#pscore

[masonsleclerc]

FUCK OFF DOD MASON PSCORE ABOGINT SOURHATOMON D

[kunaludapi]

Again I received some good feedback from community, This article is just a next update to my existing script PowerShell: Copy group membership from one user to another user in Active Directory, whose purpose is adding groups on member of tab on destination users and not removing anything. Which was helpful in scenarios where user require additional access by copying source user group and retaining existing group membership, But it might not be helpful for new user or when user is moved to another department and they need new access to groups removing old groups from member of tab, They might also need to move to template source user's OU (Organization Unit). This given script fulfills all these requirements.

[zainmirza032]

NGO accuses North Korea of institutionalised child sex abuse

North Korean children are "constantly in danger" of sexual abuse and resulting social stigma without any chance to seek legal protection, a Seoul-based rights group said on Wednesday. Activists with PSCORE, or People for Successful Corean Reunification, interviewed more than 200 young male and female North Koreans who had fled to settle in the affluent, democratic South for a study on child abuse at home, at school and in state facilities such as prison camps and orphanages. In a 195-page report, "Inescapable Violence: Child Abuse within North Korea", the group described sexual abuse as "institutionalised and widely accepted as a normal part of life".

from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/33pNjmS

from Blogger https://ift.tt/2DlCt6D

[noshiposts]

NGO accuses North Korea of institutionalised child sex abuse

North Korean children are "constantly in danger" of sexual abuse and resulting social stigma without any chance to seek legal protection, a Seoul-based rights group said on Wednesday. Activists with PSCORE, or People for Successful Corean Reunification, interviewed more than 200 young male and female North Koreans who had fled to settle in the affluent, democratic South for a study on child abuse at home, at school and in state facilities such as prison camps and orphanages. In a 195-page report, "Inescapable Violence: Child Abuse within North Korea", the group described sexual abuse as "institutionalised and widely accepted as a normal part of life".

from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/33pNjmS

from Blogger https://ift.tt/34rL1oJ

[theextraspoon]

Google's up to something. We know it. We filed with the FTC against them and Facebook for unfair advertising and had audits subpoenaed, we've had billboards posted in times square posted by hempislegal.org. We've been working on an aggregator to skip big tech, opening advertising to our industry and ad revenue to demonetized creators and rising streamers and if there's anything we know, it's the big tech fight and how little their bias surprises us anymore.

However both businesses and creators keep getting blocked by "the man," who's actually a middle aged leftist woman named Susan, we've come to find out. While she's at Youtube, a Google company, it hemorrhages money and users, yet still having $25 million for Vox, the company that lead to one of the bigger advertiser bailouts (adpocolypse) to date. Google has gone from anything goes blocking it's services such as Social Blade or audit bots, manipulating algorithms to favor certain creators, blocking small businesses from advertising, prohibiting hemp lest you risk losing your channel, pandering to the lgbt community while also banning all lgbt creators from earning an income... the list goes on and on.

Many people have tried to come forward for a while about Google, but were written off as conspiracy theorists. Now, it would seem, creators and youtubers have begun to see the patterns are the ones exposing youtube and in a really big way.

It was late night show, Afterhours with AugieRFC ft Bowblax where we had first heard of Youtube's newest scandal. #Checkyourpscore went viral shortly before on twitter and coincidentally the original name of the episode in which we first heard about this issue. Afterhours, a livestream podcast regarding online news and banter, exposed the pscores Youtube had attempted to hide from creators. The news was kept quiet for 24 hours before they went public, however Youtube had the P-Scores hidden and patched by the time the show had ended. It took 2 hours.

Normally this isn't something of concern and some might argue that there's a possibly Youtube is just on top of it's game. We assure you it's not. Youtube has written an article patting itself on the back for ATTEMPTING customer service, something we all do for our businesses daily. We also wish to bring your attention back to TOONE, the creator whose account was hacked (another occurrence becoming more common at Youtube) causing the creator to lose his only source of income for the past 8 years. It two WEEKS for Youtube to respond. He had big name creators making videos and tweeting the company, however the company is notorious for having you DM them then muting you and never responding again. This is something Sinatra Says, creator and friend to our site and Afterhours, knows all too well. He's been tweeting youtube and emailing them every day for 2 months. They've taken his income as well, in the form of a full demonetization on his channel without explanation and not a single response.

