#lawyer data scraping solutions

[actowizsolutions0]

Lawyer Data Scraping Services: Unlocking Legal Insights with Automation

The legal industry thrives on accurate and up-to-date information. Whether you’re a law firm, legal researcher, or a business seeking legal insights, having access to comprehensive lawyer data can be a game-changer. This is where lawyer data scraping services come into play, offering an efficient way to collect, analyze, and utilize legal data.

What is Lawyer Data Scraping?

Lawyer data scraping is the process of extracting publicly available information about attorneys, law firms, case histories, and legal precedents from various online sources. This automated technique eliminates the need for manual research, saving time and ensuring accuracy in data collection.

Benefits of Lawyer Data Scraping Services

1. Comprehensive Legal Research

With automated data scraping, legal professionals can gather extensive information about attorneys, case laws, and judicial decisions, allowing for better legal analysis and strategy development.

2. Competitor Analysis for Law Firms

Law firms can monitor competitors by collecting insights on their practice areas, client reviews, and success rates, enabling data-driven decision-making.

3. Efficient Lead Generation

Businesses seeking legal services can use lawyer data scraping to identify the best legal professionals based on expertise, reviews, and geographical location.

4. Regulatory and Compliance Monitoring

Stay updated with changing legal landscapes by tracking regulatory updates, compliance policies, and amendments in various jurisdictions.

How Lawyer Data Scraping Services Work

Professional web scraping services extract legal data by:

Collecting information from lawyer directories, bar association websites, and court records.

Structuring data in a user-friendly format for easy analysis.

Ensuring compliance with ethical data extraction practices.

Other Data Scraping Solutions for Various Industries

In addition to legal data, businesses can benefit from other data scraping services such as:

Flipkart dataset: Extract product details, pricing trends, and customer reviews for eCommerce analysis.

Web scraping Zillow: Gain real estate insights with property listings, pricing trends, and neighborhood analytics.

Extract large-scale data: Automate massive data extraction for enhanced business intelligence and market research.

Google Shopping scraper: Analyze competitor pricing, product availability, and customer reviews to refine your eCommerce strategies.

Conclusion

Lawyer data scraping services empower law firms, researchers, and businesses with critical legal insights. By automating data collection, professionals can make informed decisions, improve efficiency, and stay ahead in the legal industry. Explore lawyer data scraping solutions today and unlock a world of legal intelligence!

For expert data scraping solutions tailored to various industries, contact Actowiz Solutions today!

[vergess]

Okay, let's break down yet another Popular AI Post That Is Stupid And Misunderstands These Tools.

Does generative AI violate copyright: No. That's not how copyright or the AI work.

Does scraping public data for training violate copyright: In my opinion, yes, but this is an actual point of debate, and the real grey zone that IP lawyers will be debating for the next decade.

Will tighter copyright protections improve the risk of AI on the job market for artists: No. At not point in modern history has copyrighting ever benefitted artists instead of corpos and this is another such case.

Will tighter copyright protections on training scrapes slow down AI model creation: No, the only new models being created these days with any regularity are already using licensed works in the first place. The days of widespread wild west data scraping are long over; purchasing data in bulk is easier, higher quality, and faster. The new models already use licensed content, but they still present the same existential risk to people whose living is made in the arts.

Finally, some AI bro who wouldn't know what dataspace is if you paid him is NOT A RELIABLE SOURCE FOR HOW GENERATIVE AI IS CREATED.

Doing a witty clapback on some dipshit nonsense you took seriously just evinces your own ignorance along with the ignorance of the other party.

Some actual AI concerns you can actually focus on if you actually care about this issue instead of just wanting to take a shit on disabled artists ant stump for all AI to belong exclusively to mega corps that pay predatory license fees:

Artists who sell stock images are often being tricked into selling AI licensing rights too. This is genuine predatory behaviour cloaked in the protection of "it's all licensed though" and is worthy of direct focus and intervention. Far and away this is the bigger issue as unlicensed public data scraping is relatively uncommon now.

Artists who make a living on small scale commissions as well as those working under major production studios are at huge risk of lost income and livelihood, something you can address by fighting for stronger labour protections for those industries, and better social support and financial support for those indies.

Spammers using generative AI, especially text gen, to optimize their spam pages for search engines, causing gibbering nonsense to be the majority of search results for educational topics

Malicious actors can use generative AI to produce convincing disinformation which is best combatted by teaching wider spread media literacy, and improving the general veracity and quality of news reporting in yous state, territory or country.

At no point is "make generative AI something that only megacorps are allowed to use" the solution to anything.

And when you call for licensing of images, what you are saying is, very directly: if you are a normal person, you should not be allowed to use this medium. It is for rich people only, because only rich people are "morally capable" of using it. Rich people, though, they should be allowed to continue abusing copyright and licensure laws, for sure, because they're willing to pay the fines.

Like, come the fuck on people. I'm basically an anit-AI luddite screaming at clouds, but at least I know which clouds I'm screaming at instead of calling a random piece of gravel The Big Danger Cloud, holy shit.

[actowizdatasolutions]

⚖️ Legal Data Intelligence: Extract Lawyer Profiles & Reviews from Avvo, Justia & LawRato In the digital age, choosing the right attorney often starts with online research. For legal tech platforms, directories, and market researchers, having structured, #ReliableLegalData is a competitive advantage.

At Actowiz Solutions, we help clients unlock this potential by scraping lawyer profiles and client reviews from top platforms like #Avvo, #Justia, and #LawRato-enabling smarter analysis and discovery.

🔍 What You Can Extract:

✅ Lawyer bios, specialties & bar affiliations

✅ Client reviews & rating history

✅ Practice areas, contact info & case types

✅ Comparative analysis across platforms & regions

🎯 Ideal for:

📚 Legal directories & aggregators

📈 Market research & analytics firms

💼 Law firm performance benchmarking

⚙️ Legal tech apps & referral platforms

Transform legal listings into actionable insights and elevate your #DataDrivenStrategy. 📩 Get in touch: sales@actowizsolutions.com

🌐 Learn more: https://www.actowizsolutions.com/lawyer-profile-review-scraping-avvo-justia-lawrato.php

[lawyersdatascraping]

Canada Tax Attorneys Mailing List

Canada Tax Attorneys Mailing List

Canada Tax Attorneys Email List: Elevate Your Legal Marketing with Lawyersdatalab.com. 

In the competitive legal landscape, having access to a verified and comprehensive Canada Tax Attorneys Email List can significantly enhance the marketing efforts of law firms and legal marketing companies. Lawyersdatalab.com offers a meticulously curated database designed to connect you with top tax attorneys across Canada, providing a powerful tool for strategic outreach and client acquisition. 

Why Choose a Canada Tax Attorneys Email List? 

Targeted marketing is essential for success, especially in the legal field. The Canada Tax Attorneys Email List from Lawyersdatalab.com enables you to focus on a niche audience, delivering your message to professionals specializing in tax law. This tailored approach ensures higher engagement and a better return on investment for your marketing campaigns. 

Data Fields Included 

Our email list covers a wide range of essential information, including: 

- Full Name of Attorneys 

- Verified Email Addresses 

- Phone Numbers 

- Law Firm Details 

- Areas of Specialization (Tax Law) 

- Physical Office Addresses 

- Years of Experience 

- Professional Associations Membership 

- Practice Licenses 

- Website and Social Media Links 

Benefits for Law Firms and Marketing Companies 

1. Streamlined Outreach: Connect directly with tax attorneys, saving time and resources otherwise spent on cold outreach. 

2. Enhanced Lead Generation: Identify and engage with potential collaborators, referral partners, or clients. 

3. Targeted Campaigns: Develop specialized marketing strategies aimed at professionals within the tax law niche. 

4. Improved ROI: A verified and accurate email list ensures your campaigns are directed toward relevant recipients, reducing bounce rates. 

5. Networking Opportunities: Build relationships with leading legal professionals, fostering collaboration and business growth. 

Popular Lawyers Mailing List

USA Bankruptcy Lawyers Verified Contact Information

Estate Attorneys Email List

USA Family Lawyers Mailing List

Verified Personal Injury Lawyers Email List

Bankruptcy Attorneys Email Lists

Criminal Lawyers Email List Scraping

Admiralty Lawyers Email List

Business Law Attorney Email List

Appeals Lawyer Email List

Civil Litigation Attorney Mailing List

Why Choose Lawyersdatalab.com? 

