#scope of data science

[mohitreal1995]

Future Scope of Data Science

Data science is the study of data to extract meaningful insights for businesses, utilizing tools like data visualization, machine learning, and statistical analysis. Data scientists clean and process data, analyze it for patterns, build models, and validate their accuracy. Essential skills include programming, statistics, machine learning, data visualization, problem-solving, and effective communication. The field's future scope is promising, with key areas like AI, IoT, personalization, healthcare, and cybersecurity benefiting from data science's data-driven approach. This growing demand makes data science a lucrative and essential career path, providing valuable skills and opportunities. Read in detail, Click on the link: https://kajaldigital.livepositively.com/future-scope-of-data-science/

[bigleapblog]

Scope of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science Engineering in India – Career Opportunities After Graduation

In today's fast-paced digital world, the convergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Data Science (DS) has revolutionized the way we interact with technology. From personalized product recommendations to self-driving cars, AI and DS are powering some of the most cutting-edge innovations of the 21st century.

In India, the demand for skilled professionals in AI and DS is skyrocketing, making it one of the most promising career paths for aspiring engineers. In this blog, we’ll dive into what AI and Data Science entail, their growing scope in India, and the career opportunities they present. We will also highlight how Saraswati College of Engineering (SCOE) is nurturing the next generation of AI & DS professionals.

What is Artificial Intelligence and Data Science?

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the simulation of human intelligence in machines, enabling them to perform tasks like learning, reasoning, problem-solving, and decision-making.

Data Science (DS), on the other hand, is a multidisciplinary field that uses scientific methods, algorithms, and systems to extract knowledge from structured and unstructured data.

Together, AI and DS empower machines to learn from vast datasets and make intelligent decisions. This integration drives innovations like virtual assistants, fraud detection systems, predictive analytics, and autonomous vehicles.

Scope of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science Engineering in India

India is rapidly embracing digital transformation across various sectors including healthcare, finance, education, agriculture, and manufacturing. This shift has massively increased the need for AI and DS professionals.

1. Growing Industry Demand

According to NASSCOM, India is expected to witness over 1 million job openings in AI and DS roles by 2030. Companies across industries are investing heavily in AI and big data analytics to gain a competitive edge.

2. Government Initiatives

The Indian government has launched forward-thinking initiatives like National AI Strategy and AI for All, aiming to promote AI education, research, and nationwide adoption.

3. Startup Ecosystem

India’s booming startup culture, especially in healthcare, fintech, edtech, and retail, is leveraging AI to build smarter, more efficient solutions.

4. Global Recognition

Indian professionals in AI and Data Science are gaining global recognition, with many being hired by leading tech giants such as Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta.

Career Opportunities After AI and DS Engineering

Graduates from AI and DS programs can pursue a wide range of exciting and impactful careers:

🔹 AI Engineer – Develops intelligent algorithms and models. 🔹 Data Scientist – Extracts actionable insights from complex datasets. 🔹 Machine Learning Engineer – Builds predictive and automated systems. 🔹 Data Analyst – Supports decision-making with statistical insights. 🔹 NLP Engineer – Creates systems that process and understand human language. 🔹 Computer Vision Engineer – Works with image and video data to develop intelligent visual applications.

These roles are in demand across IT, healthcare, e-commerce, finance, logistics, and more.

Why Choose Saraswati College of Engineering (SCOE) for AI and DS Engineering?

Saraswati College of Engineering (SCOE), Navi Mumbai, has quickly emerged as a center of excellence for AI and Data Science education. The college’s Department of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science is dedicated to shaping the future tech leaders of India.

Key Highlights of SCOE's AI & DS Department:

Industry-Aligned Curriculum – Crafted to keep pace with current and emerging tech trends.

Expert Faculty – A strong team with academic depth and real-world industry experience.

Hands-on Learning – Students gain practical skills through projects, workshops, and labs.

Corporate Collaborations – Strong partnerships with top companies for internships and placements.

Research Focus – Encouragement for students to explore research, participate in hackathons, and publish papers.

Strong Placement Support – A solid track record of placements in reputed companies and startups.

By enrolling in the AI and DS program at SCOE, students gain not only technical expertise but also the soft skills and industry exposure required to thrive in today’s competitive tech world.

Final Thoughts

Artificial Intelligence and Data Science are not just buzzwords—they are the driving forces behind modern innovation and transformation. As the world becomes more data-driven, the scope of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science Engineering in India is bound to expand rapidly.

For aspiring engineers, pursuing AI and DS from a reputed institution like Saraswati College of Engineering can be a gateway to exciting opportunities and a successful career in technology.

Ready to shape the future with AI and DS? Begin your journey at Saraswati College of Engineering today.

[iide-learningplatform]

AI and Data Analytics Course | Start your Career Now with IID

Looking to kickstart your career in AI or Data Science but not sure which course to choose in 2025? This blog breaks down the difference between Artificial Intelligence vs Data Science, career paths, salary trends, and top courses to pursue. Whether you're a student or a working professional, this guide helps you make the right choice for a future-ready tech career.

