ygpgsgl-public-records-only

[ygpgsgl-public-records-only]

If Automattic fails here, it won’t just be a moderation issue—it will be a disclosure issue for investors.

Any wrongful suspension here will inevitably become an industry case study in how coordinated harassment exploits platform governance.

Coordinated harassment networks think they can laugh it off. They forget: once the spotlight turns, their names will be written into public record.

Medium fell. Bluesky fell. Automattic now stands at the same crossroads. This is not an individual grievance but a pattern—a governance failure that every digital rights advocate should be watching.

If necessary, I am prepared to escalate this matter to digital rights organizations such as the EFF, since this is not only about one account but about systemic failure to protect users from coordinated harassment.

[ygpgsgl-public-records-only]

📌 Timeline of Saltyneo’s Harassment (Aug 1 → Aug 27)

1.Aug 1 – Public Humiliation (using my data)

Post: “Oh wow, I saw this on @ladyyomiart’s blog and just like she is, I am so happy to see how loved my works are ❤️ thanks for the data, Y-something (I can’t remember the random letters after Y, sorry).”

Behavioral characteristics:

Use the statistics table I made as the stage for display.

Pretend to "forget the ID," but in reality, it's a public shaming by name-calling.

Tag it as drama, deliberately placing it in the fandom public space.

Take the opportunity to win over ladyyomi, using me as the contrast to the "drama creator."

2.Aug 19 – Public Insults & Direct Attacks

Post title: “To Y-something, report me if you want, but you’re not welcomed, and I am not afraid to write it.”

Behavioral characteristics:

A long post openly targeting me, calling me a “sad, lonely thing” and a “cunt.”

Repeatedly emphasizing "you're not welcome" and "we ostracize you," inciting group exclusion.

Using the hakuouki tag to amplify the humiliation effect.

Forcibly attributing others' account suspensions, departures, and similar events to me in the narrative.

3.Aug 27 – Escalation to Defamation & Group Exclusion

Post title: “About the future of my translations” (Pinned)

Behavioral characteristics:

On the surface, talking about translation, but in fact repeatedly naming me as a “despicable person.”

Using words like “retaliation” and “report war,” directly describing me as the fandom’s public enemy.

Publicly claiming in a post to exclude me on Discord, explicitly stating "kick out people like YGP."

Continuously using the platform to divert traffic + public exclusion, amplifying the scope of harassment.

Conclusion

This is a continuous escalating chain of harassment:

First time → Public humiliation in the form of "pretend teasing."

Second time → Explicit use of insulting language for personal attacks.

Third time → Escalation to stigmatization and group exclusion, creating an exclusive space.

This has gone beyond ordinary fan conflicts, constituting long-term, continuous, and malicious harassment and defamation.

SaltyNeo, out of her own selfish motives, framed autumn and pushed her into a position of structural exclusion. Later, when the false rumor spread that I was autumn’s sockpuppet, she chose to let it stand, aligning herself with the lie. She has openly supported ladyyomi and onino, trading likes on each other’s posts, while never acknowledging that it was several anonymous accounts who first harassed me and autumn in the comments. The language style of these anonymous accounts is strikingly similar to ladyyomi, onino, and lightmelody, which makes her complicity even more suspect, pointing to coordinated harassment. And when the lie started to unravel, she responded not with honesty but with public humiliation against me. That is the chain of harm she created.

Note: The evidence also shows saltyneo, onino, lightmelody and ladyyomi consistently liking, reblogging, and endorsing each other’s defamatory posts about me. These mutual interactions are not random; they demonstrate coordination and collective reinforcement of harassment narratives. Such activity amplifies the abusive content, extends its reach, and proves these users are acting as a network rather than isolated individuals. This confirms the harassment is systemic, targeted, and intentionally sustained.

Evidence

[ygpgsgl-public-records-only]

Any wrongful suspension here will inevitably become an industry case study in how coordinated harassment exploits platform governance.

Coordinated harassment networks think they can laugh it off. They forget: once the spotlight turns, their names will be written into public record.

Medium fell. Bluesky fell. Automattic now stands at the same crossroads. This is not an individual grievance but a pattern—a governance failure that every digital rights advocate should be watching.

