#swrcb

[mattchlor123]

Ensuring Safe Drinking Water: The Critical Role of Water Main Chlorination and Disinfection

Access to safe drinking water is a fundamental human right and a cornerstone of public health. However, ensuring that potable water remains free from harmful contaminants requires stringent sanitation processes. One of the most critical steps in this process is water main chlorination and disinfection. This practice helps eliminate pathogens, prevent bacterial growth, and maintain water quality as it travels through distribution systems.

In states like California, where vast populations rely on complex water infrastructure, water line disinfection California services are essential. From new pipeline installations to emergency contamination events, professional chlorination ensures compliance with health standards and safeguards communities from waterborne diseases.

This article will explore the importance of water main disinfection, the methods used, regulatory requirements, and the role of industry experts in maintaining the integrity of drinking water systems.

The Importance of Water Line Disinfection

Water mains and distribution pipelines serve as lifelines, delivering treated water from reservoirs and treatment plants to homes, businesses, and institutions. However, these systems are susceptible to contamination at various stages.

Key Risks to Water Infrastructure:

New Installations & Repairs: When new pipes are laid or existing ones are repaired, they can introduce bacteria and other contaminants if not properly disinfected.

Main Breaks & Leaks: Cracks in aging pipelines can allow contaminants to enter the system, posing health risks.

Stagnation & Biofilm Growth: When water sits in pipelines for extended periods, bacteria can multiply, forming biofilms that are difficult to remove.

Cross-Connections & Backflow Issues: Improperly installed plumbing or backflow events can introduce pollutants into the drinking water supply.

To mitigate these risks, water main chlorination and disinfection are conducted before new pipelines are put into service, after repairs, and in response to contamination events.

Methods of Water Main Chlorination and Disinfection

There are several methods for disinfecting water mains, each with specific applications based on pipeline size, water quality, and contamination risk. The most common approaches include:

1. Continuous Feed Method

In this approach, chlorine is introduced at a controlled rate while water flows through the pipeline. This method ensures a uniform concentration of disinfectant throughout the system. It is commonly used when disinfecting new or extensively repaired water mains.

2. Slug Method

A high concentration of chlorine is introduced into a section of the pipeline, forming a "slug" of disinfectant that slowly moves through the system. This technique is effective for treating localized contamination and is often used when water lines have been stagnant.

3. Tablet Method

For newly installed pipelines, chlorine tablets can be placed inside before water is introduced. As water fills the pipe, the tablets dissolve, creating a disinfecting solution. This method is convenient but requires careful calculation to ensure proper chlorine concentration.

4. Shock Chlorination

In cases of severe contamination or emergency disinfection, a high dose of chlorine is applied for a short duration. After exposure, the system is thoroughly flushed to remove excess disinfectant before being returned to service.

Regulatory Standards for Water Line Disinfection in California

The California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) set strict regulations for drinking water safety. These agencies require that all potable water distribution systems comply with American Water Works Association (AWWA) standards, specifically:

AWWA C651 – Guidelines for disinfecting water mains

AWWA C652 – Guidelines for disinfecting water storage tanks

AWWA C653 – Guidelines for disinfecting water treatment facilities

Before a newly disinfected water main can be placed into service, water samples must be tested to confirm that total coliform bacteria levels are absent and that chlorine residual levels meet safety standards.

Compliance with these regulations ensures that water reaching consumers is safe, free from harmful microbes, and does not pose health risks.

The Role of Professional Disinfection Services

Given the complexity of water infrastructure, professional water line disinfection California services are critical in ensuring compliance and effectiveness. Companies like Matt Chlor specialize in providing expert disinfection services, including:

1. Comprehensive Disinfection Planning

Professionals assess water system conditions, determine appropriate chlorination methods, and ensure that disinfection meets regulatory standards.

2. Precise Chlorine Application & Monitoring

Trained technicians apply the correct concentration of chlorine, monitor residual levels, and adjust treatment protocols as necessary.

3. Bacteriological Testing & Certification

After disinfection, water samples are analyzed in certified laboratories to confirm the absence of bacteria and compliance with drinking water standards.

4. Emergency Response & Contamination Mitigation

In the event of contamination or water quality violations, rapid disinfection measures are implemented to restore safe drinking water.

