#values of imaginary numbers

Explore tagged Tumblr posts

Visit Tumblr Blog

Explore Tumblr blogs with no restrictions, modern design and the best experience.

Last Seen Tumblr Blogs

candidmagic3

Candid Magic

7 posts

miss-goodie-2shoes

just some girl who's in WAY too way fandoms.

336 posts

hyliansunflower

~Hylian Sunflower~

17K posts

nightmareboy00

Your Nightmare

151 posts

ddctduk

Dedicated Diamond Cartel

742 posts

Fun Fact

The total number of visits Tumblr.com received during January 2021 is 327 million.

itsgerges · 8 months ago

Text

Best Regards

The Sun Can NOT Be Created Before The Planets Creation

Paper Major hypothesis

The Sun Is NOT Doing Nuclear Fusion To Produce Its Rays- Instead - The Planets Motions Energies Total Is Used To Produce The Sun Rays- That's Why The Sun Can Not Be Created Before The Planets Creation And Motion

In Fact- The Sun Is A Phenomenon created by the planets motions- means- The Planets were created and moving in their orbits before the sun creation- the planets were revolving around a point in space for a long period of time before the sun creation and the sun is created and put on this point around which the planets revolve-

This fact shows the great gap between the solar system facts and the physics book-

BUT- Can This Theory Be A Fact? let's see how this can be possible

(i)

This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsnHYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"ei=83

This new article tells the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam- I claim the sun rays are produced based on this method by the gravitational waves motions and not by the sun nuclear fusion process- also –No star rays is produced by the nuclear fusion process but all rays are created by the gravitational waves motions energies as the article states-

Here we see the article produces a light beam by different source of energy (the gravitational waves motions energy) in place of the sun mass which is used by the nuclear fusion process to produce the sun rays- here – the source of energy is the motion energy of the gravitational waves

The importance here is that- the solar system is rich in the motion energy and by that the sun mass as a source of energy is not required

(ii)

I claim

The gravitational waves are created by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field-let's see if this can be possible

Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2), where's Planet motion energy? the planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body because it would raise its temperature and No planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically- the planet motion energy is stored in the space in waves form- means- Planet motion energy creates waves in the space- Planet motion in the space is similar to a fish swimming in the sea- as the fish swimming creates waves in the water the planet motion energy creates waves in the space- let's see this picture clearly- the fish swims because it hits the water by its body and that creates waves in the water- we conclude, the water waves move by a velocity equal the fish velocity because of the reaction force- similar to that- Planet moves in the space and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity equal the planet velocity- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by equal velocity (47.4 km/s)- based on this idea- All planets move and their motions energies create waves in the space where each wave moves by velocity equal its planet velocity

AND

The planets revolve around the sun in the same one direction and for that their motions energies create waves in the space and these waves move perpendicular on the revolution direction (Toward Pluto orbit)

AND

In Pluto orbit these waves are unified together into one unified wave- this wave moves by a velocity = 205.8 km/s why? The 9 planets velocities total=176 km/s but I add the Earth moon velocity (29.8 km/s) that makes the total to be 205.8 km/s – I add the moon velocity because the energy is stored finally in the moon orbit-

Note- The moon and the Earth revolve around the sun together for that the moon velocity is considered equal the Earth velocity relative to (the sun) –

Shortly

The planets motions energies are unified into unified wave revolve around the sun and moves by velocity (205.8 km/s) and this is the gravitational waves

The question is that

The scientists discovered waves in the space and they told these waves are produced by the gravitational field but why?? because planet motion energy analysis proves the motion energy must be stored in the space as moving waves- so the discovered waves are created by the planets motions energies and not by any gravitational field – also I prove the sun doesn't produce a gravitational field which proves my theory tells the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies

(iii)

The previous analysis shows the sun rays are created from the gravitational waves motions and the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies- that explains how the sun can be a phenomenon created by the planets motions energies

(iv)

The major hypothesis elementary proves

The Sun corona temperature is 5 million Kelvin but the sun surface is 5800 Kelvin because the energy is NOT produced by the sun body but out of the sun body- the energy is coming from the planets motions energies- that's why the energy out of the sun is greater the energy inside the sun

Planet velocity analysis proves that the sun is created after all planet creation and motion where no any planet can be created or added to the solar group after the sun creation- this fact is proved by planet velocity analysis discussed by the paper.

The sun velocity 2 km/s (the sun circumference 4.37 million km/ the sun rotation period 25.4 days) this velocity proves the sun is the stationary point in the solar system which is required to create the sun rays –

The sun diameter = Jupiter circumference x π and also

(the sun mass /Jupiter mass)= π x (Jupiter mass/ the Earth Mass) (error 5%) because Jupiter defines The sun creation data with the inner planets

The total solar eclipse geometrical design is found by Jupiter- because Jupiter uses the total solar eclipse to define the sun position in the sky after the sun creation- the total solar eclipse data shows Jupiter creates the whole design

The paper discuses these proves and many others in details

The Major hypothesis Explanation

The major hypothesis depends on 4 hypothesis which are

1st hypothesis

The gravitational waves are produced by the planet motion energy and Not by the gravitational field- Moreover- the sun doesn't produce a gravitational field -Shortly- the planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) and this energy is stored in the space as moving waves – these are the gravitational waves- also the gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system and the wave reflection causes to square the wave velocity

2nd hypothesis

As discussed before

The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion To Produce Its Rays– Because

This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own

3rd hypothesis

The planets Motions use different rates of time – the rate of time depends on the velocities rate – example- Mercury velocity = 1.6 the Earth velocity because of that (One Second Of Mercury Clock = 1.6 Seconds Of The Earth Clock)

4th hypothesis

Neptune motion caused to create relativistic effects in the solar system because

This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own

the new article tells the gravitational waves can move by speed of light-

and the gravitational waves move by speed of light but Neptune caused to decrease the wave speed by 1% and by that the speed be equal 99% of speed of light (=297000 km/s) which caused to created relativistic effects in the solar system- also- Neptune caused to create two wave reflections in the outer planets which one reflection only was enough- means- if Neptune is removed from the solar system the wave reflections in the outer planets will be one reflection only and not two reflections

NOTICE

In following I provide the explanations and proves for the four hypothesis- BUT- Before – I have to provide refutations for 15 theories in the modern physics book-

I want to say-

NOT only – The sun nuclear fusion theory is wrong –BUT – also there are 15 other theories are wrong in the modern physics book-I put them in the preface before the four hypotheses explanation

The Paper 4 Branch Hypotheses Proves Discussion

Preface– Refutations Of 15 Physics Theories

I provide refutations for 15 theories in the modern physics book which are

The Physicist Vision Contradicts The Nature System

The physicist supposes Planet moves and doesn't produce motion energy

Einstein is wrong (Space Has Mechanical Features)

Einstein is wrong (The Sun Doesn't Produce A Gravitational Field)

Newton Is Wrong (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity)

Newton Is Wrong (Mass Gravity Can NOT Cause Any Motion)

The physics book is wrong (The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies)

The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion To Produce Its Rays

The Big Bang Theory is Wrong (No Random Creation)

Newton is wrong (Planet Motion Does Not Depend On Its Mass)

Einstein is wrong (The original speed of light is 1.16 million km per second)

Giant- Impact Hypothesis is wrong (Mars Caused The Moon Creation)

Tidal Locking Theory Is Wrong

Lorentz Transformation Are Correct

Newton Is wrong (The gravitation equation is wrong)

First Critic The Physicist Vision Contradicts The Nature System

I study the solar system Geometry since long years- and- I have found the physicist and astronomer can't understand the solar system designer vision– in fact their vision contradict the Nature designer vision- let's prove that in following

The Physicist Vision

The physicist supposes that there's (a unit of building)- by that- the physicist sees the mass (for example) as wall and this wall is consisted of bricks (small similar units) and for that the physicist searched for this (unit) because it's the (unit) by which the wall is building (the mass is building)– this is the physicist thinking direction- he believed there's a small unit by which the great building is built

For that the physicist searched and found the particle and then the particle is divided into Molecules then the Molecule is divided into atoms and the atom is divided into nucleus and electron moves around and the nucleus is divided into proton and Neutron- and the proton is divided into quarks …etc

The physicist searches for the building unit- the unit by which the building is built – or the unit by which the mass is built – for that the physicist divides (any thing) to see its contents till reach to the unit which can be used as the building unit.

The Nature System Vision

The Nature designer aims to create integration- as the marriage – male and female- the relationship will cause to give birth for a child

INTEGRATION this is the word inside the designer Mind

No building unit- the marriage answers- because in marriage both (male and female) are required and no one of them better than the other – both work together and give equal effects on the same one process and give together one result- I explain the idea by the marriage because it's easy to understand- I want to put the word (Integration) as the basic concept in the designer mind.

AND

I want to explain how the physicist causes fatal error for the research method

While the physicist divides the elements one after one (from matter to particle to molecule to atom to proton to quarks …etc) this division from out into inner till reach to very small unit which he considered the building unit – that causes to destroy the geometrical design of the integration process

Let's return to the marriage- the marriage requires two players (male and female)- they have different bodies and the process give birth for children- Suppose we remove one player what would happen? (where can we find a woman pregnant by herself?)

I want to say- the division from (matter to particle to molecule to atom to proton to quarks …etc) destroys the general geometrical design which uses the integration process- let's give other examples

Example No. (1)

Einstein told us (He can't find slightest meaning for the word SPACE) by that he can't define (what's the space) and also he found the space has no mechanical features because no definition causes these features – this is the physicist vision - Let's see the designer vision

Planet moves and its motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) and where's the energy? the planet can't store its motion energy inside its body because this energy would raise the planet temperature and no planet temperature is raised by its motion- so- where's the planet motion energy? logically we suppose that- the energy is stored in the space in waves form- means- the planet moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space (as the fish swims in the sea and its motion creates waves in the sea water) similar to that the planet motion produces energy and this energy creates waves in the space- by that we can define the space and conclude the space nature and features- simply we conclude the space has mechanical features because the energy is stored in the space as moving waves- the gravitational waves prove the space has motion- why we can solve the question which Einstein couldn't solve? Because he supposed the planet is independent from the space- the integration concept is not known by him

Notice

The waves are produced by the planet motion energy are the gravitational waves, the paper first hypothesis proves these waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field also the hypothesis proves the Sun doesn't produce a gravitational field.

More examples are provided after the hypotheses explanations

Second Critic The physicist supposes Planet moves and doesn't produce motion energy

Planet motion energy analysis can refute many basic theories in the physics book as we will see in this discussion- for that- the physicist supposed planet motion doesn't produce energy- while- the mechanics basic law tells us (Any moving body produces energy =1/2 mv^2)-but- the physicist never answered the question (where's Planet motion energy?)-because- planet motion energy analysis proves the space has mechanical features and proves Mass gravity can NOT cause any motion and also proves the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field (even if found)- also it proves the sun is NOT doing nuclear fusion to produce its rays-

Here I explain why the physicist never answer the question (where's planet motion energy?)- the following critic uses planet motion energy analysis to prove that the space has mechanical features

Third Critic Einstein is wrong (Space Has Mechanical Features)

Any moving body produces energy (1/2 mv^2) – for that-

Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) but where's this energy? the planet can't store its motion energy inside its body because this energy would raise the planet temperature and no planet temperature is raised by its motion- so- where's the planet motion energy? logically we suppose that- the energy is stored in the space in waves form- means- the planet moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space (as the fish swims in the sea and its motion creates waves in the sea water) similar to that the planet motion produces energy and this energy creates waves in the space- by that we can define the space and conclude the space nature and features- simply we conclude the space has mechanical features because the energy is stored in the space as moving waves- the gravitational waves prove the space has motion- by that- we are sure that the space has mechanical features

Notice – these waves are the gravitational waves

Fourth Critic Einstein is wrong (The Sun Doesn't Produce A Gravitational Field)

The Refutation Of The Sun Gravitational Field

The Sun Doesn't Produce A Gravitational Field Nor Has Massive Gravity – let's prove that in following

(i)

The sun rotation period is (25.4 days– at equator) and (34.4 days – at pole) that shows the sun has no massive gravity nor even ordinary gravity equal any planet gravity otherwise the sun would rotate around its axis in one period of time-

(ii)

No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity–Newton is wrong- because- the planet moves by the force caused its creation- means- the planet creation and motion is done by one force only- because- if two forces have effects on the same one planet this planet would be broken- now- suppose the planet is created (by any force) and the sun gravity attracted this planet and forced it to revolve around the sun by the sun mass massive gravity (as Newton imagined) that would force the planet to move against its inner structure and will cause this planet to be broken- this is similar to a human is forced to walk on his hands in place of his legs and when this human refuses to do that (they told him we can force you by our power) for that this human walk on his hands forcedly and later this human is dead by this motion- shortly- the planet is NOT broken by its motion because the planet creation force is the force causes this planet motion- it's one force caused the planet creation and motion-

Newton mistake is that he didn't know how the planet is created and by that he didn't realize that planet creation and motion are done together by the same one source- simply- the sun didn't cause to create any planet and for that the sun doesn't cause any planet to move- this analysis shows logical base but left us with puzzles to know (by what rule the planet moves?) and (Why is the sun found in the solar system if it doesn't cause the planets motions?) these questions are answered in the paper abstract and discussions.

(iii)

The mass gravity force can NOT cause any motion- again Newton is wrong- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses- (the Earth and the moon are bond by the mass gravity)- by that they are similar to a lorry and its trailer – if the lorry moves the trailer will move with the lorry- but the mass gravity can NOT cause any motion- why? suppose the moon moves by the Erath gravity force- the moon moves and produces energy (1/2mv^2) and we have to ask from what source this energy will be provided?- from the mass itself- means if the Earth causes the moon to move the Earth and the moon masses should be decreased by the motion energy- this is a wrong definition for the mass gravity- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses (The Earth and the moon) if some outer force causes the Earth to move the moon will move with the Earth and in this case the outer force will provide the motion energy for the Earth and the moon-

(iv)

The planets order contradicts Newton gravitation equation- where- the gravitation equation tells (greater mass necessitates shorter distance)- clearly- Jupiter the greatest mass is not the most near planet to the sun- means- the planets order contradicts the equation- when we asked the physicist told us this problem is done by (the initial conditions)- all these are nonsense clearly- planet orbital distance does NOT depend on the sun mass nor on the planet mass- planet orbital distance depends on the neighbor planet orbital distance – my equation proves this fact- let's see it

Planet orbital distance equation (my 1st equation)

d^2= 4do (d-do) where d= planet orbital distance and do= its neighbor distance

Example (1) Venus orbital distance (108.2)^2 = 4 x 57.9 x (50.3)

d= 108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance

d0= 57.9 million km = Mercury Orbital Distance

50.3million km=The Distance Between Venus And Mercury Venus Depends On Mercury

Example (2) Saturn orbital distance (1433)^2= 4 x 778.6 x 655

d= 1433 million km = Saturn Orbital Distance

d0= 778.6 million km = Jupiter Orbital Distance

655million km=The Distance Between Saturn And Jupiter Saturn Depends On Jupiter

All planets orbital distances are defined based on their previous neighbor planets orbital distances- the equation is correct perfectly and all planets orbital distances are defined by it- my paper tests and discusses this equation

Shortly- planet mass has no any effect on this planet orbital distance definition.

Notice

Planet orbital distance definition depends on its neighbor orbital distance this fact is proved by many other different methods my equation is one method only of them, all these methods don't use any planet mass- all planets orbits are defined based on their neighbor orbits- (Please note- Newton gravitation equation is wrong- I don't critic it by many critics to short the discussion- but- the fact is that- the light beam created all planets orbits before any planet creation- the light created each planet orbit depends on its neighbor orbit- I prove this fact in the paper discussion- logically this fact kills the gravitation equation because the orbit is created before the planet creation)

Notice -Newton is so far from the truth- let's give one more example- Newton told us planet moves by the sun mass gravity- the fact is that- the Sun itself is created by the planets motions energies- that's why Newton ideas are not interesting for discussion because his ideas are imaginary have no part of truth-

(v)

Also-Newton told-planet motion depends on its mass- means-planet velocity depends on its mass- this also is imaginary idea- I define planet velocity in the paper abstract- planet velocity is defined by many rules all of them don't use any planet mass- at all Planet mass has no rule in this planet velocity definition.

Fifth Critic Newton Is Wrong (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity)

This critic is written in the previous one (Fourth Critic)

Sixth Critic Newton Is Wrong (Mass Gravity Can NOT Cause Any Motion)

Also this critic is written in the previous one (Fourth Critic)

Seventh Critic The physics book is wrong (The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies)

(1)

Planet Motion Energy Analysis - Let's remember planet motion energy analysis

Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2), where's Planet motion energy? the planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body because it would raise its temperature and No planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically- the planet motion energy is stored in the space in waves form- means- Planet motion energy creates waves in the space- the planet motion in the space is similar to a fish swimming in the sea- as the fish swimming creates waves in the water the planet motion energy creates waves in the space- let's see this picture clearly- the fish swims because it hits the water by its body and that creates waves in the water- we conclude, the water waves move by a velocity equal the fish velocity because of the reaction force- similar to that- Planet moves in the space and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity equal the planet velocity- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by equal velocity (47.4 km/s)- based on this idea- All planets move and their motions energies create waves in the space where each wave moves by velocity equal its planet velocity

(2)

These Waves Are The Gravitational Waves (My Hypothesis)

Means- the waves are produced by the planets motions energies- these waves are the gravitational waves- it's my paper hypothesis- the gravitational waves are not produced by the gravitational field (moreover the sun doesn't produce a gravitational field) instead the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies

AND

Note- The moon and the Earth revolve around the sun together for that the moon velocity is considered equal the Earth velocity relative to (the sun) –

The Conclusion

The Planet Motion Energy Creates Waves In The Space

Means - The Space Must Have Moving Waves -

Now -the scientists had discovered waves in the space- And- they considered these waves are produced by The Sun Gravitational Field – BUT Why?