👉 Read the full blog: https://www.iid.org.in/blogs/confused-about-ai-data-science-courses-in-2025-heres-what-you-need-to-know

[scopethings-blog]

Scope Computers

"Kickstart your career with Data Science Training at Scope Computers! 🚀

Ready to dive into Data Science and revolutionize the tech world? Our expert-led, hands-on training program will teach you everything from data analysis to machine learning and AI, using the latest tools and techniques.

What you'll gain: 🔍 Expertise in Data Analytics, Machine Learning, and AI 🔧 Proficiency in Python, R, SQL, and more 📊 Real-world projects and case studies 🎓 Certification from a trusted institution 🚀 Career advancement opportunities

Transform your future. Enroll now with Scope Computers and unlock endless possibilities! 🌐💡"

[reasonsforhope]

"Calling it “a fridge to bridge the world,” the Thermavault can use different combinations of salts to keep the contents at temperatures just above freezing or below it. Some vaccines require regular kitchen fridge temps, while others, or even transplant organs, need to be kept below freezing, meaning this versatility is a big advantage for the product’s overall market demand.

Dhruv Chaudhary, Mithran Ladhania, and Mridul Jain are all children of physicians or medical field workers in the [city] of Indore. Seeing how difficult it was to keep COVID-19 vaccines viable en route to countryside villages hours outside city centers in tropical heat, they wanted to create a better, portable solution to keeping medical supplies cool.

Because salt molecules dissolve in water, the charged ions that make up the salt molecules break apart. However, this separation requires energy, which is taken in the form of heat from the water, cooling it down.

Though the teen team knew this, it remained a challenge to find which kind of salt would have the optimal set of characteristics. Though sodium chloride—our refined table salt—is what we think of when we hear the word “salt,” there are well over one-hundred different chemical compounds that classify as salt.

“While we did scour through the entire internet to find the best salt possible, we kind of just ended up back to our ninth-grade science textbook,” Chaudhary told Business Insider.

Indeed, the professors at the lab in the Indian Institutes of Technology where they were testing Thermavault’s prototype were experimenting with two different salts which ended up being the best available options, a discovery made after the three teens tested another 20, none of which proved viable.

These were barium hydroxide octahydrate and ammonium chloride. The ammonium chloride alone, when dissolved, cooled the water to between 2 and 6 degrees Celsius (about 35 to 43 degrees Fahrenheit) perfect for many vaccines, while a dash of barium hydroxide octahydrate dropped that temperature to below freezing.

“We have been able to keep the vaccines inside the Thermavault for almost 10 to 12 hours,” Dr. Pritesh Vyas, an orthopedic surgeon who tested the device at V One hospital in Indore, said in a video on the Thermavault website.

Designing a prototype, the teens have already tested it in local hospitals, and are in the process of assembling another 200 for the purpose of testing them in 120 hospitals around Indore to produce the best possible scope of use and utility data for a product launch.

Their ingenuity and imagination won them the 2025 Earth Prize, which came with a $12,500 reward needed for this mass testing phase."

-via Good News Network, April 22, 2025

[dpathshala]

[cgcjhanjeriblog]

BTech Artificial Intelligence and Data Science - CGC Jhanjeri

The scope of B. Tech. Artificial Intelligence and Data Science is broad. Every firm need data science to spot trends and developments in big data analytics. Data science employs a variety of approaches and tools to understand and forecast business outcomes from many data sources, including statistical analysis, data aggregation, and data mining. This is due to the large amount of daily data and the available computing capacity. As a result, a B. Tech. in Artificial Intelligence and Data Science is a lucrative career choice for students who want to start working immediately after graduation.

[catboybiologist]

Many billionaires in tech bros warn about the dangerous of AI. It's pretty obviously not because of any legitimate concern that AI will take over. But why do they keep saying stuff like this then? Why do we keep on having this still fear of some kind of singularity style event that leads to machine takeover?

The possibility of a self-sufficient AI taking over in our lifetimes is... Basically nothing, if I'm being honest. I'm not an expert by any means, I've used ai powered tools in my biology research, and I'm somewhat familiar with both the limits and possibility of what current models have to offer.

I'm starting to think that the reason why billionaires in particular try to prop this fear up is because it distracts from the actual danger of ai: the fact that billionaires and tech mega corporations have access to data, processing power, and proprietary algorithms to manipulate information on mass and control the flow of human behavior. To an extent, AI models are a black box. But the companies making them still have control over what inputs they receive for training and analysis, what kind of outputs they generate, and what they have access to. They're still code. Just some of the logic is built on statistics from large datasets instead of being manually coded.

The more billionaires make AI fear seem like a science fiction concept related to conciousness, the more they can absolve themselves in the eyes of public from this. The sheer scale of the large model statistics they're using, as well as the scope of surveillance that led to this point, are plain to see, and I think that the companies responsible are trying to play a big distraction game.

