

Power Hitter:

With 35 home runs in a regular season and 350 over his career, America would be known for his power at the plate. His ability to hit home runs would make him a valuable asset in driving in runs and changing the course of a game with a single swing.

Run Producer:

Scoring 120 runs and driving in 100 RBIs in a regular season indicate that he is frequently involved in scoring opportunities. His presence in the lineup would mean that he consistently contributes to his team’s offense, both by scoring runs and batting in teammates.

Versatile Hitter:

With 40 doubles and 5 triples in a regular season, America would demonstrate the ability to hit for extra bases regularly, making him a threat to get into scoring position and drive in runs.

Consistent Performer:

A batting average around .300 in the regular season and over his career shows that he is a reliable hitter. His consistency would make him a cornerstone of his team’s batting lineup.

Durable and Dependable:

Playing 162 games in a regular season and accumulating 2000 career games indicate that he is highly durable and dependable, rarely missing games due to injury. This consistency would be a significant asset for any team.

Good Plate Discipline:

With 70 walks and 120 strikeouts in a regular season, America shows a good balance between patience and aggression. He has the eye to take walks but also takes his chances, leading to a relatively high number of strikeouts.

Leadership and Charisma:

Reflecting his personality in Hetalia, America would likely be a leader both on and off the field. His confidence and enthusiasm would make him a natural leader, inspiring and motivating his teammates.

[darkmaga-returns]

IMO, the sanctions continue to be a massive blessing in disguise for Russia and most of the world—for all the difficulties they’ve caused, economic performances are better for most of the Global Majority, although Europe and the Outlaw US Empire have suffered blowback and are politically handcuffed. How many more EU misleaders will be replaced in 2025? Meanwhile, Putin reports much of what we already know, although that knowledge was unofficial. The National Welfare Fund’s figures are key:

President of Russia Vladimir Putin: Colleagues, Good afternoon! We are holding the first meeting on economic issues this year. Today, I propose summing up the preliminary results of the past 2024 in terms of the state of affairs in the real sector, in the field of finance, including in the public sector. On the whole – and we have already talked about this – last year was quite successful for the Russian Economy. Key macro indicators are positive thanks to the responsible, calculated and joint actions of the state and the business community Area. We will consider them in detail today. But first, I would like to say a few words about the state of the federal Budget. According to estimates, its deficit last year amounted to 1.7 percent of GDP. This is an acceptable level, especially against the background of the state of affairs in the public finances of some so-called developed economies. According to estimates, in 2024, the budget deficit in relation to GDP was: in the United States, -6.2 percent; France, -6.2 percent; Italy, -3.8 percent; Japan, -3.7 percent; and Germany, –2.2 percent.

[coding-quark]

Binary Search #2 - Opposite Polarity

In binary search, the final state of the pointers low and high is determined by the algorithm's logic of narrowing down the search space. Here's a breakdown of why, after the search completes, low becomes possible and high becomes not possible in certain scenarios:

Key Concepts in Binary Search

Initial Setup:

low is the starting index (e.g., 0).

high is the ending index (e.g., n-1 for an array of size n).

The target is assumed to be in the array, and the search is performed on a sorted array.

Search Logic:

The algorithm repeatedly calculates the middle index mid and compares the target to the value at mid.

Depending on the comparison, low or high is adjusted to narrow the search space:

If the target is less than mid, the search continues in the left half (high = mid - 1).

If the target is greater than mid, the search continues in the right half (low = mid + 1).

The loop continues until low > high.

Termination:

When the loop ends, the correct position (if the target exists) is at low or high.

If the target is not found, the final low and high indicate the first element greater than the target and the last element less than the target, respectively.

Why low is Possible and high is Not Possible

This occurs in two scenarios:

1. Target is Found

The target is located at low or high during the search.

For example:

If the target is found at mid, the loop ends, and low or high points to the correct index.

In this case, the final low or high is possible (since it corresponds to the actual position of the target).

2. Target is Not Found

The loop ends when low > high, and the final low and high are adjusted to indicate the closest boundaries to the target.

For example:

If the target is less than the last element, the final high is the last index less than the target.

If the target is greater than the first element, the final low is the first index greater than the target.

In this case:

The final low is the first index greater than the target (possible, since it exists in the array).

The final high is the last index less than the target (not possible, since the target is not in the array).

Why This Happens

The binary search algorithm is designed to narrow the search space iteratively.

When the loop ends, the final low and high represent the closest boundaries to the target:

low is the first element greater than the target (possible).

high is the last element less than the target (not possible, since the target is not in the array).

Example

Consider the array [1, 3, 5, 7] and target 4 (not in the array):

Initial: low = 0, high = 3.

First mid = 1 (value 3). Since 4 > 3, set low = 2.

Next mid = 2 (value 5). Since 4 < 5, set high = 1.

Now low = 2, high = 1 → loop ends.

Final state:

low = 2 (value 5 is possible).

high = 1 (value 3 is not possible, as it is less than the target).

Conclusion

After the binary search completes:

The final low is the first index greater than the target (possible, since it exists in the array).

The final high is the last index less than the target (not possible, since the target is not in the array).

This reflects the algorithm's ability to accurately locate the target or determine its position relative to the array.