The planet motion energy analysis proves the waves must be produced by the planets motions energies- and I have refuted the sun gravitational field theory- by that- the gravitational waves must be produced by the planets motions energies

(3)

These Waves Reflections Effect and Proves

The paper proves that, the gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system three times and these reflections cause effects on the planets data and motion- the first branch hypothesis provides powerful proves for this fact which proves the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by any gravitational field (even if found)

Eighth Critic The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion To Produce Its Rays

This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own

This new article tells the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam- I claim the sun rays are produced based on this method by the gravitational waves motions and not by the sun nuclear fusion process- Means- the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to produce its rays- this is the paper main hypothesis – also I claim no star rays is created by any nuclear fusion process- but all stars rays are created by the gravitational waves motions as our sun

The paper all discussions and proves prove this hypothesis basically

Ninth Critic The Big Bang Theory is Wrong (Planet Diameter Is Created Based On A Mathematical Equation- No Random Creation)

The big bang theory tells- Planet is created by random process- and we asked (what does mean "By Random Process"?) the theory tells

Jupiter– for example- is created by random process-means- Jupiter diameter and mass are created with some unknown values for us- and during the history Jupiter is collided many times and these collisions changed Jupiter diameter and mass-

As a result the current value of Jupiter diameter (142984 km) is a value found by random because of the historical events

Based on these ideas- the planets diameters are found without any rule or geometrical reason- means

While we know all planets diameters correctly- the astronomer couldn't use these diameters to discover the geometrical rule behind these diameters creation- the theory told No geometrical rule or reason-simply–Just Random process- the theory is wrong-

In following I provide my planet diameter equation to prove planet diameter is created based on a mathematical equation and a geometrical reason

My Planet Diameter Equation (v1/v2)= (s/r)= I

v = Planet Velocity

r = Planet Diameter

I= Planet Orbital Inclination

s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period

v2, s, r and I are belonged to one planet and v1 is belonged to another planet

The planet (v1) is defined by test the minimum error

Earth Equation uses Neptune velocity

Mars Equation uses Pluto velocity

Jupiter Equation uses the Earth moon velocity

Saturn Equation uses Mars velocity

Uranus Equation uses Neptune velocity (As Earth)

Neptune Equation uses Saturn velocity

Pluto Equation uses the Earth moon velocity (As Jupiter)

Example Neptune Equation (89143 /49528) = 9.7/ 5.4 =1.8

89143 = Neptune rotation periods number in Neptune orbital period

49528 km = Neptune diameter

9.7 km/s = Saturn velocity and

5.4 km/s = Neptune velocity

1.8 degrees= Neptune Orbital Inclination

59800 days = Neptune orbital period (and Neptune rotation period =16.1 hours)

The Equation Concept (A Summary) Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance –otherwise- this planet would be broken by its motion- BUT- the designer can't create a function has only 2 variables (Planet diameter and its orbital distance)- because– If this planet changes its orbital distance its diameter would be broken also because the diameter is a direct function in the orbital distance without any other variables -As A Result- the designer created planet diameter as a function in this planet rotation period and the planet rotation period is created as a function in this planet velocity and the planet velocity is created as a function in this planet orbital distance- by that- the function between Planet diameter and its orbital distance is created but also it contains many variables (rotation period, orbital period and velocity)- by that- if the Planet changes its orbital distance- this planet orbital period, and velocity and rotation period would be changed but its diameter will be saved

NOTICE

The big bang theory is wrong in principle because it supposes the changes in the planet diameter (or mass) doesn't change this planet motion-

this is the main problem behind- and to see the picture more clear- let's give example

The physics book has theory explains the Earth motion- Now- the Earth diameter is 12756 km and we have to ask (if the Earth diameter be 18000 km) what are the changes in the Earth motion would be happened?

Generally- Nothing would be happened because the theory doesn't take into account the Earth diameter at all – means (whatsoever the Earth diameter be the theory will be the same) that explains the big bang wring ideas are not limited to the big bang theory but it extends in the physicist ideas and theories-

Tenth Critic Newton is wrong (Planet Motion Does Not Depend On Its Mass)

Planet velocity analysis shows planet velocity is defined by many rules No one of them is related to this planet mass- at all Planet mass is not mentioned in this planet velocity definition proves the mass has no any role in Planet velocity definition– please read Planet velocity definition in point no. (**)

Eleventh Critic Einstein is wrong (The Original Speed Of Light Is 1.16 Million Km Per Second)

The solar system is created from one light beam energy- means- the solar planets matters and their distances are created from one energy and this one energy is provided by one light beam and this light beam moves by speed = 1.16 million km per second

The light (its speed 1.16 million km per second) built the solar system starting from Mercury orbit toward Pluto orbit- the light created the planets orbits before any planet creation- means- all orbits are created before any planet creation- the orbits are created based on each another (this fact is proved by my equation for planet orbital distance) after the light created all orbits and reach to Pluto orbit- the light energy is consumed in the space creation- and the rest energy is found in one light beam its speed is (300000 km/s = the known speed of light)- we understand this is one light beam its speed was 1.16 million km per second before the space creation (In Mercury Orbit) and its speed becomes 300000 km/s after the space creation (in Pluto orbit) as result for the energy consumption in the space creation-

In Pluto orbit - the light could Not move any further to build any more orbits because any additional space creation will consume more energy and that will decrease the light speed to be less than 300000 km/s (the known speed of light) – and – No known light moves by speed less than 300000 km/s – means- the light had no energy to move any further after Pluto orbit- for that- the light returns to its origin point (Mercury orbit) for that the light is reflected with speed (300000 km/s) from Pluto orbit to Mercury orbit passing through the built orbits– no energy is required in this motion for that the light beam moves with speed of light (300000 km/s) till Mercury orbit.

The paper provides many powerful proves for this fact- here I refer to 3 proves only

(1st Proof)

Planet Velocity Analysis proves the speed 1.16 million km per second

Data

322 = 47.4 km/s (Mercury velocities) x 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocities)

322 = 35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 2

322 = 29.8 km/s (the Earth velocity) x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocities) x 2

322 = 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity) x 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity)

322 = (17.9 km/s)^2 (Ceres velocity) (Max error 2%)

Discussion

This is one rule used to define planet velocity- we know this rule (v1v2 = constant =322) – other rules are discussed in planet velocity definition- here we ask only

Why the constant is 322?? Because 1160000 seconds = 3600 x 322 hours

Means- the light moves 1.16 million km but we see it as 1160000 seconds and based on this period the constant 322 hours is defined and based on this constant the planets velocities are defined- means- the planets velocities are defined as functions in the speed 1.16 million km per second

(2nd Proof)

The planets orbital circumferences total is defined by light speed 1.16 million km per second- let's prove that

100733 million km = 86400 seconds x 1160000 km/s

100733 million km = The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total

86400 seconds = The solar day

Means- light its speed 1.16 million km per second passes in a solar day a distance = 100733 million km = The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total

The planets data analysis proves that the solar day is the major period of time in the solar system- that because- all planets orbits are defined based on it- the paper proves this fact strongly

(3rd Proof)

The planets orbits and orbital distances are created from the energy of the light beam its speed is 1.16 million km per second- for that- this speed is registered in the distances data – let's prove that in following

Example

778.6 million km (Jupiter orbital distance) = 1160000 km/s x 671 seconds

721 million km (Jupiter Mercury distance) = 1160000 km/s x 629 seconds

Where

671 million km = Jupiter Venus Distance

629 million km = Jupiter Earth Distance

This example tells that

The light (its speed 1.16 million km per second) created the distances based on each other- means

The light uses 671 million km (Jupiter Venus Distance) as a period of time 671 seconds to pass the distance 778.6 million km (Jupiter Orbital Distance)

Also -the light uses 629 million km (Jupiter Earth Distance) as a period of time 629 seconds to pass the distance 721 million km (Jupiter Mercury Distance)

By this method the light (1.16 million km per second) creates the distances based on each other- the previous data is example for so many other distances let's see them in following

(778.6 / 671)= (721/629) = (629/551)= (2x551/940)= (4900/4188) = (5906/5127)= (5127/4437) = (4345/3717)= 1.16

Where

778.6 million km = Jupiter Orbital Distance

721 million km = Jupiter Mercury Distance

671 million km = Jupiter Venus Distance

629 million km = Jupiter Earth Distance

551 million km = Jupiter Mars Distance

940 million km = Earth Orbital Circumference

4188 million km = 2 x 2094 million km (Jupiter Uranus Distance)

4900 million km = Jupiter Orbital Circumference

5906 million km = Pluto Orbital Distance

5127 million km = Pluto Jupiter Distance

4437 million km = Mercury Neptune Distance

4345 million km = The Earth Neptune Distance

3717 million km = Jupiter Neptune Distance

The paper provides so many other powerful proves for the speed 1.16 million km

Notice

(1.16/0.3) x 2π = 24.3

The equation tells, because the solar system is created by light beam its speed 1.16million km per second with its other speed 300000 km/s

For that - the space is created in curved lines (2π) and the time is created based on the solar day (24 hours)- that explains why the planets orbital circumferences total depends on the solar day period

Twelfth Critic Giant- Impact Hypothesis is wrong (Mars Caused The Moon Creation)

Mars Is The Planet Caused The Earth Moon Creation

Let's prove that in following

Mars Original Orbit Was Between Mercury And Venus with orbital distance = 84 million km

The order (Mercury– Mars – Venus – Earth) shows correct order in planets diameters, and orbital distances (and masses)

BUT – Mars had migrated from its original orbit (between Mercury and Venus) to its current one (227.9 million km) and Mars had collided with Venus and then with the Earth in its migration motion – and Mars itself has caused the Earth moon creation.

My Theory (Mars Migration Theory) answers many left questions by Giant-Impact Hypothesis – for example -

Why Does Venus Have No Moon?

Mars had migrated from its original orbit (between Mercury and Venus) – and moved to its current orbit (227.9 million km) – BUT- Mars had moved under force and push – and then Mars had collided with Venus –and Mars had pushed ALL DEBRIS with it in its Motion Direction because of its strong motion

Venus had found No Debris around and for that Venus couldn't create its moon

But– the Earth gravity is greater than Venus' and the debris lost some of their momentum for that the Earth could attracted some debris and created its moon.

Mars has 2 moons and this fact supports my theory because Mars with small mass could attract two moons because the debris were around it while Venus has greater mass but couldn't create its moon because the debris are moved with Mars motion.

The rest debris are attracted by Jupiter gravity and created the asteroid belt

My paper provides many powerful proves for Mars Migration Theory

Thirteenth Critic Tidal Locking Theory Is Wrong

The moon orbital period = the moon rotation period =27.3 days Not because of any tidal locking – this theory is wrong

The moon periods equality is found necessary to be used by Planet Diameter Equation

In fact- my planet diameter equation can work by depending on one planet its rotation period = its orbital period- this feature was Venus feature- means- in ancient Venus orbital period was equal Venus rotation period =243 solar days and my planet diameter equation depended on Venus to defines each planet diameter

But Neptune caused to create relativistic effects in the solar system- the relativistic effects caused to cerate Lorentz length contraction effect with the rate 7.1 and the solar system uses this rate by geometrical modification as (1+ 7.1/100) = 1.0725

Shortly- Venus orbital period (as many other planets data) is effected by the rate 1.0725 and so Venus orbital period is decreased from 243 days to be 224.7 days

Because Venus orbital period (224.7 days) becomes different from Venus rotation period (243 days) that caused great problem for planet diameter equation and put all planets diameters in serious risk –

For that-Venus created an effect on the Moon motion and caused the moon rotation period to be equal the moon orbital period =27.3days and by that my planet diameter equation can work normally again by using the moon motion in place of Venus motion

Shortly –No tidal locking is used to make the moon rotation period to be = the moon orbital period

Fourteenth Critic Lorentz Transformation Are Correct

Lorentz transportation tells us

If a particle moves by high speed motion (near to speed of light), this particle length would be contracted and its mass would be increased and its time would be dilated

BUT -

Many physics Books tell the following

(NO Real Change Is Done For Any Particle Data Moves By High Speed Motion But All Changes Are Illusions Of Measurements)- means-

While a particle is moving by high speed motion and the experiments results show contraction in its length and increasing in its mass and dilation in its time – these changes in measurements are just illusions and the particle itself has no change in any data

Tenth of books tell this meaning clearly and with confirmation and the physicist killed Lorentz work and made Lorentz transformation measures illusions and not facts- regardless the empirical proves-

I stand in front of the books and can't realize what's happening –I refuse these books idea because

The Physics Is The Measurements Science And What's Measured Is The Fact

If no real changes are done how the problem of Michelson and Morelly experiment is solved?- also- we can't understand why the synchronous events in one frame can't be synchronous in another (as Einstein stated) where no change is found for any data- the distances are Not contracted nor the time is dilated nor the mass is increased why the events can NOT be synchronous in any frame?

If the particle own data are measured correctly while it moves by my motion velocity and these measurements are suffered from illusions because the particle moves by high velocity motion relative to my motion velocity that means (I'm the universe reference point)

We notice- Lorentz length contraction equation can't distinguish between particle length and a distance, both can be contracted by the same one equation- that supports my theory tells (Matter And Space Are Created From The Same Energy)– If the space is similar to the sea of water the matter will be similar to a whirlpool (or vortex) on the sea page- both matter and space are created from the same one energy- that gives chance to change the matter dimensions by its motion

My planet diameter equation proves Planet diameter is created depending on its velocity- means- for example– Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s- this fact is proved by my Equation strongly - that tells the motion has effect on the matter dimensions and data definition which supports the same meaning of Lorentz transformation.

In fact- my planet diameter equation is the main motive behind this fighting because the equation proves strongly Planet diameter is created based on its velocity- the velocity is defined before creation- the problem here is in the definition of matter- the wrong definition of matter caused this problem while my planet diameter equation proves that the planet diameter is defined based on its velocity

Please read the paper definitions which change the matter definition and prove the matter data is created depending on its motion

Fifteenth Critic Newton Is Wrong (The Gravitation Equation Is Wrong)

What's the first mistake in the physics book? (The Gravitation Equation)

The main problem here is that – the gravitation equation contradicts the planets order- the equation tells (more mass necessitates Shorter distance) but the planets are ordered in opposite direction – for example- (Mercury- Venus – Earth) this order tells more mass necessitates Longer distance

The equation clearly contradicts the planets order-( Jupiter the greatest mass is not the first planet)

But- the physicist doesn't see this problem and invented ideas to cover this contradiction- for that- the physicist told us (Planet Initial Condition Prevents The Planet To Follow The Gravitation Equation Rule)- that tells the gravitation equation lost all support from the planets data and even it contradicts the planets order but the physicist knows the secret of this contradiction and we should trust this contradiction is not real one

This was a sad day in the human history- because we needed ideas can explain the planets motions and data but the physicist ideas removed even the planets data which is the only facts we have- and the physicist gave us lies and imaginary pictures that was the starting of the errors occupied the physics book since long time

Now – let's ask – How does planet define its orbital distance? Planet defines its orbit based on its neighbor orbit (planet mass has no relationship)- let's see the proof

My Planet Orbital Distance Equation d^2=4 d0 (d- d0)

d = A Planet Orbital Distance AND d0= Its Direct Previous Neighbor Planet Orbital Distance

VENUS ORBIT (108.2)^2 = 4 x 57.9 x (50.3)

d= 108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance

d0= 57.9 million km =Mercury Orbital Distance

50.3 million km = The Distance Between Venus And Mercury

Venus Depends On Mercury

SATURN ORBIT (1433.5)^2 = 4 x 778.6 x (1433.5- 778.6)

d= 1433.5 million km =Saturn Orbital Distance

d0= 778.6 million km =Jupiter Orbital Distance

Saturn depends on Jupiter

URANUS ORBIT (2872.5)^2 = 4 x 1433.5 x (2872.5- 1433.5)

d= 2872.5 million km = Uranus Orbital Distance

d0= 1433.5 million km = Saturn Orbital Distance

Uranus depends on Saturn

The Paper Tests My Equation With All Planets Orbital Distances And Discusses The Equation Concept-

Please Note- light created the space in orbits depending on each other before any planet creation- means- the planets orbits are created before any planet creation and by that planet mass has no relationship with its orbit definition-

In fact- the planets orbits are created by light motion and that is proved by different powerful planets data –my planet orbital distance equation is one method only and there are many other methods prove the orbits are created based on each other without any effect of any planet mass- shortly- the basic idea is wrong