By relying on experienced professionals, water utilities, municipalities, and private contractors can ensure that their distribution systems remain clean and safe for public consumption.

The Future of Water Disinfection Technologies

As water infrastructure continues to evolve, advancements in disinfection technology are improving efficiency and safety. Some emerging trends include:

1. UV Disinfection

Ultraviolet (UV) light is being integrated into water treatment systems as an additional layer of microbial protection. While chlorine remains essential, UV disinfection offers a chemical-free method of targeting bacteria and viruses.

2. Smart Monitoring & Automation

Modern disinfection systems now include real-time sensors that monitor chlorine levels, water flow, and contamination risks, allowing for automated adjustments to maintain water quality.

3. Alternative Disinfectants

Research into chloramine-based disinfection and other alternatives is helping reduce disinfection byproducts (DBPs) while maintaining microbial control.

As California and other regions seek to modernize water infrastructure, these innovations will play a crucial role in maintaining public health.

Conclusion: The Essential Role of Water Line Disinfection

Ensuring access to clean and safe drinking water is a shared responsibility between water authorities, utility companies, and professional disinfection services. Water main chlorination and disinfection remain vital in preventing contamination, complying with regulations, and safeguarding public health.

In California, where population growth and aging infrastructure pose challenges, partnering with experts like Matt Chlor ensures that water systems remain resilient and contamination-free. Whether for new installations, repairs, or emergency situations, professional water line disinfection California services provide the expertise and assurance needed to maintain high-quality drinking water.

By prioritizing proper disinfection practices and embracing innovative water treatment technologies, we can continue to protect communities and promote a healthier future for all.

[highvoltageindustries]

Congratulations to Christian Reyes for joining the County of Santa Clara, Roads and Airports Department as an Electrical Assistant. Christian is a student of our Electrical Construction and Maintenance & Water Supply Technology program. Congratulations Christian for taking the leap of faith and traveling up North for a new adventure. We wish all the best and we know that you are paving the way for many more to follow. 😎💧⚡️ #waterdistribution #watertreatment #wastewater #waterutility #waterjobs #cawaterjobs #lattc #waterutilityworker #waterutilityscience #watermath #statewaterresourcescontrolboard #cawater #publicworks #vocationaltraining #vocationaleducation #swrcb #cweamembers #wastewateroperator #waterdistributionoperator #watertreatmentoperator #industrialelectrician #electrician #metropolitanwaterdistrict #waterwisepro #waternerd #ibewlocal18 #careersstarthere #citylajobs #essintialemployee #electricaljobs Repost By @h2olattc (at Tag a Friend) https://www.instagram.com/p/CIZSklQHovJ/?igshid=mthrsj18o3fm

[cannabisbusinessexecutive]

The New Era of Carbon Negative Footprint Cannabis Cultivation

The New Era of Carbon Negative Footprint Cannabis Cultivation

By Bill Shevlin California grows some of the best cannabis in the world. Unfortunately, cultivation can have not-so-green consequences. From unregulated guerilla grows in the Emerald Triangle, to indoor cultivation in cities like Los Angeles, there are often negative side effects for the environment. High energy consumption, water shortages and the endless wasteful packaging that’s required under…

[kflemhealth]

Increased water tyranny in California threatens critical delta growing region

(Natural News) Drought conditions in the Golden State are worsening to the point that the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) is considering shutting down a pre-1914 water rights provision that allows farmers to divert water within the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta region. According to reports, the board is planning to convene in an Aug....

from NaturalNews.com https://ift.tt/3ymCqCp via IFTTT

[containerhomeideas]

Pardon Me Your SWPPP Is Showing

It was a dark and stormy night. You bolted upright in bed wondering if your SWPPP, under the supervision of the PM using BMP’s, would protect the BSA and ESA from the SAP the next day by the RWQCB and the SWRCB. You slept no more.

If you recognize the acronyms above, you understand that “dark and stormy nights” are a significant concern when you are immersed in the world of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP). Having a plan in place on a construction project is no guarantee against disasters, runaway costs, fines and potential work stoppages. Neither Mother Nature nor state and local SWPPP officials are predictable. The purpose of this article is not to offer technical advice on what a recent court decision called a “complicated web of federal and state laws and regulations concerning water pollution.”1 Indeed, that would be impossible in the few paragraphs allowed.