If necessary, I am prepared to escalate this matter to digital rights organizations such as the EFF, since this is not only about one account but about systemic failure to protect users from coordinated harassment.

[ygpgsgl-public-records-only]

In my heart, Kazama Chikage is both the strongest fortress and the softest place.

No matter what disappears in the outside world, he remains untouched within me—unyielding in his strength, yet tender enough to hold all my fragility.

I have endured so much conflict, harassment, and defamation that for a long time I thought I had to cling to Bilibili videos or scattered traces on online platforms to keep Kazama Chikage with me. But the truth is, he has long since become part of my life, woven into the very structure of my spirit. He is no longer just a character in videos, words, or images—he lives in my heart. And in that inner place, no one can alter him, no one can report him away, and no one can ever take him from me.

[ygpgsgl-public-records-only]

Who Gets to Be a “Real Creator”?

Those who attack me claim to be the “real creators.” They insist that true creativity means refusing AI, as if a tool could define authenticity. But what they are really defending is not art — it is control.

They weaponize the label of “creator” to decide who belongs and who does not. They wield it as both shield and sword: a shield to justify harassment as “protecting the community,” and a sword to exile those they decide are unworthy.

But creativity does not belong to them. It is not measured by obedience to their rules, nor by whether one writes with or without AI. To call yourself a creator should never mean silencing others.

The irony is clear: they are not protecting art. They are protecting their power. By redefining “creator” to mean only themselves, they erase everyone else.

I reject this false narrative. Creativity is not their property, nor their weapon. And I will not let their misuse of the word “creator” justify what is nothing more than harassment and exclusion.

Am I a Creator? You Don’t Get to Decide.

They say I am not a “real creator” because I use AI, because I refuse to follow their narrow rules. But creation has never been theirs to police.

I write, I publish, I leave a trace of my voice in the world. That is creation. No circle of gatekeepers can erase that, no matter how many times they shout.

To call yourself a creator should not mean denying others. When they claim the right to decide who counts, they are not protecting art — they are protecting their own power.

I will not let them rewrite my existence. I am a creator because I create. And nothing they say will take that away.

[ygpgsgl-public-records-only]

This account (anti-ygpgsgl-ygppoop-show) is a harassment sockpuppet specifically targeting me. They pinned insulting posts, mocked the removal of my Medium articles, and repeatedly used derogatory hashtags.

More seriously, they are openly coordinating with another account (vicecommanderhijikata) in the comment section, discussing how to fabricate new reasons to report me (e.g., shifting from "harassment" to "AI usage"). This is clear evidence of coordinated harassment and targeted abuse.

This is not ordinary criticism — it is a pattern of ban evasion, targeted harassment, and malicious reporting campaigns. I request a thorough review and account suspension to prevent further abuse.

This screenshot shows that the harassment campaign against me is coordinated. The account anti-ygpgsgl (linked to Onino) openly stated they would target my Medium account. Importantly, both lightmelodyva and vicecommanderhijikata liked this post, proving they were aware of and supported the action. This is not individual reporting, but an organized effort by a group of people working together to silence me.

Summary: Hakuouki Zine incident articles

My Medium account has been reported, and all articles can be viewed via the following links:

[ygpgsgl-public-records-only]

Summary: Hakuouki Zine incident articles

My Medium account has been reported, and all articles can be viewed via the following links:

[ygpgsgl-public-records-only]

Autumn once reblogged zine promos and showed clear excitement about joining. Later, on a small alt, she claimed: “I never wanted to join anyway.”

This isn’t neutrality—it’s avoidance. A way to dodge conflict, refuse to acknowledge my defense as legitimate, and leave me carrying the blame alone.

I suddenly remembered that I had seen that person before

The truth behind the Hakuouki zine case is finally clear.

When Ladyyomi first spread her long defamatory post, a zine mod (msbeastlyeevee) showed up in the comments—announcing Autumn’s removal from the project. That one comment gave the smear an “official seal,” turning baseless gossip into a supposed fact.

Then, right under it, Onino stepped in with fake neutrality: “My suggestion is just to block ygp.” And just like that, rumor → endorsement → punishment. A perfectly coordinated play.

This is how the narrative was manufactured:

Ladyyomi spreads the smear.