The paper provides these different methods and proves the planets orbits are created by light motion before any planet creation

PAPER FIRST HYPOTHESIS

Paper first hypothesis

The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field (Moreover the sun is not producing a gravitational field) and

The gravitational waves are reflected three times in the solar system (from Pluto and Neptune to Saturn) and (From Uranus to Jupiter) and (from Venus to Mars) –

The gravitational waves reflection causes changes in the planets data- and these changes are repeated with each reflection- means- these changes are found by rules because it's repeated with each reflection clearly- that shows the planets use similar behaviors to create their data which proves one reason causes to create all this data

Also- the wave energy reflection causes to square the wave velocity – the velocity square is the most important feature of the energy reflection because it enables the waves to move by speed of light- that explains how the gravitational waves can move by speed of light in the solar system- the motion by speed of light is produced only by the wave energy reflection (and without the reflection this motion can't be done)

Paper 1st hypothesis (The objective of the hypothesis)

I prove that the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and these waves are reflected in the solar system three time and the reflection of the wave energy causes to square the wave velocity (the velocity squaring is the important feature I prove in the paper because the light beam is reflected but its speed is NOT squared and that means the wave velocity squaring is feature of the space) and it's very important to prove the wave velocity is squared by the reflection because this process enables the waves to move by speed of light and that explains how the gravitational waves can move by speed of light – as this new article states

This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own

The article tells, the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam- here I explain how the gravitational waves can move by speed of light (please note the article still believes the gravitational waves are produced by the gravitational field – I refuse this idea – the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies but the article states that the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam and I accept this idea and I explain and prove how the gravitational waves can move by speed of light)

Paper 1st hypothesis Proof (The Proving Method)

I compare between the planets data in the three reflections of the wave- I put the planets data in comparison to each other for each reflection to prove the planets use similar behaviors to define their data and this similar behavior proves one force (or one reason) is found behind- and this one reason is the wave energy reflection which causes to create all this data –

The wave energy reflection effect on the solar system design (A Summary)

The reflections cause defined changes in the planets data – and

The most important change is (the wave velocity square) – and this velocity squaring is very important because it enable the gravitational waves to move by speed of light – the motion by speed of light is very effective on the solar system design because it defines the planets distribution between the sun and Pluto– this fact is explained in point no. (**)

Paper 1st hypothesis Explanation and Proof Discussion

The explanation is discussed in two parts

1ST PART

I- Preface

II- The Comparison

III- The explanation of the wave energy reflection effect on the solar system design

2nd PART

The Gravitational Waves Reflection Detailed Discussion

(Paper 1st hypothesis Explanation) 1ST PART

I- Preface

(1)

Planet Motion Energy Analysis

Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2), where's Planet motion energy? the planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body because it would raise its temperature and No planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically- the planet motion energy is stored in the space in waves form- means- Planet motion energy creates waves in the space- the planet motion in the space is similar to a fish swimming in the sea- as the fish swimming creates waves in the water the planet motion energy creates waves in the space- let's see this picture clearly- the fish swims because it hits the water by its body and that creates waves in the water- we conclude, the water waves move by a velocity equal the fish velocity because of the reaction force- similar to that- Planet moves in the space and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity equal the planet velocity- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by equal velocity (47.4 km/s)- based on this idea- All planets move and their motions energies create waves in the space where each wave moves by velocity equal its planet velocity

(2)

These Waves Are The Gravitational Waves (My Hypothesis)

Mans- the waves are produced by the planets motions energies- these waves are the gravitational waves- it's my paper 1st hypothesis- the gravitational waves are not produced by the gravitational field (moreover the sun doesn't produce a gravitational field) instead the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies

AND

Note- The moon and the Earth revolve around the sun together for that the moon velocity is considered equal the Earth velocity relative to (the sun) –

The 1st Conclusion

The Planet Motion Energy Creates Waves In The Space

Means - The Space Must Have Moving Waves -

Now -the scientists had discovered waves in the space- And- they considered these waves are produced by The Sun Gravitational Field – BUT Why?

The planet motion energy analysis proves the waves must be produced by the planets motions energies- Now let's refute the sun gravitational field theory- the refutation gives support for the conclusion – the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and NOT by the gravitational field because there's NO Gravitational field.

(3)

The Refutation Of The Sun Gravitational Field

The Sun Doesn't Produce A Gravitational Field Nor Has Massive Gravity – let's prove that in following

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

(iv)

Planet orbital distance equation (my 1st equation)

d^2= 4do (d-do) where d= planet orbital distance and do= its neighbor distance

Example (1) Venus orbital distance (108.2)^2 = 4 x 57.9 x (50.3)

d= 108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance

d0= 57.9 million km = Mercury Orbital Distance

50.3million km=The Distance Between Venus And Mercury Venus Depends On Mercury

Example (2) Saturn orbital distance (1433)^2= 4 x 778.6 x 655

d= 1433 million km = Saturn Orbital Distance

d0= 778.6 million km = Jupiter Orbital Distance

655million km=The Distance Between Saturn And Jupiter Saturn Depends On Jupiter

Shortly- planet mass has no any effect on this planet orbital distance definition.

Notice

(v)

The 2nd Conclusion

The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Sun Gravitational Field- Also-There's No Gravitational Field At All

(4)

The Wave Reflection Trajectory

Let's remember what we know till now

(a)

Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) and this energy creates waves in the space and each wave moves by its planet velocity- these waves move toward Pluto (perpendicular on the revolution direction) and in Pluto orbit these waves are unified into one unified wave moves by velocity = the planets velocities total = 205.8 km/s

Means- while the planets revolve around the sun in their orbits by their velocities- there's one unified wave revolves around the sun moving by 205.8 km/s and this unified wave revolves around The Sun In Pluto Orbit-this unified wave is The Gravitational Wave

Now- this unified wave is reflected from Pluto to Venus orbit- Means- the unified wave is reflected and sent from Pluto to Neptune to the next planets till reach Venus

The unified wave is reflected three times in the solar system

(from Pluto and Neptune to Saturn) and

(from Uranus and Jupiter) and

(from Venus to Mars)

With each reflection of the wave defined changes are done for the planets data

But let's refer to the general design behind these three reflections in following

(b)

We remember this new article

This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own

The article tells, the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam-

My hypothesis tells (the reflection of energy causes to square the wave velocity)

Let's put the ideas beside one another to see the general design

The gravitational waves can move by speed of light AND can produce a light beam – How?? if the motion is done by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) how can this motion produce a light beam? Because the light beam is produced from the value (C^2 = squared speed of light) – here we see the energy reflection effect- the wave moves by speed of light and when this wave is reflected its velocity is squared and produced the value (C^2 = squared speed of light) from which the light beam is created-

Means

The machine needs one reflection to change the speed from (speed of light C=30000 km/s to the value C^2 =squared speed of light) and by that the light beam is created

Now – let's ask -

How can the wave moves by speed of light?

We remember- the one unified wave (the gravitational wave) moves in Pluto orbit with velocity 205.8 km/s – how can this gravitational wave moves by speed of light?

By another reflection of energy – let's see that in following

300000 km/s = (205.8 km/s)^2 x 7.1

This equation tells

The unified wave (the gravitational wave) moves by 205.8 km/s and it's reflected, the waves reflection causes to square the velocities

(205.8 km/s)^2 = 42683 km/s

Means the gravitational wave after the reflection moves by a velocity 42683 km/s

BUT

If a particle moves by speed (=0.99 C=297000 km/s), this high velocity motion causes to create relativistic effects specially Lorentz length contraction effect with rate 7.1

Means- the distances should be contracted by the rate 7.1

BUT

The waves reflection causes to reflect the geometrical effects and by that the rate (7.1) will cause to increase the length in place of the length contraction- means- the distances will be increased with (7.1) as a result for Lorentz length contraction effect

The velocity 42683 km/s will be 42683 x 7.1 = 300000 km/s (Speed Of Light)

That explains how the gravitational waves move by (205.8 k/s) can move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)

Here we see clearly that

The machine needs one energy reflection only to accelerate the wave velocity from 205.8 km/s to move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)

And

The machine needs one more reflection only to change the wave speed from the speed of light (C=300000 km/s) to (C^2 =squared speed of light) by which the light beam is created

Shortly -the machine needs only two reflections of energy to produce the light beam from the gravitational waves motions

Now – let's ask– Why Are There Three Reflections Of Energy In The Solar System? If The Machine Needs Just Two Reflections Why The Machine Uses Three Reflections?

Because of Neptune negative effect on the solar system motion- Neptune caused to repeat the energy reflection and by that the solar system uses 2 reflections in the outer planets and one reflection in the inner planets- this result is done by Neptune negative effect on the solar system motion – as explained in details in the third hypothesis.

(c)

Please note- the two reflections in the outer planets are done to produce a result of one reflection only and for that the two reflections are complementary one another as we will discuss- shortly- we can say there's one unified reflection of the wave in the outer planets and one single reflection of the wave in the inner planets because the two reflections in the outer planets are complementary each other and produce a result of one reflection only – spite of that- the planets data prove clearly there are three reflections in the solar system- means- while the wave reflections are three they do effect of two reflections only – as we will discuss in details in following

(5)

The Wave Acceleration Process

Now we know the unified wave velocity is 205.8 km/s and this wave is accelerated to move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) by one reflection and then this wave moves by speed of light is accelerated one more time to produce the value (C^2= squared speed of light) by another reflection

But where's this happened? In which planets orbits this is happened?

Shortly

The wave moves by 205.8 km/s in the orbits of Planets (Pluto – Neptune and Uranus) and

The wave velocity is accelerated to move by speed of light in Saturn orbit

Means- Starting from Saturn orbit the unified wave moves by speed of light – the wave speed is speed of light in all orbits from Saturn to Venus

And

Venus reflected the wave to Mars and that causes to accelerate the wave velocity from the speed of light (C=300000 km/s) to (C^2= squared speed of light)- in the moon orbit between Venus and Mars

(6)

Planet Definition

(A)

The physics book defines the planet as (Planet is solid body created independently from the space and the other planets)–if so- how can the gravitational waves reflection have effects on the planets data??

My definition for the planet is

Planet is a geometrical point carried on the moving energy (or Planet is a geometrical point found on a light beam) – let's explain this definition in following

The matter and space both are created from the same one energy- means

The planets matters and their distances both are created from the same one energy- the matter and space move depending on the motion of this energy from which they are created-means- the matter isn't moving by the mass gravity – Newton is wrong- the matter moves by the motion of the energy from which the matter is created-

Based on this idea

The space is similar to the sea of water- and the matter is similar to a whirlpool (vortex) is found on the sea page- the matter creates for itself a geometrical frame (a distinguished form from the space) and moves by a different velocity from the space motion- as the whirlpool (vortex) on the sea page- it's created by the sea water but it has a distinguish form from the sea waves and it moves by a different velocity from the sea waves- this explanation shows how the moving energy can effect on the matter creation data- for example- we have a whirlpool (vortex) its diameter is 2 meters how is this whirlpool created? and why does its diameter equal = 2 meters? The diameter is created as a result for the water motion velocity, pressure, amount and motion angle and many other features of (the moving water)- the moving water creates this whirlpool with diameter 2 meters and as long as the water motion is not changed this diameter will not be changed also-

Let's give another example

The energy motion is similar to the blood motion in a creature body- suppose- we examine now a liver of human - the blood motion causes this liver to work perfectly but if the blood motion is changed that would cause changes for the liver cells and job – suppose the blood have some poison the liver will be dead- suppose the pressure is raised- I want to say- the liver is a piece of body (matter) but it depends on the blood motion and this blood motion defines this liver dimensions and data-

Shortly–the matter is similar to a muscle in a creature- the muscle may be so strong as a rock but it depends on the blood motion (similar to that the matter is found depending on the motion of energy from which this matter is created)

That explains how the gravitational waves reflection have effects on the planets data- still the planet is a solid body and the wave is a wave- the wave can be reflected but the solid body can NOT be reflected spite of that the planets data is reflected one another because the reflected waves have effects on the moving energy by which this planet (solid body) is created-

(B)

We should see the depth of this new definition-

The definition tells us

The matter (planet) is created by energy and the matter moves with this energy- means- this energy is the mother of this matter- this energy created the matter and caused this matter motion-BUT- this definition tells- the matter motion is defined before the matter creation- means- Planet motion is defined before this planet creation- How can that be possible? Because –

The energy is found alone in motion (the sea water was in motion) and the energy created the matter and this matter dimensions and data is defined based on the energy motion features (as discussed before- the whirlpool "vortex" is created with diameter 2 meters and this diameter is defined by the water motion features "velocity- pressure- angle- amount …etc") by that the matter dimensions are defined by the mother energy motion features - AND after the matter creation, the matter moves with the mother energy- by that- the created matter moves the same motion based on which this matter dimensions and data is defined- that explains how the planet motion is defined before the planet creation-

This fact is proved by my planet diameter equation because it proves strongly that the planet diameter is created based on its velocity- means- the equation proves – for example – Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s and Neptune velocity is defined before Neptune diameter- let's remember this equation

My Planet Diameter Equation (v1/v2)= (s/r)= I

v = Planet Velocity

r = Planet Diameter

s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period

I= Planet Orbital Inclination (example, 1.8 degrees be produced as a rate 1.8)

v2, s, r and I are belonged to one planet and v1 is belonged to another planet

The planet (v1) is defined by test the minimum error

Earth Equation uses Neptune velocity

Mars Equation uses Pluto velocity

Jupiter Equation uses the Earth moon velocity

Saturn Equation uses Mars velocity

Uranus Equation uses Neptune velocity (As Earth)

Neptune Equation uses Saturn velocity

Pluto Equation uses the Earth moon velocity (As Jupiter)

Example

Neptune Equation (89143 /49528) = 9.7/ 5.4 =1.8

89143 = Neptune rotation periods number in Neptune orbital period

49528 km = Neptune diameter

9.7 km/s = Saturn velocity

5.4 km/s = Neptune velocity

59800 days = Neptune orbital period (and Neptune rotation period =16.1 hours)

1.8 degrees = Neptune Orbital Inclination

The Equation Concept (A Summary)

Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance –otherwise- this planet would be broken by its motion- BUT- the designer can't create a function has only 2 variables (Planet diameter and its orbital distance)- because– If this planet changes its orbital distance its diameter would be broken also because the diameter is a direct function in the orbital distance without any other variables -As A Result

The designer created the planet diameter as a function in this planet rotation period and the planet rotation period is created as a function in this planet velocity and the planet velocity is created as a function in this planet orbital distance- by that- the function Planet diameter and its orbital distance is created but also it contains many variables (rotation period, orbital period and velocity)- by that- if a Planet changes its orbital distance- this planet orbital period, and velocity and rotation period would be changed but its diameter will be saved-

(C)

The previous explanation helps us to see how the planet is created- also we remember Kepler rule (Planet Orbit Defines Its Velocity)

The orbit is created at first and the orbit defines the motion velocity and the planet diameter is created based on this velocity –means- the space is created before the matter creation- Shortly- The planet orbit is created (from the mother energy) before this planet creation and the planet is created later (by this energy motion features) and the planet data is defined based on this motion features and the planet moves after Creation with this mother energy motion- and– in case any planet after creation changes its orbit the planet motion data be changed but its creation data is saved- we should note that the space must be created based on a geometrical design-means- the solar system space (all orbits) is designed based on one geometrical design before any planet creation

(D)

The planet is a geometrical point on the mother energy and moves with it –Or

The planet is a geometrical point on the same light beam and moves with it

That tells

The solar planets are geometrical points found on the same one light beam and move with this light beam motion

By that- the planets are similar to carriages in one train –and the light beam (the mother energy) is the engine of this train- the light moves and causes all planets motions (as the sea water moves and causes all ships motions)

Here we conclude that the planets motions are similar to the chess board motions because it depends on geometrical rules in all details- that's why the analysis is so useful because it can show the geometrical design found by the planets motions integration.

(E)

The planet definition answers the question

If The Gravitational Waves Are Reflected Why This Reflection Have Effects On The Planets Data?