This in mind, Youtube's jumping to silently fix the leaked pscore concern within 2 hours showed they had something to hide. Google has come under fire for politically swaying their search results on Google search as well as Youtube. This was mentioned on Afterhours as well as asking, What's your P-score?

P-scores, Bowblax explains, is the algorithm Youtube uses for videos to organize them into categories for advertisers. This was accompanied by a thorough document entitled YouTube’s P-Scores, Video Throttling, and More: A Comprehensive Guide By: Bowblax, Nicholars DeOrio, Optimus, Pescatore

We urge not only creators but those whom work with us for advertising to read it as we could never do as thorough a job as these four creators have, but we wanted to pick out some key parts we think needs a closer look.

P-Scores refer to an internal rating given by Google to channels to rate them based on five metrics according to a video that they released on April 10th, 2019. These metrics are all combined to, “surface among the most popular channels on YouTube.”

The five metrics are popularity, platform, passion, protection, production.

Popularity: Heavily driven by watch time. The more minutes that your videos are being watched, the better that this metric will influence your overall P-Score. Channels that put out longer videos will most likely have better ‘popularity rankings’ than channels that put out extremely short videos.

Passion: Leans more on engagement with an audience, so channels that have more devoted fanbases who engage content more with likes, comments, and in other methods likely will have better rankings in ‘passion.’

Protection: Based on how suitable content is for advertisers. Family friendly channels obviously will do great. Edgy content will not.

Platform: Beneficial to content that is frequently watched on larger screens, primarily TV screens. Seems to target growing audiences.

Production: Focuses on content that uses high-quality editing, camera footage, and more. The better the production value, most likely, the better the score.

Ideally, if you make the following type of content:

10+ minute videos with 45%+ viewer retention per video

A highly driven fanbase that shares your content, likes your videos more than the average creator, and comments opinions a lot

Is family friendly, little to no swearing, no sexual content, no violence, etc.

Content that can be watched on all devices, platforms and in all markets with ease

Content that focuses on high production values and good quality

This would make your P-Score higher than the average user.

Curious.

P-Scores appear to be more than just these five benchmarks being compared against your metrics, they appear to be more like overall scores of an account in general. When you look at a P-Score, it doesn’t give you insight on any strong suits for these five things. It only gives you the one unified number, which is your overall grade. The issue, however, is that creators have no way of determining or identifying the individual values for each of these benchmarks.

Creators who are doing great with popularity, platform and passion might never have the opportunity to fix their protection scores because they’d never know it’s an issue, for example. You can mix and match between these five to make problems for channels, but they could never fully reach their potential if they can’t identify an issue. Google knows that these are issues but does not alert creators or give them an opportunity to access this data without finding some sort of weird exploit to get to it.

Another major note for P-Scores is that they appear to be region-based. While obtaining scores for creators from the United States, we noticed that we were getting different scores for these same exact creators from Bowblax, a Canadian creator. He estimated that the average Canadian P-Score value for creators was ‘about 20 points less.’ To test our theory, we used a VPN from the United States to appear as a Canadian user, and we matched the numbers perfectly. P-Scores do appear to be region-based.

The document then goes in detail on how to locate a specific channels P-score, now invalid as it's been patched. They do however explain the guide to ratings that reminds us a lot of television, something we all know Youtube is attempting to become with their influx of comedy show clip channels hitting trending every day. They describe these ratings as Y, G, PG, Teen, Mature, and X. They explain these ratings in detail in the guide as well.

The team then brings to your attention throttling and what youtube has said and done to hide it from you. The team has an entire section on throttling code found as well. To throttle a function means to ensure that the function is called at most once in a specified time period (for instance, once every 10 seconds). This means throttling will prevent a function from running if it has run “recently”. Throttling also ensures a function is run regularly at a fixed rate.(bit.dev)

The team concludes; "At this point, we’re completely in the dark like usual with how YouTube has developed all of this and implemented this, and also on how they’ll react. We know that this information alone is extremely valuable to the YouTube community, and so figuring this out has been a potential revelation that can benefit creators for a long time to come.

YouTube will potentially fix these exploits to get your P-Score/other peoples’ P-Score very soon, possibly within hours or days. It’s best that you get your information now if you can in case there is no other way to get it. At this point, we’re unsure what this means specifically for the future. We just want this to help everyone else."