At Lawyers Data Lab, we prioritize accuracy, compliance, and data security. Our email lists are regularly updated and verified to ensure you receive only the most relevant and reliable information. With a deep understanding of the legal industry, we provide data solutions that align with your marketing goals. 

Get Started Today 

Unlock the potential of data-driven marketing with our Canada Tax Attorneys Email List. Empower your campaigns, improve engagement, and expand your reach in the legal sector. 

📧 Email: info@lawyersdatalab.com

🌐 Website: Lawyersdatalab.com

[datascraping001]

Unlock Growth Opportunities with a Verified Bankruptcy Lawyers Email List – USA

Unlock Growth Opportunities with a Verified Bankruptcy Lawyers Email List – USA 🌐 Website: Datascrapingservices.com📧 Email: info@datascrapingservices.com

In the competitive landscape of legal marketing, reaching the right professionals with targeted, reliable data is crucial. When your business or service caters to the legal industry, especially the field of bankruptcy law, a Verified Bankruptcy Lawyers Email List (USA) is an invaluable resource to connect with decision-makers quickly and efficiently. At Datascrapingservices.com, we specialize in delivering well-segmented, up-to-date, and fully verified email databases to power your outreach campaigns.

🎯 Why Target Bankruptcy Lawyers?

Bankruptcy lawyers play a critical role in helping individuals and businesses navigate financial hardship. They work closely with debtors, creditors, and courts, making them valuable prospects for a range of services—from legal tech and financial planning tools to B2B software, document automation solutions, continuing legal education (CLE) providers, and more.

Our Verified Bankruptcy Lawyers Email List gives you direct access to thousands of licensed attorneys and law firms across the United States, allowing you to reach your niche audience with precision.

🗂️ Key Data Fields Included:

Attorney Name

Law Firm Name

Verified Email Address

Phone Number

Area of Practice (Bankruptcy, Chapter 7, Chapter 11, Chapter 13, etc.)

Office Address (City, State, Zip)

Website URL

Bar Membership Details

Social Media Profiles (LinkedIn, if available)

Years of Experience / License Date

All our data is verified for accuracy and freshness, ensuring maximum deliverability and engagement with your campaigns.

✅ Benefits of the Bankruptcy Lawyers Email List

1. Hyper-Targeted Marketing Instead of broad legal outreach, focus your campaigns directly on attorneys who specialize in bankruptcy law.

2. Save Time & Resources Avoid hours of manual research or costly ad targeting experiments. Our ready-to-use list saves time and accelerates your outreach efforts.

3. Boost ROI Whether you're marketing legal software, consulting services, or continuing education programs, reaching a focused audience increases your chances of achieving better ROI.

4. Expand Your Legal Network Build long-term professional relationships with attorneys, firms, and bankruptcy law experts who may require your services repeatedly or on retainer.

5. Easy Integration with Marketing Tools Import the list seamlessly into your CRM, email marketing tools, or LinkedIn outreach platforms to streamline your workflow and automate follow-ups.

6. Up-to-Date & Compliant Our lists are updated regularly to ensure accuracy and are compiled with respect for privacy and compliance standards.

Popular Email List

Verified Dentist Email List

Verified Mortgage Officer Email List

Weedmaps Dispensaries Email List

Bankruptcy Email List

Primary Schools Email List USA

Canadian Doctors Email List

Texas Lawyers Email List

Personal Injury Lawyer Email List

Hotel Email Lists

USA Students Email List Scraping

Best Verified Bankruptcy Lawyers Email List Services in USA:

Denver, Fresno, Bakersfield, Mesa, Indianapolis, Atlanta, Fort Worth, Washington, Orlando, Long Beach, Austin, Houston, San Jose, Tulsa, Omaha, Wichita, San Antonio, Fresno, Long Beach, Philadelphia, Louisville, Chicago, San Francisco, Colorado, New Orleans, Sacramento, Dallas, Las Vegas, El Paso, Charlotte, Milwaukee, Oklahoma City, Raleigh, Columbus, Jacksonville, Seattle, Memphis, Sacramento, Virginia Beach, Nashville, Boston, Tucson and New York.

🔧 Why Choose Datascrapingservices.com?

Customized and segmented lists to match your goals.

GDPR and CAN-SPAM compliant data sourcing.

High deliverability rates, verified through email hygiene practices.

Affordable packages for startups, agencies, and enterprise-level clients.

If your business is looking to market effectively to legal professionals who specialize in bankruptcy law across the United States, our Verified Bankruptcy Lawyers Email List is your ideal starting point.

📧 Reach out atinfo@datascrapingservices.com 🌐 Visit us at Datascrapingservices.com — where legal data meets marketing intelligence.

[vergess]

It's not surprising the people who complained about "ludite" give barely a shit about animators and artists. The instant the discussion touched on copyright, you could almost hear them go "Oh, finally, I can pretend the artists are bourgeois again..." They were aching to find an excuses to kick out artists from discussion on labor...

It's right up there with people gleefully insisting that lawyers and scientists are bourgeois.

No, asshole, just because you don't understand the work someone is doing ,that doesn't mean it's not work!!!!

I really love the idea of AI art. I'm seriously disabled and losing function over time, and while that process could ostensibly be halted and reversed, I don't have the money for it.

An AI art generator trained entirely on public domain and donated art would be an amazing tool for me to illustrate my writing without having to re-learn how to draw with my new tremors and lack of gross motor control. And there are TONS of ENTIRELY PUBLIC DOMAIN datasets out there, literally intended to make that possible!

But it's not as lucrative as copying the work of living artists and charging less than they can.

Every single thing about the AI art debate should be phrased in terms of artists' stolen labour, but it's not.

And it makes me fucking rabid. It's disgusting! It shows just how little most of the people talking about this issue actually care of know about the technology, the law, or the artists being impoverished.

It's a good thing Ireland started giving artists Universal Basic Income payments, because at the rate things are moving, that may be the only solution available in the short term.

In the long term, there needs to be either an anti-capitalist revolution, or at the very least there need to be stringent requirements for AI training data to be scraped from the public domain or given to the training set willingly and knowingly by the artists.

Additionally, while we're stuck in late capitalist hell, the artists who offer their work as data for training should receive residuals every time that data is used to train another AI. The name of each artists who trained it should be disclosed to anyone who uses that AI.

Note also my use of "artists" and not "IP holders."

IP holders are often non-human entities themselves: corporations.

The humans who created the training data should be compensated fairly, but instead it's just theft after theft.

[lookwhatilost]

i feel like the dri & booze situation is one that’s relatively unusual and is going to require a more creative solution that hasn’t been fielded with her. so, not 12 step, which complicates things it’s really hard to get streamlined information on clinical treatment that doesn’t use this model, in part because 12 step is so hegemonic. she needs something more customized than that. what i want to do when she’s calmed down a bit is have a couple options that she wouldn’t have had presented to her *checks notes* 9 year tenure in and out of 12 step programs. i don’t know why anyone is shocked that this hasn’t been helpful.

i’ve known dri for years at this point and am way more familiar with how this works than i ever wanted to be. so i’m of two minds: my less than charitable opinion, which is my broad one, and the one that’s more tailored to this and more relevant.

the mean one is more fun to type: go to an article where a conservative writer is railing against grc, toss out the bit about kiddie tiddies and just grab the ones that are pretending to be objective, that allude to rates of regret that aren’t being reported, lack of supporting evidence, that this is being pushed as the only answer when therapy is more appropriate, that it’s ideologically driven, that it’s profiting off a vulnerable group of repeat customers. perennial classics, i’ve sure we’ve all seen them. now go in and play some mad libs, replace “woke gender experimental surgeries” or whatever dogwhistle the author shit out after they drank their coffee this morning with “12 step”. and congratulations, they’re correct statements now.

i’m oversimplifying a bit here, but there are some serious issues with the all of the data, that would be present in any group that only keeps estimates of its membership – how very convenient for them. so you get wildly variant estimates about the program’s success, with figures ranging from 5% to 91%. that should make any reasonable person suspicious of them. and then orgs like AA will self-publish 75% percent success rate – broken down that’s 50% for don’t relapse after attending, and another 25% who slip then recover – but say things in weasel words “for those who seriously work the program”, which the fine print will tell you is 20-40% of attendees at the meeting. AA groups are also autonomous. the norms in one church basement aren’t going to be the same ones down the road, so what are the criteria they’re holding these people to? there’s a lot of weird shit like this, like the very fun fact that AA is 45 years older than the first substance use disorder diagnosis. and all 12 step programs are the AA formula smacked out something else. it’s a rabbit hole.