Because the waves reflection causes to define the energy motion direction and by that the planets data is changed and effected by the moving energy through these planets-

The effects on the planets data is very useful because it proves the reflection is a fact as we discussed later

(7)

The Energy Distribution In The Solar System

Now we know

The unified wave (the gravitational wave) moves by 205.8 km/s in the orbits of Pluto, Neptune and Uranus and

The unified wave motion is accelerated to move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) in all planets orbits Starting from Saturn to Venus

And Venus reflected the wave to Mars and by that the speed of light is squared to produce (C^2= squared speed of light) by which the light beam is created

Can The Wave Different Speeds Have Effect On The Solar System Design? YES

The three planets (Pluto, Neptune and Uranus) have great areas because the wave velocity is 205.8 km/s means massive amounts of energy is stored in these orbits as waves move by 205.8 km/s-

But

Starting from Saturn orbit the wave moves by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) that doesn't need great areas because the energy is found in waves move by speed of light that explains why the planets orbits be small orbits (from Saturn to Venus) and even the inner planets have very small orbits because the energy is not stored in the inner planets orbits but the energy is used directly to produce the sun rays- that shows the planets distribution between the Sun and Pluto is related to the wave velocity changes

(8)

Planet Motion Definition

Let's ask

This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own

The article tells, the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam- now we ask- if the gravitational waves move by speed of light- why is it necessary the gravitational waves move by speed of light relative to the sun point of Space? Or let's ask this question by another method

Pluto velocity is 4.7 km/s relative to what? relative to the sun

All Motions In The Solar System Are Done Relative To The Sun – let's explain why

Let's remember how the sun point is created

We understand the space is similar to the sea of water and it's in continuous motion and NO stationary point can be found in it- the sun point of space should be a stationary point- for that the sun point of space creation needed specific procedure

The planets were found before the sun creation and the planets revolve around a point in space (any point in space) the revolution creates two velocities on both sides of the revolution- the two velocities are equal in value opposite in direction- the total be Zero- means- the revolution motion creates a stationary point in the revolution center-

By that the sun point of space is created as a stationary point- and the sun point is the only stationary point in the solar system- for that all motions are done relative to the sun point of space- but let's ask

What does mean Pluto velocity is 4.7 km/s? it means – the sun point of space is a stationary point and its velocity is 1 km/s (Zero approximately)- and that means- the space around the sun has waves move by velocity 1 km/s while Pluto velocity is 4.7 km/s and that means the space around Pluto has waves move by 4.7 km/s and by Pluto motion the waves around the sun moves by 4.7 km/s because of Pluto motion effect

Shortly- the sun is the stationary point in the solar system and all motions are done relative to the sun because it's the minimum velocity in the solar system.

II- The Comparison

The gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system three times

(From Neptune to Saturn) This Is The First Reflection

(From Uranus to Jupiter) This Is The Second Reflection

(From Venus to Mars) This Is The Third Reflection

Here we compare among the data of these planets- the comparison provides 7 groups of data in each group we compare the planets data because I want to prove that the planets use similar behaviors to produce their data – means- this all data is created based on geometrical rules which proves that there's one reason caused to create all this data and this reason is the gravitational waves reflection- In the comparison I start by Venus reflection (the 3rd one) then Uranus reflection (the 2nd one) and Neptune reflection (1st one) because Venus is very simple data and can be understood easily-

The Data Changes

The gravitational waves reflection causes basic changes in the planets data let's refer to these changes in following

What's used as (A) before the reflection will be used as (1/A) after the reflection.

What's used as (a distance) before the reflection will be used as (a period of time) after the reflection

The velocities be squared –the rate (v1/v2) before reflection will be (v1/v2)^2 after the reflection.

The energy direction is changed by the reflection

The players of the rates of time are reflected also –

Notice – the gravitational waves reflection needs three planets –as we have discussed- the 1st reflection (from Neptune to Saturn) and between them Uranus – also the 2nd reflection (from Uranus to Jupiter) and between them Saturn– and also the 3rd reflection (from Venus to Mars) and between them The Earth– that shows three planets are used in each reflection- the middle planet is effected also by the wave reflection as we will see in the data discussion – shortly – No reflection can be done by two neighbors planets -

These changes are done with each reflection for the gravitational waves- the planets data proves this fact as we will see in the comparison of the data and the detailed analysis for the wave reflection (CONT)

Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292

Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty

Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)

Curriculum Vitae https://www.academia.edu/s/b88b0ecb7c

E-mail [email protected], [email protected]

[email protected]

ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous

VK https://vk.com/id696655587

Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges

Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/

Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en

Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile

Pocket https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar

PUBLICATIONS

box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv

Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous

List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous

Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis

#notes #math notes #mathematics notes #pre-algebra #college algebra #algebra notes #imaginary numbers #numbers #number forms #imaginary number values #values of imaginary numbers #college algebra notes #pre-algebra notes #algebra 1 #algebra 2 #algebra I #algebra II

2 notes · View notes

pucksandpower · 2 years ago

Text

Fairytale

Charles Leclerc x Princess of Monaco!Reader

Summary: Charles Leclerc has everything he could ask for (off the track, at least) including a fairytale romance … except no one actually believes that his girlfriend is really his girlfriend

Charles sighs as he walks into the drivers’ lounge, bracing himself for the inevitable teasing. Ever since he had casually mentioned having a girlfriend, and more specifically who the girlfriend in question is, his friends have been merciless.

“Wow, if it isn’t Prince Charles in the flesh! Back from another romantic getaway with his imaginary princess,” Max laughs as he enters.

“Come on mates, lay off,” Charles pleads half-heartedly. He knows it is useless.

“I just don’t get it,” Lando chimes in. “There’s no shame in admitting that you’re single. We’re racing drivers, we don’t exactly always have time for relationships.”

“Maybe his standards are too high,” Pierre suggests. “He’s actually holding out for real royalty or something.”

The others laugh as Charles feels his face grow warm. If only they believed him.

“You know what you need?” Carlos grins. “A nice Spanish girl to set you up with. My sister’s friend Elena is single, I could give you her number.”

Charles rolls his eyes. “I told you, I have a girlfriend. Why is that so hard to believe?”

“Because we’ve never seen her!” Max exclaims. “You talk about her all the time but she never comes to races or appears in photos. She might as well be a unicorn.”

“Maybe she’s just embarrassed to be seen with Charles,” Lando teases.

Charles frowns, stung by Lando’s words. If only they knew the truth. The reality is that his girlfriend is extremely famous in her own right and values the little privacy she has left too much to be seen at races. Her life is already public enough without adding the scrutiny that anyone connected to a Formula 1 driver inevitably receives on top of it. Besides, she has her own royal duties to attend to.

“Come on guys, that’s unfair,” Pierre says gently, noticing Charles’ discomfort. “If Charles says he has a girlfriend, we should believe him.”

“Thank yo—” Charles starts to say with relief. At least someone is on his side.

“Even if she is imaginary,” Pierre adds with a smirk.

Charles groans and puts his head in his hands as the laughter starts up again. He can’t really blame them for not believing him.

You are basically a fairytale princess — beautiful, elegant, and kind. Not to mention an actual member of the royal family. Her Serene Highness Princess Y/N Grace Stephanie Caroline of Monaco is the type of girl people write epic poems and songs about. Charles can hardly believe his luck that you had chosen him.

“Alright, that’s enough,” Daniel interrupts, taking pity on Charles. “Leave the poor man alone.”

“We’re just joking,” Max says defensively. “Charles knows we don’t mean anything by it.”

Charles gives Max a tight smile. “Sure.”

“Tell you what,” Daniel says, clapping Charles on the shoulder. “Bring your mystery girl to a race soon. We’ll all get to meet her and then you can finally prove these jokers wrong.”

Charles sighs. If only it were that simple. You have been tempted to attend races in the past but the scrutiny both of them would come under is just too much. You treasure the privacy your relationship allows. But maybe Daniel is right. Maybe it is time for you to finally meet his friends. After all, you are the love of his life. There is nothing to hide.

“Alright, deal,” Charles says finally. “I’ll ask her.”

The others exchange surprised looks, not expecting him to agree.

“Can’t wait to meet her,” Carlos says with a wink.

Charles rolls his eyes again but smiles. One way or another, he is going to prove to them that his amazing girlfriend isn’t just a figment of his imagination.

***

Charles is still thinking about you when he is suddenly accosted by Silvia, Ferrari’s Head of Communications, after practice.

“Charles! Just who I was looking for,” she says briskly. “I need to discuss something rather important with you.”

Charles suppresses a groan. Conversations with Silvia are never fun. “What’s up?” He asks with forced cheerfulness.

Silvia lowers her voice. “It’s about your relationship status. We feel it would be beneficial if you were seen dating someone … compatible.”

Charles’ eyebrows shoot up. “Compatible?”

“Yes. A model. Or perhaps an actress. Someone who would look good on your arm and boost your image.”

Charles folds his arms defensively. “What’s wrong with my girlfriend?”

Silvia waves a hand impatiently. “Yes yes, this alleged princess you keep mentioning. The problem, Charles, is that no one has seen her. No one knows if she is actually connected to you in any way. So, as far as we are concerned, for all intents and purposes, you are single.”

Charles frowns. This again. “I keep telling you that she’s really my girlfriend. Y/N is just very private.”

“Private women don’t date Formula 1 drivers,” Silvia says bluntly. “If she really was in a relationship with you, she would be here. But since that is clearly a figment of your imagination, we need to take steps.”

Charles feels his blood boil. How dare Silvia insult his relationship with Y/N? Question their connection?

“Here are profiles of suitable options,” Silvia continues, shoving a surprisingly heavy folder at him. Charles doesn’t open it.

“No.”

Silvia blinks. “No?”

“My relationship with Y/N is off limits,” Charles says firmly. “My personal life is exactly that — personal. Not to be exploited for PR.”

“Don’t be foolish,” Silvia snaps. “This is bigger than you. Your image reflects on Ferrari. We need to be able to control it.”

“No. What you need to do is back off,” Charles shoots back.

Silvia’s nostrils flare. Clearly she isn’t used to such defiance. “Charles, be reasonable—”

“I am being reasonable,” Charles interrupts. “I won’t pretend to date someone just because the team wants me to. I’m with Y/N. I don’t care if you believe me or not.”

Silvia shakes her head in disgust. “You’re making a big mistake. Don’t come crying to me when this blows up in your face.”

She storms off, heels clicking angrily against the floor.

Charles takes a deep breath, adrenaline pumping through his veins. He can’t remember the last time he stood up to Silvia like that. It felt good but also nerve-wracking. He knows she won’t let this go easily.

His phone buzzes and his heart leaps when he sees it’s a text from you.

Heard you had a rough day. Wish I could be there to make it better. I love you 💋

Charles smiles, the tension in his shoulders easing. You always knew just what to say and when to say it.

He quickly types back.

I wish you were here too. No matter what anyone says, they can’t change my feelings for you. I love you so much ❤️

He hits send, imagining your smile as you read his text. It doesn’t matter what his team, the media, or even his fellow drivers think. His relationship with you is real and authentic. Someday he’ll find a way for you to be by his side. But for now, your private moments together are enough.

Charles knows staying with you is the right decision, PR be damned. You are his soulmate — the fairytale princess he never expected to find but thanks God every single day that he did. Your love is worth fighting for. And someday, when the time is right, he’ll finally be able to show the world that what you have together is very real.

***

Charles groans as he notices multiple missed calls from his brothers. He has been avoiding their calls lately, knowing they would just tease him mercilessly about his girlfriend. But he knows he can’t dodge them forever.

Taking a deep breath, he calls Arthur back.

“Well, well, well, if it isn’t Prince Charles himself, taking time away from his busy schedule of dating princesses to spare a chat with us commoners,” Arthur says slyly upon answering.

Charles rolls his eyes. “Very funny. What do you want?”

“We just wanted to check in on our brother and see how life with Monegasque royalty is treating you,” Lorenzo chimes in. Charles realizes he must be on speaker.

“Oh yes, Princess Y/N,” Arthur says in an exaggerated swoony voice. “Our brother’s one true love since he was 15 years old and had that giant poster of her plastered on his wall.”

Charles feels his face flush. He knows exactly what poster Arthur is referencing — a stunning photo of you in a ballgown from a high society event years ago. Teenage Charles has ripped it out of a magazine and hung it up reverently in his room, gazing at it longingly.

“Don’t be ridiculous,” he sputters. “I never had a poster.”

“Oh really?” Lorenzo laughs. “I seem to recall you cutting out every picture you could find of her and keeping a little scrapbook.”

Charles cringes internally. Okay, maybe his teenage obsession had been a bit … enthusiastic. But he can’t help that he had recognized you as his dream girl even then.

“Alright, so maybe I had a tiny crush on her,” Charles admits. “But it is not crazy that we ended up together.”

Arthur cackles. “You used to kiss her photos goodnight before going to bed! You were completely obsessed!”

“Remember how he tried to sneak into that royal gala at Salle des Etoiles to see her?” Lorenzo adds. “He was totally insane.”

Charles grimaces at the memory. Okay, not his finest moment.

“Face it Charles, you’ve been in love with the imaginary idea of Princess Y/N since you were in nappies,” Arthur teases. “No shame in admitting she wouldn't even give you the time of day now.”

Charles feels his frustration rising. Why does no one believe him?

“Because your so-called relationship makes no sense!” Lorenzo says, accurately reading his silence. “She’s a literal princess and you’re … you.”

“Gee, thanks,” Charles grumbles. He knows his brothers are just teasing but it still stings.

“Come on, just admit you made the whole thing up to get everyone off your back,” Arthur prods.

Charles sighs loudly. “For the millionth time, what we have is 100 percent real! Just because it seems unlikely doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. I don’t care if none of you believe me, I love her and she loves me.”

His brothers are silent for a moment.

“You alright there?” Arthur asks, his voice softening.

“Yes, I just wish everyone would stop questioning my relationship all the time,” Charles admits. “It hurts.”

“We’re only joking Charles, we don’t mean any harm,” Lorenzo says gently.

“I know,” Charles replies. “Doesn’t make it any easier to hear constantly though.”

“You’re right, we took the teasing too far,” Arthur says. “We’ll lay off from now on.”

Charles smiles slightly. “Thanks. And someday soon I will prove to you that it is real.”

His brothers are silent for a moment.

“Keep telling yourself that,” Arthur finally laughs.

Charles groans and runs a hand through his hair in frustration. Clearly nothing he says would convince his stubborn brothers that his relationship with you was real and not merely a childhood fantasy.

“Alright, well, I should get going,” Charles mumbles, eager to get off the phone.

“Chin up, we’re only teasing,” Lorenzo says lightly. “Have fun with your imaginary princess!”

Arthur and Lorenzo explode into more laughter as Charles quickly hangs up, his face burning. Someday, he will prove to them and everyone else that his amazing girlfriend isn’t just a figment of his imagination. No matter how long it takes.

***

Charles sinks into the familiar couch in his sports psychologist’s office, exhausted after a long day on the simulator and endless teasing from his team.

“Rough day out there?” Dr. Anderson asks kindly, noticing the strain on Charles’ face.

“That’s an understatement,” Charles sighs. “The car is just so slow this year. We keep trying new setups and tweaks but nothing helps. And the strategy is somehow even worse than the pace. It’s like the team wants me to fail.”

Dr. Anderson nods sympathetically. “That must be very frustrating. Tell me more about how it’s impacting you.”

Charles launches into a tirade about the endless issues with the car, the incompetent strategists, and the lack of proper communication from his engineers. Dr. Anderson listens patiently, letting him vent his pent-up anger and disappointment.

After a lengthy rant, Charles finally runs out of steam. “Anyway, it’s just been a terrible season,” he concludes glumly.

“I can certainly understand why you feel that way,” Dr. Anderson says. “It sounds like the team is letting you down in many ways.”

Charles nods, feeling some of the tension leave his shoulders after unloading. It helps to talk about it with someone whose job is not to judge.

“Is there anything else bothering you lately?” Dr. Anderson asks gently. “Any other sources of stress?”

Charles hesitates. He and Dr. Anderson have been working together for years, ever since he joined Ferrari. He knows he can open up to her.

“It’s just … well, besides the team stuff, no one believes me about my girlfriend,” he admits.

Dr. Anderson raises her eyebrows. “I see. Tell me more about that.”

Charles explains the endless teasing from his fellow drivers, the manipulation attempts by the PR team, and the doubtful reactions from his own family. How despite his best efforts, no one seems willing to accept that he is really dating Princess Y/N of Monaco.

“It’s so frustrating!" He bursts out at the end. “I don’t know what else I can do to convince them that we are actually together.”

Dr. Anderson purses her lips, jotting down notes. “I can understand why their doubt would upset you. It must be painful to have your relationship questioned.”

“Exactly!" Charles exclaims, throwing his hands up. “You get it. I knew I could talk to you.”

Dr. Anderson gives him a sympathetic smile.

Charles leaves the appointment feeling much better, confident that his psychologist believes him and is on his side.

As he is exiting, Charles notices Dr. Anderson’s notebook left open on her desk. Before he can stop himself, his eyes scan the page and focus on his name.

He feels his heart sink as he reads.

Charles Leclerc: deflecting from pain of difficult season by creating elaborate fantasy relationship. Fixation on celebrity crush indicates deeper self-esteem issues. Recommend to confront delusion directly in next session.

Charles reels, shock and anger swirling through him. Not even his own psychologist believes him! She thinks he is living in some weird fantasy.

Swallowing the bitter taste in his mouth, Charles straightens his shoulders and walks out. He has never felt more alone and frustrated in his conviction. But he refuses to give up. No matter what anyone says, his love for you is real. And one day, somehow, he will prove it to the world.

***

Charles is back at his family home in Monaco during a rare few days off. He is puttering around the kitchen while his mother cooks dinner.

“Oh, by the way, Y/N is coming over for dinner tonight,” Charles mentions casually. “I want you all to finally meet her.”

Pascale laughs lightly without looking up from the stove. “Of course, sweetie.”

Charles frowns. “I’m serious, maman. She’ll be here in an hour.”

“Mhmm, I’m sure she will,” Pascale replies indulgently. Charles huffs in annoyance.

Just then, his brothers come into the kitchen, freshly showered after playing football outside.

“Hey Charles, how’s life with your imaginary girlfriend?” Lorenzo immediately teases.