Hell, we can see this in the very use of the term artificial intelligence. Obviously, what we call artificial intelligence is nothing like science fiction style AI. Terms like large statistics, large models, and hell, even just machine learning are far less hyperbolic about what these models are actually doing.

I don't know if your average Middle class tech bro is actively perpetuating this same thing consciously, but I think the reason why it's such an attractive idea for them is because it subtly inflates their ego. By treating AI as a mystical act of the creation, as trending towards sapience or consciousness, if modern AI is just the infant form of something grand, they get to feel more important about their role in the course of society. Admitting the actual use and the actual power of current artificial intelligence means admitting to themselves that they have been a tool of mega corporations and billionaires, and that they are not actually a major player in human evolution. None of us are, but it's tech bro arrogance that insists they must be.

Do most tech bros think this way? Not really. Most are just complict neolibs that don't think too hard about the consequences of their actions. But for the subset that do actually think this way, this arrogance is pretty core to their thinking.

Obviously this isn't really something I can prove, this is just my suspicion from interacting with a fair number of techbros and people outside of CS alike.

[sunarryn]

Dp X Marvel #6

They called him Wraith.

Not Phantom. Not Fenton. Not Danny. Those names belonged to a ghost of a boy that never made it out of a cold, steel lab buried beneath the earth—forgotten by the world, forsaken by the stars. Wraith was something else. A project. A weapon. An experiment that should have failed but didn’t. The product of every nightmare HYDRA ever dared to dream. Not even the Red Room could engineer something so devastating. Not even Arnim Zola’s data-crazed AI mind could fathom the scope of him. Even the Winter Soldier—their perfect killer—trembled at the mere scent of Wraith in the air. He was the one he whispered about when the old ghosts came clawing through his fractured memories. “The one they locked away. The one even I wasn’t allowed to see.”

They started with the basics: a perfected version of the Super Soldier Serum. Not the knockoffs that littered the black market. Not the diluted trash the Flag Smashers used. No, this was the pure, concentrated essence of bioengineered physical supremacy. It made him fast. Strong. Deadly. But that wasn’t enough. HYDRA didn’t want a man—they wanted a god.

They replaced his bones with vibranium, stolen from the very heart of Wakanda in a mission so secret even the Dora Milaje never learned of it. His skeleton was a lightweight fortress, a perfect balance between flexibility and unbreakability. He could be shot point-blank with an anti-tank rifle and not flinch. He could leap from ten thousand feet and land without cracking a toe. His spine alone was stronger than most armored vehicles.

They burned out his organs, one by one, replacing them with biochemical synth-constructs, living machines that pulsed with a power that didn’t belong in the realm of science. His lungs filtered radiation. His kidneys could process raw acid. His stomach could digest metal. Disease didn’t touch him. Poisons turned inert inside him. He didn’t age. He didn’t sleep. He didn’t need to.

His blood… wasn’t blood. It shimmered when it moved. Viscous and luminous, like glowing starlight mixed with oil. Warm, but synthetic. Slick, but alive. It wasn’t just Extremis. It wasn’t just ectoplasm. It was something else entirely. Something that hummed when it moved, that responded to emotion, that sparked with eldritch light when he was angry. It healed him before injury even registered. It whispered to him in languages he never learned but somehow knew. It could ignite with a thought and turn his veins into conduits of fire and ice and terror. They bled him once, just to see what would happen. The blood ate through the floor, hissed like a serpent, and disappeared through the cracks. The lab tech who performed the procedure dissolved within thirty seconds.

And then there was his skin. It was soft, warm, perfectly human. If you touched him, he felt like a boy in his late teens—young, firm, deceptively fragile. But beneath that flawless layer of polymer-fused dermal tissue was something that didn’t burn, didn’t freeze, didn’t shatter. He walked through fire. He dove into the Mariana Trench. He stood unflinching beneath arctic storms and tropical cyclones. He once fought a vibranium-clawed assassin barehanded and didn’t bleed. The assassin didn’t survive.

But the worst part—what made him truly unkillable—was his heart and his brain.

They didn’t understand what they’d done. HYDRA liked to pretend they were gods, but even gods get scared when they tamper with forces they don’t understand. His heart wasn’t just a pump anymore—it was a fusion of quantum mechanics, biomechanical tubing, and something that throbbed with ectoplasmic radiation. It pulsed at its own rhythm, immune to external manipulation. It couldn’t be stopped. You could shoot him in the chest, burn him to ash, decapitate him—and the heart would keep beating. Worse, it could restart him.

The brain was worse. They hadn’t just enhanced his intelligence. They hadn’t just implanted neural tech and a language matrix and memories from assassins, soldiers, pilots, hackers, spies. No. They’d opened a door in his mind. They’d let something in. Something ancient. Something not from this world. Something not even from this dimension. It whispered to him when the moon was full. It guided his hands during missions. It told him where to strike, who to kill, what to become. Sometimes he heard it laughing.