As you read this article simply remember this theme: “Effluent flows down hill.” Storm water and effluent do not always follow the same complicated web that the laws and regulations follow. Municipal handbooks on the subject are lengthy. For example, the Caltrans “Storm Water Quality Handbooks” are several hundred pages long and filled with diagrams and statutory references delving into minutiae; e.g. “…. proper composition and dimensions of wood stakes made of quality lumber and free from decay splits or cracks longer than the thickness of the stake…”zzzzzzzzz. Analysis of SWPPP laws and references could only excite those with a passion for reading tax regulations or whose hobbies include discussing the benefits of plastic versus vinyl pocket protectors.

The point of this short article is twofold: (i) to provide design professionals, owners, developers, and contractors with a broad overview of the “complicated web” of SWPPP; and (ii) to emphasize the importance of contractually allocating risk and responsibility for compliance with the applicable laws and regulations prior to filing for a permit.

The following anecdote illustrates the potential pitfalls and dangers of SWPPP. Only names and inconsequential facts have been changed to protect the innocent. Recently, a moderate-sized contractor began a project in Central California where the number of acres of soil to be exposed in the winter was significantly less than could be exposed in the summer.

The contractor obtained all permits and had a SWPPP applicable to a ten year rain incident as required by local agencies. Unfortunately, the project was delayed and large portions of the soil remained exposed to winter conditions. Unbeknownst to the contractor, the site had substantial colloidal clay soil. The type of clay was not detailed in the soils report because it was not relevant to compaction requirements.

As you guessed, there was a storm which exceeded the capacities of the project BMPs (Best anagement Practices). The retention basin constructed to catch storm water overflowed and cloudy water reached a nearby drain inlet. The contractor properly contacted its SWPPP consultant, who recommended draining the basin manually using a filter bag over the end of the drain outlet. That was done, but a governmental inspector “happened” by and noticed the cloudy discharge.

The inspector performed some rough arithmetic and concluded 18,000 gallons of cloudy water had been diverted into the creek. He also calculated a fine of $10 per gallon ($180,000) plus a $10,000 single day fine. Whereupon, the contractor nearly released some “effluent” of his own. What should the contractor have done? The contractor filed and followed a proper SWPPP and had the proper permit. The storm magnitude exceeded the SWPPP. A consultant was called for advice. That advice was followed. Nonetheless, the contractor or owner faced a potentially crushing $190,000 fine because of an unpredictable storm.

The problems did not end there. Colloidal clays are not uncommon in California and generally require chemical treatment for settlement to avoid cloudy runoff. On this project, chemical treatment would have had an initial cost of $30,000 – $50,000 and a monthly charge well into the thousands of dollars. Understandably, the principals did not anticipate the problem (or the fines) as the project was supposed to have been started in the summer.

The story had a somewhat happily-ever-after ending: Ultimately, the agency significantly reduced the fine based upon the Contractor’s efforts and a commitment by the Contractor to provide for additional SWPPP training of its supervisors-kind of like an environmental re-education camp.

Overview of SWPPP

Currently in California’s larger urban locations, construction sites with an area of one acre or greater must comply with the Federal CleanWater Act and other storm water runoff regulations. Smaller sites can also be included. The authority to issue permits for these projects, like effluent, flows downhill. The Federal Government requires California to comply with the Clean Water Act. The State enacts its own laws and grants its compliance authority to the various RWQCB’s, which then require compliance with the Federal and State laws by county and city governments. The local political entity, not wanting to be left out, enacts even more regulations and requires a project owner to comply with all of the laws and regulations for permitting. Each lower entity answers to the higher authority. Compliance starts at the local level, when the owner applies for a building permit. To obtain a building permit the owner must submit a SWPPP to the local agency.

The SWPPP is generally a collection of BMPs, specifications and other plans, all of which seek to avoid pollution and/or improper sediment release in storm water runoff. Generally, the SWPPP is designed to do three things:

1. Prevent water from contacting polluted work areas (e.g. oily wastes near a dock);

2. Keep pollutants off surfaces that contact water (e.g. avoid exposing contaminants near streams); and

3. Manage/clean storm water before it leaves the site and is discharged to the public storm drain (e.g. using filters or treatments to remove pollutants).

Many governmental entities produce publications identifying “standard” BMPs which can be adopted to help satisfy the SWPPP requirement and obtain a permit. These BMP’s are usually available through government websites.