“She’s actually coming over for dinner tonight,” Charles says tersely.

Arthur lets out a loud laugh. “Yeah right! Good one.” He grabs a piece of bread from the counter, still chuckling.

Charles throws his hands up in exasperation. “Why does no one ever believe me about her?”

“Boys, that’s enough,” Pascale chides gently. “Let your brother dream.”

Charles opens his mouth to retort but just then, the doorbell rings. His eyes widen.

“I’ll get it!" He yells, dashing for the door. He takes a deep breath before swinging it open to reveal you standing there casually in jeans and a sweater, looking effortlessly gorgeous.

“Surprise!" You laugh, pulling him into a tight hug. Charles melts into your embrace, all his stress and frustration fading away.

“You have no idea how happy I am to see you right now,” he murmurs into your hair.

You pull back to smile at him tenderly. “I’ve been looking forward to this for ages. I want your family to know how much I love you.”

Charles grins and takes your hand, leading your into the kitchen where his stunned family waits.

Pascale’s mouth is hanging open in shock. The piece of bread Arthur is holding falls to the floor with a dull thump.

“Y-your Serene Highness,” Pascale finally manages to stammer out, hastily wiping her hands on a towel. “What an honor, we weren’t expecting you ...”

She shoots an accusatory look at Charles, who throws up his hands defensively. “I told you she was coming!”

Pascale flushes. “Yes, well, I didn’t think … that is … we would have prepared ...”

You step forward gracefully, immediately putting Pascale at ease. “Please, just call me Y/N. I’ve been dying to meet Charles’ family.”

As you effortlessly charm his mother and brothers, Charles stands back watching with a satisfied smile. The shock and sheepishness on his family’s faces is vindicating after so many months of teasing and disbelief.

Charles has never been one to say “I told you so” but … I told you so.

***

The cheers of the crowd are deafening as the chequered flag waves for Charles at the Monaco Grand Prix. He can hardly believe it — finally, a win at his home race!

As he pulls into parc fermé and jumps out of the car, the emotions hit him. Pure elation at ending the long wait for a home victory. Relief at overcoming the team’s doubts. But most of all, excitement for what comes next.

The podium ceremony.

And with the Monegasque royal family presenting the trophies as usual, Charles knows exactly who will be handing him the winner’s trophy.

He can barely stand still through the anthems, eager for his moment with you. The weekend has been agony, so close to you yet having to pretend that there is nothing between the two of you.

But not anymore.

At last, the royal family walks onto the podium led by none other than Princess Y/N. Charles’ heart skips a beat at the sight of you gliding towards him in a figure-hugging red midi dress, sunlight glinting off your carefully styled hair. You somehow manage to become more and more beautiful every time he sees you.

Stopping in front of him, you give him a subtle wink before launching into the customary congratulatory speech. Charles nods along, not hearing a word as he zones out while admiring the stunning woman he gets to call his own.

At last, you turn to pick up the trophy. “It is my honor to present this trophy to our victor, who represents Monaco with pride in everything he does, Charles Leclerc,” you announce, holding it out to him with a brilliant smile.

In that moment, Charles throws all caution to the wind. As he accepts the trophy, he reaches out and pulls you into a passionate kiss.

The crowd below erupts in shocked cheers and screams. You melt into the kiss for a blissful moment before gently pulling back, your eyes sparkling. Charles grins at you breathlessly.

“Worth the wait?” He murmurs.

“Absolutely,” you whisper back, squeezing his hand. “I’m so proud of you, mon amour.”

Turning back to the roaring crowd, Charles wraps an arm around your waist and thrusts your linked hands into the air in triumph.

Looking out at the paddock, Charles sees the priceless dumbfounded looks on his fellow drivers’ faces. The Ferrari PR team looks ready to pass out in horror. Reporters are screaming questions and snapping photos frantically.

But Charles only has eyes for the radiant princess at his side. At long last, he has made your love public for the whole world to see.

Later, after celebrations around the circuit have started winding down in favor of moving to lounges and clubs for the night, Charles and you escape for a private moment together.

“That was quite the reveal,” you say with an amused quirk of your eyebrow.

Charles laughs. “I know, subtlety has never been my strong suit. I hope you don’t mind.”

You caress his face tenderly. “Of course not. I’m happy to finally be by your side. No more hiding.”

Charles kisses you deeply, all the love and longing of the past months pouring into it.

When you finally break apart, foreheads touching, he murmurs, “No more doubts. No more teasing. They all know now that you’re real and all mine.”

“Forever yours,” you whisper back. And seal it with another perfect kiss.

***

“I can’t believe it. I just … actually can’t believe it,” Max mutters, staring at the large screens around the paddock that are showing you and Charles gazing adoringly into each other’s eyes during the post-race interviews.

“Lord Perceval … dating an actual princess,” Carlos muses in disbelief.

“And not just any princess, his teenage celebrity crush!" Lando exclaims.

“I guess we owe him an apology,” Pierre says sheepishly.

“Big time,” Daniel agrees. “We gave him so much crap for making her up.”

“Speak of the devil,” Max mutters as Charles strides into the room, hand-in-hand with you.

An awkward silence descends on the group. Charles clears his throat, enjoying their obvious discomfort.

“I believe you all know my girlfriend, Her Serene Highness Y/N Grace Stephanie Caroline, Hereditary Princess of Monaco and Marquise of Baux. But you can just call her Your Serene Highness or Princess Y/N,” he says politely.

The guys mumble greetings, not quite meeting your eyes. You smile graciously. “You can just call me Y/N. Any friend of Charles is a friend of mine and there’s no need for titles around friends.”

Charles narrows his eyes. “Actually I don’t think that will be necessary. I believe they should maintain protocol and address you properly.”

You shoots him a look. “Darling, it’s fine, really. I want your friends to feel comfortable around me.”

But Charles crosses his arms, not budging. “No, it’s not fine. I must insist that they observe the formal mode of address for royalty.”

The drivers shift awkwardly again. You pull Charles aside with a soothing smile.

“What are you doing?” You whisper. “I’m trying to put them at ease.”

“I know but they deserve to squirm for a bit after how much they mocked us,” Charles whispers back petulantly.

You bite back a smile. “Don’t be silly. I know their teasing hurt but let’s move past it. Can you really blame them for thinking it sounds like a made up fairytale? Put yourself in their shoes.”

Charles sighs. “I guess you’re right ... I just want them to respect you.”

“They will, in time,” you say gently. “But forcing them to be overly formal won’t accomplish that. I’m still just me.”

Charles nods reluctantly. “Okay fine, we’ll do it your way.”

You turn back to the drivers who are trying to act natural and pretending that they didn’t just listen in on your conversation with a bright smile. “I’ve heard so much about all of you,” you say. “Charles speaks very highly of his fellow drivers.”

“We’re, uh, happy to finally meet you too,” Max manages to get out.

“Yeah, congrats mate,” Daniel offers weakly.

More awkward silence follows. Charles smirks, deciding to twist the knife a bit more.

“I know you all had your doubts about me landing a catch like Y/N,” he says casually. “But I can’t blame you. Even I can hardly believe someone so incredible would fall for me.”

He gazes at you adoringly as you blush prettily while the drivers fidget uneasily.

“Anyway, as you can now see, she’s real and we are happier than ever!" Charles concludes brightly.

“We’re really sorry for not believing you,” Lando bursts out sincerely. “And all the teasing.”

The others chime in with apologies and congratulations. Charles graciously accepts, reassuring them no hard feelings.

After you have throughly charmed them all and departed, the group surrounds Charles excitedly.

“Alright, you have to give us all the details,” Max demands. “How did you meet? How did you get her to go out with you? When did it get serious?”

Charles just laughs. “It’s a long story. But the important thing is that she’s the only one for me. Despite everyone doubting us, our love was real from the start.”

“Pretty epic to have a real life princess as your soulmate,” Pierre says dreamily.

“Just remember you knew me back when you all thought she was imaginary,” Charles jokes.

“We’ll never live it down,” Carlos groans goodnaturedly.

Charles smiles, feeling lighter and happier than he has in ages. The long struggle to prove himself has been worth it. Now he has everything — the win, the girl, and the utter shock and joy of proving to the world that even his wildest dreams can come true.

And this is only the beginning for him and his beloved princess.

6K notes · View notes

thydungeongal · 4 months ago

Text

"The purpose of a system is what it does" is a systems thinking heuristic coined by Stafford Beer. "Heuristic" is a fancy word that means "cool Greek way of saying a practical analytic method." It can be used to analyze, well, pretty much any system. For example, if one were to take the United States insurance-based healthcare system under scrutiny with this metric, one could conclude that the purpose of the system is to make some people extremely rich while forcing many people to face a choice between insurmountable medical debt or no healthcare at all. Many would reasonably argue that that is probably not a good thing for a system to do and the system should probably do something else, like allowing people to call an ambulance for an emergency without having to worry about personal bankruptcy, but sadly that is not what the system does.

Now, after that rather heavy example I'm going to go for something lighter: roleplaying games are, in many ways, systems. They're systems for making us imagine a bunch of freaks and using rules to put those imaginary freaks into situations, and we can then imagine that fiction and go "wow, those freaks sure got into situations."

We can thus look at that fictional sequence of events as a narrative produced by the system and according to the initial heuristic conclude that that narrative was the purpose of the system.

Now obviously roleplaying games are not closed systems: they require players in order for anything to happen. Otherwise there is no game and thus no narrative. And one way in which players can interact with games is through ignoring these games' rules. The results of the players ignoring the rules of a game are arguably still a result of the system, which includes the players and the game they are playing, but also not the result of the game if taken as a text (because the text is being sidelined). This is a useful distinction: an individual game or Dungeons & Dragons can produce a narrative that touches upon themes of queer romance. But the text of Dungeons & Dragons isn't the part of the system doing it. Much as I have said before: if two players choose to rub their character sheets together and make mwah mwah noises, that is arguably a thing that would have not happened without the context of the game. But it could have happened within the context of any game, not just Dungeons & Dragons.

This is why, when talking about the stories that these games produce, I find it more useful to talk about these games as systems taken in and of themselves. Any game can effectively be changed to produce any kind of story. Even Dungeons & Dragons has been modified and utilized to produce a high production value science fiction story starring a cast of really funny comedians. That isn't exactly a testament to the storytelling potential of Dungeons & Dragons for the sake of producing science fiction stories, something it as a game has very little input over. The cast could have produced that story while changing or ignoring any number of games, so it is more of a testament to the quality of the cast and production.

I've talked at length before about the sorts of narratives that Dungeons & Dragons produces and even though the exact details will vary from one edition to another, to take a very high-level perspective of the game as a single thing: D&D produces stories about characters going to dangerous places to overcome adversity while having their resources slowly drained until they have to leave the dangerous place, only to return (or go to a different dangerous place) once they have recovered and potentially grown stronger. Besides these narratives the game also produces experiences for its players around the table: the dramatic tension preceding an important roll, the release when a player rolls just high enough for a character to succeed, and the absolute explosion of energy often followed by rolling a natural 20 are all experiences that the game produces.

(While I personally tend to prefer the pre-WotC editions of the game, the designers of D&D 3e were absolutely cooking when they decided to unify most checks in the game under d20 roll-high. While there have been some unpredictable effects downstream from this change, the use of a d20 where players really want to roll a big number is good design in my opinion, in the sense that it makes the game produce cool experiences.)

Now that's all fine, but I don't always want to talk about D&D because there is a better D&D out there: Rolemaster, a game that owes its basic structure to D&D to such an extent that most of the above points about the sorts of stories and experiences D&D produces apply to it, but is also really stupid.

The core gameplay of Rolemaster revolves around rolling dice and cross-referencing the result of the roll (plus any modifiers) on an appropriate table. The table lookup process itself adds a bit of friction into the game: the process of figuring out the results of an action does slow down play for a bit. The experience this produces for its players is one of tension, much like waiting for a roll in D&D. Now, the thing about those really high and really low rolls in Rolemaster is that they will result in more rolls. On other tables. What happens, around the table, in those situations, is the tension of waiting for a roll followed by a massive explosion of energy which does not yet release all the tension, as more rolls need to be made. There are multiple explosions and releases of tension, until the final roll. Which will invariably give you one of the dumbest results in the world.

Rolemaster is supposedly a realistic, grim and gritty game, and while it is true that characters are more likely to suffer permanent harm that actually has a tangible mechanical effect on them than they would in D&D, the important thing to understand about Rolemaster is that while most of the results on its myriad tables will skew towards the mundane, due to the way it treats its d100-based resolution system as pretty much a glorified d20 with a bit more granularity between the extremes, a lot of extremely shitty bullshit is always lurking at the sidelines. And unlike in D&D where a natural 20 produces just a success (and maybe some extra damage in combat, depending on edition) and a natural 1 produces just a failure (fumbles are house rules within the context of D&D), in Rolemaster's case there are actual prefabricated results encoded into the game. Which are really stupid.

All of which is to say: you know all those stories about a D&D game where a player rolled a 1 and the GM made up a really silly failure on the spot and you couldn't help but roll your eyes because that's not actually something that the game produced natively and no one within this game's community can actually agree to what a natural 1 should represent within the fiction? Rolemaster is a game which natively produces those stupid results, because someone went through the trouble of making that stupid result a part of one of the many tables you will inevitably end up rolling on.

Dungeons & Dragons allows for stupid things to happen via giving its players the power of narrative editing to make up their own stupid things. In Rolemaster those stupid things are bespoke, custom made, and provided to you the player, no modding required.

#rolemaster #long post

175 notes · View notes

bobacupcake · 2 years ago

Note

Can you do one about the Sea of Thieves water?

so . there was a biiig long talk about this at siggraph one year!! you can watch that here if you'd like . in the time between me getting this ask and me fully recreating the water, acerola also released a great video about it . the biiig underlying thing they do and the reason why it looks so good is they are making a Really Detailed Ocean Mesh in realtime using something called an FFT (fast fourier transform) to simulate hundreds of thousands of waves, based on a paper by TESSENDORF

WHAT IS AN FFT - we'll get to that. first we have to talk about the DFT - the discreet fourier transform. let's say you have a SOUND. it is a c chord - a C, an E, and a G, being played at the same time. all sounds are waves!!! so when you play multiple sounds at the same time, those waves combine!!! like here: the top is all 3 notes playing together, so they form the waveform at the bottom!!

now if someone handed you the bottom wave, could you figure out each individual note that was being played? how about if someone handed you a wave of One Hundred Notes. you would think it would be very hard. and well, it would be, if not for the Discreet Fourier Transform.

essentially, there is a way to take a bunch of points on a waveform comprised of a bunch of different waves, add them all together, do some messed up stuff with imaginary numbers, that will spit back out at you what individual waves are present. i made a little test program at the start of all this: the left are the waves i am putting into my Big Waveform, the top right is what that ends up looking like, and all the little rainbow points on it are being sampled to spit out the graph at the bottom right: it shows which frequency bands the DFT is finding (here it is animated)

this has enormous use cases in anything that deals with audio and image processing, and also,

THE OCEAN

tessendorf is basically like, hey, People Who Are Good At The Ocean say that a buuuunch of sine waves do a pretty good job of approximating what it looks like. and by a bunch they mean like, hundreds of thousands to millions. oh no.... if only there was a way we could easily deal with millions of sine waves..........

well GREAT news. not only can you do the DFT in one direction, but you can also do it in REVERSE. if you were to be given the frequency graph of a noise for example, you could use an INVERSE DFT to calculate what the combined wave graph looks like at any given time. so if you were to have say, the frequency graph of an oceaaaan, for example, you could calculate what the Ocean wave looks like at any given time. and lucky for us, it works in two dimensions. and thats the foundation of the simulation !!!!!

BUT WAIT

as incredible as the DFT is, it doesn't scale very well. the more times you have to do it, the slower it gets, exponentially, and we are working with potentially millions of sine waves here

THE FAST FOURIER TRANSFORM here we are . the fast fourier transform is a way of doing the discreet fourier transform, except, well, fast. i am Not going to explain the intricacies of it because its very complex, but if you want to learn more there are a ton of good 30 minute long videos on youtube about it . but essentially, due to the nature of sine waves repeating, you can borrow values as you go, and make the calculation Much faster (from exponential growth to logarithmic growth which is much much slower, and scales very well at higher numbers). it's, complicated, but the important part is it's so much faster and the diagram kind of looks like the shadow the hedgehog story plot

so if we use the inverse FFT on a graph of a rough estimate of what frequency of waves in the ocean (called a spectrum, basically tells us things like how many small waves, how many big waves, how different waves follow the wind direction. sea of thieves uses one called the phillips spectrum but there are better ones out there!!) now we have our waves !!!!!!! we can also use another inverse FFT to get the normals of the waves, and horizontal displacement of the waves (sharpening peaks and broadening valleys) through some derivatives . yayy calculus

OK MATH IS OVER. WE HAVE OUR WAVES!!! they are solid pink and look like pepto bismol. WHAT NOW

i cheated a bit here they look better than not being shaded because i am using the normals to reflect a CUBEMAP to make it look shiny. i think sea of thieves does this too but they didnt mention it in their talk. they did mention a FEW THINGS THEY DID THOUGH

FIRST OFF - SUBSURFACE SCATTERING. this is where the sun pokes through since water is translucent. SSS IS REALLY EXPENSIVE !!!!!! so they just faked it. do you remember the wave sharpening displacement i mentioned earlier? they just take the value where the waves are being sharpened and this will pretty naturally show off the areas that should have subsurface scattering (the sides of waves). they make it shine through any time you are looking towards the sun. they also add a bit of specular ! sss here is that nice blue color, and specular is the shiny bits coming off the sun. the rest of the lighting is the cubemap i mentioned earlier, i dont know if thats what they use but it looks nice !!!!!

then the other big thing that they do is the FOAM !! sorry i lied. there's more math. last one. you remember the wave sharpening displacement i Just mentioned. well they used that to find something called the JACOBIAN and well im not even going to begin to try and explain what it means but functionally what it does, is when the jacobian is NEGATIVE it means waves are clipping into eachother. and that means we should draw some foam!!! we can also blur and fade out the foam texture over time and continuously write to it to give it some movement, and bias this value a bit to make more or less foam. they do both of these!!!