The zine mod confirms it with an “official” decision.

Onino enforces the verdict by telling everyone to isolate me.

It wasn’t a misunderstanding. It was coordination. And under such a system, anyone can be branded “guilty” without evidence, then erased once the mod and their allies speak.

This is harassment dressed up as “project management.” And it needs to be exposed.

[ygpgsgl-public-records-only]

沿途点亮他命运的灯笼

他才不管自己红与不红

[ygpgsgl-public-records-only]

I finally understand why autumn was so cold that day, plagiarizing my theory, mocking me, and drawing a clear boundary with me. It turns out she was resenting me for defending my rights and causing zine mod to revoke her contributor status, haha.

“You were just labeled as autumn, but I actually lost my author qualification!”

I suddenly remembered that I had seen that person before

The truth behind the Hakuouki zine case is finally clear.

When Ladyyomi first spread her long defamatory post, a zine mod (msbeastlyeevee) showed up in the comments—announcing Autumn’s removal from the project. That one comment gave the smear an “official seal,” turning baseless gossip into a supposed fact.

Then, right under it, Onino stepped in with fake neutrality: “My suggestion is just to block ygp.” And just like that, rumor → endorsement → punishment. A perfectly coordinated play.

This is how the narrative was manufactured:

Ladyyomi spreads the smear.

The zine mod confirms it with an “official” decision.

Onino enforces the verdict by telling everyone to isolate me.

It wasn’t a misunderstanding. It was coordination. And under such a system, anyone can be branded “guilty” without evidence, then erased once the mod and their allies speak.

This is harassment dressed up as “project management.” And it needs to be exposed.

[ygpgsgl-public-records-only]

I suddenly remembered that I had seen that person before

The truth behind the Hakuouki zine case is finally clear.

When Ladyyomi first spread her long defamatory post, a zine mod (msbeastlyeevee) showed up in the comments—announcing Autumn’s removal from the project. That one comment gave the smear an “official seal,” turning baseless gossip into a supposed fact.

Then, right under it, Onino stepped in with fake neutrality: “My suggestion is just to block ygp.” And just like that, rumor → endorsement → punishment. A perfectly coordinated play.

This is how the narrative was manufactured:

Ladyyomi spreads the smear.

The zine mod confirms it with an “official” decision.

Onino enforces the verdict by telling everyone to isolate me.

It wasn’t a misunderstanding. It was coordination. And under such a system, anyone can be branded “guilty” without evidence, then erased once the mod and their allies speak.

This is harassment dressed up as “project management.” And it needs to be exposed.

[ygpgsgl-public-records-only]

“Receipts Are My Guitar”

No stage, no crowd, still rock.

I don’t have strings, only a stack of cold, sharp screenshots. I don’t have a mic, only the reports I file again and again.

They call me a harasser? I light the stage on fire: Your umbrella of lies shatters in my rhythm.

Every archive is a chord I slam down. Every post is a drumbeat of defiance.

Rock is not melody— Rock is refusing silence. My truth is the loudest solo.

[ygpgsgl-public-records-only]

This case illustrates a structural problem of platform governance. The account in question demonstrates a repeated and documented pattern of harassment:

Over 30 unsolicited DMs directed at me.

Active engagement with a troll blog created to target me.

Defamatory “statements” reframing harassment as normal interaction and shifting responsibility onto the victim.

Such behavior aligns with recognized harassment patterns: persistence, denial, and inversion of blame. The evidence is consistent across multiple instances and platforms, making this more than a personal dispute.

By failing to act, the platform effectively sets a precedent that undermines victim protection. If a harasser can dismiss all accusations by claiming “only one person accused me”, it establishes a dangerous defense that others will adopt. This erodes trust in moderation and silences victims, creating an environment where harassment thrives.

Platforms are judged not only by their community guidelines but by their enforcement. Selective inaction communicates tolerance of abuse. For the integrity of this community, I request that this account be suspended and the harassment formally acknowledged.