They were right. We were intrigued by the dedication these users put forth just to be patched two hours later. Still, the guide does hold some information within it that validates things we've said in the past as well as may help you as a creator or small business advertiser in the future. We highly suggest you read the full guide here.

For more details on their findings, they've included a spreadsheet of 200 channels they looked at while investigating P-scores including friends of ours or friends of Blunt Media such as Steven Crowder, Cognificent Thought, WillyMacShow, Lord Vega, Pewds, Markiplier, Jacksepticeye, to Kavos, Vox, Drama Alert, TV Network channels and even Susan herself. You can view the collected data in a spreadsheet here.

We urge everyone to read this and see it as the tip of the iceberg when it comes to problems we face and are trying to expose and change in the future of big tech control over the internet, social media, free speech, and fair business and advertising. As you witnessed from The Blacklist, we can't do it alone. We could pull out all the secrets of Google to expose them but without you sharing the information, no one will know of it. We walk the line, while we're writing an article we're not journalists. While we run a business, were not the big corrupt business behind the corruption of America keeping this industry back (but not down!) We're activists for marijuana legality and law reform, but we're not social justice warriors. We work with the disabled but only help those who are willing to help themselves. We create but we're not creators, advertise but aren't THOSE advertisers, we're in chat but not just viewers and we sponsor people but won't allow Youtube their cut because we feel they don't keep up their end to deserve it. We don't pay for no security or guarantee and no matter how much more they mess up the platform it won't bring back the hordes of advertisers that left the second they threw Pewdiepie under the bus. They'll blame advertisers which causes creators to shit on advertisers which leads to less advertisers wanting to pay the ungrateful youtubers and streamers who most brand dealers actively are attempting to make family friendly... but no one really cares about that. The advertisers aren't leaving because you curse, or because you're gay. They left because the company threw you under the bus, then blamed advertisers. They didn't stand by anyone. Their foundation is weak and many creators ate it up, shitting on the few people left to be able to sign a paycheck when youtube demonetized them. This is another way Youtube let down the very thing that runs it's service, video creators and their content.If they are willing to throw the very thing that makes them under the bus who's to say they won't throw a specific advertiser under the bus next time the going gets tough or the mute button breaks?

Your enemy is not the advertisers, but they do watch. CEO's are people like you, often attempting to fill the void of silence with some form of human connection and thus turning towards playing podcasts and streams in the background to keep themselves tuned in. Often times sponsorships are granted by a company asking for a channel by name that they watch themselves.They don't care that you're edgy like late night, they don't care that you play ads, they don't care about any of that. In fact, in the beginning youtube would let you pick out keywords and channels to NOT advertise with. What happened to that simple system?

Now imagine you working your butt off in an effort to build something to help creators out of your own time, money and free will only to overhear creators wrongfully judging, attacking, and shitting on them. It won't bring them back for Youtube ads and it won't bring them back to sponsor your channel privately. On that note, ads are often chosen via automatic aggregation, and private sponsorships requiring adreads and commercial fare have begun to work together on aggregating their ads without Youtube and Google, through brand dealers like our BluntBrands and Famebit. They have their own rating system and ability to warn other businesses from a creator with bad practices; such as theft, slander, bad behavior, breaking contracts etc. Together with Youtube's new P-score, if your listed as hard to work with on a popular aggregator where businesses come to talk about changing the way we advertise online, you could have all the influence in the world and be completely un-marketable.

Many managers in the livestream communities have taken this as a call for censorship and family friendly content completely unaware that it will do nothing for them due to the actions and behaviors displayed by that channel. Knowing the type of social scoring Google seems to be going for on youtube, this seems like it will soon jump into the finances of more than just youtubers and content creators, but the privacy of all of it's users while it attempts to monopolize the internet, Google known to often steal script from smaller app developers that cannot afford to sue them. This puts an emphasis on BBB, who holds Facebook and Google in high regard DESPITE THEIR HORRIBLE CUSTOMER SERVICE SCORE and endless reports of them simply refusing to contact and ignoring correspondence. This is the biggest example of unfair business practice on the net. Money, threats, and size get you a better business score, even if your business is terrible. Business Yellow Pages app Yelp got in trouble for doing similar a few years back, however being a dedicated contact and advertising platform, they are subject to FTC limitations the BBB is not, like antitrust and fair competition law. Oftentimes BBB is used as an effort to threaten businesses during this age of cancel culture and I'm here to tell you, BBB has no control over anything. You go, you complain, you feel better, our junk email collects the report we'll never respond to. This is common and probably easier for the BBB which is why they don't send letters, make calls, even contact business emails rather than report emails. The goal isn't really to fix your concern. It's to be a standard that no one checks anymore.