To actually create the SWPPP, the owner contracts with one of three entities: a SWPPP consultant/engineer, the architect, or the general contractor. Ultimately, it is the owner who is responsible for non-compliance. Therefore, it is important and prudent that the contracts clearly designate and allocate responsibility for both SWPPP preparation and compliance. In addition, other burdens are placed on the parties, such as training of employees in SWPPP compliance.Remember, the life’s work of 100 geniuses can be undone in minutes by one person’s failure to pay attention to detail.

Avoiding violations of the SWPPP is crucial as penalties and sanctions can be costly. For example, the City of Sacramento can issue citations and fines of $5,000-$25,000 per day, and higher for per gallon violations. Not long ago a prominent local developer was hit with a fine of nearly $600,000 for dirt and chemical runoff by the Central Valley RWQCB. Depending on the severity of the violation, the enforcement can be as severe as a stop work notice.

Allocation of Risk for SWPPP Compliance

Many contractors and design professionals have horror stories of overly zealous inspectors. The story discussed at the outset of this article created several dilemmas. Who should pay the fine? Who should pay for chemical treatment? What happens if the fault is shared? Can the project be shut down and if so then what happens? How can the parties protest the fine, but keep the project on schedule? Answers to these questions are elusive and become difficult to find when parties are under the stress of substantial fines and shut down orders. Plan for the worst, and never assume the project will be confined to the dry season. There are multiple lessons to be taken from this article.

First, always plan to have soil exposed in the dry season. Second, ignore the first point. Third, use xperts in the field, know the regulations, make sure the involved parties are trained in pollution prevention, and do your best to cooperate with the inspectors. Fourth, have a clear agreement on responsibility for SWPPP compliance, and an established chain of command for emergency/storm conditions. Know how to reach the SWPPP consultant on weekends and “dark and stormy nights”. Fifth, have a well established procedure in place for the prompt payment of fines and a post-citation strategy to determine final responsibility. For example, a contractor or small design professional may not have the cash on hand to pay a $25,000 fine. What happens then?!

Sixth, create a plan for cooperation between the involved parties to get the citation resolved or reduced; pay the fine (if levied) and keep the project moving forward. In the earlier example, the contractor did nothing wrong. Should the contractor have to pay the huge fine or should the owner (orshould someone else)? It is imperative to know these answers before you are standing knee deep in “effluent”. Seventh, the parties should contractually agree to a method for meeting unexpected conditions requiring expenditures of money for new or additional SWPPP requirements. It does no good to have the project stalled while the parties argue about responsibility for the pending problems.

The contractor and owner in the anecdote were fortunate that the local agency was “reasonable” in reducing the fine (even though the contractor had followed the SWPPP). The reduction made it possible to continue the project. However, it is not reasonable to assume that all governmental agencies or individual inspectors will handle the issues as that agency did.

It is a fair assumption that SWPPP requirements are here to stay. The requirements, however laudable, should be expected to become even more burdensome. Knowing SWPPP responsibilities ahead of time will help keep the inevitable disputes to a manageable level. Compliance with the permit requirements, as well as all governmental regulations, is a must. However, because compliance relies in part on Mother Nature, noncompliance is the rule not the exception.

Remember the important maxim of construction projects: “effluent” flows downhill. Plan ahead. Use experts. Know the regulations. Contractually allocate risk. Stay on time.

Source by John D Broghammer Pardon Me Your SWPPP Is Showing

[sabrinawhill]

Nearly Half of Annual Water Use Reports Still Need to be Filed

Nearly Half of Annual Water Use Reports Still Need to be Filed

The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) is warning water rights holders that failure to file their annual reports will result in significant fines.  Annual water use reports for all appropriative water rights including permits, licenses, registrations and certificates, were initially due on April 1.  According to the Board, only 57 percent of those with appropriative water rights had…

[madlyreproducti]

New Wetlands Protections in California Proposed - SWRCB Votes to Adopt Regulations that Could Impact Permitting Procedures

The State Water Resources Control Board voted this week to increase state protections for wetlands by adopting both a new wetlands definition and procedures for obtaining associated dredge and fill permits. The regulations create a more expansive...By: Best Best & Krieger LLP from Zoning, Planning & Land Use RSS Feed | JD Supra Law News http://bit.ly/2uOw6EI

[reginaperes157]

California farm water pump

Gov-auctions.org - #1 Government & Seized Auto Auctions. Cars 95% Off!