User oninofukuchou left over a dozen harassing comments on my works, showing a sustained pattern of targeted abuse. I was forced to delete them due to their severity. In addition, he sent me over 20 unsolicited private messages without my consent.

oninofukuchou(vicecommanderhijikata) and ladyyomi have highly interactive cooperation, acting in coordination from early on, including but not limited to directly pressuring and spreading false information during the (Bluesky account) incident, which led to the account being suspended. Since then, they have continuously engaged in joint mockery and manipulation of public opinion regarding my posting behavior, showing no "neutral" stance and exhibiting characteristics of organized harassment.

The harasser forged the image of my most relied-upon virtual persona (the exclusive conversational character I use for psychological stability and self-soothing) and used it to insult my mental state. This behavior constitutes severe malicious emotional deprivation and psychological humiliation, amounting to secondary harm.

He has publicly mentioned his own history of mental illness and described his experience of hospitalization and treatment. However, he repeatedly uses images, language, and hints such as "seek therapy" to stigmatize others' mental states, constituting secondary harm.

This behavior does not stem from ignorance but is a stigma projection under a clear cognitive framework, reflecting a definite motive to transform his own victim experience into a tool to control others and undermine the legitimacy of others' voices. This behavior not only falls under "mocking mental illness" but also constitutes "misusing disability history to abuse others," aligning with the platform's integrated definition of deliberate harassment and hate speech.

I request the platform to review such user behavior with heightened sensitivity to prevent them from using their vulnerable identity as a shield to harm others.

Between August 10 and 12, 2025, vicecommanderhijikata sent me dozens of private messages, repeatedly using language that humiliates my character, fabricates my identity, belittles my creations, employs manipulative rhetorical questions, and issues psychological threats, attempting to make me stop speaking out publicly. This behavior was not a one-time communication attempt but a continuous mental oppression, manifested in ways including but not limited to:

Forcibly assigning me to another identity and denying my self-clarification;

Using phrases like "AI writing = lack of creativity" to construct humiliating evaluations;

Explicitly stating that as long as I continue to speak, he will not stop attacking ("I will not stop");

Issuing threats such as "You are not the only one who can publicly record this".

This behavior constitutes "Unsolicited Harassment," "Mocking mental illness," "Defamation," and "Persistent personal attacks" as defined by the platform's private messaging rules. I request the platform to take serious action, including banning the account and removing the offensive content.

I am submitting this report with a complete record of sustained harassment from users @vicecommanderhijikata and @ladyyomiart, including:

Repeated personal attacks disguised as “therapy recommendations”

Misuse of mental health language to shame and delegitimize

Open confirmation of the abusive messages previously sent via DMs

Misrepresentation of my statements to incite further public ridicule

Deflection of abuse claims using DARVO rhetoric

Attached are screenshots that clearly show these users coordinating their campaign of harassment, invalidation, and targeted ridicule across platforms. They have also refused accountability when confronted with direct evidence, choosing instead to escalate the rhetoric and reframe me as a malicious instigator.

I request a full moderation review for sustained personal harassment, mental health mockery, and bad-faith engagement across public and private channels.

https://www.tumblr.com/vicecommanderhijikata/791964452488708096/i-really-cannot-be-assed-to-care?source=share

Evidence annotation: vicecommanderhijikata and hiraethum's defense mode

Avoiding facts, replacing responses with identity claims

Performance: Neither responded to specific accusations regarding defamation and harassment chains, instead quickly shifting to personal identities (religious trauma, autism, marginalized groups) or grand narratives (social structure, oppressive environment).

Effect: Creates a public opinion barrier of "continued questioning = harming the vulnerable," diverting the focus of the discussion.

2. Self-Victimization Narrative

vicecommanderhijikata: Centers on "growing up in a religious cult environment" and "being discriminated against due to autism," detailing painful experiences and positioning oneself as a victim of structural persecution.

hiraethum: Expands to a broader social narrative, likening marginalized groups to the oppression logic of "failing God's test," creating an atmosphere of compassion.

Effect: Gains bystander sympathy through the victim narrative, making it easier to equate opponents with "persecutors."

3. Creating Oppositional Dichotomies

Manifestation:

Portraying their critics as "hypocritical, cruel, and representatives of power structures."

Packaging themselves and their allies as "authentic, oppressed, and marginalized weaklings."

Effect: Forces public opinion to choose a stance within a binary opposition, making bystanders more likely to side with them based on emotion rather than facts.