Good news is, millennials are coming to professional positions in an effort to change. They're journalists, creators, small businesses and some becoming big businesses. They're learning what we've learned a while back and why most of our clients hire us in the first place. The power of the internet is truly in it's users. Your influence is due to your user engagement. Livestreams would not be entertaining without it's chat, it's users. Your fans, your end user, should be how your scored on Youtube. It was. It worked. Your channel would grow and become promoted or trending based on the website's end users. They'd watch, subscribe, like or dislike your videos which would bring those with positive interaction to the top and worse to the bottom per day, per video and it worked. Now you have a P-score.

Creator Bowblax went into detail on his video "What Youtube is Hiding From You"

The internet will find it if it exists and this can be both a good and bad thing, however we understand this power and would rather be on the site of the internet users, the people. You can confuse and gaslight but you cannot tell them what to think. They find truth and they share it. They judge openly. They will tell you if you ask. This is why we don't "cancel" sponsorships to creators due to witch hunts but listen to the complaints and only end contracts if the user is posing harm to their or our community. This is why we urge interaction between businesses and why we partner with so many of them willing to work together for fair ads to help the creators we grew up watching and we know and love. So next time you get that offer for a small business working with your channel, see if you can work together on a deal for advertising for tomorrow they could own one of the biggest businesses or aggregators in the world and it would be amazing if we all could grow together, bigger than the biggest tech.

However, crawlers and aggregators use code to find video and Google is aware of this, often times intentionally scripting or patching code to intentionally prevent devs and aggregation to its content creators. Even though youtube won't pay them, you can't either. Google has blocked us on multiple occasions which is why we had our data pulled for a 3rd party audit, why we're botting in your chats, and why BOT7 from the sbai app... a Youtube account with regular watch hours (its to imitate a moderate to active user) with no video uploads was banned for breaking upload terms of service. Youtube has muted us over a year ago, they refuse to respond to email as well and we aren't given the option to appeal. This is one of 8 audit bots proving Google is manipulating this P-score for planted creators and favorites, like Juicewrld, whom published a video earlier this year of YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki allegedly promising him Artificial Growth covered below by our friend Memology101.

Without this video many may not have even begun to look into the artificial growth and manipulation Google is capable of and actively using, like the manual review process that we've come to find demonetizes all videos during prime views we suspect to not have to pay creators for the first few hours when they make the most on their videos. Under review, you won't get monetized until the views begin to slow down. Something we're also looking into but think should be known.

It's 2019 and big name tech has proven they cannot handle the great responsibility Google has taken upon itself.The same goes for those who witch hunt with some sense of power, businesses who want to control all the money flow, and pharma companies who put the lives and health of their customers second to their income. These, the main enemy in the battle of internet freedom and if you like your freedom of speech and don't believe in wrong think, MUST be exposed to the rest of the creators and the internet if we have any hope of stopping it for the future. We could lose it all to censorship without creators like these that go above and beyond to expose the truths on the internet.

Please show your support by giving these creators an organic follow on twitter:

@SubToOptimus

@Bowblax

@JoshPescatore

@Nicholas_DeOrio

via Natural Healthy: Latest News

[myeclecticcollectorblazeus]

North Korean children are "constantly in danger" of sexual abuse and resulting social stigma without any chance to seek legal protection, a Seoul-based rights group said on Wednesday. Activists with PSCORE, or People for Successful Corean Reunification, interviewed more than 200 young male and female North Koreans who had fled to settle in the affluent, democratic South for a study on child abuse at home, at school and in state facilities such as prison camps and orphanages. In a 195-page report, "Inescapable Violence: Child Abuse within North Korea", the group described sexual abuse as "institutionalised and widely accepted as a normal part of life".

from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/33pNjmS

[supertrendingnewsarticles]

North Korean children are "constantly in danger" of sexual abuse and resulting social stigma without any chance to seek legal protection, a Seoul-based rights group said on Wednesday. Activists with PSCORE, or People for Successful Corean Reunification, interviewed more than 200 young male and female North Koreans who had fled to settle in the affluent, democratic South for a study on child abuse at home, at school and in state facilities such as prison camps and orphanages. In a 195-page report, "Inescapable Violence: Child Abuse within North Korea", the group described sexual abuse as "institutionalised and widely accepted as a normal part of life".