YAYYYYY !! OK !! THAT'S SEA OF THIEVES WATER!!!!! THANKS FOR WAITING ALL THIS TIME. you can see my journey here if you would like to i have tagged it all oceanquest2023

thank you everyone for joining me :) i had fun

#ask #potion of answers your question #randomentalist #gamedev stuff #long post #oceanquest2023

1K notes · View notes

algebraic-dumbass · 3 months ago

Note

You seem to like Lockhart's Lament, and I really don't get it. Besides being (intentionally?) pretentious, I feel like it massively misrepresents what mathematicians actually do. We spend most of our time doing creative problem solving, working towards some fixed external goal. Not creative design, where the end goal is up to our own whims.

To take an example I've seen quoted, but fine particularly egregious: "A piece of mathematics is like a poem, and we can ask if it satisfies our aesthetic criteria: Is this argument sound? Does it make sense? Is it simple and elegant? Does it get me closer to the heart of the matter?" This is a massive false equivalence!! The first two are factual statements, either the argument is sound or not!! Yeah there's an element of communication which is more subjective, but comparing the soundness of an argument to its elegance completely lost my respect for him.

I mean, I like Lockhart's Lament because I find it explains very well what math actually is as opposed to what people who only did math without proofs (i.e. most people who quit math after highschool, in my experience) believe math is. Now I do agree with you that it is pretentious, and probably intentionally. Now, the full paragraph of what you quoted is

And I haven’t even mentioned the lack of mathematical criticism in school. At no time are students let in on the secret that mathematics, like any literature, is created by human beings for their own amusement; that works of mathematics are subject to critical appraisal; that one can have and develop mathematical taste. A piece of mathematics is like a poem, and we can ask if it satisfies our aesthetic criteria: Is this argument sound? Does it make sense? Is it simple and elegant? Does it get me closer to the heart of the matter? Of course there’s no criticism going on in school— there’s no art being done to criticize!

I think what Lockhart might be meaning here (or at least, that's how I interpreted it when I read it) is that students in school never get to experience what it is to "have an opinion" (broadly) about a piece of mathematics. I think that under the word "criticism", Lockhart lumps in "checking the soundness of an argument" and more subjective matters such as "is the argument elegant?". Both types of reflections on an argument are a part of a mathematician's work, though I do agree with you that putting soundness on the same level as elegance is misguided at best.

However, I don't think it's fair to throw away the whole thing because of one comparison. I believe this because I mostly see it as a convenient piece of writing to point to so people who have a highschool understanding of what math is can get a slightly better idea. Though it is rare for me these days, from what I remember from when I talked with non-math people about math is that they believe it is a set of predefined rules, and are often baffled you can even do research in it. For these people, Lockhart's Lament would be at least helpful. This is why I link it on my posts, obviously to anyone actually familiar to math it has little value, but I expect some non-math people to maybe stumble upon it.

As for the "misrepresentation" part, I don't know. I will concede I have not yet done actual research so maybe I still have a flawed understanding of how it happens. I will say I especially like the example of the triangle in the box as it (in my opinion) clearly demonstrates how (1) you do think about an abstract problem of your choice and (2) you solve it, not by pure creativity, but with some creativity and problem-solving involved. In fact Lockhart even says

On the other hand, once you have made your choices ([...]) then your new creations do what they do, whether you like it or not. This is the amazing thing about making imaginary patterns: they talk back! The triangle takes up a certain amount of its box, and I don’t have any control over what that amount is. There is a number out there, maybe it’s two-thirds, maybe it isn’t, but I don’t get to say what it is. I have to find out what it is.

This I think clearly underlines that mathematics is not creative design. The metaphor is useful to rid people of their preconcieved ideas of what math is and I believe that's why Lockhart uses it.

Again maybe I just have a very flawed understanding of what research is. What do i know. I'm just an algebraic-dumbass

(By all means if you have a better piece of writing I can reference to do the whole explaining-of-what-math-actually-is for me, do tell! I would be very happy to have other things to point to!)

#ask #algebraic-dumbass

48 notes · View notes

dwellordream · 11 months ago

Text

A Guide to Writing Children and Young Teens

Most of this information is derived from the book Yardsticks by Chip Wood, an informational text aimed at educators and parents who are curious as to how children change developmentally from age to age. The book is not just based on the author's observations and experiences as a teacher but on the work of scholars such as Arnold Gesell, Dorothy H. Cohen, William Crain, Maria Montessori, Jean Piaget, Robert Pianta, Caroline Pratt, and many others. Writing Four-Year-Olds:

"Four-year olds are flexible, exciting, and creative creatures who love to exaggerate and engage in imaginative play. A four-year-old's tall tale about an adventure she had with an imaginary friend may puzzle a parent or teacher but delight the four-year-old. And this play is critical for the development of fours' understanding of right and wrong, early application of social rules, and manners. They sometimes can seem especially "bossy" (particularly with their real and imaginary friends), but this assertiveness is positive rehearsal for learning acceptable limits and how to be a real friend and helper." (Wood 2017)

Traits:

Have trouble with reading and writing, as well as most close-up visual activities

Awkward with writing utensils, handcrafts, and small movements

Clumsy; collisions and spills are common

Friendly and talkative; will work near but not with a buddy

Love dress-up games and acting out drama

Enjoy 'potty language' and repeating curse words

Love to be given 'jobs' such as setting the table or folding clothes

Are often fearful at night-time

Writing Five-Year-Olds:

"Five-year-olds take in the world through their senses. They see, smell, touch, hear, and taste just about everything--one thing after another, but only one thing at a time. Their intense focus on detail enables them to see not just the butterfly but the pattern on its wings, its proboscis uncurling into a flower, its antennae waving delicately. Fives can give sustained attention to anything that fascinates them." (Wood 2017)

Traits:

Find it hard to space letters and numbers while writing

Better control when running and jumping than 4 year olds

Often fall or slip out of chairs

Interpret words in the most literal/basic sense

Like to explain things to peers and adults in the most detail possible

Struggle to see accept there is more than one way to play a game or complete a task

May actually believe toys or other objects are alive

Can become stuck in repetitive behavior out of fear of trying new things and failing (such as drawing the same images again and again)

Seek adult approval more than 6 year olds

Writing Six-Year-Olds:

"At six, children's capacity for logical thought begins to blossom. As in Piaget's classic experiment, a six-year-old will tell you that two equal balls of clay remain equal in volume even when one is rolled out into a snake shape. Sixes also begin to grasp cause and effect in the natural world, understanding, for example, that it's the wind that makes the trees move, not vice versa." (Wood, 2017)

Traits:

May experience more frequent illness than earlier years

Are easily upset when criticized by adults or peers

Often in a hurry and sloppy because of it

Teething as they start to lose baby teeth; chew on fingernails, hair, pencils, etc

Start to value competition

Begin to experience anxiety to perform well

Often bossy and critical towards friends

Begin to care intensely about having a 'best' friend

Can understand past and present as a concept and identify historical markers such as year/date

Comfortable working/playing in noisy, busy environments

Writing Seven-Year-Olds:

"Seven-year-olds are serious children who see and feel with a thoughtful intensity. After the outwardly expressive exuberance of six, sevens turn inward to consolidate the enormous cognitive and emotional growth they've just experienced. They become quieter and more sensitive, self-conscious, and self-absorbed as they figure out how to manage new feelings and cognitive structures. Seven is a year of moving forward cautiously, of craving security and structure while avoiding risk and uncertainty." (Wood, 2017)

Traits:

Crave stability and predictability; like knowing their schedule

Become more perfectionist than earlier years and begin to worry about schoolwork for the first time

Usually have a 'best' friend but who that is varies wildly day by day

Love being read aloud to, especially longer books with chapters

Moodier than 6 and 5 year olds

Enjoy being in confined spaces/hiding during games

Start to develop more coordination in sports

Often begin to write far smaller/neater than in prior years

Typically want to keep their personal items neat and tidy

Love secret codes such as Morse code and Pig Latin

Mistakes in schoolwork seriously disturb them

Love to classify and sort things

Begin to enjoy board games and online games

Can memorize poems, songs, and chants easily

Writing Eight-Year-Olds:

"Eight-year-olds wake up in the morning with plans for adventure percolating before their feet hit the floor. To be eight is to be inventive and creative, full of energy, curiosity, and imagination, always in a hurry to try the next new thing--or to create the next new thing themselves. With a friend, or better yet, a group of friends, eights roll along with plans for a parade or a play, thrilled with their truly wonderful ideas for the "what" and blithely unconcerned with the "how"." (Wood, 2017)

Traits:

Develop a love for jokes and sense of humor becomes more refined

Start to care deeply about morality and fairness

Growth spurts can lead to physical clumsiness

Adjust well to change and bounce back faster than 7 year olds

Start to desire the approval of their peers as much as the approval of adults

Begin to form larger friendship groups or cliques

Very talkative and tend to exaggerate about their experiences

Become more ambitious in terms of schoolwork or personal creative projects

Writing Nine-Year-Olds:

"Fairness begins to matter a great deal as nines take on the cognitive task of understanding ethical behavior at a new level. They're concerned about global justice: Why are some people poor? Why are we allowing climate change to happen? Why are some people cruel to animals? Nines show concern about fairness on the local level, too, and often feel singled out for unfair treatment by a teacher, parent, or coach. Their complaints--signs of their increasing understanding of and sensitivity to how the world works--can also be a way for nines to express their growing sense of peer importance and group solidarity." (Wood, 2017)

Traits:

Often eager to try new styles of dress or appearance, such as haircuts or different clothes

May begin to bite nails, twist at hair, make odd expressions to deal with tension or discomfort

Have a general sense of popularity and want to avoid associating with 'unpopular' children

Enjoy negotiating and arguing with adults

Can revert to 'baby talk' when they feel nervous or silly

Begin to appreciate inappropriate/'edgy' jokes, will mimic online trends/memes, especially sexual/racial/body humor

Desire to use social media to express themselves

Start to lose interest in imaginative play; more focused on facts/how things work

Want explanations as to why they have to do homework or chores from adults

Writing Ten-Year-Olds:

"Happy and easygoing tens generally look up to and admire their teachers and parents and take real pleasure in both family outings and teacher-led activities. They enjoy their classmates, too, and can engage productively in collaborative, project-based learning. Because of their relative calmness and instinct for getting along with others, ten-year-olds do well in a variety of group configurations, including mixed-age groups: They can often help elevens and even twelves in cooperative pursuits." (Wood, 2017)

Traits:

Often enjoy reading more than younger years

Ready to start using tools such as compasses, protractors, rulers, and templates

May be hotheaded, but are also quicker to forgive than older children

Are more sensitive and empathetic towards friends than 8 or 9 year olds

Generally like being able to lead/guide younger children

Can concentrate for longer periods of time than younger years

Usually eager to learn new things

Start to enjoy word problems and riddles

Writing Eleven-Year-Olds:

"Elevens are, in a sense, electrified. As adolescence begins, cognitive structures in the brain are rewiring themselves at the same amazing speed at which the body is beginning to transform. Relationships with peers and adults are turning topsy-turvy. At home and in school, academically and socially, eleven-year-olds are busy engaging whole new worlds with a sense of outward boldness, yet inward tentativeness. Their lives crackle with the energy of change as they begin to establish a sense of physical and emotional identity." (Wood, 2017)

Traits:

Stay up late compared to younger children and have more trouble rousing in the morning

Often act out more at home compared to in school

Huge appetites and sleep for longer when given the chance

Often blurt out rude comments without thinking

Cis girls typically have an earlier growth spurt than cis boys

Can become very indecisive and fearful of making mistakes

Like to challenge teachers and parents over rules

Can debate without it becoming personal

Imitate more sophisticated adult language

Begin to focus on what they want to do as adults

Writing Twelve-Year-Olds:

"Along with intense enjoyment of their peers, twelve generally enjoy talking with adults outside the home and can do so with friendliness and a sense of confidence. Yet, twelves can also be unpredictable and hard to read. One day, they fervently want to do schoolwork as part of a group; the next day, they just as fervently want to work alone. They often say "That's not what I meant!" when a teacher misreads their seemingly rude tone or comment. At home, moody, introverted, childish behavior or one-word responses reflect their need to rest and regroup in a safe environment." (Wood, 2017)

Traits:

Want parents and teachers to take them and their ideas seriously

More open to making new friendships than 11 year olds

Often struggle to follow through with practicing a sport or instrument in their free time

Want to help peers with schoolwork

Can appreciate complex moral issues

May begin to discover a subject or talent they excel at

Better able to switch between playful and serious than younger children

Love testing out new slang and pop culture references

Want to make their own money

Writing Thirteen Year-Olds:

"Thirteen is an age of dramatic contrasts. Because thirteen-year-olds commonly slip backward developmentally as well as move forward, they may seem like younger twelve-year-olds one day and more mature than they really are the next. They want adults to notice, listen, and talk to them but also to leave them alone. They're engaged one minute and bored the next, suddenly confident and just as suddenly unsure, alternately outgoing and withdrawn, brooding alone and then shrieking and shouting with friends." (Wood, 2017)

Traits:

May struggle with hygiene and/or acne

Most cis girls have begun menstruating by now

Extremely skilled at mimicking peer behavior

Often mean as a defensive strategy when worried about being ignored or left out

Far more adept at sarcasm than younger children

Can become very quiet and secretive compared to their younger selves

More judgmental of teachers than younger students, will gossip about adults

Interested in global justice issues but struggle with empathy in daily life

Can vary between reserved, stoic behavior and unusual aggression when asked questions by adults

Become messier with their personal belongings

Writing Fourteen-Year-Olds:

"To fourteen-year-olds, the question "Who am I?" seems best answered in terms of "Who are we?" The way that others see these students seems to matter more to them than how they see themselves. Fourteens are moving steadily toward peers and away from parents and teachers as the central figures in their lives. They bond in small social groups, travel street and school together, and pour enormous physical, emotional, and cognitive energy into developing an adolescent subculture." (Wood, 2017)

Traits:

Often embarrassed by the adults in their lives and become very critical of parents

View school as primarily a social experience, don't want to miss out on seeing friends everyday

A small minority will become sexually active

Typically very interested in current events and politics

Will say "I'm bored" when confused, or pretend challenging schoolwork is easy to save face

Love to correct adults and peers on information; hate being lectured

Very expressive faces and body language, can seem contemptuous for no reason

Often become interested in researching various subjects

More willing to admit an error than 12 or 11 year olds; redoing work is not as daunting

Able to joke around with adults

Enjoy mysteries and 'unknown' areas of science/math/history

#writing #children #word to the wise #education

106 notes · View notes

emmkitt · 1 year ago

Text

CONNECTION: LOST AU

(Inanimate Insanity + HFJONE + BFDI)

IVE WANTED TO MAKE AN OSC AU FOR SOOO LONG AND I FINALLY HAVE AN IDEA ahem

shoutout to @somebean81 for helping me figure out some of the details of this. GET READY FOR A LOTTA WORDS

—>”i” is an Algebralien. Within this universe, Algebraliens excell not only in arithmetic, but understanding of the concept of death. The Radio— which exists in The Waiting Room after an object becomes deceased— is monitored and controlled by the Algebraliens, and the sequence of numbers input within the machine determine the universe the object will be transported to.

—>’i’ became enamoured with this technology, but frustrated with the fact they were excluded, as they were not a number themself.

—>’i’ began to experiment with The Radio, managing to hack the systems and create a new input, that being “i”, which would instantly teleport an object to him. Being as the input was figuratively and literally “imaginary,” the only being capable of producing the input was ‘i.’ An object would input a numeric value into The Radio and ‘i’ would hack it before the antennae could be raised.

—>Almost immediately, when strange objects began running about, the other Algebraliens discovered ‘i’s shenanigans.

—>One of the biggest offenses was to tamper with The Radio systems, which led to ‘i’s immediate exile to Earth.

—>As ‘i’ could not appear as an Algebralien on earth, he was forced into an object disguise, that being a character he deemed ‘Steve Cobs.’

—>The Algebraliens had yet to understand simply how Cobs had managed to hack The Radio, and until then, Cobs was able to continue hacking the system. He would only teleport a single object on occassion, as a means of ensuring the Algebraliens would not catch on.