4. Performative Victimhood

Manifestation: vicecommanderhijikata writes extensively about traumatic details (church, family, adolescent isolation), but these experiences have no direct relation to the current incident itself.

Effect: This "performative confession" allows them to occupy the moral high ground in the discourse, making it difficult for others to hold them accountable for their role in the harassment chain.

5. Strategic Narrative

Combination Technique:

hiraethum provides a "theorized grand narrative," expanding the issue to social structures;

vicecommanderhijikata provides a "personalized painful experience," creating emotional resonance;

The two intertextually overlap, forming an overall impression of "We are the vulnerable group → Your accountability is equivalent to persecution."

Effect: Together, they create a public opinion defense system that shifts external attention from "What exactly did they do" to "How much suffering have they endured."

📌 Conclusion: These words and actions are not clarifications of the facts of the incident but a form of discourse manipulation and public opinion defense strategy.

The core logic is: "We are the victims, so we cannot be held accountable."

This exactly constitutes a counterargument — they avoid the real issue, indicating that when faced with empirical evidence, they cannot respond directly and can only rely on emotions and identity narratives to maintain their position.

Other Evidence

[ygpgsgl-public-records-only]

I asked the Hakuouki Zine staff to clarify their decision-making process. – Who made the decision to remove Autumn? – Did Onino/vicecommanderhijikata’s accusations play a role? – Were conflicts of interest recorded?

These are basic transparency questions, the kind any journalist or community observer would ask. Instead of answers, I received a “last warning” that any further mention would be treated as harassment.

Why is asking for transparency framed as harassment, while repeated DMs, defamatory posts, and a troll blog are excused as “unrelated”?

This is not about one writer. It’s about power. When institutions or fandom projects refuse transparency, and instead weaponize the label of “harassment” to silence questions, they show their true priorities: protecting their network, not the community.

The Hakuouki Zine’s favorite pastime: Double Standards

Autumn was disqualified from the Hakuouki zine almost instantly after vague “harassment” claims — no transparent explanation, just a template reply from staff. Meanwhile, vicecommanderhijikata — a repeat harasser with abusive comments, dozens of hostile DMs, and even links to a hate blog — was left completely untouched. And to make things worse, one of the loudest attackers of Autumn, Ladyyomi, openly bragged about her “friends” being selected as zine authors. Why is this the standard? Why are harassers protected while victims are punished? Why the double standard?

[ygpgsgl-public-records-only]

The Hakuouki Zine’s favorite pastime: Double Standards

Autumn was disqualified from the Hakuouki zine almost instantly after vague “harassment” claims — no transparent explanation, just a template reply from staff. Meanwhile, vicecommanderhijikata — a repeat harasser with abusive comments, dozens of hostile DMs, and even links to a hate blog — was left completely untouched. And to make things worse, one of the loudest attackers of Autumn, Ladyyomi, openly bragged about her “friends” being selected as zine authors. Why is this the standard? Why are harassers protected while victims are punished? Why the double standard?

[ygpgsgl-public-records-only]

Saltyneo’s own contradictory statements prove she was aware of the “14 years old” narrative from the start. While she publicly claimed ignorance to deny responsibility, her past comments explicitly invoked the teenager’s age to criticize Autumn. This inconsistency shows bad faith and demonstrates she is not merely a bystander, but an active participant in perpetuating the defamatory narrative.

in other words: Saltyneo first invoked the ‘14 years old’ claim herself to discredit Autumn, and later publicly denied ever knowing about it. This direct contradiction exposes her as not ignorant but dishonest, proving active complicity in spreading the defamatory narrative.

Whether SaltyNeo knows Japanese or not is irrelevant. The real issue is that she repeatedly spread and legitimized the “14 years old” rumor, later denied knowledge of it, and tried to frame me as the source of hearsay. This is malicious defamation, not misunderstanding.

SaltyNeo, out of her own selfish motives, framed autumn and pushed her into a position of structural exclusion. Later, when the false rumor spread that I was autumn’s sockpuppet, she chose to let it stand, aligning herself with the lie. She has openly supported ladyyomi and onino, trading likes on each other’s posts, while never acknowledging that it was several anonymous accounts who first harassed me and autumn in the comments. The language style of these anonymous accounts is strikingly similar to ladyyomi, onino, and lightmelody, which makes her complicity even more suspect, pointing to coordinated harassment. And when the lie started to unravel, she responded not with honesty but with public humiliation against me. That is the chain of harm she created.