Sometimes he laughed with it.

Wraith was the culmination of every evil science, every secret experiment, every whispered nightmare stitched together into a boy-shaped thing that wore a black suit and a bored expression and had a voice so calm it made seasoned killers nervous. He could walk into a room, look at you with those sky-blue eyes, and make your heart stop—because something about him was wrong. Not obviously wrong. Not monstrous or alien or robotic. No. It was subtle. A slowness to his smile. A tilt to his head. A precision to his movements that screamed in the back of your brain: This isn’t human. This is pretending to be human.

He escaped, of course. Nothing like him could be contained forever. The facility was a ruin within minutes. Bodies left stacked like cordwood. Walls melted. Floors cracked open. Not even the cameras could capture his escape—the footage was corrupted by a static that made your teeth ache and your eyes bleed. Every hard drive in the facility burned itself from the inside out. There was no trace of the boy they once called Danny Fenton.

Now, there are sightings. Rumors. Whispers. In Madripoor, they say he took down a cartel by himself, and the sky turned green when he screamed. In New York, people say he walked past the Sanctum Sanctorum and Doctor Strange flinched like he’d seen death. Wakandan scouts report strange readings near vibranium deposits—heat signatures that vanish into thin air. S.H.I.E.L.D. has classified him as an Omega-level threat.

The Winter Soldier? He saw him once. In an alley in Prague. Wraith didn’t attack. Didn’t speak. Just stared at him with those glacial eyes before disappearing in a flicker of light that bent reality itself. He didn’t sleep for three days after. When asked what was wrong, he just whispered, “They built something worse than me. And it remembers everything.”

Maybe there’s still a boy inside him, buried under steel and fire and ectoplasm and pain. Maybe that boy is screaming. Maybe he’s plotting. Maybe he’s just waiting. After all, you don’t build something like Wraith and expect him to stay still. You don’t break a boy into a god and expect him to forget.

[is-the-post-reliable]

I wanted to practice media literacy, but something that keeps coming up is reaffirming to trust what a majority of scientists and doctors believe rather than the fringe ones who may be trying to sell you something. And I agree with that, but I keep getting this bad feeling in the back of my mind because, well, I remember learning about how a lot of different scientific fields are based in ableism, racism, misogyny, etc. Like, for example, a majority of doctors in the US are in favour of invasive and traumatizing surgeries on intersex infants to "fix" them, while intersex adults advocate against these surgeries.

Will this come up in the later courses and discussions on media literacy? Stuff like, trusting the scientific method even if the general consensus is scewed due to being a part of an oppressive system? Thank you ☆

hi! so first of all, I want to start by saying this is probably outside of the scope of this blog to definitively answer - this kind of issue could be debated forever. Also, I want to clarify that I’m not trying to give a ‘course’ here, I’m not a teacher in any way, I’m just some guy who likes fact checking

So with that in mind, I think we should definitely acknowledge that scientific communites are made up of people, who all have their own biases. Social beliefs absolutely have, and will continue, to affect our scientific understanding. That being said, I don’t think that bias is inherent to the scientific method - in actuality, it’s the opposite. When biases affect the research, that’s bad science, which is exactly what media literacy and scientific literacy helps us distinguish. Essentially, I don’t think that these biases are a reason to not practice media literacy. Media literacy is what helps us to think critically about these things.

To use your own example, surgical intervention on intersex infants was based on little data, and became the normalised ‘treatment’ before any rigorous studies were done. It’s the introduction of proper scientific method in medical care that has helped to change our understanding of surgical intervention, and is now pushing to limit surgeries on intersex infants.

From the American Journal of Bioethics: ‘However, the main empirical premises behind this approach, namely, that significant psychosocial benefits would in fact accrue to the child because of early surgery and that these benefits would, moreover, reliably outweigh the associated risks of physical and mental harm, were never subjected to rigorous testing (Creighton and Liao Citation2004; Liao et al. Citation2019). Rather, standard practice in this area became entrenched and institutionalized long before the advent of modern evidence-based medicine (Diamond and Beh Citation2008; Garland and Travis Citation2020a; Dalke, Baratz, and Greenberg Citation2020) as well as key developments in bioethics and children’s rights (Brennan Citation2003; Reis Citation2019; Alderson Citation2023; Gheaus Citation2024).‘

[drdemonprince]

why do psychologists and therapists and counselors etc not tell us about the more science-y aspects of mental health? i read something recently about how humans will basically always chase after their next goal because they won’t remain satisfied when they reach a previous goal and there was an actual name for why this occurs and hearing that helped me, but it feels like mental health professionals generally keep this sort of stuff behind the curtain.

What you are describing is really more of a theoretical interpretation of data on human happiness that not every psychologist is taught about, and certainly is not taught to interpret in that specific way.

There are so many different subfields of psychology and therapeutic schools, and they really all have their own agendas and only study a very limited scope of the human experience, and so what a professional "knows" (that is, what they have been told is a fact) and what they believe about it varies a huge amount.