what’s relevant here is that 12 step is designed for one specific expression of alcoholism, and adrienne isn’t a patient like that.

like, someone who just got divorced, kids taken from them and their house foreclosed on, someone who’s living in their car, the kind of people who don’t have anywhere else to turn to. this program is made for. it’s the people who can’t stop no matter what and who can’t moderate no matter what, who need complete abstinence. people’ve lost real things because of this.

dri has gotten... um. she’s gotten seriously physically injured multiple times, and she’s had some very alarming experiences with other symptoms after a binge, and i know she knows it’s not a good sign that she’s getting labs all the time. but in terms of things she won’t be able to realistically bounce back from? well, the second DUI did bleed her savings, but she also scraped together the funds for a very well connected lawyer who talked it down to a first offense. so. inpatient recovery stint in december argued as time served. 6 months of probation. complete IOP. 4 months total license suspension, 12 months ignition interlock when the restricted license comes back. $5k fine. judge saying “i just hope i never see you in here again”. a lot of situations like that, where they were nowhere near as bad as they could have realistically been. and the point is more common ground with the group. she isn’t going to engage with this. when she was still in IOP, sometimes she’d come home and comment “damn, some of these people actually ruined their lives”

so, people who the program is designed for don’t really have the privilege of nitpicking it because this is pretty much it for them, and what else are they realistically are going to do? but dri is going to immediately going to look at this and think “why do i have to go on a tour of shame if this is something out of my hands?” and tear into it further like “it doesn’t matter if you change ‘god’ to ‘higher power’ if you’re still talking about an external locus of control. just because it’s woke god now doesn’t mean this isn’t spiritual”. whenever there’s a “bitch ex-wife guy” (apparently every meeting has one) she’s not going to find this relatable because this dude is 2.5 decades older than her and custody battles are something she knows nothing about, and finds the chatter depressing at best, or at worst, sort of looks at some of the more extreme cases and quietly exonerates herself. even when people are in her age group, she doesn’t seem to like them very much. her AA sponsor in 2020 told her that “this year is bad because people were chanting ‘i can’t breathe’ in the streets, which is a black magic spell”. she stopped going after that. for every encounter she had with someone there she thought was interesting, there were 10 more events she took issue with. she just doesn’t like the premise. and i’m still going back and forth on whether the health stuff is abstract to her, or she doesn’t want to think about it, or if she’s just sort of giving up on it. but she’s still shut in our room and she’s been crying on and off for most of the day, so i know she feels awful about herself.

so, i’ve just been writing this out to sort of get my ideas down and spitball what isn’t working, just based on what she’s told me about. and i want to approach her with some language i know she’s probably going to be more responsive to, and i think what i’m sticking with is “you’ve caught a lot of breaks with this, but you only need to get really unlucky with it one time”.

because that’s sort of what my concern is. this is usually the cycle with her: she relapses, and something scares her out of drinking for a while. then some time goes on, and eventually the initial shock wears off. this can be anywhere between 2 weeks to around 6 months depending on how scared she is. then she starts getting stressed, she’ll want to drink and numb it. i can reliably talk her out of it if she expresses this to me, but i also can’t babysit her all the time. this will be persistent, sometimes it goes nowhere. sometimes she’ll pop in somewhere after her shift, and... she’s chugged 8 drinks in the past hour and she can barely form a sentence and is incredibly disoriented, which means she’s liable to fall over and hurt herself, and she’ll just walk around with a gash on her face that’s gushing blood and she doesn’t seem to notice it happened. or she’s put herself in a sketchy situation with people she 100% should not trust because they’re buying her more alcohol and she’s totally lost the thread of what’s going on. already, she’s fallen through a glass door and shattered it, she’s chipped a significant portion off two of her teeth, she faceplanted directly on her glasses and broke them and she still has a scar on her nose where the frame dug into her face, she’s had her drinks drugged, twice, and there’s this story she doesn’t take seriously at all where she describes what is almost certainly an attempted sexual assault, and she’s not reading it that way because she was too zonked out to realize that, no, that stranger carrying you into your apartment when you’re inebriated and getting weird with you is trying to take advantage of you. babe, this is really bad.

her falling into traffic, or tripping into the canal and drowning, or just passing out when it’s cold out and freezing, or anything like that is very low probability, but she only needs to get unlucky once. what’s more likely is that she gets seriously injured. she breaks her jaw, or her nose, or her arm. or she pokes one of her eyes out. or one of her drinks gets drugged again, but no one intervenes this time, and god knows what follows. like, i’m not pulling this out of my ass. she’s had close calls with all of these. and she only needs to get unlucky once.

the good news in all of this is that dri has trended upwards in the sobriety periods. she could barely go a few days without drinking in 2019 and be on a bender for a week or more. now, she might not have had 9 months of consecutive sobriety, but 21 days this year, only spanning 2-3 day intervals at a time, spread out – she’s doing better. but i get worried that she could backslide, and i think she needs something more tailored to her specifically so she can learn how to get out of that thinking cycle. because she needs to do this consistently so she can get the momentum she needs to put this behind her.

so, thinking about some things that she might find appealing or that will help her. RPT seems like a good place to start that she’d benefit from the most, so i need to find a cbt practitioner who has experience with this. i could see REBT working too. i know she probably should try to get back on antidepressants, but i know she doesn’t feel they do anything, so that’s irritating. although i could see her feeling more favorably towards ketamine, because it tends to work more immediately. insurance doesn’t cover that, but we might be able to figure something out. some clinics do payment plans that are a bit more doable for us. i’m not sure how she feels about vivitrol or acamprosate, but they’re on the table too. smart is probably a better fit for her than anything 12 step, if she hasn’t given up on groups, because it’s more based in cbt principles and would be a good compliment to whatever form of talk therapy she thinks makes the most sense. or even just little things in addition to this, like giving her a day planner where she can just keep track of what’s a sober day, what’s a day where she drank, what’s a day where she binged, and just make notes about things like cravings, stressors, etc. she tends to respond better to something tangible, and being able to have a written documentation of this can give her a better handle on her patterns. or encouraging her to get the gym membership she’s been mentioning periodically since she began living here. 

she’s going to figure it out. i know she will. i know she’s going to have a breakthrough with this someday. i bookmarked some stuff related to these and i’ll show it to her in the morning.

[actowizsolutions0]

Lawyer Data Scraping Services: The Key to Smarter Legal Insights

In the legal industry, access to accurate and updated information is crucial. Whether you're a law firm, researcher, or legal analyst, having comprehensive data at your fingertips can significantly improve decision-making. This is where lawyer data scraping services come into play. These services help extract valuable legal data from various sources, streamlining research and enhancing efficiency.

Why Do You Need Lawyer Data Scraping?

Lawyer data scraping is an advanced technique used to collect information from legal directories, court databases, attorney profiles, and law firm websites. By leveraging this service, you can:

Gather details of legal professionals, including their expertise, contact information, and case history.

Monitor legal trends and analyze case outcomes.

Keep up with changes in law firm structures and attorney movements.

Automate data collection for legal marketing and research.

Key Benefits of Lawyer Data Scraping Services

1. Enhanced Legal Research

Scraping legal data provides easy access to case summaries, judgments, and court filings, allowing legal professionals to stay informed.

2. Competitor & Market Analysis

For law firms looking to stay ahead, scraping lawyer and firm data can offer insights into competitors’ activities, helping refine strategies.

3. Time & Cost Efficiency

Manual data extraction is time-consuming and prone to errors. Automated data scraping ensures accuracy while saving valuable time.

4. Improved Lead Generation

With access to attorney and law firm directories, firms can identify potential clients or partnerships, streamlining their outreach efforts.

Industries Benefiting from Lawyer Data Scraping

Legal Research Firms – Gain instant access to extensive case records.

Law Firms – Analyze competition, recruit talent, and monitor legal trends.

Marketing Agencies – Generate leads from attorney listings and legal networks.

Insurance Companies – Verify legal credentials and case histories.

Related Data Scraping Services

Actowiz Solutions offers a range of web scraping services beyond legal data extraction. Check out our other services:

Extract Stock & Finance Data – Stay ahead in financial markets with real-time data extraction.

Yellow Pages Data Scraping – Collect business leads from directories effortlessly.

Website Price Scraper – Monitor product prices across e-commerce platforms.

Web Scraping News Articles – Extract news updates for media analysis and trend tracking.

Get Started with Lawyer Data Scraping

If you’re looking for reliable and efficient lawyer data scraping services, Actowiz Solutions is here to help. Our cutting-edge tools ensure accurate data extraction tailored to your needs. Contact us today and transform the way you access legal data!