—>A new type of object Soul Cobs had not yet known about was discovered immediately, called a Wandering Soul. Wandering Souls are deceased objects which have existed in The Waiting Room for centuries, leading to the object no longer retaining any idea of their former identity. These souls appear as amorphous blobs and tend to be quite disoriented.

—>Cobs initially felt pity for these souls, and in his first experiment he created a robotic phone-shaped body for one of the souls. The first experiments, however, proved unsuccessful, and the souls were completely destroyed in the process of attempting to ‘revive’ them.

—>After three failed experiments, however, Cobs finally managed to perfect his creation. Mephone4 was the first Wandering Soul successfully revived.

—>Mephone4S, who was created shortly after Mephone4, was another success, however unlike 4, 4S retained the knowledge that he was once dead. 4 was programmed without this memory. When 4S sacrificed himself to save 4 (which ultimately destroyed his soul), Mephone4 received the memories about how he was technically not ‘alive.’ (Cue the existential crisis!), along with some of 4S’s memories.

—>As time went on, Cobs began to program his creations to be less and less human and more robotic in nature, completely stripping the once living objects of their humanity. He figured that would make it easier for him to inevitably send his Mephone creations to get revenge on the Algebraliens.

—>During his quest to find more Wandering Souls, Cobs accidentally teleported a regular soul to his laboratory, that being a copper lantern known as Airy.

—>Cobs debated between simply killing Airy to send him back to The Waiting Room, but the other convinced him to let him live, with the offer of his knowledge of The Waiting Room and The Radio.

—>With his apathetic personality, Airy became a great assistant to Cobs, and proved to be quite intelligent with the technology. Cobs soon programmed robotic enhancements for Airy, as a means of ensuring Airy would not be easy to kill.

—>With the newfound invention of Recovery Centers, the amount of Wandering Souls available was becoming scarce. Cobs, being dead set on his goal, begins to resort to living objects, figuring that any soul should work.

—>Obviously, theres a bit more moral and ethical conflict there, especially since these souls understand who they are, unlike the Wandering Souls, and Cobs was essentially forcing them into a new form and role.

—>The first victim to this was Fan, who was immediately discovered to be missing by Test Tube.

—>One of 4S’ memories which Mephone4 retained was that of Cobs’ plans to resort to living souls to create more Mephones. Initially brushing it aside as a silly dream, Mephone4 realizes this is serious, and that Fan had probably been kidnapped.

—>Next, Tissues and YinYang also disappeared.

—>As a Mephone, Fan (MeFan1) was programmed with the least humanity. He’s essentially a shell of the formerly enthusiastic and friendly object he used to be. Fan was Cobs’ first target, as he has almost unlimited knowledge of the II contestants, which was the only memories Cob’s allowed him to retain.

—>As a Mephone, Tissues (MephoneT) glitches a lot (condishawn) and is deemed a failed experiment by Cobs because of this.

—>As a Mephone, YinYang (MephoneY) was a bit of a tricky case for Cobs. Not realizing that they essentially shared two souls, Cobs wiped their memories and unknowingly only wiped Yin’s successfully. Yang retained their memories, and because of that they talk back to Cobs and refuse to aid in his plans. Yang eventually becomes distressed, as his brother is basically gone.

—>Mephone4 realizes something must be done about this before he can lose more of his contestants. Something involving The Waiting Room and The Radio. However, Mephone4 realized he could not die again, otherwise his soul would not be recoverable.

—>Eventually, an Algebralien is finally sent to earth to investigate after The Radio signals start going haywire. That Algebralien is Two, an Inter-Dimensional Manager, who disguises themself as a kiwi.

—>They meet Mephone4 and the II contestants, who are immediately suspicious of the newcomer. Two ends up disabling their disguise as a means of gaining trust. Mephone4 remains skeptical, but the contestants are desperate to get their friends back and agree to listen to the Algebralien.

—>The plan is simple; A contestant would die to enter The Waiting Room. They would use Two’s notes to defend the radio against Cob’s hacking, and then Mephone4 would recover them.

—>Test Tube was the one who volunteered for the job, as she desperately wanted Fan back.

—>Everything seemed to be going according to plan, however shortly after Test Tube entered The Waiting Room, the II cast were under attack by Cobs and his mephone army.

—>During the fight, Mephone4 ended up sacrificing himself to save Bot. MephoneY (YinYang), as they had some of their memories retained, managed to rebel against Cobs and also died protecting the living objects from the mephones.

—>By successfully disabling The Radio, the Wandering Souls Cobs had collected to create his mephones glitched out, and his army collapsed.

—>In the EPIC FINAL BATTLE!! Two was able to use their power to transport Cobs and Airy (I didnt forget him) to The Waiting Room permanently, with a radio that does not work.

SIDE NOTES:

-When a soul is transformed into a Mephone, living or wandering, the soul becomes no longer recoverable, meaning when they die they’re permadead.

-Test Tube is stuck in The Waiting Room now, sorry :(

-As they were not Wandering Souls when transformed into Mephones, Fan and Tissues did not ‘die’ when The Radio was disabled. However, they are not able to be reverted back to their old form.

-Airy received several robotic enhancements from Cobs.

-Two is one of the head Algebraliens, and is responsible for maintaining balance between universes and managing The Radio systems. This is part of the reason why they are rarely at the equation playground; they’re often bouncing between universes to deal with dimensional nonsense. They have a radio built into their ‘stomach,’ which allows them to quickly travel through space and time.

-Along with Inter-dimensional management and radio system management, Algebraliens all have an object disguise form, and occassionally visit The Waiting Room to help newly deceased objects grow accustomed to the place.

-Other characters not mentioned, such as MePad, other II contestants, etc. DO exist but dont really divert much from their canon lore so I didn’t feel the need to mention them here.

UHHH THATS A LOT. if u have questions about the au feel free to ask im soo normal about this idea you dont even know

#bfdi #inanimate insanity #hfjone #osc #object shows #au #tpot #hfjone airy #tpot two #ii mephone4 #uuuu i dont feel like taggin evertrhing else #ii au #bfdi au #hfjone au #connection: lost au

254 notes · View notes

reijisteacup · 1 month ago

Note

How would the boys react to a s/o that works in theatre tech and loves musical theatre?

NOOO ONEE MOURNSSS THE WICKEDDDDDDD oh my fault lol <3333

================================================================================================

Sakamaki's

Shu Sakamaki:

At first, Shu barely reacts. You talk about rigging lights and quick changes, and he just yawns in your direction. But one day, you play him a tragic musical ballad — something slow, mournful, about lost love — and something clicks. Now he secretly listens to your playlist while pretending to nap. He starts showing up at the back of the theatre without warning, watching you work from the shadows. It’s not the musicals he loves — it’s you, completely in your element, hands smudged with paint and eyes gleaming.

“You look happiest when you’re chasing that spotlight… Hah. Maybe I’ll steal it just to see how far you’ll chase me.”

Reiji Sakamaki:

He’s intrigued immediately. Theatre tech requires organization, timing, discipline — traits he values immensely. He asks endless questions about stage blueprints, pulley systems, and show scheduling, even offering “corrections” to your crew’s planning system. He might not get the appeal of musicals at first, but when you excitedly explain story symbolism through lighting cues? He’s sold. He may even design a gothic opera just for you to direct.

“It’s commendable that you pursue something with such structure and artistry. I expect a private performance — curated to my tastes, of course.”

Laito Sakamaki:

He lives for theatre. The drama, the costuming, the gasps from the crowd — it’s all delicious. He’s especially fascinated by your ability to control the ambiance of a scene. “Lighting shapes mood, just like foreplay~” He flirts using musical theatre lyrics, probably sings in the catwalks when you’re setting cues. He’s also very into the secretive intimacy of backstage shadows. Expect him to corner you behind velvet curtains for a kiss… or more.

“How naughty… pulling strings from the shadows. Are you sure you weren’t cast as the seductress, Bitch-chan~?”

Kanato Sakamaki:

He treats theatre like a dollhouse at first. All the moving parts. All the drama. He’s fascinated, even if a little unhinged. He’ll want to help with costume design but ends up distressing fabrics way too far. “It needs more pain.” He has a twisted fondness for tragedies and may get upset if your theatre work leans too comedic or cheerful. But he adores the thought of you creating magic behind the scenes — invisible but vital.

“They don’t see you, do they? You’re always behind the curtain. But I see you. Always. And I’ll make sure no one forgets.”

Ayato Sakamaki:

He’s chaotic and theatrical by nature, so theatre? Fun. Tech work? Boring. But once you let him push a button that sets off a fog machine or drop a set piece mid-rehearsal? He’s obsessed. He also insists on being cast as the lead in every imaginary musical number you sing in the house. “Ore-sama should be the main character!” But he does love the passion in your eyes when you talk about your crew. Secretly jealous of the time you spend there, he may start sabotaging lights just to make you need him.

“You like musicals, right? Then how about a duet — with me as the star, and you begging for more?”

Subaru Sakamaki:

At first, he doesn’t get it. The stage is loud. The people are fake. But the more he watches you sketch out designs or stress over a cue sheet, the more he respects how much work goes into your world. You explain how lights shift mood, how timing is everything — and it hits something in him. He starts quietly helping you build sets late at night. He won’t admit it, but he loves hearing you hum show tunes under your breath, especially when you’re focused. He’s the one who brings you water and glares at anyone who disrespects the crew.

“You make the magic happen and they don’t even see you. Idiots. Tch… You’re incredible.”

Mukami's

Ruki Mukami:

He deeply admires your devotion. Art with purpose — theatre as social commentary or personal catharsis — is something he relates to. He studies your scripts, helps you refine the timing of lighting transitions, and corrects your crew’s grammar on cue cards. He loves seeing you passionate and competent, and he sometimes sits in the back row during rehearsals just to hear your voice calling shots.

“You craft worlds from light and shadow. That’s not unlike how I built this family… Do you understand your own value?”

Kou Mukami:

He adores your love for musicals. He relates to stage life — the applause, the effort, the perfection. He’ll insist on being part of your crew’s costume tests and might offer to choreograph scenes. But he’s also wildly jealous of anyone in your theatre troupe. He’ll “casually” drop by rehearsals dressed in disguise, just to watch you work and glare at any guy who touches you. And when you gush about a musical? He’ll learn the entire soundtrack just to impress you.

“Hey hey~ Why don’t we put on a little show? You, me, and a spotlight. Let’s see who the audience loves more~!”

Yuma Mukami:

He doesn’t care for musicals at first — too flashy. But once he sees how hard you work on set building, rigging, hauling — he gets it. You remind him of himself in the garden: hands dirty, mind focused, making things grow from nothing. He helps you carry flats, repair wood, and keeps snacks on hand for your crew. If anyone disrespects you backstage, they’re dealing with him. He doesn’t say much about your love of musicals, but he listens when you sing while building sets — and grins every time.

“Ain’t no shame in bein’ the one behind the curtain, sowin’ the whole damn play together. You got somethin’ real strong in you.”

Azusa Mukami:

He loves the bittersweet pain in musicals — the broken characters, the longing in love songs, the way everything ends in beauty or tragedy. He’s your biggest cheerleader in the most quiet, eerie way. “I… watched the lights move when you pressed the button… it was… like stars obeyed you.” He collects any prop you throw out and keeps them like sacred relics. Sometimes helps you sew things with trembling fingers and kisses your cuts from hot glue burns.

“You… make a whole world from scraps… it’s… beautiful. I want to… live there… with you…”

Tsukinami's

Carla Tsukinami:

He's skeptical at first. Theatre is, to him, frivolous — a human distraction. But the precision of tech, the elegance of well-crafted stagecraft, eventually earns his respect. He compares you to a weaver of illusion and begins to attend your shows like royalty, sitting still and silent in the back row. He finds your passion… fascinating. If you ever direct an ancient tragedy or an opera with darker themes? He’s utterly enraptured.

“Such delicate illusions… and yet, you command them with iron discipline. How deeply… unexpected.”

Shin Tsukinami:

He laughs at musicals. “Humans singing about their feelings? Dumb.” But then he sees you sprinting from one side of the stage to the other, shouting cues, fixing disasters in real-time… and his tune changes. The chaos of tech work appeals to his feral energy. He steals props to mess with you, then returns them with a smirk. You catch him humming a song from your favorite show one day, and he pretends it didn’t happen.

“Tch. I don’t care about your dumb show. I just… like seeing you all worked up. That’s all. Idiot.”

#diabolik lovers #diabolik lovers fanfiction #ask me anything #x reader #ask response #relationship

36 notes · View notes

itsgerges · 2 months ago

Text

Best Regards Can Young Interference Be A Model For The Solar System Design? https://app.box.com/s/m5knmtma5f0vejev6x17f16idai9yurx or https://app.box.com/s/e9m3r3e9x2o3ncik9xznihwdh2581bsv or https://www.tumblr.com/itsgerges/781095009302740992/can-young-interference-be-a-model-for-the-solar?source=share or https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/254918.html

Paper argument Young Interference Is A Model For The Solar System Design

The Argument Explanation The argument is explained by answer the following 12 questions 1 Can The Space Be Created By Light Beam Energy? 2 How Can Young Interference Be A Model For The Solar System Design? 3 What Are The Useful Results We Get If (Young Interference Can Be A Model For The Solar System Design)? 4 What Proves We Have For The Idea Tells (Young Interference Can Be A Model For The Solar System Design)? 5 How Can The Coherence Of Light Be Occurred? 6 Can The Light Move Into The Past? 7 How Is Planet Formatted (Planet Formation Details)? 8 What problems are made by Young interference as a model for the solar system design? 9 Why Do We See The Bright Fringes As Planets? 10 Does Space Creation Need a speed 1.16 million km per second? 11 What's The Time Definition? 12 Can the solar system design be greater than (Young Interference)? Let's answer in following NOTICE I try to prove that (Young Interference Is A Model For The Solar System Design) in this proof I use many new facts I have discovered- but I don't explain any of these facts here- because all facts are explained and proved in the paper discussions. First Question Can The Space Be Created By Light Beam Energy? What Machine Can Use The Light Beam Energy To Create The Space? Young Interference uses two light beams for coherence of light- and this coherence produced the interference (bright fringes and dark fringes)- if we accept the space is similar to the dark fringes- that tells- the space can be produced by the coherence of light (If we put a small creature as ant inside a dark fringe this creature will see this dark fringe as space around it) Second Question How Can Young Interference Be A Model For The Solar System Design? Young Interference Is Consisted Of Bright Fringes And Dark Fringes And - if Young interference is a model for the solar system- that tells 1 We See The Bright Fringes As Planets (The Fringe Breadth Is Comparable With The Planet Diameter) 2 We See The Dark Fringes As These Planets Orbits (Space)- 3 The bright fringes order is typical to the solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto 4 Planet velocity is defined based on its order because (V2=0.8 V1)- means- each planet velocity = (0.8) of its previous neighbor velocity (for example The Earth velocity 29.8 km/s x (0.8) = 24.1 km/s Mars velocity error 1%) – means- the order defines each planet velocity- that answers the question (why does planet orbit define its velocity?) NOW- let's compare between Young Interference and the solar system design 1 The planets distribution is typical to Young Interference-because- the greatest diameter planet "Jupiter" is found in the middle and the other planets diameters are decreased gradually on both sides typical to the fringes distribution in Young interference- 2 Please remember- I proved Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus and Mars had migrated to its current orbit by that the inner planets original order was (Mercury- Mars- Venus- The Earth) the diameters are decreased gradually from the Earth to Mercury typical to Young Interference (Also the outer planets diameters are decreased gradually from Jupiter to Pluto)- 3 If Young Interference can be used as a model for the solar system that means we see the bright fringes as planets (why? the answer is later) Third Question What Are The Useful Results We Get If (Young Interference Is A Model For The Solar System Design)? we get two useful results which are First result- this proves the conclusion tells (Light Can Move Into The Past)- which can enable us to create the time machine (explained later)(CONT) Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292 Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow

Curriculum Vitae https://www.academia.edu/s/b88b0ecb7c E-mail [email protected], [email protected] [email protected] ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147 Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous VK https://vk.com/id696655587 Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/ Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile Pocket https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar

box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis

1 note · View note

mariacallous · 3 months ago

Text

On Wednesday, Donald Trump declared economic war on the world. Using emergency powers in ways never envisioned by Congress, spinning a history of supposed exploitation by friend and foe, and making up fantastical numbers to quantify his grievances, the U.S. president in one afternoon tore up nearly a century’s worth of efforts to build a mostly peaceful and prosperous global economic order.

Whatever is written from here on about Trump, the word “conservative” should never again be attached to his name—he is a revolutionary, tearing down the old order and watching from the comfortable perch of his wealth and power to see where the pieces land. The question now is whether the rest of the country—Congress, the courts, the American people—will follow him into the abyss.

As the whole world knows by now, Trump has reversed decades of U.S. support for freer trade that had enabled an extraordinary period of global prosperity. In its place, he marched the United States all the way back into the 19th century—when, he noted in glowing terms, the U.S. Treasury was financed in good part by tariffs rather than income taxes. As of April 5, under his latest executive order, all imported goods will face a tariff of at least 10 percent, and as of April 9, most will face much stiffer rates, as high as 49 percent. Using calculations that exist only in the fevered dreams of his advisors, Trump announced “reciprocal” tariffs on most U.S. trading partners—penalties meant to partially offset (“We are being very kind,” he said on Wednesday) the harm supposedly done to the U.S. economy by unfair foreign trading practices.