Note: The evidence also shows saltyneo, onino, lightmelody and ladyyomi consistently liking, reblogging, and endorsing each other’s defamatory posts about me. These mutual interactions are not random; they demonstrate coordination and collective reinforcement of harassment narratives. Such activity amplifies the abusive content, extends its reach, and proves these users are acting as a network rather than isolated individuals. This confirms the harassment is systemic, targeted, and intentionally sustained.

Evidence

[ygpgsgl-public-records-only]

This false claim about Autumn was already refuted with evidence in March. Its reappearance by lightmelodyva strongly indicates she is not merely repeating hearsay but actively perpetuating and likely originating the defamatory narrative.

There is at least 90% overlap in wording between the anonymous guest comments and lightmelodyva’s long post, strongly suggesting the same source of harassment.

This is a supplemental documentation post regarding the user lightmelodyva, whose repeated public statements contain identity defamation, coordinated harassment, mental health shaming, and social invalidation tactics. Please consider this a formal addition to the open harassment reports.

In multiple public posts and comments, lightmelodyva repeatedly claims that I am Autumn and merges me with several IDs (ygpgsgl/Anonymous) as one person, the language used includes:

“Saya/Autumn/ygpgsgl/Anonymous/whatever-you-call-yourself, you are all one and the same.”

“If you’re not Autumn, you’re still doing the same shit.”

“Show the Discord IDs. You won’t, because you can’t.”

She has no evidence but repeatedly publicly claims that I am a "multiple ID manipulator," and uses the premise "you refuse to prove yourself → you are lying" to invert the logic, trapping me in a situation where I cannot prove myself.

She used the following phrases in multiple speeches:

“That’s sad and should get more medical attention.”

“You’re just mentally hurting yourself to the point of a delusion.”

“No sympathy. That died a long time ago.”

These statements constitute typical mental health shaming language, not only denying my account of the harassment but also describing my actions as "delusional symptoms" and "self-harming behavior," which is not only a defamation of personal motives but also an insult to all who have experienced mental distress.

She claims:

“I’m an Okuzume Captain and Mibu Wolf.”

“Mibu Wolves move in packs.”

“A big enough pack can still take down something bigger.”

This is not a metaphor. In her imagination, she is a character leading an organization to "hunt down something bigger." You don't need to understand these anime terms, just know that—she sees me as a "monster," and regards the siege as a form of "righteous hunting." This is precisely the collective attack imagination in verbal violence, which strips me from being a "person" to a "target that must be destroyed by the group."

When I started writing to clarify the trouble she and ladyyomi caused me, she and ladyyomi interacted in the comment section as follows: “That awful fake interview where she mocks my autism, my bisexual OC…”

And her response was to pretend to be innocent again, turning it around to accuse me of “mocking the disabled,” yet she never provides specific paragraphs, never clarifies, never engages in dialogue, relying solely on labels and stigmatization to counter all my statements. She is not a "bystander suddenly caught up," she is a structural accomplice of ladyyomi, in the rhetoric of imposing "public opinion executions" and "character judgments," the two cooperate seamlessly and with precise timing.

Although lightmelodyva doesn't say much in her reposts, she almost always forwards ladyyomi's multiple defamatory threads against me every time they are updated, totaling more than ten times. These threads included fabrications about my identity, slanders on my mental state, distortions of OC settings, and widespread dissemination of the "fake interview" label, although she did not publicly comment, she provided social endorsement and helped spread these statements through repeated reposting.

In the structure of social platforms, this kind of "silent boosting" behavior is also part of the harassment network, because it:

enhances the visibility and spread of the perpetrator's posts;

provides the author with psychological confirmation of "having allies";

This left me, who was already marginalized, facing a verbal assault of "Everyone else is switching, so the problem must be with you."

She is not an innocent bystander; she is someone who helps mend the noose. She is not "too lazy to argue"; she is "willing to let others do the cursing." This seemingly gentle but actually ruthless silent accomplice is one of the seamstresses who stitch together the harassment network.