[lawyersdatascraping]

Verified Alaska Lawyers Email Database

Verified Alaska Lawyers Email Database

Verified Alaska Lawyers Email Database: Empowering Legal Marketing. In the competitive legal industry, targeted and effective communication is essential for success. Lawyersdatalab.com presents the Verified Alaska Lawyers Email Database, a comprehensive resource designed to streamline law firm marketing and support legal marketing agencies. Whether you’re looking to expand your client base or connect with specialized attorneys in Alaska, this email database is your gateway to impactful marketing. 

What Does the Database Include? 

TheVerified Alaska Lawyers Email Database offers precise and up-to-date information, including: 

- Full names of lawyers and firms. 

- Verified email addresses. 

- Contact numbers. 

- Practice areas and specialties. 

- Office addresses. 

- Bar membership details. 

- Years of experience. 

- Firm size and structure. 

This structured and accurate data enables you to connect with the right legal professionals seamlessly. 

How It Benefits Law Firms and Legal Marketing Companies?

1. Targeted Outreach: 

With practice areas and contact details at your fingertips, you can tailor your marketing campaigns to reach specific audiences, such as personal injury lawyers, corporate attorneys, or criminal defense lawyers. 

2. Enhanced Lead Generation: 

Access to verified contact information minimizes time wasted on incorrect leads, allowing you to focus on prospects most likely to convert. 

3. Cost Efficiency: 

By directly connecting with potential clients or partners, law firms can reduce marketing expenses and increase ROI. 

4. Improved Networking: 

Legal marketing agencies can use this database to build strong relationships with Alaska-based attorneys, facilitating partnerships and collaborations. 

5. Compliance and Reliability: 

Lawyers Data Lab  ensures the database adheres to legal and ethical standards, providing only verified and authorized information. 

Why Choose LawyersDataLab.com? 

Our expertise in data scraping and cleansing guarantees high-quality, reliable data that empowers your marketing efforts. We understand the unique challenges of legal marketing and provide solutions tailored to meet these demands. 

Popular Lawyers Mailing List

Verified South Dakota Lawyers Email List

Washington Attorney Contact List

Alabama Attorney Email Database

Delaware Lawyers Email List

Louisiana Lawyers Email List

Email List of Lawyers in Wyoming

South Dakota Attorneys Email List

Ohio Lawyers Mailing List

Verified Alaska Lawyers Email Database

Verified Alabama Lawyers Email List

Conclusion 

The Verified Alaska Lawyers Email Database is more than just a list; it’s a tool for driving growth and success. Whether you’re a law firm seeking to expand your client base or a legal marketing company aiming to deliver results, this database is the strategic resource you need. 

📩 Contact us today at info@lawyersdatalab.com to learn more! 

[datascraping001]

Unlock Growth Opportunities with a Verified Bankruptcy Lawyers Email List – USA

Unlock Growth Opportunities with a Verified Bankruptcy Lawyers Email List – USA

🌐 Website: Datascrapingservices.com 📧 Email: info@datascrapingservices.com

In the competitive landscape of legal marketing, reaching the right professionals with targeted, reliable data is crucial. When your business or service caters to the legal industry, especially the field of bankruptcy law, a Verified Bankruptcy Lawyers Email List (USA) is an invaluable resource to connect with decision-makers quickly and efficiently. At Datascrapingservices.com, we specialize in delivering well-segmented, up-to-date, and fully verified email databases to power your outreach campaigns.

🎯 Why Target Bankruptcy Lawyers?

Bankruptcy lawyers play a critical role in helping individuals and businesses navigate financial hardship. They work closely with debtors, creditors, and courts, making them valuable prospects for a range of services—from legal tech and financial planning tools to B2B software, document automation solutions, continuing legal education (CLE) providers, and more.

Our Verified Bankruptcy Lawyers Email List gives you direct access to thousands of licensed attorneys and law firms across the United States, allowing you to reach your niche audience with precision.

🗂️ Key Data Fields Included:

Attorney Name

Law Firm Name

Verified Email Address

Phone Number

Area of Practice (Bankruptcy, Chapter 7, Chapter 11, Chapter 13, etc.)

Office Address (City, State, Zip)

Website URL

Bar Membership Details

Social Media Profiles (LinkedIn, if available)

Years of Experience / License Date

All our data is verified for accuracy and freshness, ensuring maximum deliverability and engagement with your campaigns.

✅ Benefits of the Bankruptcy Lawyers Email List

1. Hyper-Targeted Marketing Instead of broad legal outreach, focus your campaigns directly on attorneys who specialize in bankruptcy law.

2. Save Time & Resources Avoid hours of manual research or costly ad targeting experiments. Our ready-to-use list saves time and accelerates your outreach efforts.

3. Boost ROI Whether you're marketing legal software, consulting services, or continuing education programs, reaching a focused audience increases your chances of achieving better ROI.

4. Expand Your Legal Network Build long-term professional relationships with attorneys, firms, and bankruptcy law experts who may require your services repeatedly or on retainer.

5. Easy Integration with Marketing Tools Import the list seamlessly into your CRM, email marketing tools, or LinkedIn outreach platforms to streamline your workflow and automate follow-ups.

6. Up-to-Date & Compliant Our lists are updated regularly to ensure accuracy and are compiled with respect for privacy and compliance standards.

Popular Email List

Verified Dentist Email List

Verified Mortgage Officer Email List

Weedmaps Dispensaries Email List

Bankruptcy Email List

Primary Schools Email List USA

Canadian Doctors Email List

Texas Lawyers Email List

Personal Injury Lawyer Email List

Hotel Email Lists

USA Students Email List Scraping

Best Verified Bankruptcy Lawyers Email List Services in USA:

Denver, Fresno, Bakersfield, Mesa, Indianapolis, Atlanta, Fort Worth, Washington, Orlando, Long Beach, Austin, Houston, San Jose, Tulsa, Omaha, Wichita, San Antonio, Fresno, Long Beach, Philadelphia, Louisville, Chicago, San Francisco, Colorado, New Orleans, Sacramento, Dallas, Las Vegas, El Paso, Charlotte, Milwaukee, Oklahoma City, Raleigh, Columbus, Jacksonville, Seattle, Memphis, Sacramento, Virginia Beach, Nashville, Boston, Tucson and New York.

🔧 Why Choose Datascrapingservices.com?

Customized and segmented lists to match your goals.

GDPR and CAN-SPAM compliant data sourcing.

High deliverability rates, verified through email hygiene practices.

Affordable packages for startups, agencies, and enterprise-level clients.

If your business is looking to market effectively to legal professionals who specialize in bankruptcy law across the United States, our Verified Bankruptcy Lawyers Email List is your ideal starting point.

📧 Reach out atinfo@datascrapingservices.com 🌐 Visit us at Datascrapingservices.com — where legal data meets marketing intelligence.

[orbemnews]