According to World Trade Organization figures, the European Union’s trade-weighted average import tariff is just 2.7 percent. But by mashing together tariffs along with various regulatory barriers and the imaginary discriminatory effects of European value-added taxes (which apply to purchases regardless of origin), the wildly fabulating president claimed an effective EU tariff on U.S. goods of 39 percent. Magnanimously, he said, Europe will face only a 20 percent tariff on future exports to the United States.

The actual calculations appear to have been made using kindergarten arithmetic. After Trump’s Rose Garden speech, the White House confirmed that the new tariff rates were derived from a simple calculation of the size of the U.S. trade deficit with each country—a methodology with no basis in any economic research whatsoever on how trade deficits are caused.

For those keeping score, some of the biggest losers are the countries that have benefited most from the efforts during the first Trump and Biden administrations to force supply chains to move out of China. Malaysia will face a 24 percent tariff, Thailand 36 percent, Vietnam 46 percent, and Cambodia 49 percent. That is nearly as high as the 54 percent total tariff that China will now face, though for some Chinese goods it will be higher. The United States has not charged broadly based tariffs at such levels since the 1930s and then only for a few years.

The relative winners, if there are any, may be the North American trading partners that Trump has threatened most since taking office—including economic coercion aimed at forcing Canada to become the “51st state.” Canada and Mexico will not face any additional duties, although they have already been hit with 25 percent tariffs on steel and aluminum and the United States has launched “national security” trade investigations into lumber and copper exports that will likely result in additional duties. U.S. importers of Canadian and Mexican products will also continue to pay the 25 percent tariff already imposed on goods not fully compliant with the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement and will be partially hit by a new 25 percent tariff on auto imports effective April 3. That tariff will especially hurt Japanese and South Korean auto exports, but importers of North American-made cars will still be charged the tariff on the “non-U.S. content” in vehicles from Canada and Mexico—an egregious violation of Trump’s own trade agreement with these countries, in case anyone is still paying attention.

The announcement should end any debate over whether Trump wants to use tariffs as a cudgel to negotiate reductions in trade protection abroad. He made it clear that he intends them to be more-or-less permanent. While there may be some room for negotiated deals, Trump used his entire Rose Garden speech to tout the virtues of tariffs as a tool to force manufacturing to locate in the United States to bypass the tariff wall—and to raise revenue to reduce the national debt and enable other taxes to be cut. So ends the wishful thinking of America’s corporate leaders, most of whom believed until Wednesday afternoon that this was all a clever negotiating ploy by a business-friendly president to free up trade. U.S. stock markets have responded accordingly.

Retaliation from other countries is certain, and it’s hard to predict what forms it will take. American farmers will likely pay the highest price as always, but the complete abandonment of all trade rules and norms by the United States means nothing is off the table. Expect measures aimed at harming the technology sector and other centers of U.S. economic power.

But Trump’s convictions on trade are so deep-seated—beliefs he has held for 40 years or more despite enormous changes in the world—that retaliation by the same foreign countries he is convinced wish to harm the United States is unlikely to be effective. The more relevant question is whether he has finally gone too far even for his own supporters.

Trade is not the glamorous issue over which one might have expected a grand struggle over U.S. democracy and the meaning of the Constitution, but that is what is about to ensue. The Constitution could not be clearer that regulating foreign commerce rests in the hands of Congress; Trump’s use of emergency authorities to set punishing tariffs is an egregious violation of the constitutional separation of powers. If the United States remains a functioning democracy—an increasingly big if—then Trump’s actions will not stand. The courts may strike some or all of it down, although the weeks and months these court cases could take would wreak economic havoc in much of the world.

Trump may have gone too far even for the most feckless Congress in U.S. history. On Wednesday night, the Senate—with four Republicans defecting from their leader—passed legislation to terminate Trump’s Jan. 22 “national emergency” declaration, which he used to slap tariffs on Canada. The House of Representatives will not follow quickly; there still seems to be naive hope among Republicans in the lower chamber that Trump will find negotiated resolutions that remove the tariffs. U.S. Rep. Jason Smith, the head of the once powerful Ways and Means Committee, said on Wednesday that the strategy “mirrors President Trump’s successful negotiating approach during his first term.”

Such illusions will fall away as members start hearing from all the small and large manufacturers, retailers, restaurants, auto dealers, farmers, and others in their districts whose profits will be swallowed by the new tariffs. And they will hear from constituents as prices for groceries, cars, and appliances soar. Special House votes in Florida and a Wisconsin Supreme Court vote on Tuesday showed that voter support for Republicans has crashed in the 10 weeks since Trump took office. Political survival will force some Republicans to take a stand.

These are the optimistic scenarios. When the United States last imposed tariffs of similar magnitude in the 1930s, the country and the world were much simpler places. Most trade was finished products going from one country to another, not the modern world of intricately linked supply chains in which components move back and forth across borders. The effects of the new tariffs could be magnified far beyond what the headline numbers suggest. Simply attempting to collect the duties could prove impossible. For the past century, U.S. Customs officials have had no need to verify the “origin” of most products, except for those in free trade areas, because all imports paid the same “most favored nation” tariff rates. Cross-border commerce may grind to a halt while the new system is implemented.

And no one in the White House has the slightest idea how economically disruptive—and politically destabilizing—the tariffs could be for all the developing countries that optimistically signed on to the U.S. vision of a rules-based global trading system. The last time the world’s major powers walked this far down the road to autarky was in the 1930s, and what followed shortly thereafter was the greatest conflagration the world has ever known. Things might turn out better this time. Or they might not.

21 notes · View notes

pssp-lore · 7 days ago

Text

Troll Jobs/The UBI System (part 1 of ???)

OK as i mentioned in the poll this whole thing got very out of hand so apologies in advance for the multi-parter lol BUT this particular post is gonna open with the foundation of this whole thing: Alternian money! how do you get it and what the hell is it even good for?

the short answer is basically all kinds! we know by the literal throne of riches that HIC sits upon there's value placed on precious metals (such as gold) and representative money (as seen with caegars, boonbucks, etc); however, while use of gold, jewels, and banknotes is likely still common for those who have it to maintain trade of power--or else why would it be around?-- like in our world, fiat money seems to carry the brunt of buying power for most daily practical use. Obviously on the micro level, colonies of the empire are going to have their nuances based in what goods they produce and export, but by-and-large the "worth" of Alternian money is backed entirely by the empress's say-so!

This also conveniently makes it very easy for the economy on Alternia to not come to a grinding halt every time someone dies, which as we know is pretty fuckin often. lower hues don't earn enough for it to matter if they stop spending, and if it's someone important, that wealth doesn't stay stagnant cos it can be as easily redistributed or disappeared as any imaginary number, while actual physical assets are essentially up for grabs to anyone who likes a bit of treasure hunting.

That said: while lowbloods clearly don't get nearly as much leeway as highbloods, they can at least afford decent housing (Xefros and even Karkat have reasonably large abodes that are well maintained!) and obviously are able to get things like food, clothes, and hobby items as well. This can be attributed to gigs and work when they're old enough, but we know trolls must have someplace to shelter before then; after all, the population needed to sustain the empire has to remain steady enough to account for all the other ways a troll can die, and letting literal toddlers just starve or freeze the moment they're set free in the world kneecaps that from the get-go. they must have means of self-efficiency before being able to work.

So when trolls who pass their trials are sent along with carpenter droids to build/renovate their hive, an allowance account based on their place in the hemospectrum is opened, and pretty much all purchases thereafter are made using that account's unique number*. A young troll's first purchase is their home, and depending on the account limit, they can go on to expand and customize that hive to suit their interests after the basics (kitchen/bed/bath) are placed. After that, the account auto-refills in regular intervals for as long as the account is open. if the account goes inactive for too long, the troll is presumed dead and as mentioned above, that money just disappears/assets are redistributed.

When a troll is old enough to work, finds a hobby to monetize, or otherwise finds a source of income outside their allowance, money earned can be put into that account/any branch accounts off of the main one! this works best with fiat money (there are ways to convert physical assets to imaginary numbers for this account but it's a massive pain in the ass so most won't bother**), but any physical cash can be kept the good old fashioned way: piggy banks. some goods can ONLY be purchased with the account money, as online shopping pretty much dominates the modern landscape, but local places may take cash for any number of uses; such as arcade games, tips to your servers (this is mostly done as a show of irony or disdain), betting pools, or purchases that the buyer would want to keep discreet for any reason.

because a troll's allowance is pretty rigidly assigned, any accounts that become especially high or low relative to their hue can draw scrutiny, so cash is also handy to circumvent that issue in some cases, though is harder in others (you're not gonna have much luck being paid cash only as a vtuber, for example). And while cash can make for a clean and easy purchase if you don't want it in your shopping history, it is FAR more susceptible to the random fluctuations due to local inflation or by new acquisitions of the empire messing with the agreed upon value of goods and services.

obviously either way you're kinda fucked if those goods and services are no longer able to be acquired. so it very much behooves a troll, especially one in a lower neighborhood, to not piss off drones, highbloods, or even other lowbloods if they're batty enough. No one wants their town exploded after all! but even if it happens, as long as you're alive and have enough in your account, you can always have another hive built--though that takes having a droid handy, having enough saved up (without your account being shut down ofc), and making sure your new place doesn't stick out like a big ol target amongst the rubble, and is near enough still-standing civilization you can buy stuff like groceries. most trolls who find themself in this situation will simply take to a nomadic lifestyle, though this obviously comes with its own perils. At least they have decent public transit!***

Supposing you survive to adulthood, that account is maintained and used much the same way, with the difference being your allowance is cut off and your ability to maintain yourself is now wholly dependent on your job, a benefactor/quadrant, or your environment's resources. the exception to this is if you become an Overseer (which i will define and get into in the part about adult jobs), whereupon your cut of the empire's total wealth is gifted to you along with the planet/s you're now in charge of handling. For everyone else, you better hope your boss doesn't suck, and that the colony or ship you're plopped on is one where you can prove your usefulness well enough to live comfortably.

so that's the UBI! Next post will get into jobs on alternia (might split it up between lowbloods and highbloods cos it's genuinely so fucking much), and after that i'll cover what work as an adult looks like~

OBLIGATORY CAVEAT: this is all hc not just for HS but based on the rules of Stellar Parallax, so if you disagree it's ok and i'm not gonna argue with you, this is all silly blorbo funnnn

*with so many accounts, the number can get quite long. sometimes when an account is shut down, the number is recycled, which can cause some fun (stupid and annoying) glitches for the person unfortunate enough to get it. **if you are the sort to bother, you're either a highblood where it kind of actually makes it worth the trouble, or you're doing stuff that needs multiple accounts and probably some kind of encryption service, e.g., WILDLY illegal shit ***trains and buses are not safer, just less walking to do.

#homestuck #fantroll #hiveswap #fanventure #world building

13 notes · View notes

sophieinwonderland · 2 months ago

Note

as a genuine question, why is it that you want to spread plurality?

FIRST, like I said in the other post about it, I think a lot of children have natural plurality. Society calls these "imaginary friends". But many demonstrate a high level of self-awareness and autonomy consistent with other people. (To be clear, I don't think all imaginary companions are headmates. But I think about a third to two thirds are.)

My host's mom had "imaginary companions" herself as a teen. She would tell my host stories about adventures they had when she was young, and she later came to believe they might have been spirits. She even looked at cemeteries in the town her companions "lived" in once she was older. (That town BTW was Picher Oklahoma, now an actual ghost town.)

She pushed them away because of the social pressure. Because people would make fun of her for them. Because her parents thought she needed to "grow up."

It's wrong.

It's wrong that she was forced to get rid of her companions. To shut them out.

It was unfair to her. It was unfair to her companions. And it's unfair to the hundreds of millions of kids who are put in that position.

Future children deserve to be able to make the choice for themselves to keep their companions instead of having society choose for them.

SECOND, Tulpamancy has been shown to help with mental health. It can help with loneliness and depression. These studies are so far based on self-reports, but the future for tulpamancy to help people looks promising.

There are similar benefits to religion, which works on a similar principle of building a relationship to an invisible other. But religion can be subverted. It can be used to spread hateful and harmful dogma. With tulpamancy, you make your own tulpa. That tulpa learns and grows with experience. Their beliefs are not subject to the whims of preachers bending gospel to their values or millennia-old morality from a different world. I would prefer someone in need, given the choice of companionship with an invisible other, choose tulpamancy over religion.

And for people who are suicidal, who are thinking of ending their lives... I think it helps to both have someone else to live for, and to know that if you took your life, you would be taking theirs as well.

I know of plenty of people who have talked about how their tulpas saved their lives.

THIRD, I believe in a plural future. One where we are free to live our lives as publicly as we want without persecution. Getting there though... it requires political power. And in a Democracy, which I hope we will still be even if prospects are looking dim due to recent events, power is most often achieved through numbers. The more systems there are, the more powerful systems will be as a voting bloc.

It's obviously not just about the numbers in the community. It's also going to be about allies. But numbers will help a lot.

I want to get to a point where politicians are thinking about what they can do to help get the "plural vote," and appeal to plurals as a community. I want to get to the point where we can celebrate the first openly plural congresspersons.

And it's not just political. Systems are also consumers. I want to see social media companies willing to implement more system-friendly features. I'd like Discord to add an official feature that was similar to Pluralkit but without the issues associated with Pluralkit. For example, a lot of servers don't like plurakit because of its moderation problems. From what I understand, the fact that it goes through bots makes it really hard to block or ban users.

But if Discord made this an official feature of the site, I think a lot more servers would be more willing to use it.

Tumblr already has sideblogs that make it plural-friendly. Why not Reddit and Facebook and other social media companies?

And the more plurals there are, the more companies will be willing to invest in positive plural media to appeal to them. From books to cartoons to movies.

Numbers matter. They matter for gaining political power in a Democracy. They matter for getting products catered to the plural community in a capitalist society.

#syscourse #pro endo #pro endogenic #plural #plurality #endogenic #multiplicity #systems #imaginary friends #imaginary friend #politics #political #system stuff #plural stuff #pluralblr #pluralgang #plural things #plural system

19 notes · View notes

adhdnojutsu · 2 years ago

Text

I am begging people to stop spreading this incorrect claim. The claim is based on KAKASHI'S TSUKUYOMI, not Sasuke's, and adds 0 value to any narrative, not even Itachi hate.

Itachi explicitly told Kakashi that he will be stabbing him for 72 hours. The 72 hours are Kakashi's perception, while in reality, Kakashi's time spent under genjutsu seemed to have lasted 1 second, or at least, a unique stabbing sequence lasted 1 second. Whether it's a real second or an experienced one, we get the above number of seconds in 72 hours.

The first person who made this meme baselessly applied Kakashi's Tsukuyomi experience to Sasuke's, although Itachi explicitly made his shorter. Itachi grabbed Sasuke and said "For 24 hours from now on, wander that day". So first of all, he never said Sasuke would be reliving the exact moment the sword came down on their parents for each second of 24 hours, let alone 72. And would 1 second really be enough to see both of them die? If that was what Itachi meant, we'd already have to divide above number by 3. Which would be awful enough, but makes no sense.

Because Itachi wanted to refresh Sasuke's hatred. Would showing him the same second's event on loop for 24 hours, be it the imaginary time passed or real time, really do that? Because I'd think if you made someone re-watch the same SECOND of horror for 24 hours on loop, let alone 72, they'd more likely grow dull to it. Exposure therapy, if you will.

So it would make much more sense if, both for traumatic effect and based on what was actually said, Sasuke relived the entire day including his final hours of happiness, the eerie build-up of the bloodbath in the compound, and importantly, what contributed a lot to messing him up: Itachi's stone-cold speech. And here, it wouldn't matter whether Itachi's definition of a "day" is 12 or 24 hours. Itachi explicitly said "wander that day", not "relive that moment". So if Sasuke wanders the entire day for 24 hours, he'd see his parents die twice at most, unless he "wanders" in such a wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey trajectory, that he keeps stumbling into that moment. Which would be a huge reach. For traumatic effect, resetting Sasuke's memory to before he discovered the massacre, letting Sasuke relive the whole day would be far more effective because Sasuke's mind would start fresh and unprepared.

Itachi never said "Tsukuyomi lasts 72 hours". Someone just claimed that based on Kakashi's crucifixion, and people ran with it. But Itachi said he controls time in Tsukuyomi, so there is no such thing as a "72 hour rule".

Itachi explicitly described what happens to Kakashi and for how long, and people believed it so uncritically that they applied it to all Tsukuyomi. So why not also believe Itachi when he explicitly describes what's going to happen to Sasuke? I'd think Itachi abused that poor boy enough without making up baseless numbers that add absolutely nothing, because whether Sasuke relives that one second 2 or 518,400 times, surely, he'll never forget the first time.

#naruto #itachi #itachi uchiha #naruto shippuden #uchiha itachi #tsukuyomi #genjutsu #uchiha massacre #uchiha sasuke #sasuke #sasuke uchiha #naruto memes

150 notes · View notes