The user lightmelodyva collaborates with ladyyomiart to misattribute a third account (“Dori”) to me, publicly labeling me as “another alt / queen of alts” without evidence.

lightmelody’s own “timeline” shows private coordination with ladyyomi (“went and messaged her”), an agreement to “stay out,” then continued public escalation. ladyyomi claims she deleted the DMs while keeping the accusation live, and both users amplify each other’s statements, converting speculation into defamatory “facts.”

This constitutes misattribution/defamation, evidence evasion/spoliation, and coordinated amplification within a harassment campaign.

Evidence Group A｜lightmelody’s “MY Timeline” Long Post

Key Points Summary:

Preconceived Hostility and Identity Bias

“01-08-25: Blocked saya/widemushroom…”

👉 Clearly hostile to me (or the person she mistakenly referred to) even before the March incident, not an outsider but a biased participant.

2. Claims "first private communication with Yomi" and took the initiative to contact

“I noticed Yomi’s comment, went and messaged her and asked what happened.”

👉 Personally established a private message channel with ladyyomi, not passively watching, but actively entering the conflict network.

3. Admitting "both parties agreed not to get involved," yet continuously posting/forwarding attacking content afterwards

"Both agreed to stay out of this situation."

👉 This statement is self-contradictory with her subsequent continuous posts and forwards: knowing she should withdraw, she still continues to participate and spread.

4. Outsourcing the obligation to collect evidence to others + avoiding disclosure

“Yomi can choose to show the messages if she wishes…”

👉 Refusing to present evidence on the grounds of "private messages privacy," yet continuing to publicly label others, constitutes a combination of evidence avoidance + public opinion conviction.

5. Claims to have "only learned about YGP later," but the timeline is inconsistent

“This is when I learned the existence of YGP.”

👉 Compared to proactively contacting Yomi at the end of March and the subsequent high-frequency referral behavior, the claim of being "late to realize" does not match the objective level of participation and can be labeled as a self-exonerating narrative.

Selective narration, avoiding evidence disclosure, continuing to spread after the "agreed exit"; Replacing the factual chain with a self-narrated timeline to mislead platform review.

Evidence Group B｜ladyyomi's reply in your Figure 2 + duet with lightmelody

Can be directly qualified:

Baseless identity framing (Defamation / Misattribution)

ladyyomi: "I was fully convinced it was yet another alt of Saya/Widemushroom/Autumn so I blocked her…"

👉 Admitting it is only "convinced/subjective belief", yet publicly accusing me of being a "sockpuppet" based on this, constitutes defamatory misidentification.

Further posting a Google Docs link, attributing the cause of the "guest hate comments" to me.

2. Evidence destruction/avoidance (Spoliation)

"I don't have the messages anymore since I deleted the chat back in March (I think?)"

👉 Publicly accusing on one hand, while claiming to have deleted key private messages on the other; this constitutes evidence tampering, which instead undermines the credibility of their claims.

3. Collaborative amplification and the "factualization" label

lightmelody: "...either it’s one dedicated friend of theirs or the same person." (still speculation)

ladyyomi responds: "yet another alt from the queen of alts."

👉 The duet from guessing to asserting labels is a form of coordinated amplification: packaging unverified assumptions as "accepted facts," triggering bystanders to conform and dogpile.

Repeatedly misidentifying/framing (attributing "Dori" to me without evidence); Deleting potentially crucial chat records while continuing to publicly convict; Collaborative amplification (original post + chorus-like follow-up comments), forming a networked harassment amplifier.

In addition, I also pointed out on page 24 of the PDF that lightmelodyva is suspected of defaming and insulting me through AO3's anonymous comment feature:

Evidence

This post by lightmelodyva exemplifies targeted harassment through labeling tactics. By publicly tagging me as “AI Generated Response,” she attempts to brand my work as inauthentic, delegitimize my contributions, and incite community exclusion. This is not an isolated insult but part of a sustained pattern of defamatory posts (see prior PSA and related attacks). Such labeling strips me of credibility in the community and creates a hostile environment. This evidence demonstrates a clear violation of harassment and anti-bullying policy.