Clearview AI’s Facial-Recognition App Called Illegal in Canada The facial recognition app Clearview AI is not welcome in Canada and the company that developed it should delete Canadians’ faces from its database, the country’s privacy commissioner said on Wednesday. “What Clearview does is mass surveillance, and it is illegal,” Commissioner Daniel Therrien said at a news conference. He forcefully denounced the company as putting all of society “continually in a police lineup.” Though the Canadian government does not have legal authority to enforce photo removal, the position — the strongest one an individual country has taken against the company — was clear: “This is completely unacceptable.” Clearview scraped more than three billion photos from social media networks and other public websites in order to build a facial recognition app that is now used by over 2,400 U.S. law enforcement agencies, according to the company. When an officer runs a search, the app provides links to sites on the web where the person’s face has appeared. The scope of the company’s reach and law enforcement application was first reported by The New York Times in January 2020. Mr. Therrien, along with three regional privacy commissioners in Canada, began an investigation into Clearview a year ago, after the article on the company was published. Privacy laws in Canada require getting people’s consent to use their personal data, giving the government grounds to pursue an inquiry. Authorities in Australia and the United Kingdom are jointly pursuing an inquiry of their own. Dozens of law enforcement agencies and organizations across Canada used the app, according to the commissioners, including the national Royal Canadian Mounted Police. One Canadian law enforcement officer told The Times last year that it was “the biggest breakthrough in the last decade” for investigating child sexual abuse crimes. “Thousands of searches” were conducted, a report from the commissioners said, but only one agency was paying for the app, mainly because a number of groups used it through a free trial. According to the commissioners’ report, Clearview said that it did not need consent from Canadians to use facial biometric information, because that information came from photos that were on the public internet. There is an exception in the privacy law for publicly available information. The commission disagreed. “Information collected from public websites, such as social media or professional profiles, and then used for an unrelated purpose, does not fall under the ‘publicly available’ exception,” according to the report. The commissioners objected to the images being used in a way that the posters of the photos hadn’t intended and in a way that could “create the risk of significant harm to those individuals.” Clearview AI said that it planned to challenge the determination in court. “Clearview AI only collects public information from the Internet which is explicitly permitted,” Doug Mitchell, a lawyer for Clearview AI, said in a statement. “Clearview AI is a search engine that collects public data just as much larger companies do, including Google, which is permitted to operate in Canada.” The commissioners, who noted that they don’t have the power to fine companies or make orders, sent a “letter of intention” to Clearview AI telling it to cease offering its facial recognition services in Canada, cease the scraping of Canadians’ faces, and to delete images already collected. That is a difficult order: It’s not possible to tell someone’s nationality or where they live from their face alone. Hoan Ton-That, the chief executive of Clearview AI, said Wednesday that because of the inquiry, the company stopped operating in Canada last July, but had no plans to proactively delete Canadians from its database. The company has previously taken pains to delete faces after running afoul of local privacy laws. Last year, Clearview was sued in Illinois for violating that state’s Biometric Information Privacy Act, which says that companies must get people’s consent before using images of their faces. Clearview tried to delete Illinois residents’ faces by, for example, looking at photo metadata and geographical information. It also allows state residents to request removal by uploading photos of themselves via an “opt-out form.” Mr. Ton-That said Clearview allows Canadians to opt out of the database the same way. Mr. Therrien was not satisfied with that solution. “You realize the irony of the remedy, requiring individuals to provide further personal information about themselves,” he said. Mr. Ton-That said he was eager to fight the finding in court. “This is a simple issue of public information and who has access to it and why,” he said. “We don’t want a world where it’s just Google and a few other tech companies accessing public information.” Source link Orbem News #AIs #app #Called #Canada #Clearview #FacialRecognition #Illegal

[technicalsolutions88]

Europe’s top court has made a ruling that could affect scores of websites that embed the Facebook ‘Like’ button and receive visitors from the region.

The ruling by the Court of Justice of the EU states such sites are jointly responsible for the initial data processing — and must either obtain informed consent from site visitors prior to data being transferred to Facebook, or be able to demonstrate a legitimate interest legal basis for processing this data.

The ruling is significant because, as currently seems to be the case, Facebook’s Like buttons transfer personal data automatically, when a webpage loads — without the user even needing to interact with the plug-in — which means if websites are relying on visitors’ ‘consenting’ to their data being shared with Facebook they will likely need to change how the plug-in functions to ensure no data is sent to Facebook prior to visitors being asked if they want their browsing to be tracked by the adtech giant.

The background to the case is a complaint against online clothes retailer, Fashion ID, by a German consumer protection association, Verbraucherzentrale NRW — which took legal action in 2015 seeking an injunction against Fashion ID’s use of the plug-in which it claimed breached European data protection law.

Like ’em or loath ’em, Facebook’s ‘Like’ buttons are an impossible-to-miss component of the mainstream web. Though most Internet users are likely unaware that the social plug-ins are used by Facebook to track what other websites they’re visiting for ad targeting purposes.

Last year the company told the UK parliament that between April 9 and April 16 the button had appeared on 8.4M websites, while its Share button social plug-in appeared on 931K sites. (Facebook also admitted to 2.2M instances of another tracking tool it uses to harvest non-Facebook browsing activity — called a Facebook Pixel — being invisibly embedded on third party websites.)

The Fashion ID case predates the introduction of the EU’s updated privacy framework, GDPR, which further toughens the rules around obtaining consent — meaning it must be purpose specific, informed and freely given.

Today’s CJEU decision also follows another ruling a year ago, in a case related to Facebook fan pages, when the court took a broad view of privacy responsibilities around platforms — saying both fan page administrators and host platforms could be data controllers. Though it also said joint controllership does not necessarily imply equal responsibility for each party.

In the latest decision the CJEU has sought to draw some limits on the scope of joint responsibility, finding that a website where the Facebook Like button is embedded cannot be considered a data controller for any subsequent processing, i.e. after the data has been transmitted to Facebook Ireland (the data controller for Facebook’s European users).

The joint responsibility specifically covers the collection and transmission of Facebook Like data to Facebook Ireland.

“It seems, at the outset, impossible that Fashion ID determines the purposes and means of those operations,” the court writes in a press release announcing the decision.

“By contrast, Fashion ID can be considered to be a controller jointly with Facebook Ireland in respect of the operations involving the collection and disclosure by transmission to Facebook Ireland of the data at issue, since it can be concluded (subject to the investigations that it is for the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf [German regional court] to carry out) that Fashion ID and Facebook Ireland determine jointly the means and purposes of those operations.”

Responding the judgement in a statement attributed to its associate general counsel, Jack Gilbert, Facebook told us:

Website plugins are common and important features of the modern Internet. We welcome the clarity that today’s decision brings to both websites and providers of plugins and similar tools. We are carefully reviewing the court’s decision and will work closely with our partners to ensure they can continue to benefit from our social plugins and other business tools in full compliance with the law.

The company said it may make changes to the Like button to ensure websites that use it are able to comply with Europe’s GDPR.

Though it’s not clear what specific changes these could be, such as — for example — whether Facebook will change the code of its social plug-ins to ensure no data is transferred at the point a page loads. (We’ve asked Facebook and will update this report with any response.)

Facebook also points out that other tech giants, such as Twitter and LinkedIn, deploy similar social plug-ins — suggesting the CJEU ruling will apply to other social platforms, as well as to thousands of websites across the EU where these sorts of plug-ins crop up.

“Sites with the button should make sure that they are sufficiently transparent to site visitors, and must make sure that they have a lawful basis for the transfer of the user’s personal data (e.g. if just the user’s IP address and other data stored on the user’s device by Facebook cookies) to Facebook,” Neil Brown, a telecoms, tech and internet lawyer at U.K. law firm Decoded Legal, told TechCrunch.

“If their lawful basis is consent, then they’ll need to get consent before deploying the button for it to be valid — otherwise, they’ll have done the transfer before the visitor has consented

“If relying on legitimate interests — which might scrape by — then they’ll need to have done a legitimate interests assessment, and kept it on file (against the (admittedly unlikely) day that a regulator asks to see it), and they’ll need to have a mechanism by which a site visitor can object to the transfer.”

“Basically, if organisations are taking on board the recent guidance from the ICO and CNIL on cookie compliance, wrapping in Facebook ‘Like’ and other similar things in with that work would be sensible,” Brown added.

Also commenting on the judgement, Michael Veale, a UK-based researcher in tech and privacy law/policy, said it raises questions about how Facebook will comply with Europe’s data protection framework for any further processing it carries out of the social plug-in data.

“The whole judgement to me leaves open the question ‘on what grounds can Facebook justify further processing of data from their web tracking code?'” he told us. “If they have to provide transparency for this further processing, which would take them out of joint controllership into sole controllership, to whom and when is it provided?

“If they have to demonstrate they would win a legitimate interests test, how will that be affected by the difficulty in delivering that transparency to data subjects?’

“Can Facebook do a backflip and say that for users of their service, their terms of service on their platform justifies the further use of data for which individuals must have separately been made aware of by the website where it was collected?

“The question then quite clearly boils down to non-users, or to users who are effectively non-users to Facebook through effective use of technologies such as Mozilla’s browser tab isolation.”

How far a tracking pixel could be considered a ‘similar device’ to a cookie is another question to consider, he said.

The tracking of non-Facebook users via social plug-ins certainly continues to be a hot-button legal issue for Facebook in Europe — where the company has twice lost in court to Belgium’s privacy watchdog on this issue. (Facebook has continued to appeal.)

Facebook’s tracking of non-users ruled illegal again

Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg also faced questions about tracking non-users last year, from MEPs in the European Parliament — who pressed him on whether Facebook uses data on non-users for any other uses vs the security purpose of “keeping bad content out” that he claimed requires Facebook to track everyone on the mainstream Internet.