from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/33pNjmS

[teeky185]

North Korean children are "constantly in danger" of sexual abuse and resulting social stigma without any chance to seek legal protection, a Seoul-based rights group said on Wednesday. Activists with PSCORE, or People for Successful Corean Reunification, interviewed more than 200 young male and female North Koreans who had fled to settle in the affluent, democratic South for a study on child abuse at home, at school and in state facilities such as prison camps and orphanages. In a 195-page report, "Inescapable Violence: Child Abuse within North Korea", the group described sexual abuse as "institutionalised and widely accepted as a normal part of life".

from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/33pNjmS

[7newx1]

North Korean children are "constantly in danger" of sexual abuse and resulting social stigma without any chance to seek legal protection, a Seoul-based rights group said on Wednesday. Activists with PSCORE, or People for Successful Corean Reunification, interviewed more than 200 young male and female North Koreans who had fled to settle in the affluent, democratic South for a study on child abuse at home, at school and in state facilities such as prison camps and orphanages. In a 195-page report, "Inescapable Violence: Child Abuse within North Korea", the group described sexual abuse as "institutionalised and widely accepted as a normal part of life".

[sweatygardencollectorblr]

North Korean children are "constantly in danger" of sexual abuse and resulting social stigma without any chance to seek legal protection, a Seoul-based rights group said on Wednesday. Activists with PSCORE, or People for Successful Corean Reunification, interviewed more than 200 young male and female North Koreans who had fled to settle in the affluent, democratic South for a study on child abuse at home, at school and in state facilities such as prison camps and orphanages. In a 195-page report, "Inescapable Violence: Child Abuse within North Korea", the group described sexual abuse as "institutionalised and widely accepted as a normal part of life".

from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/33pNjmS

[tendance-news]

North Korean children are "constantly in danger" of sexual abuse and resulting social stigma without any chance to seek legal protection, a Seoul-based rights group said on Wednesday. Activists with PSCORE, or People for Successful Corean Reunification, interviewed more than 200 young male and female North Koreans who had fled to settle in the affluent, democratic South for a study on child abuse at home, at school and in state facilities such as prison camps and orphanages. In a 195-page report, "Inescapable Violence: Child Abuse within North Korea", the group described sexual abuse as "institutionalised and widely accepted as a normal part of life".

from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/33pNjmS

[justsimplylovely]

North Korean children are "constantly in danger" of sexual abuse and resulting social stigma without any chance to seek legal protection, a Seoul-based rights group said on Wednesday. Activists with PSCORE, or People for Successful Corean Reunification, interviewed more than 200 young male and female North Koreans who had fled to settle in the affluent, democratic South for a study on child abuse at home, at school and in state facilities such as prison camps and orphanages. In a 195-page report, "Inescapable Violence: Child Abuse within North Korea", the group described sexual abuse as "institutionalised and widely accepted as a normal part of life".

from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/33pNjmS

[stefanstranger]

Favorite tweets

Having @thorstenbutz perfect #PSconfEU picture as background in the new #WindowsTerminal app for the #PSCore tab. I already like this new way of console :) (please make it available outside the store also @cinnamon_msft and team, thinking of mobile/server usage, thx) #PowerShell pic.twitter.com/epxZLfW6Qf

— Christian Lehrer (@chri_tea) June 22, 2019

from http://twitter.com/chri_tea via IFTTT

[mastmaal]

DM&V: Week 3 Assignment

My Program

""" Created on Sat May 26 10:31:47 2018

@author: Dinesh """

import pandas as pd import numpy as np import matplotlib.pyplot as pltdata = pd.read_csv('gapminder.csv', low_memory=False, index_col=None)

print (data.shape)

data2 = data [['country','polityscore','femaleemployrate','employrate','lifeexpectancy','incomeperperson']]

data2.replace(' ', np.nan, inplace=True)

data2 = data2.dropna()

femaleemployrate = data2 [['polityscore','femaleemployrate']] femaleemployrate = femaleemployrate.astype(float)

employrate = data2 [['polityscore','employrate']] employrate = employrate.astype(float)

lifeexpectancy = data2 [['polityscore','lifeexpectancy']] lifeexpectancy = lifeexpectancy.astype(float)

incomeperperson = data2 [['polityscore','incomeperperson']] incomeperperson = incomeperperson.astype(float)

f1 = femaleemployrate.groupby(['polityscore']).agg(['count','mean','min','median','max']) e1 = employrate.groupby(['polityscore']).agg(['count','mean','min','median','max']) l1 = lifeexpectancy.groupby(['polityscore']).agg(['count','mean','min','median','max']) i1 = incomeperperson.groupby(['polityscore']).agg(['count','mean','min','median','max'])