California's State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) voted Wednesday to approve the Bay-Delta plan, which will re-allocate water from farms and cities to the environment in an effort to restore dwindling fish numbers.

Legally Concealed Courses - Firearms, Concealed Carry, Survival

from Regina Perez RSS Feed http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/breitbart/~3/kiISUSbzGFc/ via IFTTT

[investmart007]

Fresno, CA | Valley Congressmen Costa, Denham, and McClintock Continue Fighting the Water Grab

New Post has been published on https://www.stl.news/fresno-ca-valley-congressmen-costa-denham-and-mcclintock-continue-fighting-the-water-grab/169603/

Fresno, CA | Valley Congressmen Costa, Denham, and McClintock Continue Fighting the Water Grab

Fresno, CA – Valley Congressmen Jim Costa (D-CA-16), Jeff Denham (R-CA-10), and Tom McClintock (R-CA-4) continue their fight to protect San Joaquin Valley water from the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) ��Water Grab.”

“I will use every option I have to fight the Water Grab,” Costa said. “This is about fighting bad science used to justify taking water from one region of California. This is about the future of the Valley and protecting our way of life.”

“Sacramento’s water grab is in violation of federal law,” Denham said. “We will not allow them to take our water; the future of the Valley depends on it.”

“The proposal to regularly drain our reservoirs for the sole purpose of dumping water into the ocean is lunacy,” McClintock said. “Common sense will prevail.”

This week, the Congressmen sent a joint message to the Acting Administrator for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), urging him to enforce the requirement in the Clean Water Act that water quality criteria be supported by “rigorous, sound science.” The EPA has notified the Board that the science supporting Phase I of the Water Quality Control Plan for the Bay-Delta (WQCP) is deficient.

This is just the latest action by the Valley Congressmen, who have been working in a bipartisan fashion to help protect Valley water.

Last month, the members sent a strong message to the Chair of California’s State Water Resources Control Board, Felicia Marcus, stating they would intervene if the Board took action that interfered with water projects or processes managed by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, including the Central Valley Project, the New Melones Dam, and the water rights permits for the State Water Project.

Last week, the members called on U.S. Speaker of the House Paul Ryan to prioritize a provision in this year’s Department of Interior appropriations bill that will prevent federal dollars from being used to implement the WQCP. Congressmen Denham and Costa spearheaded the provision in the House’s version of the spending bill, which passed the House on July 18th.

—–

SOURCE: news provided by costa.house.gov on September 12, 2018.

[environmentguru]

Statewide Standards for Storm Water Capture and Infiltration Dry Wells

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)Due Date: March 7, 2018 3:00 PM https://www.environmentguru.com/pages/bids/opportunity.aspx?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=tumblr&id=6059797

[racketnews]

Nestle has been bottling and selling water it has no right to in drought-stricken California, state says

Fights over water are a constant in California, exacerbated when drought years make the supply especially scarce. Since 2015, officials with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) had received numerous complaints that Nestlé was claiming water from the San Bernardino National Forest to which it had no right and then selling it under its Arrowhead brand. http://dlvr.it/Q7zgY7

[csu-wrpi]

Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator III (Special Districts)*

Salary:$21.86 - $28.68 Hourly $3,789.07 - $4,971.20 Monthly $45,468.80 - $59,654.40 Annually

Location:Throughout San Bernardino County, CA

Job Type:Full-time

Department:Special Districts

Job Number:16-46173-02

Closing date and time:Continuous

The Job

THIS IS A SPECIAL DISTRICTS POSITION ONLY San Bernardino County has reciprocity with CalPERS and other California '37 Act counties.