MEPs also wanted to know how non-users can stop their data being transferred to Facebook? Zuckerberg gave no answer, likely because there’s currently no way for non-users to stop their data being sucked up by Facebook’s servers — short of staying off the mainstream Internet.

from Social – TechCrunch https://ift.tt/3116CC1 Original Content From: https://techcrunch.com

[silvertipmountaincenter]

Subsidized housing renters pay price in roaches, mold, leaks

In this Feb. 20, 2019 photo, Destiny Johnson shows the broken door to her oven that she uses string to hold together, in her apartment in Cedarhurst Homes, a federally subsidized, low-income apartment complex in Natchez, Miss. The complex failed a health and safety inspection in each of the past three years. Upset with conditions, Johnson moved out in late March. (Rogelio V. Solis/Associated Press)

NATCHEZ, Miss. — In this city known for pre-Civil War mansions, a young mother shared a government-funded apartment with her three small children and a legion of cockroaches.

They lurked in the medicine cabinet, under the refrigerator, behind a picture on the wall. The mother nudged a bedroom dresser and more roaches skittered away as her 2-year-old son stomped on them.

It was home, sweet home for Destiny Johnson and her kids — until she got fed up and moved out last month.

Inspectors had cited the apartment complex with urgent health and safety violations for the past three years. Yet the federal government continued to pay Johnson’s rent at a property where a three-bedroom unit like hers can run $900 a month.

“I’m not asking for the best,” she told a reporter weeks before leaving, “but something better than this, especially for these kids.”

Health and safety inspection scores at taxpayer-funded apartments assigned to low-income tenants have been declining for years, typically with no serious consequences for landlords, an Associated Press analysis of federal housing data shows.

Johnson’s former apartment is one of nearly 160,000 at private properties with federal contracts that have failed at least one inspection since 1999. Nationwide data show the vast majority of failing inspections involved urgent violations. They can range from electrical hazards to rampant vermin to piles of garbage.

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development subsidizes rents for tenants assigned to both privately owned apartments and public housing run by state or local authorities. Many in these 2.1 million households are disabled, elderly or single parents. As the nation’s biggest affordable housing provider, the federal government will spend about $18 billion this year for these two programs.

Yet tenants curse heaters that don’t heat, emergency exits that don’t open, windows that don’t close. They complain of rats, rust, holes and mold.

In 2015 alone, families living in subsidized housing reported at least 155,000 more cases of childhood asthma than expected if the rate were the same as for renters in other households, according to AP’s analysis of a national tenant survey. Medical studies tie asthma to mold.

Federal authorities acknowledge the long slide in inspection scores, which started a decade ago in the privately owned housing. They say in recent years they have been protecting tenants by reinspecting sites with surprisingly high scores and closely monitoring repairs.

“These older properties,” Housing and Urban Development spokesman Brian Sullivan said, “the private owners may not have the means to do needed repairs.”

Conditions have deteriorated so badly in many subsidized buildings that by the government’s own estimate it would take tens of billions of dollars to rehabilitate them.

___

Destiny Johnson lived with her children ages 1, 2, and 5, at Cedarhurst Homes on a dead-end street in Natchez, where Mississippi River trading and wealth built on slave plantations have yielded to inveterate poverty among a largely black population.

The heater in Johnson’s apartment didn’t work, so she was using the oven to keep warm until a stovetop fire last year. Johnson, 21, said she tried to use her fire extinguisher, but that didn’t work either, so she rushed to borrow one from a neighbor.

The oven still hadn’t been replaced several months later. Its door was tied closed with a bright pink cord.

In late March, she said, management finally provided a letter that let her move to a nearby subsidized complex with a better inspection record.

“I couldn’t take it anymore,” Johnson said.

A former neighbor who still lives at the 30-unit Cedarhurst Homes, Whitley Williams, wanted to show a reporter and photographer her leaking water heater. The door to its closet was damp and swollen. She tried to heave it open, but the bottom scraped the floor and broke apart.

Her three children prefer to stay elsewhere, with her father.

Federal records list the site owner as The Columbia Property Group, which has managed or owned at least 66 federally contracted properties in Georgia, Florida and its home state of Mississippi.

Company President Melanie Moe referred questions to Bryan King, an officer at Mississippi-based Triangle Development, LLC. In an emailed statement, King said his development company was acquiring Cedarhurst Homes and planned to pursue federal tax credits for a “large renovation.”

The property earned inspection scores of 46, 53, and 54 out of a possible 100 from 2016 through 2018, federal data show. Any score up to 60 is now considered failing. At least three other Columbia Property Group sites have failed inspections since 2011, federal records show.

Federally subsidized private apartments, where tenants typically pay about a third of their income, fare worst in the South. Louisiana had the nation’s highest inspection failure rate at 12%, with Mississippi second at 10%.

Housing experts say landlords in poor, rural communities with low rents can have trouble amassing cash for repairs, despite federal payments.

Nationally, inspection scores at privately owned complexes like Cedarhurst Homes reached a peak of 90 in 2007 during the George W. Bush administration. Scores averaged 86 during Barack Obama’s two terms and 81 under President Trump as of June. AP’s analysis of historical trends uses data released in January. Since then, HUD has been revising its databases and released one that isn’t directly comparable and drops pertinent inspections.

Federal housing officials partly attribute the recent drop in scores to their crackdown on substandard repairs and inflated inspection scores . Under Trump, 92% of inspections found a violation, up from 85% under Obama and 77% under Bush.

Federal housing officials also say their new approach has driven up some scores as managers understand they must take repairs seriously.

In a March report , however, the Government Accountability Office told Congress that HUD’s inspection processes are outdated and need a thorough overhaul to ensure stronger oversight of building conditions.

And tenants in some buildings still complain that management hides problems from inspectors, covering cracks with duct tape, mold with a quick coat of paint, or even old junk with temporary partitions.

Michael Kane, executive director of the National Alliance of HUD Tenants, acknowledged the department has gotten tougher on inspections but said the decline in scores reflects continued deterioration of living conditions.

“As the buildings age, they develop certain kinds of problems. They didn’t have water leaks and mold at the beginning, but they sure … did 40 years later,” he said.

Federal officials acknowledge they must think hard before taking enforcement action that might shutter a property. The federal government ended most of its efforts to build new affordable housing in the 1980s, and private-sector financing for new construction has long been scarce.

HUD’s main programs now rely on the existing, gradually aging housing stock. “We lose the affordable housing forever. You never get it back,” HUD spokesman Sullivan said.

Since the start of 2016, he said, the agency has terminated 36 housing contracts. There are now about 24,000.

Most failing sites get what amounts to a warning and multiple chances to correct violations.

“Yet what’s going to save these programs is aggressive enforcement,” says Linda Couch, a housing policy official at the elderly advocacy group LeadingAge.

___

Job cuts over decades have hobbled HUD’s enforcement efforts from within.

“You could walk around all the offices and see all the empty desks where people used to work,” said Merryl Gibbs, a lawyer who enforced anti-discrimination housing law before retiring from the department in 2016.

The Trump administration proposed deep cuts in department funding as recently as March, but Congress has resisted.

Spending for HUD’s main housing programs is expected to increase about 2% to nearly $40 billion this year, by AP’s calculation. The total includes a third program that gives vouchers to another 2.2 million households, letting tenants pick a unit on the private market.

Many housing advocates want more vouchers and incentives for private landlords to accept them. Others suggest increasing tax credits for construction and repairs, more federal staff and resources for better oversight, and more tenant participation in site improvements.

HUD Secretary Ben Carson has acknowledged a drastic shortage of low-cost housing and stressed the federal role. A physician by training, Carson has also pointed to the connection between residential mold and asthma.

That tie is supported in federal data. The share of U.S. households reporting mold was higher in subsidized rentals than other rentals, according to the latest data available from the American Housing Survey. Meanwhile, 13% of subsidized rental households reported at least one child with asthma, compared with 7% for other rentals. The differences hold even accounting for family size and poverty.

Housing advocates say funding remains the bottom line.

“We try and come up with solutions that don’t cost anything,” said Priya Jayachandran, a former senior administrator at HUD and now president of the National Housing Trust. “The answer is money.”

___

On a recent visit to Baltimore’s Rosemont Tower for elderly or disabled tenants, stairwells were littered with plastic caps for needles used to inject heroin.

Tenants in this federally funded public housing complained of bedbugs and mice. Signs saying “mandatory fire watch” alerted residents that the sprinkler system was broken, requiring a firefighter to stand watch around the clock.

A recurrent leak has sopped a prized Oriental rug and spread mold into the living room of Della Thomas.

“Every time there’s a real heavy rain, the ceiling gets a big bubble, and it starts to leak. They just kind of patch it up until the next time,” said Thomas, 64. She pointed to a plastic trash can, saying management provided it to catch drips.