#print(f1.shape) #f1.columns = [ 'count', 'mean', 'min', 'median', 'max'] #f1 = f1.rename (index= {0: 'pscore'}) print (f1) print (e1) print (l1) print (i1)

Table 1: f1

           femaleemployrate                                                                   count       mean        min     median        max polityscore                                                             -10.0                      2  28.650000  17.700001  28.650000  39.599998 -9.0                       3  51.199999  47.099998  52.599998  53.900002 -8.0                       2  29.950000  22.600000  29.950000  37.299999 -7.0                      11  46.527273  16.700001  48.599998  78.099998 -6.0                       2  40.200001  22.200001  40.200001  58.200001 -5.0                       2  52.649998  39.599998  52.649998  65.699997 -4.0                       6  39.300000  21.400000  42.600000  52.299999 -3.0                       6  40.933333  13.000000  41.900000  80.500000 -2.0                       5  50.520000  20.299999  51.299999  69.400002 -1.0                       4  74.150000  62.900002  76.849998  80.000000 0.0                       4  51.375000  12.400000  56.950001  79.199997 1.0                       3  59.966666  48.799999  58.099998  73.000000 2.0                       2  52.550001  31.700001  52.550001  73.400002 3.0                       2  46.250000  39.900002  46.250000  52.599998 4.0                       4  56.050000  36.500000  59.400000  68.900002 5.0                       7 ��45.757143  19.000000  45.500000  82.199997 6.0                      10  51.990000  37.299999  49.200001  83.300003 7.0                      13  48.615385  21.900000  54.700001  66.599998 8.0                      18  47.766666  38.700001  46.350000  65.300003 9.0                      14  43.178571  26.799999  42.750000  59.799999 10.0                     32  48.868750  35.500000  50.100000  60.900002

Analysis

Here I’ve grouped the countries by polityscore. The could column shows how many countries identify with that polityscore. The mean is the average of the countries belonging to that polityscore; I have also included the min value of the group, the median value of the group, and also the max value of the group. 

Interesting to note that for this variable, countries that are towards the center (polityscore in {-2,-1,0,1,2}) have the highest average female employment rate. I

Table 2: e1

           employrate                                                             count       mean        min     median        max polityscore                                                       -10.0                2  63.600000  51.200001  63.600000  76.000000 -9.0                 3  55.633334  50.900002  57.500000  58.500000 -8.0                 2  62.949999  50.700001  62.949999  75.199997 -7.0                11  59.890909  44.799999  60.400002  78.199997 -6.0                 2  54.950001  46.200001  54.950001  63.700001 -5.0                 2  66.699999  61.700001  66.699999  71.699997 -4.0                 6  55.416666  41.599998  57.750000  64.199997 -3.0                 6  56.000001  38.900002  57.250000  79.800003 -2.0                 5  58.580000  39.000000  62.400002  75.699997 -1.0                 4  78.549999  71.300003  79.849998  83.199997 0.0                 4  65.400002  37.400002  70.600002  83.000000 1.0                 3  68.800001  58.900002  66.800003  80.699997 2.0                 2  64.700001  50.500000  64.700001  78.900002 3.0                 2  58.700001  58.400002  58.700001  59.000000 4.0                 4  63.025001  50.900002  64.600000  72.000000 5.0                 7  59.714285  40.099998  59.700001  77.000000 6.0                10  62.080000  42.000000  61.150000  83.199997 7.0                13  60.100000  42.799999  63.200001  73.199997 8.0                18  58.166667  44.299999  58.300001  73.099998 9.0                14  53.392857  34.900002  53.400002  68.300003 10.0               32  56.909375  46.400002  57.400000  65.000000

Analysis

I am comparing the general population employment statistics in this table. I want to further compare this table with the table above. Similar to the table above, the highest employment rate averages are appearing towards the middle of the spectrum.