You'd basically need to talk to someone who studies positive psychology, evolutionary psychology, or existential psychology (or a combination of all three) to get that particular perspective that you have just shared. It's one I agree with, but even then, it's still just a perspective.

Psychologists know a lot less than you might think. And most of what we do is interpretation of what data does exist that we happen to be aware of. None of us know all the research on every subject -- on average, each one us knows probably about 2-3% of what's currently out there getting published, if that, and what we get taught in school is informed by our own mentors' agendas. A lot of psychologists never stop believing exactly what their mentors believed, no matter how biased or out of date it is. Not all of us are trained to think scientifically, even, or how to conduct research.

A lot less is truly knowable or objective than you probably realize. But this itself is a philosophy of science question, and most people (including most psychologists) are not trained in the philosophy of science, either, so they don't even know that what they "know" is subject to debate, or where that "knoweldge" came from methodologically.

[literaryvein-reblogs]

Writing Notes: Philosophy

Philosophy - aims to ascertain basic existentialist truths of the world around us.

The term comes from “philosophia,” a word that has Greek and Latin origins.

Philosophers examine the nature of reality by posing philosophical questions or problems that they then attempt to solve through critical thinking.

Branches of Philosophy

Much of the value of philosophy lies in the specialization and categorization of philosophical questions that cannot be easily answered with empirical data or scientific knowledge.

Scholars organize such questions into different branches of thought, although there are perhaps as many ways of categorizing the different branches as there are scholars.

Here are just 3 of the potentially dozens of branches of philosophy:

Epistemology: Also called the theory of knowledge, this analytic philosophy studies the scope, validity, and extent of human knowledge—in other words, concepts surrounding how we can confirm what we think we know is true. Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason is an example of epistemology. In this work, Kant disagrees with philosopher David Hume, that our experiences and perceptions of things are subjective—therefore, our knowledge of things is not universal. Epistemology overlaps with many other branches of philosophy since human knowledge is relevant in other areas, such as the philosophy of language and the philosophy of mind.

Ethics: The moral philosophy of ethics is one of the oldest and broadest branches of philosophy. Ethics works to debate values of good and evil and questions where human actions fall on that spectrum. The ancient Greeks struggled with these questions as they developed their societies along two schools of thought—Stoicism and Epicureanism. Although these two schools, established in 300 BC, shared several tenets, they differed in describing the best way to live. Stoics believed that living a just and virtuous life was paramount, while Epicureans believed the search for pleasure should be the highest priority. Due to its broad nature, ethics is pervasive in nearly every academic discipline and overlaps within several other areas of thought, including the philosophy of history, the philosophy of law, and the philosophy of religion.

Metaphysics: The principles of metaphysics question our place in the world and the meaning of life and human existence. Metaphysics, like ethics, began as one of the main branches of philosophy in ancient Greece. One of the premier philosophical works that established the branch was Aristotle’s Physics. In exploring the working mechanics of our reality, Aristotle created foundations of thought that became important to western institutions and religions, like Christianity. Aristotle’s work greatly influenced the thirteenth-century Italian priest Thomas Aquinas, who utilized aspects of Aristotle’s philosophy of nature to confirm the existence of God as the omnipotent architect of the universe. Metaphysics often encompasses or overlaps with the philosophy of science—for example, as scientists grapple with questions related to humanity’s literal and figurative place in the universe.

Historical Figures of Eastern Philosophy

Learn how these notable eastern philosophers shaped their cultures with religion and philosophical breakthroughs throughout the history of philosophy:

Laozi (born circa 570 BCE): The historical existence of Laozi, or Lao Tzu, is disputed, but some believe the Chinese philosopher is the author of the Tao Te Ching, a manuscript central to the philosophical religion known as Daoism (or Taoism). The metaphysical and ethical philosophy promotes living in harmony with nature and doing no harm to others.

Confucius (551–479 BCE): The teachings of this Chinese philosopher and politician formulated the basic tenets of East Asian societies. Known as Confucianism, the Chinese philosophy encouraged family loyalty, ancestral appreciation, and education—concepts that remain important to modern Chinese traditions.

Siddhartha Gautama (born in fifth century BCE): Historians and academics dispute the facts of the life of Siddhartha Gautama, also known as the Buddha. By some traditions, he was born into an aristocratic family and enjoyed an entitled life until he decided to pursue a nomadic and ascetic lifestyle. Over time, people attributed teachings to him on self-restraint, meditation, and mindfulness—ideas that grew into a popular world religion.

Jalāl ad-Dīn Mohammad Rūmī (1207–1273): A thirteenth-century Persian poet, Jalāl ad-Dīn Mohammad Rūmī wrote Quranic verses and Sufi poems that scholars still translate and publish today. A large part of philosophy in Rumi’s poetry is his set of values around love and religion. His philosophy of life focused on using art and self-expression to bring humans closer to God.