Ingrid Antonio, a spokeswoman for the Housing Authority of Baltimore City, said security guards make regular rounds and pest extermination happens at least every three months. She said stairwells are cleaned daily.

To increase funds for repairs, however, the building will be converted to private ownership in coming months but remain subsidized housing, she said.

Inspectors gave the 200-unit high-rise a failing score of 25 in 2017. That jumped to 71 last year, according to the housing authority, though urgent violations and smoke detector problems persisted. A reinspection was planned for later this year.

Of 37 Baltimore public housing sites, 22 failed their last inspection, according to data from HUD and the housing authority.

“Steadily declining federal investment in public housing for more than a decade has taken a tremendous toll,” the city’s housing authority said in a statement.

Largely due to Baltimore’s blighted complexes, since 2013 Maryland had the country’s highest inspection failure rate for public housing at 32%. The District of Columbia was second at 29%. The national average was 10%.

Around the country, inspection scores at public housing have fallen under both Democratic and Republican administrations. Scores averaged 89 during Obama’s second term, dropping to 79 under Trump through March 2018.

HUD’s most recent estimate, from 2010, concluded that public housing needed about $25.6 billion in large-scale repairs and at least $3.4 billion more each year. That would have added up to well over $50 billion by now. Instead, Congress has restricted repair spending to $23.5 billion.

The federal government also has tried to avoid expensive takeovers.

HUD knew for years of broken appliances, pests, racial discrimination and other “deplorable conditions” at buildings run by the Alexander County Housing Authority in southern Illinois, according to the agency’s inspector general. It wasn’t until 2016 that department officials finally took control.

By then, they needed to close four complexes and relocate hundreds of residents.

___

Donn reported from Plymouth, Massachusetts. David McFadden in Baltimore contributed.

___

Reach Jeff Donn on Twitter at https://twitter.com/jadonn7

Copyright 2019 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Reporting the facts for over 140 years.

Already a subscriber? Sign in

Source Article

The post Subsidized housing renters pay price in roaches, mold, leaks appeared first on Tips On Locating Luxury Apartments For Rent In-Washington-DC.

More Info At: http://www.silvertipmountaincenter.com/subsidized-housing-renters-pay-price-in-roaches-mold-leaks/

[nchyinotes]

AdWeek 2018 - GDPR Sessions

March 22 2018

GDPR Threat Versus Global Privacy Reality

Speakers:

Catherine Armitage: Senior Public Affairs Manager, World Federation of Advertisers

Dan Burdett: Head of EMEA Marketing Lab, eBay

William Long: Partner, Sidley Austin

Angelika Westphal: GDPR Marketing Lead Europe, Mondelez International

Notes:

eBay: we need to do a lot of organisation for management of data, because we are a business that really runs on data

AI powers a lot of decision making - ie. patterns between buyer/seller data for best search results/items to come up

a lot of data we have has been v unstructured - so now a big effort to create a taxonomy, structure it so we can compare

moving from listing base search results to a product graph —> seamless search, you just get the product you want + similar or accessories

Have been preparing for GDPR since 2016, auditing all departments around the world, use cases on all gaps (privacy teams), gap analysis. Since may 2017 have been working to close all the gaps to make sure its compliant.  

We have binding corporate rules in place since 2012 - minimise risk faced by GDPR

binding corporate rules: way company can get their practices approved by regulators. data can be transferred from europe etc

GDPR is a forcing function basically

you’ve got to be doing right by your customers

impact on consumers and trust - less financially tangible impact, reputation of brand & business > fines

mondelez:

more classical FMCG company, data has always been at the heart because all campaigns are rooted in it + actionable insights

what type of data points do we have, how do we capture them? a lot of it is sitting in different departments/silos (like ebay)

GDPR is not just an administrative burden, but an opportunity to build more trust - important as marketing function

also started preparing in 2016, cross functional project team started in 2017, currently closing off all efforts (mapping, reviewing systems)

Data is a valuable asset in communicating to consumers in a meaningful way

william

fines are a huge driver

Will mean a much greater discussion between groups/departments in company, any campaigns involving big data will involve legal team ? much more emphasis in beginning of process, rather than at the end (privacy by design)

e-privacy regulation - not really talked about in general media, directly aimed at electronic comms

belgium - still sorting out what the regulator will look like with its new powers

top 3 concerns among marketing firms, in a survey: trust, brand reputation, consumers trust with brand —> all about trust

mechanisms, standards, industry codes

no benchmarking about how GDPR will pan out once it’s live - year after they go live is v important for everyone

examples of campaigns using insights from aggregated data sets to inform creative, in last 12 months:

campaign in australia by snickers

found that certain mood types (anger, annoyance) lead to certain snacks behaviours

used twitter to scrape emotional sentiment of australia for 3 months

reduced price of snickers when the sentiment monitored was predominantly was angry

campaign by links (??): is it okay for …

about masculinity today

aggregated search data from google, on topics that were front of mind for guys today. -- used common searches by guys that start with “is it okay for…”

spotify took commonly created playlists to create engaging outdoor campaigns - it’s the end of the world as we know it song (brexit?? we’re still here for you)

Possibility of moving away from really personalised approach using personal data, and using aggregated/pseudonymous data?

trying to look for other types of data sets that are more anonymous?

how should this function be split between marketing and legal?

Both ebay and mondelez have privacy champions from every function, who are the first line of defence - all are trained by privacy team in easy non technical questions

important for all depts to own the solution

But all have a privacy team that work on the issue predominantly

will definitely change brand/industry etc, but not sure if GDPR itself will genuinely change consumers behaviour.

but news may have higher impact, facebook in the press - will that affect people’s decisions in opting in, does the drop off rate look significant?

there should be enough of a movement that requests will come of GDPR

giving people their rights - right of erasure, portability. will we be exercising them? who knows

legitimate interest

in e privacy - you cannot use it for new cookie law.  

not really about “can we being doing this with the info”, but should we.

about customer trust. - ethical questions being asked over time, not as much about lawyers to answer, but business.

eBay: a lot of unsupervised algorithms send out the emails ??

does future DPA have to be trained in data ethics as well, and not just the law?

What does GDPR mean for your business?

Speakers:

Somer Simpson: Lead Product Manager, Quantcast

Struan Bartlett: Founder & CEO, NewsNow.co.uk

Notes:

quantcast has been working with IAB to work on the framework for 3 months - publishers, advertisers, tech, mar/adtech companies came to a consensus

gdpr overview

universal truths:

1) consumers have a right to privacy - we’re all consumers, we don’t want our privacy to be abused

2) a free press is not free - in order for consumers to continue to have access they want/need to news/info, publishers need to have a way to pay for that (ie. digital advertising)

—> Need to balance: 1) consumers privacy rights & access to content, with 2) publisher ability to create & monetise content

—> business as usual is not an option (the wild west)

background

1) strengthens data protection for individuals

2) regulates the processing of personal data (including online identifiers) by companies

3) harmonizes data protection regulation in the EU

4) EU regulation with global impact (so any company with traffic from the EU)

themes

1) privacy by design - put privacy first in the way you develop all mechanisms

2) transparency about data practices - consumers need to know who is tracking them and for what purpose

3) choice and control over personal data

transparency, choice and control

GDPR expands the definition and regulates the processing of personal data

consent is one of 6 legal grounds for processing personal data (not always needed)

current privacy directive (cookie directive requires consent to set a cookie, access or store info on device - most cookie based data collection for advertising will require GDPR consent)

GDPR changes the consent standard under the ePrivacy directive

what is consent?

freely given, specific, informed, unambiguous indication of agreement by statement or by a clear affirmative action

robust info disclosure requirements - identifying data controllers and purposes

companies must be able to demonstrate consent through a record

easily revocable by consumer - clear, persistent ability to access and change their stuff

publishers

in the way it’s written, publishers are controllers

more responsibility

transparency for you and your users

opportunity from choice - to understand who your partners have relationships with, who they have relationships with, etc.

opp to understand who all is playing in the area and how that might impact revenue.

balancing revenue needs with transparency, control and understanding of who’s playing in your playground and how to control that

potential revenue impact

advertisers

transparency + consent for your websites and apps

retargeting, behavioural targeting - needs consent for cookies and pixels on your own site that allow that to happen

transparency + consent for your campaigns

3rd party providers hired for additional campaign info

have direct convos with publishers, this is who i work with, this is important to me, build up that list

adtech

we are why we are here

step up to do what’s right for the whole ecosystem

consumer rights

partner with publishers

revenue implications

we all make money off services we provide for advertisers/publishers

should i stay or should i go?

opportunity to clean up and build trust

industry transparency & consent framework

common industry standards: fragmentation will lead to inefficient and poor consumer experiences

effective efficient, neutral industry governance

simple policies around use of the new technical standards to ensure mutual trust and reassurance

core elements (of quantcast choice)

industry wide standard where digital content and ecosystems work together

open source, non commercial - for good of industry and consumer

publisher centric tool, giving transparency, control and flexibility to publishers

pro consumer tool, providing transparency, choice and control

quantcast choice

3rd party management - options for managing list of companies that can track consumers through a publisher’s site

customisable UX

easy implementation

free

important for quantcast/industry to get a solution out there with lots of adoption, so that business is disrupted as little as possible (taking weight off publishers, continuing to connect advertisers with consumers)

q&a

online behavioural advertising probably under a lot of pressure

“potentially an ass covering activity"

minefield of vagueness and uncertainty

nobody is really ready for this (DPAs), some legal advisors saying it’s not possible to comply totally?