Excellent  Benefits Package includes: Paid Time Off – Vacation, Sick, and 14 Paid Holidays Certification Differential Compensation available Certification Renewal reimbursement Uniforms and Cleaning provided Footwear Voucher (up to $200) Access to Annual Tuition, Training, and Membership Reimbursement Funds (up to $1500) Overtime & Shift Differential Compensation available On-Call and Call-Back Compensation available Medical and Dental Benefits, Premium Subsidy Option to participate in Medical Expense Reimbursement Plan (FSA) Generous County retirement pension (vested after 5 years); Retirement Medical Trust Fund Option for 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan Employer Paid Life Insurance - $35,000 Perfect Attendance Incentive CLICK HERE to view the complete list of benefits offered

The Water and Sanitation Division is recruiting for Wastewater Treatment Plant Operators III who are responsible for the safe and economical operation and maintenance of water distribution, water treatment, wastewater collection and wastewater treatment facilities. Duties consist of operating wastewater treatment facilities to control flow and processing of wastewater to meet discharge permits; coordinating and assisting with preventive and corrective maintenance projects on water/wastewater systems throughout the County; and optimizing water/wastewater treatment system's processes to ensure regulatory compliance and water quality are maintained at all times. These positions are assigned to Special Districts only; work sites are located throughout the County, including high/low deserts, mountains, and valleys. *Official Title: Treatment Plant Operator III (Special Districts). For more detailed information, refer to the job description.

CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT

Health and Physical: Persons seeking appointment to this class must meet the health and physical condition standards deemed necessary and proper for performance of the duties established by the San Bernardino County Special Districts Department. Certification:   A) Additional compensation may be available for employees possessing certifications at a higher level than required for the assigned site, and/or for specialized industry-specific certifications.     B) Must obtain a State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Water Distribution Operator Grade D1 certification within 12 months or 2 consecutive test cycles, from date of employment; failure to do so may result in return to former classification or termination.   C) Must obtain a SWRCB Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade III within 18 months of employment; failure to do so may result in return to former classification or termination. License: Must obtain and maintain a CA Class A unrestricted driver license with tanker endorsement within 18 months of employment, or be terminated. Travel: Travel throughout the County is required. A valid CA driver license and proof of automobile liability insurance is required at time of appointment. Assignment: Employees on call must respond by phone within 30 minutes. Employees may be assigned to one region, but are expected to work any site located throughout the County, to meet the Department's needs. Incumbents are required to be available on-call evenings, weekends, and holidays, as needed. Sites/locations encompass the mountains, the deserts, and the valleys.

Minimum RequirementsMust meet all of the following:

Certification:  Current Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade II, issued by the CA State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB).

    -AND-

Experience: Two (2) years of recent experience (within the last 5 years) as an operator in a Wastewater Treatment plant.

    -AND-

License: Must possess a valid CA Class C or higher driver license.

Copy of required certificate must be attached to the application.Desired Qualifications

The ideal candidates will have lead worker experience with other Water Plant Operators, as well as a CA class A driver license, in addition to possession of the SWRCB Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade III certification, SWRCB D2 Water Distribution certification, SWRCB T2 Water Treatment certification, California Water Environment Association (CWEA) Collection System Grade 2 certification, and San Bernardino County Back Flow certification, along with experience using SCADA computer program.

Selection ProcessThe examination process will consist of a competitive evaluation of qualifications based on a review of the Application and the Supplemental Questionnaire; therefore, it is to your advantage to provide as much detailed and relevant work experience as possible, as a resume will not be accepted or reviewed in lieu of the application materials.

Applications will be accepted and processed until a sufficient number of qualified applications have been received.  This recruitment may close without further notice; interested candidates should apply as soon as possible.

APPLY: https://www.governmentjobs.com/jobs/1543154/wastewater-treatment-plant-operator-iii-special-districts

[environmentguru]

Groundwater Resources Association''s Legislative Symposium

Symposium speakers include Senate and Assembly leadership, Water Committee Chairs and members, Administration Officials from the Governor`s office, DWR, SWRCB and more.  Speakers for the 2018 Symposium are not yet confirmed and always subject to https://www.environmentguru.com/pages/elements/element.aspx?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=tumblr&id=5962023

[environmentguru]

The New River Improvement Project (NRIP)

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)Due Date: November 30, 2017 4:00 PM https://www.environmentguru.com/pages/bids/opportunity.aspx?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=tumblr&id=5565450

[environmentguru]

Laboratory Analytical Services

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)Due Date: October 20, 2017 4:00 PM https://www.environmentguru.com/pages/bids/opportunity.aspx?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=tumblr&id=5521095

[environmentguru]

Helicopter Services

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)Due Date: December 11, 2017 3:00 PM https://www.environmentguru.com/pages/bids/opportunity.aspx?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=tumblr&id=5467490