Historical Figures of Western Philosophy

Ancient Greek philosophers established western philosophy as early as the sixth century BCE. Here are a handful of Greek philosophy figures who created theoretical foundations and frameworks that future generations could use to question their own complex societies:

Socrates (470–399 BCE): The Athenian philosopher Socrates is credited as the founding father of western philosophy and the Socratic method—a form of questioning that scholars in multiple areas of philosophy use to pinpoint shortcomings in logic or beliefs. His teachings were never published but lived on through the work of his student, Plato.

Plato (428/427–348/347 BCE): An influential thinker of the classical Greek period, Plato is famous for his theory of forms, which questions the connection between our minds and reality. He is also remembered for his several published works, like The Republic, which communicated his social and political philosophy.

Aristotle (384–322 BCE): The philosopher Aristotle was a star pupil of Plato’s (another ancient philosopher) and went on to found his own school, called Lyceum. During his career, Aristotle collected and simplified the philosophies of his predecessors and contributed to philosophical work in nearly every aspect of classical Greek culture. He was the first ancient philosopher to analyze the concept of free will.

René Descartes (1596–1650): A French mathematician and philosopher, René Descartes is best known for the existentialism theories he put forth in Discourse on the Method and his statement: ��I think, therefore I am.” Descartes’ natural philosophy and metaphysical inquiries, as well as his thoughts on the existence of God, established him as a pioneer of modern philosophy.

Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770–1831): German philosopher Georg Hegel is best known for his metaphysical concept known as idealism. The concept dictates that the perceptions of a self-conscious mind result in the most accurate interpretations of concrete objects. His work had a dramatic impact on western philosophy in the twentieth century and influenced the works of philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Nietzsche.

Source ⚜ More: Notes & References ⚜ Writing Resources PDFs

[sturns-mermaid]

CHAPTER ONE: MYSTERY JUICE

master list | intro | ask about them here

WARNINGS: mentions of death/dying, drinking an unknown substance, coughing up dirt, mentions of being burried, frankenstein transformation?

wc: 1.1k

The faint clink of the glass slide against the microscope’s metal stage echoed softly in the quiet basement. Matt leaned in, furrowing his brows as he adjusted the lens, one eye squinting through the scope. The air smelled faintly of dust and old paper, cool against your skin as you shifted in the squeaky swivel chair.

Its wheels rolled lazily over the cracked concrete floor as you leaned forward on the counter. "Find anything interesting?" you asked, breaking the hush that hung between you.

 

The chair’s wheels squeaked softly as you shifted, watching Matt hunch over the microscope. He only hummed in response, too focused on the experiment he was running for class. It was always hard to get his attention when he slipped into his zone, his brain running a mile a minute as he carefully tried to collect every scrap of data.

Your fingers tapped absently against the counter as you watched him adjust the slide for the fifth time, eyes narrowed in concentration. You’d long given up on trying to follow what he was doing; science talk wasn’t your language. The lights flickered overhead, washing the room in a cold, sterile glow. You hated to admit it, but his basement gave you the creeps. One slide after another, Matt studied them all, some twice, no matter how many notes he took, he still couldn’t pinpoint the answer to the experiment. Matt didn’t notice you slipping away, too lost in the science world to care.

You were bored–and maybe a little thirsty. The mini fridge in the corner caught your eye. The fridge door groaned as you opened it, cold air brushing your face. Among cans of soda and half-eaten sandwiches sat a clutter of test tubes glowing faintly under the flickering light.

One test tube stood out–tall, capped, and filled with a shimmering green liquid that caught light when you shifted it. The label on the tube was written in messy handwriting, but it was now faded.

“Hey, Matt, what would happen if I drank this?” you giggled, watching as the liquid moved while you shook the tube. Matt didn’t even bat an eye; you weren’t sure if he even knew you were in the room anymore. It couldn’t be so bad, maybe it was some random beautifying serum he made, what’s the worst that could happen? The glass tube felt cold and slick in your hand.

You glanced over your shoulder–still no reaction from Matt. The tube felt heavier than it looked. Just a sip, you told yourself. It’s probably nothing.  You hesitated, eyeing the strange liquid sloshing inside, then tipped it back and took a sip.

The strange, mysterious liquid tastes minty, and it fizzed in your mouth almost like some sort of carbonated drink.  Heat bloomed in your chest, spreading to your fingertips. Your legs wobbled beneath you, and the floor seemed to tilt sideways.

“Hey–wait! Don’t drink that!” Matt’s voice finally broke through the haze, just as your knees buckled and the world went dark. 

You jolted upright with a ragged gasp, like surfacing from deep water. Cold air slammed into your lungs. Your chest burned. Your spine arched. You weren’t sure if you were breathing or choking. Your skin felt…wrong. Clammy. Too cold. Like you’d been asleep in a freezer. Your arms moved sluggishly, muscles twitching like they were just learning how to fire again. You blinked hard. The light overhead was harsh, unfamiliar.