PR advantage - credibility, trust, buy in from users

top 3 concerns from publishers

1) cost of everything - appointing DPA, legal counsel, advice fees

2) potential reputational damage for breaches (that may not be their fault - upstream parties that you don’t know, we have no idea who’s running what code. when people misbehave in that ecosystem, publishers are the one that takes the hit.)

3) not being ready in time + having systems in place (ie. basis on which you are processing some personal data - you decide it’s consent based, and later on want to switch to legit interest?? v tricky if impossible to do)

programmatic advertising - so many unknowns, we are only as ready as the industry partners we’re working with. we need ssp's, analytics suppliers to be ready.

working out what we need to rely on to get legitimate consent, how to best secure consent

where can we do without personal data altogether?

not just a UX thing, but a industry problem on how they’re actually using this data

bundling consent under very broad headings - agree on a common set of purposes where they are considered compliant, but not too many ??

Questioning partnerships: do we really want these people to be mentioned/shown on our website? is that good for our brand?

we don’t even know how much of our revenue currently depends on personal data - to quantify risk

[lawyersdatascraping]

Oklahoma Bar Association Lawyer Data Extraction

Oklahoma Bar Association Lawyer Data Extraction

Maximizing Legal Connections: Oklahoma Bar Association Lawyer Data Extraction by LawyersDataLab.com. In the competitive legal industry, access to accurate and comprehensive data is essential for law firms, legal service providers, and businesses seeking legal expertise. For those looking to connect with attorneys in Oklahoma, the Oklahoma Bar Association Lawyer Data Extraction service by LawyersDataLab.com offers a powerful solution. By extracting detailed information about Oklahoma-based lawyers, you can enhance your networking efforts, streamline outreach, and optimize your legal strategies. Let’s explore how this service can benefit your organization.

Data Fields:

Our Oklahoma Bar Association Lawyer Data Extraction service covers a wide array of data fields to ensure you have all the information you need:

Attorney Name: Full names of the attorneys.

Law Firm: Names and details of the law firms they are associated with.

Practice Areas: Specific areas of law they specialize in (e.g., family law, criminal defense, corporate law).

Contact Information: Email addresses, phone numbers, and office addresses.

Bar Admission Date: Information on when the attorney was admitted to the Oklahoma Bar.

Professional Experience: Years of practice and notable cases or positions held.

Benefits:

1. Targeted Outreach: With detailed data at your disposal, you can craft targeted outreach campaigns tailored to specific legal needs or practice areas. This ensures higher engagement and more meaningful connections.

2. Enhanced Networking: Access to comprehensive contact information allows you to build a robust network of legal professionals in Oklahoma, facilitating collaborations, referrals, and partnerships.

3. Market Insights: Understanding the distribution of practice areas and expertise within the Oklahoma legal community can help you identify trends, gaps, and opportunities for your services.

4. Efficiency and Accuracy: Automated data extraction ensures accuracy and saves time compared to manual data collection, allowing you to focus on strategic decision-making and relationship building.

5. Compliance and Updates: Regular updates and compliance with data protection regulations ensure that the data you receive is current, accurate, and legally compliant, minimizing risks associated with outdated or incorrect information.

State Bar Directory Data Scraping

Ohio State Bar Lawyers Mailing List

RIBar Lawyers Email Database

Texas Bar Association Attorneys Email List

Extract Lawyers Data from Kybar

Oregon State Bar Attorney Mailing List

Azbar.org Attorney Data Scraping

Nebraska State Bar Attorneys Email Database

Alabama State Bar Attorneys Email Database

Wyoming Bar Association Lawyer Data Scraping

Conclusion:

In conclusion, LawyersDataLab.com's Oklahoma Bar Association Lawyer Data Extraction service is a valuable resource for anyone looking to enhance their legal connections and strategies in Oklahoma. Whether you are a law firm aiming to expand your network, a business seeking legal expertise, or a legal service provider targeting specific practice areas, our comprehensive data extraction service provides you with the insights and contacts you need. By leveraging accurate and detailed lawyer data, you can optimize your outreach efforts, foster meaningful connections, and drive growth in the competitive legal landscape. Contact LawyersDataLab.com today to learn more about how our tailored data solutions can benefit your organization and help you achieve your legal networking goals.

Website: Lawyersdatalab.com 

Email: info@lawyersdatalab.com

[datascraping001]

Top Data Scraping Services Provider in Los Angeles

Top Data Scraping Services Provider in Los Angeles

Top Data Scraping Services Provider in Los Angeles by DataScrapingServices.com. 

In today’s data-driven world, businesses in Los Angeles are constantly seeking innovative ways to gain a competitive edge. Whether you’re a startup, a growing enterprise, or a multinational corporation, leveraging our top-tier data scraping services can unlock new opportunities and enhance decision-making. 

DataScrapingServices.com is proud to be aTop Data Scraping Services Provider In Los Angeles for businesses in Los Angeles. We specialize in extracting valuable information from online sources, empowering companies with accurate and actionable data. From eCommerce pricing and product details to real estate listings, contact directories, and industry-specific insights, our solutions are tailored to meet diverse needs. Our services enable Los Angeles businesses to optimize marketing strategies, enhance lead generation, and make informed decisions, saving time and resources. With a commitment to accuracy, compliance, and reliability, we are the trusted partner for organizations seeking a competitive edge in today’s data-driven world.

Comprehensive Data Scraping Solutions 

DataScrapingServices.com specializes in extracting valuable information from various online sources, enabling businesses to stay ahead in their respective industries. Our Los Angeles-based clients benefit from our expertise in multiple sectors, including eCommerce, real estate, healthcare, legal services, and more. 

Key Data Fields We Extract 

Our tailored services include extracting essential data fields such as: 

- Product details and pricing information 

- Contact information

- Business reviews and ratings 

- Property listings

- Event and ticketing details 

- Industry-specific directories and databases 

Benefits of Choosing DataScrapingServices.com 

1. Enhanced Marketing Strategies: Access to well-organized and accurate data allows businesses to create highly targeted marketing campaigns. 

2. Competitive Pricing Analysis: Understand market trends and optimize pricing strategies to maximize profitability. 

3. Lead Generation Made Easy: Extract contact information from directories to expand your client base efficiently. 

4. Time and Cost Efficiency: Automate data extraction to save valuable resources and focus on core business functions. 

5. Custom Solutions: Our flexible approach ensures that the data scraping solutions we offer meet the unique needs of your business. 

Why Los Angeles Businesses Choose Us? 

As a trusted partner, we prioritize accuracy, compliance, and data integrity. Our cutting-edge technology and experienced team deliver high-quality results with quick turnaround times. We ensure adherence to ethical practices and data protection laws, making us a reliable choice for businesses in Los Angeles. 

Popular Data Scraping Services:

Restaurant Data Scraping

Social Media Data Scraping

Real Estate Data Scraping

Automobile Data Scraping

Classified Websites Scraping

Event Website Scraping

Job Portal Data Scraping

News & Media Data Scraping

Deals/Coupon Code Scraping  

Vacation Rental Scraping Services

Ecommerce Product Details Scraping Services

Business Directory Scraping

Lawyers Data Scraping

Conclusion 

Data scraping is no longer a luxury but a necessity for businesses striving to remain competitive. By partnering with DataScrapingServices.com, Los Angeles-based organizations can harness the power of data to drive growth and innovation. From market insights to lead generation, our services are designed to provide unparalleled value. 

📩 Contact us today at info@datascrapingservices.com to learn how our data scraping solutions can elevate your business in Los Angeles!