Table 3: l1

           lifeexpectancy                                                         count       mean     min   median     max polityscore                                                   -10.0                    2  76.141000  73.911  76.1410  78.371 -9.0                     3  60.663667  48.718  64.9860  68.287 -8.0                     2  74.760000  72.974  74.7600  76.546 -7.0                    11  72.419818  61.597  73.4560  79.143 -6.0                     2  69.583500  67.017  69.5835  72.150 -5.0                     2  54.789500  51.088  54.7895  58.491 -4.0                     6  61.877167  51.610  59.4155  74.515 -3.0                     6  66.447667  54.675  70.3820  74.402 -2.0                     5  61.169400  49.553  58.5820  81.126 -1.0                     4  53.702500  48.398  54.1065  58.199 0.0                     4  61.644000  55.377  61.0785  69.042 1.0                     3  59.457333  51.384  59.2740  67.714 2.0                     2  68.128000  63.125  68.1280  73.131 3.0                     2  64.944000  62.703  64.9440  67.185 4.0                     4  64.404750  51.879  65.8070  74.126 5.0                     7  63.569286  48.397  65.4370  75.632 6.0                    10  63.362500  48.132  65.6300  74.941 7.0                    13  62.448538  47.794  62.4750  73.979 8.0                    18  70.452778  48.196  72.3365  80.642 9.0                    14  72.050286  52.797  74.0170  81.539 10.0                   32  78.774219  68.498  79.9460  83.394

Analysis

Here I’m comparing the lifeexpectancy for the groupings. 

Table 4: i1

           incomeperperson                                            \                      count          mean           min        median   polityscore                                                             -10.0                     2  21678.578974   9425.325870  21678.578974   -9.0                      3   1608.394315    952.827261   1810.230533   -8.0                      2  16139.602566  11191.811007  16139.602566   -7.0                     11   3408.234151    131.796207   2344.896916   -6.0                      2   2163.034973   1844.351028   2163.034973   -5.0                      2   4504.568286    354.599726   4504.568286   -4.0                      6   1361.951664    285.224449    983.465659   -3.0                      6   1805.907603    180.083376   1156.909149   -2.0                      5   7082.441928    275.884287    610.357367   -1.0                      4    371.206755    239.518749    394.461280   0.0                      4    461.553486    242.677534    433.634179   1.0                      3    304.797184    220.891248    320.771890   2.0                      2   1394.970424    557.947513   1394.970424   3.0                      2   2752.480363   1324.194906   2752.480363   4.0                      4   1731.125111    544.599477   1728.378306   5.0                      7    735.191035    103.775857    558.062877   6.0                     10   1249.117100    115.305996    734.455762   7.0                     13   1672.164506    268.331790    561.708585   8.0                     18   5234.171457    358.979540   3303.301633   9.0                     14   4524.392700    336.368749   2908.609206   10.0                    32  19290.403182    772.933345  17222.013829  

                     max   polityscore                 -10.0        33931.832079   -9.0          2062.125152   -8.0         21087.394125   -7.0         12505.212545   -6.0          2481.718918   -5.0          8654.536845   -4.0          3164.927693   -3.0          5528.363114   -2.0         32535.832512   -1.0           456.385712   0.0           736.268054   1.0           372.728414   2.0          2231.993335   3.0          4180.765821   4.0          2923.144355   5.0          1728.020976   6.0          5184.709328   7.0          6746.612632   8.0         24496.048264   9.0         22878.466567   10.0        39972.352768   __main__:22: SettingWithCopyWarning:

Analysis

This is the final variable I have used here, the incomeperperson. Interestingly, the highest avg’s appear towards the extremes of the spectrum, similar to the table above.

[sweatygardencollectorblr]

North Korean children are "constantly in danger" of sexual abuse and resulting social stigma without any chance to seek legal protection, a Seoul-based rights group said on Wednesday. Activists with PSCORE, or People for Successful Corean Reunification, interviewed more than 200 young male and female North Koreans who had fled to settle in the affluent, democratic South for a study on child abuse at home, at school and in state facilities such as prison camps and orphanages. In a 195-page report, "Inescapable Violence: Child Abuse within North Korea", the group described sexual abuse as "institutionalised and widely accepted as a normal part of life".

from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/33pNjmS