The basement was still there, but older. Dustier. Different. Your fingers brushed the side of your neck, raised skin. Stitches. Metal. A bolt. Your heart, if it was even still your own, thudded violently in your chest. Your head turned slowly. Heavy. Like it didn’t belong to you. A silhouette of a man stood wearing a white coat, stubble covering his jaw. Your eyes narrowed.

Your brain scrambled, trying to place him. “Matt?” you croaked as if you hadn’t spoken in years. Your voice didn’t sound like your own. He stepped into view, older, worn down–but his eyes still locked onto yours with something between relief and guilt.

“You’re awake,” he breathed. “It worked. After five years…it worked.” Your body felt stiff, and you could hardly move. You lifted your hands into view, slow, trembling and froze.

That’s when you saw it. Your skin…it was green. You blinked rapidly, thinking your brain was playing tricks on you, but it remained the same green complexion. “It’ll take some getting used to,” Matt spoke softly, his voice thick with something you couldn’t name, regret, maybe. Pride. 

He approached you, sitting on the side of the metal operating table. Your legs felt as if they were filled with wet cement. Still, you shifted, forcing your feet to slide off the edge of the table. The cold floor touched your heels–numb, disoriented, and your knees wobbled as you tried to plant your feet flat.

“Take it slow,” Matt murmured from nearby, but he didn’t move to help you. You, however, didn’t want his help. You wanted to feel something real. Anything. Your arms trembled as you pushed against the edge of the metal table. Every joint creaked in protest, like your body didn’t quite remember how to be alive. With a shaky inhale, you forced yourself up. Your knees buckled immediately.

The world tilted, vision dimming at the edges–but your hands caught the edge of a nearby shelf just in time. Test tubes rattled.

“You’re doing good,” Matt said softly, like you were some lab rat performing well. You glared at him, breath ragged, heart hammering beneath your too-cold skin.

“What... What did you do to me?” he didn’t answer right away, not meeting your gaze.

His jaw clenched.

“I brought you back.” 

You froze. He brought you back? You couldn't remember anything, let alone what he brought you back from. Then you realized…your breath hitching at the thought. “Did I die?” you ask, you asked, voice cracking. Matt’s face was drained of color. He didn’t speak. You stared at him, the question echoing louder in your own head now. 

He couldn’t bring himself to answer you, not when you were looking at him like he just committed the most heinous crime known to man.

“Matt,” you whispered. He nodded. You couldn’t wrap your head around the fact. You died. You were dead, buried, gone. “If I died…then how am I even here?” you ask, your voice slightly scratchy as if you had something stuck in your throat. Matt just stared, silent.

“M-matt!” you tried to scream, but it came out as a dry croak. He couldn’t tell you, couldn’t see the reaction when you found out. You lunged forward, hacking violently. Clumps of dirt, spilled from your mouth. Dry and bitter against your tongue.

You stared at your shaking hands, soil caked beneath your nails.

You’d been buried. Underground.

Was this life? Or something stitched together to look like it?

dividers: @anitalenia @bleedingspiral

[scopethings-blog]

Scope Computers

Online Courses

Digital Marketing

Graphic Design

Data Science

(Admission Open)

Come & Join Now Fast

[victusinveritas]

From Rebecca Solnit:

This one is important. Share it widely. "Contrary to conventional wisdom, the size and scale of anti-Trump protests this year have dwarfed those in 2017, and they have been extraordinarily peaceful." Thank you Erica L Chenoweth and company. This portrait of who we are and how numerous we are is profoundly encouraging. May tomorrow be bigger yet (and everything suggests it will be).

The whole piece:

On streets and highway passes, at intersections and in parks, millions of Americans continue to turn out to protest against the Trump administration and its policies. The media spotlight is currently focused on the ongoing protests against ICE raids in Los Angeles, and the Trump administration’s militarized response to them. In our research at the Crowd Counting Consortium, we do not yet have a full picture of the number and range of protests that have occurred in June. However, we do know that protests against ICE raids have been intensifying around the country for months, alongside protests opposing perceived power-grabs by the Trump administration. And we know that the movement’s tactics have been extraordinarily peaceful.

In fact, as we discussed in March, protests in the U.S. have been quite robust since Trump took office the second time. Our ongoing research on protests in the United States reveals that within the first two weeks of the second Trump administration, protest activity surpassed that of 2017. By the end of March 2025, there had been three times as many protests as had taken place in 2017. Protest has been surging since, with large boosts coming from major, multi-location actions in April and May.

Two notable surges of protest came on the nationwide Hands Offs protests on April 5 and No Kings protests on April 19. To date, we have tallied 1,145 protests on April 5, with events occurring in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Significantly, protest activity occurred throughout the country, including in rural and GOP-leaning towns.

For April 19, we tallied 928 protests also occurring in all 50 states and D.C. And on May 1 and May 3, we tallied over 1,000 anti-Trump May Day protests.

These are significant showings. If we look back to the first Trump administration, in April 2017 the most prominent multi-location protest was the March for Science on April 22, which occurred in 390 locations including most major cities. In 2017, we tallied 80 May Day protests nationwide, compared to over 1,000 this year. Overall, 2017’s numbers pale in comparison to the scale and scope of mobilization in 2025 — a fact often unnoticed in the public discourse about the response to Trump’s actions.

The two days of organized nationwide protests account for most of these numbers. Among the 86 percent of anti-Trump events for which we tallied participation on April 5, we report between 919,000 and 1.5 million participants that day. Although our estimate is below the 5 million figure offered up by some accounts, April 5 clearly involved the most participants nationwide that we have seen during the second Trump administration — and the most we have recorded in a single day since the nationwide uprising following the killings of Ahmaud Arbery, George Floyd, and Breonna Taylor in 2020.

Having identified participant data for 64 percent of anti-Trump events on April 19, we report between 277,324 and 322,384 participants that day. These two events alone account for between 1.2 million and 1.8 million in participants. That number is higher when we account for the hundreds of other protests that occurred throughout the month of April.

Protest spreads

In addition to the size and scale of protest activity, the month of April alone saw a notable level of geographic dispersion. All 50 states and D.C. saw protests in the month of April. This suggests that the anti-Trump mobilization is truly nationwide.

We are often asked how many people have been participating in protests. Because of the size and scope of protest activity, we have not been able to validate participant totals on all events. But even with incomplete data on many events, and fewer reliable numbers of participants available in our May data, we estimate that millions of people participated in protests in April. Dana Fisher’s survey evidence from D.C.-area protests on April 5 suggests that Resistance 2.0 skews older than its 2017 counterpart; however, we do not know how representative this finding is countrywide, across different days, or across different actions.

Anecdotal evidence suggests that some activists are intentionally demonstrating in their local town rather than just traveling to a nearby big city for events. One participant suggested they may do so because it attracts neighbors who are new to protest: “There are people who aren’t going to cities for events like this. They’re dipping their toes in local rallies and activism. We need to meet them where they are.” Another highlighted that it may also make a different impression on passersby than a protest elsewhere: “This is why the protests should /not/ be D.C. or NY focused. When there’s 300 people in front of the local high school, and you go by there Saturday on the way to Walmart, it’s harder to claim it never happened. Or you didn’t see it.”

Notable themes

Throughout early 2025, Elon Musk and Tesla were a major target of protesters. Over 1,500 protests in April and May targeted Musk and Tesla. Such anti-Tesla protests may be connected to the company’s stock price falling significantly, and Musk stepping back from DOGE.

We continue to record considerable protest motivated by foreign affairs, including not only Israel-Palestine but also Russia-Ukraine as the Trump administration has expressed less support for the Ukrainian position on the war. About one in five protests in April were related to foreign affairs, not including immigration or climate change. (Small numbers of counter-protesters have also turned out to defend the president).

But immigration — and aggressive law enforcement responses to immigration-related protests — were key mobilizing issues in April and May. One notable episode in May was the arrest of Ras Baraka, the mayor of Newark, New Jersey, at Delaney Hall, an ICE detention facility. Video of the May 9 arrest has been shared widely, showing ICE and other law enforcement officials pushing through crowds of peaceful protesters to apprehend Baraka outside the facility. Baraka appears to have been allowed into Delaney Hall along with a delegation of federal legislators (from New Jersey) and then afterward asked to leave because he was not a member of Congress. He had already left the facility when law enforcement agents moved to detain him.

In addition to Mayor Baraka’s arrest, a member of the congressional delegation, Rep. LaMonica McIver, was subsequently charged by the U.S. Justice Department with assaulting two of the federal law enforcement officers who detained Baraka. This sparked further protests outside Delaney Hall, including the use of civil disobedience by an inter-faith group of clergy and religious figures, which resulted in two arrests. Protesters also vented their frustration directly at Alina Habba, interim U.S. attorney for New Jersey, who ordered the charges against Rep. McIver. Dozens demonstrated outside her Newark office on May 20.

By and large, in April and May the anti-Trump protest movement relied on protests and demonstrations rather than mass noncooperation, occupations of space or general strikes, though there have been exceptions and some public calls for such actions.

Out of 4,770 anti-Trump protests in April and May, we recorded police injuries at three events (.06 percent) and participant injuries or property damage at only two events (.04 percent). We have recorded arrests of protesters at 20 events, or .42 percent of the total. Roughly the same distribution held for protests related to immigration policies, which constituted a large share of the events.

Overall, in over 99.5 percent of protests in April and May, we recorded no injuries, arrests or property damage — an unprecedentedly tiny fraction for a movement of this size and geographic dispersion. Contrary to officials’ hyperbolic claims of a disorderly movement attempting to sow chaos, at least through April and May, protesters associated with the anti-Trump movement were extraordinarily nonviolent in their tactics.